The Kansas City Chiefs Current Draft Spot
UPDATE Monday PM: The coin flip process is confirmed by NFL.com.
Now everyone can stop speculating (or you never did speculate if you came here). The coin flips are traditionally done at the NFL combine at the end of February.
Where will the Chiefs draft in 2008 you ask? Here's the current scenario, with tiebreakers to come.
1. Miami (1-15)
2. St. Louis (3-13)
3T. Atlanta (4-12)
3T. Kansas City (4-12)
3T. Oakland (4-12)
6. New York Jets (4-12)
7. New England (from San Francisco) (5-11)
8. Baltimore (5-11)
The Chiefs are currently tied for the third draft pick, with the final result dependent on one or two coin flips. Major props to cdcox from Chiefs Planet for the following breakdown. Its the first place I saw it.
Now who should pick first between Oakland and Atlanta. Here the tiebreaker is a coin flip since Atlanta and Oakland are not in the same conference or the same division.
If Atlanta wins the coin flip they will pick 3rd. Oakland will pick 4th because the have to pick before KC. And we will pick 5th.
If Oakland wins the coin flip agains Atlanta, they will pick 3rd. Who picks 4th and 5th? Again we would need a coin flip between KC and Atlanta to determine this.
Note: Here is the official wording on why the Raiders will automatically pick before us:
2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.
3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games.
Therefore, we cannot pick before the Raiders and since the Raiders and Falcons are in different conferences, a coin flip will determine who gets what spot ahead of the Chiefs. Then, like cdcox said, if the Raiders win the flip with the Falcons, the Chiefs and Falcons will have to flip because they're not in the same conference.
Make sense? What my previous breakdown of the draft order didn't really take into account was the strength of schedule of each team changing so much. That's why it's not exactly falling into line with what's actually happening.
0 recs |
10 comments
Comments
We
by Eric on
Dec 31, 2007 8:14 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
So many different places
by Chris on
Dec 31, 2007 8:16 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
A few notes
It seems to be up in the air which tiebreakers to use.
If you look at the following which stands under "TIE-BREAKING PROCEDURE FOR SELECTION MEETING" we should pick before the raiders because we have the same division record, but they have a better conference record.
QUOTE:
"If any ties cannot be broken by strength of schedule, the divisional or conference tie breakers, whichever are applicable, are applied. Any ties that still exist are broken by a coin flip."
QUOTE ends
The tiebreakers regarding the common games scenarion, which have been mentioned, are tied to determain playoff teams and has nothing to do with the draft (also in the link posted below).
qoute
"TO BREAK A TIE WITHIN A DIVISION (for playoffs)
If, at the end of the regular season, two or more clubs in the same division finish with identical won-lost-tied percentages, the following steps will be taken until a champion is determined.
Two Clubs
- Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs).
- Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.
- Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games."
TIE-BREAKING PROCEDURE FOR SELECTION MEETING
If two or more clubs are tied in the selection order, the strength-of-schedule tie breaker is applied, subject to the following exceptions for playoff clubs:
- The Super Bowl winner is last and the Super Bowl loser next-to-last.
- Any non-Super Bowl playoff club involved in a tie shall be assigned priority within its segment below that of non-playoff clubs and in the order that the playoff clubs exited from the playoffs. Thus, within a tied segment a playoff club that loses in the Wild-Card game will have priority over a playoff club that loses in the Divisional playoff game, which in turn will have priority over a club that loses in the Conference Championship game. If two tied clubs exited the playoffs in the same round, the tie is broken by strength of schedule.
by jimme on
Dec 31, 2007 9:33 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
"whichever are applicable"
As far as I can tell, this situation is a pretty new one.
by Chris on
Dec 31, 2007 9:43 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think this statement is even more key
Is it just me, or is that statement hilarious?
by styg50 on
Dec 31, 2007 6:14 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
RE
by Chris on
Dec 31, 2007 10:13 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Some news from nfl.com
Your original report was correct.
by jimme on
Dec 31, 2007 2:20 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs














