Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: Coverage of the 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing'

OT Open Area for Political Diatribes


Please come here instead of in the football posts so that my freaking blood pressure stays within limits.  Thank you.  rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble  rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble  rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble  rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.

Comment 263 comments  |  5 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Actually I did hear something funny the other day

“Iowa politics are like pre-season football. I don’t watch or give any merit to either.”

Blame my wife!

by sir eccles on Aug 14, 2011 7:09 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

as a lifelong Donkey, I actually watched the speeches in Iowa

this is the most lackluster group (sans Paul) that the republicans put up since well the Democrats vs Bush Jr 2nd time around

by Steve_Chiefs on Aug 14, 2011 7:18 PM CDT reply actions  

Yeah its pretty horrible

All are Establishment NeoCons besides Paul.

Yep, definitely reminds me of the Bush Jr. vs Democrats election the 2nd time around.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 14, 2011 8:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Mobile rec

Well said, kabby

Now either stop with your political ramblings or make another post for just that before my blood boils :-)

I'm so overrated, I'm underrated.

by RememberDelaney37 on Aug 14, 2011 7:56 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

got your rec

just need someone to make it two

by Steve_Chiefs on Aug 14, 2011 9:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

done

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 14, 2011 10:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Amen brother

I’m a big fan of Jesse Ventura. Actually, come to think of it, you sound like Ventura. Jesse, are you a wolf hiding in kabrink’s clothing?

*When we blitz, have the LB's do a KC Strip. Do this in remembrance of DT.
*Dear David Glass, as a lifelong Royals fan, I beg you to please sell the team. You have always been the problem; you will never be the solution.

by mistamic on Aug 14, 2011 8:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

You took the words right out of my mouth.

Or rather, said exactly what I wanted to say but in a much better way. And I think a lot of Americans also feel this way.

"My dad taught me all about the four seasons: Pre-season, regular season, post-season, & off-season"

by chiefschic on Aug 15, 2011 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Big ol rec for you man

Partisan Politics is just a way for them to divide and conquer the masses.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Just vote Ron Paul

He’s the only one on either side of the fictional aisle who actually talks a different message with a record to back it up.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 14, 2011 8:56 PM CDT reply actions  

He seems to be the only one that knows history

Damn, I am tired of repeating it, over and over again

by Steve_Chiefs on Aug 14, 2011 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

History is definitely something he knows a lot of

If only our other Politicians could make that claim.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 14, 2011 9:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

he's still racist

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 14, 2011 10:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

No he's not

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 14, 2011 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Abe Lincoln tried to hold things together

but when they fell apart he seized the chance to make the change we needed.

Sadly, only a 1st termer could and most are too obsessed with a 2nd term to grab that chance they had.

by Steve_Chiefs on Aug 14, 2011 9:36 PM CDT reply actions  

Of course

they’ll never pass it. But what is wrong with term limits? The president already is term limited why can’t everyone else be? In fact, I’d propose:

President – 1 term – 6 years
Senate – 2 terms – 4 years each
House – 2 terms – 2 years each

CHIEFS DYNASTY – we’re kind of a big deal

by kabrink on Aug 14, 2011 10:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

no issues with that

of course, that doesn’t leave much time for them to get in all their goodies from the special interest bribes

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 14, 2011 10:35 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I 100% approve of the purpose of this thread.

I probably won’t read any of it from this point forward, but I love that it exists.

"[Jamaal Charles] probably fights crime in his spare time while inhaling carbon emissions, exhaling oxygen, and crapping oil. That’s how awesome he is. Not just good for the Chiefs, but America."
- MNchiefsfan

by MtHammer on Aug 14, 2011 9:44 PM CDT reply actions  

I doubt it is here tommorrow

But Chiefs fans are also Americans (Here’s to Stanzi) and we can rationally talk about a lot of things. why not this?

by Steve_Chiefs on Aug 14, 2011 10:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

The answer is, of course, that we can.

But I mentioned earlier that the political debates that crop up in unrelated football threads on AP don’t tend to end up being particularly rational or well-informed. Nothing kills or derails a good thread faster in my opinion. I don’t come here for reactionary debates about Obama or the tea party, so my heart sinks when I see a once promising thread erupt into a political “discussion.”

I don’t go to political blogs looking for intelligent football analysis, and the reverse is true for sites like AP. So if we can keep threads like this open for the people who are dying to debate politics with other APers, maybe I won’t have to open any more threads on Jamaal Charles and find comments about how Obama is a Kenyan socialist or how Sarah Palin has the I.Q. of Forrest Gump. And that would be a wonderful thing. Particularly if a thread like this can generate more rational, well-informed, and less reactionary arguments than those that spring up more organically.

"[Jamaal Charles] probably fights crime in his spare time while inhaling carbon emissions, exhaling oxygen, and crapping oil. That’s how awesome he is. Not just good for the Chiefs, but America."
- MNchiefsfan

by MtHammer on Aug 14, 2011 11:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

if only he'd stop insulting Forrest Gump ...

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 14, 2011 11:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

here's an idea to chew on ... some REAL campaign reform

instead of the millions and yes, billions wasted on campaigns and other BS, how about this …

all candidates put out a “position paper” on as many or as few topics as they want

all registered voters get copies of all position papers no less than 3 months in advance of primaries and no less than 3 months in advance of general elections

in any “candidate debate” no candidate shall be allowed to go “off topic” as judged mny an independent panel of forensics students (not paid and unaffiliated with any side) – any candidate who goes off topic shall be silenced for the remainder of the debate and be disqualified for future debates

no candidate shall spend money for any advertising of any kind … any advertising by or on behalf of any candidate shall disqualify that candidate from office

in short, tell us where you stand and let us figure it out … if we, the people, can’t do that we have no business voting to begin with

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 14, 2011 10:42 PM CDT reply actions  

politics is a cycle with a lot of money being paid to all types of industries

Media for one.

My thought as stated above, If you are the President of the United States (hell or high water) take charge.

Somewhere along the way we let the House start mandating the programs, the house is filled with wannabee’s and never were’s.

Quit worrying about re-election and do something worth gettng re-elected for.

Sorta like Tyson Jackson and Matt Cassel, put up or shut up time is here in 2011

by Steve_Chiefs on Aug 14, 2011 10:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

well, that's the problem, Steve ... it's all about money

politics is money … pure and simple

“best government money can buy” is more true than anyone thinks

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 14, 2011 10:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Money controls the world

Doesn’t help that a bank controls our money supply

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 14, 2011 11:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

oh, now you're catching on!

money is controlled by a bank … BY DEFAULT

what do you think is the reason banks exist in the first place?

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 14, 2011 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Banks were originally loan sharks

They didn’t own money, the government did.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 14, 2011 11:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

very good ...

now, get past ancient history and the middle ages and focus on the Fed … what is its purpose, how was it created and why? what does it do?

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 14, 2011 11:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's easy

Its purpose is to be a tool for the Banks,.

It was created on Jekyll Island off the coast of Georgia by a group of Elite and very Wealth bankers, and was passed on Dec. 23rd 1913 when only a few Congressmen were present.

Mainly the Fed is controlled by the major banking institutions, Citigroup owns the most stock and unshockingly got the most money come bailout time. It allows banks to be irresponsible, setting ridiculously low interest rates(I think its 0 now), and it only tells banks to hold 20%? of its money which is very risky. But its all okay because if you fail, instead of letting nature run its course they’ll bail you out. It controls monetary policy, printing worthless paper when it needs to pay bills, but also “stimulating” the economy when needed by, you guessed it, printing some more money. In consequence it devalues currency by doing this, making our money worthless with time. It creates business cycles as well, or boom and bust cycles, a bubble is formed then its popped repeat ad infinitum.

Hmmm can’t think of anything else, oh yeah they don’t get audited so we don’t really know where a lot of our money that we’re printing is going. A recent half-audit found that a lot of money went to foreign banks.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 15, 2011 12:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

well done!

now, take that to its logical conclusion … and remember, it’s all about the money

so, money is controlled by a very few … the purpose of money is to generate more money (we call that inflation) … money is used to control others, including goveernments, and to persuade governments and elected leaders …

carry on, finish it up … you can do it

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 12:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

"Give me control of a Nation's money supply, and I care not who makes its laws" - Amschel Rothschild

Those who create the money, control those who use it.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 15, 2011 12:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

precisely

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 1:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Works for me..

Profile Image courtesy of 'christoffer'..

by chiefsfan62 on Aug 14, 2011 11:55 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

C'mon people, get a clue, both parties represent the international bankers.

Americans are so caught up in “end of the republic” activities that we have lost all discernment. We must be more sophisticated in our analysis and resist the new world order. Watching people participate(STILL) in the political duality is making me lose faith in humanity. I wanna watch my Chiefs kick ass, not watch the economy collapse! Pull yourselves out of the illusion! Ron Paul is where to start!!

Go Chiefs

by Iowa_KC on Aug 14, 2011 11:36 PM CDT reply actions  

can Ron Paul play the LT position?

if so then Pioli can move Albert back to his natural position of …

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 14, 2011 11:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hail to the Chiefs

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 14, 2011 11:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rediculous

But that is where we are in America, a nation of relativistic smart asses with nothing to contribute.
The fed is one of the main problems.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6507136891691870450

by Iowa_KC on Aug 14, 2011 11:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

I know what it is and what it does ...

and I’m attempting to educate one of our younger Anarchistic bloggers

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 14, 2011 11:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

I actually already know about the Fed

I’m a Ron Paul supporter so its basically mandatory to educate oneself about it.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 15, 2011 12:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

but what Ron Paul DOESN"T (and won't) tell is that he's every bit a part of that same institution that's perpetrated all this for years

he’s part of the same establishment: totally and completely … don’t ever kid yourself that he’s some “enlightened savior”

he’s a businessman, first and foremost …

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 12:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

Then why doesn't he garner the same support from big business and the establishment that NeoCons do?

If he was truly about the Establishment, then he would be set for life. The Establishment would have welcomed RP and his views with open arms.

The fact is Big Business hates Ron Paul, and Bernanke despises him. Media especially tries to steer as far away from him as humanly possible, and when he has to be mentioned they belittle him as much as they can. His biggest supporters are the armed forces, and individual donations make up 90% of his campaign money.

Now we can say that this is all a sham, that there is a very big conspiracy going on to get him elected and this was planned from the beginning. And trust me I thought the same way originally, I was a full on Obama supporter in 2008 so trust me I’ve been taken in before. But the man has been saying the same thing for 30 damn years, and honestly I can’t believe its a hoax. RP doesn’t even want to get elected, if you saw the last debate he was happy as hell that Gingrich mentioned the Federal Reserve. The man is just happy that his ideas are reaching people, that people will come to listen to what he has to say and are educating themselves on the world and their government.

At this point Obama is getting us no where, he’s Bush 2.0 in just about everything he does, and nobody is saying a different message besides RP. Only this time RP actually has plenty of proof, a whole voting record to go by.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 15, 2011 12:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Wow, I've just had an idea

I’m off to register thedonkey.com and theelephant.com then get them signed up to SBnation.

Blame my wife!

by sir eccles on Aug 15, 2011 1:26 AM CDT reply actions  

Would be a good idea

We need multiple sides to this issue answered!

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 15, 2011 1:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

yeah ...

RT or LT? which side does Albert REALLY come down on? ;-)

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 1:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks for the discussion Ups

Was a very productive night, hope there are no hard feelings. I always enjoy thoughtful discussion. :-)

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 15, 2011 1:57 AM CDT reply actions  

enjoyed it, young man ...

and I think you MAY have learned a little something tonight as evidenced by your response above a few minutes ago …

remember that there are a myriad of complex things going on all at once … nothing is ever “that simple” when it comes to dealing with “national and world politics” and “economics”

remember too: people are always more important than money … make that a guiding principle in your life and your learnings and your leanings and you’ll never go wrong :-)

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 2:03 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Life over money is always my philosophy

Violence only breeds more violence in this world, and war never solves the question about who is right, only who is left.

You presented a good challenge, and I’m glad to have met you, getting more insight on the world is always a great thing. People are way to close-minded, and when they hear something outside their comfort zone they become way to reactionary. My family is a testament to this fact. :D

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 15, 2011 2:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

Politics....lets examine the word shall we?

Poli – As a prefix, often meaning more than one or many
Tics – Tics (ticks) are ectoparasites (external parasites), living by hematophagy on the blood of mammals, birds, and occasionally reptiles and amphibians.

More than one or many external parasites living by the blood of others….describes politicans to a tee IMO!

by DivineGrace on Aug 15, 2011 3:47 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

and duly rec'd

even if you had to stretch it on the second part ;-)

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 11:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Boom...

First of all, you throwin' too many big words at me, and because I don't understand them, I'm gonna take 'em as disrespect...

by SFLChief on Aug 15, 2011 6:03 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

MOAR BRAWNDO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -Gandhi.

by Sudden on Aug 15, 2011 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Wow, so many partisan blinders being worn, it's near impossible to figure out where to begin

The Chiefs and I have mutually agreed on this decision and although I look forward to continuing my career, I’ll always have a special place in my heart for Kansas City.

by TRSChief on Aug 15, 2011 7:51 AM CDT reply actions  

Fuxk Obama this socialist movement

And the “everyone gets a trophy generation”

"Stay Classy Kansas City"

by Mas Cervezas on Aug 15, 2011 10:18 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

I agree that making every kid feel like a winner, when they are clearly losers is doing more harm than good...

but what socialist movement? the one that we have been living in since FDR…the one that most Americans love… “Don’t touch my Medicare…Don’t touch my SS”…Most of the people that complain about socialism love socialism, they just don’t know what it means…

First of all, you throwin' too many big words at me, and because I don't understand them, I'm gonna take 'em as disrespect...

by SFLChief on Aug 15, 2011 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Everyone gets a fair share -

Living off the gov for welfare checks. The whole Obamacare that required you have insurance or you get a penalty: people don’t have insurance because they can’t get a job. People can’t get a job because they don’t want to work for it- or the job is outsourced- or they are too ignorant-stupid-lazy to try to join the military

"Stay Classy Kansas City"

by Mas Cervezas on Aug 15, 2011 10:51 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

People can’t get a job because they don’t want to work for it- or the job is outsourced- or they are too ignorant-stupid-lazy to try to join the military

1) I’m out of a job partly because the field (education) has been downsized … as for wanting to work, well yeah, I do want to work … got a job handy for me? would it shock you know that for every job I apply for there are 100 applicants? and that’s not JUST for jobs in education, and yeah, I’ve applied for jobs in other things as well

why are there so many fewer jobs than before? you hit on PART of it …

2) outsoucing … our dear corporate and business friends who continue to want more and more control and the freedom to do whatever they damn well please have made sure that jobs go overseas to the cheapest labor possible, while profits stay in the hands of the elite and go thru off-shore bank accounts

3) sorry dude, I’m too old for the military … that doesn’t mean I’m ignorant, or stupid, or lazy … I’m none of those and yeah, I get tired of the right wing BS that lumps everyone in the same category

please stop with the fringe element hate, it’s not at all becoming for civil discourse and doesn’t solve a thing

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

1. Your story resonates with me. My fiancee is a teacher and, especially in California, which is a state that has suffered severe swings in revenue collection (largely a result of a progressive tax structure that collects revenue disproportionately from the top earners, which is always a deeply fluctuating income in troubled times), there have been numerous scares over pink slipping. Of course, it frustrates me to no end that, due to the union structure of public K-12 ed, when the time comes for cuts, they are required to cut the newest hires, which means they have to cut twice the number as they would is they were to cut the highest salaries (and in some cases, those that have been around longest have lost their passion and ability to truly reach kids). That is a disservice to the kids, and flies in teh face of the union’s own contentions about class size importance. I don’t entirely begrudge the union, they are supposed to represent the interests of their members, not the interests of their consumers. I just wish they were more honest and said that they lobby for teachers interests, not necessarily students interests, although there may be areas where the two overlap.

2. Outsourcing is a largely a problem of the cost of business, not the cost of labor. Having items manufactured or handled across the pacific ocean for consumption in the Eastern Seaboard imposes significant costs. However, due to labor costs, costs of fringe benefits (namely health care), and regulatory compliance, many business have found it more profitable to manufacture overseas. We can increase out own competitiveness by reducing the costs of business at home through regulatory easing, reforms that will reduce healthcare costs (of which I generally support overall market based reforms and delinking the employer as healthcare provider, after all, how cruel and inhumane is it that when a person loses a job, their most vulnerable time, they also lose healthcare).

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -Gandhi.

by Sudden on Aug 15, 2011 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

you know that in a lot of states, including Cali, the veteran teachers were bought out for early retirement

… in other words, some of the best and most knowledgable were “put out to pasture” as a buget cutting measure

now there are literally thousands and thousands of teachers who, like me, are too young to retire and too old to start over … and getting a job in another field is often impossible as well (prejudices about age are rampant still) and of course anyone out of a job more than a few months is unwanted as well

yup, it’s a mess out there … and your point about healthcare and those who need it the most: well, that’s where my point comes in on SS and medicare/Medicaid … all of which the “business siders” want to see privatized, which would lead to more profits in the hands of a few and everyone else totally screwed

yanno, Obama’s healthcare coverage plan wasn’t/isn’t perfect … but pretty much anything beats giving control to private business, IMO

again, well said, Sir

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 12:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Regarding the SS/Medicare thing, I understand

That’s why I’m fully in the means-testing camp. Most of the reforms contemplated at present are tinkering with retirement and collection ages. I actually want to lower the retirement age. I know first hand how difficult it is to find employment in your fifties, I saw my dad go through a prolonged unemployment in his late 50’s. Businesses don’t like hiring such people because of higher healthcare costs, less technological savvy, and a multitude of other factors. Beyond that, a guy who makes his living busting his ass in physical skilled labor (think carpenter, AC installer, plumber etc) has physical limitations to his ability to continue working into his late 60’s early 70’s, and that is the guy that’s never made a killing in his life. He should be able to at 62-65. But ferrchissakes, the lawyer that’s raked in an average annual earnings in excess of $150k should have been able to save sufficiently his lifetime to not qualify to rob some 17 year old working at the local Arby’s.
(moreover, I believe the means testing should be based on average annual lifetime earnings, not net worth. Modest earners who scrimped and saved their whole lives shouldn’t be penalized for prudent personal financial decisions).

