Mock Draft Thread 2/18/12 - 2/25/12 Rec it guys!
Alright our last post is past due and with some recent Chiefs news involving potential free agents the draft is becoming more interesting. The early favorite in the first round is David Decastro and he is a pro bowl guard prospect. With that being said I really like the potential idea of moving back and selecting Mike Adams in the early 20's. Barry Richardson is absolutely terrible and I believe the upgrade to RT is a more significant and a larger upgrade than Decastro over Lilja. I also believe that the interior offensive line is more deep this year than RT is. With all that being said here is my mock draft making a few assumptions:
Offseason:
Signings: Dwayne Bowe, Stanford Routt, BenJarvus Green-Ellis.
Trades:
The Chiefs trade pick number 11 to Cincinatti for pick number 21 and a second round pick this year, they move up to select Trent Richardson.
The Chiefs franchise and trade Carr to New England for pick 31 this season and a third round pick next season.
With those assumptions in place my draft is as follows:
1 (pick 21): Mike Adams, RT, Ohio St.
An instant starter and upgrade to Barry Richardson with the potential to challenge and push Albert and provide quality LT depth. Adams has the measurables and talent you look for but has inconsistency and work ethic issues. What i saw at the Senior Bowl was a player playing mad while others say it was him trying for a pay check.
1 (pick 31): Peter Konz, G/C, Wisconsin
I believe Konz slips a bit because of Decastro and Glenn going so high. A team that is in desperate need of a center might snag him but I really love the versatility and leadership he brings to our interior line. He can back up all three positions and push Hudson / Lilja for playing time immediately.
2. (pick 11): Stephon Gilmore, CB, South Carolina
A very talented and physical corner. With Routt and Gilmore we have a lot of versatility in our defensive backfield. Both are 6' 1" and very physical. I believe either one could play the nickel safety position we run and both are capable of manning up and being physical with tight ends or recievers.
2 (pick 21): Orson Charles, TE, Georgia
The most complete tight end in the draft who excels at being an inline blocker. He also has the ability to get out and make plays in the passing game. Moeaki and Charles should be able to form a solid duo and punish opposing defenses across the middle.
3 (pick 12): Alameda Ta'amu, DE/ NT, Washington
Defensive line depth and potential. Should begin at 3-4 DE and learn to two gap effectively while he adds strength and works on his game and in time could be part of a NT rotation.
4 (pick 11): Janzen Jackson, S, McNeese St (Tennessee)
Jackson was Eric Berry's teammate and played along side him at Tennessee. He has second round talent but falls because he was kicked off the team when he got in trouble with the law. Should provide quality safety depth and help on special teams.
5 (pick 12): Josh Chapman, NT, Alabama
Falls because he is a run stuffing defensive tackle with no pass rushing skills and because he is injured and played injured much of last year. Chapman has the strength to be a NT at the NFL level and should be a developmental NT to rotate with Powe.
6. (pick 11): Andrew Datko, OT, Florida St.
Datko is another very talented player that has injury red flags but he is a very hard worker and shows great athleticism and strength to be an offensive tackle in the NFL. Developmental depth with starting potential.
7. Beau Reliford, TE, Florida St.
A former basketball player that switched to football in his junior year of high school. Very good blocker at Florida St. Possesses solid hands and leaping ability and could be a developmental TE and depth.
7. Aaron Corp, QB, Richmond
A QB that was recruited to USC and possesses very good arm strength and accuracy. Has injury concerns and never seemed to put it all together but a late round flyer on his potential and because he could be a solid backup or possibly more.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.
617 comments
|
17 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
BOOOOOOOO
How many picks do we have right now ? I think it is 8. Anyway we need to go all offense
Ideal situation, trade whatever it takes to get Luck
2nd scenario
1, Jonathon Martin OT
2 Kevin Zeitler OG
3. Lamichal James RB
4. T.Y Hilton WR(Steal Alert ,Steal Alert)
5. Evan Rodrigez TE
6.Jeff Adams OT Or Chandler Harnish QB
7. Sean Baker S or Eddie Whitly S
'' if you’re expecting something to look real fancy or nice, I don’t think that’s what you’re going to see here with this Chiefs team'', Todd Haley
Aint that the truth
by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Feb 18, 2012 4:23 AM CST reply actions
Yayyy another small RB and another small WR!
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 18, 2012 5:53 AM CST up reply actions
Why do you need another 3 yards and a cloud of dust runner?
Dex , Charles, James, hell you would have speed in the backfield on every play not to mention you can move those guys around in the passing game. As far as Hilton goes, we don’t have much speed at WR. Breaston , Bowe, Baldwin aren’t 4.3 guys. We have plenty of size at WR. Speed, well that is a whole different story
'' if you’re expecting something to look real fancy or nice, I don’t think that’s what you’re going to see here with this Chiefs team'', Todd Haley
Aint that the truth
by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Feb 18, 2012 11:20 AM CST up reply actions
Why cant he be a big guy who can run it for more then 3 yards?
Why does it have to return to Marty Ball with a bigger back?
And what use is a deep threat if we have a QB who can’t get it there?
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 11:23 AM CST up reply actions
Hells bells
sign a rookie FA if you want a big back. But the league is going to faster quicker backs that can help in the passing game
'' if you’re expecting something to look real fancy or nice, I don’t think that’s what you’re going to see here with this Chiefs team'', Todd Haley
Aint that the truth
by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Feb 18, 2012 11:28 AM CST up reply actions
Why can't a big back also provide that?
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 11:44 AM CST up reply actions
umm physics
Generally speaking a guy 245 lbs isn’t going to be as fast and agile as someone that is 200 lbs. Besides, how many big backs(230 lbs or more) are guys that move around in the passing game?
'' if you’re expecting something to look real fancy or nice, I don’t think that’s what you’re going to see here with this Chiefs team'', Todd Haley
Aint that the truth
by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Feb 18, 2012 11:56 AM CST up reply actions
Well he doesn't have to be 230
I consider MJD a big back and he’s only 210 soaking wet.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 12:06 PM CST up reply actions
I love how you comment on scat backs like LMJ or Dex
That are both 175 lbs and he immediately jumps to 230 lb big backs. Like there isn’t a middle ground of strong backs at 210 lbs that still have that second gear and can make people miss.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 12:08 PM CST up reply actions
I wouldn't call a 210 lb guy a big back
'' if you’re expecting something to look real fancy or nice, I don’t think that’s what you’re going to see here with this Chiefs team'', Todd Haley
Aint that the truth
by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Feb 18, 2012 12:11 PM CST up reply actions
He is huge compared to 175 lb scat backs.
I get so annoyed watching Dex get tackled from the tiniest bump. And MJD or Ray Rice would both be offended if you didn’t think they were a pound the rock big back. They both punish people for trying to tackle them. But to answer your question from earlier, Tolbert is a big back that is involved in the passing game. How about Reese from Oakland? McClain is a big back that can be involved in the passing game.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 12:13 PM CST up reply actions
McClain caught what 14 passes
Reese is more of an H back. Rice and MJD are both strong thick guys(love me some MJD) I wouldn’t consider them big necasarily
'' if you’re expecting something to look real fancy or nice, I don’t think that’s what you’re going to see here with this Chiefs team'', Todd Haley
Aint that the truth
by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Feb 18, 2012 12:36 PM CST up reply actions
So now you are just arguing semantics
An H Back is a back right? It has it in the name. Rice and MJD are both very big backs. They aren’t fat or tall but they are built better than almost any back in the league. When we say we want to draft a bigger back we don’t mean a 240 lb mammoth of uselessness. A Bigger back means someone that can take the full workload and spell JC while being able to pound the ball and work out of the backfield.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 1:00 PM CST up reply actions
Guys like rice and MJD are the exception
You have to remember also, those guys are on teams with conservitive offenses. They get a lot of passes thrown there way because their QB’s don’t throw the ball downfield (especially MJD) so there stats are somewhat inflated
'' if you’re expecting something to look real fancy or nice, I don’t think that’s what you’re going to see here with this Chiefs team'', Todd Haley
Aint that the truth
by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Feb 18, 2012 1:04 PM CST up reply actions
Hmmm.
You say “conservitive” (sic) offenses, but it’s kinda the same thing that’s goin’ on with KC: They’re not really threatening to get behind the defense with speed, coupled to an arm that can deliver it past the defender any time the WR gets past the DB.
Funny thing, in this context, is my convo last night at our blues jam, with one of our guitar players. I live in the Denver area, and he, like most, is an avid Broncos fan. What he said was that Orton’s ceiling is 40 yards. Bottom line was that he was slow afoot and unable to un-cork the deep ball. For my part, I felt Orton was a good reader and student of the game, but, like Neil O’Donnell, in that knowing pre-snap isn’t the same as reacting post-snap.
Anyhoo, the issue with McCluster, last year, is relative lack of complementary downfield passing threats. I’d argue that this is the reason for MJD’s inflated numbes. In a way, to me, it highlights just how good MJD really is, because he’s still gettin’ those yards, even when everybody knows he’s their only threat.
We have some of the same thing going on in KC, but I think KC has the WRs that can tear it up, if they can ever find the time on the supply side of the pass to extend plays. Most seem to want to attack it from the QB direction, and I think that’d help. Some want to attack it from the RB direction, and while it might be fun to have a KC RB on your fantasy squad, for sentimental reasons, I’d rather attack that issue from the OL side.
Anyhoo, I’m partial to the MJD side of the RB makeup, myself. If you can win the lottery and land somebody just like him, that’d be great, but he’s been laboring in relative obscurity on a bad team in Jacksonville. Both they and the Chiefs could have something pretty special with a more dominant OL and a stronger passing game. I’m not sure they don’t GET a stronger passing game, just by giving the QB more time, on average, even though I don’t think Cassel is end-all be-all.
would of ≠ would've
McClain wasn't utilized by the Chiefs properly either
If at all besides blocking.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 1:05 PM CST up reply actions
Couldn't agree more.
I see a guy like McClain and I think to myself If you’re struggling on offense with a guy like this in your backfield, then you need to fix some other things. When he got pressed into service and was featured, I saw little wrong with his, but a dysfunctional offense that got his predecessor hurt.
Speaking of Baltimore, Grubbs is described as an above-average member of his position group, but I have pre-signing buyer’s remorse, already, about him. But then I’m more of a Flacco supporter than most. In him, I see a guy who could make all the throws on an offense that was working properly and I see his pocket collapsing too quickly on a regular basis, and I ask myself if I want to take a G from them. I know they’ve had injury issues at OT, but I’m just sayin’…
would of ≠ would've
I'd love to hear you tell that to his face
There’s a reason Haley called him a bowling ball covered in knives.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 1:06 PM CST up reply actions
Something like that. Rolling bowling ball of butcher knives, or something like that.
would of ≠ would've
I still think
we address RB in FA. Get Bush, Tolbert, Law Firm, preference in that order. Or spend a few more bucks and get Blount.
by AnkenyChiefsFan on Feb 19, 2012 6:04 PM CST up reply actions
How about a guy like Martin? dude is built very well while not being the slowest
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 18, 2012 2:26 PM CST up reply actions
I did the math yesterday....
Ideal situation, trade whatever it takes to get Luck
So the final bill to move up from #11 to #1 and draft Luck=
-2012 1st.
-2012 2nd.
-2012 3rd.
-2012 4th.
-2012 5th.
-2012 6th.
-2013 1st.
-2013 2nd.
-Dorsey (valued as a 3rd rd pick).
That leaves 2012 7th rd
and 2013 3rd-7th rd picks.
If you don’t include Dorsey or any other player, well then you’re looking at…
2012: All picks (2083 pts)
2013: All picks (833 pts)
2014: 2nd & 4th (103 pts)
for a total of 3,019 pts (2012 #1 overall = 3,000 pts)
All going off of the draft trade chart.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 12:16 PM CST up reply actions
going off of the draft trade chart (whether you believe it or not)
it looks like it would take
2012: 1st, 2nd, 3rd
2013: 1st, 2nd
If you traded players away to STL or to another team to accumulate picks,
you could essentially trade the 11th overall and tag & trade Carr (with 1st rd value) for RG III.
It’s really much easier to trade up to the 5th overall, if you think he’d still be there. In that case, the 11th overall, trade Dorsey (for 3rd rd value) and KC’s actual 3rd rd pick.
In fact, if you could get RG III with the 5th overall pick, could make some fans’ dreams come true.
Tag and Trade Carr (for 1st rd value) and trade Dorsey (for 3rd rd value).
You could essentially move up to #5 overall with #11+Dorsey+2012 3rd….and still have the 2012 1st from Carr to draft that stud LG (DeCastro) or RT (fill in the blank).
In that scenario, I think you’d want to know you have replacement level guys ready already on the roster or acquired in FA.
But right now, its just a lot of postulating. For instance, does Dallas have interest in Carr? Would they trade their 1st (14th overall) for him? How about the Jets? I believe Cromartie is on his way out. Carr looked great next to Flowers, how about Revis-island? The Jets have the 16th overall. Would they do it? Would Pioli do it? Who knows.
It’s all speculative and it helps me procrastinate from doing grad school homework….
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 12:59 PM CST up reply actions
You could substitute tag and trade of Bowe to STL with that #11 as well, I suppose.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 1:00 PM CST up reply actions
I guess I'm more of a systems guy. Name like "Mills," I'm bound to be.
You have a process in place that’s gathered the guys you have, and you want to maintain or improve across the board, or at least as many places as possible. I don’t like the idea of gutting your team to get the one guy and then stick the one guy on the field in a crap situation. This can get you caught in a personnel pendulum swing that has you getting more and more radical every year, to offset the radical behavior of the past.
While I’m not at all reluctant to look for a 5-tech, I’m not in a hurry to trade Dorsey off, before there’s somebody proven, who can step in. I think Gordon gave ‘em a workable 3-man rotation at DE, last year, but Bailey’s a situational pass rusher, until proven otherwise, in my book. I wouldn’t mind seeing one of the top DTs, like Devon Still or Fletcher Cox come in and compete for a job, but I wouldn’t want to enter the draft feeling I HAD to make such a pick.
I’m more of a trade-down kind of guy, especially for future considerations. But I’d want to stockpile picks a little while, to position myself for the trade-up in 2013. Of course, my detractors will point out that lack of a downpayment has me STILL renting in middle age, because I never wanted to take the risk on a house of my own, until I had saved up enough.
would of ≠ would've
So you have all that talent around Cassel who can't do anything
So what. Get the guy who can help you win at the most important position
'' if you’re expecting something to look real fancy or nice, I don’t think that’s what you’re going to see here with this Chiefs team'', Todd Haley
Aint that the truth
by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Feb 18, 2012 1:06 PM CST up reply actions
yeah, because Cassel is the only solution.
couldn’t possibly be re-signing Orton or signing Campbell, or Stanzi winning the job.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 4:26 PM CST up reply actions
those guys are average at best
'' if you’re expecting something to look real fancy or nice, I don’t think that’s what you’re going to see here with this Chiefs team'', Todd Haley
Aint that the truth
by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Feb 18, 2012 4:28 PM CST up reply actions
I do to
I just don’t want another Jag like Jason Cambell to go along with the jags we already have
'' if you’re expecting something to look real fancy or nice, I don’t think that’s what you’re going to see here with this Chiefs team'', Todd Haley
Aint that the truth
by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Feb 18, 2012 5:14 PM CST up reply actions
Haven't seen Stanzi play...
He didn’t really look “average” in college…looked pretty dang good.
by AnkenyChiefsFan on Feb 19, 2012 6:09 PM CST up reply actions
So did Blackledge...
I do hope he is the QBOTF, only because I don’t have a lot of faith in our leaders* to get us one…
*term used very loosely…
Tehee
Hello chiefs fans. Sorry to ruin your little mock there, but no way are you guys getting LaMichael James in the 3rd round.
Cool story
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 29, 2012 8:57 PM CST up reply actions
New Mock
FA: Dwayne Bowe, Le’Ron McClain, Brandon Carr, Travis Daniels, Shaun Rodgers, Braylon Edwards
1.12) Mike Adams OT – No way this guy is there at 21, after the combine I don’t see him escaping the top 15.
2) Amini Silatolu OG – Small school player that will sit behind Lilja until he catches up to NFL speed.
3) Antonio Allen DB – S Depth, with potential to start if needed
4) Dajohn Harris DT/DE – Developmental guy who will start in sub-packages and compete with Bailey
5) Vick Ballard RB – Good overall back, and a good compliment to JC/Dex.
6) Rhett Ellison TE/FB/H-Back – Great blocker with reliable hands
7a) Chris Galippo ILB – Good depth behind Belcher for now
7b) Danny Coale WR – Mr. Reliable, will do anything you want on the field. Great hands and route-running ability.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
Scratch out Edwards actually
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 6:04 AM CST up reply actions
Are you sure Adams won't be there later in the draft?
Everything i’ve heard of him is, even with his seinor bowl, he will be 30-40 pick
Dexter McCluster
After the Combine I doubt it
Even right now I don’t see him escaping the top 20, they can’t teach his size or athleticism.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 1:07 PM CST up reply actions
Oh, I think somebody will like him plenty, just from the Senior Bowl.
He’s likely to go top 20. Even if he’s more of a Nate Solder, those baseball mitt hands of his will let whoever gets him do some wacky tackle-eligible stuff.
Heh. I want OT taken in the top 2 or 3 rounds, for sure, but personally, I’m not so sure about OT in the 1st, although I could see picking Cordy Glenn after a trade-down and him ending up being a quick upgrade at RT, and able to move inside when Lilja takes a powder. Heh.
would of ≠ would've
Not the biggest fan of Gilmore
That is a pretty solid draft though
21-Mike Adams
31-Dwayne Allen
43-Lamar Miller
53-Chase Minnifield
76-Tommy Streeter/Nigel Bradham/Cyrus Gray
107-Ta’amu
140-Lucas Nix
171-Josh Chapman
204-Andrew Datko
223-Chase Ford/Josh Chichester
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
I would be one happy man
If we ended up with the players in your mock! I can only pray it happens…
by Joel Thomas Vazquez on Feb 18, 2012 10:23 AM CST up reply actions
HIT was talking to BAMF
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
I used the same picks as the OP, just switched players around
DeCastro was not available at 21
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 18, 2012 2:28 PM CST up reply actions
It's funny I actually had those first 4 picks and decided to move it around.
I like a lot of things about Gilmore and think he can really excel in our system. He is versatile and has great instincts. I would definitely be on board with this draft as well.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 11:24 AM CST up reply actions
His technique is just putrid though
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 11:26 AM CST up reply actions
I would agree that he is a little raw
I think Thomas could coach him up to be great. And he would really be our backup outside corner and third safety in my draft. I like him manning up the bigger receivers with route and he is great at press coverage which i love.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 11:35 AM CST up reply actions
Its not that he's raw
His techniques is just awful
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 12:07 PM CST up reply actions
Technique is taught and learned.
To me anything that can be taught or learned that the player doesn’t excel at means you are raw. You haven’t been trained up right and you haven’t learned your skillset. Gilmore is great when he is asked to take a man away, as long as it isn’t a burner. Gilmore is very good in zone and can break on the ball very well. I really like him as a high upside developmental DB. Versatility to play safety and outside corner.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 12:09 PM CST up reply actions
Or you just can not actually do that technique
I would take a lower DB for a guy that needs that much development
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 18, 2012 2:31 PM CST up reply actions
He is a developmental CB but he also is 6' 1" with good but not great speed.
He is very good in press coverage and he is instinctual and quick to react in zone coverage. He may need a bit of help with his backpedal and hips but both of those can be taught by Thomas 6’ 1" corners don’t grow on trees and he addresses both CB depth and safety depth and I believe he fits perfectly in that third safety role.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 2:44 PM CST up reply actions
I agree. I'd be pretty happy with either draft.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 12:18 PM CST up reply actions
Everyone who takes Minnifield always takes him later than he'll be available, imo.
There’s a CHANCE of getting him at #43, but #53?
would of ≠ would've
Just used CBS, like using Newegg now... its just a tool
I don’t think he would last til 53, but who knows.. didn’t think Powe/Mallet/Bailey/Houston/etc would last that long.. going to be some risers come combine time
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 18, 2012 5:13 PM CST up reply actions
Yes. It's a big week.
A lotta good players lookin’ to drop, for various reasons. Pioli’s pretty good at picking value where others aren’t picking.
I’m just suspicious of putting much weight into the combine. I still trust the eyes of the guys who see them play, live and on film. This is something Jerry Jones said during Senior Bowl week that’s sticking with me. Your spy-network scouts, doing due diligence all year long, if they’re any good at their jobs, ought to carry the most weight in your draft decisions. Knowing how they play, week in and week out, and how they handle themselves as men, with a little inexpensive asking-around, counts for more than running around in shorts after a month of training to run around in shorts.
A guy can have a great day, and run the 40 faster than he ever did, before, or ever will again, or (Brandon Flowers) can have a bad day, and his overall rating shove him to the bottom of the spreadsheet, because the sum of the columns is dragged down by the weak rating in the speed column. Anybody who watched Jerry Rice knew he was a beast, but he sucked at the combine.
I think the outfits whose ratings change significantly after the combine aren’t doing their due diligence or trusting the guys who are supposed to be doing their due diligence. The kinds of things I look for might show up in a cone drill that everyone else thought he failed, but I’m impressed by the tumbling move he made to recover from a spill he made, that killed his time. Those times are pretty arbitray. Jerry Rice might put in a poor time against the clock, but somehow he’d always win when he faced another man.
would of ≠ would've
but somehow he’d always win when he faced another man.
Unless, of course, he faced a Kansas City defensive back, who’d come up in his face and show him no respect, all day long.
would of ≠ would've
Rice did time pretty poorly, however he was faster than the 4.6 or 4.7 time
The guys who come to the combine and then come out of no where with the good times, actually helps us IMO. I don’t really recall a player we have went after in the early/mid rounds that was a real riser, while other teams have grasped at straws over them. Some kids can put in a good 40, get drafted before players that any of us like and give a shot at getting them later.
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 19, 2012 5:53 AM CST up reply actions
That was kind of my thought, but, as usual, some other thought obtruded and took over the com.
This time, it was how our defense played the ’9ers in the 44-to-9ers game. Receivers a non-factor. Attacking Steve Young, rather than keeping people back out of fear of their wideouts.
But yeah. While they’re team-building, especially, and looking to reach equilibrium, let other teams draft the men in tights, while our scouting dept focuses on PLAYERS.
would of ≠ would've
Broncos sure are liking Demairyus Thomas...
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 2:49 PM CST up reply actions
If Chiefs could get
Lamar Miller with 43rd pick, it would be amazing. Not to mention getting Dwayne Allen while filling a need in our O line. This would be a great draft.
Shoulda added another DB in the mix though
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 19, 2012 5:54 AM CST up reply actions
Been out the loop but...
Not sure where or what round
Hightower LB
Chapman NT
Maze. WR
Egnew. TE
Dakto. OL
BPA
I’d be happy with the Clark brain trust to use that money to lock in the homegrown talent!
"Stay Classy Kansas City"
by Mas Cervezas on Feb 18, 2012 7:10 AM CST via mobile reply actions
Not bad at all
Not a fan of RT in the first but at 21 getting a guy like Mike Adams is great. I like the trade scenarios as well. gives a couple of extra high round picks to get quality depth picks. Only issue I have is that it appears you’ve got Cassel penciled in as the starter. Grab Orton in FA and I 100% love this. A lot of people don’t like Orton as he isn’t a huge upgrade by any means, but there aren’t a lot of great, realistic options out there. I’d love Pioli to trade up for RG3 but I just don’t see it and every passing day Peyton Manning looks like he’s finished. QB needs to be improved for this team to make a realistic post season win. Orton can provide that
KC Draft prediction: No OT taken in first round
DAMN YOU FOR STARTING A QB TALK IN A DRAFT BOARD :)
(even though I agree with you about Orton!)
What a year! At least we have the Royals... Oh Wait!
hey we're stuck in a rut between the senior bowl and the combine with no FA signings
gotta breathe some life into AP just until the combine.
KC Draft prediction: No OT taken in first round
by trentchiefsfan on Feb 18, 2012 8:02 AM CST up reply actions
If Cincy was to move up to 11th to draft Richardson
they would have to give up the 17th and the 53rd. KC might have to throw in a late round pick this year or a mid round in 2013. Last year Jac moved up from 16 to 10 and gave up their 49th pick as well. 4 teams that traded in the first round last year and 3 of them gave up about a 100 points to move up. NE was the only team that screwed the other team, go figure…
I think this is important because we could miss out on Adams at 21…
-
Round 1. I dont know about Adams but at 17 I cant argue with picking him up.
Round 1. I dont know if NE would really give up a 1st and a 3rd for a CB… NE rarely goes and gets players unless they are getting GREAT value. If it did fall this way I could see us taking the 2nd best OG in the draft. Pioli loves to let his OL play a year behind someone then moving them into the lineup.
Round 2. The more I look at Gilmore the more I think he would be a great fit opposite Flowers in a year or two.
Round 2. Charles is going to be a straight beast…
Round 3. I dont know if Ta’amu is going to be here at this point but if he is this would be great value.
Round 4. This is one of Todd McShay’s five players that will emerge at the combine. He thinks it will be all about the interviews if he want to be a 2nd day selection.
Round 5. Cant argue with getting more beef.
-
All in all I cant see much wrong with this draft. If they sign the Law Firm then RB comes off the draft list. I also dont think they will have ILB high at all with Siler and Belcher. WR might get a look somewhere in there for a ST gunner.
What a year! At least we have the Royals... Oh Wait!
Who's the Law Firm?
"Stay Classy Kansas City"
by Mas Cervezas on Feb 18, 2012 7:56 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
lol....Ben-Jarvis-Green-Ellis
"I never went to bed with an ugly woman but I sure woke up with a few!"
/no skitzo
Haha!! Gotcha!
That’s funny btw
"Stay Classy Kansas City"
by Mas Cervezas on Feb 18, 2012 8:00 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
You missed a great BEEF post by ExRoyalsFan........check it out when you get a chance, hope all is well.
http://www.arrowheadpride.com/2012/2/13/2796471/setting-the-trenches-offensive-line
"I never went to bed with an ugly woman but I sure woke up with a few!"
/no skitzo
Still in school havnt had much time for anything but studying..
"Stay Classy Kansas City"
by Mas Cervezas on Feb 18, 2012 8:03 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Same here, but from the teaching end, making sure I'm on my game for teaching Calc III.
I think I’m going to look for a better, more available computer algebra system for the next time I teach the course. Maple has lots of functionality, but it’s not intuitive in its structure. You should be able to learn the language of math and build what you need from first principles. I really liked the lisp-based MACSYMA, because you’d just use lists like matrices, vectors, fixed or flexible arrays, all the same. building matrices by just making a list of lists, and the nonabelian matrix product always worked as expected, without worrying about how you named the damn thing. Want to do tensor analysis? Hell, just stick functions in the entries andd everything works as hoped and expected, and all the commands were pretty much what a mathematician would want them to be. Know the math and the ’puter falls into your lap, without having to read 20 pages of online man pages.
Ahhhhh. Those were the days. I was a student and the first Unix boxes were coming out and the first Computer Algebra Systems were coming out. Then they “Microsofted” all those CAS’s, and suddenly, it was HARD to build, for instance, a Gauss-Jordan reduction program from scratch.
would of ≠ would've
Wow! Don't know where THAT came from.
But you’re talking about being in school, and I’m thinking about that Sun 3/60 stuck in the basement of the science building, and me with a master key. That was back right before they passed nonsmoking laws, and there I’d be, drinking sodas after my coffee ran out, with the ashtray from the hallway dragged into that little box of a room. To think how that room must’ve STUNK the next day after I spent all night in there, a kid at a small school with this really cool toy to play with all night.
And here I am whining about reading 20 man pages, when I read that softcover, 2-inch-thick Manual, from cover to cover, learning how to talk back and forth between the algebra system and the file system, writing batch files that solved thousands of matrix ODEs in order to classify tubes embedded in semi-Riemannian manifolds for the differential geometer who wrote the grant that got that Sun out there to that 3rd-tier state college out in the sticks.
would of ≠ would've
We were nothin' and nobody, but somehow, two of us in the same class went on to get our doctorates.
Like a Division III player going on to be a perennial Pro-Bowler.
would of ≠ would've
Learning how to be a federal agent in the army
Law forensics crime scene investigation the whole shebang! Definetley tiring information ovrrload
"Stay Classy Kansas City"
by Mas Cervezas on Feb 18, 2012 2:51 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Wow. That's kind of a popular thing, these days, with all the crime shows on t.v.
Somehow, those cop shows of the ‘50s keep comin’ ’round.
I wonder what you’ll think of science, after you’ve seen it done in the real world. Nothing makes a guy more humble than calibrating his own buret.
would of ≠ would've
Prof. Mills.....you're going to have to dumb that all down for me...lol
……totally respect your passion for Math and learning in general. I’ll make sure to check in with you when my kids start Calc..anything!
"I never went to bed with an ugly woman but I sure woke up with a few!"
/no skitzo
Heh. Easy to seem smart when you catch people outside your specialty.
Inside my specialty, I’m FAR from special. Amongst mathematicians, I’m the funny guy, who sings better than anybody. Amongst singers, I’m the professor.
would of ≠ would've
Always the least accomplished in any group.
But able to hang with a lot of different groups. Mile wide. Inch deep.
would of ≠ would've
but amongst harmonica players you ARE The Man :-)
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
Hell no. And you haven't even heard me play, unless I pulled it out at Greeley Blues.
Pretty sure I had an ‘A’ harp stuck in my back pocket, that day. Definitely going VIP this year. Just would make things a lot simpler for me. Get me close to the beer, shade, and a chair I didn’t have to lug in there. My guys here in town know all those guys at the Blues Fest. I need to talk to ’em about shortening the distance a middle-aged cripple needs to walk.
If you’re gonna repeat as a helper, do me a favor and find a cool hat that’ll keep the sun off yer schnozz. A battered straw cowboy hat is a good choice. But a KC Chiefs ballcap is a good option. I have several vintages of those.
What I do with the harp is pretty unique, I’d say, but not really all that special. But my background as a decent trumpet player, with limitations, translates to a decent harp player, with limitations. I’m pretty good at coppin’ the signature licks (the melody) for a given song, but I approach it as a brass player, rather than as a harp player. Other guys just sense the potentialities of the instrument and bend their practice that way; whereas I just have this limited spectrum of ideas and try to bend the harp that way.
In other words, guys base their ideas on what the harp is built for, whereas I base my harp play on the ideas that I have. I could teach myself to play Little Walter licks, but those ideas don’t come to mind without listening to him and bending my efforts in that direction. Instead, I abuse the harp in unintended ways. Pervert, they call me.
would of ≠ would've
Prof......you amaze me!
………….Most of your comments go way above my head, and like I’ve said a million times, that is very easy to do. That goes for music, math and even football. You know what? I realize when I’m over my head and just read and try to learn. IMO…I’m a pretty humble guy and am not afraid to admit when I’m out of my league. So I stay in the back ground and try and see what you (and all the regulars) have in your noodles.
I am very impressed my friend. I’ve been around AP for a little over a year and am still a newbie (and will always be) since I’ve just caught The Chief bug. I’ll take my beatings like a man and tread on. I’ll never really be a true Chief fan, IMHO, you need to born that way, and I was not. But what I’ve noticed in this past year, is your growth. Please don’t take this the wrong way. I mean no harm, to you or anyone on AP…ever!!! What I have noticed with you is a openness. You’ve seemed to start to show your personality much more. I have to say, when it comes out it is so spot on and humorous. Please continue on my friend. I truly hope to meet up with you and Ups at one of these festivals some day! God Bless.
"I never went to bed with an ugly woman but I sure woke up with a few!"
/no skitzo
Bullshit
I’ll never really be a true Chief fan, IMHO, you need to born that way, and I was not
Chiefs fans are not born but Bred!
and as far as Mills I agree totally, I was also closed to newbies (friends) when I got here. Still sorta am but I realize these folks on AP can’t make fun of me but don’t hate me either
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 18, 2012 10:34 PM CST up reply actions
It ain't like I'll ever hand out my birth date or my social security number.
Or end my LifeLock subscription.
would of ≠ would've
why I got more money than you :)
dead anyway!
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 19, 2012 12:22 AM CST up reply actions
Ok....then I was hatched!!!
Chiefs fans are not born but Bred!
"I never went to bed with an ugly woman but I sure woke up with a few!"
/no skitzo
If Richardson
drops I think Chiefs should take him. But if they trade down for him I think they should get more than the 17th and 53rd pick
Mock-a-li-shish
David DeCastro (G) Stanford
Zebrie Sanders (OT) Florida State
Juron Criner (WR) Arizona
Michael Egnew (TE) Missouri
Winston Guy Jr. (S) Kentucky
Fangupo (NT) BYU
Asa Jackson (CB) Cal Poly
Andrew Datko (OT) Florida State
"I never went to bed with an ugly woman but I sure woke up with a few!"
/no skitzo
Love the beef and the TE
Could you imagine IF we drafted both of the Oline from Florida state: that’d be c Hudson g Zander’s rt Dakto
"Stay Classy Kansas City"
by Mas Cervezas on Feb 18, 2012 8:02 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
I have no idea what Datko will be but if he is still there, you'd have to give the kid a shot...........
"I never went to bed with an ugly woman but I sure woke up with a few!"
/no skitzo
I said it last year and I'll say it again
You have to focus on 1 big need at a time in the draft. Get 2-3 quality beef picks and then some other nice picks. Eventually it will be AO stacked that we won’t have to worry about taking a RB in the first round cuz we will be picking 32 over all
"Stay Classy Kansas City"
by Mas Cervezas on Feb 18, 2012 2:54 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Long-term, I don't like the focus on any one thing in any given year.
I do like a bias toward OL and DL until you’re starting to push people around pretty good. So early and extra picks, there, until you have something pretty special. So I’m on-board with 2-3 beef picks, and I include the prospective Rush OLB guys as part DL. But they’re also the kinds of players that, because their responsibilities will change so much at the next level, I’d make extra, later picks, because there’s a chance you’ll get that diamond in the rough, and it’s a fairly large pool of players.
OT late is only something I would do THIS year, if I really knew something extra about a guy like Datko, and he slipped, because of injury history. But until RT is fixed and OT has some depth (like a BACKUP better than B-Rich), my bias is towards the early rounds and the higher-rated prospects. Ironically, this doesn’t mean I’m wanting to spend a 1st on OT in this class, but maybe a 2nd and a 3rd, to hedge towards a higher floor, and higher NFL-readiness.
But on the surface, I’d be against taking a late-round flyer on an OT, until I had more faith in 3 tackles already on the squad. Mims as an UDFA? I’m OK with that. But I want higher-level prospects taking up my roster spots until I find a 3-tackle combo that can compete. That’s one of the reasons I’m partial to Cordy Glenn, because he could play G and give me options, until I’m SET at OT.
I’d rather be using my late-round picks on guys who slipped, but who score reasonable on the physical end, and impress the hell outta me in the football IQ category, like Kendrick Lewis was. Looking at this Chiefs team, I’m still looking for high floor with those late picks.
Now, if you think Datko is just a great player, flying under the radar, that’s one thing. But to me, those late-round picks are for middle-of-the-road measurables and exceptional IQ. Guys who can come in and not embarrass themselves as rookies. Guys like Kendrick Lewis, whose apparent understanding of the game far exceeds his years. I think Pioli’s been pretty good in the last couple years with that kind of filter. By the measurables, Carl Peterson was way ahead of Pioli, but Carl drafted a lot of athletes with that something missing upstairs.
would of ≠ would've
Late rounders are not going to make the Chiefs roster
so shotgunning the OL or DL in the 5-7 range is a no-brainer.
Wasting picks on QB’s to fight with Stanzi? Why
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 18, 2012 8:56 PM CST up reply actions
Kendrick Lewis. Round 5.
I’m sayin’ that until I see KC winning the surge up front, I’d have a strong bias towards trench players in the early rounds, and, having spent the early rounder on the trenches, I’m looking for BPAs in some other position group(s). Picking 5th-round OL for up-side is something I’d do after my returning starters were MUCH stronger and my #1 backup were MUCH stronger than what they had in 2011.
But that’s just me, going on and on about the same thing. :o) You’d think I’d get purty good at it, after a while, but nope.
Shotgunning OL and DL is something I’d much prefer doing, long-term, but I’d be biased towards the elite prospects, until I had an elite or near-elite unit in place. THEN I’d be doing the roster churn, there. But that’s just my weird take on personnel. OL, DL, WR, DB are positions I’d be hitting with the high draft picks, until minimum standards of performance were met. Then I’d go roster churn. On the flip side, RB, QB, TE, ILB would be roster-churned, until I got to where I could roster-churn in the trenches and start adding more of the elite skill players on top.
Pioli’s basically tried to hit all fronts, more or less, which could get ‘em to the same place, and maybe a little ahead of where my mad scheming would’ve put the team. But I’m one who’d rather build the trenches, and, while I’m doing that, hope the roster churn turns up the dark horse skill player, in a situation more likely to reveal those dark horse candidates. “Yeah, he’s just a downhill LB, but behind that DL, that’s all they want or need.”
would of ≠ would've
No RB and no QB?
Are you assuming we address this in FA?
by AnkenyChiefsFan on Feb 19, 2012 6:21 PM CST up reply actions
Orton, Green-Ellis
"I never went to bed with an ugly woman but I sure woke up with a few!"
/no skitzo
!
1) Robert Griffin 3/ qb baylor(trade-2012 1st&2nd/2013 1st)
3) Mitchell Schwartz/ rt cal
4) Bernard Pierce/ rb temple
4) Will Blackwell/ g lsu (glen dorsey trade)
5) Janzen Jackson/ mcNeese st
6) J.R Sweezy/ 5,de nc state
7) T.J Graham/ wr,kr nc state
7) T-Bob Hebert/ c lsu
*62m under the cap to spend
GIVE JAMAAL THE DAMN BALL!!!!!
by chief913-816 on Feb 18, 2012 8:43 AM CST via mobile reply actions 1 recs
your trade for RG III....
are you moving up to #3 or #2? The picks there value almost perfectly, though a tad low for #3.
But to move up to #2, you’re looking at more than 400 more pts (2012 3rd and 2013 2nd)….
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 12:21 PM CST up reply actions
#2 stl
This years 1st & 2nd, and next years 1st. Thats all the picks I feel we should give to move up 9 spots… The next scenario would be tag & trade carr or bowe. Either way if RG3 is piolis guy,theres 2 diffrent ways he can make it happen,& theres 62m to make up for lost picks. Id rather we trade the picks than to loose bowe or carr, but with the FA wr & cb crop this year, that might be the eazyest way to go.
GIVE JAMAAL THE DAMN BALL!!!!!
by chief913-816 on Feb 18, 2012 4:59 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Trading Carr for a center
is a terrible deal. Konz’s stock is overinflated since he is the only decent center in the upper rounds. No thanks, I’d rather stick with Carr and Hudson.
https://twitter.com/#!/super8kc
Konz is still a damn good center prospect either way
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 9:00 AM CST up reply actions
he is indeed, but if we get Konz what do we do with Hudson? he's too small to play OG ...
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
Konz is also the 2nd best guard prospect in the draft.
The way i see it, Hudson and Konz can both play LG and C. So let them both duke it out at both spots and decide that way. But really Konz is ideal size to play guard and is a great guard prospect. Hudson is better suited for center and is a great center prospect.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 11:29 AM CST up reply actions
then you're drafting Konz to play OG to begin with ...
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
I'm drafting him to be interior line depth and competition.
He can play all three positions and he will challenge and push all three positions. Versatility makes him a better pick to me than Decastro. If Weigy walks and we draft Decastro and then Hudson gets hurt who is starting at C? Lilja? Asamoah?
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 11:37 AM CST up reply actions
Lilja perhaps, yes ... Asamoah is starter at oher OG
we have nobody else at all?
but if Konz is there in 2nd … as long as we get DeCastro
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
Konz won't fall to the 2nd round
I doubt he falls to 31 although it is possible. And why would we go Decastro and Konz? Decastro is great but how valuable is a player that can only play guard? We carry 7 lineman often so we need players that can step in to other positions if needed.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 11:43 AM CST up reply actions
not so sure he can't play OT ... nonetheless, why DeCastro? because he's SO damned talented that he DRAMATICALLY improves the OLine
and given that we were DEAD LAST in Red Zone and near bottom in short yardage situations, that needs to be a high priority
and what better than The Best You Can Get
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
I'm sure he could play OT but he has 0 training there and that's a position that took albert 4 years to learn.
I understand the need to improve inside and instead of taking the best to improve it say a 9.0 I took the second best, probably an 8.5, and picked up an extra second round pick.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 11:55 AM CST up reply actions
fair enough
we just have different ways of doing things :-)
what really counts, of course, is Pioli’s way
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
Agreed and I do love decastro
If we stay at 11 then there are maybe 3 players i consider taking and Decastro tops the list. But I just don’t think you can pass up someone moving up and trading us a 1st and 2nd with a future pick.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 12:06 PM CST up reply actions
depending on who we get, I understand your point
but man … I know that Hudson is a strong and capable guy, he should be able to step into the Center spot immediately and play well … Asamoah with one year of starting is still young … and when I think of adding DeCastro and making that inside THAT solid for a decade …
ohhhhhhhhhhh man
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
My pipe dream is Manning checks out, physically, and the Colts decide to build the team
up around him. Suddenly, they’re trading that Luck pick away, and trying to engineer a plethora of picks to build a contender around their HOFer. Go out in FA and grab Peyton’s WR(s)-of-choice, and some top OL prospects, et voila.
Chiefs use the pick to grab RGIII, because we all want a guy who can MOVE, with a big arm and a big brain, pick up Grubb/Nicks/Meyers/Wells in FA and/or sign Demetrius Bell away from the Bills, while the Chiefs wait another year on making the big OT splash, with O’Callaghan, Richardson, Mims and Bell all starting training camp together, or maybe, if they salvage a 3rd-rounder outta the deal, grabbing an OT. Just a scenario or scenarios.
Heh. I can see the draft falling in such a way that Konz is the optimal choice. Worrying about who’ll play LG if you draft Konz is just minor details that get worked-out in training camp. Bigger G next to smaller C is more conventional, but due to prior experience, the reverse configuration might be better in the short term. It’s not so much who does better at either spot, but how they work together as a unit, unless, for instance, it’s discovered that Hudson just ain’t cut out to be a C, after all.
I can easily imagine Konz being as good or better than Hudson at OC, and Hudson being as good or better at pulling and leading the charge through the right side A- and B- gaps. Might make sense to make the bigger guy the pivot for the offense and having an ambidextrous running game based off that. Asamoah’s no slouch at pulling from the other side. The thing about Konz at LG, is, you might paint yourself into a pure drive-blocking corner. Same with Cordy Glenn. But if you’re IN that corner, these are the guys you want leading the charge! heh. But I have little doubt that an interior consisting of Konz, Asamoah and Hudson would be more intimidating than what we saw with Wiegs and Lilja (Sorry, guys!).
I definitely want a man-beast on OL with that 1st round pick, though. I’m not sanguine about RT, but I see 3 guys, there in the 1st, who would fix something glaring, right outta the box. I see plenty of RT prospects who would LIKELY be upgrade, but I see a lot of “developmental” to this class, and a lot of 1st-round prospects whom I’m not comfortable taking that high, just to address a perceived need. I don’t see that much difference between the Martin tier and the Sanders tier, just a little more self-honesty about that second tier as starting NFL OT prospects. I just have too many doubts about that supposed top tier being able to handle bull-rush right outta the gate.
would of ≠ would've
pass the pipe, Bogart
youv’e had enough
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 18, 2012 8:57 PM CST up reply actions
Surely you could've quoted that sentence with "sanguine" in it.
Gotta be my word of the fiscal year.
would of ≠ would've
I was probably too familiar
I looked it up since I am confident I did not understand it in context.
Thank you for teaching me the true meaning of that word today.
I always assumed it meant bloody sadness:)
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 19, 2012 12:37 AM CST up reply actions
I could live with DeCastro and Adams as 1-2 picks
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
Adams probably won't even make it to pick 21.
Post combine I think he moves ahead of Reiff and Martin. The guys is a physical freak, he is so big and strong and still able to move like he does, his “character issues” was trading memorabilia, he is said to be a great teammate and a smart kid but he lacks consistency which can be coached up.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 11:41 AM CST up reply actions
gotcha
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
Depends on the source of the inconsistency.
And these high draft picks are like marriage. You don’t marry someone for what you think they can become. You marry someone because you love the person they are.
would of ≠ would've
Not true at all
Otherwise the Giants wouldn’t have drafted Jason Pierre-Paul, and the Vikings wouldn’t have drafted Ponder, etc.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 9:19 PM CST up reply actions
I agree with the professor
Changing the person is a good way to become unhappy
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 18, 2012 10:40 PM CST up reply actions
But the first round is just as much about future potential
As it is about getting guys who can start now.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 11:15 PM CST up reply actions
in which case we might as well go DeCastro?
I understand people aren’t that high on the RT depth in this draft….but if Richardson is as bad as everyone makes him out to be, finding his replacement should be easy throughout the draft. Either people need to re-think their evaluation of Richardson, or re-think their evals of the RT crop in the draft and FA.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 12:23 PM CST up reply actions
That's why I'd be OK with taking a shot at Demetrius Bell.
Come at the draft without the urgency. With a lot of these guys, it’s not that you don’t think you can develop them. It’s about having to live with the growing pains involved with their rookie campaigns. You don’t just drath Anthony Davis and expect to still have your job the year after, because you need OT and he’s one of the top 5 OT prospects in the draft.
People talk about the spread infiltrating the NFL, and so they’re OK with these willowy OTs (heh). But to some extent, I see the top OTs as driving the NFL towards spread, because they aren’t elite bookends, in the classical sense. You pick that top guy, by the spreadsheet, and because he’s a high pick, you’re driven to get him on the field, and that drives what you can do on offense. Sure, you want Jake Long, but you don’t pick a non-Jake Long in the 1st, because you wish you had Jake Long.
would of ≠ would've
I want that also, RT Bell and maybe LG the kid from philly that PFF said was the best G this year.
read an article in the fan shots about him not getting the attention he should get and probably wont get the pay day he should get even though PFF had him as the best G this year. think his name was watkins maybe?
Evan Mathis. Glad you mentioned him. It's been Nicks and Grubbs only, in the convo.
http://www.footballsfuture.com/2012/fa/ol.html
Of all the FA OL out there, it seems like Bell is the most vulnerable to outside offers. Philly’s a team known for taking OL high, but imo, they haven’t gotten full value from all those picks. Every year it seems like OL is their limiting factor. Dream Team on the skill positions, but never quite enough time for the QB to execute/find his open guys down the field, or quite enough running room, when they need it.
I feel like they could draft, say, Cordy Glenn, sometime in the first, hoping he can help out at RT, but not needing him to, right away, and in the meantime, he’s put Lilja on notice. I do want a G who can do more to stop BJ Raji from charging into the backfield in short yardage. Lilja’s technique is pretty flawless. He might be tough to un-seat. But I have a strong suspicion that Glenn would quickly start (Said the same thing about Asamoah and Hudson).
And if they signed Bell on top of that, I’d feel pretty good about their situation in 2012. Bell would undoubtedly want a longer-term contract than I’d really want to
would of ≠ would've
yea thats him, my stupid brain dont work sometimes.
the article talked like he would be cheap too? probably not now that they posted about him lol.
Bell isn't a RT
He is a pass protector at tackle that struggle against the bull rush and in run blocking. He is a prototypical LT.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 9:58 PM CST up reply actions
I've heard he can play RT
He’s still a rather raw player, and tbh is better then B-Rich.
But he’s dealing with torn ligaments and may not even pass a physical by March.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 20, 2012 12:09 PM CST up reply actions
Hudson looked good at Guard in his limited time
Konz can also Play guard.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 11:45 AM CST up reply actions
You aren't trading Carr for a center.
You are trading Carr for a 1st this year and a 3rd next season instead of letting him walk. Konz isn’t at all inflated and i have him lower than almost any ranking. He is a first rounder
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 11:28 AM CST up reply actions
yep
the opportunity is to good to pass up
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 18, 2012 11:53 AM CST up reply actions
Your scenario has KC basically trading Carr for the 29th overall pick in this draft.
That 31st is essentially a 2nd rounder, and that 3rd next year has 2012 4th rd value.
So is Carr’s value only a top of the 2nd round pick and a 4th rd pick?
I think not….
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 12:25 PM CST up reply actions
rofl you just drop a 1st to a second and call it good like it's nothing.
His value is around a late first rounder in my mind. You could argue for 2 second’s and a 4th or something but i would rather just take our first rounder and move on. You are way overvaluing a hometown player. Try being objective and realizing that a team is trading for a player that has shown flashes of being a pro bowl player but hasn’t reached that level. He has never done it without a great corner opposite him and he hasn’t shut his side of the field down. He has done very well in one season but you are acting like he is a for sure shutdown corner when he is a great number 2 with shutdown corner potential.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 12:52 PM CST up reply actions
Carr has shut his side of the field down
And its not like Flowers follows the number one around the fiedl..
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 1:08 PM CST up reply actions
yes, I drop a 31st overall pick to 33rd overall pick and call it good like it is nothing.
because that is what it is. 2 spots.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 1:11 PM CST up reply actions
No, no, no, chief stevie_k. You have it all wrong. The 35th pick is a low 1st rounder.
You’re looking at it all upside-down.
Heh.
I personally don’t like the tag-and-trade for Carr. It’d take a serious difference of opinion between mgmt and player. But if he’s gonna walk, otherwise, I’d sure try to salvage draft picks out of his loss.
I’m OK with trading veteran DBs for draft picks, but it’s something I’d only want to do if my prior picks at DB made the veteran at least semi-expendable. The Chiefs are a year and another successful DB pick/project away from that. It’d take a helluva lot more pass rush than they now have, to get where I was very comfortable with Jalil Brown or Travis Daniels starting at RCB, based on what I’ve seen, to date.
If Carr DID get traded away, the Chiefs could then trade up a few spots to get Konz, with that late 1st, plus some other compensation. But we might be surprised at how far Konz or Glenn slip, depending on how the rest of the league assesses their needs.
But I’m not stuck on just one of Glenn, Konz or Decastro in the 1st. I’d like to take a closer look at that Troutman guy, for instance.
would of ≠ would've
the tag and trade Carr thing is a bad idea IMO
whats the point? Then we take that pick and draft another unproven cornerback?
it is free
and if we can’t trade we got Carr for another year
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 19, 2012 12:40 AM CST up reply actions
Tag and pay or tag and trade just says they failed to have a meeting of the minds.
I think most of us would prefer to just re-sign Carr for close to Flowers money, and keep churning roster. I can see the day when carrying two high-paid CBs could become an issue, but certainly not right now.
would of ≠ would've
I think a tag and trade is a good move because of the benefit of more picks.
I didn’t use a pick to replace Carr i signed Routt who i think would be a great number 2 here. And then you use that franchise tag and pick up some more picks for nothing.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 1:30 AM CST up reply actions
Not exactly nothing. If Carr is WORTH a 1st and Routt is not, then making this move IS a step backwards.
And anybody who sees things the same way you do is gonna just do the simple thing and sign Routt.
I think this is a false economy you have, here.
would of ≠ would've
Its not like any team can say
I want Routt so I’ll sign him. He has to want to play there and he has to feel comfortable in their system. I think he is a great fit in our defense and he wants to play here so he can prove the raiders wrong. That being said i do know that it is a small step backwards at CB but it is a very small step to pick up a pick or two.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 10:05 AM CST up reply actions
So you like Routt. I can see your point, but I'd keep the better, home-grown player, if possible.
Even before he started gettin’ his head around, Carr could hang with any wideout.
I’m not sure how much Houston, Bailey, Gordon, and even Gregg had to do with it, but I suspect better, more consistent pressure helped Carr take the next step and trust himself enough to look for the ball. It was a lot trickier in ’09, when they needed to blitz to get any pressure at all, and the safety help was so poor or nonexistent, and it was criitical that the lone CB not lose track of his guy. Carr was one who could stick, even if he sucked at making a play on the ball.
Given KC’s cap situation, I really think they’re better off keeping Carr, for Flowers-type money. Addition-by-subtraction @ DB is what a more mature team does, imo. Plenty of money to retain their best players, and make a few plays for someone ELSE’s best guys. But trading a quality 25-year-old starting corner away for picks just isn’t on my radar, right now.
would of ≠ would've
If Carr is a 8.8 out of 10 corner right now and Routt is a 8.5 corner right now
And you can get Routt for a million or two less a year and still be able to franchise Carr and get a couple extra picks, then why wouldn’t you do that? A small step back in one department but you still have a great player in that position and you free yourself up to make more moves with more picks. We can’t sign and trade Routt so by signing Carr long term we have a better CB but miss out on a late first round pick. I just don’t see the reasoning here.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 2:21 PM CST up reply actions
Because Routt is more like a 7 or 6
He’s a Man Scheme only corner, penalty-prone, Touch down-prone and isn’t a ball hawk.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 2:50 PM CST up reply actions
Agreed
We still run plenty of zone, showed his true colors last year in Oakland. No way he fairs better when he lines up opposite Flowers and gets more attention
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 19, 2012 3:11 PM CST up reply actions
Maybe I am missing the point
but if we lose Carr and don’t sign Routt, we have an even worse issue at CB. Whereas signing Routt and then Tagging Carr gives us coverage and pick(s) to get other players of need
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 19, 2012 3:18 PM CST up reply actions
That could happen.. but I can still see Routt wanting too much money
To realistically sign both. If I had to choose.. it would be Carr. If we do sign Routt to a long term deal.. pretty safe to say Carr wont be here for long.
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 19, 2012 3:23 PM CST up reply actions
do you worry that Buffalo or Cincinnati will out-bid us?
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 19, 2012 3:29 PM CST up reply actions
Depends how Pioli is playing it
Buffalo/CInci could be offering starting jobs, Pioli/RAC could be offering rotational
We have the money to outbid almost anyone.. just comes down to who gets the money(I vote me)
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 19, 2012 3:56 PM CST up reply actions
Don't we only have 30 mil in space since we carried over?
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 4:41 PM CST up reply actions
minumum 37 M
Maximum 57 M
seems to me anyway
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 19, 2012 4:46 PM CST up reply actions
We carried over the 20ish mil that we didn't use last season
So whatever the cap we would have for this year+the 20 mil is my understanding(note, I have not looked up a cap space figure with how things are now, no Bowe/Carr/etc)
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 19, 2012 4:57 PM CST up reply actions
87 Million though the Chiefs claim 100+ M
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 19, 2012 4:59 PM CST up reply actions
anddddddd that's why I didn't look it up haha
Knew someone would have it
Gosh.. gonna be hard to sign anyone with 87 mil
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 19, 2012 5:01 PM CST up reply actions
How is 87mil let alone 100 mil possible?
Cap stays around what it was last year 120ish…if we carried over 20 that would put us at 140 available and we are only using 40-53 mil?
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 19, 2012 5:05 PM CST up reply actions
No we spent 87 - 100 M
we have anywhere from 37 M to 57 M to spend
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 19, 2012 5:10 PM CST up reply actions
Makes more sense
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 20, 2012 5:46 AM CST up reply actions
So if we only got 37 million like they are saying now instead of 63 like they said before.
we probably should save 20 million to roll over next year ( we can do that right? ) and that would only leave us 17 million to spend this year? No wonder bowe and carr are having such a hard time getting signed up. I say save 20 million for next year cause it would suck not to be cap ready when that time comes but still spend that 20 million just in one year deals if possible. I just dont want to get into cap trouble and see a cap casualty happen and knowing how albert needs resigned next year Im not comfortable knowing that. sucks we dont have the 63 we thought we had. now it seems we are broke only having 37 to spend.
Well we could have 57 mil on the high end
Not far off the 63 mil a lot of people are reporting
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 20, 2012 5:48 AM CST up reply actions
Well I think if we do sign Routt
We’ll be running more bump-and-run man, I actually think we’ll do that whether we keep Carr, sign Routt or not. We looked fantastic when we started to run more of that to end the last 3 games of the year.
Flowers is a perfect fit and Carr does a dang good job as well.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 4:45 PM CST up reply actions
when we stopped giving em 5-10 yard cushions we looked a whole lot better
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 19, 2012 4:47 PM CST up reply actions
I stil don't understand that
I swear teams would need 3 yards and we’d give them 5 yard cushions.
Big plays killed us, but they seemed to happen when we ran Zone and our 2ndary was confused on who to cover.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 4:54 PM CST up reply actions
CB's handing off to non-existant Safeties didn't help
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 19, 2012 4:56 PM CST up reply actions
This is what I mean by a confused 2ndary
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 5:13 PM CST up reply actions
Need two more guys with speed and brains back there.
Hopefully Berry will be one of ‘em. Be nice to have better make-up speed in the 1st guy off the bench, too. Then things don’t get bent outta shape if Lewis or Berry sit out a play.
would of ≠ would've
He was playing man only because that's what oakland runs
They run no help over the top man scheme only defense. And he grabbed receivers rather than get beat over the top. The way they used their defense last year was ridiculous. You can’t invest 30 million a year in your secondary and expect to win. And if Routt is as bad as you say then we can get him cheap.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 3:37 PM CST up reply actions
So lets go for Routt even if he sucks cause he would be cheap?
Come on now…
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 19, 2012 3:55 PM CST up reply actions
Yep he is terrible, guy shouldn't even be in the NFL.
And Carr is a top 10 corner. Lock that guy up.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 4:06 PM CST up reply actions
I do consider Carr a top 10 guy
Or close to it, same as Flowers.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 4:43 PM CST up reply actions
I think you are being sarcastic
Sabby doesn’t belong in the league. Routt does
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 19, 2012 4:49 PM CST up reply actions
Wow.. someone disagrees and this is how you take it?
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 19, 2012 4:59 PM CST up reply actions
It's the general opinion of the mass around here
Overvaluing hometown players and undervaluing players from other teams. No objectivity and complete contradictory opinions from the same website. If you use your eye test then that is fine but tell me why. I argue with my eye test and others pull out PFF stats and then want to draft Decastro to replace Lilja over drafting a RT to replace the worst OT in the league last year. Also the general apathy towards making a play towards a first round QB at all. Just sign Orton and hope we can make it to the playoffs and get trounced every year.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 5:10 PM CST up reply actions
i think the apathy comes from
Our own team, I don’t think anybody believes that Pioli will trade up to grab a QB.
I feel the same way.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 5:15 PM CST up reply actions
Pioli may be proud and he may think he is smarter than everyone
But he certainly isn’t dumb. He knows how important a QB is to a team and he has seen what a great one can do for you for 10 years or more. At some point he is going to have to go out on a limb for one. Or just sit back and pray every season to find another Brady… which won’t happen.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 5:17 PM CST up reply actions
I just don't see it
He’s always preached trading back in the early rounds, I doubt that stops this year.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 5:30 PM CST up reply actions
I doubt it stops this year as well.
I don’t want to trade up for RG III and Luck would cost too much. However if we stock up on an extra first and second next season we could move up for a top QB next season.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 5:52 PM CST up reply actions
Always next year with some people
:(
Carpe Anno
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 19, 2012 6:37 PM CST up reply actions
I see RT as a major need.
But I’m not confident that a 1st-round pick from this draft class instantly solves the problem.
And Decastro is an elite OG. If there were no trade, he’d be my guy. I’d prefer to get a trade-down and take my flavor of the day, Cordy Glenn, because I think he’d be a dominant player, giving me 10 years of tinkering with QBs, knowing that my QBs would have that nice cradle of love to step up into. It’s no accident that New England went after our best G last year.
I’ve seen enough not to be confident with Cassel, but I’ve also seen inconsistency up front that’s stood in the way of his development, and will stand in the way of any QB KC wants to develop.
I think the Carr-for-picks is a nice idea, but I’m with most of the rest in thinking the better value to the team is retaining Carr. Keep throwing talent at the position group, and the day will surely come when another team gets in a bind and you’re in position for such a deal for Carr (or even Flowers!).
I think Flowers is averaging about $8 million a year. I would definitely NOT want both Routt and the Brandons. But I could definitely see drafting a guy like Minnifield, and retaining Carr.
As far as needing trade-up ammo, I think there’s always enough ammo, if you really want to make such a move. So as long as they don’t get stupid this go-round, they’ll have enough picks to move up if they need to, and they’re really one year away from having a team to warrant treading water on the Team front, while they attack on the QB front.
I don’t like the trade-up, NOW, because you get RGIII now, and maybe it highlights the one thing you need to fix, in order for him to prosper, and you’re in a very weak position to fix what ails you.
would of ≠ would've
inconsistency up front?
It is a fact that Cassel makes offensive lines look terrible. Just look at NE’s lines the year before and after he was there. Look at the last 3 games with Orton. Cassel is indecisive and he panics under pressure.
New England went after our best guard because their guard got injured not because that position is incredibly important. Adams is about the only RT that i think could step in and start day one and be a good starter.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 10:17 PM CST up reply actions
I agree with the 1st paragraph
completely disagree with the second.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 20, 2012 3:09 PM CST up reply actions
Some are not really convinced that Martin/Reiff could be a good RT
Martin might be a pure LT, Reiff could end up a guard.. then you have DeCastro who is a beast inside, which we do need help there also. We have been killed in short yardage/goal line situations, so DeCastro does make a lot of sense.
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 20, 2012 5:51 AM CST up reply actions
Umm no
They tried zone last year, and that’s why he got torched for tons of touch downs and was slapped with tons of penalties due to his over-aggressive grabbing nature.
The year before with Nnamdi they ran Man Scheme 24/7, and that’s why both he and Nnamdi graded so highly.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 4:43 PM CST up reply actions
Some quotes from Raiders fans on the very subject
I think Routt is a decent CB, but he was getting paid way to much, I dont think anybody could dney that. I also think that Routt could end up being a real nice addition for someone if they play him on the outside and in a lot of man coverage. Hes terrible in the nickle and in zone, but if you keep him out of those situations as much as possible he can be a good CB for someone.
Thats just ignorant and thats just misleading. Was he a Top 5 CB? No. Was he Top 20? Yes. He was good in coverage for the most part(Even tho our DC made him play Zone when Man Coverage is his strength). Hes going to be one of the better Corners hitting Free Agency this year.
Just don’t put him in the slot, or any kind of zone coverage and you’ll be alright, more of a high end #2 than a true #1 CB…
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 4:52 PM CST up reply actions
So he is a top 20 corner and great in man coverage.
Sounds great to me. Why run zone when Flowers and Carr both seem to excel in man along with Routt. As long as we don’t run the off man then i am fine with it.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 5:11 PM CST up reply actions
For sure I agree
I think we move to more of a press scheme anyways
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 5:12 PM CST up reply actions
And really if Carr is a top 10 corner I see more of a case to trade him.
We can sign a top 20 corner and keep a top 10 corner and trade our third top 10 corner for picks. Brown, Daniels, Arenas are all solid third and fourth corners. Routt should be a solid number two and it allows us the ability to stock up picks to make a move for a QB.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 5:16 PM CST up reply actions
You're not gonna find many of us eager to trade off Carr.
Carr and Bowe are tied in my book as #1 signing.
I’d rather make yet ANOTHER DB pick and try like hell to develop Brown and Arenas some more. Time enough to trade for a 2013 draft pick after I’ve seen where the ceiling is for Brown and Arenas and possibly 1 or 2 other good prospects.
If your purpose is to stockpile 2013 picks, there’s a whole year of developing players between now and the 2013 draft. I think Daniels is about perfect in his current role, but I’m NOT as confident as you are that this defense just ticks merrily along without a hitch, if I send Brandon Carr packing. That’s like taking 2 steps forward and 3 steps back, when it’s not really necessary.
They can keep the whole team on the up-tick in 2012, without sacrificing any trade-for-picks deal pre-2013 draft, can’t they?
would of ≠ would've
I'm not relying on Daniels or Brown to step up
I am relying on Routt to be the shutdown man corner he was a season ago. In man coverage I don’t see much of a difference between Routt and Carr. Both are very very good. And yes theoretically you can stockpile at any time that trades are allowed but what if Carr has a year like Routt had this season and ruins his trade stock.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 10:31 PM CST up reply actions
Routt is a number 2 corner
Remember that.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 11:52 PM CST up reply actions
And a year ago Oakland fans thought much the same way we do about CArr
One bad season can change everything
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 11:59 PM CST up reply actions
That season
He was covering #2 WRs while Nnamdi followed the #1, they were fooled as Raiders fan are ought to be.
Carr has stayed on his right side his whole career, and seen his fair share of #1s. Its not the same situation at all.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 20, 2012 11:59 AM CST up reply actions
I'd definitely be happy with that draft Jonathon
Only changes I would make are grabbing a QB like Oswieller or Weedon in the 4th and taking Jackson where you have Chapman. Then grabbing Gallipo and a wide receiver in the 7th.
This will be my last mock until the combine
1. David DeCastro OG STAN
2. Lamar Miller RB The U
3. Bobbie Massie OT OLE MISS
4. Juron Criner WR ARI
5. Josh Chapman DT ALA
6. Brandon Taylor S LSU
7. Miles Burris LB SDSU
7. Hebron Fangupo NT/DE BYU
by Joel Thomas Vazquez on Feb 18, 2012 10:07 AM CST reply actions
I could live with that
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
Tell the truth, ups...
As long as it goes 1. DeCastro….2-7 doesn’t matter as much to you…
by AnkenyChiefsFan on Feb 19, 2012 6:35 PM CST up reply actions
I'd rather go TE or RT in the second
I think if we re-sign McClain and sign BGE, we’ll be good at RB…for at least another year. But if you must, later round or UDFA RB.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 12:27 PM CST up reply actions
Could live with that as well
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 18, 2012 2:34 PM CST up reply actions
Until THE combine
Not until I combine
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 18, 2012 5:09 PM CST up reply actions
Where underachievers can become 1st round picks
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 18, 2012 5:12 PM CST up reply actions
As long as you're not SWAYED by the Combine, ya gotta LOVE the combine.
Still, it’ll be nice to get a look at guys I didn’t get to see at the Senior Bowl. See how they look next to guys I’m at least partially familiar with.
would of ≠ would've
and who the Chiefs talk too
and very important who they don’t
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 18, 2012 10:43 PM CST up reply actions
Chiefs Mock
1st-Johnathan Martin
2nd—Dontari Poe
3rd-LaMichael James
4th-Marcel Jones
5th-Darron Thomas
6th George Bryan
Love Chapman & Ta'amu in the later rounds! Also like the first round picks!
So has the love affair with DeCastro finally passed over?
Question Jon?
With $63 million in cap space & all we do with it is resign Bowe & sign Routt & Green-Ellis? I would be quite pissed! Resign Orton? Save it for 2013 offseason?
the problem with re-signing Orton is the number of years IMO
either he is the starting QB for the next 3-4 years or he won’t sign here
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 18, 2012 10:24 AM CST up reply actions
I'd have ZERO problems with giving Orton the keys for 3-5 years
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
that said, I absolutely see a need for DeCastro ... solidify the middle, not just for QB protection (which he'd provide) but also short yardage and Red Zone push
he’s simply THE BEST out there … that whole interior would be set for years with DeCastro-Hudson-Asamoah
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
and the QB position?
I think I would tire of Orton after awhile. Better than Cassel but probably not the ONE
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 18, 2012 11:55 AM CST up reply actions
and says you can't continue to develop Stanzi? who says you can't draft others?
visibly MUCH better than Cassel, knows our guys, cheap enough and not only Romeo but the other guys love him … what’s not to like?
