Arrowhead Pride: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Found Shot to Death


Chan Gailey: What Did the Chiefs Get?

After stints with the University of Florida, Troy State and the Air Force from 1975 to 1984, Chan Gailey landed in Denver as a defensive assistant and special teams coach for the Broncos. In his five year's with the Broncos, the team was ranked in the top ten every year but his last in one of the money stats for special teams -- kick return average.

After head coaching positions with the Birmingham Fire of the World League and Samford University, Gailey made his way back to the NFL as wide receivers coach for the Pittsburgh Steelers. He held that position for two years before being promoted to Pittsburgh's offensive coordinator. In his first year as OC, the Steelers' offense was ranked 15th in the NFL. The team was ranked 27th in passing offense and 2nd in rushing offense that year as well.

In Gailey's second year as offensive coordinator, the Steeler's averaged nearly 155 yards rushing per game, good enough for #1 in the NFL. The passing offense remained stagnant and finished the 1997 season ranked 23rd overall. The offense as a whole ranked 6th that year.

In every year Gailey was a coach with the Steelers, they made the playoffs and posted 12, 11, 10 and 11 win seasons respectively. With Gailey at the offensive helm in the 1996 season, the Steelers demolished the Colts 42 to 14 in one of the AFC Wild Card games. Unfortunately, that offensive explosion was quieted the next week when they lost to the Patriots 28 to 3. The Steelers avenged the Patriots loss the next season in the playoffs by beating them 7 to 6 in the divisional round. The Steelers ended up losing the next week in the AFC Championship to the Broncos.

Gailey leveraged his success in Pittsburgh to grab the head coaching position with the Dallas Cowboys, a position he held for two years. Gailey again improved the rushing offense of his team, keeping them ranked in the top ten in the league both years he was head coach. Oddly enough, Gailey took what was in the year before he came a 20th ranked Cowboy passing offense to a 9th ranked passing offense. Then, in 1999, passing production dropped and the Cowboys finished the season ranked 20th overall in passing offense. See a pattern yet?

The 1998 Cowboys posted a 10-6 record and won the NFC East. The 1999 team went .500 but still made the playoffs. Both years Dallas lost in the first round of the playoffs.

In Gailey's two-year stay with the Miami Dolphins as their offensive coordinator, the team hovered around the bottom ten in the league in terms of offensive production. The rushing offense didn't change much -- ranked 22nd in 1999; 14th in Gailey's first year in 2000; and back down to 23rd in his final year. The Dolphins passing offense was middle of the road before Gailey came on and fell to the bottom third of the league during his tenure as offensive coordinator.

Chan Gailey and the Dolphins went to the playoffs both years he was offensive coordinator. In 2000, the Dolphins made it to the divisional round of the AFC playoffs after beating Indianapolis in the wild card game. They were subsequently shut out by the Raiders, 27 to 0. The Dolphins were handily defeated the next year by the Super Bowl Champion Baltimore Ravens in the wild card game.

Chan Gailey spent the next six years as the head coach at Georgia Tech. I'm not going to look much into his 44-32 career record and subsequent resignation last year. College football is a different beast than the NFL. A college coach can lose to his school's biggest rival each year -- like Tech did against the University of Georgia each year Gailey was head coach -- and almost nothing short of a conference or national championship will keep that coach his job. Also, can you imagine recruiting for the ACC in the heart of SEC country? Gailey more than likely got SEC table scraps for recruits.

Now that I've laid out Chan Gailey's coaching resume for you, I hope some of the positives of his coaching career are coming to light.

Gailey has held a number of coaching positions that have encompassed nearly every aspect of football. He was a defensive coach with various colleges in the mid-1970s to the early 1980s. He held the position of defensive backs coach and defensive coordinator during those years. Throughout the rest of his coaching career, he's held the position of head coach, wide receivers coach, special teams coach and offensive coordinator. His coaching career spans over thirty-years and he's had relative success nearly everywhere he's gone.

I can't put it much better than Jon at MVN did yesterday:

  • None of his teams went below .500 and most of his teams won 10+ games

  • His teams usually hovered around the top 15 and usually ended up in the top 10

  • His teams have been very successful in the playoffs

I'm not sure what people who wanted a high-flying spread type offensive coordinator were thinking. Does the Chiefs personnel match up to that style? Not at all in my opinion. With improvement to the offensive line, the Chiefs are built to be a run first, pass second team, which is exactly what Gailey excels in creating. And I'm perfectly fine with that. A healthy Larry Johnson and an adequate offensive line -- a big "if" at this point in the off-season -- has the potential to push our rushing offense back into the top ten. I would much rather build a team around the run than the pass. Running the ball is much more reliable, especially in the playoffs.

