FanPost

Do it NOW!

OK, we’re coming down to the wire. The draft is a scant two weeks away. The KC brain trust has some decisions to make. Is DeCastro the guy we want? What do we do if Richardson falls to #11? What about Tannehill? In my opinion, our best option entails machinating the draft so as to select Weeden as a value pick. Weeden reminds me of a QB drafted back in ’91 by the Falcons, in the second round. This QB’s name was Brett Favre.

Many Chiefs’ fans want to wait until next year to take a QB in the first round. Their reasoning is that there will be anywhere from four to six excellent QBs available. I see two problems with this line of reasoning; first, with Cassel and the team he will have around him, the Chiefs should win 9 or 10 games this year (Cassel isn’t as bad as Jamie Dukes thinks; he just isn’t a good QB). Cassel won’t lose games for the Chiefs, but he won’t win games, either. ..but I digress; back to the plan of drafting a QB in ’13, we should be drafting somewhere in the 20’s. Considering that there could be as many as seven teams looking for a QB; Buffalo, Arizona (if Kolb doesn’t get things going), Jacksonville, SF (if Smith is, as some suspect, a one-year wonder), Seattle (if Flynn turns out to be over-rated), Minnesota (if they come to the realization that they reached too far for Ponder), and Miami (if Cleveland jumps up to take Tannehill this year), drafting in the 20’s may well be too low to land one of the top QB’s. The problem with the plan is that trading up usually is rather expensive. Secondly, maybe there won’t be that many excellent QBs next year. One or two of the highly-rated QBs will have off-seasons, and their warts will become visible. "Never put off until tomorrow what you can do today" said that well-known football analyst, Ben Franklin.

This is why I think we need to move on Weeden this year. Because we are drafting relatively high, we could well have several offers to trade down in the first round (we could trade up in the second round; that has the advantage of denying the opposition a chance to counter the move, but we’d be losing draft picks, not gaining draft picks). Whether we trade up or down, I think we need to position ourselves somewhere between #30 and #35. I’m assuming we need to be ahead of Cleveland in the second round. Of course, Cleveland could throw a monkey wrench into the plan if they used their second pick in round 1 (#22) to take Weeden. I just don’t see Pioli taking Weeden that high; it wouldn’t be a "value pick".





This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Arrowhead Pride

You must be a member of Arrowhead Pride to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Arrowhead Pride. You should read them.

Join Arrowhead Pride

You must be a member of Arrowhead Pride to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Arrowhead Pride. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker