Kiper article about Luck
Does anybody have ESPN paid access?
Kiper says:
"Forecasting the NFL draft lineup in September is like forecasting the April weather. There just hasn't been enough football played to make any significant conclusions. That said, I must have been asked 10 times this week about who I thought was "in the lead" for Andrew Luck. Everyone seems convinced that if there was a season to go 0-16, this is the one.
It's a crazy thought, because teams simply don't tank their seasons in the NFL. Not only could having a record like that lead to a new coach and a gutted roster for a team that may have already had some promising young talent, but there are also potentially a couple of other legitimate top-five talents at quarterback in this year's draft class.
But when I mentioned it, my editor said it had to be done. So based on the current odds -- as in who currently has the worst shot to make the Super Bowl, and thus the best shot to have the worst record and land the top overall pick -- here's a look at which teams could be in the lead, why, why not, and whether they could pass up on Luck."
8 months ago
kabrink
19 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Did you blindfold ups so he wouldn't see this?
Providing COLOR commentary for Arrowhead Pride! AKA The Picture Diva!
Unfortunately, AP continues to have zero grey area
Either you want the team to go 0-16 or you think Luck will be Ryan Leaf.
I don’t want to lose games, however if the team is positioned to grab Luck whether it be from our draft position, or having to wheel and deal draft pick/players, and NOT take this sure fire prospect, I will mail Scott Pioli human feces.
by craig in calgary on Sep 17, 2011 6:46 PM CDT reply actions
Luck will be good, but Moore will be better, IMO.
This is just me saying that there is no reason to tank the season when a better QB will be available post 1st round.
I like Moore as much as anyone, and I've talked about him for over a year
But he’s not Andrew Luck, there hasn’t been a prospect pimped like this ever before.
I would love to get another young QB next year, hell I’d take one every year till we find a special one.
That said, I strongly believe that Kellen Moore will fly up draft boards when the draft gets close. His accuracy is off the charts and he knows football. Quick release, compact. Only knock on him is his height and that will keep him out of the first round.
Be sure you put your feet in the right place, then stand firm.
-Abraham Lincoln
Moore isn't better, but his hype will continue to grow
Prediction #1: Boise state goes undefeated. Seriously, look at their schedule
Prediction #2: SEC will beat up each other, and Boise will find themselves in the National Championship game
Prediction #3: As a result, Moore will become the sexy pick and the hype will continue to grow
Prediction #4: Someone will reach for him, and he’ll struggle in the NFL.
Unless I’m wrong, in which case, whatever.
by craig in calgary on Sep 17, 2011 7:43 PM CDT up reply actions
I hope prediction #2 is correct
I want playoffs!!!
Prediction #4: Someone will reach for him, and he’ll struggle in the NFL.
Tebow?
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Alameda Ta’amu NT/DE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Sep 18, 2011 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions
Your own, borrowed, or store-bought?
I will mail Scott Pioli human feces.
Top 10 defense and another trip to the playoffs!
Tamba Hali, NFL Sack Leader, 2011
All of the above
craig doesn’t mess around!
I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Alameda Ta’amu NT/DE 2012 Draftee
by BAMFSpecialOps on Sep 18, 2011 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions
sure fire, seems a bit strong
however, so what you’re saying is that you’d be fine if we Ditka’ed the draft and traded every single pick we have to move up and get him if that’s what it took?
CHIEFS DYNASTY – we’re kind of a big deal
Man
if we win tomorrow , I cant wait to start talking about who were going to be taking with the 32nd pick in the draft!!
I eat success for breakfast....with skim milk.
Comment of the month.
Chiefs are either the best team in the history of modern sports, or will never win a game ever again. Nothing in between.
by craig in calgary on Sep 17, 2011 7:01 PM CDT up reply actions
I like your style
"Stay Classy Kansas City"
by Mas Cervezas on Sep 17, 2011 7:41 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
btw here's the rest of the article, sorry in advance for the formatting...
Carolina Panthers
Why they won’t: The Panthers showed a lot in Week 1, and Cam Newton could have an erratic season, but he also has the chance to steal some wins for Carolina. As well, if the defense can stay healthy, they can really slow some teams down.
Why they will: The year of starting a rookie quarterback often comes with plenty of reason for optimism, but not a lot of wins. They also can’t afford further attrition. They’ve lost key talent on the interior of the defensive line, and Jon Beason is done for the year.
Could they pass on Luck? Yes. If Newton continues to grow, it might be better to move the pick for a bounty of picks or talent. Or you draft Luck and open up the market for bidding on your young quarterbacks.
Seattle Seahawks
Why they won’t: The Seahawks have a growing offensive line and a lot of talent on defense, and no team in football seems to have quite the home-field edge Seattle does. They win at least four home games even in years when the team isn’t competitive elsewhere.
Why they will: The quarterback situation looks terrible, and I think the Seahawks erred in not doing more there. The team looks ready to be really competitive if they can get something out of Tarvaris Jackson. But it’s no given.
Could they pass on Luck? No way.
Indianapolis Colts
Why they won’t: We can’t be certain that Peyton Manning is out for the season, and even if he is, the team should improve as the talent already on the roster gets more in sync with Kerry Collins. Remember, the Colts are also breaking in a pair of rookie offensive linemen, so it figured to be a slow start on offense based on their standards, even with Manning.
Why they will: The absence of Manning could be as devastating as we all feared it might be, and the Colts might never recover. Moreover, if Peyton is healthy by, say, Week 10, what’s the use of bringing him back to a 3-7 team?
Could they pass on Luck? Depends on Manning. He’s signed for four more years beyond this one, and perhaps they trade the pick to get some high-level talent or picks they’ve missed on after years of winning.
Denver Broncos
Why they won’t: There’s actually a lot of talent in Denver. The defense looks like it could cause a lot of problems for opposing passers with the addition of Von Miller and a healthy Elvis Dumervil. The offense can score points if the run game becomes consistent.
Why they will: Teams can run on Denver, and it limits the pass-rush talent it has. The quarterback situation already is becoming circus-like, with the calls for Tebow.
Could they pass on Luck? No way. Welcoming the best QB draft prospect since John Elway would purge the organization of any controversies.
Kansas City Chiefs
Why they won’t: There’s actually a lot of young talent here, and I like the way Scott Pioli has built the team, or at least re-stocked the roster. They ran the ball very well last year, and they should be tough at home.
Why they will: Key injuries have hit. Eric Berry is a huge loss, and Tony Moeaki was one exciting target in a passing game that lacks options. Rookie Jonathan Baldwin is talented but has had a bad start, and there are questions about the ceiling of Matt Cassel. They were great in 2010, but this team could fall back to earth.
Could they pass on Luck? No. They have some money committed to Cassel, but they can’t possibly pass on Luck.
Mel Kiper has been the premier name in NFL draft prospect evaluations for more than three decades. He started putting out his annual draft guides in 1978 and started contributing to ESPN as an analyst in 1984. For more from Mel, check out his annual draft publications or his home page. He can also be found on Twitter here.
Seattle with the best homefield advantage
Fuck off
"Stay Classy Kansas City"
by Mas Cervezas on Sep 17, 2011 7:44 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions