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
With no strings to any FA QB, at the moment, Orton would just be another QB in the mix.
I have a strong suspicion that I’d like somebody else more than Orton, in a larger pool than the one he was picked from out of desperation in 2011. Love his savvy and his touch on the ball, but I’d prefer someone more likely to extend plays for the double move and have the bigger arm to go deeper than Orton or Cassel, either one.
would of ≠ would've
no problem with 8-8
and guaranteeing extending our streak of no sb’s another 3-5 years
Carpe Diem
by TEXAN_CHIEF on Feb 18, 2012 12:11 PM CST up reply actions
oh joy,we get Grbac 2.0 for 3-5 years!
just stab me in the face repeatedly with an ice pick instead Ups. Geez, I know you want DeCastro, but didn’t think you wanted to go there! I see… in the future…. 9-7, 10-6, 7-9, 9-7, 10-6, 7-9, 9-7,10-6,7-9.
Well i'm sure there will be several other small depth moves but I still don't see us making a big splash
We all got excited last season with all these NT’s that would be free agents and every single one got franchised or resigned. The same will happen this year. I also don’t think the elite guards make it to free agency although if they did I would be more than happy to sign one. It’s all about where you spend your 63 million. I don’t want to tie up all my cap space in a rather weak offseason.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 11:31 AM CST up reply actions
Agree, to an extent, and YET,
Breaston was a good pickup last season. And Gregg and Gordon were solid, if not All Pro. And I’m a pretty big fan of Le’Ron McClain.
I THINK Pioli made a play for some of the bigger-name FAs, but couldn’t entice them to play in KC in 2011. And it’s a new ballgame, with RAC at the helm. That could make a difference in what they can achieve in FA. So could just giving it another try. Most nights, the first girl you ask usually ain’t the one you went home with. Oops. Projecting from my own past predations.
would of ≠ would've
Some of it's luck, and being able to be aggressive where others aren't.
What if there’s a feeding frenzy @ WR, and some teams take themselves out of the race at other position groups, as a result? It kinda depends on what the rest of the league does. If there’s a strong trend, the contrarian might do himself more good somewhere else, rather than taking the 6th-best when everybody else has nabbed #s 1 thru 5 out from under you.
would of ≠ would've
Maybe the Chiefs
are going to make a move for Drew Brees. He hasn’t signed a new contract yet, maybe the Chiefs throw the bank at him and make him a Chief.
by Joel Thomas Vazquez on Feb 18, 2012 10:28 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
I can see them making the obligatory PLAY for Brees, but I think he's a New Orleans icon.
They do a lot right in that organization, and retaining guys like Nicks is as much a matter of retaining Brees, as it is a matter of worrying about having enough $$$ to keep Nicks, after Brees is signed. I strongly suspect they keep Brees AND Nicks. Wouldn’t stop me from making a play for BOTH of ‘em. Myself, I’d be making first-come, first-served offers to a BUNCH of guys, and just adjust the draft, accordingly.
would of ≠ would've
NO WE ARE NOT DRAFTING MIKE ADAMS!!!
Do you really think Scott Pioli is going to draft a guy with character issues as well as being suspended the first five games of the season?!?! NO
3 Chiefs Wishes:
1. Draft Trent Richardson in the 2012 NFL Draft
2. Sign Dwayne Bowe to a long-term deal
3. Keep Brandon Carr and Leron McClain
he DID break the rules, have to wonder about value judgement and ethics
and not sure he’s worth a 1st Round pick even trading down
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
I don't think its anything to worry about. Poor college kid. They all r. I personally think its an ignorant rule
"poor" is relative
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
There's no question in my mind that college players are exploited.
They take the same risks and generate money at a far greater rate than the rate at which they are compensated. This is a grassroots, progressive labor issue, in my book. I’d expect you to be all over this, considering your leanings.
Sure, you question the ethics and the heart of the player, and it could (should) affect your decision-making, but the larger issue, to me, is a set of rules that exploits the players pretty egregiously. You can make some sort of 3rd world argument that it’s giving guys a chance, who wouldn’t otherwise have a chance. But after your system’s been in place for awhile, there’s no excuse not to follow 1st-world standards in your labor practices. The college game’s been making a lot of money for those institutions, and the players should at LEAST be making a decent living wage, on TOP of the education that the institution can offer to an extra 40 bodies, at very little cost to itself.
would of ≠ would've
Oh, come on...
Many/most of them get a free education…that’s worth 6 figures in many cases.
by AnkenyChiefsFan on Feb 19, 2012 6:39 PM CST up reply actions
I've taught those kids. And they're not in a very good learning situation, most of 'em.
Most of ‘em taking the bare minimum and doing the bare minimum, while their whole focus is on the aspect of their life that’s full of action, praise and glory. Many of ‘em deficient academically, and unable to fully benefit from a lot of the classes they stick ’em in. They try to fix that, of course, but for a lot of players, it’s just high school, with more glory and their own place (a tiny dormitory room).
would of ≠ would've
Wish I had had their position....
Instead, I owed $40K out of college…my wife, $100K…(course, she’s a pharmacist, so that is paying for itself…as a teacher, well, I got what I paid for, I guess…)
by AnkenyChiefsFan on Feb 20, 2012 8:56 AM CST up reply actions
Heh. I borrowed $7,000, just because I never had, squandered it.
Then stayed in school for freakin’-ever, getting my PhD, congratulating myself on the free pass I got, called a “deferment,” since I was still schooling. Took me close to 10 years to pay off the $20,000 it ballooned to, by the time I entered teaching, taking the first job – a visiting professorship – that paid pennies, just because I wanted to live in the mts.
I never went to a high-dollar school, though. I could’ve just lived on a shoestring the whole time and graduated debt-free. Dumb-ass. But I wanted what I wanted, when I wanted it, and I DID get to check out high-mtn fly-fishing, for little more than the price of the equipment I slowly collected.
But those years of poverty prepped me well for living within my means. They don’t always. Some folks wanna live large as soon as possible and plunge even deeper into debt. Me, I was so used to livin’ on next-to-nothin’ that the only thing that really changed after I left school was a Cajun Steak ‘n’ Shrimp at the Oasis, to kick off Friday Nite Seminar.
would of ≠ would've
nice relative ethics
the kind of character you want is what embodies the mature young man. In the face of crisis, he holds to right and rejects wrong.
Poor college kid. hmpf. Go drive around a campus parking lot. Collegiate athletes have it very nicely. Especially football and basketball players. Imagine having to pay for your books while your tuition and room and board is provided….give me a break.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 12:30 PM CST up reply actions
Tbh I don't see it as a big deal
Definitely not as bad as Baldwin throwing his QB under the bus, or Houston for smoking the ganj.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 1:09 PM CST up reply actions
if you're going to get relative, at least be smart about it
who did Houston hurt by smoking Pot? Houston.
Who did Adams hurt by selling his crap? His whole team and his coach. Adams and fellow rule-breaking teammates hurt his whole team (and as a hawkeye fan, i’m happy). Teams have rules, institutions have rules. This guy selfishly did what he knew was wrong, and for what? His coach got fired and his team has all kinds of sanctions.
Sure he didn’t act alone, but HIS decision still hurt the team.
Neither one of your examples did.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 1:15 PM CST up reply actions
pioli doesnt care as much about criminal stuff
More about"football character". Love of the game, works hard, understands the game, coachable, versatile, etc.
An arrest or suspension doesn’t rule out a player that fits the mold
by stagdsp on Feb 18, 2012 2:12 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
exactly
but what Adams did is different. If doing something detrimental to the football program as a whole isn’t part of ‘football character,’ what is?
He didn’t just make a stupid decision to smoke pot before the combine (which does reflect poor decision-making) or throw a qb under the bus. Adams’ decision (and others) will be affecting Ohio St. for the next few years.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 4:23 PM CST up reply actions
Eh, only detrimental to the team because its college
Would he be suspended in the NFL for something like that? No, and to that extent I don’t think Pioli cares to much.
And you could say Baldwin throwing his QB/Team under the bus does hurt the whole team.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 4:58 PM CST up reply actions
Those kinds of rules are stupid. If a guy can use his fame to make money off autographs, it should
be his right to do so. It’s an artificial rule that, imo, is a consequence of other stupid rules about open and honest compensation to the players. How easy would it be for alumni to funnel money to star players, just by lining up at signings, defeating the spirit of NCAA regulations?
OTOH, if they just admitted that NCAA football is minor league pro ball, and paid players accordingly, with the advantage of these young men being put right where they can do their minds the most good, if they so chose, it’s a win-win all around. Maybe just have a minimum requirement that they take at least one or two classes, with 4-year contracts, so that at the very least, they’ve made some money, and for the kids who need remediation, 4 years with a concentration on the 3 Rs (starting with study and life skills, if they’re deficient in THOSE areas). and they have some money in the bank, and are ready for college.
Some players would be able to just use the 4 years and graduate with real degrees. Some maybe end up 2 years or 1 year away from a degree. But it has to be better than just throwing a kid into a 4-year program, ready or not (depending on which public school he attended), having to take classes full-time AND working 20 hours (at least) a week on his game, when it’s likely he gets stretched too thin to really leave college at the end with a meaningful degree.
Some of these guys have no idea what they could become, and they just take the easiest path to graduation, before they have the foundation laid to where maybe they’d pick something else entirely, but they weren’t educated enough as entering freshmen to even be aware of the possibilities.
Sorry to go off.
would of ≠ would've
But, but, but
We can’t corrupt the children ;-)
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 10:35 PM CST up reply actions
I've always said no to DeCastro at #11. I can't understand taking a G that high & lots of people said he's the best available
I’ve always said T & now everyone seems to agree that Adams over Richardson is a signifigantly bigger upgrade that DeCastro over Lilja. This is what I’ve been saying all along so y the sudden change?
I see it as the same, upgrade-wise honestly
I’m just tired of mocking DeCastro to us in the first, its too easy and boring.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 11:02 AM CST up reply actions
But it might be the smart move
Pioli goes for lower ceilings and higher floors with his 1st round picks (exc Berry)
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 18, 2012 11:05 AM CST up reply actions
dammit
Pioli likes safe with his 1st rounders. Lower Ceilings with higher floors (exc Berry)
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 18, 2012 11:06 AM CST up reply actions
What about Baldwin?
I don’t think he fits that mold.
Only thing I’ve learned from Pioli drafts over the years is nothing, he’s too unpredictable. We thought we had him figured out as only targeting choir boys, then he drafts Baldwin and Houston.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 11:14 AM CST up reply actions
his second draft he got all captains to he would have his leaders in place
then last year he just got the best players reguardless of character cause he had the leaders in place already. More of the same this draft? Hopefully. Its the way I’ve interpreted his drafts to this point
Well most of the last draft was captains
But yeah, its just unpredictable.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 11:24 AM CST up reply actions
and most of the 2010 was (unless that's the "previous" you refer to)
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
I think the only think we can reasonably say
Is that he likes to draft players that come from a big program and have played against tough competition. He likes leader and experienced players, not one year wonders. And as far as the players… he likes big, strong, fast, smart football players if i remember right.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 11:33 AM CST up reply actions
and DeCastro's major is Science and Engineering
he’s big, he’s fast, he;‘s physical, he’s smart … kaching! we have a winner!!! :-)
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
Honestly i stopped mocking Decastro when I saw you had him haha
You have man crushes on great players but Pioli seems to go the other way lol. And I would be fine staying at 11 and taking Decastro but if a trade presents itself to allow us to pick up an extra second rounder or a future first we have to take it.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 11:39 AM CST up reply actions
LOL
I know, I’m still on the guy so that pretty much assures us of going some other direction ;-)
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
you weren't on the Berry bandwagon?
I don’t think that pretty much assures we’re going some other direction.
In fact, quite the opposite. In what major “pro” mock draft, has DeCastro been mocked to KC? None!
It’s all OT..OT…OT. I’m starting to think they just copy and paste each year, only updating the names. We’ve supposed to have had a new LT for 4 years now.
All the mocks i’ve seen this year say RT or QB.
DeCastro has that Berry essence to him.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 12:41 PM CST up reply actions
Year after year, they continue seeing OT as a KC need, and rightly so.
As for me, I’ve been pretty OK with them staying out of the 1st round on OT the past couple seasons, but I AM bothered by the absence of a decent OL pick in ’09 and taking both Arenas and McCluster before spending another 2nd/3rd round pick on OL in 2010. I recall liking Monroe in ’09, but finding it tough to figure him unseating Albert, and IIRC Monroe @ RT was considered a waste.
I think the most glaring weaknesses have been OG and RT, since Pioli arrived. Those first two drafts were real head-scratchers in the 2nd, for me. First Cassel and then McCluster. I could rationalize both decisions, but addressing OL with either or BOTH of those picks, and I’d be on-board with the lunatic Suck-for-Luck fringe.
would of ≠ would've
You assume that there were viable candidates
for the O-line and that we would chose wisely
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 18, 2012 10:54 PM CST up reply actions
There are always viable interior linemen at the top of the 2nd, and usually viable RTs.
Certainly guys with better immediate prospects than Goff and McIntosh. And why in the world did they let Wade Smith get away without making him a substantial offer? In my view, they’re behind where they ought to be, after 3 years.
Especially when you factor in the possibility that you DO screw up with one of your attempts (Heads will roll in scouting!!!). At least they could’ve made a pick for an almost-certain high-quality interior lineman, when it was so obvious they needed a serious infusion of talent, for all my oft-voiced and overly optimistic hopes for the likes of Alleman and Ndukwe (barrel scrapings – smart/clever barrel scrapings, from Daddy-in-law – but just barrel scrapings). It was one thing to pick those two rejects off the pile, when they finally woke up to how bad they were up front, but to follow that failure up with a single OG pick in the 3rd in 2010 and a single OC pick in the 2nd in 2011 is half-measures on behalf of the position group. Sure, they went after Wiegs and Lilja, but to me it still verges on malfeasance.
It’s just too important to get the trenches right. If you want your skill players to duplicate their collegiate successes, you want to give them comparable help from their supporting cast. That’s why I believe a guy like Andrew Luck is going to find it much tougher sledding in the pros. He’ll likely be stepping into a decidedly worse situation than he faced as a colleegian.
For all the famous 1st round QBs and DBs there are, very few non-1st rounders are ever going to realize their up-side, without smart team-build before their arrival. I’d rather have more long-shots in while I’m setting the stage, and when I feel I’m pretty good (not necessarily DOMINANT, but at LEAST pretty good), if scattergun doesn’t turn up QB and RB, THEN it’s time to bend things outta shape a little for those guys. But you want to be able to afford it, so to speak.
would of ≠ would've
I've seen a lot of mocks
that say DeCastro, or even NT like Still or Poe, or Richardson.
by AnkenyChiefsFan on Feb 19, 2012 6:41 PM CST up reply actions
still reeling from Spoon and Sherrod?
KC Draft prediction: No OT taken in first round
by trentchiefsfan on Feb 18, 2012 8:20 PM CST up reply actions
That makes no sense
Why can’t DeCastro handle NTs?
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 11:01 AM CST up reply actions
But we're not facing 3-4 Teams every game
Most teams in the league run a 4-3.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 11:12 AM CST up reply actions
true but SD runs it & OAK may be switching to the 3-4 too. Draft to win your division
Plus the best D’s usually r 3-4’s. Not all but usually
And I'm not worried about Hudson handling them
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 11:24 AM CST up reply actions
The need to prosper against BOTH 3-4 and 4-3 argues for some elite players inside on your offense.
I wouldn’t scheme to win my division. I’d scheme to win the SuperBowl. Of course, Carl and Marty did that in the early years, and couldn’t get past the quarterbacks standing in their way, within the division.
would of ≠ would've
draft to win GAMES and the division will take care of itself
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
Except Konz plays guard in KC
Either DeCastro or Konz will be playing LG for the Chiefs, Konz does offer the versatility to slide over to center in the event of an injury.
I would really like to see Decastro, Konz, or Glenn in the 1st, depending on how things break.
Some thing Glenn wouldn’t be a fit, but he’s a great OG, who can ALMOST play OT at the next level. Maybe he CAN do a Michael Oher imitation at RT. I wouldn’t be picky about where in the middle Konz was lined up. Convention would put him at OG, with Hudson at OC, but I wouldn’t be stuck on that one idea.
would of ≠ would've
mobile mockery
1) Martin, OT : gotta have a safe OT pick, and the class isn’t deep
2) Martin, RB : most well-rounded back in the the draft
3) Allen, S: addresses a huge need on the D
4) Blake, C: OL depth
5) Chapman, NT : good value pick
6) Datko, OT: double down for depth, may start on IR or PS
7) Wylie, WR: sub 4.4 slot receiver
7) Reliford, TE: obligatory TE pick, good upside/blocker
Asumptions: Bowe, Carr, McClain are back
FAs: Soliai/Rogers, Grubbs, Dreessen
by stagdsp on Feb 18, 2012 11:56 AM CST via mobile reply actions
If we stay at 11 I would be very happy with this mock.
Martin and Allen would be immediate contributors. Martin adds to a deep backfield and Chapman, Datko, Reliford could all develop into great players.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 12:00 PM CST up reply actions
thanks
I find it hard to mock trades… seems arbitrary
by stagdsp on Feb 18, 2012 12:02 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
yeah
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
I only do it because, as usual, I hate where we are in the draft.
I don’t think Martin or Reiff are going to be as good as Adams and I don’t like the prospects available at 11 unless Dre or Claiborne slip.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 12:05 PM CST up reply actions
i think Martin will be better
But, Adams should be a starter as well, so I would be happy trading down and getting him.
I almost always hope for trades down
by stagdsp on Feb 18, 2012 12:10 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Martin wouldn't be a very safe OT pick
I don’t trust his ability to start day 1 at RT.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 12:09 PM CST up reply actions
he should be a starter day 1
Probably better at LT, but he could play either side.
Likely better than BRich, and upside to be an All Pro
by stagdsp on Feb 18, 2012 12:13 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
He will be a starter day 1, but it doesn't mean he should be
He’s a finesse tackle, I’ve never heard of one of those playing RT.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 1:10 PM CST up reply actions
NFL is changing.. more teams passing, better pass rushers spending more time at RT
Needing better and better athletes over there.
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 18, 2012 2:38 PM CST up reply actions
But he has slow feet
So that doesn’t help at all
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 4:58 PM CST up reply actions
I was talking about a finesse RT
Saints kind of actually have one as well, use their OTs to push rushers behind Brees while the middle 3 are a rock giving him plenty of space to move up
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 18, 2012 5:10 PM CST up reply actions
but we don't have those rocks in the middle
Or Drew Brees for that matter.
And again what use is being a finesse Tackle if you have slow feet?
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 5:21 PM CST up reply actions
Again I'm not directly talking about the prospect
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 18, 2012 5:23 PM CST up reply actions
Saying the idea of a mauler at RT is changing
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 18, 2012 5:23 PM CST up reply actions
Not necessarily
Bull Rushers still run rampant on the Right side in today’s NFL, and that’s still what is needed.
Shoot we got two strong guys in Jackson and Houston to prove that.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 5:33 PM CST up reply actions
With more teams passing, the best pass rusher lines up on the left side quite often
See Hali
Houston is developing his bull rush, but is still a finesse guy. Tjax still tries to use finesse moves as well
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 18, 2012 6:05 PM CST up reply actions
Hali always lines up on his right though
Houston is far from finesse, and TJax can’t bull rush a whole game. Not even Haloti Ngata can bull rush a whole game
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 6:25 PM CST up reply actions
What
Hali lines up on both edges depending on the match-up
wierd how we flop the Rush OLB and don’t the CB’s
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 18, 2012 7:29 PM CST up reply actions
Last year he mainly lined up at LT
He switched sides of course, but Houston/Studebaker sure as hell couldn’t take on the LT most games like Hali can and that’s why.
Houston is getting theres though.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 8:29 PM CST up reply actions
I agree with your take on bull rush versus today's entering OTs.
I think some of these 1st round OTs are picked because so many other prospects just don’t have quick enough feet, but you get these new generation OTs and they’re gettin’ driven in pass pro’ and they’re givin’ up ground in the scrum for rush yards.
Basically, it is as it’s ever been: Outstanding OT play calls for a very very rare kind of prospect that you either pick in the top 5 for by sucking, or you make a big trade for, but otherwise, you’re just making do with what’s available, and you don’t want to burn a 1st on ‘em, because you need help from somewhere else (lots of TE help, extra tackle sets, and misdirection), because your guy ain’t dominant.
Nothing against Tyron Smith or Matt Kalil, but unlike a Willie Roaf or a Jake Long, they’re top prospects only by comparison to all the rest in their class. To me, it’s not like the great ones come along every year. Sure, the Chiefs prob’ly can upgrade that RT spot thru the draft, but nearly as much in the 2nd or 3rd as in the 1st.
would of ≠ would've
Tyron Smith is looking fantastic in Dallas
Was their best OL last season per multiple reports and will probably start at LT next year, Kalil is also a damn good athlete in his own right.
Maybe not Jake Long, but D’Brickashaw Ferguson is a good comparison.
TBH outside of Adams I don’t see many OT prospects who can start day 1 at RT and be successful. Most seem to be LT types or projected year developmentals.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 11:19 PM CST up reply actions
Agree.
On Tyron and sense of the 2012 OT draft class. Tyron’s just the one guy from the 2011 draft, and Kalil looks like The Guy this year. Maybe neither one Jake Long (certainly their names are spelled differently), but maybe the only real 1st-round caliber bookends. Some of the bigger Gs, like Cordy Glenn look like better all-around options, for their potential to be that rare, STOUT OT who still gobbles up the outside pass rush. Guys whose worst scenario is they play inside, and you get your second shot at OT, without penalty, so to speak.
would of ≠ would've
But I also place Glenn in that developmental category
He’ll be a damn good guard at first though.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 2:56 PM CST up reply actions
I just think he'd be a decade-long pro bowler at G.
Prob’ly not even on Pioli’s radar, if he continues in the current mold.
would of ≠ would've
He's on Pioli's radar if we trade back
Athletic Big man that can move, it’d be Big Jon all over again. Only a much more talented, bigger version with upside to be a tackle due to those freakish arms.
Did you see my fanshot on Asamoah’s old teammate Jeff Allen? I think if we miss out on Glenn, he can be a guy we target in the 4th or 5th. I watched Devon Still vs Illinois tape recently and they did use him on pulls, and he’s played every position, mostly Right/Left tackle in his final year.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 11:56 PM CST up reply actions
Nope. In fact, I'm pretty much down to FanPosts and Mocks within 'em.
I’ll look for ‘Posts from guys I know, but I’m trying to manage my time better.
