Flowers vs Carr: 1 vs 2??
Okay. After much debate on this issue, and with Carr's re-signing being one of the most talked about topics, I decided to clear up some things. Seems we have a back and forth ballgame on who's better, Carr or Flowers. I personally think Flowers is, but I also can say that Carr is giving him a run for his money. My irritation to this matter is when people look at a site like, lets say Pro Football Focus, and see Carr ranked in top 10 on some categories. Since Flowers name isn't nowhere around, they assume Carr must be better. I mean he is taller! Plus, with us having CBs that maintain their respective side of the field, this ranking must be telling? WRONG! I'll explain without trying to be too lazy to actually back up what I backed up!?!?
Since the " Carr is a top 10 CB on the rankings and Flowers isn't" is mainly coming from the Pro Football Focus page, I will mostly focus on that.
I have always thought of Flowers as the #1 CB and Carr #2. Not by position on field, but more of talent displayed. Apparently, others feel differently about the talent, and who can blame them. Carr has looked solid. One can argue that he isn't under the microscope with the expectations Flowers has, which doesn't have us dissecting him as much. But others can say, doesn't matter, Carr is better. Which they maybe right.
#1 or # 2? LCB or RCB? Does it even matter what side the CBs are on, I mean, WRs line up everywhere. Well apparently to Pro Focus Football, it does.
While doing a breakdown on Asomugha and his comparison to Revis, PFF stated:
Revis, as we know, is integral to what the Jets do, because he allows them to take away the opposition’s best receiver, and to concentrate on the other weapons on offense and roll coverages toward them. Revis does that because he tracks receivers from one side of the field to the other, and even to the slot. Asomugha doesn’t. In fact, Asomugha not only doesn’t track receivers, but he lines up on the right hand side of the defense, the ‘easier’ cornerback position. It’s easier because most passers in the league are right handers, and so naturally throw more to their right, to the left cornerback’s coverage. The only right handed quarterback to pass equally to the left as well as the right is Peyton Manning, everybody else attacks the left cornerback more often.
.
The part to mostly focus on is when they mentioned : "Asomugha not only doesn’t track receivers, but he lines up on the right hand side of the defense, the ‘easier’ cornerback position."
Now yes, WRs line up on both sides. But the percentages show, from PFF of course, that QBs mainly throw to their strong side, which for most QBs, is their right. Even if they throw it equal amount of times to each side, seems to be that the right side is their most comfortable, meaning better throws. If they had to roll out of pocket because of pressure, they would rather run to the right. Gives them a more natural throw. If they had to scramble to the left, it would not only be unnatural for them, but probably not a throw they have a high percent of making. Even if the QB rolled out to the right and threw to the left, not only would it be difficult, it has a high chance of being picked. So one would think by percentage wise, the top WR would more times then not, line up on the right side. Now one could say "what about the lefties?" Well, according to PFF, the league is mostly (and very STRONG mostly) right handers.
So can we say Flowers has the more difficult task over the two? Hell yea we can. I mean, PFF set the whole top 10 Carr movement in place and they just proved Flowers has a harder job. And for the record, I am not hating on PFF. They do a crazy job of getting stats straight out of the depths of hell. I am hating on the people who read it without reading the small print ( which I am sure someones comment will find something I overlooked, or underlooked).
Next issue would be the 2 topics in which Carr is top 10 and Flowers doesn't make the cut. For those who haven't read it, there are 2 topics in which Carr placed in top 10 across the league. And despite the fact I will slice up those names, it really is kudos for Carr. He deserves the recognition. I hope we re-sign this man.
First category is completion percentage when teams are going after that CB. Top ten are:
# Name ---------------- TA Rec %Ct
1) Darrell Revis ----- 85 / 35 / 41.2
2) Ike Taylor ---------- 96 / 40 / 41.7
3) Brent Grimes ----- 56 / 25 / 44.6
4) Chris Gamble ----- 60 / 27 / 45.0
5) Sheldon Brown---- 76 / 35 / 46.1
6) Antonio Cromartie- 84 / 39 / 46.4
7) Richard Sherman-- 84 / 24 / 46.4
8) Asante Samuel ---- 61 / 29 / 47.5
9) Joe Haden --------- 85 / 42 / 49.4
10) Brandon Carr----- 79 / 39 / 49.4
Now don't let what I say next seem like I don't think any of these players are great because I do. And also don't let it come off like I think the Pro Bowl (which I'll get to) doesnt have its share of politics and players on this list that may have been snubbed. But, like PFF said, these list aren't too serious either. In fact this is what they said:
Numbers without context can be an awful thing and you can read a lot into what these say, but know that they’re by no means definitive on their own or combined. We always prefer our grading in situations like this where context can be taken into account … a dropped pass when a cornerback was beaten, just what exactly the cornerback did to force an incompletion, and so on.
But numbers are fun, and while we wait for the divisional round of the playoffs (and before Tebow kills the internet), it doesn’t hurt to have a look and make something out of them.
Did ya see where it said a dropped pass when a CB was beaten? Yes I know it happens on both sides of the field. But if the theory is true, then passes going to the left might be stressed passes because of roll out situations/ cross body throws that make it an unnatural throw, therefor reulting in an incomplete pass. Well it changes things doesnt it? How how many incompletes passes were overthrown versus actually being knocked out by the CB? These little pieces matter to really determine the whole story.
Out of this list of ten, only Revis made the Pro Bowl and none made the SB. I bring up the SB for the people who think we should pay Carr whatever it takes to keep him, even if it's wayyy over paying. How many really good CBs didn't make the Pro Bowl or this list? Quite a few.
Next list is the QB's rating when they throw at a certain CB:
| 1 | Darrelle Revis | NYJ | 45.6 |
| 2 | Asante Samuel | PHI | 52.4 |
| 3 | Chris Gamble | CAR | 53.3 |
| 4 | Ike Taylor | PIT | 54.8 |
| 5 | Lardarius Webb | BLT | 56.2 |
| 6 | Richard Sherman | SEA | 57.3 |
| 7 | Patrick Robinson | NO | 59.3 |
| 8 | Brandon Carr | KC | 61.7 |
| 9 | Carlos Rogers | SF | 61.9 |
| 10 | Brent Grimes | ATL | 62.9 |
Out of this ten, seven are duplicated. If this list means so much, why then does only Revis and Carlos Rodgers make the Pro Bowl off of both list? Seven players appeared on both list, yet only 2 of them are on the Pro Bowl roster, in which only 1 of those made the list twice. .
Point being, that this list doesn't really indicate every factor involved in determining a players skill. Pro Bowl doesn't either. But if Flowers made the Pro Bowl this year and not this list, would we even be having this discussion of whos better? 5 other players that made Pro Bowl are not on either of these list.
While we are on Pro Bowls, why not mention another "issue" people have with Flowers. His height. Yea I know, he isn't as tall as you would like him, but does it mean he will not reach his potential greatness? Four out of the 6 CBs on the 2011 Pro Bowl roster were 5'10" and under (3 at 5'10")..So....yea.
During my debate with this topic, I also heard about Carr being better then Flowers during 2010. "It was Flowers first 3 VERY solid games that padded his stats" the guy said. So sure enough, just like I knew I would, I found his source on PFF. Here it is:
That brings up the question of which Kansas City cornerback is covering who, but it may not be as important as we expect. Brandon Flowers is widely acknowledged as the top dog in the Kansas City secondary, but when we look closer at the numbers it is astonishing how much of that value came in the first three weeks of the season. In the first three weeks, we recorded Flowers with a ridiculous 95 percent Success Rate. He allowed only two completions over 10 yards, and one of those was a failed conversion on third-and-20. But since the Kansas City bye in Week 4, our numbers have Flowers as a very average player, perhaps in part due to a hamstring injury suffered in Week 11. The numbers tell a pretty astonishing story about the Kansas City defense after the bye week:
Stats for Flowers/ Carr 2010 weeks 1-15 (thats what they have):
| Charting Stats for Kansas City Cornerbacks, Weeks 1-15 | ||||
| Player | Yd/Pass Wk 1-3 |
Suc Rate Wk 1-3 |
Yd/Pass Wk 5-15 |
Suc Rate Wk 5-15 |
| Brandon Flowers | 2.3 | 95% | 7.6 | 51% |
| Brandon Carr | 12.1 | 42% | 6.4 | 62% |
Notice in the grey box that it mentions Flowers hamstring injury suffered in week 11. Lets start with week 12. Say the hamstring injury bothered Flowers for at least the next three games, it is a hammy we are talking about here. So can one say that if we are going to put an asterisk on the first 3 games of his VERY VERY good start, we should at least put one on the last 3 (possibly 4) games. I mean it's fair right? Evens itself out I would think? Now to find out what the REAL number would be, we would need a breakdown of the season without the first 3 and the last 3 (possibly 4) games included. Well, PFF doesn't have that available. If someone does have it, I would like to see it. But until then, we can't really use the ol' three game excuse anymore, can we?
Can we also throw in that PFF's All Pro team of 2010 (dated Jan. 12th, 2011), has Brandon Flowers and Champ Bailey as starters. Yea, over Nnamdi.. Same source people use to say Carr had a better 2010 season. Why wasn't Carr even in the PFF's All Pro team if he had the better season?
I feel I proved my point, but just to fling some shit as I walk away, let's mention Flowers ability to tackle. This is HUGE. Ya see, If you can't tackle as a CB, they will run the ball at you. Carr holds his own, but Flowers is in another class of his own. He is a star on his own list. Once again, coming from PFF:
Flowers’ PhysicalityAt the other end of the scale sits a player who has long since earned that recognition, and did it precisely because he has always been a complete corner. Denver’s Champ Bailey enjoyed an excellent season last year, after struggling through injuries in recent times. The Broncos star missed just a single tackle on 44 attempts, showing that he is as adept in run-support as he is in coverage. That mark wasn’t good enough to lead the league at the position though; that honor goes to a young corner hoping to work his way into the echelon that Bailey has resided in for some time.
Brandon Flowers from the Chiefs amassed 65 attempts, and missed just one tackle. NFL Draft guru Mike Mayock raved about Flowers’ physicality and tackling ability when he was drafted, and he is being proved right the longer Flowers plays. The Chiefs have put together an extremely talented young secondary, and Flowers’ career path has been steadily on the rise since he was drafted. Kansas City has themselves a corner with the potential to emerge as one of the league’s true elites, and he has the tackling skill and toughness to do so as a total package at the position, not just as a cover corner.
Just so we are clear, Flowers had 65 attempted tackles and only missed ONCE! Only one time! Bailey was second with 44 attempts and only one missed tackle. Everyone else's ratio is 27.5 and lower. How can we just ignore that like it's nothing?
Flowers and Carr are both CBs I hope to have in a Chiefs uniform for years to come. I understand the hype Carr is getting, but don't let that blur the fact Flowers is still sick. I mean if I wanted, I can bring up a source on the internet who says more things nice about Flowers, but I wont. Eff it, I will.
Bill Williamson, who covers the AFC West(love him or hate him), has Flowers down as his potential player to soon lock up the Pro Bowl. Now once again, I don't see Carr anywhere on that list. Me personally, I think Carr has a very good shot at being on Pro Bowl roster. This is just to show that you can get all kind of conclusions off the internet, doesn't mean crap!!!
But it sure is nice to debate which one of our Cornerbacks is better. That's a great problem to have.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.
117 comments
|
8 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Flowers = Carr, Carr = Flowers
each one has their strengths, each one has their weaknesses. But together with Berry and Lewis they make one hell of a defensive backfield. Give Carr a contract similar to what Flowers got
Agree
Flowers was a 2nd round pick as many knew he would be a good NFL player, Carr was a 5th.
Both have shown the ability to play elite in the NFL
Flowers should have no problem with Carr getting paid the same money :)
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 11, 2012 2:52 PM CST up reply actions
the question is, will Carr take the same money?
I think if Carr would sign for similar money to Flowers’ deal he would already be signed. The situation still hanging in the wind (along with the Chiefs inquiring about Routt) makes me think Carr is a goner.
sooner or later, God'll cut you down...
what if it hasnt been offered to him?
Or maybe it has and there is other factors like years,guaranteed money,etc. Hard to say
by TheScreenName on Feb 11, 2012 3:18 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Screen, nice job! yeah, you really went after "someone" in this post ... ummmmmm ... but really, going thru all this, seems to me Carr really is "as good as Flowers"
I mean yeah, you have the stats, and you always ignore them or twist them or whatever, but there’s no evidence that Carr is NOT as good that I can see
do I think Carr is BETTER than Flowers? not really, but as good? yup … I’d say so, but I’m not a doctor :-)
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
thanks
Hey, good news when we have two CBs that give us a reason to debate whos better..Next year should give us our answer.
Heres a question though. Do you think teams would offer the exact same thing for Carr and Flowers in a trade scenerio? Hard for me to grasp Carr being worth more on the market.
by TheScreenName on Feb 11, 2012 2:42 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
no clue on that ... but I'd really rather not find out
Pioli just really needs to sign the guy and get on with it … whatever Flowers is making, same thing for Carr … they both rock and that’s all there is to it :-)
Twisted Lord of AP Color Commentary (H/T - Loco)
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
Who cares can we just keep both?
Pay him the same as Flowers for all I care we have the money, and if he wants more he’s entitled to it playing on a 5th round rookie contract for so many years. We haven’t had a tandem this good since the 90s, and I want to keep it that way.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
He is entitled to get paid more then flowers
Because he has been on a 5th round rookie contract for so long? He was paid according to where he was drafted. He doesnt get a “reward” for honoring a contract he signed.
I am ok with paying him near flowers type money, but to pay him more and then say " who cares" like money isn’t real, just is absurd.
You are paid what you are worth and he hasnt shown he us worth more then flowers. Might be worth same money but not more. Therefor, if he wants crazy money, you gotta look for best interest of team.
by TheScreenName on Feb 11, 2012 2:26 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Its in the best interests of the team to keep him
Solid corners that are consistent game-to-game and year-to-year are one of the hardest things to find in the NFL.
And its your opinion that somebody who seriously out plays their contract shouldn’t be awarded, I disagree.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 11, 2012 3:16 PM CST up reply actions
over paying for a solid corner? why?
I think a deal equal to flowers is fair. What if he wanted to be top paid CB in league? Give it to him right, i mean he deserves it since he honored is contract.
They should get rewarded. Rewarded with a new contract that pays them for what they are worth. You play good,you get paid good. You sign a four year deal, you play through the four year deal.
Problem with todays athletes is that they sign a contract based off what they are worth at the time, and as soon as they rise above that entry level skills, they feel they are allowed to break contract and should get paid NOW. Now when somebody like Carr actually plays the whole contract (sometimes under paid) without bitching, we see that as a class act and feel like they should get an award. The truth is, he did what this guys should, signed a contract and honored it. Now his play will give him an opp. to get paid per his skill. Makes me like Carr even more but doesnt make me feel we owe him more money.
Now say Carr gets Flowers type contract but plays like a 5th round rookie, should he pay us back? No.. its a contract.
by TheScreenName on Feb 11, 2012 3:33 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Im just scared down the road.
Yea obviously right now we have the money to sign both but, can we really afford to pay both corners that much money when we only have so much to spend?
dont have flowers yearly salary off my head but if he makes ( just guessing ) 8-9 mil. a year and you give carr 8-9 mil a year thats 16-18 mil a year in the cornerback position when we only got 120+ million a year to spend total. kind of scary to think about.
im content with a pretty good CB and a mediocre CB since we got berry back there.
I would on one hand like to see this happen though, rather than let carr walk if you do plan on NOT signing him cause of the price is to atleast sign and trade since we do have the money to sign NOW. might as well get something out of our good job of picking him in round 5.
thats actually a good thought
Sign him now, let his name get out there, then trade him or flowers based off what we would know at time. This is of course if we cant afford both… I am also thinking that pretty soon dorsey and jacksons contracts should be up and they both havent earned the money they were offered. Maybe re-sign for a pay cut?
by TheScreenName on Feb 11, 2012 6:10 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
I agree about dorsey and jackson, they have to make a ton of money.
I brought up if we traded dorsey would it help the cap much and someone said he wouldnt take much off I guess I should look up his salary. same with jackson. usually they dont restructure deals of people who just came into the league with there first contract from what I have seen, I bet if we wanted to resign them when that contract is up though it would be cheaper,
you two would spend a ton on an injured 36 year old QB
yet fret re-signing a top 10 CB due to cost?
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 11, 2012 7:08 PM CST up reply actions
Where did I say that at?
I wouldnt pay Manning a “ton”…But Manning being Manning is going to cost. My whole argument with re-signing is not over paying for him. Its not the spending money that I care about, its over paying. And by the way, Carr isn’t a top 10 CB in this league, sorry.
For an example, if Revis came to KC and asked to be the highest paid CB, I think you give it to him. If Carr asked us to be the top paid CB in the league, you laugh and walk away.
Do I feel we should pay Manning as if we were getting him 5 years ago? NO. But for the right price, I am not against it. I am not out there lobbing for Manning either though. In fact, I am happy with re-signing Orton and letting him get busy.
by TheScreenName on Feb 11, 2012 8:04 PM CST up reply actions
Responding in general to the thread:
I DO believe some sort of compensation for out-playing one’s contract is a good thing. I think it incentivizes the young up-and-comers and I think it’s helps you retain them, longer. Heck, I’d give a 5th-round rookie deal a bump if the guy earned a starting spot and did well. I’d do it way before his contract expired, when he’s GRATEFUL for the $2 million-per-year. I hate seeing players get squeezed by mgmt early, and then either get $10 million or hit the road.
I was OK with Pollard (The ANTI-PATRIOT – First Brady, then Gronk) hittin’ the road, but I thought it sucked that Page put in some good years for chump change, only to be hurt in his contract year, and then get punked by the Chiefs, when he entered RFA. Now maybe he just wasn’t all that good, but KC could’ve locked him up in ‘09 for very reasonable terms that Page would’ve seen as generous, but were VERY affordable for the college team Pioli inherited.
I think when you look at the long run (which I thought Pioli was all about), a little more generosity earlier on puts you ahead, because you have players who are comfortable millionaires, but a smaller number of players pulling down double-digit millions, per year.
It’s that penny-wise, pound-foolishness thing. We have something similar in our teaching contracts, where a brand-new college accountant saw all the sick leave payouts as a cost-cutting target. It turns out that the college was paying cash money, in proportion to the sick days an employee did not use, out of the number of sick days allowed. On the face, the institution was hemorrhaging money for sick days that were never used, and the teachers were cashing-in on a windfall.
What the bean-counter didn’t realize was that the buy-back of sick days is a nice incentive for never missing a day of work. Absenteeism among teachers is nearly NIL. When that reward is taken away, many teachers see those unused sick days as an excuse to call in sick when maybe they just feel like staying home. Use ’em or lose ’em. The cost to the institution is paying more than double for the same work, because they have to line up a substitute teacher (time and hassle for the department chair) and pay the substitute.
would of ≠ would've
by hmills110 on Feb 11, 2012 8:45 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
fail
I meant to say i would have re-signed him too before his contract was
by TheScreenName on Feb 11, 2012 8:59 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
You're a good man. :o)
I’m over-generous with my lawn crew, for the same reason. They see a piece of trash or a fallen tree branch and they take care of it, without being told. They ask for a specific amount of money, trying to be competitive, and I pay them from the POV of what it’s worth to ME to not have to do it. My number’s always above theirs, for some reason.
would of ≠ would've
but if a day came
Where they started asking for money that you knew was not within your budget, you would probably hire someone else.
by TheScreenName on Feb 11, 2012 9:50 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
and there is some one better to hire?
you assume that the 32 Free agent is going to be easy to replace?
sorta like Richardson, he is one of the top 3 Tackles available this off-season
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 11, 2012 10:11 PM CST up reply actions
ok
Raiders did ok without Asomugha,eagles didnt do shit with him…nothing is as bad as it seems. what amount is it where we say " sorry Carr"?
by TheScreenName on Feb 11, 2012 10:29 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
They mis-used Asoughma to begin the year, putting him in zone coverage
Once they kept him in man coverage QBs ignored him like they usually do.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 11, 2012 10:35 PM CST up reply actions
Yep. Didn't they fire the DC?
It was AMAZING that they’d have the vision to go after the guy and then not know what to do with him. That zone bullshit is for when you can’t single up. So you get a shut-down corner and try to play zone?
would of ≠ would've
No they didn't
But ending the year they were playing lights out, one of those teams you didn’t want to face if you wanted to make it into the playoffs.
What’s funny is Chuck Bresnahan did the same thing with the Raider’s Stanford Routt lol.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 11, 2012 10:50 PM CST up reply actions
He was in hot water, there, but yeah. Philly did get it together.
Memory check….
would of ≠ would've
I dont agree at all!!
I do think he should get a contract equal to Flowers…since they both seem to be playing at the same level now (it took several years to get Carr to this level). Maybe throw him a gold doggie bone as an equalizer for playing at a lesser amount for his rookie contract. But he needs to be reminded that he had to learn (from our coaches) how to play at this level. IE: turn your f’n head around!!
I think he should too
but I don’t think he should get MORE then flowers, especially for the simple reasoning of his rookie contract. He was a fifth round pick and he got paid like a fifth round pick. If the scouts thought he deserved more at the time, he would have been drafted higher. He played out his contract, thats what grown men are suppose to do. Now he will be rewarded for his hard play with a contract suited to his present talent level.
by TheScreenName on Feb 11, 2012 8:16 PM CST up reply actions
That's where the Invisible Hand of Adam Smith comes in.
Enlightened self-interest, it’s called. Some call it casting your bread on the water. Some call it karma. You treat folks better than you HAVE to, and are rewarded by loyalty. Breaks down when a greedy guy joins the game, but that greedy guy gets asked to leave, purty quick. Build a reputation for fairness, and people want to play for you.
would of ≠ would've
Nice post
I will be very ticked if the Chiefs don’t sign Carr because this secondary is special.
We're the same team as last year, except incredibly better, and with new players.
thanks
I feel same way. I would love to see what they can do for years to come
by TheScreenName on Feb 11, 2012 5:54 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
alot of time and effort into this, REC'd
I agree flowers is better than carr just using my eyes though, personally im not big on either one as being someone I feel so confident in when facing stud WR’s, they are usually great against mediocre guys though or average guys in my opinion.
yea but Nnamdi and revis always had a way of shutting down guys like andre johnson and so on.
thats having confidence, kind of like how champ usually shuts bowe down.
Against those bigger, better WRs, Carr can do more than Flowers, imo.
Carr has developed into something very very close to a true shutdown corner. On the right side of the defense, maybe that gives him an edge over Flowers. QBs like their best WR over there on their right side, and Flowers sees more than his share of them. When that happens, it’s very nice having Carr on the other side, able to take the guy on, and they can roll more help to Flowers’ side.
Flowers is like a mini-James Hasty when it comes to tackling. Carr’s very good, as well, but not the beast we have at LCB.
Carr used to be a target, when teams needed a deep ball completed. They knew that Carr would probably be in good position, but would probably NOT make a play on the ball. That changed in 2011.
Carr can stick with ANYbody and there’s not that over-the-top window that Flowers will give up. Flowers changes things up quite a bit, more or less jam, inside and outside leverage (and the outside tends to expose poor safety play). The changing-up makes it really difficult for QBs and WRs to execute with any precision. One play, the farthest the WR can get downfield is 20 yards, because Flowers fights him. The next play, there’s no jam and Flowers is right at that 20-yard spot, waiting on it. But you catch him 1-on-1 in off-man coverage, and they know what timing they’re going to get and the windows Flowers can’t close.
would of ≠ would've
I remember I think it was 09
And Flowers was having a Revis-Esque season when we had the worst pass rush of all time, and Carr on the other side would be on a WR like glue but would not turn his head around if his life depended on it and he really struggled being targeted a lot as the “other Brandon”
That was my only beef with him when he played, and in ‘10 after getting Thomas for a Coach he started to get that head around, and now in ’11 I can’t believe that was ever an issue with him.
Love the improvement, and I don’t think his ceiling has been reached yet.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 11, 2012 9:29 PM CST up reply actions
True
just like DJ and Bowe, seems their problems were solved
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 11, 2012 9:30 PM CST up reply actions
Not sure if serious...
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 11, 2012 9:53 PM CST up reply actions
Seriously
DJ and Bowe were not better?
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 11, 2012 10:09 PM CST up reply actions
At catching the ball?
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 11, 2012 10:35 PM CST up reply actions
Some of those things are hard to parse, CWP.
With piss-poor pass rush, you turn your head around, and the WR gets away from you, and THEN the pass comes. I imagine some of Carr’s improvement lay in his having more trust in the pass rush. There’s more likely PAYOFF in gettin’ your head around, now.
But yeah, Flowers was always pretty darn good, and Carr or somebody else, like the feet-in-cement safety or LB, was a much easier target. Being the best of a poor unit wasn’t as great an endorsement of Flowers as some might think. He still holds his own. He still needs help over the top against a fairly large number of large/fast WRs.
would of ≠ would've
I think the ticky tack injuries slow him down
09 is his only year in the Pros where he was healthy all year long IIRC, coincidentally it was also the best year he ever had.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 11, 2012 10:36 PM CST up reply actions
Stands to reason. But those injuries are why I like to overkill on DB.
Plus the fringe benefits on special teams that all that DB talent gives you.
Plus the flexibility to trade for picks when your corner is needed much more by another team, and you have a young turk waiting in the wings.
Plus the flexibility in pre-snap indications versus post-snap reality. RAC and Thomas did some cool things last year in that kind of deception. Getting Berry back will really help. You can play cover 2 or deep 3rds, with Berry starting off in the box.
would of ≠ would've
I was using just my eyes as well and determined that also
Sadly though, people see a top ten list like this and assume it is saying Carr is better. I heard someone mention how they both are different and have certain strengths that the other isnt as good at. I agree with that. But to say Carr is better, hard to buy. Maybe next year we can make that conclusion. Anyways, thanks.
by TheScreenName on Feb 11, 2012 6:04 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
I hope everyone remember what they was saying last year about carr.
I seen nothing but carr is the weakness last year, carr needs upgraded last year, thats all you heard from everyone now he is a stud? I must have missed it? I do notice carr catching more ints this year but it wasnt something to brag about, thats about the only improvement I noticed from carr the rest I give credit to the overall D being better.
Last year at this time, I was saying that Carr was more athletic, and his feet kept him in excellent position, compared
to Flowers, who had some speed issues and some height issues.
In 2010, he was STARTing to get his head around, better, but still wasn’t a big factor in making a play on the ball. You’d still see receivers reaching right over/around/through him to get the ball. Great position, but no sense of where the ball was. In 2011, in those SAME situations, he had his head around and he was starting to make plays on the ball, but more importantly knowing where the ball was, he was denying the WR a play on the ball.
Most of the time Carr will beat the block of a WR and make the play against the run. But Flowers is elite in that regard. Few are in that James Hasty class, like Flowers.
would of ≠ would've
Shorter and good?
But Flowers is elite in that regard. Few are in that James Hasty class, like Flowers.
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 11, 2012 9:17 PM CST up reply actions
There is no reason to think enemy offenses do not match up tall against Flowers
when that doesn’t work they have Tall vs Tall so the Pair of CB’s is better as a tandem.
Pay them as a tandem and let’s move on to more difficult questions :)
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 11, 2012 9:20 PM CST up reply actions
He lead the league in Passes defensed
I think he could play on the ball pretty good in 2010, maybe not catch it but thats why he’s not a WR ;)
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 11, 2012 9:30 PM CST up reply actions
I'll be honest
I lean Carr. There’s a reason so many balls go at Flowers. Do guys go specifically at great CBs? No they don’t, but they certainly go after Flowers.
I wonder
if any of that has to do with the leg injury? Did Flowers get exposed to a degree? Or has his injury lingered on?
I don't think the injury helped Flowers any, but to my eye, certain types of WRs have always given him problems.
If I have a Vincent Jackson, Flowers is gonna have a bullseye on his back. RAC will give Flowers help against those guys, but there’s definitely a vulnerability there. I’d prob’ly be more willing to leave Carr on an island with inside leverage on a tree than I would Flowers. In games where Flowers matches up against trees, you really see the Cover-2 come out, outside leverage with inside help (when everybody starts bitching about LBs in coverage) and over-the-top help.
It works, because Flowers is very good with those Cover-2 concepts. The LB that’s helping in coverage is offset by Flowers handing the tree off and coming up in run support. But against trees, he’s more of a liability than Carr, on those Cover-2 plays where the corner’s expected to play 1-on-1.
would of ≠ would've
So is Berry the answer?
or do we need someone off roster to help Flowers excell?
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 11, 2012 9:22 PM CST up reply actions
Berry's a big help. So would more pocket-crush by the NT. it all helps.
I really really like Flowers, but that wouldn’t stop me from continuing to pursue DBs. I’d love to develop them a little AHEAD-of-schedule, once in awhile. I wouldn’t WANT to get rid of Flowers, per se, but it would be nice to have bigger guys developing behind him. I’ll be watching the Seahawks with interest, in coming years, with their emphasis on bigger DBs.
Besides, I think the quality of your #3 and #4 CB is underrated in this league. GMs, HCs and DCs seem to prefer scheming to mask those matchup problems. A handful of teams chase after the top outside duo, but these days, offenses just flood the defense with more eligible WRs than there are quality DBs to cover them. IMO, that’s what happened to the Jets against the Patriots.
So I want to retain Carr, but I ALSO want KC to be aggressive in the draft at the corner spots, with picks in the first 3 rounds more often than not, and almost always drafting late for up-side.
But that’s me. I’m ALL about DB, WR, OL, DL in the first 3 rounds. Be better than other teams in those position groups, and it’s amazing how many good LBs, RBs and TEs you can turn up. QB. Well, I’ve ruffled enough feathers on that one…
Not that I’d NEVER take a LB/RB/QB early, but these would be the exceptional picks and not so much team-build picks. OLB remains the exception, because those guys are part of the front 5, with the same fundamental importance as line players.
Not that I’d NEVER be drafting late or looking at UDFAs up front and outside. But there’d definitely be a concentration of high picks at those positions, over others, until I felt the foundation was laid. Trouble is, it doesn’t seem to me that they’ve really BUILT a foundation, since Carl first came to town, and then they failed to maintain it, because they sucked at finding QB and WR.
would of ≠ would've
A foundation is laid
but I got confused if a QB is part of that or not.
Pioli chose to shotgun the OLB position after shotgunning the DE position.
While sharpshooting the O-line
I don’t see as many holes as others in this team build
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 11, 2012 9:51 PM CST up reply actions
Well, one scattergun shot at OL and it'll be time for QB, BIG-time.
And there’s always a chance that Cassel will look OK if the OL is finally better-than-OK.
Chiefs have a big hole at RT and another big hole in the middle of the OL. I would really like to see BOTH positions addressed, after watching numerous DTs and NTs against Lilja and Wiegs, and watching numerous DEs against Richardson.
I think KC can get at least marginal upgrade at RT, but not as instant or as great as some seem to believe. I think they can get a LOT more upgrade in the middle, right away, with one of the top interior linemen in the 2012 draft. I really want to see that before spending big on QB, again. I wish they’d gone scattergun one or more times on OL beFORE this, when I could, for once in my life, be with the majority on the QB thingie.
Yes, I think an elite QB can make NT dominance less of a factor, but gettin’ beat right up the gut is going to get even your elite QB crushed by outside pass rushers, more frequently than I care to see. So I WANT that elite QB, because that’s gonna make the difference in the postseason, BUT I don’t want to buy a Ferrari if I can only afford bald tires to put on it.
would of ≠ would've
Its funny you mention Vincent Jackson
He only had 8 catches for 112 yards and 0 Touch Downs against us last season.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 11, 2012 9:33 PM CST up reply actions
When you factor in that those kinds of numbers are what he usually gets during a single game
Plus a TD or 2 I think Flowers did very good against him this year.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 11, 2012 9:34 PM CST up reply actions
I was thinking Flowers shut down some good players also
AZ receiver last year I think
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 11, 2012 9:52 PM CST up reply actions
Steve Breaston?
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 11, 2012 9:54 PM CST up reply actions
Not a huge game for VJ, for SURE.
But I’m pretty sure they cheated help to Flowers. Also, VJ didn’t seem like the same player in 2011. I don’t know if it’s him, or because OL was poor enough that Rivers didn’t have quite enough to work with. Rivers is big on having that safety valve slot WR or TE, and I don’t think he had either one in 2011, and that may be why the opportunities for VJ were down, overall. I’m not sure.
But I’ve just seen too many instances, for instance, in the EZ, where it was pretty easy for VJ and Rivers, given some time in the pocket, or enough room outside for Rivers, to take advantage of Flowers in the 1-on-1. Too easy to put the ball where VJ can get it and Flowers can’t. If Flowers is one way, just throw it the other way. If he’s in perfect position, just throw it to EITHER side or over the top. It was painful to watch, because you just saw this little guy, with no chance of getting to the ball.
Flowers could’ve “done tactics” to foil VJ, if VJ weren’t also much faster than Flowers. We can talk about making that fly pattern tough to execute, with pressure up front, and I’d be all in with that. But that’s the scheme side, and not the pure eval side. And in the pure eval, there are physical types against which Flowers doesn’t match up very well. It may show up in safety help being late, or just in the number of opportunities given to the offense, because you’re sacrificing run D to give coverage help. But this issue is real, and even though I want to keep Flowers, I also want somebody with more elite measurables and comparable talent to be competing with him. I’d really like to have the option of swapping Flowers into the slot against the Welkers of the league, and having a bigger corner to line up opposite Megatron.
would of ≠ would've
Flowers is signed and good to go
Hopefully Carr is re-signed and also good to go
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 11, 2012 10:06 PM CST up reply actions
Did you read this?
right handed QBs in general go after the LCB. Its a fact they throw it to that side of the ball more, except for Manning who was equal.
Revis follows the best WR instead of staying on one side, where Asomugha played mostly on the offenses left side, which the QB throws less to already and even more so with Asomugha there.
So that would be your reason.
by TheScreenName on Feb 11, 2012 8:08 PM CST up reply actions
That's one of the reasons I view passes defensed and INTs with a jaundiced eye.
