Andrew Luck On the Kansas City Chiefs

Andrew Luck On the Kansas City Chiefs: The Chiefs have all the playmakers in place to be a potent offense for the next decade. They just need an upgrade at quarterback over Matt Cassel. Backup Tyler Palko is clearly not the answer. 2011 5th round pick Ricky Stanzi has the ability to develop into a starter. He is not an immediate answer like Andrew Luck.

The Kansas City Chiefs have been outscored 89 to 10. The Chiefs have allowed the most points in the league and have scored the fewest. Offensive coordinator Charlie Weis is gone. Star running back Jamaal Charles is out for the year, tight end Tony Moeaki is also out for the year, Dwayne Bowe is in a contract year, 2011 first round pick Jonathan Baldwin needs to develop this year, and strong safety Eric Berry who is the Chiefs version of Troy Polamalu is out for the year.

The Chiefs are going to be a lost cause as long as Todd Haley is head coach and as long as Matt Cassel is quarterback. Just finding an upgrade at quarterback to Matt Cassel makes Kansas City a playoff contender in the AFC. Getting a quarterback with Andrew Luck’s skill set can make the Chiefs a Super Bowl contender.

The Chiefs will have Luck and the offensive playmakers on offense allowing them to take an offensive tackle in round 2 for depth who could develop into Luck’s blindside.

Kansas City Chiefs GM Scott Pioli used the 2010 and 2011 NFL Drafts to model a 3-4 defense exactly like the Pittsburgh Steelers 3-4 defense. By the time the Chiefs add Luck they will have a younger version of the 3-4 and could even have the personnel in place to leapfrog the Steelers as the top 3-4 defense in the league with some of Pittsburgh’s players aging on defense.

The Kansas City Chiefs and Andrew Luck are a match made in heaven. Keeping Todd Haley at head coach and Matt Cassel at quarterback makes this team an irrelevant lost cause. Finding a new regime at Head Coach and handing a team with so many Super Bowl pieces in place who just needs a quarterback like Luck makes Kansas City a dynasty team that could end up winning back to back Super Bowls.

8 months ago bfett81 15 comments 2 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Hmmmm.

Kansas City a dynasty team that could end up winning back to back Super Bowls

"Reject a woman, and she will never let it go. One of the many defects of their kind. Also, weak arms."
-Dwight Schrute

by severn58 on Sep 21, 2011 6:22 PM CDT reply actions

yeah right...

more like 3-peat (thats right, i said it Mr. Pat Riley)

by worc on Sep 21, 2011 6:37 PM CDT up reply actions

What happens If we don't get him?

That’s a scary thought.

"Stay Classy Kansas City"

by Mas Cervezas on Sep 21, 2011 7:14 PM CDT via mobile reply actions

It does seem like almost a perfect fit

The most hyped QB since peyton manning comes into an org with a great running game, a very good TE and possible 2-3 very good receivers. Most of these guys come into horrible situations & are swamped.

Predictions:
I'm going to stop predicting positive things

by jmcgoblue on Sep 21, 2011 7:37 PM CDT reply actions

This is fucking stupid.

Nicknames I have coined:

Jamaal Charles = 'Haley's Comet'
Shaun Smith = 'Big Nasty'
Kelly Gregg = 'Old Gregg'

by Nick Britt on Sep 21, 2011 8:01 PM CDT reply actions

Ehh

Seems to perfect to be true.

Funny though how week 17 would look. Imagine Chiefs needing to lose to get the #1 pick and playing Denver. Denver has nothing to for but has a couple more wins. By winning they guarantee having to face Luck 30 times the next 15 years, and the Chiefs win, they lose the #1 pick and Andrew Luck with a new and improved Rookie scale.

That will be a piss poor football game.

by craig in calgary on Sep 21, 2011 8:11 PM CDT reply actions

This is the most uplifting thing I have read in 2 weeks

by KC_Chiefs on Sep 21, 2011 8:56 PM CDT reply actions

Rec'd

The Kansas City Chiefs and Andrew Luck are a match made in heaven

Future QB of your Kansas City Chiefs

by AndrewLuck on Sep 21, 2011 9:20 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs

Who even said that Luck is even going to enter next years draft?

The kid is only a Jr. at Stanford, and he showed that he’s not in it for the money by not coming out last yr. With the season he had, and losing his HC, it would have been an easy decision to make. But he chose to stay, and who knows he may want to stay for his Sr. year too.

So all this “Suck for Luck” talk, is pretty irrevelent right now. It would be stupid for us to lose all those games, and then he not enter the draft. Then who are all of you guys going to want Egoli to pick with the #1 pick in the draft?

We would be better off letting Stanzi start the rest of the season, he could use the experience, and we can see what we actually got in him. An actual starting caliber qb or just another back up.

by ChiefDailyBaked on Sep 21, 2011 9:25 PM CDT reply actions

By that time, Stanzi will be the next Brady

and Luck will be the next Manning. I’ll take Brady and the Super Bowls please

by RamX21 on Sep 21, 2011 10:13 PM CDT up reply actions

He's already graduated

He’s just playing because he is eligible to play, he’d be stupid to not come out this year, there is no reason he won’t come out

by soldierguy38 on Sep 21, 2011 11:15 PM CDT up reply actions

Luck to KC makes too much sense that there is now no way Pioli does it.

Maybe if Luck played for Iowa…

by ChiefsNfl on Sep 21, 2011 10:15 PM CDT reply actions

I think palko should get a full shot as the starter this season.

Honestly, what is there to lose at this point? It is almost statistically impossible for him to be worse than casshole. He is ten times more mobile then cassel, and will def slang the ball downfield. It is way to early to be throwing in the towel, and hopping on the Luck train. We are heading into WEEK 3 people. Anything can happen from here on out. And to be honest, our division is shit. Keep the faith.

by Chef's Kitchen on Sep 21, 2011 10:53 PM CDT reply actions