Anything you stick in those “main” threads, I’m likely to catch. A FanShot inside the comments really enriches the content. You be the guy that posts links in with the rest of the prattle from everybody.
Glenn’s one of the reasons I’d like to see a modest trade-down. Might’ve been YOU who shared the game film on Glenn @ LT. I can’t remember, now. Really liked what I saw from him, compared to Reiff, in another shared film by the same generous APer. Reiff looked like a guy who’d lack in the power dept, at least to start with.
would of ≠ would've
before I even look at the draft, I'm going to comment on the draft trade math....
Trades:
The Chiefs trade pick number 11 to Cincinatti for pick number 21 and a second round pick this year, they move up to select Trent Richardson.
1) There is at least a 450 pt difference between 11 (1250) and 21 (800). Throwing in Cincy’s 2nd rd (370) leaves them AT LEAST 80 short. That would mean that in order to get even close to value, Cincy has to throw in a 4th and 5th (or 2013 3rd and 4th…or combo of each: 2012 & 2013 4ths). Or they’d have to throw in a 3rd and KC would give them our 4th instead.
But swapping 1sts and getting only a 2nd in return is not a good value for Pioli.
2) Why move all the way back to 21 in one trade? Incremental trades is where it is at. Each team moving up should slightly overpay, netting more picks in the long run.
The Chiefs franchise and trade Carr to New England for pick 31 this season and a third round pick next season.
1) I suppose this trade is fine if you think Carr is only worth the 29th overall pick in the draft (31st [600 pts + 2013 3rd{=2012 4th} [45 pts] = 645 pts, or the 29th overall pick in the 2012 draft). Personally, I think Carr has more value than that.
2) NE should start the conversation with both of their late 1st rd picks (1280 pts [almost the 10th overall pick] because a late 1st is essentially a 2nd rd pick! Thought of properly, Carr should be able to fetch 2 early 2nd rd picks.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 12:00 PM CST reply actions
80 point difference? Oh no!
The trade has to be fortuitous to both sides and that means some discussion and dealing from both sides. Could they throw in maybe a future third? Sure, why not. But I got the meat and potatoes of the trade and moved on. I’m not going to spend 20 minutes making sure the trades come within 5 points of a trade value chart that is often ignored.
Carr is a solid young corner that excels in his role but can he do that when left on an island? Can he be the guy that shuts down half of the field and makes the QB not throw at him? I’m not sure. A first and third is almost as much as we got for Jared Allen and I would argue that Carr is nowhere near what Allen was worth.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 12:04 PM CST up reply actions
yeah, Carr wouldnt bring that much
And the point values are largely BS
by stagdsp on Feb 18, 2012 12:11 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
I am sure the trade chart is more appropriate in the later rounds
than in 1st round trades
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 18, 2012 12:15 PM CST up reply actions
I do think he would be worth a 1st to the Patriots and a few other teams
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 18, 2012 12:16 PM CST up reply actions
as do I
but getting the 31st overall (basically a 2nd rd) and next year’s 3rd (basically a 4th in this year’s) is not enough.
If you’d take a 2nd and 4th for Carr, by all means, go ahead. I wouldn’t.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 12:37 PM CST up reply actions
yeah, i know they do. But that wasn't Hake's trade scenario.
And I think there would be more teams willing to pay a bit more for him. Maybe not. This is all speculation on our part.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 1:50 PM CST up reply actions
Well, you first try to KEEP Carr.
But I do agree with you that whatever point system is used, the team trading-up should generally be expected to pay some sort of premium. That said, a team eager to trade down, might make the makeable deal, rather than be hidebound about receiving a premium. Sometimes there’s long-term profit in making the makeable deals, and not trying to bargain too sharply. Even at a “technical points loss,” if you can do some good with the extra 2nd- or 3rd-round pick. Just having AN extra pick gives you a LOT more BPA flexibility, so you’re more often the guy who gets the 3rd-round steal, when other teams lock themselves into a PON situation, by too-sharp dealings on other fronts, and too much chicken-counting off the number of eggs present.
would of ≠ would've
he would bring more than a 2nd and 4th
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 12:35 PM CST up reply actions
that's just ignorance.
sure, when the deal is made inside a cute little football vacuum, where there is absolutely no competition for the pick…
you don’t trade just for the heck of it. there has to be demand for a pick (someone really wanted).
As far as a 1st and 3rd, you’re being ignorant. It really isn’t a 1st and 3rd, it is essentially a 2nd and 4th. quite a big difference actually.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 12:35 PM CST up reply actions
rofl you can't just change the classification of a pick.
pick number 31 is a first round pick it isn’t basically a second. And you are arguing the trade value chart which has been shown to be an out dated standard that we as fans use. I am trading carr after franchising him and signing Routt. You expect the moon for a player that has had one good season and has potential. Not even one great season. Remember before this year he couldn’t get his head around and he couldn’t catch a damn thing. How much of that is Emmitt Thomas? How much is comfort in the system? A team has to think about more than just talent level when trading for a player. Carr will be in demand but not at a price you are suggesting. You are valuing him as being worth what? A top 15 pick in the first round? No way the Chiefs get that kind of value for him. You are expecting a mid 20’s 1st, 2nd, and a future 2nd i assume? This isn’t Madden and teams don’t overpay for no reason.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 12:57 PM CST up reply actions
it is basically a second. 20 pts/ 2 places from a second rd pick.
that pick does not have 1st rd value.
You are expecting a mid 20’s 1st, 2nd, and a future 2nd i assume?
Nope. If he is being traded to the Patriots, I expect 2 2nds or so (aka #27th & #31st overall picks). Again, Carr is worth more than the cumulative 29th overall pick value you give him.
There’s way better value out there for him. Even Detroit would probably offer more for Carr.
And I’ll be using your argument for everyone that says we should show Carr the money and overpay.
You expect the moon for a player that has had one good season and has potential. Not even one great season. Remember before this year he couldn’t get his head around and he couldn’t catch a damn thing
the fact is this: If Carr, as his body of work stands right now, was available in the draft, where would he go? The first round.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 1:09 PM CST up reply actions
Okay so just basic Homerism, got it.
If Brian Waters were in the draft last season with his body of work where would he go? 1st round and yet he wasn’t even able to get a trade. And 27th is now a second rounder too eh? That’s good to hear.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 1:34 PM CST up reply actions
well i have heard that Weedon is a 1st rd talent
so I suppose just because you have an AARP card doesn’t mean you can’t be worth a 1st?
How do you know he wasn’t even able to get a trade? How do you know they even tried? Oh hey, yeah, we’re going to cut this guy if we can’t get a trade for him. What do you say? 3rd rounder? huh?
Plus the huge gap in age. Carr is a decade younger than Waters.
I expect 2 2nds or so
Notice the two words “or so”.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 1:46 PM CST up reply actions
I know he wasn't able to get a trade because teams don't just cut players without trying to get something
And because he was a free agent for months until an injury caused new england to pick him up.
And okay for a closer comparison Antonio Cromartie was traded from San Diego to New York for a conditional 2nd or 3rd rounder based on playing time. And you expect Carr to fetch twice what Cromartie did if not more,
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 1:51 PM CST up reply actions
Cromartie is not as good as Carr
and you’re all over the place now…
And because he was a free agent for months until an injury caused new england to pick him up.
So why was he compared to Carr for?
You basically made the case for Waters not being seen as having any talent.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 2:01 PM CST up reply actions
if Carr hits FA, he won't be waiting for an injury on a team to get himself a contract
he’ll probably be getting #1CB money….
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 2:02 PM CST up reply actions
Wow the Cromartie comment... just wow.
Such blatant homerism. The two are very comparable and I compared him to Waters because you felt the need to put a veteran in a draft which is stupid. You can’t say “oh this veteran would go in the first round” Every starting veteran would likely go in the first round but that doesn’t mean they are worth a first rounder in a trade.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 2:38 PM CST up reply actions
25 year old CB vs. a 35 year old OG
BIG DIFFERENCE.
It isn’t homerism at all.
When you are trading draft picks for a player, your mindset in determining compensation should
1) is this player better now than what our board says will be there at our pick?
2) does this player project to be better in the future than what our board says will be there at our pick?
3) if this player was available as is (AGE + TALENT) would I take him with X pick?
Thus, throwing in a 25 year old player, or as you call him ‘a vet,’ does have bearing. Whereas, throwing in a washed up 35 year old has been, does not. Nobody would draft a mid-thirties offensive lineman….or any 30 year old player.
It isn’t an apples-to-apples comparison at all.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 4:08 PM CST up reply actions
A washed up 35 year old vet that made the pro bowl and the super bowl
Compared to a 25 year old corner that didn’t make the postseason or get any accolades other than from PFF.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 11:45 PM CST up reply actions
But don't your eyes tell you that Carr's pretty darn good?
And don’t you, Stevie_k, see the point that there’s a big difference between having a guy who’s as valuable as many guys who were picked in the 1st, and extracting a 1st-round pick for him in trade? Sure, take a 1st or a 1st-plus-anything in trade, if the guy wants to walk or wants to send the Mormon Tabernacle Choir on a sightseeing tour of the Moon on 10% of his salary. But if you’re even THINKING of making such a move, you’re already a motivated seller, and you aren’t going to get a 1st-round pick for him, unless Detroit gets all stupid after Gunther Cunningham stages a palace coup.
would of ≠ would've
i'm assuming that the sense of urgency to acquire Carr is greater than Pioli's urgency to trade him.
after all, if he is tagged, Bowe’s situation will already come to resolution, whether walk or stay. Carr could always sign long-term after getting tagged.
I feel I made my case for the process of evaluating Carr as a 1st. And I still believe some teams may.
Do you disagree with the process above (the three questions)?
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 19, 2012 4:09 PM CST up reply actions
Sure. It's logical.
But value is all in the eye of the individual. If you really want a trade for Carr, for instance, you then have to find somebody willing to give up the pick for him. I think Carr would need 4 years of flawless play under his belt for an outside team to be willing to throw a 1st-rounder at him. But you could be right. I definitely feel he’s worth MORE as the player he is, than a draft pick.
would of ≠ would've
pro bowl doesn't = all-pro
matt cassel went to the pro bowl.
Waters went on reputation.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 19, 2012 4:06 PM CST up reply actions
Cool
Keep arguing PFF stats and relying on a trading chart that has been shown to be a rough guide and not accurate. They have Flowers in their all AFC West team over Carr btw.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 4:11 PM CST up reply actions
oh goody.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 19, 2012 9:28 PM CST up reply actions
Carr
is 10th in the league in completion % against. 8th in the league in qb rating against. 2nd in catch % per coverage snaps. And his penis hasn’t fully populated one whole state.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 18, 2012 4:20 PM CST up reply actions
With all the hair-splitting in this thread, I've decided to revisit Roe-v-Wade
and the “Life begins at conception” question. When is a 1st-rounder really a 2nd-rounder and a crime?
would of ≠ would've
haha
objectively and strictly speaking, he is right. But subjectively, two picks away from the second basically is a second.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 19, 2012 4:11 PM CST up reply actions
And he did all of this with Flowers on the other side of him and in a system that he is very good in.
Can he be “the guy”? Can he handle the pressure to be great, to lock down his side of the field? You are basing him off of one great season and expecting superstar return. Brandon Marshall got 2 mid second round picks and you want to late firsts for Carr?
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 11:47 PM CST up reply actions
Flowers on the other side doesn't matter
Teams tried to test him with their number one as well, and didn’t get any farther then they would with Flowers.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 1:29 AM CST up reply actions
yes he did... for one season.
Most teams don’t give up two first round picks for a player with one good year even if they are only 25. But hey if Pioli can pulloff getting number 27 and 31 for Carr then by all means do it. I don’t think any team will give up 2 firsts this season for carr. A 1st this year and a 2nd next year maybe.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 1:32 AM CST up reply actions
Two seasons actually.
Last year and the year before. I still remember Carr shutting down Reggie Wayne, twice.
But yeah I see people only giving up a first for him.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 1:49 AM CST up reply actions
I suppose it depends on your definition of a great season
He had 25 pass deflections in 2010 compared to 2011 but only 1 pick compared to 4 in 2011. I remember being pretty frustrated with him the first half of 2010 and he turned it around nicely.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 2:21 AM CST up reply actions
Thomas has really helped him trust his abilities
He’s turning his head around and now he’s finally going up to get the ball.
Carr hasn’t reached his ceiling yet either, and I don’t know if I can say the same about Flowers.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 2:57 PM CST up reply actions
Done arguing Carr vs Flowers
I disagree with everything said and strongly disagree. But to get this straight the thinking around AP is that we must resign all our own players along with the other top 5 free agents and not invest in a QB at any point until you have 20 pro bowlers everywhere else.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 3:38 PM CST up reply actions
Okay Dokey man
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 4:40 PM CST up reply actions
Marshall is also a bipolar headcase....
Carr doesn’t have character issues.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 19, 2012 4:12 PM CST up reply actions
You're right
We should change his name to Tebow Carr. He is our savior and we cannot go on next year without him. Who cares about acquiring more currency in the form of draft picks or in making a run at a QB. Just continue to stay drafting in that 10-25 range every season.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 4:14 PM CST up reply actions
Wow really?
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 19, 2012 5:00 PM CST up reply actions
what the hell does any of that have to do with acquiring draft picks or making a run at a QB?
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 19, 2012 9:29 PM CST up reply actions
I traded Carr for draft picks remember.
And signed Routt who i consider a small downgrade from Carr. By resigning Carr we don’t trade anyone for more picks. Unless you want to franchise and trade Bowe but I don’t see a small downgrade from Bowe sitting in FA.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 10:00 PM CST up reply actions
what does that have to do with a QB?
and you can still accumulate picks by trading back.
For instance, if NE wanted a pretty shiny new RB or CB.
Oh boy, here I go….
according to the draft trade chart, our #11 is worth both of NE’s firsts.
Assuming NE would want to move up, or even Cincy with the 17th and 21st overall picks, we could trade back and end up with either 27 & 31 or 17th and 21st.
You keep Bowe, you keep Carr. And you can still draft your two offensive linemen in the 1st rd.
May have to give up a 2nd or 3rd or future pick with Cincy or maybe not. And sure, you don’t accumulate an extra 2nd this year or an extra 3rd next year, but…
If you value Carr as essentially a 2nd and a 4th anyway (2013 3rd), if you CAN KEEP HIM, he should be at least worth those two picks.
However, if you are wanting RG III—which I can understand—then I’d rather tag and trade Bowe. More value to other teams, less to ours. We have better WR depth than CB depth IMO—i’m sure others will vehemently disagree. I feel that picking up another all-around TE (or at least catching TE), coupled with BGE, those returning from injuries, a year of improvement for both Breaston and Baldwin….and a possible free agent addition—there is more WR depth in FA than quality CB depth—and the offense, with your shiny new QB will be much improved over the past few years.
So tag and trade bowe (i’ll let you decide his worth), and trade multiple 2013 picks to keep moving up in the 2012 draft. Get your QB, get your offensive linemen.
Sign your NT in free agency. Round out your depth in FA and the draft, and begin your dynasty.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 20, 2012 10:31 AM CST up reply actions
My 1st Routt-related com, since the signing, reported on NFLN.
Jonathan Hake is the guy who put the Routt signing out there, with an eye to trading Brandon Carr for draft pick(s). So, H/T to Hake.
In that discussion, Hake was talking about stockpiling draft picks for 2013.
Another consideration, here, is the large number of WRs in FA this offseason. Might be tough to get full value in trade for a WR. With the signing of Routt, though, the whole Carr-for-picks takes a step up. There’s also the possibility of a trade involving FLOWERS.
Depends on whether you see Routt as an inside leverage press corner who can take Carr’s place, or if you see him as an inside leverage press corner who can take FLOWERS’s place!
Or maybe they’re looking for that sum’m sum’m I’VE been wanting, which is a 3rd corner who allows the Chiefs to STAY in press against the 3-or-more wides. They tried it against NWE early, but they couldn’t/wouldn’t sustain it the whole game. Nice surprise to kick off the game, but something Brady and Co. could figure out and attack.
would of ≠ would've
The only problem i see with playing Carr, Flowers, and Routt
Is that i’m not sure any of them can play slot. I know that Routt is an outside man corner and most of the reports say he struggled in the nickel or zone corner roles. I would leave him on the outside and put Carr on the other big receiver or outside receiver and move flowers around in the slot and around the backfield. But that is just my idea of how the three would coexist. Any suggestions would be welcomed here.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 22, 2012 2:07 AM CST up reply actions
I think Flowers can
Flowers’ issue has always been dealing with Tall guys and well, slot guys aren’t usually tall. Plus his short area quickness is one of the best in the league. He has great tackling ability as well just in case they run at him.
I think he could play the Hybrid DB role similar to Woodson in GB.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 22, 2012 2:20 AM CST up reply actions
I could envision him doing well in that role
It would just kind of suck paying a player 10 million a year to play that role. But I suppose Flowers could still play outside in 2 receiver sets and we could bring Routt in on nickel sets and slide Flowers around.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 22, 2012 2:24 AM CST up reply actions
All of the above, and then some.
Don’t know if they end up keeping all three, but if they do, they’ll have lots of options.
The thing, to ME, about adding Routt, isn’t so much he can’t play slot because he’s not a zone guy, but that he CAN come up and press, so this means that they don’t NEED to play zone as much, against the extra wides. If they’re all pressin’ at the line, then Routt/Carr/Flowers can all jam the slot guy.
Maybe adding Routt gives them something better against the dreaded bunch formations. Offenses run those bunches, to get a guy off the line free. If you fight the bunch formation by just smackin’ all three guys at the line, then the purpose of the bunch is defeated. But it takes 3 (or more) DBs who can really come up to the line and be physical.
would of ≠ would've
Well the issue is that when he is asked to man up in zone i believe he struggles as well.
Most of the guys in the slot are very quick and they have two options of where they can go. If you are man on the outside you can kind of stay inside and force your guy to the sideline like Revis loves to do. I think Flowers is easily the most suited for the slot but he also has the least amount of speed of the three. As long as he is facing the smaller quick receivers and not the burners we should be fine.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 22, 2012 12:43 PM CST up reply actions
It would suck?
Woodson I’m sure gets paid fat too, and he makes that defense run. Well at least he did the year they won the SB anyways.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 22, 2012 7:18 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah i meant as a nickel role
But on further thought realized he would only be the nickel corner in the nickel package and would still play outside the other downs. I like the idea of all three assuming Carr is around the same price as Flowers.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 23, 2012 12:28 AM CST up reply actions
Nice post, I just disagree with a few things.
Im not a fan of mike adams at all I would love several other prospects at RT before going with mike adams. I love his size I just read way to many bad things about him that throws me off him or keeps me from growing into liking him.
One thing I kept thinking while reading your post was, What do we do at QB? Matt Cassell? Seeing you pick up all those picks I would rather take them picks and move up for RGIII or possibly luck. Build most our holes via Free Agency with the money we got like LG, RT, If we lose carr for draft picks to new england I would really hope they do get Routt before that happens, RT maybe Bell from buffalo? LG I have no clue really not sure we could pay nicks, we got the money but that is having the money now not looking ahead and I dont think that would be smart.
Well in my last post I traded for future picks and saved up to move up and get a QB and everyone was against it.
So instead of building a future at QB like a smart team would I decided to try and build up the team and let our horrible QB drag us down.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 2:40 PM CST up reply actions
I was against saving those picks for next years possible QB class
Not bundeling the picks to move up this year
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 18, 2012 3:40 PM CST up reply actions
alot of QB's coming out next year though right?
I like matt barkley, not a fan of landry jones but someone else probably will be, then there is the kid from arkansas tyler? someone else im missing also I think I would not be against trading some picks out of the picks you got in your scenario and trading them for picks next year to move up for that QB but I still dont want to see cassell on the field.
Looking at stanzi I really like his size I didnt know he was that big? Sure wish he would see the field.
The kids from Georgia and Tennessee
Are also considered highly.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 4:59 PM CST up reply actions
Murray and Bray
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 18, 2012 5:11 PM CST up reply actions
lots of possibles
rather than a QB in the Chiefs pocket in 2012
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 18, 2012 5:13 PM CST up reply actions
Sig is def changing to ''Tyler Bray QB 2013 Draftee'' if we do not land Luck/RGIII
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 18, 2012 5:14 PM CST up reply actions
Heh. Me, personally, I'd rather have a better OL in place before I go rich at QB.
I don’t know what they REALLY have in guys like Darryl Harris and Chris Mims, so they might be a factor that isn’t apparent to someone at my distance from the team. I think it’s possible that I like O’Callaghan better, if he comes back 100% healthy, with Asamoah now starting next to him, Hudson likely starting, and POSSIBLY a new guy starting at LG, and Lilja a quality swing player inside.
That’d be a totally revamped OL, with maybe more continuity than 3 new starters might otherwise indicate Hudson with a year as backup, in the system, with this group of guys, and O’Callaghan a returning starter. Really just the new (preferably 1st-round) interior line pick being much of a departure from norm. O’Call might have some limitations, but is more heady, consistent player, imo.
Anyhoo, they might take some real strides, with high probability instant upgrade inside, and sure, a 2nd or a 3rd on OT, but not really putting all their eggs in the Mike Adams basket, because you have a doubt, like the President at the beginning of The Fifth Element."
would of ≠ would've
Eh David Mims highlight of his career very well might just be the bad jokes on AP
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 19, 2012 6:17 AM CST up reply actions
Best Chief that never actually played a game
KC Draft prediction: No OT taken in first round
by trentchiefsfan on Feb 19, 2012 6:57 AM CST up reply actions
...thought that was Stanzi?
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 19, 2012 9:01 AM CST up reply actions
Heh. It's hard to say if Mims will grow into that XXX-long frame of his.
Just reminding myself that they have been developing some not-famous OLs.
would of ≠ would've
enjoy the sarcasm, but there was a great piece on nfl.com
about how players come out of nowhere. yes, it was a Linsanity-inspired piece.
Still interesting.
One of the reasons given was opportunity. Player X didn’t have anyone in his corner (associated with the team) arguing his case. While the team (scouts, coach, gm…) had fallen in love with one guy or another so player X never got his chance.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 19, 2012 9:56 PM CST up reply actions
So your saying Powe is going to be a beast of an NT for us?
Nice! haha
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 20, 2012 5:54 AM CST up reply actions
probably.
considering he wasn’t even the guy Pioli wanted in the 6th, he probably had no one to champion his case. lol
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 20, 2012 10:11 AM CST up reply actions
If I see them turn the corner on OL, I'll be on that (kind of) bandwagon, too.