Back before most of you remember, there was this little nickelback, named Mark McMillian, who racked up some good INT numbers. Everybody LOVED Mighty Mouse, but to my eye, he was the weak link in the secondary and he got those numbers because he was the weak link that opposing offenses targeted. Sure, he got some picks. But more often, he got BEAT, and the bullseye was on his jersey in clutch situations.
would of ≠ would've
nickel
just like Arenas
We could do better at Nickel
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 11, 2012 9:24 PM CST up reply actions
Arenas was awesome last year
We need to get him off KR duty, he’s not going to last very much longer taking those kinds of hits and making those kinds of tackles every single game.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 11, 2012 9:35 PM CST up reply actions
Arenas was OK. He was still targeted over the middle, and I still haven't seen him
do much in the way of jamming WRs at the line. He can be a deadly blitzer off the slot, but I’d really like to see that complemented by some strong jams.
Seems like he’s indestructible as a KR. When he has the ball, it’s the other guy likely to get hurt.
So far, Arenas seems like more of an off-man kind of defender. He reminds me of a Blaine Bishop, and I’d kinda like to see how he’d look as a free-roaming safety, who could give you a little somethin’ as a corner on the changeup. But that just makes me think of what the D might be if they used Eric Berry more often as a corner. He has many of my earmarks for elite corner. Someone you’re not afraid to say to offenses “Yep. He’s 1-on-1 outside. What’re ya gonna do about it?”
But I can definitely see the league shifting to bigger guys outside, and these shorter, scrappier corners, like Arenas and Flowers, becoming fairly standard deep help and run support defenders. They have good ball skills and speed, and lined up at safety, there’s not the obvious height advantage to target, nor is it as easy to exploit the height advantage, with that little guy coming from a different angle to the ball.
The experiment of switching Flowers to a safety role didn’t look all that hot, to me. Seems to me the one time I noticed it, he was part of the deep help that failed to defend the 1st-down marker on a 3rd-and-20 or something.
would of ≠ would've
I don't remember Arenas allowing much passes this year, and when he did they were for limited yardage and were tackled for sure
I’ve always felt the less you hear a corner’s name the better, and outside of Punt Returns you barely heard Arenas’ name at all.
Wes Welker? 2 catches for 22 yards against us, that’s a damn good stat line to put on your mantle.
He’s a beast returner, but you gotta start looking long term. Returners for the most part don’t last very long, and I remember him getting hurt at the end of the year and that’s something that’s going to get worse with time. I sure as hell didn’t want McCluster returning all the kicks and getting offensive touches as well.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 11, 2012 10:45 PM CST up reply actions
And I remember with Herm/when the Haley era began
Slot WRs used to absolutely kill us, all the damn time in every single game.
Now? When I think of opposing offenses the Slot WR is the least of my worries, when I think of holes on Chiefs defense? I want a safety to take on Tight Ends or a Nose Tackle or even another pass rusher. Nickel back? Not even close.
Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!
by ChiefWarPaint on Feb 11, 2012 10:57 PM CST up reply actions
Still a big concern of mine. I think they're throwing extra people at the problem, at the expense of
other things. But that’s just me. The problem is less than it was, but they’re still not manning-up good enough to keep people from getting into their routes scot-free, a good chunk of the time, and the better QBs are gonna parse that, and know where their timing routes are.
Chiefs took away Welker, as best they could. Sparing enough hats to deal with their TEs in coverage, and suddenly New England was turning the corner on us in the run game, with numerical advantage at the point of attack and using it. Catch-22, there. You play the double tights like a run formation, and they beat you with the pass. Treat it like a passing formation and they run at the structural weakness in the D formation.
I think Arenas is a fine zone player and a sure, physical tackler. But you’re not going to see him stop the receiver from crossin’ in front of him, with inside leverage, very often. And you can throw it out in front or over him pretty easily, due to his height, when he’s in trail. He DID close on a few more, last season. Definitely seems to be improving, but I really like to see the D get right up in the opposition’s grill on a more or less regular basis, and there’s still a tendency to retreat into a shell against the slot and the bunch, right when I want ’em coming forward, and blitzing half the time they come forward.
would of ≠ would've
Interesting Take
Maybe a post on defeating the Patriots 2 TE offensive scheme?
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 12, 2012 8:24 PM CST up reply actions
i remember mighty mouse
Yea he was a target, but was awesome when he did make the play
by TheScreenName on Feb 11, 2012 9:44 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
It rankled for me. He was gettin' all the love, and for all the wrong reasons.
I was and am bitter about stupid things like that. Like, for instance, if Okoye had been able to block or catch a pass, just how DEADLY that KC offense would’ve been. Impossible to parse and unstoppable if you parsed it wrong. Like those Dallas Dynasty teams. Run and pass out of the same formation all day long, and at worst, it’s a tie for the offense, when the defense parses it perfectly.
would of ≠ would've
Mighty Mouse was one of my all-time least favorite Chiefs
For the exact same reason, Mills.
Fans loved him, but he was horrendous. His INT’s even tended to come off passes that were horribly under-thrown and he was beaten badly.
He was the weak link in that secondary…granted, the rest of it was ‘mighty’ stout.
I did read this
I don’t care what hand they are facing. If you lead the league in passes defended, it’s more than what side of the field you are on.
And unlike most teams, we only played 14 games against right handed Qbs
by Steve_in_RI on Feb 12, 2012 11:39 AM CST up reply actions
you are right, it is more then what side of the field you are on
It would it matter what WR he was guarding during those PD. If it was Andre johnson, Marshall, Jackson, on most of them, it would be really impressive. If it was a bunch of second and third strings, would it look different? Point of this reply and this post, is that not all stats tell the whole story. If the List of top 10 CBs in certain areas (in post) held any kind of volume to it, there would have been more of that list in the Probowl you would think.
