Kalo's Knockdown: Glenn Dorsey
Hey there, APers! I'm back for the offseason to run through a little segment I've been tossing around for awhile. After spending too much time staring at the defensive front seven, I've come up with my opinions about the strengths and weaknesses of various players on the team. When discussing these with others, I reference these abilities with little to back my opinions up. Therefore, I've decided to run through each player, look at my perceived strengths/weaknesses of the player, and find examples of these perceived weaknesses (and convert them into .GIF format). Up first: Glenn Dorsey.
WARNING: These GIFs are large. To anyone that struggles with bandwidth, this may not be the series for you. For your convenience, the GIFs are clickable links, so they will not auto-play.
Perceived Strength: Penetration/Pass Rush
Glenn (as we all know) was a highly touted penetrating defensive lineman coming out of college. After a season or two of some struggles, along with a switch to a 3-4 defensive end, Glenn really stepped up this season. One of his best attributes as a defensive lineman is his ability to collapse the pocket and beat a single blocker. Below comes from the Week 17 game against the Raiders.
As you can see, from the yellow arrow, Glenn is playing the RDE in a nickel formation. As the ball is snapped, Studebaker and Hali take the outside speed routes, and Gilberry fills Studebaker's inside lane. This leaves Dorsey with a single blocker, whom he walks back into the pocket. As Studebaker and Hali force the quarterback forward into the pocket, Glenn throws his blocker to the side and covers the space quickly, resulting in a strong sack.
This is an example of something Glenn did well all year long, both in the pass rush and against the rush. He seems to deal a lot of damage with a sharp side step and some hand-fighting, resulting in a very hard to block lineman with good up-the-field speed.
Perceived Weakness: Anchoring/Power Against the Double Team
One of the common aspects some may see in the 4-3 DT to 3-4 DE conversion is a lack of strong anchor against a double team. Glenn can sometimes exhibit this weakness. As stated above, Dorsey is best when the Chiefs can put him in a 1-v-1 situation with a little space around him. While this is ideal, he also has to deal with a weakside double team when the blocking scheme calls for it. One of the things that I've picked up is that he doesn't deal well with the double, especially when one of the offensive lineman is considerably bigger than he is. Below is an example of this, from the Week 9 Raiders game.
Again, Dorsey is shown in yellow. After the snap, the defensive line moves towards the strong side (Side Note: this is quite rare in this defense, and the fact that Tamba and Vrabel are BOTH lined up on that side shows how much the Chiefs were selling out the strongside run). Dorsey starts in, then recognizes the pull blocker and tries to cut back to the outside. When this happens, the GIF shows him try to anchor, then get pancaked by the second blocker, who moves into the second level on his feet. This created a MASSIVE hole on that side of the field. Neither DJ nor Belcher did a very good job at attacking the hole, but there was ample room for the running back to squeeze through without a defensive front near the gap.
Glenn does catch plenty of double teams, but rarely is he able to hold them at the line of scrimmage. Again, the Chiefs don't ask him to do so very often, but when the blocking scheme goes at that side of the line with a double team, it can create a problem in the front seven due to his occasional ineffectiveness against a bigger double.
*******************
Glenn is a solid defensive penetrator, and is strong against both the run and the pass. While he does lack the ability to hold his ground against the double team consistently, the team has recognized this and tries to keep him as a singled blocker, with pretty good success.
Thanks for reading, everyone!
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.
153 comments
|
33 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great post Kalo
Uggg, that McFadden run was ugly. It wasn’t just Dorsey, but the whole Defense was manhandled on that play. It seems like the cutback run always gave us the fits, especially during the 2nd half of the year.
I'm tired of pretending like I'm not bitching, a total fricking rock star from Mars, and people can't figure me out; they can't process me. I don't expect them to. You can't process me with a normal brain.
by craig in calgary on Mar 21, 2011 7:16 PM CDT reply actions
Agreed.
Belcher and DJ really didn’t do anything to fill that gap, but it’s hard to get after them when it’s that wide. And on top of it, the second blocker for Dorsey really didn’t need to do much…he just put the kibosh on the pancake.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
I believe there is a direct link to our second half struggles against the run
And Big Ron fading down the stretch.
Of course, I could be wrong… looks like Kalo will let me know soon enough.
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.
One of the founding members of The Super Duper Matt Cassel Fanclub.
We all have the right to our own opinions, its just that mine are right.
My quest for soberiety is an ongoing struggle.
by nateforchiefs on Mar 22, 2011 9:27 PM CDT up reply actions
Great stuff Kalo
Good idea with the series….keep ’em coming.
After a lot of youtube scouting...I think Kerrigan could play OLB.
nothing i like more than a KP post
Nice work.
Dorsey was disruptive this year, and played at a high level. Hopefully, the Chiefs find ways to let him get after the QB more this year… I want to see more of that dance he did in college!
Prediction: KC will not draft a LB before the 3rd round
by stagdsp on Mar 21, 2011 7:22 PM CDT via mobile reply actions 1 recs
Nice post
Dorsey is very talented. Love the guy as a player, always max effort
We're the same team as last year, except incredibly better, and with new players.
Nothing much a DE can do against a Double TE set
I think it was all on the ILB’s on that one.
Now does this mean Dorsey is not an effective 3-4 DE?
to my mind 5+1 O against 3+2 D equals not every DLineman is going to get a Double team, only one in fact. So Dorsey getting doubled mean he is our most effective Run-Stuffer :)
I love math
"We feel very strongly that our best policy is to draft the best player. This isn't fantasy football." - Ted Thompson
I was merely pointing out how easily he was manhandled on that play.
The second blocker in the double team didn’t really need to give him the shove, as he was already bulldozed out of the play. Most of the examples I have of his failure to anchor are on the backside of a camera angle and don’t give a clear view. This one did, so I used it.
As far as that goes, just being doubled doesn’t necessarily mean you’ve done your job. Usually, a DE or NT will anchor and won’t get shoved out of the way, creating a giant gap, like this example showed. Again, the team tries very hard to make sure Dorsey doesn’t have to deal with a consistent double team, and his ability to get into the backfield and/or handle a single team is what makes him our most effective run stuffer.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
I was not attacker the poster :) or the player :)
If we need a better DE, we need a better DE. That will not fly very well on AP cause we have our set needs already clarified with Butter IMO.
Do you see that Phil Taylor (as more a penetrator, less a two gap NT) is the real answer?
Would he help Dorsey and Jackson get singled up more often? hence both OLB’s get one-on-one situations more often?
Too my mind if the DT is slanting Strong side the ILB’s should be covering the backside gaps. Which in the vid they did not do.
I ask to find out Kalo!
"We feel very strongly that our best policy is to draft the best player. This isn't fantasy football." - Ted Thompson
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 21, 2011 8:31 PM CDT up reply actions
Not intending to jump on you Steve. =)
I wouldn’t necessarily say we need a better DE there. I think he’s perfect for our system, he’s just not necessarily an “anchor and hold” type DE. T-Jax is more of that type of player, and if we had a NT that was excellent at doing this consistently as well, Dorsey would find himself singled up more often than not, which would play to his strengths as a penetrator.
As far as the slant goes, we do that quite a bit, and Smith/T-Jax (after diagnosis) are good at planting and holding their ground. Now, they’re nowhere near the playmaker/penetrator that Dorsey is, but I’ll get to that when I get to them. =)
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
by KaloPhoenix on Mar 21, 2011 8:39 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Thanks Kalo
already rec’d on the read
"We feel very strongly that our best policy is to draft the best player. This isn't fantasy football." - Ted Thompson
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 21, 2011 8:58 PM CDT up reply actions
Thanks for the discussion points, Steve.
I appreciate it.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
Great work, the more I study, the more I believe that Paea is the nose tacke we need.
The strongest man in the draft, 44 reps at 225, squats at 600+, anchors low .
Great run stuffer. Although he will not per say collapse the pocket has been know to knock offensive linemen back into the QB thus disrupting and driving them into the waiting arms of a teammate. High motor guy.
Interested in your thoughts on him Kalo???
Additionally we can probably get Paea in the 3rd or 4th round.
I would like to see us double up on NT’s , in the draft. I think it would be a wise strategy, much like Baltimore did last year I believe.
no way he makes it to the 3rd or 4th!
and, I’m not sure he’s a NT
Prediction: KC will not draft a LB before the 3rd round
He is a nose tackle and actually he is slated for 5th or maybe 6th round.
The reason is he is not a pocket collapser which most teams want, but in out scheme it is not neccessary.
The other thing that hurts him is speed, he has a great burst of the line and is quick, but he will never chase a QB down in pursuit, no top end. But that is not his job in our scheme. Our nose tackle needs to secure the front of the pocket and not allow the QB to step up or worse scamble straight up the middle for a first down. This he can do. He will hold his area of responsibility. <aimntain his disci[line. Also was a Captain or captain for a couple of games I believe
are you thinking of Fua?
Paea is a 1st or 2nd rond prospect, period.
Prediction: KC will not draft a LB before the 3rd round
by stagdsp on Mar 23, 2011 10:30 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
The one projected draft I looked at showed him much later, then after I posted I looked at draftek, and he wasrated much higherSo by that I am incorrect
still this is a player that is worth looking at.
Also I still believe we should double up on a NT, one early and one in the later rounds.
Your thoughts
I think he's a really good player
I worry that he’s a Tank Tyler/Glenn Dorsey body type, though… so I don’t really see a NT in Paea.
I would be fine doubling up on NT… but, I don’t see the Chiefs actually doing it.
My guess is that the fans think NT is a bigger problem than the Chiefs do… I think KC brings Edwards and Smith back, but add a rookie to rotate and develop.
I hope that rookie is Taylor or Powe.
IF they “doubled down” … I’d go Taylor and either Williams or Gray. Taylor should be ready to play sooner, the other guys have good long term potential.
Prediction: KC will not draft a LB before the 3rd round
I've been tossing an idea around in my head
what do you think it would take for the Chiefs to trade Glenn Dorsey for Ahtyba Rubin? With the Browns switching to the 3-4 and needed a pass rush. The Browns could maximize Dorsey while the Chiefs could maximize Rubin
Back on the Sione Fua bandwagon.
B(lind)old supporter of Polynesian players in the NFL
Dorsey can be an elite player with consistent play at the NT position.
I wouldn’t trade Dorsey for a guy like Rubin at this point.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
Hm.
Makes enough sense
Back on the Sione Fua bandwagon.
B(lind)old supporter of Polynesian players in the NFL
I said this in one post asking
What positions we need to draft and why. I think with a solid NT that always demands a double team that leaves Dorsey singled like you said. Then that leaves a TE or a back alone on Hali, a matchup i’ll take 8 days a week
I'd trade Dorsey for a 1st rounder this year and a 1st next year.
Lots of good defensive line guys in this years draft.
Warning: If you're reading this it has been censored.
Disclaimer: Comments above are not meant to be taken with a grain of salt.
Great then we can wait 3 years for them to develop
by groundedchevy on Mar 22, 2011 9:19 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Suh didnt need anytime to develop..
I cant remember but did Dorsey’s battery pack or shipping label say 3 years to cure or develop?
Suh is a freak
name another one…
Prediction: KC will not draft a LB before the 3rd round
by stagdsp on Mar 22, 2011 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
ngata wasn't nearly as good his rookie year
The only players I hurt with my words are the ones who have an inflated opinion of their ability. I can't worry about that.
Bill Parcells
Knowledge is confidence. And confidence lets you play fast.
Bill Parcells
Okay...If you say so
But still, the “3 yr development” rule is crap. We are still hoping that rule applies to Jackson. I believe its a some players “want it” rule and some dont.
What about players
That have steadily improved and are 5x better than their rookie year? Because that applies to both Dorsey and Jackson.
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
Improved at what level? (T. Jackson)
So he disappointed early expectations, but he made 20 more tackles…well, lets stake our claim in that. I hate to be the one to break this to you son, but sometimes they make the wrong pick…it happens to the best of them, just ask the old school Jet fans, but since you know it all…iam sure you have some more gargabe truck bu11shit to say back.
I think it largely depends on your expectations.
T-Jax wasn’t a pass rusher at the collegiate level, he was a strong end who held his ground well. I never held the allusion that he was going to be Richard Seymour, instead expecting a strongside DE that doesn’t let plays get through him.
