It's Time
I was born in 1984. Since then I have seen the Chargers go to a Super Bowl. I have seen the Raiders go to a Super Bowl. And I have seen the Broncos go to and win TWO Super Bowls. We haven't won a playoff game in nearly 20 years. And we haven't been to a Super Bowl in over 40 years. It's time Pioli. It's time Clark. It is time Romeo.
Looking back I can only think of two QB's in that time that were at least legitimate. An aging Montana, and an above average Trent Green. We had Gannon (who was a backup), and chose Grbac. Gannon lead the Raiders to a Super Bowl. Everything I'm saying is common knowledge(except my birthday) and fact.
I will always follow my beloved Chiefs, but no more will I sit back and think another castoff, average QB can get us to the promised land. Pioli can not sell me on Cassel. There is 4 years of Cassel as a starter now on tape. By now it should be pretty clear that Cassel is inconsistent and cant lead or carry a team to victory. 2009 was evident that Cassel can't succeed without talent. But what QB can. In 2010 it was clear Cassel can be effective when his players stay healthy. Any QB can. In 2011 it was clear Cassel is inconsistent, average, and can't put a team on his back. Especially when key players are hurt.
You know who can do these things? Good to Great Quarterbacks. Both Manning's, Aaron Rodgers, and Drew Brees make household names out of otherwise unspectacular players. Peyton went to two Super Bowls. One with Harrison and Reggie. The other with Pierre Garcon and Austin Collie? Eli has now won two Super Bowls. One with Plaxico Burress and Steve Smith. The other with Victor Cruz, Hakeem Nicks, and Mario Manningham? Aaron Rodgers has Jennings, and Driver. He also has made Jordy Nelson a name. Brees has had pretty much the same group of guys for awhile and all are really no namers without Brees throwing them the ball. And yes even Marques Colston wouldn't be anyone without Brees. These men can lead a team with or without special players. These men also every year lead their team to division titles and playoffs. These men also every year are threats to be talked about with getting to the Super Bowl. Hell even Roethlisberger has lead his team to three super bowls with different recievers next to Ward. Plus I'm leaving Brady out of this because he is an acception to this rule. Not every late round QB in todays world is the next Brady.
My point is that these guys can do what it takes to get to the Super Bowl. With or without star players. This is where Pioli and Hunt must try to get us a legitimate QB. We pay hard earned money to watch this team succeed. Not to try. After years of not winning and mediocrity we deserve to have a legitimate QB. Not other Grbac, Bono, Huard, Krieg. If there was a way to get Andrew Luck. Do it. If there was a way to get RG3. Do it. If Manning does become a free agent, throw money at the guy till he signs. These moves would at least be trying to get a legitimate QB instead of trotting another average QB out there to "not lose the game". I want a QB who can win the game on his own. Not check down because its safe and doesnt want to be the reason we lost. News flash!!! Because your trying to not lose you actually are the reason we are losing. Instead of trying to find ways to win the game your looking for ways to not lose the game.
Clark and Scott it's time to get the QB that can do this. At least with getting a star rookie you are at least showing you are trying to find the answer. Signing Manning shows you are honest about trying to make the team better and improve the position. Hell even Orton (although a castoff, average QB) has show in only 3 games that is far more capable at doing things a QB is suppose to do than Cassel. Do I think Orton can lead this team to the playoffs? Yes I do, and maybe even winning us one. Getting us to the Super Bowl? Not so much. Maybe if he got lucky like Cassel did in 2010 with little to none of major injuries to key players. And with the right system catering to his skill set.
Cassel is not the answer. Our answer is out there. And its last name is either Manning, Luck, or Griffin. And yes maybe even Orton. No more of this 'little team that could' crap. Go for gold or go home. After all this time it is finally...time.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.