But since you mention PDs, and lets take out what receiver was being guarded or what size foot the QB has and yada yada yada. In the four year careers of both these Very solid corners, we have these total Career stats (which again, only say so much).
Flowers: 60 games- 258 tcks- 4 FF- 4 FR- 13 INTs- 3 TDs- 70 PD- 11 Stuffs
Carr: 64 games- 237 tcks- 1 FF- 4 FR- 8 INTs- 0 TDs- 65 PD- 5 stuffs
Now judging off those numbers, Flowers has had the better career.And thats even playing the “harder CB position”( accoridng to PFF). How can we look at just one of Carrs seasons and determine he is better,yet? Cassel has had a season that would be equal to a great QB. Can we base his talent on just that one seasons stats? I think we need another year before we can fully measure where Carr, and Flowers for that matter, are.
The exciting detail in this whole thing is that Carr was a 5th rounder. I am just glad we found a gem (thanks Herm). Flowers isnt done blooming either.
by TheScreenName on Feb 12, 2012 12:33 PM CST up reply actions
Rec'd
Very well put together and informative post, sir. Personally, I think Flowers has the edge, though Carr is awesome too. Love the info about the missed tackle ratio. Just goes to show I’m not crazy when I think to myself Flowers is a helluva physical CB.
Yea I was impressed with Flowers ratio myself
I knew he was a great tackler but didn’t know he was that good. Carr actually didn’t do to bad on the tackling either. Glad you liked it, thanks.
by TheScreenName on Feb 11, 2012 8:11 PM CST up reply actions
alot of people are saying Bowe is the more important signing
I want our D to get even better, not regress, Bowe is important but Carr was a major reason for the D excelling at the end of the year
Agree Carr is a more important piece
relative to Bowe any ways
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 11, 2012 10:08 PM CST up reply actions
now this
I do agree with. Though Bowe with a great QB is going to scary
by TheScreenName on Feb 11, 2012 10:32 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
I think the priority is to re-sign both these guys. And this is what Pioli says, also.
would of ≠ would've
yea it should be
Pioli kinda has to say that,though i believe him this time
by TheScreenName on Feb 11, 2012 10:43 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
with the cash this team has to spend, i dont even think tis a 1 v 2 thing. just pay carr already, its embarrasing
Pay Brandon Carr/ Pay Colquitt
Team Colquitt
Yes, I agree
I dont think it does us much good trying to place them in a role as #1 or #2. I just kept hearing people shitting on Flowers while comparing Carr, as if Carr’s solid season takes out the talent Flowers has. To point out both of their weaknesses and flaws is fair, but to talk as if one is highly superior then the other, is laughable.
Anyways, Im with you, just pay him already so other teams can start shitting themselves
by TheScreenName on Feb 12, 2012 11:23 AM CST up reply actions
Flowers is better at tackling by far
he also shows more awareness on the field. However, Carr seems more physical when the ball is in the air. He can also guard the taller WR’s better. I love them both.
Great post, here's a tidbit from PFF's 2011 Tackling CBs study:
One other interesting number of note: despite his ropey start to the season, Kansas City’s Brandon Flowers remains one of the league’s must sure tacklers, and was the only qualifying corner not to miss a single tackle in coverage. Flowers was thrown at 86 times, allowed 46 receptions and made 40 miss-less tackle attempts.
"Toby has been cruising for a bruising for years, and I am now his cruise director. And my name, is Captain Bruising."
And Flowers was ranked 19th on their list this year:
59 attempts, 4 missed tackles.
"Toby has been cruising for a bruising for years, and I am now his cruise director. And my name, is Captain Bruising."
by bobby sippio! on Feb 12, 2012 12:02 PM CST up reply actions
Even Manning has a bad year from time to time
seems he didnt even throw a touchdown in the whole 2011 season. : )
by TheScreenName on Feb 12, 2012 12:13 PM CST up reply actions
Lol for sure. I really hope we can re-sign Carr and
get Eric Berry back and playing at 100%. Our secondary could be dominating for the forseeable future.
"Toby has been cruising for a bruising for years, and I am now his cruise director. And my name, is Captain Bruising."
by bobby sippio! on Feb 12, 2012 12:24 PM CST up reply actions
I am with you
I read on here somewhere that everyone on are D is pretty much homegrown. That makes me even more want Carr to stay.
by TheScreenName on Feb 12, 2012 12:37 PM CST up reply actions
ffs?
For fuck sake? taking a shot in the dark here
by TheScreenName on Feb 13, 2012 4:47 PM CST up reply actions
Great post TSN! Rec'd and thanks!
Nice to see we have a terrific secondary and can debate about who’s the best. :-)
I'm dressin my voodoo doll in stripes every season...
I'll have to go with Flowers as the better corner, he's been playing at a high level since day 1
And that’s been with shoulder, hamstring, and ankle injuries during those seasons.
Carr has only been playing well the past couple of seasons, credit is due to Emmitt Thomas. He finally got him to start turning his head while covering deep passes, which sometimes he still doesnt do.
It would be nice to keep the secondary together, but Carr could have gotten a deal done last year when he first became a free agent. He also waited until after training camp started to sign his 1yr tender offer, so that goes to show he’s going to want big money. In my opinion he still hasnt shown he is worth it, let him go and draft one of the top CB’s in Claiborne or Kirkpatrick.
by ChiefDailyBaked on Feb 13, 2012 9:39 PM CST reply actions
When you're singled-up and can't trust the pass rush, that head-turn is a toughie.
He’s definitely grown with the defense. Because of his physical abilities, I think he’s a notch above Flowers in a couple key categories, in particular, he’s a guy I can feel pretty good about playing the inside leverage any time I want to dial up a blitz, against pretty much any wide receiver in the league.
would of ≠ would've

by 