THIS year, I’d really like their scouting to turn up an other-than-Orton FA, who will REALLY push Cassel for starting privileges. I’d really like Stanzi to make a serious bid. I have a pretty set opinion on Orton’s many strengths and key weaknesses, so while I was fine with his signing last season, and pleased with his performance against Green Bay in the Upset Game of 2011, I just feel like there are other unattached or nearly-unattached QBs around, that there’s somebody with more up-side than Orton out there, who could put real pressure on Cassel for the starting job. I saw enough futility from Cassel last season and last playoffs that I’m not at ALL prepared to hand him the starting job, uncontested.
I would really like to see all or most of a season of consistent OL play, before making my BIG bid for QB. I don’t want anything standing in the new guy’s way, when I roll out the red carpet and a slew of draft picks for the best QB (or QB prospect) around.
would of ≠ would've
I expect the Oline will be improved, and we will see a 1st round Olinemen if we do not trade up
So yeah, this year Oline, next year QB.
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 19, 2012 6:18 AM CST up reply actions
Mockery
FA: Carr, Bowe, McClain, Soliai, McKenzie
1. Trent Richardson, RB, Alabama
He makes the most sense and presents the greatest value. I don’t think the Chiefs will be drafting at 11/12 whether it be trade up or down (more likely down) I’m not sure but if we pick at 11/12 it HAS to be Richardson.
A tandem of Charles and Richardson would improve the entire offense. We would have breakaway potential every single play. There is no better value here.
2. Zerbie Sanders, OT, Florida State
When it comes to linemen Pioli has shown two trends from his time in NE up to his time in KC. He will
A) not draft an O lineman in the first and
B) put himself in a situation where he has to start a rookie on the O lineman
This is why Zerbie in the second along with FART Kareem McKenzie makes sense. We’d have solid depth and if McKenzie’s season in NY wasn’t a fluke and he actually has lost it then we can throw in Richardson or Sanders to finish out the season. Sanders is the best “RT only” in the draft.
3. Winston Guy Jr., S, Kentucky
One thing is for sure here. Whoever the pick is in the third he’s going to be a beast. Pioli is just shy of 100% hit on the third. Guy is a physical freak who played all over the field for Kentucky. A solid eventual replacement for Jon McGraw’s role
4. Josh Chapman, NT, Alabama
Best way to address a weakness? Overkill. Soliai/Powe/Chapman would be a pretty decent rotation at NT. Not to mention we would still have Gordon in the wings. The run defense would be very stout with a rotation like this
5. Adam Gettis, G/C, Iowa
He put together a solid resume while in Iowa, the only problem is that he is too light. Remind you of anyone? (Weigs) Gettis could come in and provide depth across the interior line while Richardson provides depth for the OT’s.
6. Brad Smelley, TE, Alabama
A good H-Back type player similar to Moeaki. Didn’t get much looks at Bama, but when he got his shot he did pretty well with it. He’s still got a ceiling to get to.
7. Jarrett Lee, QB, LSU
We gotta put a QB in here somewhere. Lee has a 60+ percent completion percentage against the toughest competition in football. Yeah he lost his starting job a few times but in the 7th you can take a chance.
There are no stupid questions just stupid people
by IPWT2009 on Feb 18, 2012 3:51 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Change your TE to Egnew from Mizzou and we are cooking
Egnew is close to breaking the reception record for Mizzou – from what Mizzou fans have told me
"Stay Classy Kansas City"
by Mas Cervezas on Feb 18, 2012 4:41 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
But he won't be there in the 6th
Smelley will be.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 5:00 PM CST up reply actions
you said fart

KC Draft prediction: No OT taken in first round
by trentchiefsfan on Feb 18, 2012 8:25 PM CST up reply actions
I did the live draft at mockingthedraft.com for the chiefs
Let me say it isn’t how I planned it but its actually pretty good
1) Luke Kuechly ILB BC- The only reason I drafted Kuechly is because DeCastro, Rieff, Martin, and Trent Richardson were gone and I could not trade down. Kuechly is a great ILB and will make the LB corps beastly
*I traded the second and third to get back into the 1st at 30th spot and picked up an extra 4th
1) Mike Adams OT Ohio State- This guy is a top 20 talent and I had to grab him because he would have gone a pick or two later
- Traded a 4th and 5th for Minnesotas 3rd
3) Jared Crick DE Nebraska Monster DE who can play several spots on the defensive line
4) Vick Ballard RB Mississippi State- This guy is so underrated he is a great pass catcher and runs great beteen the tackles
6) Evan Rodriguez TE Temple- I read that he plays like an Aarron Hernandez type TE and watched tape. I like the way he plays
7) B.J. Coleman QB Chattanoga- BIg player with a good arm, tranfered from Tennesee where he Tyler Bray was. This guy could be a steal i really think so.
7) Chris Galipo LB USC- Not my pick I had to leave but I told him to take OLB Darius Fleming ND but this guy had a pretty good career and could play special teams for a long time
4
Float like a butterfly, and sting like a bee!
I must admit I have been bashing your draft
it is the OMG post in the fanshots feel free to bash me back :)
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 18, 2012 10:56 PM CST up reply actions
I think it's good to have that Kareem McKenzie angle explored.
I’ve speculated on Demetrius Bell, too. Both lines of thought involve FA upgrade/competition, plus a 2ND round pick on OT, with the patience to let the kid develop for a year (or prove that you need to make ONE MORE, hopefully BETTER pick).
would of ≠ would've
Using your trade scenarios
Free Agents: Dwayne Bowe, Stanford Routt, Kareem McKenzie, Paul Soliai, BenJarvis Green-Ellis, Kyle Orton, Travis Daniels, Amon Gordon
Round 1(21) Dont’a Hightower ILB: Adds 3-4 experience and leadership qualities. Keeps Siler as good depth at ILB and Jovan Belcher is let go.
Round 1(31) Peter Konz G/C: Can play all 3 interior OL postions. Can sit behind Lilja a year. Pioli likes his linemen to sit for a year and learn. Konz will be no different.
Round 2(11) Zebrie Sanders RT. Same again as Konz. sits a year behind FA RT(ehheheheh fart) McKenzie from the Giants
Round 2(21) Orson Charles TE. Great TE. Good pass catcher, something Pope and O’Connell aren’t.
Round 3(12) George Iloka DB. Good DB with versatility. Played some CB because of Injury last season. Can replace Sabby.
Round 4(11) Brock Osweiler QB. Ambitous hoping he’d still be around here but I don’t think it’s too unrealistic. He’s very raw and will definitely need to sit a year, minimum. That might just be enough to last him until the fourth round.
Round 5(12) Josh Chapman NT: Falls due to injury but at this point he’s value and could become a good NT. Will battle it out with Powe for the backup NT spot.
Round 6 BPA
Round 7 BPA
Adds plenty of beef to the lines
KC Draft prediction: No OT taken in first round
by trentchiefsfan on Feb 18, 2012 10:27 PM CST reply actions
I would love this draft as well. I might say i prefer it to mine but I also questioned some of the rankings on these players so i didn't pick them.
I don’’t think Osweiler will be there when we pick in the 4th.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 18, 2012 11:50 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah ambitious by me on Osweiler
Just trying to find a way to include him in my mocks. He’s my favourite QB outside Luck and RG3. But others like Foles and Tannehill will go before him. just really raw with a ton of upside
KC Draft prediction: No OT taken in first round
by trentchiefsfan on Feb 18, 2012 11:57 PM CST up reply actions
none of those guys were available other than Konz
Float like a butterfly, and sting like a bee!
by IamtheGreatest on Feb 18, 2012 10:39 PM CST reply actions
Chapman isnt gonna fall that far
Float like a butterfly, and sting like a bee!
by IamtheGreatest on Feb 18, 2012 10:45 PM CST reply actions
He tore his ACL and his patellar Tendon, and got surgery done after the season
He could definitely be there.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 18, 2012 11:21 PM CST up reply actions
And my RG3 situation
Rams take Kalil. we trade this year’s first, next years first and Brandon Carr to the Vikes for number 3.
Free Agents: Dwayne Bowe, Stanford Routt, Kareem McKenzie, Paul Soliai, Law Firm, Travis Daniels, Amon Gordon. Joel Dreesen
Round 1(3) Robert Griffin III QB: no explanation required
Round 2 Kevin Zeitler OG: Good depth and will become a starter in a year in place of Lilja
Round 3 Mitchell Schwartz RT: Again can sit a year behind McKenzie
Round 4 Janzen Jackson S: Adds DB depth and gets rid of Sabby
Round 5 Emmanuel Acho ILB: Good prospect who’s brother is playing good in Arizona.
Round 6 BPA
Rpund 7 BPA
KC Draft prediction: No OT taken in first round
by trentchiefsfan on Feb 18, 2012 11:05 PM CST reply actions
1 WR Justin Blackmon (he fell to us, and Bowe is gone)
1 OT Mike Adams (from Bowe)
2 FQB Brandon Weeden
3 MLB Audie Cole
4 S Brandon Taylor
4 DE Jack Crawford (from Bowe)
5 TE Michael Egnew
5 TE Ledarius Green (from moving down in 2nd)
1 Justin Blackmon 1 Mike Adams (from Bowe) 2 Brandon Weeden 3 Audie Cole 4 Brandon Taylor 5 Michael Egnew 5 Ledarius Green (from moving down in 2nd) 6 Jack Crawford
by Chiefs_swagger on Feb 19, 2012 10:39 AM CST reply actions
Sorry if this sounds asinine but
What position is FQB?
Time to take back the AFC West
Go Chiefs
by King of the Cassel on Feb 22, 2012 1:01 AM CST up reply actions
Future Quarter Back?
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 22, 2012 5:48 AM CST up reply actions
You did it!
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 19, 2012 3:28 PM CST up reply actions
So because I am done arguing trades and signings here we go the perfect madden offseason
Resign Carr and Bowe
Sign McKenzie, Nicks, Soliai, Finley, and Marshawn Lynch
All needs addressed in free agency so trade this year and next years draft for Andrew Luck, QB, Stanford.
And we’re done
All of the people in here quoting stats about Carr from PFF and then turning around and drafting Decastro are eff'ing ridiculous.
You choose the stats you want from the site and ignore the ones you don’t care about. Who cares that they have had Lilja on their all AFC West team 2 years in a row and in the Pro Bowl last year. Or that they have Flowers over Carr in their all AFC West team this year.
PFF isn't all that reliable anyways
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 4:39 PM CST up reply actions
Then don't quote it at all.
Don’t pick and choose what to argue from what site. I love Carr as well and in a perfect world we would have locked him up last offseason when he could have been had for 5 million a season. But we didn’t and now he is going to want that 8 million a year contract. I don’t see any way he is in a Chiefs uniform next season but if he is then I will be wrong but happy.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 5:14 PM CST up reply actions
How do you not see it?
He deserves the same contract as Flowers, and we have the cap space to give it to him + interest. Hes got great chemistry with our 2ndary, and we’ve got a defensive HC.
And I don’t quote them usually, I’ve been one of their biggest detractors for a couple years now.
Although I do use other sites like Footballoutsiders, there metrics are a bit more trustworthy.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 5:18 PM CST up reply actions
Because of the cost of Berry and Flowers.
Three DB’s making 8 million a year is a good way to run out of cap space. Unless we manage to find a great QB making less that 5 million a season. I also think Carr is a proud person and that he feels like he may have been insulted by the Chiefs reluctance to sign him last offseason. He won’t give a home town discount now and there are teams that need him more than we do. Tampa is so barren at CB and so is Indy, Detroit, New England, and Green Bay.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 5:22 PM CST up reply actions
Its a passing league
How else are we supposed to stop the Brees/Bradys/Mannings/Rodgers of the league?
Especially with a QB under helm who is crap.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 5:31 PM CST up reply actions
The same way the Giants did.
They got a franchise QB and built an offense around him. And then they got pass rushers with solid but not great corners.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 5:51 PM CST up reply actions
But we don't have a franchise QB, you keep going on about getting one but I'm working with what we got
And since we don’t have the DL/pass rush(Hali-Houston is a good start) just yet, might as well keep the corners we got now.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 6:02 PM CST up reply actions
I keep going back to it because it is the way to win in the NFL
Cassel isn’t the answer.
Stanzi is an unknown.
Orton is gone and probably not the answer.
Why continue to build a team that will win 9 games and never win a championship?
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 6:10 PM CST up reply actions
Cassel is our QB, and unless we cut him before his bonus he'll be our starter going into next season
So working with what we got, keep your best talent together even if you overpay for a group.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 19, 2012 6:18 PM CST up reply actions
I agree, for the short term.
And I also tend to believe that QBs are easier to find if you give all the guys trying out a good situation to play in. Build a team Kurt Warner’d want to play on. I see Chicago and Detroit, especially, going at it upside-down and it’s a real struggle for them both to get everything together at the same time, and that QB they picked in the top 5 has already had a number of shoulder injuries. I don’t want to stick a QB in a bad situation and break him, especially if I’m sticking my neck out by trading up.
would of ≠ would've
The Chiefs are not far from being done
The Defense is 1-2 players from done
The offense is 1-2 players also
QB is the la dernière pièce du puzzle
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 19, 2012 9:43 PM CST up reply actions
Yes. And I'd be looking HARD at FA QBs this offseason.
I’d want to take one more pass at the OL before goin’ crazy for the pee-ess duh rayzistaunce. Nice accents there. I used to have the keystrokes for ’em on my Mac.
would of ≠ would've
I completely agree
but my question would be is our offense really that far away? does it really need much more than a QB?
For instance, Cassel has always been sacked a lot…even in NE. To me, it seems logical to conclude that his lines aren’t so much the problem as his head is.
This point was reaffirmed by watching Orton play behind the same offensive line and only getting sacked once in three games.
I do think the line needs some work, I’m just not sure that it needs as much as Cassel made it look like it needs.
And as you can perhaps tell, I do not want Cassel to be the starting QB. regardless of that bonus, if he is on the team he should be the backup.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 19, 2012 9:46 PM CST up reply actions
Orton did some things better.
Cassel will do more things better, if they top off the tank and give him (and his competitors) a full offseason to work with a pretty darn good group of WRs. I still don’t think much of his pocket awareness/vision. When he’s looking downfield, he’s not pocket aware and when he’s pocket aware, he’s not seeing down the field. Some of those things can iron themselves out, with just a TEENSY bit more time, on a consistent basis.
But I think that if I made it my purpose, that I could dredge up a FA QB out there, who’d do better than Cassel behind the line I’d be installing in 2012. And if I couldn’t, then I’d be trading-up in 2013.
would of ≠ would've
My point for RGIII
Let Cassel play in 2012 with RGIII on the bench.
Then flip them in role if called for in 2013.
Waiting just has nothing in waiting/training
we can always add that final piece in the 2013 FA/Draft with our QB already groomed
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 19, 2012 11:05 PM CST up reply actions
And if the team performs better this season and we get knocked out of the first round of the playoffs again
We will have to trade from 23 to 1 or 2 instead of 11 to 1 or 2.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 11:11 PM CST up reply actions
Almost no one thinks about that point when they say
‘’We will get a QB next year!’’
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 20, 2012 5:57 AM CST up reply actions
I think that's the logic behind securing the QB when you're in the cellar.
It’s what the worst teams always tend to do.
I just don’t like seeing Matt Stafford play for his first 2 or 4 years, behind an OL that gets him thrashed every week. You hope the shoulder injuries won’t shorten his career, and it’s that kind of hope that has me wanting a better-built team before I make the big move on QB.
That said, the more I reflect on the last couple years, the more I feel that what they’ve done so far hasn’t turned up a QB who’ll grow along with the team.
would of ≠ would've
The good part for me about trading up for RG III this season
Is that you would be able to have him sit behind Cassel and learn his first year while we solidify the lines and get everything ready. And if Cassel looks terrible halfway through the season but the line, defense, running game has kept us in it at 4-4 we could make the switch and have that veteran behind RG III this season and next season while he hones his skills and learns.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 22, 2012 2:09 AM CST up reply actions
Along with we actually have an LT unlike the Lions
RGIII can move around if the pocket breaks down
LG/RT are really not usual 11/12 picks.. Yes DeCastro looks like he could easily be a rock on our Oline.. but who is to say we can not get a great guard later ala Asamoah and have him learn under Lilja
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 22, 2012 5:50 AM CST up reply actions
I vehemently disagree. Steve_Chiefs spouts the same nonsense.
No WAY KC has the patience to let their 1st-round QB ride the pine for that first season. We can all give the idea lip service, but no freakin’ way. One poor pass from Cassel in the 1st quarter of Game 1 and we’ll ALL be screamin’ for the rookie.
RGIII!!! RGIII!!!!
So don’t kid yourself and don’t try to kid me with that “…have him sit” bullshit. It’s just bullshit.
would of ≠ would've
But Pioli has shown that he doesn't care what the city of KC thinks
KC was screaming for Stanzi and the front office and coaching staff didn’t budge. That could have been haley being a prick but I also believe that Pioli believes in making a rookie earn it and making sure they are ready to play. Brady sat behind a veteran until a veteran forced him into playing.
I wouldn’t be screaming for RG III until maybe 1/3 of the way through the season if Cassel is really struggling. Mostly because I don’t believe RG III is ready to be an NFL QB right now. I think he will need a season or two to mature and learn the NFL and adjust to the speed of the game.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 22, 2012 12:46 PM CST up reply actions
Maybe no KC fans
But the organization is a different story.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 22, 2012 7:19 PM CST up reply actions
What if we make it to the super bowl?
The last seed giants and Packers did right?
And didn’t the Falcons just trade into the top 10 from like 25 or so?
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 20, 2012 11:54 AM CST up reply actions
Did they? That looks like an OL pick, to me.
Might be LUCKY to land Glenn without trading down!
Heh. I think their need is at OT, isn’t it?
would of ≠ would've
Actually it is IIRC
Sam Baker is just awful.
They need a lot of help in a lot of areas, I’m hoping Pioli learned from their failures in the Giants Playoff game where they couldn’t convert on 4th down.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 21, 2012 6:30 PM CST up reply actions
They were already running a lot of tackle-eligible b4 2011,
and decided to attack the problem by upgrading the 2nd member of the pair of receivers in the pattern.
would of ≠ would've
We've had this conversation, before, Steve_Chiefs.
I compared it, then, as I do, now, to those times when Congress spends money, with the understanding that it’s a one-shot deal. Everyone agrees. And yet somehow the new program never dies a natural death. Same with promises to let the rookie carry a clipboard for a year. Fanbase would go ape-shit the first time Cassel threw an incompletion.
RGIII! RGIII! RGIII!
Heh. Depending on what headway they can make in FA on OL, and so forth, they might not be all that far away from making such a drastic move, and if RGIII’s the next Elway, well, then, go on ahead. But keep in mind that Elway reached the SB in SPITE of his OL and LOST the SB BECAUSE of his OL. And by the time he won it all, he was slow and weak-armed. Some might argue that the biceps thing got him to throw with more touch on the intermediate routes, rather than just seeing it, thinking it, and BOOM! the ball’s there, back in Rod Smith in the hands of stone part of his career.
Me, I want to see the OL more dominant as a prerequisite for consistent QB success. It’s not that I’m afraid to go big for QB, but I want smarter, more complete team-build, beforehand. There’s always a chance a DECENT QB can look like or develop into an All Pro, on a complete team, and if you’re smart about your system, when it comes to long-haul operations (and I think Pioli is), you can go high for Barkley, or whoever, or, with your complete team in place, you spend the same kinds of picks (maybe less?) to pry a Franchise-Tagged QB loose.
But they’re very, very close to making it work with an elite QB prospect. So I respect those who’re talkin’ RGIII, right now, especially after what Cam Newton did last year. Elite mobility and a big arm and a big brain. I value QBs with wheels more for what it means for the passing game, and how it forces defenses to respect the running threat whenever he drops back. I love when a mobile QB can stick those LBs in no man’s land, in contrast to a Kyle Orton, whom nobody’s going to fear will pull it down and skip out of bounds past the 1st-down marker. Saw this in Trent Green, whose window behind the LBs and in front of the Ss was very small, because they didn’t have to worry about him breaking away with his feet.
would of ≠ would've
So why didn't any of those teams go after Routt?
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 19, 2012 5:42 PM CST up reply actions
Maybe Routt doesn't want to play there.
Maybe they are on his list of visits.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 5:51 PM CST up reply actions
It is entirely possible that all of those teams have contacted Routt
And that Routt has intentions of doing his due diligence about what system fits best and where he would most like to play. He isn’t in a rush considering he has a month of being the best corner available.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 5:53 PM CST up reply actions
or maybe Lilja is going to be 32 this season?
If Lilja is as great as you’re making him out to be, he would have been blocking for Peyton Manning the past couple of years, not Matt Cassel.
And I’m not saying Lilja is bad, I’m just saying…
And many people on here who like DeCastro see 10+ years out of him at an elite level.
So enlighten us, why would we choose a 32 year old LG with maybe a year or two or three left an an okay level over a fresh out of college LG with elite potential. what a stumper.
And why would the same people be in favor of keeping a 25 year old Carr?
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 19, 2012 9:52 PM CST up reply actions
Well Lilja is 30 right now and will be 31 for starters.
Also Guards have a long NFL career lifespan so he could easily have 5 more seasons at an “okay level” which means finishing as one of the top 2 guards in the division by your website. Decastro could and most likely will have 10 great seasons and that matters jack shit if we have Cassel behind him and Richardson at RT. Drafting a guard at pick 11 when you have a bottom 10 QB in the league is ludicrous.
And you want to keep a 25 year old Carr? Hey me too. But I also want to win a championship which means getting a franchise QB. I’m just pointing out that PFF says Lilja is a very good guard and graded out very well. Carr did as well but they still chose Flowers on their all division team. In an ideal world we would keep both but in an ideal world we also wouldn’t have Cassel.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 10:06 PM CST up reply actions
i'm sorry, i don't have a website.
And has been said Ad Nauseam, if richardson is so bad, it should be really easy to upgrade his position.
I agree on Cassel, but this mock doesn’t even mention a QB until the 7th round, so how is that upgrading on Cassel? As far as we know Stanzi will be an upgrade over Cassel.
Re-signing Orton, taking a shot on Jason Campbell or trading up for RG III are a few of the options which should be greatly considered, but that doesn’t have much influence on also getting an offensive lineman.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 20, 2012 10:51 AM CST up reply actions
Yeah. My sentiments are still to get OL in the draft, and NOT finesse guys, but SPECIMENS.
And to keep the team on a significant uphill climb, I can’t quite see my way clear to a huge trade-up for QB, just yet.
I think a more likely upgrade at QB, right away, is to be found in the likes of Campbell or some other FA. I hate to say “Patriot Way,” but I’m thinking that going after Bledsoe, when they were still team-building, was good, common sense, and if they hadn’t struck gold in Brady, their next logical step would be drafting QB in the 1st.
Be great if Stanzi grew into something special.
Agree that real upgrade at RT is easier said than done. This is why I also mention Demetrius Bell, and I’m skeptical about those top 4 or 5 OT prospects in the draft really solving much, at least not right away, and maybe being LT-only types, to boot. That’s why I want to address RT in the draft, but in FA and the 2nd round. Let Atlanta grab one of those 1st-round OTs, and hope for instant upgrade at PON.
would of ≠ would've
I think that Adams is the only one of the first round tackles who really projects well on the right side
He’s more the “physical specimen type” as you say, and strong enough to hold up against bull rushes, the other three really are more finesse LT prospects. Massie later on also looks to be a good option if you could sit him for a season to learn. Of course the zone blocking scheme changes what we might go for a bit.
I do think that this year has pretty solid depth at o-line especially on the interior. I think it’s a great year for the Chiefs to trade down and stockpile mid round picks to build the line.
Yeah it's a weird tackle class this year, all of the top 5 have some major flaws in their game.
Kalil is real small (weight wise) and needs to grow into the position to be successful at the NFL level
Martin, Sanders, and to a lesser extent Reiff project more as finesse left tackles and are suspect against the bull rush
Adams has mental lapses but when he is on he is on. Has very high upside. I’m pretty mixed on him as well, but in a way it’s almost reassuring that his short comings are mental and not due limited physical abilities, then again if he doesn’t get those mental issues straightened out all his physical traits are for naught… like I said very mixed.
The other option would be a double down with Massie at the end of the 2nd or early 3rd and Datko late, all about weighing the options I suppose.
Totally agree. Then I start wondering about other teams thinking the same way, and worrying
about just who’ll be left in those spots we assume Massie and Datko will be selected by us. That’s part of my strong bias for going OL those 1st two picks, with an elite G/C in the 1st and somebody to put B-Rich on notice at RT with the very next pick. Needing/wanting upgrade, I’d reach for Cordy Glenn with that 1st pick w/ or w/o trade-down. Wouldn’t PLAN for him to be my starting RT, but I’d hate to enter the draft feelin’ good about 5 or 6 linemen, and it bein’ down to Victor-Riley the 7th guy, by the time I got to spend that 2nd-rounder.
would of ≠ would've
Actually the more I read up on Massie the more I like him
Seems like he would be a really good fit for us and could be a very good player. I wouldn’t mind reaching on him a little bit in the second, as I actually like him a good bit more than Sanders at this point. Plus we should have the inside scoop on him from Dex, Powe, and Lewis.
If you haven’t read it all ready Draftek has a scouting report up on him, that is pretty encouraging:
http://www.drafttek.com/2012-NFL-Draft-Prospect-Profiles/Scouting-Report-Bobbie-Massie.asp
without trades, i would love to see a draft like this
1. Johnathan Martin, OT, Stanford
2. Vontaze Burfict, ILB, Arizona State
3. Kendall Reyes, DE, UConn
4. Nick Jean-Baptiste, NT, Baylor
5. Joe Long, OT, Wayne St
6. Chris Rainey, RB/WR, Florida
7. Janzen Jackson, S, McNeese St
7. Jeff Demps, RB, Florida
Overall we are getting two offensive linemen, two defensive linemen, one linebacker, one d-back, and two offensive weapons. Pretty good draft if you ask me.
Let me defend my picks. First off, RT is our biggest hole. It is stopping a lot of what we want to do offensively. I do think that DeCastro might be the better prospect, but Martin is not a stretch. I think with Rodney Hudson in there at center, Lilja will look better. In the 2nd round, Burfict might just fall to us. I know a lot of people aren’t big on him, but I feel like he has the potential to be a major force for us on defense. Another option at 2 would be Hightower. In the 3rd round I have Kendall Reyes, a defensive end from UConn. I think that this is the guy who will replace Dorsey as our other DE. I know that doesn’t seem like much of a position of need, but we have to get someone on that side to allow Hali to do his job better. In the 4th, we get the best NT that will probably be available in Nick Jean-Baptiste. Dude is big and can plug the hole. I don’t think Ta’amu or Chapman will be there in the 4th, otherwise it would’ve been one of them. In the 5th round is a sleeper pick in Joe Long. He is an OT out of Wayne State and little brother to Jake Long. I don’t actually know much about him other than he is versatile enough to move inside so he could provide quality depth across the line. The 5th would also be a spot where we could try to snag a QB to compete. Russell Wilson is my favorite here as I feel like he will be overlooked due to his height, and Brandon Weeden might fall this far due to his age. Both would be a good pickup. 6th we get our very own Percy Harvin. I know that Rainey seems like too much of a McCluster clone to some of you, but I think that Rainey will be even better than Dex. I really think that he has the potential to be a special player and he could be a good offensive weapon for Daboll to attempt to utilize. In our first pick of the 7th round we get Janzen Jackson, a safety who is a serious talent in the later rounds due to off the field problems. He was a five star recruit coming out of HS and went to Tenn. I think he could add some quality depth and push Lewis for a starting role in a few years. Last pick is Jeff Demps. He is just nasty fast and so I want him. Another thought here would be Jacory Harris, the quarterback from Miami. He could be a good project QB.
by Brett Chamberlain on Feb 19, 2012 6:15 PM CST reply actions
I have a minor issue with Burfict
The Chiefs Defense is called by Belcher if memory serves, Burfict could not even learn his own job if reports are correct. How can Burfict call our defense which is somewhat complex if he can’t even learn his own role?
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 19, 2012 6:44 PM CST up reply actions
I thought DJ did
could be wrong.
"The greater the struggle, the more glorious the triumph"
Eric Berry counted to infinity -- twice.
Twitter: @Mr_Hoosier
Belcher calls the plays. He has the green sticker on the back of his helmet.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 8:01 PM CST up reply actions
Who calls them when he's taken out during sub-packages
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 20, 2012 11:55 AM CST up reply actions
Could be brought in from the sidelines
Although you do see DJ talking a lot when the camera is on him
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 20, 2012 3:19 PM CST up reply actions
Could be possible that DJ has a mic in his helmet as well.
I haven’t seen him with a green sticker on his helmet but I know Belcher has one.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 21, 2012 2:34 AM CST up reply actions
They both couldn't be on the field with mics
DJ doesn’t switch helmets so if Belcher gets the calls, DJ doesn’t just magically start getting them
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 21, 2012 5:40 AM CST up reply actions
Hmm i'm not sure then.
Maybe McGraw has one when he comes in for Belcher?
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 21, 2012 12:44 PM CST up reply actions
This image has the green sticker on DJs helmet

I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 21, 2012 1:53 PM CST up reply actions
nice, good catch.
It’s awesome that DJ has taken on that role. Kind of amazing how much he has grown and matured in 3 seasons.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 21, 2012 2:04 PM CST up reply actions
I never really paid attention to who had the sticker
I do remember seeing him talking a lot on the field, assumed it was relaying the play.. either from Belcher telling the play and DJ lining everyone up, the play coming from the sideline once Belcher leaves and DJ getting people in place, or DJ just getting the call himself
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 21, 2012 2:11 PM CST up reply actions
I kind of figured he was just a vocal player
He seems the type that would enjoy jawing on the field. But i’m glad he calls the plays and gets everyone in the front 7 in place. I do believe there is still normally a safety that makes adjustments for the secondary at the line as well.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 21, 2012 2:13 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah Berry did that his rookie season
Not sure I really recall any DB talking much preplay last year
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 21, 2012 2:15 PM CST up reply actions
Don't think there is anyway we take both Rainey and Demps
First that would give us 3 undersized speedy scat back type players, and we can’t even utilize the 1 we already have correctly. Second Demps has already said he is going to put football on the back burner and concentrate on the Olympics in track.
Also you don’t have us taking a guard at any point in this draft. I agree that Lilja will be serviceable with a larger center but he is also getting older and with his small size probably has only a few seasons left in the tank at best. I think it is almost certain we see another reasonably high pick spent on an interior lineman who will sit and learn for a season ala Asamoah and Hudson.
I thought about that
Then I thought, you can never have enough offensive weapons. Look at New Orleans. If Daboll is worth anything, he could make it work with these guys.
by Brett Chamberlain on Feb 19, 2012 8:36 PM CST up reply actions
No thanks on the horrible play of Burfict
Don’t think Reyes will ever be a 2 gap 5 tech
Joe Long that early?
Rainey/Demps.. yay two more small guys!
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 20, 2012 5:59 AM CST up reply actions
?
why do you think reyes won’t be able to play that position? he is projected as a 3-4 DE or a 4-3 DT. He is 6-4, 300 lbs. he is athletic as hell (there is a youtube video of him doing backflips). what makes you think he can’t play that tech? he is more suited to the role than dorsey.
joe long is projected by what i read to be a 5th rounder. that may not be true.
i know that rainey and demps are small, i was just looking for playmakers late in the draft.
can you give some examples of burfict’s horrible play? i’m not saying that you are wrong, just that people say that without having seen him in game once. in burfict, i see top 15 talent from a guy who needs some discipline and coaching (i actually think haley would’ve been the perfect coach for him).
by Brett Chamberlain on Feb 20, 2012 8:24 AM CST up reply actions
He is much more of a finesse guy from everything I have seen/read
That’s why I said a 2 gap 5 tech, in a 1 gap system he could be a perfect fit.. I would rather stick with Bailey and another late round guy.
Uh watch any game with Burfict? constantly out of position, bites on most play action fakes, can not take/shed blocks, no pass rushing moves and always relies on overpowering blockers, horrid in pass coverage, can not keep a level head… People got stuck on a few highlight hits/potential.. not going there until 3rd or later
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 20, 2012 8:28 AM CST up reply actions
If you have a system of D where you WANT a downhill LB, he could be a really good fit.
would of ≠ would've
That is based on what?
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 22, 2012 5:53 AM CST up reply actions
Just a general observation (conjecture?).
The ‘85 Bears did OK with great DL and great CB play. Marshall couldn’t cover a thimble with a hankie.
would of ≠ would've
Different time back then
He is not even great getting off blocks.. something you want from a downhill backer
Hell almost everyone complains when Belcher is in coverage.. going to take a step down even in that department and be fine with it?
Didn’t know if you saw some of his tape
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 22, 2012 5:21 PM CST up reply actions
I never once suggested KC would want him.
I’m happy with a pretty wide range of athletes at SILB, if their head’s on straight. Burfict is the anti-that. I wouldn’t draft him.
would of ≠ would've
Well we do ask the SILB in our system to be a downhill player quite often
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 22, 2012 6:53 PM CST up reply actions
It's hard not to really
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 24, 2012 5:44 AM CST up reply actions
He can learn to get off blocks, I mean the coaching at ASU sucks
And his coverage can be better then Belchers, I’ve seen it before.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 22, 2012 7:20 PM CST up reply actions
He is taken off the field for a ton of packages like Belcher as well
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 23, 2012 5:30 AM CST up reply actions
I remember seeing him in coverage and doing well
Maybe not so much last year, but the ability is there if we can find a way to tap into it.
I’d rather draft him in the 3rd though.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 23, 2012 11:18 PM CST up reply actions
Depends who else is there in the 3rd haha
That is the earliest I would even look at Burfict though
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 24, 2012 5:45 AM CST up reply actions
I don't understand the logic of this mock
we are trading Carr for a 2012 4th round draft pick (2013 3rd)??
What sense does that make?
So we trade back from 11th to 21st, picking up another 2nd. Okay.
We trade Carr, get a 31st overall and take a G/C.
Then at the top of the 2nd, we select a CB? In essence, you’re trading Brandon Carr for Stephon Gilmore and a 4th rd pick? No thanks. I’ll take the known talent any day. Only way you trade Carr is if he gets tagged and refuses to sign/sign a ‘rational’ contract.
Trading Carr for a pick to then use a high pick to draft a replacement, especially a replacement who might not even be the #2 CB (reference to signing Routt), is not gaining anything worth while.
If you want to move up to 31 to draft Konz, why not just use the 2nd 2nd rd pick? Or a 2013 pick if you’re hell-bent on selling out drafts to acquire guys?
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
I don't follow exactly
But I would be fully aboard Tagging and trading Carr to New England or Cincy for a 1st round pick in 2012
I then would take the two 1st ’s in my posession and trading them to St. Louis or Minnesota for our Future QB. Might have to throw in a little more but …..
QB > Carr IMO
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 19, 2012 9:49 PM CST up reply actions
Well, when you put it THAT way, yeah.
I’m just having a hard time seeing NWE or Cincy doing that. You think they’d seriously make such an offer, to jump-start their secondary?
would of ≠ would've
A proven CB over a drafted CB
Wouldn’t you and both have multiple 1st round picks this season.
We ain’t stealin candy from Children
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 19, 2012 11:09 PM CST up reply actions
The Routt signing REALLY opens up things along the lines of your thought process.
If they think they’re close, and, in NWE’s case, don’t believe their young guys will grow into their jobs, it looks a lot more likely, since a SB appearance in NWE’s case, and a promising season, in Cincy’s case, argues for directly fixing the issue.
At any rate, KC opened the door to such things, with Stanford Routt’s signing. This may indicate that Pioli’s also thinking the same way. It could also indicate that KC, itself, is patching a perceived hole in FA, unhappy with the #3 spot in the secondary. This is definitely a league where being 3-deep in quality corners, especially physical corners, can change the whole landscape of O and D. And you can still have 2 solid guys, even when somebody gets hurt, rather than being plunged deep into Zone-Only territory.
would of ≠ would've
What the fuck are you even talking about?
When you examine a trade you don’t look at the players drafted with those picks. We traded Carr for a first round pick and a 3rd rounder next season. If you don’t like the players I chose then that is fine but the trade is a good trade for both sides.
Only way you trade Carr is if he gets tagged and refuses to sign/sign a ‘rational’ contract.
Thank you captain obvious. That is the outcome i see happening even though i hope it doesn’t. And rather than being hung out to dry by his refusal to sign I thought it would be a good idea to bring in a quality number two corner and some solid depth at a premiere position.
I select Konz because he is versatile and can start at guard or center while we figure out where he and Hudson fit best together.
I select Adams to solidify the weakest part of our team.
I drafted a corner because I felt he was good value and because he and Routt could both man up big receivers or tight ends. I also feel that Gilmore can be used as the third safety in our nickel package.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 10:12 PM CST up reply actions
I'm not talking about the picks
i’m talking about the irrationality of trading Carr for a #3 CB (behind Routt).
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 20, 2012 10:43 AM CST up reply actions
You're probably the same person who hated the Jared Allen trade for the first two seasons
“What all we got was some shitty LT, a safety, and a crappy backup running back. This trade sucks” When in actuality the return in picks we got for him was so lopsided in our favor.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 19, 2012 10:14 PM CST up reply actions
Jared Allen is a completely different case
he was one DUI from a year + suspension.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 20, 2012 10:45 AM CST up reply actions
Here's the latest for your spears to be thrown at
Round Pick Selection School Height Weight Position Value/Reach
1 12 Mike Adams Ohio State 6’6" 320 ROT Reach -3
2 43 Lamar Miller Miami (FL) 5’11" 212 RBF Value +8
3 76 Brandon Boykin Georgia 5’10" 183 CB Reach -2
4 106 Kheeston Randall Texas 6’5" 298 DE34 Value +22
5 139 Brock Osweiler Arizona State 6’8" 242 QB Value +23
6 170 Kevin Koger Michigan 6’4" 256 TE Value +10
7 203 Tysyn Hartman Kansas State 6’2" 205 FS Reach -2
getusome sucka!
I could live with that..
Not sure I would go Boykin/Randall/Koger/Hartman though
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 20, 2012 8:22 AM CST up reply actions
Mike and Mike did their "2-a-days" on the Chiefs today
And they both said something that will make ups pretty happy. “The Chiefs need to upgrade the interior of their offensive line.” They didn’t specifically mention DeCastro. They did mention the possibility of grabbing Peyton Manning, and also possibly upgrading G in FA, with either Grubbs or Nicks. They mentioned needs like NT and ILB, mentioning that Mel Kiper had mocked Luke Kuechly to us in the 1st (not a chance, IMHO). I think we’re far more likely to reach for a NT than for an ILB, though I think it is more likely that we go O-line this year.
by AnkenyChiefsFan on Feb 20, 2012 12:18 PM CST reply actions
we should not be going NT early.
we should be inking Soliai IMO.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
by chief Stevie_k on Feb 20, 2012 3:07 PM CST up reply actions
I agree...
Still think we should get RB, NT, and G in Free Agency, and maybe QB if we can get a HEALTHY Manning or even Orton…and then go OT in the first round, by trading down, getting an extra pick and getting Adams or Sanders.
by AnkenyChiefsFan on Feb 20, 2012 3:33 PM CST up reply actions
i just haven't caught Adams fever
but otherwise I agree.
BGE/Bush/Tolbert, Solaia/Rogers, Nicks/Grubbs, Carlson/Chandler, Landry/Branch. We should at least look on adding a significant piece or two or three.
"At one point in your life you either have the thing you want or the reasons why you don't "
Walterfootball.com has a new 2013 Mock Draft
11. Kansas City Chiefs: D.J. Fluker, OT, Alabama
2012 NFL Mock Draft selection: Ryan Tannehill, QB
Kansas City lands a long-term starter at right tackle. Barry Richardson was exploited terribly in 2011.
Fluker (6-6, 335) has been an excellent tackle for Alabama. He is a nasty run blocker and quality pass protector. There is no reason to think that Fluker won’t have another dominant season in 2012 to prove himself worthy of being a pick in the top half of the first round.
Fluker is a beast, I’m so down.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
I would rather have Jones but yeah Fluker is looking like a great prospect
The 13 class could be very stacked for OTs
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 20, 2012 5:58 PM CST up reply actions
Jones at 11? no thanks
He’s no DeCastro.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 20, 2012 6:02 PM CST up reply actions
Barrett Jones?
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 21, 2012 5:42 AM CST up reply actions
Si
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 22, 2012 1:25 AM CST up reply actions
Well yeah he can play RT/LG.. not sure why you are comparing him to DeCastro
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 22, 2012 5:54 AM CST up reply actions
I see him as a Guard
And they’re moving him to Center this year.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 22, 2012 6:04 AM CST up reply actions
I thought he was an interior guy at the next level but the more I watched
Could make an excellent RT IMO
Who is taking over LT?
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 22, 2012 6:17 AM CST up reply actions
Cyrus Kouandjio
- Ranked OT of 2011, was on his way to starting at LT till he got hurt and was put on IR.
Starting as a Freshman at Bama is unheard of especially with how stacked that OL is(All draftable, at least 3 1st round picks from last year’s line alone) so Cyrus most likely will be a Top 5 pick if he stays healthy.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 22, 2012 6:31 AM CST up reply actions
Ah
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 22, 2012 6:48 AM CST up reply actions
I could've sworn we took
Tyler Bray in 2013?
Time to take back the AFC West
Go Chiefs
by King of the Cassel on Feb 22, 2012 1:09 AM CST up reply actions
So you already saw the 2012 season, and 2013 draft? haha
Guessing if we took Bray.. we didn’t do so well
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 22, 2012 5:54 AM CST up reply actions
I'm more concerned about Ryan Tannehill in the first.
I couldn’t think of a worse pick at 11
KC Draft prediction: No OT taken in first round
by trentchiefsfan on Feb 21, 2012 3:23 AM CST up reply actions
I hate the hidden assumption that they will epic fail on getting upgrade for B-Rich in 2012.
And here I’m spending most of my thinking on how to at least get somebody likely to do that.
would of ≠ would've
Combine datasheet
Here’s a spreadsheet for the combine…not sure if this is viewable, will someone let me know? Not sure how I’m supposed to share without allowing changes.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Alwz_yLmGQM8dFVlcDVkZTFZeE5GaDI4b0hvRVZkQ2c#gid=0
New Share link
by Kane on Feb 20, 2012 10:31 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Nice
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 21, 2012 5:44 AM CST up reply actions
New Post-Routt Mock
Sign: Bowe, Daniels, McClain, Stanford Routt DB, Anthony Collins RT, Braylon Edwards WR. Franchise Carr – Trade him for Patriots 31st pick.
12) David DeCastro OG Stanford
31) Dwayne Allen TE Clemson
2) Alameda Ta’amu NT Washington
3) George Iloka DB Boise State
4) Bernard Pierce RB Temple
5) Akiem Hicks DE/DT Canada
6) Sammy Brown DE/OLB Houston
7A) Austin Davis QB Southern Miss.
7B) James Carmon OT Mississippi St.
BOOM!
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
This to me is a realistic and very good mock.
I love Collins as a RT for us and Edwards could be a potential sleeper FA. Allen and Decastro would certainly help solidify our offense with Ta’amu and Iloka being very good defensive pieces.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 21, 2012 2:36 AM CST up reply actions
Thoughts on the other prospects
Dwayne Allen is a high Intangible player from what I’ve read football is his life and Da’quan Bowers said Allen wanted to go up against him in practice to work on his blocking. He’s already a good Blocker, and has great pass catching skill set to pair with good athleticism. Our Dbl TE sets would be killer.
Pierce reminds me a bit of Adrian Peterson, not as good of course but some similarities. Good size and compliment for JC/Dex.
Hicks was a former LSU recruit before violations pushed him out of the country, has great size(6-4/324) athletic talent and long arms(35.5 I think) Lots of upside just needs coaching up since he was in Canada, good developmental guy if/when we lose Dorsey or Tyson since he’s owed like 14 million in 2013 from what I’ve heard.
Brown is one of my favorite prospects, extremely underrated. Played in the 3-4 in college and has a knack for rushing the passer. Long arms offset his smallish height(6-2/240 I believe), and he showcases a good all-around skillset. Good insurance in case Hali/Houston go down since I don’t trust Sheffield or Studebaker with too many minutes.
This is my last mock before FA Period begins. I honestly don’t think I could make a better mock that I’d like unless I could fit Sam Acho’s brother in there somehow.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 21, 2012 2:59 AM CST up reply actions
My only issue is that there is no real competition for Cassel
I could live with Orton, Manning, RG3, a QB in rounds 2-3 (Osweiler, Cousins, Foles). As long as there is legitimate competition for Cassel. Or are you thinking Stanzi is the competition
KC Draft prediction: No OT taken in first round
by trentchiefsfan on Feb 21, 2012 3:28 AM CST up reply actions
Stanzi and Davis are competition
Another QB just couldn’t be worked in unfortunately, mainly because I forgot, but I really like Stanzi, and if we build a good team around Cassel I think he can be effective.
If my draft pans out like I think it will, we could trade up next year for a QB since we won’t have too many needs outside of QB.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 21, 2012 3:42 AM CST up reply actions
I would like something more than a 5th and 7th round rookie to challenge Cassel.
legitimate competition is needed.