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -Gandhi.

by Sudden on Aug 15, 2011 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

yup, a lot of factors involved ...

hell, I’d love to work til I’m 70 or 75 or as long as I can … give me a job and get the hell outta my way and I’ll do it, and do it well

I have a lot of skills and abilities, but … ahhh, not gonna whine about it, thanks for the understanding, etc

call me Dad ;-)

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Noted

I am definetley not good at conveying my point when it comes to politics. I will tell this is one he’ll of a mess we are in these days. Really scary times. And your not to old brother- your just over qualified :)

"Stay Classy Kansas City"

by Mas Cervezas on Aug 15, 2011 5:38 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

LOL ... over qualified, thank you, MC

yup, a huge mess … and really, we owe it all to Congress, both sides of the aisle

’scuse me while I bury some qualifications ;-)

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 16, 2011 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

healthcare

should be privatized in order to get competition into the system. Actual real competition would cause service to go up and costs to go down. This is not to say there should be no regulations. My simplified example here.
 
Federal government should set minimum coverage requirements that all plans must provide for. Also, just like car insurance, everyone should be required to by healthcare insurance. People would be allowed to change plans often (monthly? quarterly?) so that they can always shop for best product for them. People could not be refused coverage due to existing conditions although fees should be allowed to vary by risk. Income levels would be set that would receive full or partial funding on the low income side and no funding on the high end side. Beyond the basic minimum plan you could always opt for higher options.

All of this would mean that everyone is at least getting the same minimum coverage but could also opt for more if they wish to pay. In the end, the individual should be choosing what is best or too much for themselves, not the government.

CHIEFS DYNASTY – we’re kind of a big deal

by kabrink on Aug 16, 2011 11:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

IMO Obama pussed out on his healthcare plan...

letting it get watered down and not offering a public option…

First of all, you throwin' too many big words at me, and because I don't understand them, I'm gonna take 'em as disrespect...

by SFLChief on Aug 15, 2011 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

It didn't have the votes with a public option included.

He didn’t puss out, he got what he could get through at a time when opposition to his plan was at a fever pitch. Now, the ‘pubs were idiots and were trying to scare up opposition by mentioning Medicare cuts (PPACA included $250bn in cuts to doctor reimbursement, Medicare currently under-reimburses to the tune of around 25%, Medicaid under-reimburses significantly worse than that… next time you’re wondering why your healthcare bill is so high, realize that the doctor/hospital is charging you more to make up for the lack of full reimbursement it gets from Medicare/Medicaid patients). Of course, congress later passed the doc fix, reapplying that money back, but they kept the cut in the bill in order to achieve the illusion of revenue neutral (eventhough the revenue collection provisions began within two years of passage, but the bulk of spending provisions didn’t occur until six years after passage). The president gamed the CBO’s economic impact analysis, knowing how the CBO was required to score a bill. In congressional testimony, CBO head Doug Elmendorff was very clear that the CBO was restricted to analyzing the bill as written and only within the 10 year budget window. He mentioned that certain factors, such as the doc fix which was politically going to happen, could not be considered due to not being language within the bill. He also stated that the cost/revenue analysis included would not apply beyond the 10 year budget window due to the disparity in when revenues kicked in vs when spending kicked in.

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -Gandhi.

by Sudden on Aug 15, 2011 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

public option is stupid

The claims are that a public option means 300 million people would drive down the price of things by negotiating power. Just doesn’t work that way. And, if that doesn’t work good enough, government price controls will follow. This would of course ultimately cause companies not to spend money inventing new treatments.

Also, if you as an individual feel like any treatment is free to you, then there is no limit to what you will ask for – you will just treat and treat and treat yourself. So, to prevent runaway treatment costs, the government has to decide how to limit your treatments – hence “death panels” otherwise the system would be bankrupt the day after it opened for business.

CHIEFS DYNASTY – we’re kind of a big deal

by kabrink on Aug 17, 2011 12:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

companies won't stop inventing new treatments...that is the stupidest argument out there...

if there is money to be made they will continue (just not profiting as much)…It’s like saying if you tax people that make over $1 million at 40% instead of 35% those people would stop earning over $1 a year because of the tax bracket, not gonna happen…

and the argument that you will keep going to the Dr. because it’s free is also BS…I pay over $400 a month for insurance and I haven’t seen the Doc in 1 1/2…i would think if you are paying an arm and a leg for insurance that you would go more than if it were free, to get your money’s worth…

Medicare for all please…I would rather pay into a gov run system that is not run “for profit”…I feel that it is digusting that companies make profits by denying benefits to people that pay insurance for years because it hurts the companies bottom line..

.“death Panel” is just retarded political marketing like “death Tax” and “patriot act”

First of all, you throwin' too many big words at me, and because I don't understand them, I'm gonna take 'em as disrespect...

by SFLChief on Aug 17, 2011 8:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

As people are realizing Obama is nothing more than an empty Suit

Hope is a nice thought but it’s no substitute for a comprehensive plan.
Obama has lots of hope and no plans (empty suit)
He relies on others to come up with plans he just wants to say okay or no. He has no vision.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

oh? and just who do you see out thee who DOES have "vision"

more to the point, what kind of vision is it?

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not that I would vote for him, but Newt Gingrich

Palin, Bachmann are just empty suits (or skirts). I work hard, bla bla bla. F^ck that. Tell me what youre plan is to get the economy moving. To create jobs. To keep our nation safe, etc………..

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

curious here, grid ...

do me a favor and answer the following 3 questions with what YOU think “national” policy should be … not what your personal preference is, because I could care less about YOUR personal preference

rather I’m looking for your feelings on what NATIONAL (meaning everyone and anyone) should be allowed to do in ther own personal life

and no comments, please … not yet … you’ll have a chance for comment and or rebuttal soon, right now just FOR or AGAINST

1) National legalization of gay marriage

2) National decriminalization and/or legalization of marijuana

3) National legalization and/or non-interference with abortion (1st trimester only)

just copy/paste the questions and then your answers … that’s it … easy as 1, 2, 3

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

1. I believe in the freedom of contract and association. Gay Marriage, polygamy, and incestual marriages (though I can see arguments against that for public health reasons). But gay marriage and polygamy. As long as two consenting adults wish to enter into a contract, it should be perfectly legal and recognized by the state. That said, I don’t think any private institution should be forced to recognize such. If a catholic run hospital (not receiving federal funds) wishes to deny spousal visit, that’s their call (but they won’t be receiving my business or donations).

2. I support decriminalization of all controlled substances.

3. I support a federalism where abortion is concerned. I recognize that matters of where life begins are not cut and dry and different areas have different general views. I also recognize that if life does begin in the first trimester, protection of life is a central tenet worthy of upholding. Let the individual states chose how the legislate the activity, and let the residents of the states vote with their feet.

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -Gandhi.

by Sudden on Aug 15, 2011 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

on #3 ... does that include cases of incest/rape?

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Again, federalism there.

States should be able to decide how they wish to legislate abortion. If I disagree with it intensely, I’ll move out.

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -Gandhi.

by Sudden on Aug 15, 2011 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

1. It’s semantics, but I’m for legalized unions, but against marriage. I believe Nationally that gay couples should have certain rights that currently only married couples have. For me the term “Marriage” has a religious connotation.

2. I wouldn’t mind seeing it become a controlled substance and seeing the gov. tax the shit out it, the way they do tobacco.

3. It already is legal. I would not move to make it illegal. Nor do I think we should publicly fund it.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

fair enough, thank you

and note that I have no issues with any of your responses

disappointed in me?

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

left?

communist!

yah, most people vote with their wallet … most people don’t even know the real issues at depth, much less possible solutions, never mind who’s running (esp at local level)

average voter goes into voting booth, pulls curtain closed and thinks: am I as good or better off now as I was 4 yrs ago? (simplistically)

if so, vote for incumbant … if not, vote for the other guy

this is how Ronald Reagan was elected on a promise to “balance the buget” by raising spending (defense) and cutting income (taxes) … anyone who can balance a checkbook knows that such a promise is unattainable, but promise it he did and believe it they did, cloaked in poli-speak and wrapped in the red, white and blue

and ketchup is a vegetable

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agree most people don't know the issues

Sometimes I think there should be a competency test before people are allowed to vote.
It truly is amazing how many people don’t even bother to vote in local elections. They can impact their lives even more than national elections.
As for Reagan, balancing the budget, well he sure wasn’t too successful at that. However, lowering taxes and balancing the budget is attainable.
There are 3 legs to process improvement.
1.Better
2.Faster
3.Cheaper
Many think you have to sacrifice one to improve the other two. (take your pick)
I have found it is possible to achieve all 3 at the same time.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

better, faster, cheaper ... sounds like Fast Food except for #1

seriously, my only problem with giving free reign to businesses is that it leads to disaster down the road … sure I understand about profits, and abou risks, etc

I know about overhead and all the good accounting things … no, my issue is that business, when left to its own, will do whatever is needed to succeed in the name of the almighty dollar and screw anyone or anything else, including the planet that the business must, of necessity, rely upon

I have no problems with the Mom n Pop shops or the small businessman, but the corporations and their greed represent the worst of it

people, not money, should always come first

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

And giving the government the reins on business

Somehow doesn’t lead to ruin down the road?