Plus, emphasizing (but first shoring up) our league worst running game is only going to help Brodie Croyle. There's no reason to ask a player who hasn't started even half of a season's worth of games to carry the load with no help. Chan Gailey's style of offensive takes pressure off of the passing game, which is exactly what Brodie needs. It will allow him to grow more into the position than baptism by fire. You saw last year what zero threat in the running game can do to a QB.

Finally, Chan Gailey's philosophy meshes well with Herm's. This means more independence for Gailey and more control over his offense. Herm can trust him. Gailey is too established to be taking orders from our head coach. Herm is no longer running the show, baby-sitting a second-year coordinator. He has a professional in the ranks now.

Chan Gailey isn't going to come out and wow us with spectacularly designed plays. But I think he's just the guy out of the other candidates to lead this particular Chiefs' offense. Much like Marty-ball, Gailey's style may not be pretty but it sure is effective. With our defense holding steady, I'm reminded of the mid-1990s when the Chiefs were a balanced, successful football team. We had a few wins during that time, didn't we?

After a night of contemplation, I think this is a great hire by the Chiefs. There was no reason to gamble with the offensive coordinator position.

Update: Warpaint Illustrated has exclusive quotes from Herm about Chan Gailey. They give some good insight on the hire.

0 recs | Comment 63 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

here's the thing. The Coryell offense
can be adapted to a run first type of offense. See the Redskins of the 80s (hell, and this year, too) and the Cowboys of the 90s.  The whole notion that the Chiefs had a system and were trying to fit players into it is a misnomer.  They didn't have enough talent this year to make ANY system work.

by sm7600 on Jan 17, 2008 10:57 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We've got players at the skill positions
But an offense starts and stops with the offensive line.

by primetime 07 on Jan 17, 2008 11:04 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And
Chan Gailey's ability to run the ball at virtually every coaching job he's had assumes some skill and helping build an offensive line.

by Chris on Jan 17, 2008 11:05 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

agreed. and no system in the world
will work without one.

that, to me, is the primary job for the offensive side of the ball for the Chiefs.  Find a workable o-line.

by sm7600 on Jan 17, 2008 11:05 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Definitely
Last year was emergency surgery on the offensive line -- trying to keep enough pieces together just to survive. This year we rehab.

by Chris on Jan 17, 2008 11:07 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I was reading
his stats yesterday, could be good that he understands the defensive side of the ball, has to be helpful for a coordinator. The only thing I do not like is much like Jax teams will shut down the run and with the exception of the one year in Dallas he did not have a top rated passing attack. This day and age you have to be balanced.

by Eric on Jan 17, 2008 11:06 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No passing attack
I thought about the lower passing attack when I was looking at his stats too.  Then I saw who his quarterbacks were.  Kordell Stewart, a glorified wide receiver, and Jay Fielder who is an all time bust.

If you don't have the tools you can't build the house.

What's more important though, is that his teams went to the playoffs often while he was a coordinator, meaning that even if they didn't have QBs capable of mounting huge passing attacks, he STILL was able to get it done with the running game.

I know alot of people really like the excitment of the passing game, hell I'm one of them, but what really matters in the end is that you win.  I don't care whether its passing or running as long as they score enough points to win.  Chan Gailey has been able to do that.

by DJ on Jan 17, 2008 5:47 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I hate to break it to everybody
but this isn't 1994.

So let's look back at the last 7 SuperBowl winners.

Colts-Complex, well-developed, versatile offense.
Pittsburgh- Complex, well developed, versatile offense.
New England- Complex, well-developed, versatile offense.
New England- Complex, well-developed, versatile offense.
Tampa Bay- Complex, well-developed, versatile offense.
New England- See above.
Baltimore- Top 5 all time defense.

Note, a great line and strong running game are definitely elements of all these teams.

But it's not the only element. I'm a little frustrated that everyone, including the coach (not that he's wrong for thinking so! No criticism!) keep saying "we're just going to run the football and play football."

It's not that simple. Not anymore. Defenses are faster and stronger than ever.  Meanwhile, the rules are set to favor passing.  Every system above was run with a combination of short, intermediate, and deep passing, consistent running, and using backs out of the backfield (hence my earlier question about screen plays. We need them. Bad. McFadden, anyone?).

