Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dog Football! Which Breeds Are Best Suited For The Gridiron?

AFC West Round Up

Oakland Raiders (2-5)

This past weekend, the Raiders lost to the Titans 13 to 9 in a game that featured Vince Young passing for 42 yards, 14 penalties by by the Raiders and a Mike Williams drop on 4th down at the end of the game that sealed the fate of Oakland.

The Raiders had two turnovers to the Titans none, which puts the Raiders at -6 for the season in the turnover ratio. Daunte Culpepper passed for 167 yards and threw one pick. How the Titans won this game with Vince Young only completing six passes is beyond me. Well, actually it isn't. I caught a good portion of this game and the Tennessee defensive line, DT Albert Haynesworth especially, were constantly in the backfield of the Raiders.

The Raiders had more first downs; a higher 3rd down conversion rate; held the ball for five minutes longer than the Titans; and gained more total yards than the Titans. But the Raiders could not get into the end zone. They settled for three Sebastian Janikowski field goals and the loss.

I'm getting very close to discounting the Raiders entirely this season. Their offense is worse than ours. Well, maybe not that bad but they've been unable to get into the red zone against good defenses this year. Ladies and gentlemen, I think we have our last place AFC West team right here.

Denver Broncos (3-4)

I must confess I didn't see this game but judging from what I read, it followed the Denver Bronco 2007 season plot line to a T in a 19 to 13 loss to the Packers last night.

Yet again, the fate of the Broncos rested on a Jason Elam kick with time expiring. Yet again, Elam hit the kick but this time it was for the tie, not the win. Elam's kick sent the game to overtime where, on the first play from scrimmage, Brett Favre hit Greg Jennings for an 82 yard touchdown pass for the Green Bay win.

The Packers committed thirteen penalties and unlike the Raiders, were actually able to pull out a win. The Packers win is easily summed up by Brett Favre's two touchdown passes of 79 and 82 yards respectfully. If the Broncos don't give up just one of those bombs, the outcome of the game is probably different. Also, if the Broncos don't fumble the ball on the Green bay one-yard line in the second quarter, they also stand a much better chance of winning last night's game. The Packers did not turn the ball over and there you go. Green Bay wins.

The wolves are already descending on the Denver Broncos. Faced with a sub .500 season through seven games, many Bronco fans have already justified the results of 2007 as a "rebuilding" year. Injuries and age have not been kind to the 2007 Broncos. The Broncos really do have trouble finishing games, don't they?

San Diego Chargers (4-3)

Welcome to the party, San Diego. After starting the season 1-3, the Chargers have won three games to sit tied atop the AFC West with our beloved Chiefs.

The Chargers fourth win of the season came at the brutal expense of the Houston Texans, who the Chargers walloped 35 to 10 on Sunday. A rather unimpressive offense day numbers-wise from the Chargers was offset by the Texans' five turnovers, with Matt Schaub and Sage Rosenfels both throwing two interceptions a piece.

Philip Rivers passed for three touchdowns, two of them to Antonio Gates and one to the newly minted Charger Chris Chambers. The Chargers also scored two defensive touchdowns, one on a botched Texan punt and the other on a 70-yard INT return for a touchdown.

The things went the Chargers way this week and they were still able to sit back and relax in the second half. San Diego is back in the rhythm I expected them to be in all season long. They have a tough go of it over the next three weeks, as they play the Vikings (great run defense), the Colts and the Jags. Expect the Chargers to be the only serious competitors for the Chiefs in the AFC West.

Comment 17 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Could this have worked out
any better for us Monday night?

The Broncos lose, the Packers look beatable, and we get to rest when they're on a short week.

This all looks good for us.

I know numbers aren't everything, but the sheer eternity between our +/- PF-PA compared to the Chargers is more than a little frightening.

I'm just going to keep my fingers crossed that the Norv Turner effect comes into play.

by Ridiculous Matt on Oct 30, 2007 11:47 AM CDT reply actions  

Congrats on the wedding
Getting married on the bye week.  Gotta love that commitment.

by Joel Thorman on Oct 30, 2007 4:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes
Congrats on the timing MAWK. Is she a Chiefs fan?

by Chris Thorman on Oct 30, 2007 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks all
She's converting.

Also, it made my brief honeymoon much less stressful not to be screaming "Law, for the love of God, stay with your man!"

by Ridiculous Matt on Oct 30, 2007 10:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Chargers
have the Vikings, Colts, and Jags but then the tough road continues when they host the Ravens and then travel here and to Tennessee.  I guess that's what you get when you go 14-2.  The Broncos look real bad against the run and seem to have trouble pressuring the QB, so it doesn't matter if they have the best pair of corners in the game (who, BTW, got smoked once each)...the opposing QB doesn't even have to force one against Bly and Bailey.

by PVChiefsfan on Oct 30, 2007 12:10 PM CDT reply actions  

The Ravens
are not so hot. They're having lots of trouble with good teams. The Jags came together last week over a fading Tampa team, but I think the Chargers can take them. It's a coin flip with us. We seem to have their number, but you never know.

It's going to come down to both teams winning the games they should (Denver, Oakland, Minnesota, etc.)