KC Draft prediction: No OT taken in first round
by trentchiefsfan on Feb 21, 2012 7:11 AM CST up reply actions
At what price though?
Most 2nd round QBs are useless, you spend a high pick on them.. but they are the 2nd or 3rd tier guys who usually still end up getting replaced because they either do not have the skill set or do not develop fast enough. Do remember a great article about how many teams picked a QB in the 2nd or 3rd round and they just ended up picking a high QB in the next few years
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 21, 2012 8:37 AM CST up reply actions
Stanzi is legitimate
I don’t really care what round they came from tbh.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 21, 2012 2:26 PM CST up reply actions
Could Osweiler fall to us in the 4th?
I’d like him better there….
by AnkenyChiefsFan on Feb 21, 2012 9:42 AM CST up reply actions
I get this feeling we'll start to see a few more "tag/trade Carr+picks for RG3" drafts
KC Draft prediction: No OT taken in first round
If we're going to tag and trade Carr
can it be to someone besides NE? I hate those B*st*rds…
How about to the Cowboys? They have a better pick anyway…and they need a corner badly. Carr for their 1st. It’s higher, so no 3rd rounder. Then trade our 2 #1’s and next year’s #1 to St. Louis for their pick and get RG3. Does that add up about right? Sweeten the deal with Dorsey.
by AnkenyChiefsFan on Feb 21, 2012 3:11 PM CST reply actions
I don't think we can get the Cowboys pick for Carr
They’d probably offer a 2nd and thats it.
Plus i HATE the Cowboys.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 21, 2012 3:50 PM CST up reply actions
would you do a 2nd this year..
AND a 2nd next year? Because I would.
Time to take back the AFC West
Go Chiefs
by King of the Cassel on Feb 22, 2012 1:11 AM CST up reply actions
How about a late first
That we trade for a 2nd this year and a first next year?
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 22, 2012 1:26 AM CST up reply actions
Or how about a trade with tampa bay. They are rumored to want a CB in free agency
And one in the draft that can start. Why not trade Carr for their 2nd round pick this year and a 1st next season.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 22, 2012 2:15 AM CST up reply actions
I doubt tampa trades a future first
They could pick top 5 again, and with a new HC they’re probably gonna want to keep all of their picks anyways.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 22, 2012 2:21 AM CST up reply actions
Maybe but they have nothing at corner. Both starters are gone and their depth was already bad there.
The CB market this offseason is also pretty bad with Routt and Carr being the two best starters. We could change it to 2nd and 4th this year with a 2nd next year.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 22, 2012 2:23 AM CST up reply actions
They could target Morris Claiborne
And it is a pretty deep CB draft as well.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 22, 2012 3:27 AM CST up reply actions
They certainly could and I think they might target Claiborne and make a play for a big corner.
How much of an immediate impact would drafting Claiborne at 4 and trading 2 second’s for Carr make to their defense? Adding a proven great CB with a playmaker with tons of potential and all of the help they’ve put into the front 7.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 22, 2012 10:51 AM CST up reply actions
My updated pre combine mock with the Routt signing factored in.
Franchise and trade Carr to Tampa for their 2nd and 4th round picks this season and a 2nd round pick next season.
Resign Bowe, McClain, Richardson, Daniels
Sign Anthony Collins (RT, Bengals), Ahtyba Rubin (NT/DE, Browns), Brady Quinn (QB, Denver),
1 (pick 11): David Decastro, G, Stanford
Strictly BPA pick and he happens to match a potential need. Decastro should start immediately and that should allow Lilja to be our backup interior lineman.
2 (pick 4): Lamar Miller, RB, Miami
A potential super star running back that is available in CBS rankings. I see him as JC insurance and a great running mate with him that should excel in the ZBS.
2 (pick 12): Jared Crick, DE, Nebraska
Drops because of injury but has all the tools you look for in a 5 tech. Looks very good standing up his man and using his long arms to keep defenders where he wants them.
Depth move with starting potential. Should allow flexibility with Dorsey potentially being moved.
3 (pick 11): Antonio Allen, SS, South Carolina
Safety depth with starter potential. Can be used in man on tight ends or as a third safety in some nickel formations.
3 (pick 19): Ladarius Green, TE, LA Lafayette
TE depth behind Moeaki that poses matchup problems when on the field. A very athletic player that has a very high ceiling.
4 (packaged to move to pick 19 in the 3rd)
4 (packaged to move to pick 19 in the 3rd)
5 (pick 11): Josh Chapman, NT, Alabama
A player that has fallen because of injury and being a one dimensional run stuffing DT. Should be a solid rotation player.
6 (pick 12): Robert Blanton, CB, Notre Dame
A big developmental corner that has a decent upside for a 6th round pick. Might be on the practice squad at first.
7 (pick 11): Levi Adcock, OT, Oklahoma St.
A developmental lineman. Played tackle in college but may have to move to guard. Seemed to have a ton of potential going into the season.
7 (pick 31): Aaron Corp, QB, Richmond
A developmental former USC QB that never really had a shot due to injury. Small frame that he will need to fill out but he has the arm to play in the NFL.
Rubin signed a 4 year deal in 2011
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 22, 2012 3:26 AM CST up reply actions
Bad website info then, my bad.
But even still you can switch him to any number of big bodied veterans.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 22, 2012 10:51 AM CST up reply actions
"Strictly BPA pick and he happens to match a potential need."
How do you determine that its a BPA? What players do you think will be there that De Castro is better then?
"Give them nothing! But take from them everything!"
by GenericBrand on Feb 23, 2012 2:03 PM CST up reply actions
Well there are over 400 players that are draftable right?
All but 10 or 11 of them will be taken.. so be a long list of who DeCastro is better than :)
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 23, 2012 3:21 PM CST up reply actions
Damn you
You know what I mean!
"Give them nothing! But take from them everything!"
by GenericBrand on Feb 23, 2012 3:36 PM CST up reply actions
I have DeCastro rated higher than most, even have him above Kalil
I don’t see anyone being there(even APers mancrush of Richardson) that is a better prospect
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 23, 2012 4:36 PM CST up reply actions
Sub Claiborne for Richardson and that is my top 5
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 24, 2012 8:44 AM CST up reply actions
Kalil is a big ol ? to me
He played in college at a very lean weight and will have to put on 20-30 lbs and that could drastically affect what he does. I know Tyron Smith also had to put on weight and seemed to adjust well but Kalil might not be so lucky. If you remember with Albert how long it took for him to lose weight and adjust and I imagine its even harder going the other way.
"Give them nothing! But take from them everything!"
by GenericBrand on Feb 24, 2012 12:48 PM CST up reply actions
He is already up over 300 and still looked lean
Will still be able to grow into his frame further when he hits the NFL and the weight training
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 24, 2012 2:26 PM CST up reply actions
I hate to speculate on the guy getting bigger, BUT
it’s possible to err on the side of big-ness and end up with a guy who’s a step or two too slow to be effective in the NFL. I always (semi-) diss the Patriots for reaching for need in the 1st, and then not having Solder be an instant starter, certainly no threat to Light, last year. And yet, you can see this guy close to 300 pounds, who can run and actually did some H-back kinds of things.
Then I look at Mike Adams and those fielder’s mitts he calls hands, and go “Hmmmmm……”
would of ≠ would've
Yeah getting bigger isn't something you want to have to deal with
However, the Core strength is there to build upon. He doesn’t have to gain any more weight IMHO, just needs to build upon his already great strength to become effective.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 24, 2012 6:18 PM CST up reply actions
It depends on the players frame really
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 24, 2012 8:28 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah. I think Adams has the feet, and he's a bigger dude than Solder.
So maybe the OT-in-the-first guys are onto something. I know that OT, either side, is a lot tougher to get RIGHT, and calls for more drastic measures. But I’m biased by the poor track record of drafting OT over the years. John Tait was a decent 1st-round OT, but he split as soon as he got a chance.
Victor Riley, 27th pick overall in ‘98. Trezelle Jenkins, 31st pick overall in ’95. Each time, KC waited another 4 years or so to go to the well, again, even when it was clear that they’d missed much sooner, and they just limped along. We all remember the QB rotisserie over that period, but forget the missed picks and the failure to go back and get it right.
would of ≠ would've
Its not often you find a Willie Roaf in FA
Most great OTs get re-signed by their respective draft teams it seems like.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 25, 2012 1:27 AM CST up reply actions
No, it's not. I was expressing angst about getting a rectangle, on the premise
that all squares are rectangles (1st round OT), but not all rectangles are squares (Riley, Jenkins). Just because the 1st is where the really rare ones are most likely to be doesn’t mean that you’re not likely to trap yourself in the position of having to start that 1st-rounder, when he really isn’t going to be more than mediocre.
In other words, if you’re burnin’ the 1st, you better be pretty damn sure of yourself (or have no other needs).
These guys are pretty athletic, and that’s important, but taking it to the next level, I want the feet AND the beef, and I think that Adams might be the one guy not named Kalil who warrants a 1st-round pick, and even he’s kind of a “Is his head really in it?” thing.
Of course, in the Riley and Jenkins cases, they were guys who met the measurables, but somebody didn’t notice they were too slow. My present concern is guys with the feet, but who just don’t have enough lead in their ass to take on the bull rush and push people around in the run game.
would of ≠ would've
OT in the first is usually the best way to go if you need an LT
However gunning for a RT is usually left for the bottom of the first or later in the draft, not the 11th pick. Can’t say I’m personally sold on Reiff/Martin at RT. Reiff does look more like the classic ‘mauler RT’ but Martin seems like a better option at LT than he would at RT.
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 25, 2012 5:46 AM CST up reply actions
The first, to me, is about getting the more dominant players.
That’s partly why I was OK with getting a dominant interior player, even if it was a reach.
And while I think people are less picky about RT, and are willing to wait on it, you can see how defenses take advantage of RTs, too. Huge bookends fan. Not afraid to reach for a great one for the right side, especially since it can help me on the left side, down the road, when I’m in a bind.
Watching how Albert, at 320, swallows up those speed rushers, and is a load in the run game, I view a lot of these quick-footed, but smaller, LT prospects, with skepticism.
To me, the reason LT is so much a 1st-round thing is because a guy who’s BIG and has good feet is so very rare. All the rest is misapplied analogy, imo. Nowadays, they’re going for the good feet, and accepting the spread offenses this channels them into. A great team has that rare LT, and isn’t afraid to reach for him.
You always hope that one of these big guys can weight-train and grow into a behemoth, with good feet, but that, to me, isn’t something you spend a 1st-rounder on, unless everybody else is being stupid, and that 2nd- or 3rd-rounder you target is next up on the board before the 1st is done. I’d mostly rather be counter to the league tendency, but sometimes the league tendency can drive you to pick earlier than you’d want to, even for a guy you see as developmental.
would of ≠ would've
I don't think Branden Albert is 320 anymore.
I’m almost positive he slimmed down when we switched to a ZBS a few years ago.
"[Jamaal Charles] probably fights crime in his spare time while inhaling carbon emissions, exhaling oxygen, and crapping oil. That’s how awesome he is. Not just good for the Chiefs, but America."
- MNchiefsfan
Anthony Davis is doing well for himself
And Reiff really isn’t a mauler, more of a technician from what I’ve seen.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 27, 2012 3:58 AM CST up reply actions
If you compare Reiff and Martin as I was
Then Reiff is the mauler of the two
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 27, 2012 5:46 AM CST up reply actions
I would put my top 5 prospects as
1. Andrew Luck
2. Robert Griffin III
3. Trent Richardson
4. David Decastro
5. Matt Kalil
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 23, 2012 9:00 PM CST up reply actions
Also...
No way Adcock is there in the seventh round. He’s coming off a pretty serious injury and some healing complications but if he’s healthy he’s as good or better then the guys available in the second round.
"Give them nothing! But take from them everything!"
by GenericBrand on Feb 23, 2012 2:05 PM CST up reply actions
Serious Injury?
He played the entire Stanford-OkState Bowl game.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 23, 2012 2:24 PM CST up reply actions
Thanks
This is the second time this season I’ve read Adcock and it’s registered as Datko.
"Give them nothing! But take from them everything!"
by GenericBrand on Feb 23, 2012 2:41 PM CST up reply actions
Ignored this
Read Adcock, wrote Adcock but it registered Datko in my head.
"Give them nothing! But take from them everything!"
by GenericBrand on Feb 23, 2012 2:42 PM CST up reply actions
I liked the origianl scenario with the trade down and Carr trade.
But my picks would be different.
Rd 1 pick 21 OG or OT Cordy Glenn
Rd 1 pick 31 ILB Hightower
Rd 2 pick 11 OT Sanders
Rd 2 pick 21 TE Charles or Fleener or Allen
Rd 3 DT Ta’Amu
I have to wonder if we traded Carr to NE for their pick number 27 straight up.
If pick 11, pick 27 and next years first would be enough to move up and take RG III. Because if it is then I would love to make that move. We keep all of our non first round picks to put solid players around him. Draft would look something like this:
1. (pick 2): Robert Griffin III
1: Traded for RG III
1. Traded for RG III
2. (pick 11): Zebrie Sanders, RT, Florida St.
Future starter at RT that should challenge Richardson immediately.
3. (pick 12): Ladarius Green, TE, LA Lafayette
Depth and massive talent at TE. Matchup nightmare
4. (pick 11): Lucas Nix, G, Pitt
Developmental guard and depth behind Lilja and Asamoah.
5. (pick 12): Akiem Hicks, DE, Regina
6’5 328 lbs that was committed to LSU but there were recruiting violations.
6. (pick 11): Janzen Jackson, S, McNeese St.
Very talented safety that was kicked off the team at Tennessee.
7. (pick 12): Nicolas Jean-Baptiste, NT, Baylor
More defensive line depth in the form of a pure NT prospect.
nice
I would love to trade up for RGIII. If our draft looked anything like what you mocked, I would be very happy. Janzen Jackson and NJB late are especially good pickups. Have not heard much about Hicks but looks like he could be a great steal late in the draft. The only thing you are really missing is an offensive playmaker (WR/RB), but with the weapons we have already, we might not need one.
by Brett Chamberlain on Feb 23, 2012 3:51 PM CST up reply actions
Green is that playmaker
A pure receiving TE to go along with the all round TE in TonyM, Breaston, Baldwin, Bowe, JC
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 23, 2012 4:37 PM CST up reply actions
Manning changes EVERYTHING
if they are somehow able to sign Manning, which appears now to be a possibility… I think it changes the whole offseason outlook.
RE-Sign: Carr (with Routt’s deal structure, it seems more possible now), Bowe (why wouldn’t he want to play w Manning? he might even take less money to do so), McClain (ditto)
other FA adds (besides Manning): Anthony Collins, RT (gotta protect the big guy), Shaun Rogers/Franklin (I’d love Soliai here, but I think there’s a limit to how much they’d spend)
Draft:
1) DeCastro: Protection is key, again… and with Collins, the next biggest OL need is also the BPA
2) Charles, TE: depth/insurance for Moeaki, can run those NE-style 2 TE sets
3) Massie, RT: Doubling down on the RT position, and adding depth to the OL
4) Janzen Jackson, FS: good value and developmental depth in the secondary
5) Chapman, NT: Great value, even if he is on the PUP
6) Wylie, WR: another target for Manning, 4.3 speed good route runner in the slot
7) Adrien Cole, ILB " a tackling machine that had 120 stops in the regular season (72 solo)."
7) Eddie Pleasant, SS:
ok, so it doesn't really change everything, as my mock hasn't really changed THAT much
but, I think Manning increases the focus on the OL (even more) and makes KC very attractive for other FAs
That would work for me
Maybe not another OT that high.. Datko later and BPA in 3 or a RB like Pierce/James/Gray
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 24, 2012 8:49 AM CST up reply actions
Well would still be doubling down with Datko
Who if he is healthy is a much better player and prospect than Massie
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 24, 2012 9:07 AM CST up reply actions
Getting a solid player in Collins, could wait and take a guy later IMO
Get another RB/weapon
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 24, 2012 9:45 AM CST up reply actions
works for me
Pead, Miller, Martin are all RBs I’d like to see KC take
I’d also be happy with Richardson, IF they made some other good moves on the OL
Would love to get Miller to pair with JC
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 24, 2012 2:27 PM CST up reply actions
I like it...just a couple of ??
Do you really think Massie will drop to the 3rd? Is Cole a good prospect for SILB, or are you thinking of him more as a backup to Belcher/Siler/Johnson?
by AnkenyChiefsFan on Feb 24, 2012 12:10 PM CST up reply actions
Here is how we get RGIII
We hope RGIII gets drafted by Cleveland at #4. Cleveland wants Trent Richardson but doesn’t want to risk dropping to #11 and having Trent not available then but they don’t want to draft him at #4. But if he is available at #11 the Chiefs draft him and trade him and our 2nd and 4th Round picks to Cleveland for RGIII.
not sure if srs
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 24, 2012 10:33 AM CST up reply actions
Here is a scenario that I could live with.
FA we sign Bowe, McClain, Henne (follows Deboll and gives Pioli his “competition at QB”), and a NT.
We tag Carr and trade him for a 1 next year and a 3 this year. Deep at QB in next year draft and it would be nice to have the extra pick if we feel we need to move around.
We trade down with our 1st pick and get an extra 3rd.
1. Cordy Glenn – he can be our new RT, and always move back inside at a later time.
2. Chase Minnifield – an extra CB that would move ahead of Arenas and Brown.
3A. Orson Charles – TE to pair with Moeakli
3B. Antonio Allen – Yes another DB, but great depth for S.
4. Vick Ballard – RB on a bad SEC team that still gained over a 1000 yards.
5. Chris Galippo – ILB that could challenge Siler/Belcher. Good ST.
6. Marqiz Maze – Add some speed to our WR.
7A. Beau Reliford – BB player turned TE and I like to put him on the PS and see if he could be another Graham.
7B. Nicolas Jean-Baptise – NT depth with FA and Powe.
If we get a 3rd this year for Carr...
shouldn’t you have a 3A, 3B, AND 3C? Our third, the one we get for trading down in the 1st, and the one for Carr. I like the draft otherwise, as I feel it addresses most of our needs.
by AnkenyChiefsFan on Feb 24, 2012 12:12 PM CST up reply actions
Alshon Jeffery weighs in really lean
216? That’s pretty incredible for a guy that hasn’t been any less then 230 his entire college career.
"Give them nothing! But take from them everything!"
Probably trying to get his 40 time as high as possible.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 24, 2012 2:04 PM CST up reply actions
That and all the rumors that his weight ballooned to 250.
"Give them nothing! But take from them everything!"
by GenericBrand on Feb 24, 2012 2:10 PM CST up reply actions
10.5 inch hands
This guy just needs to get his head straight. Rumor in Houston has them taking a WR in the first and Jeffery matched with Johnson would be ridiculous.
"Give them nothing! But take from them everything!"
by GenericBrand on Feb 24, 2012 2:11 PM CST up reply actions
Well there was this tweet
Joe Everett @RookieDraft
now
WR Alshon Jeffery, #SouthCarolina is training at St Vincents here in Indy. Sources say he’s weighing 249lbs + running a 4.88 Forty #NFLDraft
which then turned into..
Benjamin Allbright @NFLDraftMonster
·More
Alshon Jeffrey 4.88 time, is outright untrue. Hearing whispers its being floated from his camp, so he blows expectation away at combine.
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 24, 2012 2:31 PM CST up reply actions
David DeCastro did 34 reps on the Bench, whispers of him going top 12
32 3/8" Arms, this is why he isn’t a tackle.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
Guy is definitely a stud.
I will argue for a lot of other prospects but i in no way would be mad if we took Decastro. Same thing I thought about Berry when we took him. I would argue for McClain or other players at the time but at the same time Berry was always a great pick in my book, same thing with Decastro.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 24, 2012 4:30 PM CST up reply actions
I'm not saying I'm like Ups but
I’ve wanted DeCastro for us since I found out where we’re drafting. I felt the same way with Berry.
Also you catch Orson Charles? 6’3/250, body builder physique and good hands. Don’t know why people were worried about him being under-sized. Wouldn’t mind him in the 2nd if he’s there, he may sneak into the first round with a good combine.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 24, 2012 4:46 PM CST up reply actions
I like Charles in the second as well. But the TE class i pretty good this year.
Charles, Fleener, Allen, Green all look like legitimate playmakers.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 24, 2012 8:30 PM CST up reply actions
Green will need to gain some strength
But, he’s got willing-ness to improve on blocking and huge hands for catching passes. Plus he’s pretty athletic, I think he’s got a bright future.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 24, 2012 9:04 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah I really like Green
I think he will be a matchup problem for a lot of teams with his height especially if he runs a solid 40. I would rather have Green in the 3rd than Charles in the 2nd imo but either would be good moves. Green also shows the ability to move around as a WR a bit.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 24, 2012 9:21 PM CST up reply actions
Ridiculous at his height and length.
Monstrous hands too. Guy is going to be special
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 26, 2012 1:17 PM CST up reply actions
I don't think I was offbase giving him our 2nd round grade
Although I think Charles/Fleener/Allen will push him back some, Green seems to be on par with the Jermichael Finley’s and the Hernandez’s of the league.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 27, 2012 4:00 AM CST up reply actions
I agree
Special athleticism at the TE position.
by Jonathan Hake on Feb 27, 2012 8:11 PM CST up reply actions
LaMichael james - 5'8 & Nearly 200 Lbs
The next Darren Sproles.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
Me too
He might actually be more of a “Pocket” Jamaal Charles
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 27, 2012 3:58 AM CST up reply actions
Before I post my mock I wanted to know what people thought
about Dominique Hamilton? He was a DT at Mizzou and I don’t live in the area so I didn’t get to really see him play. Any thoughts? He’s risen up some boards, some have him ranked as high as a late 3rd. He’s 6’5" and about 320, real solid size for that DE position.
Time to take back the AFC West
Go Chiefs
by King of the Cassel on Feb 24, 2012 7:51 PM CST reply actions
Updated Combine Data Sheet
If you see a hand/arm size/length, that means the ht/wt are Combine measurements as well.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Alwz_yLmGQM8dFREVWdRMUtVMVdZd0Q1N3NZMEFMQ1E
Combine Data Sheet updated - Sunday
Couple of notes. I deleted the 10 yard split as it is an unofficial time and the unofficial 40 times varied from official times. I left Bruce Irvin & Ronnel Lewis with the DL group for the time being…they have evidently joined the LBs, but won’t know their numbers until tomorrow…
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Alwz_yLmGQM8dG9zbnVTTkNaVkMweXYwUFpCd2g2UVE

by 


