It's not that I don't think we should rebuild the o-line. But everyone seems to think that as long as we get a ProBowl o-line, it's off to the Super Bowl!

We need more than that.

Not criticising Herm Edwards for anything since December '07.

by Ridiculous Matt on Jan 17, 2008 11:26 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think the idea is that a good running game
will open up the passing game.  

Is this realistic with our offense?  Yes! (IMO)

We have great talent at our skill positions.  Dwayne Bowe, TG and LJ are all exceptional talents.  A solid offensive line will help the running game, but also it will begin to open a lot of doors for us in the passing game.

by primetime 07 on Jan 17, 2008 11:33 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm certain
that having a good running game will open up the passing game.

My concern is that we won't try. That we'll be so focused on pounding the rock we won't be versatile. That's what I'm looking for, I guess. Balance. Let's attack with the run, with the air, let's blitz, let's mixup zone and man-to-man.

I think you need to be versatile to win in this league.

Not criticising Herm Edwards for anything since December '07.

by Ridiculous Matt on Jan 17, 2008 1:13 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Note to Above:
I think Gailey could implement all of the listed elements and be a great coordinator. This isn't a knock on the hire, just pointing out something so everyone can quit saying the same thing.

"We have to fix the o-line."

Yes, we know.

The only person that doesn't know that is Kyle Turley. Because he's too busy counting his money.

Not criticising Herm Edwards for anything since December '07.

by Ridiculous Matt on Jan 17, 2008 11:27 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

With even an average o-line
Our offense jumps to at least middle of the pack, instead of dead last. I keep mentioning it because it is far and away the biggest missing piece to our offensive puzzle.

We have a other needs on offense -- blocking tight end, another good WR. Rebuilding our offensive line isn't going to solve all of our problems but it will go a long way towards that.

by Chris on Jan 17, 2008 11:36 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Best reaction to this hire I've read yet:
Big props to FIDDLINGWHILEJIMROMEBURNS on this take.  Well played.

Ever seen Apocalypse Now? Remember Charlie Steiner in the Y2K ESPN commercial? Have you expereince a bad acid trip?
Combine all 3...now you know what my evening was like after I heard Chan Gailey had been hired. My couch is still smouldering on the front lawn and there's a decapitated water buffalo in the garage.
[Brando] The horror...the horror...[/Brando]

by Bill Grigsbys Cirrhosis on Jan 17, 2008 12:07 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Overreaction
I can understand why someone may not agree with the hiring but why the venom? Is his coaching record really that despicable to some people?

by Chris on Jan 17, 2008 12:20 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree...
with him to an extent.  We just went to the Baskin Robbins, had 31 flavors to choose from and bought ourselves a big scoop of sugar fee, reduced fat, vanilla ice cream.

by Bill Grigsbys Cirrhosis on Jan 17, 2008 12:23 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You could use that analogy
Doesn't mean the sugar free is bad for you.

I think that quoted comment above is a typical overreaction that a certain number of fans have in response to anything the Chiefs do.

by Chris on Jan 17, 2008 12:29 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Think of what the reaction...
will be if the Chiefs bring in Pennington?  

by Bill Grigsbys Cirrhosis on Jan 17, 2008 12:35 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ha
I don't even want to imagine what I would say if that happened. Moves like that shake your faith in a franchise.

by Chris on Jan 17, 2008 12:38 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Chan...
I wouldn't say he is "Reduced Fat"

by c rag on Jan 17, 2008 12:49 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The only
problem is he hired himself with offensive knowledge.

by Eric on Jan 17, 2008 12:26 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Why dont we
Just get excited and see what happens?

by Lanier63 on Jan 17, 2008 12:51 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Great Idea!
Might be a little risky for some though.

by Halfbreed5050 on Jan 17, 2008 1:28 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Not risky, safe
There are people with every team that love the team, but they really like being right.

The chances of their team not being good enough to make the playoffs is greater than the chance that their team will since only 12 teams out of 32 can go to the playoffs each year.

So its safer for people to be negative and belittle their team because theres a pretty good chance their team won't make it in the end and they can say "I told you so".  And if the team does good and wins, everyones so happy that no one remembers all the negativity and they don't have to account for it.

