Morning Update (Mentally Unstable Edition)
- New Chiefs blog - Big Matt's Chiefs Chat.
- Love this line from Michael Ash at WPI about reaching for draft picks -- "In a way, reaching on a draft pick is just another part of the "win now" philosophy. If a team reaches, they’re sacrificing better players in order to add a lesser talent at a position of need."
- Former Colts kicker Mike Vanderjagt worked out for the Chiefs yesterday. Thoughts on the former Pro Bowler?
- Jon Kitna, prankster.
- Chad Johnson should retire?
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
"win now" philosophy
If the Chiefs were in a legitimate position to "win now" but were just a couple of players away (ex: 1993-1997) then they better damn well get those couple of key players they need even if it means sacrificing a BPA v. need. You don't get very many chances to win in this league so when your time comes you have to seize, even at the expense of future years.
I could see exactly what we were doing in the Vermeil years. Ignoring the draft and adding veterans on defense to keep us afloat. I was fine with that. We ran the table on the 1st half of 2003 and were legitimate contenders to win it all.
Yes we're paying for that now, but was it worth it to put all your marbles in one basket and make a run? YES!
I'm with you.
I don't care what kind of set you run if your o line is as bad as ours is (and believe me, it is). Sometimes drafting the BPA is the right way to go, and a good example of this is the ravens. They have a phenomenal draft team and it has showed (besides Kyle power-baller), and even then, he was being talked about as one of the best talents in the draft (threw a football through the uprights from mid field on his knees).
Bottom line: There is nothing wrong, or even stupid, in drafting positional needs. Look at it this way: what are randy moss, steve smith, and chad johnson going to do if they have jeff george throwing to them? Nothing. Well, randy might catch a few because he is huge, but other than that, they won't be worth a dime because some manager saw a "game changing" runningback that he couldn't pass on.
Sorry, bit of a rant, but I can't stand hearing talk like that. What is the main priority of everyone on a football team? Make money*. Winning is just the means of doing so. So, if you can win now, why don't you? If winning leads to a larger dollar figure at the end of the year, then doesn't that make sense?
*Please don't grill me about players and personnel who like to win. Of course they do. But why do they like to win? The biggest reason is because for a lot of players, if they don't win, they will be out of a job. Anybody can lose everygame of the season for the right price.
Absolute Proof
Allen
re: Allen
Clip 1: Jared running around with the ball pointing to the crowd after forcing a fumble
Clip 2: Jared pointing to the crowd after his third and final sack of the game (didn't include the sack because it was a lousy angle)
Clip 3: Jared sacks Brunell in the first quarter, forcing a fumble.
Clip 4: Jared sacks Brunell later in the game (this is the very last clip in the video before the final whipcrack).
Anyway, definitely one of his better games! I had a few more sacks that I would have liked to have included, but there just wasn't room. :(
by GoChiefs81 on Apr 8, 2008 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions
Thank you
re: move
Jared has rodeo roots so it makes sense.
by GoChiefs81 on Apr 8, 2008 7:19 PM CDT up reply actions
I didn't look closely enough
Guess where a former scout thinks the Chiefs
Huh?
After a two-year absence, Denny Green returns to the bay area as the first major change in new managing general partner Carl Peterson era.
CP to the Raiders? this guy is an ass-hat...
With few elite LTs in the league
Since I live between Memphis and Oxford (Ole Miss)
Yeah, I am probably smoking something!
Coach and GM !
by Eric @ Arrowhead Pride on Apr 8, 2008 9:30 PM CDT up reply actions
I remember
by Eric @ Arrowhead Pride on Apr 8, 2008 9:33 PM CDT reply actions

by 






















