You know what really grinds my gears? The whole “I don’t want Matt Barkley ‘cuz USC QB’s suck” argument. I just….I don’t….I can’t even get words out this is such a ridiculous argument that I seem to hear every day. So who? RGIII? Ok sure, he seems like a fine prospect, and from the rich tradition of Baylor QB’s that have lit up the NFL? How come that doesn’t matter? Just because there has been A LOT of QB’s from USC because it is consistently one of the best recruiting schools they churn out a couple of John David Booty’s and all of a sudden USC QB’s all suck? ...and why does this only affect QB’s? I’ve never heard anyone say something like “Oh man, stay away from Justin Blackmon, because Oklahoma State WR’s suck”. It’s not like USC has some crazy gimmicky offense that doesn’t translate to the NFL. We haven’t had an NFL caliber QB in like 10 years and we could be in the position to get one, but that’s a bad idea because he came from a School that once featured Matt Leinart? If Barkley is on the board when we are in the position to take him, I personally like the fact he comes from a good school like USC and last I saw plays in the same conference as Andrew Luck. I’m not saying Barkley is as good as Luck, but because Luck comes from a program that featured John Elway and Barkley came from a program that featured JD Booty, Luck rules and Barkley sucks? I just don’t get it.