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 17, 2011 12:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm fine with those

Number three is very nuanced. First I am for pro choice. However, I also think the policy should rightly be set by congress not by the court. However, I don’t think that’ll ever happen. But, if it did, I would prefer something like:
1) rape or health of woman – no time limitation
2) other wise limited to 3rd or 4th month (whatever makes sense) – because if you get accidentally pregnant that seems like more than enough to to find out and to decide either way – and to learn to simply be responsible in the future by using birth control of some sort

I simply don’t understand why so many on the left hates things like eating animals or testing shampoo on animals but think it’s ok to kill as many babies as possible right when their head is starting to poke out.

CHIEFS DYNASTY – we’re kind of a big deal

by kabrink on Aug 17, 2011 12:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

Obama is not a Socialist at all

He is a NeoCon though

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 15, 2011 7:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'll throw in my two cents.

I’m a libertarian, tried and true. Voted for Harry Brown twice, Bob Barr last cycle (Ron Paul in the primaries though), and will vote for Paul and continue donating to him and his son Rand. Paul’s big issues are international relations and the Fed. Although I agree with his stances on both, my big issue is spending and entitlement reform.

Some simple facts, we could annex every dollar in income earned in excess of $250k and still not have enough to cover this year’s deficit (and by annexing all that money, the impact upon the following year’s GDP and revenue collection would be profound). Defense, SS, and Medicare/Medicaid comprise close to 75% of total federal spending. If one wishes to continue these programs as presently structured, it requires large scale tax increases across all classes and income brackets of Americans.

My ideal would be significant immediate reductions to the department of defense. An interesting thing to note for the Dems and Obama supporters here: Obama’s ten year budget proposal had the Defense Department growing to over $1 trillion, while Rep. Paul Ryan’s ten year proposal had the DoD under $900bn.

But if we are serious about getting the fiscal house in order, SS and Medicare/Medicaid need to be addressed. I support means testing. It is outright absurd that I, who make a modest income and barely scrape by, should be paying 12% of my income to a transfer payment that Warren Buffet is collecting. That isn’t just insane and counterproductive, it is vastly immoral.

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -Gandhi.

by Sudden on Aug 15, 2011 12:01 PM CDT reply actions  

Sudden, thank you for your lucid comment ... very enlightening

not that I necessarily agree with it all, btw …

you’re working and barely scraping by, I’m out of a job so you have a clue what I’m doing … but think about what happens to those who do depend on SS or Medicare/Medicaid if it’s stopped

sure, we should be working on alternatives, but look at what private business does to investments when left to their own vices … thousands and thousands have lost their investments for retirement thru the actions of companies like Enron, and yet people simply say “well gee, that’s too bad” … so, throw people under the bus because someone else stole from them? maybe let’s push them under … or should we resource them and turn them all into Soylent Green?

solutions are never simple, you’re intelligent and know that as well as I do … solutions are as complex as the problems themselves … and we have the most complex problems ever

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

SS was a self supporting system, until our Government started raiding it for other give away programs. Medicare and Medicaid are replacements for medical benefits retiree’s use to get from corporations. Socialism says everyone should have the same benefit.

People should be free to make their own choices and reap the rewards or suffer the consequences of their decisions. Should we feel sorry for someone who lost everything from Enron. Sure. Should we make them whole. F^ck no. If someone made the choice to put all their eggs in one basket, it’s not my fault they all got broken and I shouldn’t be forced by a government to subsidize a persons bad decision. You think they would share the wealth if Enron had made them Millions? F^ck No. And they shouldn’t. They took the risk they should get the reward.
With that mode of thinking we should all just put our money in the highest risk/reward venture we can find and if it fails, no problem…….Hey govment bail me out.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

spoken like a true money-grubbing businessman ... well done, you heartless bastid ;-)
Should we feel sorry for someone who lost everything from Enron. Sure. Should we make them whole. F^ck no.

you know, it wouldn’t be quite as hard to take if there were SOME measure of justice from the actions of jeffrey Skilling and his ilk … when you don’t have many eggs to begin with, it’s hard NOT to put them in one basket … andwhen the person carrying that basket runs off with your eggs and sells them to someone else, and then steals them back again … lather, rinse, repeat

sure, let private business do whatever they want and screw everyone else … riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

No. I never said let business do what they want.

There should be consequence for illegal activity. I’m not familiar with the details of Enron, but they did give Ebbers what he deserved and gave Maddoff what he deserved.
But punishing the guilty does not mean the tax payers need to bail out the foolish investor.
I lost money from WorldCom. But I wasn’t stupid enough to have all my eggs in one basket and I didn’t go crying to the government to help me because I lost money.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes I'm a money grubbing heartless bastard

We should all live by the Ferengi Rules of Acquisition…………..

218. Always know what you’re buying.
     8. Small print leads to large risk.
     1. Once you have their money … never give it back.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

you have funny looking ears

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

thank you!

what do you think … is the color ok? is it me?

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

thank you ... I'll look for something more suitable :-)

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

social security at first

was never intended to cover everybody like it does today. It was intended as an actual safety net for only those that actually needed it. Now it is nothing more than a legalized ponzi scheme that can never work due to demographic problems, inflation, lack of good investment, and raids by the congress. Funny everyone hates Madoff but the feds are doing the same thing.

CHIEFS DYNASTY – we’re kind of a big deal

by kabrink on Aug 17, 2011 12:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

some companies including enron

made their employees put all their funds in company stock and also didn’t allow them to take it out.

CHIEFS DYNASTY – we’re kind of a big deal

by kabrink on Aug 17, 2011 12:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

mmmm, I love Soylent Green - yummy stuff

CHIEFS DYNASTY – we’re kind of a big deal

by kabrink on Aug 17, 2011 12:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

contrary to what you think

most people in business are fine with reasonable regulations of their respective industry. Some people, but very, very few to none in my own experience think NO regulations is a realistic and workable solution to anything.

CHIEFS DYNASTY – we’re kind of a big deal

by kabrink on Aug 17, 2011 12:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Of Course

Big businesses don’t want regulations, because then they’d actually have to compete.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 21, 2011 7:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

I could vote for Ron Paul...

First of all, you throwin' too many big words at me, and because I don't understand them, I'm gonna take 'em as disrespect...

by SFLChief on Aug 15, 2011 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

but his son Rand is an idiot...

Ron actually believes what he says, and says what he believes…Rand is libertarian by association…

First of all, you throwin' too many big words at me, and because I don't understand them, I'm gonna take 'em as disrespect...

by SFLChief on Aug 15, 2011 12:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

If Rand were not a true libertarian, and instead merely a politician claiming the mantle,

I sincerely doubt he would have offered a full throated defense of repealing the public accomodations provisions of the CRA on Rachel Maddow’s show. That is a massive political loser, and opens one up the most damning attack of being a racist (admittedly, that general attack leveled as an ad hominem is often the provence of a losing argument).

Rand is his father’s son. He might prioritize the issues differently (whereas Ron speaks about international affairs and the fed most frequently, it seems Rand is focused on spending and debt). But they share agreement across the broad range of the issues.

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -Gandhi.

by Sudden on Aug 15, 2011 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Here is a qoute from Rand...it doesn't sound libertarian to me...
I’m not for profiling people on the color of their skin, or on their religion, but I would take into account where they’ve been traveling and perhaps, you might have to indirectly take into account whether or not they’ve been going to radical political speeches by religious leaders. It wouldn’t be that they are Islamic. But if someone is attending speeches from someone who is promoting the violent overthrow of our government, that’s really an offense that we should be going after — they should be deported or put in prison.

First of all, you throwin' too many big words at me, and because I don't understand them, I'm gonna take 'em as disrespect...

by SFLChief on Aug 15, 2011 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

free speech goes out the window?

talk about preserving the status quo …

sounds much like what the King of England said about Colonists before the American Revolution

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

And he clarified on WHAL the following day:
It is against the law to promote the violent overthrow of the U.S. government. It’s against the law to promote violence against the president. We put people in jail for promoting violence through words against the president…and…for promoting violent overthrow….That’s not a protected form of speech….

I was talking about what you would use…in order to target and in order to get a warrant….What I don’t want is the PATRIOT Act trolling through everyone’s records and saying if you go to a political speech or a political rally I disagree with, we’re going to throw you out of the country….

Let’s say that the police or the FBI or the CIA is investigating a group in Pakistan, and that group in Pakistan has made 25 phone calls to somebody in the United States. That to me is a warning sign, and probably enough to get a warrant. Say they also find that person is going to a radical Islamicist who is promoting the violent overthrow [of the U.S. government] and promoting the planting of IEDs to kill our soldiers. I think that is another warning sign that that person is a potential terrorist. Then I think you go to a judge and ask for a warrant.

The ultimate result could be deportation. We also have a lower standard for deportation than we do for…U.S. citizens. U.S. citizens cannot be kicked out of the country. But if you’re visiting…here on a student visa, you have to report periodically to the authorities where you are, that you’re in school; you can be deported if you’re not in school when you said you were in school….Sixteen of the 19 hijackers were here on a student visa; they should have been deported because they were not following the rules….

All I’m saying is that attending a rally where you call for the violent overthrow of the United States—one, it’s against the law to say that, but attending the rally would be supportive evidence for a judge.

Now, he’s still wrong. Brandenberg v Ohio actually said the govt cannot criminalize advocating the violent overthrow of the Federal Government. But that said, he’s actually been consistent about his opposition to the deceivingly named PATRIOT act, moreso than can be said for the present occupant of the White House who claimed opposition, but once in power sought its extention. He played a lot of self described liberals and civil libertarians like a cheap Chinese made toy.