84 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
state our opinions AND be gentle? wow, gonna be tough for some of us ;-)
terrific post … my personal preference is Orton
I dislike the idea of trading away draft picks to move up, I think we have too many other holes to fill and I believe that would weaken us in the long run
as for Manning, he’s not yet proven he can play at anything like his old level, is he can he’s still going to be very expensive just in bonus alone … although an incentive-filled contract would be the way to go, but he’s still going to cost that big bonus money up front
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
Manning
I have a feeling Manning is going to want to play somewhere warm our in a dome. I don’t think he’s going to give us any consideration. Orton is my vote.
by franzbot on Feb 6, 2012 10:17 AM CST via Android app up reply actions
Best spots for Manning
Cleveland – colder than KC
Washington – colder
SF – Okay, point taken here, but I think Harbaugh will roll with Alex Smith
KC
Go KC!
by AnkenyChiefsFan on Feb 6, 2012 3:02 PM CST up reply actions
Vikings have a dome, depends on how happy they are with their current young QB
just something to Ponder
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
Colder than KC???
Washington – colder
If it wasn’t for the accursed paycheck, would I really imprison myself in this dungeon of the human soul?
by electriclight on Feb 6, 2012 10:09 PM CST up reply actions
Why will he cost us big bonus money up front?
He will be a free agent. Structure his contract using incentives. Make it through camp. Play so many games. Make it to the playoffs. Win a playoff game. Win the conference. Etc. Manning said he is not opposed to this. The guy has money coming out of his big ears…he has endorsements up the yin yang…he wants to play…make that deal and get Manning to come here…shortest path to a SB…
Then, to make you happy, get DeCastro and a RT to protect Manning, and we will be good to go.
by AnkenyChiefsFan on Feb 6, 2012 3:00 PM CST up reply actions
I'd be beyond stunned if Manning didn't ask for (and get) a huge signing bonus
aka money up front
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
Manning contract
I heard his agent released a statement saying Manning is willing to, once a free agent, take a contract that is performance based. If he isnt healthy and doesn’t play then he wont make much at all. If he is healthy and doesnt play well then he gets a standard contract. If he plays well and healthy and hits certain achievments then he will get what you think he and we all think he will get.
Great post!
I completely feel your pain. I just don’t understand how the heck we could trade up to get RG3. Also, I saw him in person at the KU Baylor game and he looks like he has a very small frame. Like he could hit the weight room all day and never change that. As long as he doesn’t end up on the Browns, he defensively has all the skill and mental ability to achieve great things though. I just don’t know how we could realistically trade up to get him. I really think our best but this next season is to re sign Orton. I think Schmioli will end up getting some chump veteran back up QB and posses no realistic threat to Cassel though. The guy is so freaking stubborn. I have never witnessed any kind of business or organization succeed without pulling the best and brightest from many different places. Hope to hell I am wrong about that!
As far as RG3 is concerned
If there is any possible way to get him then just do it. Don’t hesitate. Don’t look back. A change at the QB position needs to happen. Look at what happened with Orton. We were so use to Huard/Cassel type play, and then an even worse apperence from Croyle/Palko that when Orton stepped in we were all stunned at what a QB is supposed to do. I have watched RG3 play. He makes good reads and feels the pocket pretty well. He doesn’t run as much as you’d think, but he is good at it for sure. His accuracy, timing, and arm strength is real. Which I thought was all inflated numbers and play, but I was wrong. The kid is good. real good. Orton can do the job I just fear another average QB being better than the average QB he replaced is all that is happening.
I agree cassel isn't the answer, but as long as Pioli is here he's going to be the starter.
Orton would give us the better chance at making a run to the big game, but it doesn’t look like he’ll be back. Especially if we hire Daboll as OC, Pioli is just saying that he wants competition at qb because that’s what the fans want to hear.
His ego won’t allow for cassel to be replaced, if he really wants him to compete he’ll bring back Orton. Luck, and Griffin are not the answer, Peyton would be interesting if he’s 100%. This team has been missing a true veteran qb, who can lead this young team. Orton or Manning would be a good choice.
by ChiefDailyBaked on Feb 6, 2012 12:28 AM CST reply actions
Luck and Griffin
How are they not the answer? Is it because they are rookies and not vets? At least with them we would be trying to get better at the QB postion. They could be molded to be better and not trying to fix someone else’s broken toys.
They are not the answer becasue what it would take to get them.
How many teams let go of multiple ‘top draft’ picks for muiltiple seasons (What it would take to get Luck / RGIII) and made it to the Super Bowl?
Take your time, I will wait.
While you wait
name 5 1st and second round picks still on the chiefs between 2000 – 2009(hell may not have that many in the NFL anymore). Someone posted all the 1st/2nd rd picks sense 2k a few weeksd ago and I would hapilly give up 2 or even three or four picks from that entire strech for a shot at RG3 or Luck. Fact is a 1st round pick can set the Chiefs back if he is a bust regardless of position.
**Heres to 5 err 4 more years of JC!!!!**
correct myself
I loked this up and you can name the last 5 years 1st rounders. If you go back before that it is bleak for a while other than John Tait
**Heres to 5 err 4 more years of JC!!!!**
How about tag/trade Bowe and our #11 pick?
If we trade these to St. Louis for their #2, maybe we could get RG3. Mocks are having St. Louis going either WR or OT first round. If we trade them Bowe, that takes care of their WR need, and they can still go O-line at #11. Either DeCastro or likely Martin or Reiff will be available. Or they can trade down further and get Adams or Sanders. They get a top 10 talent at wideout and still can address O-line, and we have our QBOTF. We won’t have Bowe, but we’ll still have Baldwin and Breaston and Copper and could maybe pick up a FA WR or two, like Colston or Wayne or someone like that.
by AnkenyChiefsFan on Feb 6, 2012 3:07 PM CST up reply actions
can't trade bowe
will the chiefs ever draft a Qb in the first round, not since todd blackledge in 83. and the chiefs could of had marino. OH well atleast 65 toss power trap worked for KC, it should be wide open red. Hank stram still the man.
by niageriannit1 on Feb 6, 2012 8:13 PM CST up reply actions
I'll give it a shot.
A lot of the Mock experts are sending RG3 to Cleveland at the #2 pick, because Cleveland has 2 first rounders.
The train of thought is that St. Louis could trade down just a couple picks and STILL be in position to get a real receiving threat (Blackmoon) that their team completely lacks.
So, in addition to a first round pick swap, they would stay high enough to get a #1 receiver.. making it a very good deal for them.
Well… the Chiefs have this #1 receiver that they could tag and trade… which would give St Louis the receiving threat they so desperately want and need. St. Louis would be taking less of a rick by taking Bowe + our #1 than they would taking Cleveland’s 2 #1’s because Bowe is a known commodity. Sure, we’d have to toss in something else to sweeten the pot a little bit… but I don’t think were talking about trading away some great glut of future draft picks.
Bowe + a little more + our #1 = St. Louis’ #1 (which becomes RG3).
A swap of 1’s, RG3 to the Chiefs… Bowe to St. Louis.. + a reasonable sweetener….
From where I sit as a fan that’s not much a price to pay for the best QB in the draft (yes.. I’ve said it before.. Ill say it again.. I like RG3 more than I like Luck)
Bowe has some dropsy issues.. nothing world ending, but issues none the less. The upside chances of a real legitimate potential franchisee QB far, far, far, far ,far outweigh the loss of Dwayne Bowe.
The Chiefs would still have Baldwin and Breaston to play as #1 and #2… with Jamaal Charles returning… McCluster can move back into his role as the slot receiver ; thereby keeping Jamaal and McCluster on the field at the same time without sacrificing forcing a fullback (McClain) lead blocker to the bench. That’s a lot of size on the outside, and a crap load of speed on the field at the same time. Toss Moeaki out there with McClain and you can run a power run game out of the same personel grouping in a no huddle offense. Force teams to match up with size (Baldwin/Moeaki) AND speed (McCluster/Breaston) as potential receivers.. AT THE SAME TIME that they have to cover a bruiser (McClain) AND a speedster (Charles) in the back field to potentially run the ball. ADD in a QB that can make all the throws, but can run like a gazelle if he’s forced to……
/drool.
Sure, it’s going to take some time for a rookie QB to develop, but for the first time in a long time I’d be looking forward to watching the Chiefs QB.. instead of hoping he doesn’t screw things up too badly to come back from.
RG3 is completely worth the risk. Settling for Orton just assures the Chiefs 3 more years of mediocrity at the QB position.
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynicism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
So, trade proven homegrown talent AND pick(s) for an unproven QB....brilliant.
Next time there is a GM spot open for an NFL team, they should take a long hard look at your arm-chair GM resume.
as opposed to ?
Signing yet another mediocre QB that isn’t going to lead the team anywhere.. (Orton) so that we can spend the next 3 years making the same excuses for Orton that every other team that’s eventually cut him have made for him his entire career?
Yeah, that’s a great plan. 3 more years of being middle of the road.. only to end up right back where we are now…. standing on the outside looking in… wishing we had a good NFL QB.
What good is a WR when you don’t have anyone to throw them the ball? A good accurate QB can throw to anybody and have success (see Peyton, Brees, Brady etc..). A good QB can train their receivers to as to when and where to be in the spots they need to be in order for a play to work. A good to great QB can make due with lesser talented receivers and still win game.
An ELITE receiver can’t to shit if the QB can’t get him the ball. Run all the perfect routes you want.. but if the QB throws it 7 yards short… or never gets to you in their read progressions to begin with…. what the hell good are you doing the team?
so YES.. I’d trade Bowe (good receiver) for the chance at a great QB in a heartbeat if that’s what it takes. As opposed to holding onto a good receiver so tightly that we’re stuck with a mediocre QB that can’t get them the ball.
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynicism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
I know, lets move up in the draft and get the next Peyton Manning. Remind me again how long it took Manning to get to a Super Bowl?
Big Ben in a great QB but if he goes down (and doesn’t play) the Steelers still win games (3-1 when Ben was out if memory serve). How can they win games like that without their “starting” Super Bowl winning QB??? Because the Steelers are a TEAM.
Its the same reason Tom Brady goes down in the first game of 2008 and Matt “Let’s run him out of town on a rail” Cassel leads them to an 11-5 season (being one of the few teams ever to win 11 games and not making to the playoffs). How can they win games like that without their “starting” super Bowl winning QB??? Becase the Patriots are a TEAM.
I can speak for everyone on AP, but I for one what the Chiefs to be a TEAM…a true ‘next man up’ orginization. You cant be a ‘next man up’ orginization when you trade draft picks before you have at least ‘roll players’ in your starting line up.
While the Chiefs have come a LONG way in a short time since Pioli took over a 2-14 team, we are not ‘there’ yet. If anything we ‘should’ trade DOWN and fill more holes this season, if QB is still the ‘elephant in the corner’ next January THEN go after your ‘franchise QB’.
The Chiefs are not ’one great QB" away from a Super Bowl team…yet. Draft well this year and we could be next.
Why wait?
I just don’t see the point in playing it safe anymore. Carl played it safe for 20 years and what does he have to show for it. Nothing. Except alot of money he earned by not living up to his promises. We have the money to fill holes with good young players. Depth is the main concern other than QB. Take care of depth and fill a few spots in FA (even QB if necessary) and then save yourself the money in the future, trading some higher picks this year and draft farther back the next year. Because by going for the future now we will still have money in the future by saving on draft picks money and spending it on guys like Bowe and Carr.
Carl overpaid year after year after year for retreded QBs, and over the hill players.
G and RT is an issue with starters (not depth)
Building via FA is uber fail (look no further then the Redskins…how did paying for FA work out for them again?)
Trading picks is going backwards.
Sooooo
You are saying that just because the Redskins fail at every FA approach that everyone who signs a FA fails? It is true that growing through the draft is the best way to build a team for the future. But FA’s are suppose to help as well. Not be the end all be all to solving problems. But when you have a team like this where just depth is the major issue and you have several key players at key positions, then you can afford to get a FA. Just just any name free agent but KEY free agents. Nicks and Grubbs are young, not retread and over the hill. We don’t have a HUGE problem with Lilja, but upgrading over him would be fine. Manning isn’t declining in play and hasnt shown that. He is just hurt is all. When he gets back and tests his arm there is no one on the planet who will second guess his ability to play. Soilia(spelling?) is young and capable. If we went for old and name players all the time then yes this would be a problem.
It is a long ways to trade up, and it will cost a lot.
I just don’t think it is realistic, as much as a wish it could be done.
The views expressed by craig in calgary do not necessarily represent the views of all Canadians.
I really don't get it...
The guy has ridden the coat tails of Bill Belichick long enough.. If next year we have a shit season and barely miss the playoffs because of sub par Cassel at the helm.. I say we petition for a new GM. There has to be a way to get a good personnel GM without blowing up our current team. It is time for Clark Hunt to grow a pair and tell Pioli to stop this insanity. We have almost all the pieces to be competing for a Super Bowl every year. We don’t even need a super elite QB like Manning or Brady. We just need a above average QB at the level of Roethlisberger. I really think Orton with a strong healthy team and this defense can make a deep run. We are so much better without all the three and outs.
Hunt
I really think he doesn’t know that much about football or its operations. He may understand the game, but judging talent and deciding how things are run I think he may not understand. Pioli is running the team as far as I’m concerned. And if he is just another GM/coach that cant get past the love they have for a certain player or players; then we have a problem Houston. Good GM’s and coaches move or cut or bench a player who isnt right or getting it done. Cassel had inflated numbers in 2010 because of the talent he had to use. But when push came to shove he couldn’t get it done.
Pioli is a lot of things
but if you know anything about him and the insanely intricate talent scouting formula they use (same one the Pats and Falcons use) I’d say he is a pretty decent evaluator of talent. Yes his best days were in NE so far, but I think we have done ok in the last few drafts finding value players in the right spots (see J. Houston 3rd round). He does need to show the fans he is as smart as he thinks though. He needs to start finding the Wes Welkers on the FA market and the Deion Branch’s, guys nobody would want but have tremendous upside.
no issues really with his drafting, but going after "guys nobody wants" is a poor way to build a team
you end up with a team full of “guys nobody wants” … and nobody wants them for (usually) a good reason
yes Breaston was a good add for us, not so much for Kelly Gregg … Lilja was ok for a year, this yeas not really good, Wiegs was a stopgap but this past year was not at all good (notice how the OLine play went down w/o Waters? yeah, me too!)
I’m a VERY strong advocate of building thru the draft … there are very few FA’s that are worth getting, the best and highest priced few yes, perhaps (Nicks, Soliai come to mind) but many are on the FA market because they aren’t worth what their agents think they’re worth (Finley, not a team player)
Pioli would be best served to listen to his draft people and continue to build thru the draft and develop (and KEEP) our own players … that’s how championship TEAMS are built, and maintained
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
All day
Pioli would be best served to listen to his draft people and continue to build thru the draft and develop (and KEEP) our own players … that’s how championship TEAMS are built, and maintained
He needs to stop
Hiring his staff on the number one principle that he worked with them prior. It is a great way to overlook top talent.
by KrazyChiefsfan on Feb 6, 2012 11:36 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Then again...
he reached for McCluster and Arenas… and T Jax…. all will contribute next year, but they were all taken too high for their value….
by AnkenyChiefsFan on Feb 6, 2012 3:09 PM CST up reply actions
Not Pioli
Im sorry if I didn’t make it clear in my statement. I was refering to Hunt not being capable of judging talent and and being unsure of how to run things.
cassel had weis to
will the chiefs ever draft a Qb in the first round, not since todd blackledge in 83. and the chiefs could of had marino. OH well atleast 65 toss power trap worked for KC, it should be wide open red. Hank stram still the man.
by niageriannit1 on Feb 6, 2012 8:14 PM CST up reply actions
Anger in this one, I sence
Fear, leads to hate
Hate leads to anger
Anger leads to the dark side…..
“Just win baby” Al Davis
says the one hoping for RG3 ;-)
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
Problem is, there has to be one available
This is where Pioli and Hunt must try to get us a legitimate QB
Exactly
and with only 2 available in the draft, we may have to wait one more year for the first round QB. I still think Barkley is the prize next year, but he may find himself at #1 by then.
Weeden in the 2nd?
Is he someone who looks ready to start from day one? I don’t know much about him, but heard he would definitely be a first rounder if not for his age.
Maybe we get 7-8 years of franchise QB in the 2nd :)
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I am the Master of Hyperenthetical Asiditry (you know, like this. Only more)
Foles perhaps?
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
They could try it
At least it’d be SOME effort.
Although I’m still of the opinion that if you’re going to go for a QB with anything more than “long shot” in mind, you should go all in and get the best you can.
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I am the Master of Hyperenthetical Asiditry (you know, like this. Only more)
I understand
I feel the same way about the Offensive Line :-)
it’s all good, my friend … in the end we both want the same thing
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
More than likely
He is a solid prospect, and i can see Pioli drafting him in the second and presenting the pick as if he is giving Cassel competition and we should be pleased. For this half assed attempt I know Pioli would do, I can’t support it.
I watched Foles in 3 or 4 games, or parts thereof.
He’s a big-armed Matty Nice. Inaccurate, locks onto his primary receiver, Juron Criner every play, or checks-down. Although, to be fair, Criner is the BEST WR in the Pac-10; Foles has a phantom OL, and about absolutely other receivers to choose from; so give the kid a break, I guess. Big physique (6’5-240ish) but a flat-footed, pure pocket passer that ran a pro-style O. Awareness sucks, Mr. Happy Feet, immobile, panic prone. But, yeah – the exact attributes Scotty P apparently looks for in his QB’s; see Matty Nice and Hippie Hatin’ Icky RIcky Stanzi scouting reports from 2010 and 2011, as well. (roles eyes and sighs)
A Dog's Heart
He is your friend, your partner, your defender, your dog. You are his life, his love, his leader. He will be yours, faithful and true, to the last beat of his heart. You owe it to him to be worthy of such devotion.
Author Unknown
by LocoLoboChico on Feb 7, 2012 5:34 PM CST up reply actions
I saw him beat my Hawkeyes
He is solid like I said. But I won’t support the pick if he was all we did to get QB competition for Cassel. Foles is just like Stanzi in that he will need time to be prepared and understand the game.
How about Osweiler?
Not a lot of experience, but a BIG guy, one that can see over the O-linemen…and fairly athletic, too…
by AnkenyChiefsFan on Feb 6, 2012 8:43 PM CST up reply actions
6-7th round
He is a late round to rookie free agent at best. He has skill and the size is intriguing, but his technique and understanding of the position needs work. He is a long term prospect.
I watched Osweiler about 5 games, or parts thereof too.
The guy would be totally overwhelmed by the NFL. He might make a back-up. But he’s just an athletic version of Drew Stanton.
A Dog's Heart
He is your friend, your partner, your defender, your dog. You are his life, his love, his leader. He will be yours, faithful and true, to the last beat of his heart. You owe it to him to be worthy of such devotion.
Author Unknown
by LocoLoboChico on Feb 7, 2012 5:37 PM CST up reply actions
If Weeden would be an Andy Dalton from Day 1 minimum ...
and go up from there, then GO FOR IT! The guy is calm, cool and collected in the pocket; this stuff can’t be learned, practiced to death, nor coached – you’re either BORN with that mentality or you’re not. See Tyler Wilson for toughness and remaining cool under pressure; he just needs to work on his footwork, throwing mechanics and decision making; he’s a bit of a gun slinger. Weedon also makes purty good decisions from what very little I watched of him. His AGE be damned if can get us 6-8 years of at least Trent Green play, or hopefully better.
So Scotty – trade back to the late first and grab Weedon at the back end of the 1st, or early second, and get another 2nd pick for OG/OT/TE. This is a purty deep OG class, Purty good OG’s will be there after the 2nd too – especially guys that would fit our ZBS, while the more numerous PBS teams grab the OG’s that fit their scheme; the same things does for ZBS OT’s. A HEALTHY Datko is still my fave if he’s there in the 2nd/3rd.
I’m sooo SICK of bullshit sub-par/mediocre “game manager” QB’s for our team; everytime I hear that “game manager” term, I want to puke! Play-making very good to elite QB’s also manage the damn game! “Game manager” is just a mass rationalization for a QB that SUCKS! End of my arrogant, no-nuthin diatribe! Have a nice day! :+)
A Dog's Heart
He is your friend, your partner, your defender, your dog. You are his life, his love, his leader. He will be yours, faithful and true, to the last beat of his heart. You owe it to him to be worthy of such devotion.
Author Unknown
by LocoLoboChico on Feb 7, 2012 5:23 PM CST up reply actions
No thanks to Weeden
He is NOT that good. He may have all those qualities, but I’ve seen enough that I agree with many of the draft experts when they say his size can be an issue, and his arm isn’t great. Better than most for sure, but not you draft in the first or second to be the QBOTF.
Not a fan
I’ve watched Barkely play and to be honest I don’t see it. I am not a fan of his and don’t think he is that good. He doesn’t have the fastest release and I see a few balls thrown a bit wobbly. Sure all QB’s throw a wobbler now and then, but I don’t like the amount of times and how much of a wobble in the ball. It’s just enough to be concerning.
You apparently watch didn't Matty B. the second half of last season.
But yeah, showing he’s improved his arm strength and velocity using getting his body into his throwing mechanics to get the most velocity out of his passes permanently will be his test next season. He has unlimited confidence, leadership and work ethic; great attitude; and reading D’s, going thru progressions, mobility, pocket presence and accuracy down; IOW’s, he’s already mastered the WCO that USC employs. And next year will be 4 years straight he’s been the starter from being a TRUE freshman. He’s NO Sanchez nor Leinart.
A Dog's Heart
He is your friend, your partner, your defender, your dog. You are his life, his love, his leader. He will be yours, faithful and true, to the last beat of his heart. You owe it to him to be worthy of such devotion.
Author Unknown
by LocoLoboChico on Feb 7, 2012 5:47 PM CST up reply actions
I still say no thanks
From what I’ve seen he reminds me of alot of QB’s that people fall for when I just don’t see it. Ive watched the QB’s that are successful and I see none of the qualities to inspire me to think he can come in and lead our team. Besides unless we tank on purpose next year we have no shot at him because he will go top 5 no matter how I think of him.
Every year there are draft picks that don't pan out. What's wrong with trading several,
one year, to get a QB with the potential to be elite? Get RGIII.
nothing is wrong with that approach ...
… unless the one you get also doesn’t pan out, then you’ve ruined the team for a long time to come, what you’ve been building carefully goes backwards instead of forward
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
The chiefs have done well in the last 5 but prior to that we had Ryan Sims, Larry Johnson, Niklas Sundstorm, Sylvester Morris. Thats four consecutive years of wasted 1st rounders
**Heres to 5 err 4 more years of JC!!!!**
alright, but as you've said ... we moved past King Carl's wasted picks and we're on the way up now ... so it appears
job is almost done, you want to stop rebuilding now? you want that super-fancy game room whatever analogy you want to use while the roof still leaks and the house still needs replacement windows? (sorry, that’s all I got at the moment)
I think we’re better off to continue replacing those old windows and fix the roof and maybe paint the house (Orton) and then see about that new game room … that fancy stuff will always be out there (Barkley) but if the roof leaks your toys are gonna get ruined, we’ll need new carpet and all your friends will hate you
and you don’t want that to happen, do you honey ;-)
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
I get it ups I just think we need to explore all possibilities
but all said and done we will probably go for beef in the trenches which we sorely need. I just hate to see us go another 20 years without a franchise qb
I like the metaphor...at least I think it's a metaphor
But that is also the same Kool-Aid we have been drinking since Carl took over. He would give up on that approach and then get the wrong vets because he thought it would make us happy. And then go back to this mantra again and again. We have the cap space and the talent already on the roster. We don’t have that many holes to fill to be a consistent competitive team. I don’t see any harm in pulling back a bit for a year or two in the draft when the key players are locked up for long term already.
Agreed
I am not saying throw away the draft or anything like that at all. I like the build through the draft idea and think the Chiefs have done well under Pioli. My thinking is that if (I know another if) the chiefs can be a player in FA and grab just 2 top notch FAs in Carl Nicks and Paul Soliai then I think moving up to grab RG3 would be well justified and well played. I dont think of a move like that as just RG3 I think of it as addressing 3 needs. Its a puzzle you put together and if 1 or two pieces fit the right way the third could go a long way towards solving this big picture.
**Heres to 5 err 4 more years of JC!!!!**
Larry Johnson?
I’ll admit the guy is not good now, but 5 years ago he led the league in rushing. After starting only 10 games or something like that, if I am not mistaken….
by AnkenyChiefsFan on Feb 6, 2012 3:11 PM CST up reply actions
I hardly think trading 2 #1 picks constitutes ruining the team for a long time to come....
that’s a pretty big overstatement.
You have to make a lot more than ONE bad draft decision to ruin the team for years to come.
Oakland has made an insurmountable number of idiotic draft choices, free agency moves, and trades… year after year after year… under Al Davis. They hit on the kickers, and Seymore (but even seymore wasn’t too bright because they didn’t sing the guy to a contract after that 1st rounder they gave away.. they COULD have lost him the next season).. but other than that.. it’s been 3-5 round reaches for players no one thought would go i the first.. and massive contracts to guys that are barely worth being a starters…
It wasn’t ONE pick (Jamarcus Russell) and one pick alone that set that team back as far as they have been. Even up to 2011 they were still making really bad decisions (Pryor for a draft pick, Palmer for 1 big picks after his play for the last few years, that contract for the worst starting safety in football, etc…) compiling their problems.
If you swap firsts, and give away another first next year…. and thats the big risk you take.. you’ve only really used 1 extra draft pick on your QB…6 more picks + Free Agency are left BOTH years to improve your team. You’re making it sound like it would set the team back 10 years to use 1 extra pick on a QB….. that’s not even remotely true. It’s an alarmists position.
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynicism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
BIG amen to all that.
I’d trade three 1st round picks for a SPECIAL QB. That’s only actually two extra firsts, and then you have 2nd thru 7th rounds for OL’men, TE’s, DB’s, WR’s, RB’s, LB’ers, and even DL’men. If you can’t build a GOOD, deep team to help that very good to elite QB get to the SB from the 2nd thru 7th round draft picks, plus FA’s, then you need to get better scouting dept. and GM!
I think teams get in trouble when they start throwing in 2nd, 3rd, 5th’s and such, plus a 1st rounder, for anybody. But of course, teams considering trading that 1st rd. pick want those later rd. picks to get another starter or two and depth.
A Dog's Heart
He is your friend, your partner, your defender, your dog. You are his life, his love, his leader. He will be yours, faithful and true, to the last beat of his heart. You owe it to him to be worthy of such devotion.
Author Unknown
by LocoLoboChico on Feb 7, 2012 5:58 PM CST up reply actions
BUT!
We are also in a good postition with current players and cap space standing that if that pick doesn’t pan out then we won’t be down for long. Not like it would be any different than we have been. SO whats the harm?
I agree with this
People shout that don’t trade up for him because he may bust! Why? They have just as much chance at not making it as the rest of the guys in the other rounds.
Great post
It is time very well put
by kcchiefs2782 on Feb 6, 2012 11:49 AM CST via Android app reply actions
max I would give up for RG3
our 1st, Dorsey and Bowe(tagged and traded). If thats not good enough then screw it and draft DeCastro and move on. At least test the waters though
Would the Rams want Dorsey?
I could see them wanting Bowe, but does Dorsey fit their scheme?
I like it, though…
by AnkenyChiefsFan on Feb 6, 2012 3:13 PM CST up reply actions
Yes, he does
He’d be more ideal there (supposedly) than he is here. And he IS a proven run stopper. Enough to make him attractive to a team that is starving for talent.
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I am the Master of Hyperenthetical Asiditry (you know, like this. Only more)
Great post, if everyone doesnt REC this they are just hating the fact they didnt say it.
we all know we are thinking this way. at this point i totally agree, thats why I like manning even though its just a small portion of our stud QB its easy to get him if you really want him, im all for giving up the picks for Luck or Griffen III, who cares use free agency and do what you got to do to check off a huge hole and please please please dont show cassell again on the field as our starter.
I booed him from day 1 and have never stopped booing him, MNchiefs fan you remember me from espn days booing cassell. your Jbrad right?
haha no
Remember Seth? That’s me :)
He DID write very similarly to me though…
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I am the Master of Hyperenthetical Asiditry (you know, like this. Only more)
jbrad, that is
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I am the Master of Hyperenthetical Asiditry (you know, like this. Only more)
I was a Cassel supporter
Until early this season. We all knew 2010 was an easy schedule, and we got lucky with minimal injuries. 2011 exposed Cassel for what he is. Just an average QB not much better than your average backup. When we got Cassel i was hesitant, but knew we had to get behind him because he would be here for at least 3 years. And in those 3 years I would like to win a super bowl. Well the 3 years are up and nothing. His up and down play alone is enough for me. I dont want to see he go lights out against a good team and then not show up against a bad team, and vice versa. It’s just not fair to the fan.

by 

























