Chiefs are largely set at all positions but OT, RB, and LB

I figure the Chiefs are 3 players from their top 53. A runningback group of Charles, Jones, and McCluster could use a young veteran; maybe Battle re-ups? The Chiefs have no established depth at OT; it's unlikely the team can rely on one of their UDFAs to provide the depth they need. A veteran should at least be brought in to compete. And then, depending upon the health of Sheffield the Chiefs might want a 10th body at LB. Maybe they go with 7 D-linemen, but they've not done so since switching to a 3-4.

10 months ago Dagda 10 comments 0 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

I'd say that were set at RB and LB

Of course any position can be upgraded but we def don’t have needs at RB and LB

by RamX21 on Jul 28, 2011 9:17 AM CDT via mobile reply actions

they are getting close...

Most of the guys yet to be signed will be short-lived, camp fodder.

here’s my latest guess on the 53, with up-for-grabs spots in italics… not many left!

Offense (25)
(2) QB: Cassel, Stanzi
(4) RB: Charles, Jones, McCluster, Battle
(2) FB: Cox, Bannon
(5) WR: Bowe, Baldwin, Breaston, Tucker, Copper
(4) TE: Moeaki, Pope, O’Connell, Cottam (or Slate)
(3) OT: Albert, Richardson, O’Callaghan (or FA)
(3) OG: Waters, Lilja, Asamoah
(2) C: Weigmann, Hudson

Defense (25)
(2) NT: Powe, (FA)
(5) DE: Dorsey, Jackson, Gillberry, Bailey, Smith
(5) OLB: Hali, Studebaker, Sheffield, Houston, Miller
(4) ILB: DJ, Belcher, Cory Greenwood, Micah Johnson
(4) S: Berry, Lewis, Washington, McGraw
(5) CB: Flowers, Carr, Arenas, Daniels, Brown

Specialists (3): Succop, Colquitt, Gafford

by stagdsp on Jul 28, 2011 9:18 AM CDT reply actions