clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Balancing the Chiefs

New, comments

I've been frustrated the last few years with the Jekyll/Hyde phenomenon with the Kansas City Chiefs. Last year's offense was arguably the worst Chiefs offense of all time. This year, it's the defense. That led me to do a bit of research to see if a "balanced" offense and defense (via end of season rankings) had any correlation to winning. See for yourself:

Year Coach Off. Rank Def. Rank Diff. Win % Wins Losses
2002 Vermeil 4 32 28 50% 8 8
2008 Edwards 25 32 7 6% 1 10
2004 Vermeil 1 31 30 44% 7 9
2003 Vermeil 2 29 27 81% 13 3
2005 Vermeil 1 25 24 63% 10 6
2001 Vermeil 5 23 18 38% 6 10
1996 Schottenheimer 22 18 4 56% 9 7
2000 Cunningham 8 18 10 44% 7 9
1990 Schottenheimer 7 16 9 69% 11 5
2006 Edwards 16 16 0 56% 9 7
1999 Cunningham 12 14 2 56% 9 7
1991 Schottenheimer 5 13 8 63% 10 6
2007 Edwards 31 13 18 25% 4 12
1994 Schottenheimer 5 12 7 56% 9 7
1997 Schottenheimer 14 11 3 81% 13 3
1993 Schottenheimer 16 11 5 69% 11 5
1998 Schottenheimer 19 9 10 44% 7 9
1992 Schottenheimer 25 5 20 63% 10 6
1995 Schottenheimer 14 2 12 81% 13 3

Nothing ground breaking here but I figured it would stir up some great conversation.

Anyone else ready for it to be Thanksgiving yet???