I work in shipping and the Fed Ex driver that picks up our packages is a season ticket holder and dyed in the wool Jason Whitlock disciple.  All he ever talks about is how much he hates King Carl or Herm or how he thinks we need the greates free agents or the sexiest draft pick.  But no matter who is running the Chiefs, he would still have this opinion because its safe.

Its much riskier being optimistic and to hope and trust in your team.

by DJ on Jan 17, 2008 5:56 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I do not
like Herm never have from the beginning. I still pounded the floor with every loss still jumped around when we scored. I love my team and we should have the right to criticize when there are things we see that we feel is not in the best interest of the team. Yet I am trying to stay positive.

by Eric on Jan 17, 2008 6:44 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Not really talking about you
There is a difference between people who are always negative about everything (my Fed Ex guy) and people who disagree with coaches, players or managment.

Everyone is entitled to their opinions.  I'm talking about the guy you go to sit down and watch a game with and every play he's cursing the players, even when they do something good.

by DJ on Jan 17, 2008 6:55 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

My FedEx guy
is always negative about the Chiefs too.

Casual fans I would say.

by primetime 07 on Jan 17, 2008 8:40 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

FedEx
is it the same guy, or do delivery drivers in general suck as fans? kidding...but that's kinda weird.

by PVChiefsfan on Jan 17, 2008 9:46 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Come on guys
Im a driver for Fedex, but I work afternoons and do pickups.  Do you guys know the names of these drivers?

by Tom Bahali on Jan 18, 2008 11:33 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Clark Hunt
I only caught what Soren Petro said about the interview and what he said was that Clark said in not so many words was that the team had to show improvement or there would be changes. That is what Soren said of the interview.

by Eric on Jan 17, 2008 1:06 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It almost sounded like an ultimatum
But what else was he supposed to say after a 4-12 season?

by Chris on Jan 17, 2008 2:14 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

After looking at the transcript
Something interesting did come up. When asked about Dr. Peterson finishing his contract, Clark Hunt said, "That's a decision we'll make down the road and not something that's appropriate to comment on now."

Now that's not the typical response. I don't see Carl leaving before then though. Two years is a short enough time for Clark Hunt to let Carl Peterson ride out his twenty-year stint as Chiefs Pres. and GM, almost no matter what happens.

by Chris on Jan 17, 2008 2:19 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I would
imagine another horrible season losing the way we did not being competitive at all will cost Carl his job at the end of this season. Do you think maybe Gailey read between the lines somewhere that maybe he would have a chance to take over this team if it was a bad season? New GM would more than likely want his own coach though. Just a thouhgt.

by Eric on Jan 17, 2008 3:06 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It may have crossed his mind
But I don't think it factored into his final decision to accept the OC position with us. Gailey may have thought, "Well that would be nice" but I don't think he expects it to happen.

by Chris on Jan 17, 2008 3:12 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He has a
"doctorate in Administration in Higher Education at UCLA in `70." Check it here.

by Chris on Jan 17, 2008 7:09 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It could
seems like Gailey is a coordinator for a while then becomes a Head coach again. Not fond of Herm, really not fond of Carl. Twenty years is a plenty long to get to a Superbowl good try could not do it see ya.

by Eric on Jan 17, 2008 3:20 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hey I got a caption
for the top oicture of Gailey(Damn it Herm I am all about the running game, but this punting on third down has got to stop!)

by Eric on Jan 17, 2008 4:27 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Why do I get the feeling...
...that this hire was more about nurturing Brodie and breaking him in gently than about creating a solid offense overall?

If I'm right, WHY we continue babying this QB is beyond me.  Sure, he's got a gun of an arm, but that doesn't give you much if you lack the brain, strategy, leadership qualities and passion for the game that good QBs have in spades.

by gritsnyc on Jan 17, 2008 8:18 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think it's only fair
to give him one full season as the starter.  If there's isn't a large improvement then his status on the team needs to be seriously addressed.

by primetime 07 on Jan 17, 2008 8:42 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Full season
with decent protection. From what I read he did not even have that in college.

by Eric on Jan 17, 2008 9:36 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If we give him a decent o-line
and he still doesn't do well, we will probably be sitting in a similar position and can use our top 10 draft pick on a QB

by PVChiefsfan on Jan 17, 2008 9:48 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Perhaps...
...but my patience as a Chiefs fan is growing very, very thin.

by gritsnyc on Jan 17, 2008 10:17 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What are we going to do?
I don't know about you guys, but I grew up a Chiefs fan and am incapable of switching to another team.

So its either stop watching football altogether, which I have no interest in doing, or grin and bear it.

I figure I've got at least 30 or 40 more years of life left and will be watching the Chiefs each of those years.  Sometimes they'll be good, sometimes they'll be bad.  I'm still watching.

by DJ on Jan 17, 2008 10:31 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yea
just might be beating on the floor with my cane.(Damn it sonny run with a purpose!) Still got at least 30 years before that happens.

by Eric on Jan 18, 2008 8:18 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That's the thing
I'm incapable of switching to another team either.  My life and blood pressure completely revolve around the Chiefs -- hell, I rescheduled my wedding to accommodate the home/away games, much to the confusion of my British in-laws.  My friends (most of whom could care less about sports in general) know better than to ask even the simplest question about football because I will go off into a 20-minute discussion.  When my brother called me today, he filled me in on the Chiefs news before informing me our cousin is pregnant -- priorities, you know.  So on, so forth.

I say my patience is running thin -- not because I'm going to stop being a fan (physically impossible) but because I don't think the Chiefs front office really gives two hoots about the folks who are, arguably, some of the most loyal, devoted fans in the NFL.  And THAT, quite frankly, pisses me off.

The only way we as fans can show displeasure is by being vocal and, more importantly, keeping our valuable dollars away from the team.  Football is, after all, a business first and foremost.  Money talks and we should use that power until they shape up.

We don't have to win the Super Bowl every year.  We don't even have to be at the top of the division consistently.  But what we've been getting for the last 10 seasons or so (roughly) has been garbage.  That, to me, is insulting and heartbreaking.

For point of comparison, I don't remember feeling this angry ever before -- even in the lowly 80s.  Of course, I was a teenager then...

by gritsnyc on Jan 18, 2008 2:20 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

just so we're clear
I don't think anyone on this board should be criticizing anyone else for how they treat their fandom.

Yes, there are people that are negative all the time. They're called "AOL commenters."

My concern here is there's been a growing movement that any criticism of anyone is doused with "you're just negative," "You just need to be patient, little one", and "why can't you guys just get excited about a five time retread with little imagination on his resume!"

I'm not saying I don't like the hire. I still like the hire.

I just think that everything is not peachy keen in Chiefs-land just because we all know our O-line sucks. That doesn't just wipe out the season, or the horrible performances by the team as a whole.

And I think we have just as much right to be critical when our team is just out and out bad and when they make decisions that frustrate us as much as we have the right to cheer and support our players and coaches.  Whatever your opinion, you get to have it.  

I knew Chiefs fans during the 13-3 year that said we were going to blow it, and every game we were just "waiting for the meltdown."

I loved that year. Yeah, our defense was soft, and we didn't have the overall team play to win a Super Bowl. That was still a great year. An exciting year.

The Mid 90s? Same thing.

I can be optimistic about next season. I'm excited about the draft (though the first pick lineman is going to disappoint me), and looking forward to moving on with some new faces.  And my boy Jarrad Page is going to kill it next year.

But I don't have an issue with anyone being negative about this team. We do look pretty lost at this point. A good draft and a few quality free agents will change all that.

But let's can it with the "Well, some fans just aren't as good as me." talk.  It's arrogant, unfair, condescending (I know, I know, pot,kettle, etc. I'm trying to get better), and it limits the ability of some people to make their opinions known. Which, you know, is kind of what this place is about, next to Chris' fantastic news reporting.

Okay, that's all I've got.

Oh, and LJ sucks. I'm taking the gloves off on this. Until he comes back and shows some fire, desire, or (gasp) work ethic, I'm off this guy.

Not criticising Herm Edwards for anything since December '07.

by Ridiculous Matt on Jan 18, 2008 9:58 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Welcome back
the REAL Mawk! I enjoy your insight and the sarcasm too!

by Eric on Jan 18, 2008 10:05 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

A big part of it too
Is that we haven't had a year like this in 20 years.  People don't know what to think.  I know Chiefs fans are known for being pessimistic, but now that pessimism is out in full force.

by primetime 07 on Jan 18, 2008 10:22 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Right on, right on...
...because ain't no one going to get this pushy broad to shut her mouth.  :)

Thanks for saying that.

by gritsnyc on Jan 18, 2008 2:23 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree
I agree MAWK, but I think you as well as anyone should know that some people can take things too far and have unreasonable expectations.