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -Gandhi.

by Sudden on Aug 15, 2011 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh yeah...i love when politician give names like "Patriot Act"...

It is funny how the dems kept it around once the came into power, after running against it…similar to the wars that we are still waging…

First of all, you throwin' too many big words at me, and because I don't understand them, I'm gonna take 'em as disrespect...

by SFLChief on Aug 15, 2011 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

agreed ... talk about intrusive

Bush should have been impeached just for that one, along with everyone in the Congress

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't like it one bit ...

honestly, Obama is more to the right than I’d like … he’s “sold out” as they all have

then too, a President is only as good (or bad) as the Congress he has to work with … as noted elsewhere on this thread: the President can set the tone and veto a bill, but the Congress passes the bills to begin with, and the Bational Budget (spending) begins in the House (our dear friend Boehner)

that said, I’d like to know where all the voices of horror that are now raging against Obama were when Bush was in office? why was there no outcry when spending rose and rose with Bush at the helm of the ship? why were there no rants and rages when the National Debt increased year afer year under Dubya? why was it “ok” then but suddenly “not ok” now?

again, it goes back to “politics” … Dems and Reps being two sides of the same coin … the “loyal opposition” across the aisle … nearly every one of them liars, crooks and thieves

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

True I didn't hear a lot about Bush spending when it happened

But I have heard plenty of criticism about it since he left office. Even the right wing complains about it now.

I don’t know the exact numbers, but I think a lot of the Bush increase was in the name of “Homeland Security” and National Defense (Wars). I think this is why he got a pass at the time from the 99.9% of the population that didn’t think it was a conspiracy. (and please don’t re-hash it).

Obama on the other hand had 2 years with no opposition to do anything he damn well pleased. You despise big business, but look at all the bailouts Obama and the Dems facilitated. Look at the Trillion Dollar spending plan that was suppose to create jobs. You should know first hand how well that went. The Government can’t run SS or MC, and they voted in Trillions of cost for Obama Care. And I’m not partisan about the issue. It was bad when Romney did it in Mass as well. What a concept for our gov. take a failed plan and nationalize it.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

oh, absolutely!!! increased spending there AND lower taxes (esp for the wealthy) = higher deficit (duh!)
a lot of the Bush increase was in the name of "Homeland Security" and National Defense (Wars)

the bailouts? you know, I wish every one of those bankers adn Wall Streeters had gone to jail, directly to jail … or Afghanistan, maybe … every last one should have lost everything they owned (and if the Republicans are so fond of this inheritance thing, then by all rights their relatives should have lost everything they owned, too … sons, daughters all in the poorhouse or jail … why not? why shouldn’t THAT work both ways, too?)

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was just trying to answer your question
I’d like to know where all the voices of horror that are now raging against Obama were when Bush was in office? why was there no outcry when spending rose and rose with Bush at the helm of the ship? why were there no rants and rages when the National Debt increased year afer year under Dubya? why was it "ok" then but suddenly "not ok" now?

I think the majority of the people consider Obama’s spending as unnecessary and at the time did not view Bush’s spending in that light. Not to mention the Bush spending was nowhere near the level of Obama’s.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 3:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

the recession we now have is thanks to dems

For years and years they denigrated banks for not lending money to the poor people they see as their constituents. The banks never used to want to lend money to people that couldn’t afford it but finally buckled under. They still didn’t want the risk so they invented ways to give out mortgages but then to shuffle off the risk to someone else.

Housing caused this recession and is still the reason we can’t get out of it. Barney Frank is the most guilty party in this. The republicans were trying to restrain or even shut down Freddie and Fannie in early 2000s but were prevented.

CHIEFS DYNASTY – we’re kind of a big deal

by kabrink on Aug 17, 2011 12:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well the Fed is the real cause

They’re the ones who actually created the housing bubble to begin with. And both sides of the Aisle are pro-centralized banking except for a select few.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 17, 2011 12:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

true they had a huge hand as well

making almost free money

CHIEFS DYNASTY – we’re kind of a big deal

by kabrink on Aug 17, 2011 12:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Almost free?

No,no,no,no,no.

Money they print, that doesn’t exist and that isn’t paid for, is never free. Because the private citizen feels less weight in their pocket as the dollar loses its value.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 17, 2011 1:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

what?

Bush had more hatred and venom spewed against him than any president I’ve ever seen.

CHIEFS DYNASTY – we’re kind of a big deal

by kabrink on Aug 17, 2011 12:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

Which is weird

Because Obama is doing pretty much the same exact things as Bush was.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 17, 2011 12:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

except the entire press industry is in love with him

He is never criticized or even questioned by the vast majority of the press.

CHIEFS DYNASTY – we’re kind of a big deal

by kabrink on Aug 17, 2011 12:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

He can do no wrong

Besides all the wrong that he do do

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 17, 2011 12:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

omg, they're MUSLIM ... RUN! HIDE!

I’m so sick of blind prejudices …

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 1:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

omg!

what have you done to Al Davis! he looks like a new man! ;-)

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 3:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

do you feel the same about christians?

CHIEFS DYNASTY – we’re kind of a big deal

by kabrink on Aug 17, 2011 12:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Again he doesn't seem to be much of a libertarian...

http://www.lpky.org/node/159

First of all, you throwin' too many big words at me, and because I don't understand them, I'm gonna take 'em as disrespect...

by SFLChief on Aug 15, 2011 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

tired of the endless racist charges

Democrats love it because they don’t have to defend their point. Just pull out the racist charge. In my mind, democrat party ARE the racists. 1)Affirmative action is legalized racism. Hiring someone because they are black instead of white is wrong. The real solution is to make sure that everyone gets equal opportunity in quality of education from the earliest age all the way through – this does not occur today. I am in engineering and have only had 1 black applicant come before me – and I hired him. Not because he was black but because he was the best candidate. The lack of candidates is an inequality of education – not in hiring. 2) Democrats just assume blacks will always vote for them and therefore take them for granted. That’s racist. BTW, isn’t it also racist to simply assume that blacks will vote for Obama because he’s black? This is exactly the same as assuming I would vote against him because I"m white.

CHIEFS DYNASTY – we’re kind of a big deal

by kabrink on Aug 17, 2011 12:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't believe political BS.

Here’s the best column I’ve read on the American state of affairs in a long time:
545 vs. 300,000,000 People
-By Charlie Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don’t propose a federal budget. The President does.

You and I don’t have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

You and I don’t write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don’t set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don’t control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 Congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme Court Justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a Senator, a Congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don’t care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator’s responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con, regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The President can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House now? He is the leader of the majority party. He and fellow House members, not the President, can approve any budget they want. If the President vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted — by present facts — of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can’t think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it’s because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it’s because they want it in the red.

If the Army and Marines are in Iraq and Afghanistan, it’s because they want them in Iraq and Afghanistan ..

If they do not receive Social Security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it’s because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems.

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like “the economy,” “inflation,” or “politics” that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.

They, and they alone, have the power.

They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses. Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees…

We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!

What you do with this article now that you have read it… is up to you.
This might be funny if it weren’t so true.
Be sure to read all the way to the end:

Tax his land,
Tax his bed,
Tax the table,
At which he’s fed.

Tax his tractor,
Tax his mule,
Teach him taxes
Are the rule.

Tax his work,
Tax his pay,
He works for
peanuts anyway!

Tax his cow,
Tax his goat,
Tax his pants,
Tax his coat.

Tax his ties,
Tax his shirt,
Tax his work,
Tax his dirt.

Tax his tobacco,
Tax his drink,
Tax him if he
Tries to think.

Tax his cigars,
Tax his beers,
If he cries
Tax his tears.

Tax his car,
Tax his gas,
Find other ways
To tax his ass.

Tax all he has
Then let him know
That you won’t be done
Till he has no dough.

When he screams and hollers;
Then tax him some more,
Tax him till
He’s good and sore.

Then tax his coffin,
Tax his grave,
Tax the sod in
Which he’s laid…

Put these words
Upon his tomb,
‘Taxes drove me
to my doom…’

When he’s gone,
Do not relax,
Its time to apply
The inheritance tax.

Accounts Receivable Tax
Building Permit Tax
CDL license Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Excise Taxes
Federal Income Tax
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel Permit Tax
Gasoline Tax (currently 44.75 cents per gallon)
Gross Receipts Tax
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Inventory Tax
IRS Interest Charges IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
Liquor Tax
Luxury Taxes
Marriage License Tax
Medicare Tax
Personal Property Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Service Charge Tax
Social Security Tax
Road Usage Tax
Recreational Vehicle Tax
Sales Tax
School T ax
State Income Tax
State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
Telephone Federal Excise Tax
Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes
Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
Telephone Recurring and Nonrecurring Charges Tax
Telephone State and Local Tax
Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Utility Taxes
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft Registration Tax
Well Permit Tax
Workers Compensation Tax

STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?
Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago and our nation was the most prosperous in the world.
We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom, if agreed, stayed home to raise the kids.

What in the heck happened? Can you spell ‘politicians?’

I hope this goes around THE USA at least 545 times!!! YOU can help it get there!!!

GO AHEAD. . . BE AN AMERICAN!!!