Teams ran unsuccessfully at that side of the line when he was on the field (and yes, part of that has to do with Vrabel’s success against the run). He’s a stout 3-4 DE that can lock down the strong side, and that’s what he was drafted to be. He won’t put up giant sack numbers, and he may not land a bunch of TFL’s ever in his career, but he has the serious potential to make those around him MUCH better. In my opinion, we saw serious strides in that department this year.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
by KaloPhoenix on Mar 23, 2011 7:36 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
There was something said
about shutting down half the field to the running game.
with a little help on either side I can see that happening for Tyson Jackson
"We feel very strongly that our best policy is to draft the best player. This isn't fantasy football." - Ted Thompson
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 23, 2011 7:39 PM CDT up reply actions
I agree
If you look at how much Dorsey and Jackson have improved over the last couple of years, and what type of players they are now, THEN consider that they haven’t had a consistently solid NT at their side….
I get excited just thinking about the possibilities. Remember early in the season before Big Ron wore down? We pretty much shut down MJD, Foster, and Gore and were a top running defense.
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I think part of that was teams figuring out our run defense.
We did a pretty good job at shifting and disguising early in the year, but the Raiders really exposed us with quicker linemen and pull-blocking schemes…something that exploited our interior and weakside run defense.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
ohoh
weakside run defense
does not sound good for Hali/Dorsey
"We feel very strongly that our best policy is to draft the best player. This isn't fantasy football." - Ted Thompson
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 23, 2011 8:22 PM CDT up reply actions
Tamba is not a good run defender, typically.
And as shown above, Glenn can be doubled out of the play.
Tamba tends to get way too far upfield in the run game, leaving Dorsey to fill the gap. When he’s doubled out of it, the gap can be cavernous. Tamba does it often, so I’d assume he’s likely being taught to do it, though.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
scheme
What can you do if you want pressure?
Again the WILB should fill that hole in the Scheme. Or Romeo needs to figure out a different way. There is no way that the Chiefs could do it differently unless you move the issue to the strong side with Hali attacking the RT.
"We feel very strongly that our best policy is to draft the best player. This isn't fantasy football." - Ted Thompson
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 23, 2011 8:45 PM CDT up reply actions
Normally we shift the line a bit to solve that.
When Dorsey’s just off the inside shoulder of the tackle, and our NT is shading to the center’s weakside, it does work for us. Part of the problem with having the WILB cover that is that it’s just such a large gap to cover. He may stuff the FB in the gap, but if there’s too much space, the RB will just dart around it. When we shift, the gap gets smaller, and the FB stuffed in the hole prevents a running lane.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
And I like Tamba taking that outside line.
It’s part of the reason he gets sacks from that spot. It just also can hurt us against the run, although he’s not great at holding the edge against bigger LT’s close to the line of scrimmage…but that’s for his post. =)
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
By being very good at that outside move, though, he makes things
more predictable for his teammates. They’re not far from this defense being a lot easier for the players to figure out than their opponents. It just takes a LITTLE better execution in a couple spots, a couple more times a game…
would of ≠ would've
Oh yes.
And those LITTLE execution spots are fewer and farther between from year one to year two.
And that makes me a happy fan.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
Yup. And when you realize that, you see that there are
a LOT of ways to make the team better, and not necessarily by addressing the obvious needs in obvious ways. They have a pretty good team concept, as is. Hell, an offensive tackle. that maybe gets them 2 or 3 first downs they otherwise wouldn’t, might just be the tipping point to make the D they HAVE into something good enough to win a playoff game or two.
Maybe all they REALLY need is another 3-4 DE, to free up Shaun Smith to anchor at the point, in rotation with Edwards. Nothing Earth-shattering, but as good or better at DE and BETTER than Toribio at NT!
would of ≠ would've
Throw in a NT that requires a double team
And that would help a TON.
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
A beast of a NT changes that equation.
So does a beast of a SOLB.
But I wouldn’t be down on Hali for run D. He’s forcing things to go a certain way by being committed, and executing at a high level on every down. If Dorsey can just do what Dorsey does, only a couple yards closer to the QB, the angles Hali’s giving up are narrowed. If the NT to Dorsey’s left shoulder is ALSO getting a yard or three more vertical, the gap inside of a deeper Dorsey is less. So Dorsey continues to honor the A#1 responsibility, which is to NOT be beaten to his inside shoulder, but the alley between Hali’s outside move and his inside shoulder is really constricted. If he can guarantee getting OUTside of the ballcarrier, then all DJ has to worry about is filling between Dorsey and Hali.
Blah blah blah. Thx for the recreation!
would of ≠ would've
100% Agreed, Mills.
See my responses to Steve above: I like Tamba getting back there. Ideally, I’d like for him to be able to stick a little closer to the line of scrimmage and eliminate the potential gap that can be created between he and Dorsey.
But yes, a stud NT makes most of this a non-relevant argument and creates a giant ripple-effect through the line.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
That's why I want a low center-of-gravity guy above all.
Hold at the point, and walk the C into the QB’s lap on passing plays. You don’t have to get there. Just clog things up and prevent the QB from climbing the pocket, when Hali forces him off his spot. I’m not looking for glamor plays from the guy, although if he can do just THAT, the occasional sack will come his way.
would of ≠ would've
And on top of that
If he doesn’t get shoved off the line with a double team against the run, we’re set.
It seems far simpler than it actually is. =)
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
Sure that's the ideal, but maybe the GOOD is served
just fine by a guy whom they MUST doubleteam to move off his spot. In my book, you don’t have to BEAT double teams to play winning football. You just have to have a couple guys that can’t be single-blocked Even if he’s only 101% of what his opposite number can handle, it STILL takes 2 players to neutralize him.
It’s not like your 50 skirmishers can defeat a line of muskets, but they’re enough to keep those 100 guys from getting to the 50-to-25 battle you have going on another part of the battlefield. Or like the crappy Russian armor against German blitzkrieg in summer 1941. Maybe you can’t win the battle yourself, but it takes a bunch of other guys to clear you out of the way, at the expense of time.
would of ≠ would've
Dammit
finite numbers in football
Russians were uncountable, and their Armour too
"We feel very strongly that our best policy is to draft the best player. This isn't fantasy football." - Ted Thompson
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 23, 2011 9:52 PM CDT up reply actions
Before they brought their guys over from East Asia,
the Krauts had ’em outnumbered big time in East Europe in ’41.
would of ≠ would've
Can you think of a rule that DOESN’T have exceptions? That doesn’t make the it “crap” or any less likely.
If someone asks you if you want extra mayonnaise you have to say yes, cus that's part of it.
-Jared Allen
by JComp11 on Mar 22, 2011 9:05 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Gravity. Ha!
Wait… planes…
Crap
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
Well played
Revenge is indeed a dish best served cold…
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
not trying to offend anyone
But Tourette’s Syndrome is not always cussing. Only about 10% of people with ts have coprolalia, the swearing tic. most people have small tics, like grunting or blinking repetitively.
Not really...
But for the purpose of this whole conversation, it was to dispell the theory that all D-line men will take 3 yrs to develop…Exceptions could just be “solid picks” couldnt they? Alot of experts thought T.Jackson was a reach…we will see.
He was 5x better last year than his rookie season
I don’t anticipate him all of a sudden not improving.
It’s very similar IMO to the Dorsey situation after his 2nd year. People said, “yeah, he got better, but he’s still only average”. They didn’t take into account the massive improvement and the fact that at his age he was going to KEEP improving.
Same thing is happening to Jackson. People are OK with him at this point, and for some asinine reason think he’s done improving despite how quickly he’s done so…
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
Alright now i see what your saying..before i thought you was just arguing
and your right. Jackson has slightly improved, but with the pick and money he got, you would expected a monster or atleast be able to consider the position was taken care of…but instead we got a “okay he needs to develop” 1st year, and then a "hurt right off the bat, and then just okay second season. I’ve been wrong a bunch in my life, and my hopes are iam wrong about him….but all signs point me to a unwise / wasted pick. Almost that whole draft that year was a waste…except Succop and one other i think…
Pick/money
Pioli wanted out of that pick BADLY, and that was well-documented. He wasn’t willing to give up more than it was worth (I believe a trade with the Lions late round pick was available, but the compensation wasn’t there), so he recognized a current/future need at RDE and took what he felt was the best pick at the time.
In retrospect, hell yeah, I’d love to have had Clay Matthews, but that’s why revisionist history exists.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
I'm still mystified why we passed on Raji though
My only theory is that either Pioli was spooked by the weed drama or he thought we had more potential NTs than DEs on the roster.
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
*shrug*
You’d have think he saw more NT prospects than DE prospects on the roster.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
But we didn't draft a NT...
I personally think he looked at our roster and didn’t see a single 3-4 DE (which could be why he took two).
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
Right, I was referring to our current roster at the time.
It seems he had high hopes for Edwards and Tank Tyler.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
Ahhh I see
I’m a little slow today… along with most other days.
I think we all had high hopes for Tank Tyler. That one hurt.
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
Which is why I don't get excited about bench numbers at the combine.
Tank Tyler was a STRONG guy, but he didn’t transition that to a 3-4 defense. Strength is key, but benching 225 a bunch of times doesn’t automatically equal a solid anchor or good interior push at the NFL level.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
no Butt
required to bench press
"We feel very strongly that our best policy is to draft the best player. This isn't fantasy football." - Ted Thompson
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 23, 2011 8:23 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah.
I just don’t typically see that and get way excited for a prospect.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
One reason why I haven't jumped on the Paea bandwagon
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
he lost that "nastiness" per Haley
Kerrigan, Ayers, A. Smith, T. Smith, G. Carimi, D. Sherrod, or P. Taylor. I'm happy with any of them.
Actually, Tyler was playing with some fire, right before he left.
And he was drawing attention, with some nice penentrations for tackles. BUT I don’t think the overall D was working all that well, because he wasn’t keeping his feet all that well.
would of ≠ would've
I just remember Haley saying something
about Tyler being Nasty out of college and he hadnt seen that from him with the Chiefs.
Kerrigan, Ayers, A. Smith, T. Smith, G. Carimi, D. Sherrod, or P. Taylor. I'm happy with any of them.
Yes. I remember that time, too.
And a couple weeks later, Tyler was looking like an All Pro 4-3 DT. Unfortunately KC needed a NT, so a couple weeks after THAT, he was gone, ironically after some of his best statistical efforts ever, IIRC. The problem was, they weren’t getting any contain, so QBs were scrambling out of the way, re-loading, and delivering down field, or scrambling. The 2010 KC D didn’t notch a jillion sacks, but their numbers were a lot better, and they looked fundamentally sound (no inside escape lanes for the QB).
would of ≠ would've
Your 100% right my friend..
I wasnt there, but you could almost feel it. But things didnt go their way, so the rest of the draft was kinda jammed up. Either way, they aced last years so who gives a F(). lol. I like Jackson, dont get me wrong, but i would have liked him better in the 2nd or 3rd round.
Yep.
Kinda sucks, but yeah, the guy would be getting far less hate around here if he was a 2nd rounder.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
I hear ya, and I think we could've done better with that pick (duh :) )
But I’d argue that he improved more than slightly last year. Granted, he was pretty bad his first year, but he was just as good as Smith last year, who gets all kinds of love around here.
My point is he improved significantly enough to reasonably assume that he’ll keep improving.
And I can’t think of anyone besides Succop and Jackson that’s been a contributor…
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
Belcher, even though he was UDFA.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
Good call
I like Belcher. Of course, if he doesn’t learn how to cover even a little this year we may have to move on…
But a very, very solid guy for an UDFA
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
That guy Darieus looks like a winner this year..
But that’s not happening. Pioli would have to offer the house to reach that high. Thats why i have had heartburn over the possibility of Paea this year….
I like the kid a lot, too.
But yeah, he’s got some large holes in his game that hurt us this year.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
it's not a rule so much as it is a reality
if you choose to avoid that reality, then that’s your right. but even if i gave you ngata (who took a couple years to develop) along with suh, you’d have 2 defensive lineman that were excellent right out of the gate while countless others have developed for a few years before dominating. it’s just the way it is most of the time.
The only players I hurt with my words are the ones who have an inflated opinion of their ability. I can't worry about that.
Bill Parcells
Knowledge is confidence. And confidence lets you play fast.
Bill Parcells
Dorsey doesn't seem to get his footing in the second example.
As you state, the second blocker didn’t need to give him the shove, he was already on the way down. Do you think that this footage gives an accurate look at how Dorsey plays?
"You gonna pull them pistols...or whistle Dixie?"
See my response to Steve.