That Lions game late in the year looks daunting all of a sudden.

by Ridiculous Matt on Oct 30, 2007 12:23 PM CDT reply actions  

QUESTION
Does anyone think we have a chance against the colts or the pats? The reason i ask is, if we beat out the Chargers for the division we will still have to face one of theese teams.
Derrick Thomas- G.O.A.T

by D Thomas on Oct 30, 2007 12:54 PM CDT reply actions  

Not to be overly optimistic
but remember...Any Given Sunday.  We have to face the Colts in the regular season so that should give us some idea of how we would fare in the postseason.  Now, I agree, the likelihood of us beating the Patriots is not great...but it could happen.  Even great players have off days (Hopefully Manning will have one against us in a few weeks).

by PVChiefsfan on Oct 30, 2007 1:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

RE
If college football has taught us anything this year about competition, its that any team can beat any team any day of the week.

by Chris Thorman on Oct 30, 2007 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well
in the back of my mind I think our defence can cause enough turnovers to beat any team. The only issue is, the pats are averaging what 40 pts per game.
Derrick Thomas- G.O.A.T

by D Thomas on Oct 30, 2007 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

No
Not at all.

Not ever.

Not on any given Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Friday, or the last Thursday in November.

Not in a box, not with the sawx.

Not in our house, not if Brady was a louse.

I offer as evidence for the Colts, 2004, 2007. I offer for the Pats the fact that they are not of this world, and may very well break the league.

We could get six turnovers and still not beat either of these teams. Our offense might go backwards.

I respect the "anything can happen" argument, because it's been proven. But the most honest answer I can give is that there is no way in heaven, hell, or anywhere in between that we beat either of those teams with the squad we have now.

If we beat out the Chargers for the division, we need to focus on beating the Steelers/Ravens/Jags/Chargers in the first round.

If we win that game, I will be thrilled with having the monkey off our back.

Then I can start practicing voodoo for the next week.

I know you guys can, and I actually want to hear the answers to this.

Give me 5 reasons why we can beat either one that does not involve the following phrases, "You never know.", "Any given sunday.", "Anything can happen.", "Stranger things have happened.", "We have Damon Huard."

by Ridiculous Matt on Oct 30, 2007 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

MAWK
We can beat them because on any given Sunday we have Damon Huard. You never know, stranger things have happened.
Derrick Thomas- G.O.A.T

by D Thomas on Oct 30, 2007 2:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Colts
In 2004 they beat us because we had no defense (we lucked into 13-3) and in 2007 they beat us because we had no offense.  Now we have a fairly good defense and I think by the time we play the colts it will be even better.  If we can put together a complete game (good defense, decent offense) without turnovers, we beat the Colts...the Patriots are another matter altogether.  They're just ridiculous.

by PVChiefsfan on Oct 30, 2007 4:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

slim to none
As of this week:

The Chiefs average 14.6 points per game, are ranked #27 in Offense, and #11 in Defense.

Patriots 41.4 points per game, ranked #1 in Offense, and #3 in Defense.

Colts 32 points per game, ranked #3 in Offense, and #4 in Defense.

Simply put, the Patriots and Colts are the 2 best teams in all of football.  Not only do they have explosive offenses that are averaging 2 or 3 times more points per game than the Chiefs, they also have defenses that are at the top of the league.

You can be optimistic with the "any given Sunday" argument and there is always the chance, but realistically you have to look at how complete those two teams are with the many holes in the Chiefs team...  Chances are slim to none.

by DJ @ Arrowhead Pride on Oct 30, 2007 8:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think it would be one thing
if we'd even managed to hang with Indy either time. But we haven't. We've been run over. Even the no punt game which was close, never seemed like we had a chance.

I guess I just don't see our offense which as been mediocre versus average defenses being great, or even decent against great defenses.

Maybe I'm just being negative.

by Ridiculous Matt on Oct 30, 2007 10:54 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog! Follow us on Facebook and on Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Calabaloo_small
Reviewing AP's Predictions For The Chiefs 2011 Season
Small
Some clarity on Peyton's injury
Crennelgatoradebathposterizedrough_small
Brian Daboll: Another Perspective
Dxmcc_copy_small
Why Drafting Robert Griffin Is Not Optional For The Kansas City Chiefs

Recent FanPosts

Dbs_oak_991_10_23_11_small
10 Bold Predictions For The Chiefs 2012-2013 Season
10452014-small_small
My Favorite Chiefs- Defense (1980's-Present Edition)
Small
Prospect Mockery. 02/15/2012
Small
Expectations for SB under Cassel/Orton
Winning_me_small
Chief Concern
Small
Trade Scenario with DT Glenn Dorsey
Nfl_u_okoye_200_small
Kansas City=Elite Defense?
Supernova1007_small
Triplettes
Dbs_oak_991_10_23_11_small
What Stanford Routt-Chiefs Visit Means
Small
What if.........

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

23247_617116905_1805_n_small Chris Thorman

Headshot_small Joel Thorman

Editors

Matt_ssv_pic_small_small Matt Conner

Stag_20silhouette_small stagdsp

288-chiefstexans0944_sp_8-15-09_jfs woodman212

Lips-rhps_small upamtn

Contributors

Small Jon Yoon

Kc_ny_small NJ Chiefs Fan

Phoenix_by_melen_small KaloPhoenix

N1358340181_30185582_5800_small Flowers24

Dirkness_small HisDirkness

Cassel_small Steve_in_RI