Ancora imparo.

by midcalchief on Aug 15, 2011 12:30 PM CDT reply actions   2 recs

ha! good stuff ...

then too, 100 yrs ago the world was a lot different than it is today … a totally different universe

I assure you one thing, though: 100 and more years ago there was corruption, crime, racism and more … rampant disease, child labor … it was by no means a perfect world

governments are made of men, men are human, humans have flaws … ergo, governments have flaws

so, what do you propose? and end to all taxes? awesome! good luck building a road or fixing a broken bridge … oh, sorry, you say that because that bridge is out you now have to drive 3 times as far to get to work? well, think of how much you saved on taxes by not having it repaired!

but wait, there’s more … taxes provide our country with a military, you DO like a strong country, don’t you? what’s that? you think it would have been better if we’d saved our tax money and instead we were all under the rule of Germany? well, that’s pretty much what would have happened 60 yrs ago if …

again, it’s just not always that simple

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

you think it would have been better if we’d saved our tax money and instead we were all under the rule of Germany? well, that’s pretty much what would have happened 60 yrs ago if …

again, it’s just not always that simple

I’ll take issue with that. Germany didn’t declare war on us until we declared war on Japan. Japan attacked us because we had an oil embargo on them. As Bastiat said, where goods cross borders, armies don’t.

As for roads, you might actually surprised how successful toll roads are (and common in areas such as Scandavia) at building roads free of taxpayer costs.

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -Gandhi.

by Sudden on Aug 15, 2011 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Germany was out for world domination ... that much really IS "just that simple"

… fortunately Hitler’s ego and appetite was bigger than his brain or his war machine … Hitler declared war on the world long before any “formal” decalrations of war with the USA

toll roads: yeah … one here, an outer loop highway that shaves a lot of commuting time off trips around Denver, except that it’s prohibitively expensive … not talking a few dollars, rather a few dollars every few miles … silly stuff

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Fair enough

Its still a moot point when discussing the federal budget. To be honest, the federal budget is three things DoD, SS, MC/MC. Everything else is pinner in comparison. Without significant reform of the growing entitlements, our currency will collapse, we will be facing civil unrest within a decade, and we will devolve into a third world banana republic.

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -Gandhi.

by Sudden on Aug 15, 2011 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

what, you got something against bananas? ;-)

very true … those are the Big Three … again, easy to pinpoint problem areas, not so easy to pinpoint workable solutions

/sigh

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not against taxes or government.

What I am against is the idea that the problems we face are insoluable because of political differences. Personally, I think the fact that lawyers and businessmen make up most of our government is a major flaw. One group is trained to argue endlessly about things they neither believe nor care about, and the other group is always looking for more ways to line their own pockets.
Hell, I’ve spent most of my life working for the government, as a soldier, teacher, trainer and social worker. Some of the things the government does well are just amazing and cannot be duplicated in the private sector. But we are no longer a government of the people, because it’s painfully obvious that the people are not well represented below the top ten income bracket.

Ancora imparo.

by midcalchief on Aug 15, 2011 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

with this I agree
What I am against is the idea that the problems we face are insoluable because of political differences

and honestly, this is far more entertaining than a discussion of which 7th string FB will or won’t make the roster :-)

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

People are very well represented below the top ten % income bracket

They are just not represented by their peers. The lower income brackets get a disproportional amount of the benefits.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

few below the top 10% can or will ever be elected to office ... it's too expensive

again, the best government money can BUY

does it not seem disproportionate that a rising % of wealth is concentrated in the hands of fewer and fewer individiuals, and that the gap between the top and the bottom is growing wider by the day?

welcome to America, the land of opportunity for a very small percentage of the overall population

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 3:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not entirely true

If it was we would have people like Perot and Trump as Presidents.

Yes the gap is widening, but shouldn’t that be expected?

Say a poor person invests $10 and a wealthy person invests $1M and they both get 10% on their investments. The gap just widened.

I think it is more appropriate to look at standard of living. My impression is the standard of living, even at the lowest levels has continually increased.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 3:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

you haven't been to many truly poor areas, have you?

unless by a higher standard of living you mean “oh goodie, a new cell phone” because aside from a few technological appeasements to the masses, the standard of living for the bottom dwellars is still atrocious, and both raw numbers of AND percentage of those below the poverty line are increasing day by day, year by year

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 3:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

want to know where standard of living HAS increased? even at the bottom ...

China

yup, they just happen to be doing Capitalism better than we’re doing it … tightly controlled, of course, and run by a “communist” government of course

but what they understand (and we don’t) is that runaway growth is not a good thing, not just runaway growth in terms of inflation, but runaway growth in the population … one side feeds the other side, you know, they go hand in hand

so by reducing popuplation growth and holding population relatively steady, while at the same time increasing monetary growth to a managable degree … prosperity is assured for everyone, not just for an elite few

oh, I’m under no illusions that the heads of government in China aren’t corrupt, or that they don’t live better than the rest of the country … they are and they do

but the main point is this: everyone in China has a higher standard of living … not just the bankers, not just some people … but ALL the people

that makes for a very happy populace, wouldn’t you say?

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Bad example........don't get me started on China

You know how they control population. They limit families to one child. The families value males more than females. So this wonderful communist society that you say is doing it right, is drowning infant girls so they can have another baby and hopefully be a boy. Don’t get me started.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 3:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

and I was just reading about how girls in China are actually doing BETTER now because of more opportunities ...

btw, a video for you here … Warren Buffet saying we SHOULD TAX THE WEALTHY EVEN MORE

and heere’s the link for the story about Chinese girls

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sure, more opportunities for the ones they allow to live.

How fucked up does a society have to be to kill baby girls, because they value a boy more.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

dunno, maybe as fucked up as a society that values white people more than people of color?

or one religion more than another …

I’m not sayin’ but I’m just sayin’

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Religion - This country was founded because of freedom of religion.

Can you think of an example of a country that has a more diverse religious population than the US living relatively peaceful.

As for color, laws to correct that stain on our country were enacted before I was born. I would say our culture regularly calls out people who demonstrate racial prejudice.

China on the other hand continues to practice gendercide.

There is a little-known battle for survival going in some parts of the world. Those at risk are baby girls, and the casualties are in the millions each year. The weapons being used against them are prenatal sex selection, abortion and female infanticide — the systematic killing of girls soon after they are born.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,281722,00.html#ixzz1V8UHhYNl

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 4:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

freedom of religion, yes

which of course explains why there was such an uproar in NYC for a proposed Mosque/Community Center/Basketball Court

religious tolerance indeed

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 4:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

No one said they couldn't practice their religion

and I don’t feel it was unreasonable for people to object to the location of the Mosque. Despite most people of the Muslim community being peace loving individuals, the fact is a radical sect was responsible for thousands of deaths just a few blocks away from the proposed site. The deaths were committed in the name of the Muslim faith.
If we didn’t have freedom of religion, there wouldn’t be a Mosque standing in the US.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 4:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

and how many deaths have been committed in the name of Christianity?

or in the name of Democracy …

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 4:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Too many for all of those reasons and more.

All I’m saying is there is freedom of religion in the US and no one is keeping the Muslims from practicing their religion. I merely said building the Mosque at the location they were planning was in poor taste and I understand why people would object to it.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 4:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

but it wasn't a Mosque

it was a community center – I guess the boarded up and abandoned shops, liquor stores and strip joints that are already in the neighborhood are in better taste, eh?

no, certainly it’s “understandable” … freedom of religion is freedom when it doesn’t offend someone else

when it’s convenient, of course … I understand that

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 5:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

They were even considering calling it "Ground Zero Mosque"
While we’re considering the term "Ground Zero Mosque," we also wondered whether it was proper to call the project a mosque. A mosque is, in fact, planned there, but it’s part of a plan for a much larger, $100 million cultural center that includes a swimming pool, gym and basketball court, a 500-seat auditorium, a restaurant and culinary school, a library and art studios.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 5:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

yeah, sounds like a DANGEROUS place to me!
$100 million cultural center that includes a swimming pool, gym and basketball court, a 500-seat auditorium, a restaurant and culinary school, a library and art studios

truly could be a hotbed of terrorism … I mean, think about it … ART STUDIOS!

/runs in fear

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 16, 2011 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sounds like a wonderful place

And good intentions in building it. It is also inconsiderate of the feelings others, who do not share their religious beliefs.

And those who speak out against it have every right to do so as guaranteed by our constitution.

by grid_iron on Aug 16, 2011 11:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

we agree on those factual statements about "rights"

then too, nobody is considerate of my feelings and religious beliefs when they go to put up a church or a statue of Jesus or a Nativity scene

on Christians have feelings that should be accounted for?

of course not … and the “issue” here isn’t even one of “taste” much less “right to protest” or “right to build” … the real issue, the DEEPER issue (in my mind) is this: where do you “draw the line” … at what point is a “protest” no longer a protest but rather discrimination?

there were even a good number of 911 families and survivors of those who were killed who said flat out that even THEY had no problem with the proposal … do THEIR feelings not count? is THEIR VIEW not worthy?

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 16, 2011 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Everyones view counts

But we do live in a democracy and no single view is weighted more than another.
If the majority believed as you do, then the world would be a much different place.
You are in the minority on your thinking.

by grid_iron on Aug 16, 2011 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

We actually live in a Republic

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United states of America, and to the Republic for which it stands….

