Kansas City Chiefs roster cuts begin; who's next?

US PRESSWIRE

The Kansas City Chiefs kicked off the offseason by releasing Steve Breaston and Kevin Boss. They have to be salary cap compliant by March 12, which they already are, but other players could be cut before the new league year. What other cuts could be coming down the pipe?

In a cap casualty piece last week, I predicted that Kevin Boss would return to the Kansas City Chiefs in 2013 and that Steve Breaston had a shot of returning. Of course both were cut on Tuesday. The Chiefs have plenty of cap space and more coming with veteran cuts presumably on the way but it's still possible that money played a big role in the decision to cut both Breaston and Boss. Those two were the 7th and 8th highest paid Chiefs -- in terms of 2013 salary, not total size of the contract -- for the upcoming 2013 season.


More: Chiefs fans split on Breaston | Boss bounced, too


Tyson Jackson ($14.72 million)
Tamba Hali ($12.25 million)
Matt Cassel ($7.5 million)
Brandon Flowers ($7.35 million)
Eric Berry ($7.009 million)
Eric Winston ($4.9 million)
Steve Breaston ($3.8 million)
Kevin Boss ($2.4 million)

Derrick Johnson ($2.25 million)
Andy Studebaker ($2.005 million)

(Numbers via Spotrac)

Uspw_5775242_medium
Stew Milne-USA TODAY Sports

Take a good look at that list. A regime change always means lots of changes. It means a new coach may not recognize the leadership skills Studebaker brings. Or he may not be a fan of the Chiefs secondary. Or, as we've already seen, may not like a certain receiver or tight end on the roster. Big changes are coming either way -- the money will just help make those decisions quicker.

Here's how I labeled a few of the highest paid Chiefs in a post last week:

Big money but they're safe: Hali, Flowers, Berry

Makes me wonder: Boss, Breaston, Studebaker, Ryan Succop ($1.925 million), Kendrick Lewis ($1.323 million)

They're in trouble: Cassel, Jackson

The names that jump out at me are obviously Matt Cassel and Tyson Jackson.

156281711_medium
Gregory Shamus Getty Images Sport

Cassel's situation is a little trickier. The quarterback market is so bad that I don't think you can say Cassel will be cut for sure. Likely? Yeah. But not definitely. I seem to be the only one in town saying Cassel's release is not automatic.

Tyson Jackson's release would double the Chiefs cap space.

The decision on Tyson Jackson is easier. He doesn't play a premium position and his release will double the Chiefs cap room. Yes, you read that right: releasing Tyson Jackson would more than double the Chiefs available salary cap space. So let me ask you: do you think the Chiefs are going to release Tyson Jackson? It's possible they could keep him but nowhere near that number (his actual cap number is even higher at $17+ million).

I don't mind the Chiefs making veteran cuts as long as it's done with a purpose. I didn't like a couple of the recent years with the Chiefs where they cut veterans, replaced them with cheaper veterans and put up a poor record on the field. Sure, you saved some money but your team sucks. I'm hoping the Chiefs big picture plan is to create the cap flexibility so that they can prepare for the return of both Branden Albert and Dwayne Bowe, whether that comes via a longterm contract or the franchise tag. It's great to save some money ... assuming you're not saving that money just to save it.


X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

Join Arrowhead Pride

You must be a member of Arrowhead Pride to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Arrowhead Pride. You should read them.

Join Arrowhead Pride

You must be a member of Arrowhead Pride to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Arrowhead Pride. You should read them.

Spinner

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker