A Look at the Case for RG3
Prepare for a decent read!!!! Not for the faint of heart. I did my best to add some pics and keep it thin. For the record, I just want a good quarterback in kc. I don't care who it is. I am convinced that Cassel is incapable of winning a Superbowl (neither is Orton, they're the same skill level just different styles). Just winning a playoff game is not going to cut it with the talent on this team. It could be Manning, Flynn, Robert Griffin III, Stanzi. Today, I present the case for RG3. I have looked at QB bust s from 1998-2008 of those picked in the top ten and why we should not factor their failures into RG3's chances. Also, read the link to look at all positions for top 10 pick busts, since we are basically picking there. I added a list of the draft positions of current Pro Bowlers so you all can see where the elite (except the Super Bowl players) come from. Finally, I examine likely trade possibilities with the Rams.
The list of quarterbacks and other positions drafted in the top ten 1998-2008
Matt Ryan, JaMarcus Russell, Vince Young, Matt Leinart, Alex Smith, Eli Manning, Philip Rivers, Carson Palmer, Byron Leftwich, David Carr, Joey Harrington, Michael Vick, Tim Couch, Donovan McNabb, Akili Smith
6 Hits. 9 busts. 6/15 = 40% success rate. Almost one out of two picks is a good QB.
By the way, busts or successes for quarterbacks after 2008 still aren't totally known yet (even Alex Smith can turn his image around).
Examining the causes of failure:
1. Russell - Horrible work ethic (most likely due to his affinity for skittles)
via www.obsessedwithsports.com
2. Vince Young - Promising until immaturity and mental problems ended his run (And he already was on a dream team before the Eagles. The Bust Dream Team baby.)
3. Matt Lineart - Also labeled as immature/lazy. Lost qb battles to Warner and Derek Who?
4. Alex Smith - Thought of as a pure bust until this year. Now is just a mediocre quarterback. The ending of the Saints - Niners game gives him a promising future. Bust for now
5. Byron Leftwich - Promising start until ankle injuries
6. David Carr - David Carr Syndrome is now an official medical condition. Symptoms include a horrible offensive line, a terrible running game, and being sacked 76 times in one season...wow
7. Joey Harrington - No real reason to point out his failure besides not much of a leader. Just flat out busted. Sing us a song you're a piano man now.
8. Tim Couch - Some promise but injuries
9. Akili Smith - One season of success in college. Held out during rookie training camp. Couldn't understand offense.
Analysis: One had really no explanation for their bust other than being bad. One was overhyped after one good season in college (kinda sounds like Mark Sanchez huh?) and low football IQ. One has been labeled a bust but signs point to him turning it around. Three were linked to on the field problems such as a poor offensive line or injuries. Three lacked the mental qualities with immaturity/laziness/depression
Where RG3 differs: Robert Griffin III (or Really Good X 3) has great potential. Courtesy of walterfootball.com
via www.pageblip.com
Strengths:
Great arm strength
Quick release
Accurate thrower
Smart; protects the football
Good field vision
Extremely mobile with scrambling ability
Very intelligent
Proven leader; passion for the game
Winner at collegiate level
Experienced 3-year starter
Clutch performer who plays at his best in crunch time
Good teammate without an ego
Plays with swagger
Opens up mismatches for teammates with dual-threat nature
High-character individual
Weaknesses:
Height is a touch short
Could use some more bulk to handle hitting
Rarely played against a top defense
Did not play in a pro-stye offense
Rarely took snaps from under center
Summary: Griffin was the most dangerous playmaker in college football in 2011. He did the most with the least and led his team to wins against programs the school could never compete with in past years. Despite a horrible defense and suspect offensive line, Griffin lit up scoreboards on a weekly basis. Griffin completed 72 percent of his passes for 4,293 yards with 37 touchdowns and six interceptions in 2011. He has also rushed for 699 yards and 10 touchdowns. Griffin won the Heisman Trophy for his dominant season.
Over his collegiate years, Griffin has been a consistent performer who has shown steady improvement. In 2008, Griffin started playing as a freshman. He completed 59 percent of his passes for 2,091 yards with 15 touchdowns and three interceptions. That season he ran for 1,118 yards and 13 touchdowns. He lost almost all of the 2009 season to injury. The year after, he had a completion percentage of 67 percent for 3,501 yards and 22 touchdowns with eight interceptions. He ran for 808 yards and eight scores.
Griffin has a strong arm, and his accuracy on throws deep downfield is truly remarkable. To all levels of the field, Griffin is extremely accurate throwing the ball. He can fire ropes on deep outs, all while making good decisions in the process.
Griffin is a fantastic athlete with speed to burn. He is a track competitor; when he breaks into the open field, he rips off yards in an instant. This season, Griffin also showed the grit to take some big hits and stay in the game.
Griffin is also a high-character individual who is very intelligent. He has the makings of a franchise quarterback on and off the field. Griffin has the toughness to be successful, but will have to be developed some at the NFL level, and learn how to operate a pro style offense. There isn't a competitor with Griffin to be the second quarterback behind Andrew Luck.
Player Comparison: Steve McNair. Griffin's foot speed and running ability is similar to Eagles' quarterback Michael Vick, but Griffin is a much better passer than Vick, and that makes the comparison closer to McNair. Over a long NFL career, McNair was an accurate pocket passer who could make big plays with feet. Griffin has the same skill set where he can sit in the pocket and beat teams with his arm, or he can take off and make a splash play on the ground. Like McNair, Griffin is 6-foot-2 and has enough height to play the position. McNair was taken with the third-overall pick and Griffin is likely to go in the top five of the 2012 NFL Draft.
Projecting Griffin to the pros, however, I see a player with the ability to be a player like McNair. -end walterfootball
Alright. Let's compare to the busts.
Is he immature/lazy? No.
Is he a one year wonder? No.
Is he injury prone? Possibly but leaning towards no. Had one year of injury.
Will he get injured? TBA.
Can he adapt to the NFL after playing in the spread? Alex Smith seems to have done so. I can't seem to remember any others though. Oh wait I heard that one rookie in Carolina did pretty good this year...wait didn't he set a rookie passing record?
Since RG3 lacks immaturity and is an established college quarterback, let's eliminate 4 from the 9 in our percentages due to different makeup.
6/11= 55%
Now let's eliminate David Carr because the Chief's o-line and running game isn't epic in a bad way. 6/10 = 60%
Then if Alex Smith continues his momentum.....7/10=70%
So it stands at 60% with the injury risks. Now let's say that RG3 does not have multiple year ending injuries and eliminate the qbs that failed due to injury. That improves his chance of success to 9/10 = 90%. That means his chance of success has a floor of 60% currently and a ceiling of 90% based on history.
O-line is the safest position in the draft in the top ten according to the above article:
1. WR - 17/12 - 70% BR
2. QB - 15/9 - 60% BR
3. DE - 11/6 - 54% BR
4. TE - 2/1 - 50% BR
5. DT - 10/4 - 40% BR
6. RB - 11/4 - 36% BR
7-T. LB - 9/3 - 33% BR
7-T. CB - 9/3 - 33% BR
8. S - 5/1 - 20% BR
9. OL - 11/1 - 9% BR
|
Bust factors for first round draft picks by position, 1998-2007
|
|||||||||||
|
Position
|
1st Rd
|
Top 10
|
Busts
|
Bust %
|
|||||||
|
Quarterbacks
|
28
|
16
|
13
|
46%
|
|||||||
|
Running Backs
|
30
|
12
|
9
|
30%
|
|||||||
|
Wide Receivers
|
43
|
17
|
20
|
47%
|
|||||||
|
Tight Ends
|
13
|
2
|
1
|
8%
|
|||||||
|
Total O-Line
|
41
|
11
|
3
|
7%
|
|||||||
|
Centers
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
0%
|
|||||||
|
Guards
|
9
|
0
|
1
|
11%
|
|||||||
|
Tackles
|
28
|
11
|
2
|
7%
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL OFFENSE
|
155
|
58
|
46
|
31%
|
|||||||
That table comes from this link. It's a good read on all 1st round draft bust rates.
And for you supporters of trade down that will tell you how we will fare by position (I'm guessing some of you are screaming o-line right about now).
In theory, if you believe that RG3 will not be injured multiple times, his chance of success is slightly lower than that of a Mr. Jonathon Martin or a Mr. Riley Reiff or a Mr. David Decastro. If you factor in multiple injuries, its 20 - 30 % lower.
Now look at the list below. This is the case for not drafting a OL with our first pick. 4/6 pro bowl guards were drafted round 3 or later (<3 Brian Waters). Why go with a guard with our first pick if we have a good chance of finding one in a later round or in free agency. Now, for tackle, all those tackles are LT. We would be most likely drafting a RT. From looking around the web. I saw Albert allowed 5 sacks this year (less than Joe Thomas). This article says he's ranked 12th for LTs . With better lineman, a respected running game, and a quick RG3 around him, expect those numbers to improve.
I wouldn't mind this guy as our LG. He's only 26
|
Position
|
Team
|
Name
|
Drafted
|
Round
|
Pick
|
|
QB
|
|
|
2000
|
6
|
33
|
|
|
|
2004
|
1
|
11
|
|
|
|
Philip Rivers
|
2004
|
1
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
1
|
24
|
|
|
Saints
|
|
2001
|
2
|
1
|
|
|
Giantss
|
Eli Manning
|
2004
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
RB
|
|
|
2008
|
2
|
24
|
|
|
|
2006
|
2
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagles
|
|
2009
|
2
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
2
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
3
|
1
|
|
|
WR
|
Patriots
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steelers
|
|
2009
|
3
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
1
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
4
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
1
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
1
|
3
|
|
|
|
Steve Smith
|
2001
|
3
|
12
|
|
|
Packers
|
|
2006
|
2
|
20
|
|
|
TE
|
Patriots
|
|
2010
|
2
|
10
|
|
Chargers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saints
|
|
2010
|
3
|
31
|
|
|
|
Tony Gonzalez
|
1997
|
1
|
13
|
|
|
T
|
|
Joe Thomas
|
2007
|
1
|
3
|
|
|
|
2008
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
1
|
4
|
|
|
Eagles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49ers
|
|
2007
|
1
|
28
|
|
|
Saints
|
|
2007
|
4
|
26
|
|
|
G
|
Patriots
|
|
2005
|
1
|
32
|
|
Patriots
|
Brian Waters
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ravens
|
Marshall Yanda
|
2007
|
3
|
23
|
|
|
Saints
|
|
2006
|
4
|
11
|
|
|
Saints
|
|
2008
|
5
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
1
|
23
|
|
|
C
|
Steelers
|
|
2010
|
1
|
18
|
|
Jets
|
|
2006
|
1
|
29
|
|
|
Panthers
|
|
2007
|
2
|
27
|
|
|
Packers
|
|
2004
|
7
|
50
|
|
from drafthistory.com
Alright, now for the main argument against RG3: the cost of trading up to the second pick in the draft.
Let's start with the draft a QB next year argument. I'll go with the guys I see consistently in the top 5 rankings for now.
Matt Barkley - should be a top 3 pick as long as one of the top 3 need a QB (stats from espn)
|
SEASON
|
CMP
|
ATT
|
YDS
|
CMP%
|
YPA
|
LNG
|
TD
|
INT
|
SACK
|
RAT
|
|
2011
|
308
|
446
|
3528
|
69.1
|
7.91
|
82
|
39
|
7
|
8
|
161.2
|
|
2010
|
236
|
377
|
2791
|
62.6
|
7.40
|
61
|
26
|
12
|
16
|
141.2
|
|
2009
|
211
|
352
|
2735
|
59.9
|
7.77
|
75
|
15
|
14
|
17
|
131.3
|
Landry Jones - most likely top 10
|
SEASON
|
CMP
|
ATT
|
YDS
|
CMP%
|
YPA
|
LNG
|
TD
|
INT
|
SACK
|
RAT
|
|
2011
|
355
|
562
|
4463
|
63.2
|
7.94
|
64
|
29
|
15
|
10
|
141.6
|
|
2010
|
405
|
617
|
4718
|
65.6
|
7.65
|
86
|
38
|
12
|
19
|
146.3
|
|
2009
|
261
|
449
|
3198
|
58.1
|
7.12
|
67
|
26
|
14
|
Aaron Murray - Most likely top 15
|
SEASON
|
CMP
|
ATT
|
YDS
|
CMP%
|
YPA
|
LNG
|
TD
|
INT
|
SACK
|
RAT
|
|
2011
|
238
|
403
|
3149
|
59.1
|
7.81
|
80
|
35
|
14
|
32
|
146.4
|
|
2010
|
209
|
342
|
3049
|
61.1
|
8.92
|
66
|
24
|
8
|
24
|
154.5
|
Tyler Bray - depending on senior year. Sometime in the first round
|
SEASON
|
CMP
|
ATT
|
YDS
|
CMP%
|
YPA
|
LNG
|
TD
|
INT
|
SACK
|
RAT
|
|
2011
|
147
|
247
|
1983
|
59.5
|
8.03
|
81
|
17
|
6
|
11
|
144.8
|
|
2010
|
125
|
224
|
1849
|
55.8
|
8.25
|
80
|
18
|
10
|
16
|
142.7
|
Tyler Wilson - depending heavily on senior year performance. Considered to have the highest ceiling. Can go top 10
|
SEASON
|
CMP
|
ATT
|
YDS
|
CMP%
|
YPA
|
LNG
|
TD
|
INT
|
SACK
|
RAT
|
|
2011
|
277
|
438
|
3638
|
63.2
|
8.31
|
68
|
24
|
6
|
26
|
148.4
|
|
2010
|
34
|
51
|
453
|
66.7
|
8.88
|
54
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
155.4
|
|
2009
|
22
|
36
|
218
|
61.1
|
6.06
|
21
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
119.2
|
|
2008
|
11
|
22
|
69
|
50.0
|
3.14
|
10
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
73.2
|
RG3(for comparison)
|
SEASON
|
CMP
|
ATT
|
YDS
|
CMP%
|
YPA
|
LNG
|
TD
|
INT
|
SACK
|
RAT
|
|
2011
|
291
|
402
|
4293
|
72.4
|
10.68
|
87
|
37
|
6
|
27
|
189.5
|
|
2010
|
304
|
454
|
3501
|
67.0
|
7.71
|
94
|
22
|
8
|
20
|
144.2
|
|
2009
|
45
|
69
|
481
|
65.2
|
6.97
|
42
|
4
|
0
|
4
|
142.9
|
|
2008
|
160
|
267
|
2091
|
59.9
|
7.83
|
61
|
15
|
3
|
28
|
142.0
|
The only quarterback I wouldn't touch is Bray, due to lack of experience (hasn't carried a full load yet). Barkley and Jones will be first round picks barring a major setback. Murray will be if he declares, but lately we've seen qbs stay in college an extra year to get more money or whatever they say that they want (Locker, Barkley, Jones). With Barkley and Jones ahead of him and the possibility of Wilson passing ahead of Murray, I can see him going back (Bray might do the same). With only 3 legit 1st round talents guaranteed to be in the draft next year, we now have to consider where the Chiefs will draft. The chiefs went 7-9 this year with 3 key starters injured the whole or almost the whole season. Not to mention enduring the inept Tyler Palko for 4 games (still don't understand why you don't throw Stanzi out there and see what he can do). Also, with the new draft picks not named RG3, we can very easily go 8-8 or better. We would be picking at 15 or higher in next year's draft. Do you honestly think 3 (maybe 4) franchise signal callers are going to make it that far? Let's look at teams who could be needing a qb next year.
1. Rams- new regimes usually mean new qbs. Fisher did not draft Bradford. If Bradford has another poor year due to performance or injury, Fisher could look elsewhere
2. Cleveland - if they don't draft RG3
3. Jacksonville - whether or not you can blame Gabbert for the poor year, if he doesn't improve next year the Jags will be looking for another option
4. Tamba Bay - if Freeman has another problematic year in his 4th year, don't be suprised
5. Washington - unless RG3, Manning
6. Miami - Matt Moore could develop into a franchise qb. Maybe Manning or RG3
7. Buffalo - Fitz is 29. Struggled down the stretch. Even with his contract, they could develop one under him
8. Arizona - Kolb is having trouble staying on the field. He's not doing that great either
9. NY Jets - With a teammate bashing Sanchez this offseason, the Ryan talk about taking Manning in a draft over Sanchez, and a poor season by Sanchez, it's likely
10. Denver - As long as Tebow wins, his stats won't matter with the revenue he generates and his positive image. But.....how long before the Tebow train runs out of fuel?
If any of these teams are drafting high next year, it's most likely due to their quarterbacks. You can most likely eliminate 3 of these teams because of Flynn/Manning/RG3 pickups. That still leaves 7 teams.
Finally, let's examine the cost of the second overall pick. I'm throwing out the trade value chart because no one actually follows that. There are going to be teams bidding for the pick.
Browns - Cleveland has the best chance to win the bid. 2 first round picks. And the Rams would be able to get Kalil or Blackmon.
Redskins - at pick 6, they can package picks from this year and next year
Miami - at pick 9, same options as the Redskins
Chiefs- at pick 11/12, same options as before. If they are forced to franchise Bowe/Carr, they could use the one they franchise as trade bait with draft picks.
Honestly, I don't see the Chiefs pulling the trigger. Pioli seems to have too much faith in Cassel, and he loves his extra draft picks.
But....if he does, he would realistically (at the minimum) trade a couple of 1st rounders and a couple of thirds if the other teams are pushing to trade up. He would resign Bowe and Carr long term, sign Nicks long term, draft a RT in the second round (Zebrie Sanders?), and draft a RB in later rounds. We would have a good to great young o-line with a solid ground attack and good to great WR (maybe Baldwin makes a big jump with the offseason). That puts RG3 in a prime position for success, leaning his chance of success toward the 90% range.
If this happens, expect Daboll to do this on draft day!
I'll finish by saying that this team has a window to win a Super Bowl with some of the current studs (DJ, Hali). Rookie QBs rarely come in and dominate in their first year (unless you're a super freak...I'm talking about you Cam Newton). The longer we wait to draft/pickup a franchise qb, the less of a window we have.
We should not by any means just go for a couple of playoff wins. True competitors want the main prize.If you have ever participated in a sport, playing it safe won't get you anywhere. You have to risk something at some point. Robert Griffin is a risk. But, he is a good risk. If we surround him(or some other young stud) with a good offense, he'll flourish.
Once you agree upon the price you and your family must pay for success, it enables you to ignore the minor hurts, the opponent's pressure, and the temporary failures.
Vince Lombardi
We are close. Hopefully, Pioli will prove that he is genius that he was thought to be when we first hired him. Go Chiefs.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.
98 comments
|
14 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
lots n lots n lots of great work, thank you!!!
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
Alot of good information here. Not that I agree with it all but well executed post.
I don’t like turning picks into math or science that usually doesn’t work out. I’m not a big fan of moving up this year especially because of the cost to do so. Griffin isn’t the player I would move up for for sure because he is the poster child of boom or bust player and in my opinion it’s leaning more on the bust side of things. You can’t really compare him to anyone in the league(especially newton) and I’m just not convinced that what he did in college ball will translate to the NFL.
I’d much rather go get a QB in the draft next year where there could be 3-4 guys picked in the first 5 picks. The difference is because there’s more options the cost should be less to move up, as well there will likely be less teams in dire need of a QB next year because some of them will take care of it this season.
In the end, great write up and great work and rec for that.
"Give them nothing! But take from them everything!"
Disagree
Cam Newton has one year of NFL experience where he was OROTY and RGIII has zero years experience.
"Give them nothing! But take from them everything!"
by GenericBrand on Feb 6, 2012 11:21 AM CST up reply actions
I’m just not convinced that what he did in college ball will translate to the NFL.
LIke throwing with accuracy, being intelligent, having the best deep ball of any QB in college (including Golden Boy Luck), moving around the pocket well, and being more athletic than any QB currently in the league besides maybe Cam?
I feel those things will translate well :).
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I am the Master of Hyperenthetical Asiditry (you know, like this. Only more)
Super write-up. Completely agree. If Chief's have a half way decent year, they'll
probably be drafting closer to 20th and there’s not a Griffin coming up next year, so waiting until next year just does not make sense.
If the Chiefs have a half way decent year, why would we need to draft a QB?
Add to it that next years draft is deeper in QB talent, we shouldn’t need a ‘top’ pick to get a talented QB.
Cause even if Charles goes off for 300 yards a game.. there is still a hole at QB?
Charles gets shut down/hurt.. and we are screwed.
Next years draft LOOKS deeper, however not all will come out, not all will still be playing at a high level. It happens every year. Yes you need a top pick to get a talented QB prospect.
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Alameda Ta’amu NT/DE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 6, 2012 6:06 AM CST up reply actions
There's no Griffin next year
But there’s better, prototypical QBs in next years draft with much less bust factor.
"Give them nothing! But take from them everything!"
by GenericBrand on Feb 6, 2012 11:22 AM CST up reply actions
Me too
He has more physical tools than any QB in the league not named Mike Vick or Cam Newton, and is a smart, high character individual.
The combination is rare. ANY other year and he’d be the one people would refer to as a “once in a generation” prospect.
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I am the Master of Hyperenthetical Asiditry (you know, like this. Only more)
so
if any other year, he’d be referred to as a ‘once in a generation’ prospect, does that mean any other year he’d be overhyped?
Seems like that is a prime example….
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 7, 2012 8:39 AM CST up reply actions
Great work. Very in-depth.
Can we maybe pretty-please get this on the page? more people need to see this.
Bleedin Red & Gold... and Purple... since 1992.
by chiefs_fan_forever on Feb 5, 2012 8:14 PM CST reply actions
I would love Griffin,
I just don’t see how we could move up to get him though.
by KrazyChiefsfan on Feb 5, 2012 8:27 PM CST via mobile reply actions
It definitely depends on who all is vying for him
If CLE is desperate to get him, I don’t think we can compete with their ability to offer two first rounders (one of which is only a few picks after STL’s).
However, given the assets we do have (I see Dorsey as a tradeable commodity to a 4-3 team, fo example), I believe we could have a shot against anyone else.
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I am the Master of Hyperenthetical Asiditry (you know, like this. Only more)
Great Post
Needs to be printed off, and sent to Pioli immediately!
GIVE JAMAAL THE DAMN BALL!!!!!
by chief913-816 on Feb 5, 2012 8:55 PM CST via mobile reply actions
I'm sure Pioli can afford to have the interwebz
No need to print
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Alameda Ta’amu NT/DE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 5, 2012 9:26 PM CST up reply actions
he'd need his draft guys to translate it to him, though ;-)
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
that would go swiftly to the Permanent Circular File
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
Hmm AP was talking about Berry for a long time
So ya know we DID make that decision Just gotta keep talking about RGIII!
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Alameda Ta’amu NT/DE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 6, 2012 3:32 PM CST up reply actions
Good call
Is SwimCoach pushing for him? Because that’ll do it
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I am the Master of Hyperenthetical Asiditry (you know, like this. Only more)
Great post
I think we need to take the risk its been too long I think he is actually better then luck and will have a better career IMO but back to the risk It’s not as much as it used to be I don’t think it will set us back too much because we have so much young talent to work with now add a few more parts with the draft picks we have left maybe a OL and RB and some others idk what depth we can get with what picks we will have left but I think the risk is going to be well worth it!
by kcchiefs2782 on Feb 5, 2012 9:43 PM CST via Android app reply actions
Like the post...
But it wont happen. I can’t see it.
When you fail to prepare, you prepare to fail.
Jamaal above all. #25 ftw.
CHIEFS WILL!
I don't see it happening
But I do believe Griffin is a phenomenal prospect.
All the information provided destroys the argument that Griffin is a one year wonder or the product of his “system” or a “running QB.”
He has everything you look for in a franchise QB, and any other year would be an absolute lock for the number 1 pick.
I’d be thrilled if they made an aggressive move and picked him up. Yes, it’d be costly, but with a true franchise QB you suddenly have years to build a contender.
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I am the Master of Hyperenthetical Asiditry (you know, like this. Only more)
Too many other teams ahead of us also looking for a QB
Price may be too high, might have to mortgage the future of the team just to move up to the #2nd pick.
That alone would cancel that option for RG3 out.
"Qui audet adipiscitur!"
by aPacificChief on Feb 6, 2012 5:52 AM CST up reply actions
Honestly I don't agree with the whole "mortgage our future" argument
We’ve got a young team full of guys we can lock up, plenty of cap space to strengthen our weaknesses in FA, and a greater need for depth at most positions than starter talent.
Say we give up our first and 2nd rounder this year, Glenn Dorsey, and our first rounder next year. Is that really mortgaging our future?
People VASTLY overvalue draft picks. Not having a first round pick for one year isn’t going to kill us, nor will spending most of one draft on RG3.
If he pans out to be even 75% of what he’s projected to be, he’s worth several first round picks.
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I am the Master of Hyperenthetical Asiditry (you know, like this. Only more)
AND, we don't have a future, except mediocracy, unless we get a good QB.
by jcox31mc on Feb 6, 2012 10:23 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Well, yeah, there's that too :)
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I am the Master of Hyperenthetical Asiditry (you know, like this. Only more)
you tell me :-)
Say we give upour first and 2nd rounder this yearBaldwin, Hudson, Glenn Dorsey, andour first rounder next yearBerry. Is that really mortgaging our future?
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
Yes, but we do have those guys now and in some cases we could be giving up "busts."
If we still had mostly blank spots to fill, I would agree with you, but we don’t.
just saying that those are the kinds of players we DON'T get by trading up to get one RG3
there’s that “opportunity cost” that people all too often overlook
yes, we do have them NOW … but if we had traded those picks (in the past) to get some higher pick then we WOULDN’T have them at all … and that’s part of what needs to be taken into account
Center, WR, FS for years to come … what could we get right now for those picks people are willing to give up? what other needs does the team have that might not be addressed (certainly not with the best young talent available) if we give up those picks?
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
I think that we agree that something needs to be done about the QB.
It’s a matter of when and how. I like the pick too but just consider, we’ve even talked about the possibility of losing Bowe and to me that would be most likely because of the QB situation. I think and hope we do keep Bowe but we can still lose players because of our QB. These guys want to win and they know more about than we do but if they get discouraged about the QB situation it will hurt all around.
In addition, not losing draft picks is a big plus in considering Manning, Flynn
and even Orton. I’m really for any thing that at least partially resolves the QB problem.
Is that Steve Young or Vince?
"Qui audet adipiscitur!"
by aPacificChief on Feb 6, 2012 11:30 PM CST up reply actions
huh
but we could also be getting a bust.
can’t have it both ways. You can’t say any other pick but RG III and what would be traded for him could be a bust, without considering he could be a bust too, even if it seems highly unlikely. After all, the teams that picked qbs who turned out to be busts didn’t think they would be.
redo the math:
Say we give upour first and 2nd rounder this yearBaldwin, Hudson, Glenn Dorsey, andour first rounder next yearBerry, for JaMarcus Russell / Rex Grossman/ Alex Smith/ Danny Wuerffel/ Tim Couch Is that really mortgaging our future?
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 7, 2012 8:50 AM CST up reply actions
If we got a franchise QB? No
You named one player that’s shown flashes, another that’s shown potential, one that’s average, and one really good player.
Not exactly irreplaceable by any means, except Berry. And QB >>>>>>>> SS
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I am the Master of Hyperenthetical Asiditry (you know, like this. Only more)
sorry I didn't choose more carefully ... should I have used other 1st rounders instead? DJ comes to mind :-)
let’s face it, they’re all “potential” until proven otherwise (and that includes RG3) … bottom line is there’s definite opportunity cost associated with the idea of trading up
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
Opportunity cost damages business judgments far more than it helps IMO
It’s so theoretical, yet people treat it as though it is a fact-based mode of thinking.
The most important position in football is QB. There are a finite number of great QBs or even good QBs.
So tt is the most difficult position to obtain, AND it has more of an impact than any other position.
Think of it this way… who are our two best players? Say, DJ and Tamba?
Now, would you trade them for Aaron Rodgers? I would. In a heartbeat.
The same line of thinking applies to draft picks. All are unproven, and all carry risk. Yet, given the importance of QB and the level of difficulty in getting a franchise QB, it becomes worth the cost of other draft picks (obviously to a reasonable limit).
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I am the Master of Hyperenthetical Asiditry (you know, like this. Only more)
wow, I disagree that opportunity cost is "theoretical"
it’s absolutely not … it’s real and and it’s overlooked too often, risk taking is fine IF you’re in a position that taking said risk isn’t more harmful than if the risk itself fails (hmmmm, should I bet this year’s rent money on an inside straight, or should I continue to pay the mortgage? hmmmm!)
theoretical? MN, you know better than that!
to think otherwise is beyond foolish … it’s fine to bet a million on a roll of the dice if you have another million or two to back it up, but never gamble more than what you can afford to lose
so, you’d trade DJ and Tamba for Rodgers, awesome! would you trade them for RG3? and maybe toss in Houston while you’re at it? remember, if the new guy doesn’t pan out you’ve gone from a realy good to great defense to a mediocre at best defense … no risk? only a theory? you sure about that?
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
by upamtn on Feb 6, 2012 2:22 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
ups, would you blame Bowe if he left? Especially if he wanted to play
with a better QB? Even if money wasn’t his #1 beef? He’s one of my favorite players and I’d really hate to see him go, but I really couldn’t blame him.
My concern, is that there might be several players that are really frustrated about the potential of this team, just because of the QB play. Maybe it will get fixed, but obviously, it REALLY bothers a lot of us.
I think the players
have more faith in Cassel than the fan base, in general.
Fire Scott Pioli + hire Captain Hindsight = Superbowl.
by JayhawksNChiefs on Feb 6, 2012 2:48 PM CST up reply actions
prolly true
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
They get paid regardless
and the only ones that count right now are the ones with the ability to leave KC or come to KC
well, he could very well leave quickly and then find out that the Chiefs did indeed upgrade the QB position
so then what? I mean yeah, I hope we DO keep him and Carr … playing with a better QB, I hope that’s not his MAIN motivation, because a really good WR can help make a good QB even better … great players help make great players
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
What should his main motivations be? Money? Wanting to win?
Setting records? In any case, he needs a QB that can CONSISTANTLY get him the ball, hopefully in stride so that he can make a lot of yards after catch. We can hope.
I believe we're defining opportunity cost differently
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I am the Master of Hyperenthetical Asiditry (you know, like this. Only more)
how many teams have said that before?
RGIII__________ is not gonna be a bad bet
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 7, 2012 9:04 AM CST up reply actions
how many had the makeup of RGIII?
For every flat out bust due to poor development, there is a great success.
Ryan Leaf – Peyton Manning
Joey Harrington -Eli Mannning
RGIII’s one flaw is that he’s a spread-option QB, which guys like Cam Newton and Alex Smith are showing can adapt given the right coaching.
Recent busts are more due to character and intelligence makeup. Any QB taken in the top 10 has the physical potential to perform in the NFL. It’s the mental and intangible makeup that matters
Recent busts are more due to character and intelligence makeup. Any QB taken in the top 10 has the physical potential to perform in the NFL. It’s the mental and intangible makeup that matters
I’d argue team talent has a lot to do with that.
Anyway, who is the last spread qb to win a SB?
how many had the makeup of RGIII?
you’re missing the point. How many of those teams that ended up drafting busts THOUGHT he had that kind of makeup or a similar makeup?
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 8, 2012 6:44 PM CST up reply actions
and the chiefs have a lot of talent....
RG3 would be stepping into a good situation, especially if we signed a LG/RG and drafted a RT. Talented defense. Talented running game.
Touche on the SB one. My best argument against that is that 4 qbs in the playoffs were from spread offenses in college and 2/4 qbs in the conference championships were from spread offenses in college. And it wasn’t the qb’s fault in those games. The ravens were a dropped pass from a sb. The 49ers were robbed by their own ST.
And a rookie spread QB set an nfl rookie record and passed for over 4,000 yds(and i know you can’t compare them toe to toe but its not like rg3 is slow and unathletic with a weak arm)
And about makeup concerns. Vince Young scored a 7 and 16 on his two wonderlics.
Jamarcus Russel had work ethic and motivation concerns out of college.(such as holding out training camp for money like Akili Smith).
Google RGIII character concerns. The only articles I find are that he doesn’t have any.
How many QBs drafted in the 1st round that were stated to have no character concerns in the past busted because of character concerns? I may be wrong on that one but I can’t think of any.
The one thing I love most about RG3 is his desire to be the best. The “I could be wrong, but I think Baylor won its first Heisman tonight” quote was awesome.
And this one “I hate to talk about myself like that, but if I had to straight up tell a head coach or an owner why they should take me, it’s because I’m the best in everything I’ve done,” Griffin said. "I’m the most accurate. I have the strongest arm. I may not be the tallest. I may not be the heaviest. But I’m the best quarterback in the nation, and if they pass on me, then I understand. But I’m going to go out and be the best quarterback for somebody else.
Do you question his work ethic after his body of work and statements such as these?
The only thing I question with RG III is the same thing I question with all incoming rookies
will they succeed? And as much as I am a fan of what RG III did in college, we just can’t answer that right now.
Doesn’t mean I’m dead set against him. I’m not. If it happens, cool. If not, as long as an actual upgrade is made at QB, cool.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 9, 2012 9:23 PM CST up reply actions
definitely with you there
if they don’t do anything i hope cassel proves me wrong
so, you’d trade DJ and Tamba for Rodgers, awesome! would you trade them for RG3? and maybe toss in Houston while you’re at it?
I used proven players vs. proven players to show the value of QB.
With RG3, it’d be unproven players vs. unproven players
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I am the Master of Hyperenthetical Asiditry (you know, like this. Only more)
there ya go
With RG3, it’d be unproven players vs. unproven players
I think you miswrote that. should read:
With RG3, it’d be AN unproven playersvs. unproven playerS
When all are unproven, its hard to argue quality….
So that just leaves quantity. Its at least 3 to 1. That’s the starting point….until the Dan Snyders of the world come in.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 7, 2012 9:09 AM CST up reply actions
rec'd.
i like RG III as much as the next guy. okay, maybe not. I like him, but I haven’t went to that crazy viagra popping level half of AP has.
Mainly because of the cost. And because I don’t like building up an idea just to be let down. Sure, none of us knows Pioli and what/how he truly thinks. But I think most would agree that this doesn’t look like his type of move. He values draft picks. He prides himself on finding steals. And he pops his viagra for the hard-working Matt Cassel types.
He brought Cassel over, drafted Stanzi, and allowed Tyler Palko to remain in KC for more than one year. (Note: I just puked in my mouth a little bit at that last half a sentence).
I don’t like Cassel. Dislike Palko even more. Orton looked way better. And I’m looking forward to see what Stanzi can do. I’d like to trust Pioli to do the right thing. The closest he has been to doing the right thing is getting rid of Croyle and Thigpen, drafting Stanzi, and picking up Orton on waivers—though i’m starting to wonder if that last move is because he knew he was going to fire Haley, and he wanted to give Romeo a decent qb with NFL experience.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 7, 2012 9:02 AM CST up reply actions
It's always funny when people point to Pioli's draft history in NE and expect it to continue here
Does he have a QB here? Nope. Is he at the bottom of the first? Nope. So yeah I mean its so similar guess we can continue to look at his drafts with Brady and expect the same with Cassel.
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Alameda Ta’amu NT/DE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 7, 2012 10:08 AM CST up reply actions
he has a draft history now, here as well
but I never said he wouldn’t do anything. I just said that most would agree that this doesn’t look like his type of move—what our collective experience tells us from what we’ve seen from his body of work.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 7, 2012 5:30 PM CST up reply actions
if he turns out to be a franchise qb hell yes
but we don’t know if he will be, and we don’t know if the picks we would give up are going to be boomers or busts. Either you want the status quo @qb or you gamble. I’m undecided really
To get ahead in this world, you have to take risks. Was Cam Newton a risk?
Was Eli? Was Brees after his injury? Are Luck and RGIII? Heck yes but they seem to have all of the attributes that are needed for a very good – great franchise QB.
tomachop, one can make changes and not go with the status quo w/o trading up
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
agreed ups
today I’m just in a pondering mood, with all the bantor in DC about Manning, and Miami looking @ Flynn it might be worth considering what it might take to get an RG3, we can always say no and get DeCastro or Martin or Reiff
Does this mean were not thinking of a Offensive tackle like in the Mock(ing the Chiefs) Drafts?
"Qui audet adipiscitur!"
I would go DeCastro before Martin/Reiff
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Alameda Ta’amu NT/DE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 6, 2012 6:07 AM CST up reply actions
Why?
I’d rather replace B-rich than Lilja. And G’s are typically not taken that high.
by AnkenyChiefsFan on Feb 6, 2012 3:22 PM CST up reply actions
Cause he is a much better prospect
We need to get stouter up front, screw what the passed picks say.. different now with a wage scale. Sanders in the 2nd? It shall not take too much to actually replace BRich. Of course this all changes with FA and possibly Grubbs/Nicks
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Alameda Ta’amu NT/DE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 6, 2012 3:33 PM CST up reply actions
DeCastro is a significantly better prospect
The line is the sum of its parts. No one position other than LT is more important than any other.
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I am the Master of Hyperenthetical Asiditry (you know, like this. Only more)
which is precisely why I feel it's more important to finally finish that OLine with DeCastro instead of trading away to opportunity and going after RG3
see how it all comes back around to DeCastro? damn I love this country! MN, you’re the bestest ever!!!
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
RG3 > DeCastro > the RT prospectsb
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I am the Master of Hyperenthetical Asiditry (you know, like this. Only more)
but Pawns can become queens. in fact, pawns can eventually become everything but a king. so....
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 7, 2012 9:12 AM CST up reply actions
so....
Then we should move Asamoah to QB?
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynicism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
why not?
I switched his position to QB on madden. he is a 12 overall but has A potential.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 8, 2012 6:45 PM CST up reply actions
Very well done
I’m convinced RG3 is awesome and more than likely will translate into a great pro. To me, If Pioli is interested, Cleveland is the main contender. It will come down to what Cleveland thinks of Blackmon/Richardson as prospects and whether they feel McCoy needs more time. Blackmon and Richardson will be the two picks they would look at at 4 if not RG3. I think (hope) they give McCoy one more year with some more weapons.
KC Draft prediction: No OT taken in first round
the thing about Cleveland
(and I haven’t watched McCoy) is McCoy has to look bad for them to trade up. There is going to be competition for that pick, so Cleveland would basically have to go all in, like every other team wanting to move up to #2. I’m not sure they’re even close to being in position to wager that much on another QB. And really, that probably has a lot to do with the reason McCoy hasn’t fared well.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 7, 2012 9:15 AM CST up reply actions
I think
if Pioli really wants him, he will do everything in his power to get him. Remember though… takes two to tango.
"The greater the struggle, the more glorious the triumph"
Eric Berry counted to infinity -- twice.
Twitter: @Mr_Hoosier
True on the tango
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I am the Master of Hyperenthetical Asiditry (you know, like this. Only more)
I have no doubt in my mind that STL will want to tango though
Blackmon should be there target. They’ve got a lot of money invested in Jason Smith and I think they’d like to give him and Saffold another year to sort it out at LT/RT, So I can’t see Kalil being there choice unless time runs out and they haven’t got a trade sorted. Meanwhile Bradford is screaming for a legit number 1 WR. But where we’re sitting Blackmon will be gone and taking Alshon Jeffrey or Micheal Floyd would be a reach. Cleveland is there ideal trading partner
KC Draft prediction: No OT taken in first round
by trentchiefsfan on Feb 7, 2012 2:30 AM CST up reply actions
RAC'd
Nice research, good thoughts.
Here’s a question. If Pioli moves up to get RG3 as his guy, does he start Week 1?
Twitter: @RaiderHater86
Can't see why not.
KC Draft prediction: No OT taken in first round
by trentchiefsfan on Feb 7, 2012 2:31 AM CST up reply actions
My fear of drafting RG 3
is that our O-line is still not good. If we have to give up lotso draft picks to get him, similar to an Atlana to Cleveland trade, that could hamstring us in the draft for a couple of years. Plus if we put him behind a line that still contains B-Rich, he’ll get injured. He’ll get David Carr-ed.
GREAT write up, thank you very much for posting
But you forgot about orton. With his solid play the last 3 weeks teams will be looking for him. Can take another team searching for a qb off the board
good point
I still think a smart team would draft a developmental prospect behind orton. His history just isn’t that great. Still could as a good stop gap imo
Franchise bowe
Trade to rams bc they’re in need of a wr, give up an3rd rounder? Just a thought, I love bowe and I’d hate to see him go, but Baldwin does look very good in the future. Just a thought of not having to give picks
in that scenario, i'd rather trade breaston and dorsey.
and then draft another slot receiver.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 7, 2012 9:17 AM CST up reply actions

by 


