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm surprised you even know the pledge
Representative democracy involves the selection of government officials by the people being represented. If the head of state is also democratically elected then it is called a democratic republic.47 The most common mechanisms involve election of the candidate with a majority or a plurality of the votes.

by grid_iron on Aug 16, 2011 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

cool I guess

We’re still a republic either way you cut

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

you even have the freedom to practice your weird ass religion

and build a totem in your back yard. I on the other hand have the freedom to call it a weird ass religion and object to the construction of your totem.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

likewise.............

If a group of Christians killed 3000 people in a given location in the name of Catholicism. I would understand if people objected to a Cathedral being built near the location.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 5:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sadly not true

when you look at Cambodia under Pol Pot, the Sudan, The Balkans in the 90’s

by Steve_Chiefs on Aug 15, 2011 8:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

I said most......Not all

There will always be barbarians……….

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 8:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Tamba Hali in 2010 ...

… the blood dripping from his mouth

ah, the evils of modern man

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 16, 2011 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

We free a nation that doesn't

let women go to school or function in society other than to reproduce and we are the ones not civilized.
We free a nation from a tyrant that killed thousands with gas, who’s son fed people to lions, and we’re the the ones not civilized.
Warped thinking……………….

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 8:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

We do when it suits us

that is part of the problem our meddling seems to be very selective. The Middle East

by Steve_Chiefs on Aug 15, 2011 8:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh yeah

Mubarak’s our boy

Gaddafi? get that mofo

Ahmanadinejad? meh whatever

Saddam? He doesn’t deserve to live

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 15, 2011 8:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

We went into Kuwait when begged by the Kuwait's

The people of Iraq were pissed we didn’t finish the job with Saddam at that time. The only reason they were hesitant to welcome our action with Bush 2 is because they were afraid we wouldn’t finish the job again.

Going into Afghanistan? Yes that was just on a whim. The world trade center had nothing to do with it.

How about Kosovo? Seems we were begged to go there.

Just where the hell did we go on a whim?

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 8:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Libya

Somalia, Yemen, Pakistan…

And well whoever else we deemed a threat over the last 80 years.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

as opposed to our own who are poverty stricken and dying slowly ...

yes, a slow death from an atrocious life is far preferable to a fast, painless death

sorry dude, we do NOT have our own house completely in order just yet

I have ZERO issues with anyone making 50 bazillion a DAY and doing whatever the hell he wants with it, but NOT when we have children w/o food, medicine, clothing, proper educational opportunities, housing, etc

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 16, 2011 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

did that guy that made the money

CAUSE those problems?

CHIEFS DYNASTY – we’re kind of a big deal

by kabrink on Aug 17, 2011 12:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

Of course

He caused all the evil and hopelessness in the world the greedy bastardo

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 17, 2011 12:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Its not at all Steve

And its one of the reasons why the world hates us.

We drop Humanitarian Bombs on populations, and the American People think we’re just so civilized

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 15, 2011 8:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

We blow em up

and then rebuild em with the treasuries (our) money

by Steve_Chiefs on Aug 15, 2011 8:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well we wouldn't know

Because we use our own troops to rebuild what we blew up.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

go take a look at the Aborigines

doing just fine without our technology, tyvm

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 16, 2011 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Don't think so
The infant mortality rate among indigenous people is three times higher than the national average, or 15.2 deaths per 1,000 births compared to five per 1,000.

by grid_iron on Aug 16, 2011 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Steve, there's the deal ...

we rebuild BUT we then “own” it all … the factories, power plants, oil and whatever govt is set up

“Yessir Massah Americah”

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 16, 2011 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

This is either sarcasm or wrong

If this were true we wouldn’t have a National debt and would have a hell of a revenue stream coming in from around the world.

by grid_iron on Aug 16, 2011 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

Corporations profit

While we use our money to clear the way

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Corps profiting from reconstruction

is far different than ongoing “ownership”

by grid_iron on Aug 16, 2011 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Its an informal Empire

The Corporations just have a USDA stamp on them.

But who says keeping a global empire for extended periods of time is a money maker? Romans, Mongolians, English, Portugese, Spanish all say otherwise

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

yeah if we are paying for reconstruction

I would rather see our tax dollars spent on an American company than a Iraq company.

by grid_iron on Aug 16, 2011 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Exactly

instead of bringing a battered country, that was battered with our own bombs and troops, back up by paying their companies, we just pay our own.

The rich get richer, and the poor stay poor.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Its not enough we rid them of a tyrant

and rebuild their infrastructure, and buy billions of their products. Now we need to employ them too.
Is there anything else you think we should do for these poor bastards.

by grid_iron on Aug 16, 2011 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lolz we've killed and maimed more people then Afghanistan and Iraqi governments combined ever did

I’m sure they’re saying Thank you for that Warped thinking though…………..

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 15, 2011 8:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not civilians

not saying there aren’t civilian causalities, there are, but no where near the number Sadam killed.

Yes most civilians are glad we have been there.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 8:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

We've killed so many civilians dude

Clinton in the 90s killed more children then Saddam ever did, and that is a fact. You really think we haven’t killed more civilians since then?

I’m not just talking about Iraq either, I’m talking Afghanistan, Libya, Pakistan, Somalia and everywhere else we’re bombing.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 15, 2011 8:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dude - Just how many children do you think Clinton killed?
The attack killed between 3,200 and 5,000 people, and injured around 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians;12 thousands more died of complications, diseases, and birth defects in the years after the attack.3 The incident, which has been officially defined as an act of genocide against the Kurdish people in Iraq,4 was and still remains the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history.5

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 8:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

WARPED THINKING

Blame children’s death’s on economic sanctions instead of their leaders actions that caused the sanctions.

Even the UNICEF survey conceded that the sanctions were only one factor among many contributing to child malnutrition, and one must include the economic costs of the failed invasion of Kuwait, the devastation of the 8-year Iran-Iraq war, the brutal oppression of the Shi’a in the 1990s, the inherent economic inequalities of the Ba’ath tyranny, and the earlier brutalization of the Kurds.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 9:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

This doesn't even matter

In all the middle east we’ve killed more people, that’s right civilians, then Saddam ever has.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 12:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

Then why are you forgetting facts?

It is a fact that we’ve killed more people in the middle east then Saddam ever has, we’ve killed more innocent people with bomb strikes over the last 60 years then Saddam ever killed in his own country with Chemical weapons we gave him to begin with.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Link please?

Please show me any link that states we have killed more civilians than the thousands Sadam killed in one gassing attack.

by grid_iron on Aug 16, 2011 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

With weapons we gave him!!!!!

Jeebus its like talking to a wall.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Warped thinking

Blame the US for Saddam killing his own people.

Like we gave him the gas and said hey asshole go kill your own citizens.

You probably blame all the gun manufactures for producing guns that kill people.

Warped Thinking

by grid_iron on Aug 16, 2011 1:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

We gave a mad man the capability of killing his own people

With chemical weapons.

True guns don’t kill people, people kill people. and because of people in our own government thousands of Iraqis died because of Chemical attacks.

Our meddling, our policing of the world directly led to the deaths of innocent civilians. To think otherwise is Warped Thinking.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

How about some numbers?

I gave you numbers on the ones (they know about) Saddam killing.
Surely you can back up your claims with more than just talk.

by grid_iron on Aug 16, 2011 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Given up huh? Saddam's chemical attacks with weapons we gave him should suffice

But if you want:
http://cursor.org/stories/civilian_deaths.htm

“What causes the documented high level of civilian casualties — 3,000 – 3,400 [October 7, 2001 thru March 2002] civilian deaths — in the U.S. air war upon Afghanistan? The explanation is the apparent willingness of U.S. military strategists to fire missiles into and drop bombs upon, heavily populated areas of Afghanistan.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War

^According to Wiki the average seems to be about 100,000 civilians

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Read all of your Wiki link
For the major combat phase of the war from March to April 2003, Abu Dhabi TV reported on April 8, 2003, that Iraqi sources had claimed that 1,252 civilians had been killed and 5,103 had been wounded. The Iraq Body Count project (IBC project), incorporating subsequent reports, has reported that by the end of the major combat phase up to April 30, 2003, 7,299 civilians had been killed, primarily by U.S. air-and-ground forces.72

by grid_iron on Aug 16, 2011 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lol there's your proof right there
7,299 civilians had been killed, primarily by U.S. air-and-ground forces.

And that was back in 2003, you think civilians have stopped dying by US hands since then?

Regardless the death toll is up to about 100,000 civilians now. 100,000 that died because we decided to go to war with Iraq because of lies and false reasoning.

Now that sir is Warped Thinking.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Defies logic

Only 7000 killed in the MAJOR BOMBING STIKES.

And we Gunned down 93,000 civilians with our ground troops. Bullshit.

by grid_iron on Aug 16, 2011 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

You don't get it

Because we went to war, those civilians were murdered. A war of our own making, killed 100,000 civilians.

All those deaths, whether indirectly or directly are our fault.

Still I’ve proven my point, in the Middle East we’ve directly killed far more civilians then Saddam ever did, and the death toll continues to rise every single day.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's cool

Still doesn’t help the civilians we’ve killed or their families. Or their people in countries we’ve ruined even more then we did before.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Freedom does come with a price

The Brits and the US paid a heavy price when we won our freedom.

It would be great if it could be done with no civilian casualties, but that’s just not reality.

by grid_iron on Aug 16, 2011 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Freedom? What freedom?