Most of the examples that I had noted in my season breakdowns were away from the ball, and the camera angle wasn’t such that I could point to it and have it clearly seen. My basic point was that he does tend to get overpowered and doesn’t get anchored well enough, and that it can be a weakness, although the team tries to avoid it.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
As I am seriously waiting for Jackson's analysis now
Does Jackson Hold up better to the Double?
And for this matter in particular, The TE’s are what is killing our Defense. The Defense holds up well in 12t and 2nd down and the “”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NAWyQXFlcCg" target="new">flick of the wrist" the offense converts the 3rd down
"We feel very strongly that our best policy is to draft the best player. This isn't fantasy football." - Ted Thompson
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 21, 2011 8:37 PM CDT up reply actions
Yes.
He doesn’t get shoved off the line very often, in my observation. Now, on the other hand, he doesn’t really get after a single blocker like he should.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
Do we even have a true 3-4 guy on our front 3?
Dorsey is a 4-3 DT playing a 3-4 DE and Jackson just takes his guy on at the line getting no push what so ever. If the Chiefs are going to stay with a 3-4 maybe we should get some 3-4 players on the front 3 before we worry about a pass rushing OLB to help Hali. Instead of playing players out of position and hoping for the best.
Warning: If you're reading this it has been censored.
Disclaimer: Comments above are not meant to be taken with a grain of salt.
Jackson was occasionally dominant towards the end of last season
he is ascending, no doubt. His skillset and strengths match up well with 3-4 LDE, but it’s a position he didn’t play in college…he’s still learning and that shows as inconsistency.
Ryan Succop will be the kicker for the AFC in the 2011 Pro Bowl
90% of 3-4 DE's
were 4-3 DT’s. you really have to lookat a 3-4 as having 3 DT’s up front.
by RamX21 on Mar 22, 2011 7:41 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Ill be anxious to see that too...but if i were to bet
you will see him standup and stay in the same position….now that might be the plan, but i would rather see him on their side of the ball rather than neutral or back on ours.
well
"We feel very strongly that our best policy is to draft the best player. This isn't fantasy football." - Ted Thompson
Kalo, you're saying he's GOOD but not Great? right then!
awesome stuff, super breakdown, well done and did and ty, and wreck’d
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
Great is for Richard Seymour circa 2003 & 2008. -)
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
Very nice work Kalo
And it reminds me of a question I’ve had for a few months.
And I’ll preempt it with this…yes everyone, I know that Crennel hasn’t run that style of 34…
Can Dorsey be effective as a NT in a 1-gap scheme? I understand it is not the 3-4 that either Crennel or Pioli have dealt with in the past, but I also understand that Crennel, Haley, and Pioli know that you play with the hand you have.
Is our defensive potential higher with a front three of
Jackson, Dorsey, J.J. Watt
or
Jackson, Phil Taylor (or whoever), Dorsey?
I can think of solid arguments for or against both…what does everyone else think?
Ryan Succop will be the kicker for the AFC in the 2011 Pro Bowl
I'm also not too familiar with the roles in a 1-gap 34
If the NT has one A gap does an ILB have the other? and which ILB?
Ryan Succop will be the kicker for the AFC in the 2011 Pro Bowl
Short answer:
I don’t like it…and I was frankly a little scared when Haley mentioned that he thought he could run it.
If I had to choose, I prefer the second option. Let’s get a true widebody and not force Dorsey into something that puts his true talents even farther away.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
by KaloPhoenix on Mar 21, 2011 10:25 PM CDT up reply actions
Dorseys true talent is a DT in a 4-3 scheme.
But he does a good enough job at DE considering our NT situation. It pretty much forces us to get one of the top NT’s in the draft and P.Taylor is pretty much it. The rest of the guys really fit the 4-3 DT scheme, lets cross our fingers and hope we get that position addressed this with the right guy. It still pisses me off picking McCluster last year when o-line or DT could have been addressed.
Warning: If you're reading this it has been censored.
Disclaimer: Comments above are not meant to be taken with a grain of salt.
Which O-lineman or DT did you want in the second?
by theaxeeffect4721 on Mar 22, 2011 1:43 AM CDT up reply actions
I like McCluster but that guy that engulfed JC looked pretty good this past year
Kerrigan, Ayers, A. Smith, T. Smith, G. Carimi, D. Sherrod, or P. Taylor. I'm happy with any of them.
This leads to many questions for me.....
I don’t personally feel that Big Phil is a two gap NT. I feel he is a one gap NT. Kalo can you help me get through this haze? The points you made (at least I think these are the points you were making) with a strong 2 gap NT presence that would allow Dorsey more one on one situations. While I think Big Phil can create double teams I worry he can’t handle them very well and then leave us weak against the run up the gut.
On the flip side of this I can see that Big Phil creates pressure with one on one situations and then frees up Dorsey to have one on ones himself. My question Kalo would be this. For the NT we are looking for (A 2 Gap NT) is there someone that fits that bill in the later rounds? The reason I ask this is simple. If we can get a NT in the Mid rounds that can demand double teams and does well against double teams it would seem to me that would be the best case for us. It would then free up our first round pick for another position of need.
I have went back and forth and back and forth on my own answer for this question and would really like to hear your side of it.
I really would like to say one way or another.
But as is the case in most years, I’m not a huge draft buff. I think NT is a position that should be worthy of a first round talent, but a good number are later round picks that are trained appropriately, likely due to the 3-4 switch they have to make.
I do know that Phil is a big guy who could fill that role, but I trust Romeo to know/train the guy who is right for our defense.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
I understand lets say more about the philosphy that is used then.
I realize we want the perfect monster. One that can command double teams and be stout against them and then one that with one on one situations can put pressure on the QB. That is what we need. I think and hope everyone can agree to that. If we have to choose one over the other which one would it be in your opinion though?
Me, personally?
Double teams, hands down.
A NT is doubled, Dorsey’s more free to make plays, which results in more TFL’s and sacks from that position. Dorsey being an impact in that position creates a quandry for offensive line coordinators, because there’s now an entire dominant weak side to the line. On top of that, DJ and Belcher (just saying the starters last year, don’t jump on me) are free to shoot the gap and stuff the run.
While a penetrating NT would be great, I think a stout line general would create a more positive ripple effect.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
by KaloPhoenix on Mar 22, 2011 9:31 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
in theory
They command double teams BECAUSE they are disruptive. There is less reason to double team an immobile player, right?
Bottom line on Taylor… he’s a lot like Shaun Rogers… and the Chiefs wanted Rogers. And Rogers played his best in Romeo’s D.
Draft Taylor
Prediction: KC will not draft a LB before the 3rd round
by stagdsp on Mar 22, 2011 10:51 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Sure, they can.
I just have always felt more comfortable with an anchor-type NT than one that is primarily trying to get into the backfield every play…much like Dorsey does. We have Dorsey for that very reason, and having that immovable plug in the middle would be nice.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
by KaloPhoenix on Mar 22, 2011 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions
I agree, but...
Adding Taylor brings more flexibility to the DL
He’s the best NT prospect in this group, and can line up at the nose, or 3 technique.
I get the feeling that Romeo really likes the versatility in his linemen.
Besides, I don’t really see the “immovable plug” in this draft… MAYBE Powe or Williams in the 3rd round… but neither would be an immediate contributor like Taylor could be.
Prediction: KC will not draft a LB before the 3rd round
That's fine with me.
Like I said earlier, I have very little knowledge of the draft, as per usual. I can’t reference individual players, so I take the word of others in that regard.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
not to nitpick a good article, but the two clips are not both from the week 9 game against the raiders. Unless of course they changed jersey colors and the field logos at halftime.
D'oh!
Fixing…thanks, wookie.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
by KaloPhoenix on Mar 21, 2011 10:22 PM CDT up reply actions
Good read Kalo
I have a quick question though. I have seen that most of the DEs/DTs that draftniks say can play 3-4 DE are taller than Dorsey. Does Dorsey appear to have a problem with leverage or struggle with O-linemen who have longer arms than Dorsey?
by theaxeeffect4721 on Mar 22, 2011 1:48 AM CDT reply actions
I'm more of an offensive penetrator myself...
But with more than $30mil guaranteed to him, Glenn probably has to be a defensive penetrator as well.
"A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week."
Tyson Jackson was drafted to be our Anchor
That was Pioli’s plan, I think you hit the nail with the hammer on Dorsey in one on one situations, he’s a bulldozer. TJack was drafted because of his ability to handle double teams. He’s under-performing because he’s a second year kid, but this season he should be making some breakout progress. The real question is about this lockout though, because if we don’t have a season thats one less year of experience for guys like Tyson Jackson, and its one more year of age.
Good write up Kalo...BUT
On the double team segment you left out a few key points.
1. Lets talk about feet: Glenn has a very balanced stance (not staggered) and is also not putting much weight on his down hand. This is very common these days, especially on run downs. The proper technique here (most of the time, if its a read/react defense he should step the way the OL does) would be to take a 6 inch step or “power step” with the inside foot (closest to the ball). Followed immediately with another power step right the outside foot. The thinking here is taking short, choppy steps enables a DL to change direction very quickly based on which way the OL is moving. (If you remember Hard Knocks with the Chiefs a few years ago they had a segment about Tamba trying to learn this.)
2. Lets talk about hands/arms: The correct technique for a DL when he comes off the ball (in a run down, out of a balanced stance like Glenn is in) is to shoot your hands straight out in front of you. This sounds simple, but is very difficult. The most important coaching point is to not “load” your hands. In other words pretend there are strings attached to your wrists while in a stance, as soon as the first step in taken imagine your hands being pulled up by the strings. Delivering a blow has very little to do with upper body strength. Winning the point of attack is straight arms in front of loaded hips. This creates separation which is what a DL is looking for (and why GM’s look for DL with long arms). Another important point is having straight arms which enables “inside control” (something some of your wrestlers may be familiar with). Having the inside of an OL’s chest is paramount in controlling the line of scrimmage (thats why GM’s draft OL with even longer arms cause you can’t get to their chest).
So, watching Glenn in this play his first huge problem is that he hops rather than taking his power steps. This is extremely common, especially for players who haven’t been playing this technique very long. In college Glenn just straight got off the ball and wreaked havoc, no choppy steps involved. Hopping, as you may know, involves taking both your feet out of the turf for a split second…which is all an NFL OL needs to win the point of attack. When his feet reach the ground again he is already out of position with his hips extended (meaning he has exerted all of his force) and thats why you see the OL (with good hip and knee bend and driving feet) just roll his ass off the line of scrimmage. On top of hopping out of his stance he doesn’t fire his arms straight out, he loads them up, which enables the OL to have inside control immediately. Moreover, even as he makes contact with the OL he is unable to “press” him off by extending his arms which spells disaster for a DL, being belly to belly with an OL is NOT what you want no matter how big you are. The big problem here is that Glenn doesn’t hold his ground long enough to even demand a double from the LTT (this formation has an extra tackle) which results in him being up the the second level and cutting off our backside LB.
The second biggest problem is that he doesn’t even hold his gap (his only REAL job as a DE in a 3-4) and gets washed down creating a seal on the edge with a puller coming from backside to kick out the first threat which is a lazy DJ who decided that he wasn’t going to get width on that play. His job is to play with his outside half free forcing the play to the inside, instead he decided to step in and under a block and got shook. Jovan did his job by scraping behind but DJ didn’t force the play back in. This should have been about a 3-5 yard gain.
Honestly, Glenn played much better this year. But as a DL and a DL Coach I still wince about 50% of the time I watch him fire off the ball, he’s just not a professional yet. What i mean by that is that he’s not consistent, and being a professional at anything requires you to be consistently better at what you do than other people. Luckily he still has some time to “get it”. Watching Ndamakong Suh I’m literally giddy as he not only plays perfect technique but plays with a lot of intensity. I’m telling you that so you don’t think I’m a perfectionist that won’t except anything but absolute perfect form.
Anyway, hope this helps. As i watched this play more and more I got more and more upset as you can probably tell by the end of my ramblings.
"A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week."
by bigbe on Mar 22, 2011 3:52 AM CDT reply actions 9 recs
Thanks for adding the more detailed insight! Rec'd!
Yes, as I’ve said several times, Glenn is more of a “straight ahead” defender. He’ll fire off the line and try and get into the backfield every time, but when the situation calls for him to hold his ground, he’s a fish out of water. Thanks for putting it into a more detailed comment!
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
Great Great read and Thank You...
This needs to be archived somewhere and pointed back too with some other discussions.
I see it a little differently as an unschooled observer.
What jumps out at ME is that Dorsey’s trying to play 2-gap, and he’s made the transition, but what he lacks to go with it is the bull rush. I like the way you described it more intelligently. Maybe it’s because he doesn’t know how to use his hands to keep the lineman from getting into his body.
To me, it looks like a guy who’s forfeiting his one advantage, which is to pick a gap and shoot it. He is properly honoring the coaching and it takes 2 guys to keep him from being able to fill to either side of any one man in front of him. But when you’re honoring the 2 gaps, you should be getting upfield PUSH against any one guy in your face, because straight ahead and simultaneously keeping your one guy from forcing you to ONE side means that the 2-gap lineman as a pass rusher needs enough lead in his ass to walk his opposite number back QUICKLY toward the QB.
Dorsey doesn’t do that, although I would say that if he’s single-blocked, you better take a wide berth around him. His weakness is that you can keep him from getting up the field on passing downs, unless he’s been freed to shoot the gap. In this 3-tackle front, you don’t want 4-3 DTs losing their feet and giving up escape lanes. Almost-sacks that result in a lot of extended plays will KILL you on the back end, and with Hali selling-out (as his job description), Dorsey is the big man keeping things honest on that weak side. He’s KEEPING his feet and, 1-on-1, he’s honoring both his gaps, which is paramount. And any time the offense uses 2 hats to move him out of the way, he’s doing his job, imo.
So, to MY imperfect eye, Dorsey’s a very talented under tackle who’s doing a very serviceable job at RDE, and his only real weakness is he gets stood up and stalled out, because he can’t simultaneously honor his gaps AND force the blocker back into the QB. This is a pure lead-in-the-ass, straight-ahead power issue.
I think his height IS a disadvantage as a wall-forming DE on passing downs. He has to leave his feet in order to give the QB much problem throwing over him. It’s something Jackson can do while he takes his “choppy steps,” but Dorsey’s obliged to leave his feet and elevate, and the second he leaves his feet to get in the way of the pass, he has no leverage, as you say. And maybe you’re seeing it better than I do. I make the distinction between that and just pure bull rush. And maybe you’re noticing him leaving his feet, and are interpreting it one way, whereas I’m seeing a guy that didn’t get much push beFORE he took his best shot at affecting the play/pass and went up for the ball. He just wasn’t very far up the field beFORE you saw him leave his feet, and it was this lack of initial penetration that highlighted what happened later, to YOUR eyes.
would of ≠ would've
I'm confused, I don't think we are watching the same video.
Which video are we talking about? My post was just on the double team.
Also, what I said in my previous post has everything to do with the points you are making. Without proper technique in getting off the ball you are just a waste of skin on the DL. When Glenn doesn’t shoot his hands or use short power steps he is making his job that much harder to do and many times will be leaving his LBs out to dry by losing one or both of his gaps. I’m not saying it should be perfect every time, but he has to except his job which is just to kick the tackle’s ass and play two gaps.
Your comment about getting upfield push when getting single blocked is confusing, are we talking run or pass play?
On a run play his job, if single blocked, is to stay square to the LOS while dominating the man he is lined up on. On a pass play his job varies depending on the package and blitzes/stunts. Generally though gap responsibility on a pass play is limited to one gap (so he would rush the B gap or the C gap most likely) so his job of clogging those two gaps switches to rushing the passer in his assigned gap (based on the defense called).
Bull rushing in the NFL is in one simple word DIFFICULT. Only the biggest baddest DL in the NFL can get away with it on the inside (Richard Seymour comes to mind), Glenn is not one of those…yet. Part of the problem for Glenn is play recognition, to get a good get-off and bull rush somebody you must instantly diagnose the play (run or pass). So its not as easy as saying he’s not tall enough/strong enough/heavy enough. I agree though that he struggles pass rushing, mostly due to his height and sorry to beat a dead horse but his technique. He just mashes himself up against the OL which allows them to swallow him up and hold.
When i talked about him leaving his feet I was talking about him hopping in the second video, instead of taking short power steps he kind of hops and crosses his feet which gets him “mushed” (thats an industry word for rolled up, pancaked, blown off the ball, etc…lol). He does this at the same time he doesn’t extend his arms which results in the OL locking onto him. Let me point out how important it is to keep your feet beneath you when play DL. Glenn Dorsey was a 5th overall pick, the pride of the SEC, one of the best DL in the past decade and he got dominated by a rookie from a Division II school because he had poor technique. The 2nd man of the double team (#70) didn’t even touch him because he was getting pushed back so quickly so he got right up to the 2nd level. I would not consider that doing his job.
I think we can all agree that he’s not some specimen of a man who can just run amok in the NFL so its time for him start playing with more consistency. I’m not saying he’s bad, he played well at times but with the money we are giving him he needs to be doing his job every snap of every game…and making some plays when he can.
Maybe clarify which video you were talking about and I could give you a better response that might help you understand what I’m trying to get at with my first post.
"A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week."
I'm just speaking from watching entire games.
I’m sure your examples are fine, but the animation didn’t work on my ’puter.
I’ll look for the hop-step, of which you speak. And I’m not looking for penetration from him, so much, when it’s a pass play against the base D on 1st and 2nd down. And it looks to my uneducated eye like in those situations, Hali is coming, as usual, and the D is scheming for Dorsey to honor the 2 gaps, so that Hali is FREE to just pin his ears back. Analyzing his pass rush from THAT perspective, when he IS being swallowed up, as you say, he ought to be marching that lineman straight back into the QB. This is a pure power thing, to me.
So it seems to me that you’re thinking Dorsey isn’t penetrating, when to me, it seems like that wasn’t necessarily his assignment. He was supposed to tie up a blocker, and, against the pass, move that guy’s ass backwards. Instead, he gets stood up. But he’s STILL honoring his 2 gaps. The KC pass rush was MUCH better at keeping the contain on the QB in 2010. They weren’t all trying to singlehandedly notch a sack, but they were controlling what little ground they gained, and about all they needed to dominate was eat more ground than they were eating. Just a pure PUSH thing.
