| Sign Up | Google+

Will Jax lose on purpose?

We are all familiar with the idea of losing games for a chance at Andrew Luck, but John Clayton proposed a new twist in his latest column on espn.com today.

If the Jaguars lose to Indy this week, it will almost surely cost the Colts Luck (or the bounty of draft picks they could get in trade for him. Maybe they lie down... Having watched Peyton Manning dominate their division for the last decade, making sure the Colts don't have a chance to repeat the story with Luck might be enough to be worth it. The coach in Jax probably won't get the permanent job anyway (unlike our own coach who is playing for his future here...)

Throwing games in the NFL is considered a big taboo because it sends horrible signals to your team and fans and can also be detrimental to already short playing careers and already short-leashed coaching jobs, but in this case it could change the entire course of history in the AFC South. It might just be worth the Jags' effort.

What does everyone think? Would you want to take a loss if it meant, for example, that SD would lose Rivers and Gates if you do it?

                                                                                                                                                                                                               

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.

Recent FanPosts

View All Fan Posts

The Next FanPosts

There are 21 Comments. Load Now. Loading

Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.

C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read

R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next

Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read

Comment Settings

Live comment alert: Hide it!

Comments for this post are closed.

tracking_pixel_5341_tracker tracking_pixel_5351_tracker