There’s no freedom there, just death.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why is this even our problem?

With us there its still happening, hatred and sexist violence doesn’t stop because of more violence.

Now it just has the added benefit of US Intrusion into their daily lives, politics, and well everything they do.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

If you think the quality of life has not

been raised for women in Afghanistan, you are delusional.

by grid_iron on Aug 16, 2011 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Quality of life?

A life living in fear of an American bomb landing on you head. Doesn’t sound like a high quality lifestyle.

But hey they can at least vote in rigged elections right?

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

And what about MINOR bombing strikes?

Do they not count anymore?

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Civilians is a loose term in the Mid East

We’ve been over there for 10 years. If they haven’t figured out to get the hell out of the way of what we are targeting, I don’t have a lot of sympathy.

by grid_iron on Aug 16, 2011 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh so now its their fault

Even though we brought the war to them. Even though there’s no way to prepare for a bomb being dropped on top of your head. Even though we’re bombing several different countries in the Middle East so they’re running out of options to hide.

Ridiculous.

I’m sure if China was dropping bombs on America, it would be our fault for staying too right? You’re despicable man.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

If China was bombing us

and you’re stupid enough to hang out with the military, yes it’s your fault.

by grid_iron on Aug 16, 2011 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm sorry am I in Bizarro world?

I guess its the victim’s fault because the killer killed them. Lolz.

With statements like that no wonder the world hates Americans.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

If you're hanging out with the military

you are only a victim of your own making.

If you jumped into a bonfire, you would blame the guy who built the fire. It surely wouldn’t be your fault for being stupid and jumping in it.

by grid_iron on Aug 16, 2011 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

And you call me a Warped Thinker?

Whatever helps you sleep at night man.

Doesn’t really matter what kind of analogies or Metaphors you make, when a person kills someone, unless its in defense of his own life, its there fault that they killed them. Human Beings are not bonfires.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Besides the point

hanging out with military? What if China decided a University where kids go to school is a military establishment? What if a residential neighborhood is designated a military base?

Nah its still the victims faults, they should’ve moved to Canada.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 3:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Seems simple to me

Soldiers show up in front of my house with guns. I’m not stickin around for the shootin to begin.

by grid_iron on Aug 16, 2011 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Except

They’re not showing up in front of your house, they’re dropping bombs and bullets from high altitudes.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 17, 2011 12:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

You're wrong about opportunity

A person does not have to have money to have opportunity, although it never hurts.
Millionaires are made every day. Anyone can come up with the next million dollar idea.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 3:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Add it up.

The amount of “wealth welfare” in the form of tax breaks, business incentives and other corporate welfare far exceed the paltry benefits doled out to those of the bottom. This notion that the poor are overindulged is another “big lie” of right wing propagandists.

Ancora imparo.

by midcalchief on Aug 15, 2011 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Individuals not Corp

But either way, you can’t get a tax break if you don’t pay taxes and its a known fact the upper 10% pay the lions share of taxes. They aren’t drawing unemployment, food stamps, medicaid, etc. The lions share of the benefits are not going to those who are paying the lions share of the taxes.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

and the lions share of the money isn;'t going to those who do the lions share of the work and labor to begin with

some CEO in a plush office does less “work” in my book than any poor schmuck flipping burgers at McDonald’s

you want to talk trash about income? prattle on about “benefits” but when those benefits are more valuable to some young mom who wants to WORK but has to watch her kid, and then pay for childcare, and then drive to work and get paid minimum wages and end up with a LOWER net income than if she’d stayed home … oh yeah, there’s a problem

you want to talk about benefits? how about talk about WAGES instead … low wages, poverty wages that ENSURE those below the line will stay there forever because that’s how it is and has always been … opportunity? that’s for the RICH, my friend … oh sure, anyone can get an education and blah blah … do you know how much it costs to go to college? and only the grads from the BEST colleges get the BEST jobs … and who can afford the BEST colleges? why, the wealthy, of course!

some lazyass corporate exec rakes in millions, steals from the masses then is rewarded with a golden parachute that pays him millions more … the costs of which are, of course, passed on as always to the consumer … and you DARE call that WORK?!?

GE pays ZERO in taxes on over $5 Billion in PROFITS and, to top it off, is allowed by your Right Wing Supreme Court to BUY ELECTIONS as a “person” and yet you talk about the rich paying taxes?!?

bull + shit, sir

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

The lions share of the "tax revenue" IS re-distributed those making less.

Enron is one example of a Greedy individual, that should have been thrown in jail. Get over it.
As for GE, that is Obama’s Haliburton. Don’t blame GE on the right wing.

by grid_iron on Aug 15, 2011 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

wow

You obviously have no economic understanding. CEO “lazy and doing less work”? They don’t do physical work, so I guess you’re right. However, most CEOs are always on the clock and they are all responsible to millions of shareholders, institutions, and employees. Do you think you want that job? Do you think you can do that job? I don’t think you can.

Jobs are paid by the ability to fill them. If a job can be done by anyone then it is easy to fill and has a lot of competition which drives the wage down. Jobs that are difficult to fill garner higher wages. Supply and demand is a very simple concept if you care to learn about it and understand it.

CHIEFS DYNASTY – we’re kind of a big deal

by kabrink on Aug 17, 2011 12:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

when even the wealthy themselves like Warren Buffet are sayingg they should pay more taxes ...

well, someone is full of it … and yanno, I kind of respect Warren Buffet

http://www.yahoo.com/ylt=Al1M7UPOLPF8SeSDocXkvFibvZx4;ylc=X3oDMTh1cjF0Ym0xBF9TAzIwMjM1MzgwNzUEYQMxMTA4MTUgZmluYW5jZSBidWZmZXR0IHJhaXNlIHRheGVzIHYEY3BvcwM0BGcDaWQtNDM0NTYxBGludGwDdXMEaXRjAzAEbHR4dANCdWZmZXR0OlN0b3Bjb2RkbGluZ3RoZXJpY2gEcGtndgM1BHBvcwMwBHNlYwN0ZC1mZWF0BHNsawN0aHVtYmxpbmsEdGFyA2h0dHA6Ly9maW5hbmNlLnlhaG9vLmNvbS9ibG9ncy9kYWlseS10aWNrZXIvYnVmZmV0dC1ibGFzdHMtbG93LXRheGVzLWJpbGxpb25haXJlcy1zYXlzLWNvbmdyZXNzLW11c3QtMTQyMjM5MzY2Lmh0bWwEdGVzdAM3MDE-/SIG=147meqr7s/EXP=1313528452/**http%3A//finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/buffett-blasts-low-taxes-billionaires-says-congress-must-142239366.html

so, the poor get a few thousand in “welfare” and the rich get a few million in what amounts to welfare … hmmm

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 15, 2011 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ron Paul wants

to completely abolish the IRS. YAY.

by ichirix on Aug 15, 2011 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Which is great

His gutting of Defense, is really stripping away the Offense part of it.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 15, 2011 7:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

If I were elected president

I would nominate Romeo Crennel as my Secretary of Defense

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -Gandhi.

by Sudden on Aug 15, 2011 10:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'd hire Belicheck and Pioli

Don’t know for what positions but I’d find something

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 12:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ron Paul is

THE MAN! We need a strong leader in economics and a man that always sends back a majority of his annual budget sounds great to me.

by JimDog on Aug 15, 2011 5:50 PM CDT reply actions  

I wonder why Iran would want a Nuke?


US Military Bases in the Middle East

But the TV Box told me they’re crazy and want to blow up Israel!!! Yeah that’s gotta be it.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMStCHtUNeY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqDy6H1bEQs

^Nobody else seeing a pattern at all?

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 12:50 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

it certainly isn't to drop on US

of course, ours are so old many of then likely don’t work anyway …

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 16, 2011 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Its just sad to see so many Americans

Falling for the same BS again and again and again.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jon Stewart: Why is the media ignoring Ron Paul??

http://gawker.com/5831167/

^One of the more enjoyable Daily Show segments

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Aug 16, 2011 1:09 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog! Follow us on Facebook and on Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Chiefs OTA's: Some Real Football News
Dscn3246_3_small
Worst Case Scenario
Lips-rhps_small
Translating Coachspeak (Humor & Satire)

Recent FanPosts

Supernova1007_small
What Does it Take?
Ford-mustang-gt-2011-wallpaper-02_small
Hope
New_kc_helm_small
Scott Pioli: Genuine Mastermind Part 1 - Quarterbacks
Dirtyhippy_small
The Epic Battle of Pittsburgh(Game 9 preview)
Spit_small
A Unique Look At Elite QB's and Ricky Stanzi
309look_small
Cassel, can the chiefs get a ring on his back?
Small
Trade McCluster...
Supernova1007_small
A New 3-4 team in the NFL
Supernova1007_small
Fashionistas

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Ct_fb_small Chris Thorman

Headshot_small Joel Thorman

Editors

288-chiefstexans0944_sp_8-15-09_jfs woodman212

Matt_ssv_pic_small_small Matt Conner

Stag_20silhouette_small stagdsp

Lips-rhps_small upamtn

Contributors

Kc_ny_small NJ Chiefs Fan

Phoenix_by_melen_small KaloPhoenix

N1358340181_30185582_5800_small Flowers24

Small Jon Yoon

Dirkness_small HisDirkness

Dscn3246_3_small MNchiefsfan

Cassel_small Steve_in_RI