Dorsey was drafted as a penetrating 4-3 DT, likely at the insistence of Gunther Cunningham. Very very athletic for a true widebody, he’s still learning how to play a more powerful, mundane style of football. I’m hoping the next level for him is more sheer bull rush, but it might not be in his DNA.
would of ≠ would've
I didn't mention anything about his lack of penetration
We are on the same page, except for the fact that by playing really poor technique he is making it hard to be a two gap player. Thats all i was getting at. Taking poor steps and not getting extension with the arms makes it tough to demand a double team because you’re blocking yourself. Being short doesn’t help his cause.
And I would disagree with your statement that when he gets stood up he is honoring his gaps. Being in a full extended position (i’m talking hips here, not arms) gives you zero ability to cover any gap because in all likelhood you won’t be able to shed that block because you aren’t able to generate force.
Agreed that the pass rush was better at containing…but is still weak at rushing. Watch the Steelers DEs rush the passer and that will sum up where I want Glenn to be right now.
"A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week."
I sorta thought you did, when you were talking about lack of pressure from D-Line.
I just put words around what it looks like, to me. By the sounds of it, you could actually be of some help to Dorsey, himself, in getting what I’d like to see out of him. Heh. But I still think he’s harder to get around/past than you seem to be giving him credit for. His best natural advantage is something I don’t think they ask from him very much, but he seems to have embraced doing his best at what they’re asking of him. For all I know (which is little), he gets locked-up and fails to advance because the one thing coach will not tolerate is a QB escaping up through the A gap, and if the NT isn’t getting up the field, Dorsey can’t press any advantage he might have to the G’s outside shoulder, without sacrificing the inside seal.
Questions like this can keep ignorant guys like me entertained for HOURS! Heh.
would of ≠ would've
Nice post Kalo, rec'd.
Dorsey’s come a long ways. Hopefully he continues to improve. I’m very, very, very interested in the Edwards and T-Jax posts…
I’m one of those who believes Jackson is underrated at this point, and with a better NT (at least, better over the entire game. Big Ron wore down) I believe our line has the potential to be a great D-Line…
I’m curious to see if your analysis confirms this.
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
Yes and yes, MN. =)
But I’ll get to them soon enough.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
agree on Jackson
Kerrigan, Ayers, A. Smith, T. Smith, G. Carimi, D. Sherrod, or P. Taylor. I'm happy with any of them.
I also think he's underrated. I REALLY want to see a DANGEROUS physical presence on his left shoulder in the base D.
In the base 3-4 and the nickel. We saw a little of that with Hali switching sides. Trouble with that was the guy in Hali’s place wasn’t Hali. Chiefs are in a good year to get another very good ’tweener or two, without having to make a 1st-round Kerrigan pick, and slowly upgrade NT without having to make a 1st-round Taylor pick.
would of ≠ would've
T-Jax is very, very strong
His rookie year he was often getting washed out of plays. while I didn’t see him get much penetration this year (and by that, I mean none), but I also hardly ever saw him get shoved out of plays.
If he keeps improving at the rate he has for even just another year, he’ll be an excellent starter.
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
He was looking like a dominating player in Game 1.
The issue to ME is whether he gets back to 100%. He wasn’t throwing himself around laterally NEAR as much after he came back from the knee. Either he lost something, or he was playing to be able to come back and fight another day, without putting too severe a pressure on that knee. When they EASED him back into the lineup, it was pure straight-ahead short yardage stuff, where he looked like the strongest man on the field, but it was pure straight ahead. I think we were JUST starting to see some side-to-side towards the tail end of the season, but yes, I feel like he’s a physically dominant player, if he comes back at 100%.
16 starts as a rookie say he has some toughness, but, again, it looked like he was playing to not get hurt, that rookie year, as if he were being coached first of all to protect his legs and keep his feet, while he learned to play with the big boys. The SCARY part is that the one regular season game where I saw him playing at the top of his game, he DID get hurt. But that’s maybe just me coming up with a story to suit what I want my eyes to tell me.
would of ≠ would've
Oh yeah.
Mills has talked about that several times this year. He should be much more hurt than he was. That was a NASTY injury, and I know Mills was one of the people that sort of gave Jackson a pass while he was coming back because of it.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
by KaloPhoenix on Mar 23, 2011 10:42 PM CDT up reply actions
Yup. I was just summing up my fears.
The one game where I saw TJ as a dominant force was that one game against the Chargers. Coming back off the near-catastrophic injury he showed dominant straight ahead power, but wasn’t really testing that knee with a lot of lateral pressure. Seemed like they were protective of him by what they asked of him, especially the first games back.
would of ≠ would've
I hope your right and that he comes back finally 100%
Because he looked fantastic against SD
I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.
I agree. Part of the wall denying Rivers much to his right side was the pair of blockers Jackson was taking up the field with him.
I’m still weighing in my mind whether he’s slow to fire off on regular D, but I KNOW he CAN fire off, from watching him in short yardage. It just seems like it takes him an extra beat to take it upfield on regular D when the pass play is called on 1st or 2nd. I’m new enough to 3-4 and his role in it to not be certain that that’s not what he’s supposed to be doing. On the one hand, it seems like he’s slow outta the blocks, but on the other, it seems to be highly disruptive, like he’s waiting for the OL to commit and THEN wrong-footing people.
would of ≠ would've
Was this on the front page?
If so HOW DID I MISS IT!
REC…but you know thats an easy one.
I expect the Chiefs to have a good but unexpected draft. My thought for the First Round 2011 draft. The Chiefs Draft Ryan Mallet Qb or Julio Jones WR. DTD 2 Mar 2011
Agreed - I didn't see it either, which makes me think it wasn't
If not, it should be .
The whole problem with the world is that fools & fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. ~ Bertrand Russell
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Mar 23, 2011 7:12 PM CDT up reply actions
This will stay as a FanPost only series for now.
There’s no problems with that. If anything, it increases its longevity.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
hmm...that's true, and a good reason for it to be a FanPost
But can’t The Man (i.e., Joel/Chris) put a FanPost on the front page AND it stays in the Rec’d section – then we have the best of both worlds.
/the man’s always holding us down
The whole problem with the world is that fools & fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. ~ Bertrand Russell
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Mar 24, 2011 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions
Not the case here.
I have the ability to post to the front page as a contributor. I’m leaving it here for now.
"Now you can luxuriate in a nice jail cell, but if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you." -- Malcolm Reynolds
by KaloPhoenix on Mar 28, 2011 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions

by 

































