Bowe n Dorsey to St. Louis...they get our 11th n maybe toss in next yrs 2nd rd?!? We will NOT have...

Bowe n Dorsey to St. Louis...they get our 11th n maybe toss in next yrs 2nd rd?!? We will NOT have a legit shot at grabbin a difference maker for several years to come (as I'm not planning on having a poor record anytime soon) so do what it takes to grab RGIII now. Elite speed, accuracy, big arm, VERY smart, great character. It's now or never. F Cassel. We need elite, not below average. It's THE most important position on the field. DO IT!!!

4 months ago CheefyWeefy 18 comments 0 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

I'm all for trading up to get RGIII

but, using draft picks, NOT good players.

this and next year’s first and 3rds or something like that

by stagdsp on Feb 10, 2012 8:05 AM CST reply actions

Dorsey, swap firsts, and next years 2nd

RG3!

I'm so overrated, I'm underrated.

by RememberDelaney37 on Feb 10, 2012 8:48 AM CST via mobile reply actions

Not enough

I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Josh Chichester TE 2012 Draftee

by BAMFSpecialOps on Feb 10, 2012 9:06 AM CST up reply actions

I was not aware that you worked for the rams.

by Chef's Kitchen on Feb 10, 2012 6:47 PM CST up reply actions

He's just saying he doesn't think it will be enough, he's obviously not making the decision for the Rams.

twitter.com/scottbwalters
twitter.com/hailtothechiefs

Fear the beard!

by scottbwalters on Feb 10, 2012 8:42 PM CST up reply actions

Pioli is never going to trade up and take that chance

Insert witty yet thought provoking phrase here.

by Fozzyboyd on Feb 10, 2012 8:54 AM CST reply actions

All the more reason to DISLIKE your post...

Giving up 2 former 1st round picks and a 2nd round pick, to swap firsts = a TERRIBLE idea…

Is JC Jesus Christ or Jamaal Charles? I think they both will be our savior.

by 25JCPavedTheWay on Feb 10, 2012 9:06 AM CST reply actions 2 recs

this team..

is about all set. Taking away important parts of the team IOT shower the Rams with players/picks is illogical and irresponsible.

The deal can be done, but not for what you’re suggesting. I also seriously doubt the deal will be done by us. There are quite a few teams who have the ammunition to broker a deal, no-sweat. Those teams also are quite a few pieces away from being complete, so “selling the farm” for a franchise quarterback wouldn’t affect them as much as it would us, if we did it.

I will enthusiastically give any move like your suggesting a thumbs down. I imagine i’m not the only one, either

by ScoutSoldier on Feb 10, 2012 11:04 AM CST reply actions

RGIII & Profit

Trade up for RGIII and profit

by ArrowheadHunter on Feb 10, 2012 11:05 AM CST reply actions

I think fisher was here to work out a trade

not interview for hc

just a conspiracy theory

Trade up for RGIII and profit

by ArrowheadHunter on Feb 10, 2012 11:10 AM CST up reply actions

StL can't afford Bowe.

I wouldn’t mind something like this idealogically, but StL has cap issues. No way they can give Bowe the money he wants.

sooner or later, God'll cut you down...

by nmchief on Feb 10, 2012 11:17 AM CST reply actions

I'd do it in a heartbeat

Bowe’s replaceable, Dorsey’s more than replaceable. RGIII could be a transcendent talent. And if he isn’t? At least we gave it a shot for once.

by Sam D on Feb 10, 2012 11:38 AM CST reply actions

#1

Bowe is a UFA. So the only way we COULD trade him is if we signed Him first, and what’s the point of signing a guy to huge deal (Bowe won’t sign anything but) just to trade him two weeks later. Who do you think we are, the Oakland Raiders??

by NWMOChiefsfan on Feb 10, 2012 11:40 AM CST reply actions

There's no way

St. Louis would be able to pay that much money

by NWMOChiefsfan on Feb 10, 2012 11:54 AM CST reply actions

Plenty of better QBs coming out next year that won't cost as much to get.

"Give them nothing! But take from them everything!"

by GenericBrand on Feb 10, 2012 11:55 AM CST reply actions 1 recs

i wouldn't say better...at least not yet

RG3’s stats this year are better than anyone else’s this year. His 3rd year stats are comparable/better to all of this year’s stats for 2013 QBs except Barkley, who will be picked in the top 3. Those QBs have to improve quite a bit to actually post better years than RG3.
The only knock on RG3 is the transition from spread to pro style.

by superpioli on Feb 10, 2012 12:40 PM CST up reply actions

Better is probably not the right word

There’s four guys coming out next year and will go in the first round that are safer then RGIII.

"Give them nothing! But take from them everything!"

by GenericBrand on Feb 10, 2012 12:48 PM CST up reply actions

70% completion and over 4,000 yards seems pretty safe to me

by Ray Brown on Feb 10, 2012 3:23 PM CST up reply actions

safer is the right word

however, its only because of the spread system.
Still, i would rather have rg3 for his competitiveness and intelligence. I don’t care if he has to sit a year and learn the pro system. Plus his dual threat is a bonus.
And btw…4 playoff qbs and 2 conf championship qbs were from college spread offenses this year. And another one set the rookie record for passing.

by superpioli on Feb 10, 2012 3:36 PM CST up reply actions