:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/12814137/gyi0062179229.0.jpg)
Is it amateur hour @pff ? Serious question. Go home, you're drunk.
— J_Ames07 (@J_Ames07) May 7, 2013
Really @pff? Jamaal Charles not in the top 100. Then you say it was because our offensive line helped him. #Weird
— Connor Dawson (@ConnorDawson9) May 7, 2013
So @pff leaves Charles off the Top 100 list. Instead of admitting they forgot about him, they blame his performance on good blocking?! #LOL
— Andy Reid (@FauxAndyReid) May 7, 2013
@pottercm @pff but u say he had great blocking I think ur full of baloney cuz I watched every game & charles had no blocking
— ChiefsFury1984 (@ChiefsFury1984) May 7, 2013
Spiller was @pff's 2nd RB in their top 101. He only had five 100 yd games. Charles had five 100 yd games AND two 200 yd games, not included.
— Chiefs_All_Day (@Chiefs_All_Day) May 7, 2013
I see @pff is punishing Jamaal Charles for getting good blocking. If Charles isn't a top 101 player in the NFL then IDK what's real anymore.
— Nathan Bramwell (@tipof_arrowhead) May 7, 2013
@pff How is the 2nd stat a negative? Because he has big play potential few others have?
— JComp11 (@Jcomp11) May 7, 2013
@pff this is rediculous, so Charles isn't good enough because he had too many big runs?Look at his career, highest YPC, still no respect
— Nick Dowd (@nick_dowd) May 7, 2013
@pff @jcomp11 @chiefs_all_day Jamaal is a top 5 back...different opinions or not, he's a top 100 player
— Heff (@Rheff7) May 7, 2013
@pff You guys are a joke..leaving Jamaal off the top 100 list is a crime
— Heff (@Rheff7) May 7, 2013