Those that are more optimistic can express their opinions as well and shouldn't be criticized or mocked for that either.

I'm not a big bandwagon guy and if I see a mob forming for what I personally believe is the wrong reason, I don't get out of the way.

Some people don't like Herm or LJ or whoever because of things that have nothing to do with football.  That's fine if those people have that opinion, but it shouldn't cloud their perception of what really is going on with the team.

by DJ on Jan 18, 2008 5:16 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Agree
We should all express our opinions, that's the way we learn in our society through communication between two or more interested parties.  I would hope that the negative doesn't outweigh the positive in the end or this would look like the comment section below every KC Star article.
I came to this site, 1 for information I couldn't get elsewhere and 2, for the insight each of you place into "our" team.  I haven't had this much fun with the Chief's since I began following them on their arrival in 1964. Yes I was raised on DA Chiefs by my daddy, rest his soul.
So to all of you I say, although I may disagree with your opinion occasionally, I appreciate your willingness to stand up for your thoughts on the team.  We have a great group of contributers here led by Chris, and I look forward to opening the site up each and every day.

Go Chiefs!

by Lanier63 on Jan 18, 2008 10:14 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That is
a long time I was not even born then, hell not even thought of then for that matter. You a have seen the highs and lows, this era of Chiefs football must make you nervous.

by Eric on Jan 18, 2008 10:23 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I am a fireman
I don't get nervous about very much anymore, just kind of slow down and ponder the situation before I act.
The mid to late seventies and early eighties were the most strenuous as a fan.  But hey, we all made it through one way or another.
This team is going to be just fine and whether we go 4-12, 7-9, 10-6 or even 15-1 we are going to have fun and get excited every time that kickoff is sent to the return man.

by Lanier63 on Jan 18, 2008 10:28 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Unless it is Drummond!
Yea I live for Sundays, and hate it when it is over! I would love to see an opening day win this season, but then I might be disappointed the rest of the season!

by Eric on Jan 18, 2008 10:31 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It won't be
1) I don't think that we are in THAT bad of a position and 2) Carl and Herm would be gone waaaayyy before we had a decade of suckiness.

by PVChiefsfan on Jan 18, 2008 12:18 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I keep hearing people say that
I keep hearing people talk about returning to the 80s and it blows my mind.

The Chiefs had one bad year.  Year before last we were in the playoffs, year before that we should have been.  Year before that we were talking about how the Chiefs might go undefeated.

Bad years happen and if you think about it.  What better year to go 4-12 than the year the Patriots were 16-0?

You know who this year sucks for?  San Diego Chargers.  They are at their peak and sooner or later salary cap is going to hit them and they'll start declining.  But they are at their peak while the Pats are at theirs.

by DJ on Jan 18, 2008 5:20 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I cannot wait
to see Rivers get abused, he is a trash talking punk! Next season I want to see DJ or Jared level him!

by Eric on Jan 18, 2008 5:31 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You might not be able to
he has a partially torn ACL.  I'm not really sure what the recovery time is thoug.  I would love to see Jared take him out and do his hog tie over Rivers tore up body!!!!!

by Tom Bahali on Jan 18, 2008 11:12 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Would Antion Gates
cry about Rivers after the game?  I'd pay a lot of money to see that.

by PVChiefsfan on Jan 19, 2008 12:03 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He is
going to be to bust crying for himself! TG can play through a whole season with a cracked foot but two games is a stretch with a dislocated toe, come on you gotta want it!

by Eric on Jan 19, 2008 12:32 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog!
Start posting about the Chiefs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Chiefs_small
"Twas the Night Before Football"
P1_extra_bmm_1stcast_may08_small
"53"

Recent FanPosts

Zachdixiebama-0030-2_small
Chiefs Sack Leader Poll
Img_1134_small
Steve McNair is dead at 36
Small
A look back (Herm years)
Small
the 53 Man Roster
Pict0200_small
BECAUSE I'M BORED LET'S PLAY GM FOR THE DAY
Kcchiefsd_small
Happy Independence Day!!!
Images2_small
A Rockin Chiefs Post
Images2_small
Pioli pulls the Trigger
Small
2009 AP Fantasy League(s)?
Chiefs_small
2009 Season

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Editors

Arrowhead_pride_small Chris

Tg_small primetime 07

Contributors

Ajax_small ChiefDJ

Brodie_small Official Arrowhead Pride Parade

N505381175_257425_5488_small connerman

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports