Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage of 2012 Coke 600

Bengals, Raiders Getting Close To Carson Palmer Trade

The Oakland Raiders are hosting the Kansas City Chiefs this weekend and after losing Jason Campbell to a broken collarbone in Week 6, the Raiders have been looking for a number of quarterbacks. Reportedly, they reached out to guys like Carson Palmer, Todd Collins and plan to work out Todd Bouman.

The big name in that group is Palmer, the quarterback who told the Cincinnati Bengals last summer that he would retire if the team didin't trade him. The thinking was that the Bengals would hold firm and refuse to trade him.

That was the thinking until the Raiders apparently offered a first round pick for his services. Jay Glazer of FOX Sports reports that the Bengals and Raiders are nearing a deal that would send Palmer to Oakland for a 2012 first round pick. ESPN's Chris Mortensen follows it up saying it also involves a 2013 conditional pick that could turn into another first rounder with incentives and playing time. 

Wow.

This would be a stunning move if it happens (and it sounds like it will). Still, it's hard to see Palmer playing this weekend against the Chiefs, or at least being effective, considering he hasn't been on the practice field with an NFL team since since the end of the 2010 season.

Comment 119 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Arrowhead Pride

Caption This

Apr 2012 by Joel Thorman - 81 comments

Comments

Display:

This doesn't scare me too much.

He really hasn’t been an effective NFL quarterback since his surgery. That and the fact that they could be dropping two first round picks for him…

by CapnCribbs on Oct 18, 2011 9:23 AM CDT reply actions  

Agreed but they don't have any 1st rounders

Good things is the Raiders will suck down the road given up all their 1st in future years

by Chiefs3188 on Oct 18, 2011 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

And if they have a legit QB for years?

Palmer is only a few years older than the chump we’re stuck with

Standing on the corner in a white Godfather hat. He drives a long black gangster Cadillac. He can steal a broads mind, man, in three or four minutes. It’s not how long you talk, brother, it’s what you put in it.

by HIV 2 Elway on Oct 18, 2011 9:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

So you're saying Palmer played at a higher level than Cassel the last few years?

Completely disagree. Before his surgery was one thing, but afterwards he did absolutely nothing. Not like he’s just surrounded with weapons in Oakland anyway.

by CapnCribbs on Oct 18, 2011 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think Palmer is better.

I thought last year that if Plamer was in Cassel’s spot last year thie offense would have been much better. He might not have had quite the same TD to Int ratio, but the passing game would have been much better.

I guess we will find out because Oakland has a great ruynning game, and I think Plamer makes them a better team.

The views expressed by craig in calgary do not necessarily represent the views of all Canadians.

by saskwatch on Oct 18, 2011 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

I always thought Palmer was a stud early on.

I think the past few years has been a bad situation for him having to deal with a bad team. Or a few bad players on the team anyway. Not saying the surgery didn’t hurt him, just saying Ocho Diloe and company made it hard on him IMO. I also think IMO, this is an upgrade for the Raiders. Hopefully not this week, but later in the season when Palmer gets it going.

"We couldn't beat the Chiefs, but we damn near killed their horse"
John Madden 1975 Chiefs-42 Raiders-10

by Chiefs_40 on Oct 18, 2011 9:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not surrounded with weapons?

DHB has been looking awesome this year. Jacoby Ford ran up over a hundred yards against us last year. I would say Jacoby and DHB are as good as OCHO and Houshmanzadeh were

Come at me bro, and I will throw a 2 yard screen pass to my running back, come at me bro.

by Kblomfiee on Oct 18, 2011 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

This just opens a window for success - albeit a somewhat small window

Kind of like a team that thinks they have all the pieces and just needs that one more to fill the perceived “gap”. Go and bet the farm that it’s true and hope for the best. They’ll have a window of time with Palmer and Seymour before they’re done… while DMC is still fast and semi-healthy, and maybe the WR corps can solidify, i.e., guys like Schilens get/stay healthy and DHB can chip the rest of the concrete off of his hands.

They will have a potent offense if Palmer pans out. They will have a solid front 7 against the run and a good pass rush.

Their secondary is still extremely questionable and their LBs are suspect against the pass. A good pass rush can help mitigate that to an extent.

Last but not least – Palmer will make his share of dumb mistakes, just like Cassel. Palmer is good, but I feel like he slipped from elite status a few years ago and never really got it back. So we’ll just have to see. Palmer isn’t done in this league and while I would prefer he came back to a team other than Oakland, I’m not going to shit the bed worrying about him being a world-beater there.

by Ochophosphate on Oct 18, 2011 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

Betting the farm?

A 2012 1st rounder. Meh, that is not the farm. We have Tyson Jackson, a player that’s injured, for the last 2 years. If Palmer comes in and plays decent for 3 or 4 years, its well worth it.

Come at me bro, and I will throw a 2 yard screen pass to my running back, come at me bro.

by Kblomfiee on Oct 18, 2011 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

It’s only a 2nd first rounder if the move pays off. Good trade for the Raiders.

"Hater" is a term used by weak-minded people in the face of legitimate criticism.

by JComp11 on Oct 18, 2011 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

How?

They won’t make any sb run and w no money and no draft picks to better themselves for the future. Terrible trade

by KCinIL on Oct 18, 2011 10:48 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

If you consider what they have at their disposal and not looking at the Palmer trade in a vacuum

couple it with the Seymour trade and other picks they’ve given up.

They’re basically saying they won’t be pulling much from the draft next year and possibly the next – they’re betting that what they have now along with some supplementary players will be enough to get them where they’re going. If they can afford it, I would expect them to pursue a quality CB this offseason in an attempt to complete the puzzle.

by Ochophosphate on Oct 18, 2011 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Giving away all these draft picks is eventually going to catch up with Oakland

How many good players under 25 do they have right now?

Check out my blog on software development:
http://www.turnleafdesign.com/

by Scaryclouds on Oct 18, 2011 9:27 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

If this trade goes through..

Will the Raiders have any draft picks in 2012… maybe a 7th rounder and some(or a) comp pick(s)?

Go Chiefs!!!!

by ravenhawk on Oct 18, 2011 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

This is a great move for the Raiders.

They are a better team than they were before.

Everybody says Palmer is washed up, but I think that is wrong. He is no longer a top 3 QB in the NFL, but still very good. People were saying last year he was bad, but in reality he was just bad for Palmer.

Last year he was 30 yards short of 4000 and had 26 TD. He threw 20 Int, but he was forceing a lot of balls because they were always losing.

Give him an excellent running game, and Plamer will shred you with play action.

The views expressed by craig in calgary do not necessarily represent the views of all Canadians.

by saskwatch on Oct 18, 2011 9:27 AM CDT reply actions  

Agree, got to tip your hat to teams trying to make moves too

Raiders see they have an oppertunity to win the division and they’re going for it.

Standing on the corner in a white Godfather hat. He drives a long black gangster Cadillac. He can steal a broads mind, man, in three or four minutes. It’s not how long you talk, brother, it’s what you put in it.

by HIV 2 Elway on Oct 18, 2011 9:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

The only reason he had almost 4000 yards was because he threw it so much.

He had the fourth most passing attempts in the NFL last year, so it’s not surprising he got a lot of yards.

by wustl_chiefs_fan on Oct 18, 2011 9:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes

But this is all new to him. He didn’t have an offseason to prepare and learn the playbook. Also he hasn’t even played with any NFL players since 2010 (that we know of). Whose he going to be throwing to? I guess he just has to throw it to the endzone every time and hope his speedsters can catch up to it.

I eat success for breakfast....with skim milk.

by ChiefRoyal on Oct 18, 2011 9:32 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

I don't think Palmer is washed up at all.

He is probably waiting for a chance to go into a ready made situation like the one in Oakland. This could make Oakland a very dangerous football team.

"The Hammer"

by G.L. on Oct 18, 2011 9:29 AM CDT reply actions  

Agree, Palmer still has it

He was making chicken salad out of chicken shit in Cincinasty, will be interesting to see how he does with a real running game

Standing on the corner in a white Godfather hat. He drives a long black gangster Cadillac. He can steal a broads mind, man, in three or four minutes. It’s not how long you talk, brother, it’s what you put in it.

by HIV 2 Elway on Oct 18, 2011 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

I hope he doesn't play this weekend.

I would rather see Boller than Palmer on 5 days notice.

I really think this gives Oakland the leg up on winning the division.

The running game will be very good, and Palmer will hit some big plays down field on play action.

The views expressed by craig in calgary do not necessarily represent the views of all Canadians.

by saskwatch on Oct 18, 2011 9:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think there's a chance he plays this weekend if he signs

No clue about the offense, scheme, calls, terminology… unfamiliar with WR’s, RB’s, O-line.

Anyone they’re looking for this week is either to provide depth or to be a future starter. In the case of Palmer, it’s looking for a future starter. In the case of Collins and others, it’s someone to provide depth and challenge Boller because you can’t expect Pryor to fill that role at this time.

If they snag Palmer, we don’t see him until our next game at home – and I can live with that.

by Ochophosphate on Oct 18, 2011 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, no way he plays this week.

But down the road, I think he makes Oakland a much better team. Palmer with a running game? To me that’s a scary thought.

"The Hammer"

by G.L. on Oct 18, 2011 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

He had a running game in Cincy last year and it didn't matter

He also had an outstanding WR corps, a good TE and a young, improving D.

Look at Cincy this year – other than dropping Johnson, TO and Palmer – what has changed? They ditched two WR’s and picked up Green, ditched Palmer and snagged Dalton. Other than that, not a whole helluva lot.

IMO Cincy looks much better as a team this year than they did last year and they’ve got a bright future.

by Ochophosphate on Oct 18, 2011 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

He was 6th in league in passing.

The views expressed by craig in calgary do not necessarily represent the views of all Canadians.

by saskwatch on Oct 18, 2011 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Which solidifies my point

Your initial point was that he would now have a running game, implying that he didn’t last year. I was just pointing out that he did in fact have a decent running game last year. Oakland has a better ground game than Cincy did last year, but it’s not like they were garbage on the ground.

Cincy is a better team now than last year and the pieces are largely the same.

by Ochophosphate on Oct 18, 2011 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

Johnson and TO have proved that he had nothing to throw to last year.

Johnson can’t even get the ball thrown to him in the most pass happy offense in the league, and TO couldn’t find a job.

The views expressed by craig in calgary do not necessarily represent the views of all Canadians.

by saskwatch on Oct 18, 2011 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

TO and Johnson this year are irrelevant to last year if we're talking about Palmer

Disregard TO and Johnson – look at the guys that were behind them (which Palmer found often toward the end of the season) – Caldwell, Shipley, Simpson, Gresham – they had some good depth at WR and a good TE. TO and Johnson still put up near 1000 yards each.

As you point out above – Palmer still managed to be 6th in the league in passing with that group of WRs.

Furthermore – are you saying that Oaklands WR corps is better? I honestly don’t think it is.

TO can’t find a job because he tore his ACL in the offseason and is still rehabbing. Johnson is faltering.

by Ochophosphate on Oct 18, 2011 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Even if he does play this weekend

Hopefully we can count on his unfamiliarity of the offense and players to help us out a bit.

by RA_ChiefsFan on Oct 18, 2011 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hahaha

I’m glad to see the Raiders are making dumb moves even without Al Davis

by stagdsp on Oct 18, 2011 9:30 AM CDT reply actions  

Come on man

This is a very good move for the Raiders. Draft picks are used to make the team beyyer, and they did just that. Plus the shot at Al is ridiculous since he built this core who are a lot better than our core.

More I read about Davis after his death, more respect I give him.

by craig in calgary on Oct 18, 2011 9:51 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Besides, now it is going to be a bottom 10 pick, because I think the Raiders are going to the playoffs.

The views expressed by craig in calgary do not necessarily represent the views of all Canadians.

by saskwatch on Oct 18, 2011 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's going to be tough for them to make the playoffs still

Unless they can pass the Chargers and take the West – which, even if the Chargers are squeaking by and not looking very good – they have a tendency to play strong late in the season, it won’t be easy.

To snag a wild card you’ll have to hope Buffalo craps out… cause the East is still strong. You’ll always have Pitt and Baltimore battling for spots in the North.

So they either need to topple San Diego or put up a killer record to snag a wild card. At this point I think their odds of making the playoffs are about as good as ours. And if we win this weekend we will basically be dead even.

by Ochophosphate on Oct 18, 2011 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed - the only questionable piece is the compensation

That’s a high price for Palmer, but he’s by far the best option for a “fix” at that position compared to what else is available.

As far as adding Palmer – it’s a great move. What they give up will determine the level of risk involved.

by Ochophosphate on Oct 18, 2011 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

I honestly don't think Palmer has much left

they might as well have gotten McNabb… we all see how well he worked out… and Philly didn’t get 2 #1s for him!

by stagdsp on Oct 18, 2011 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

I guess we'll see

I personally think Palmer still has some juice left in the tank at 31.
Sure he’s struggled the last 2 years, but he was throwing to tweetle dee and tweetle dum.
H/T saskwatch

by craig in calgary on Oct 18, 2011 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

Wow....

I just about spat out my breakfast. Thier ‘core’ players are not only better than our, but they’re ‘a whole lot better’.
Wow. I’m just not even going to got into it and I feel cheapened that I even responded to this comment.
I normally love to read your stuff, but this….. wow

by Lokrath on Oct 18, 2011 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

You don't think they are a better team right now?

They’ve beat us 3 out of the last 4 games we’ve played since the Pioli/Haley era.

I’m not sure why that was breakfast spit-out-worthy. I just like how their team is built, from the inside-out.

by craig in calgary on Oct 18, 2011 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

Rumor has it...

It could be 2012 1st Round pick… And a 2013 1st Round Pick

H/T R2J

There is a fly in the ointment. The sh*t has hit the fan. The lion will speak.

by R2J_24 on Oct 18, 2011 9:30 AM CDT reply actions  

I love it

He hasn’t played/practiced all year. He certainly won’t be a factor this weekend, if at all. And the Raiders 2012 draft is complete dog shit. Hahahahahahaha!

by Chiefs447 on Oct 18, 2011 9:31 AM CDT reply actions  

So... this would pretty much mean the end of Campbell's season... and career in Oakland

That sucks… break your collar bone and that’s that.

It will be interesting to see how this all unfolds.

by Ochophosphate on Oct 18, 2011 9:32 AM CDT reply actions  

This will meen a possible QB controversy in Oakland!

Campbell is a good QB and needs to be in the same system for several years. I think if Campbell is traded away after this year it will hurt Oakland more then help in the long run. Palmer is good but only has a couple of years left and Campbell is younger and with a lot more upside.

by LocoGonzo on Oct 18, 2011 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

In 12 years Palmer has only played the full season in 5 of those years

In 2006 his rating was 92.9 and steadily declined to 82.4 in 2010

Compound that with the fact that he’ll be 32 years old in December and barring any further injury, the Raiders can use him for what 3,4,5 years, maybe?

It would be a good move IF the Bengals weren’t wanting the first round pick as well as additional picks for a 32 year old QB that may or may not play a full season moving forward.

ROOT with your heart.
ANALYZE with your head.

by THE_TRUTH on Oct 18, 2011 9:34 AM CDT reply actions  

I heard it is a 1st rounder in 2012 and a conditional in 2013 which could end up being a 1st rounder….seems like a lot for a qb that hasnt played all season

by chiefsfan on Oct 18, 2011 9:35 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Glad to see Al Davis left instructions on how to run the team.

1) If a former first round pick becomes available through free agency or a trade, make it happen no matter the cost.

2) Always draft the fastest player available on your board when it is your turn to pick (if you have any picks)

The views expressed by craig in calgary do not necessarily represent the views of all Canadians.

by saskwatch on Oct 18, 2011 9:35 AM CDT reply actions  

ha ha....

Come at me bro, and I will throw a 2 yard screen pass to my running back, come at me bro.

by Kblomfiee on Oct 18, 2011 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

Wow, a 1st rounder for a washed-up player who's been sitting on his ass for months?

Are you kidding me? This is hilarious. Carson used to be good, but he never took control of that team in Cincinatti. The idea of him with the Raiders doesn’t scare me much, no matter how good their running game is.

"Toby has been cruising for a bruising for years, and I am now his cruise director. And my name, is Captain Bruising."

by bobby sippio! on Oct 18, 2011 9:37 AM CDT reply actions  

Carson used to be good, but he never took control of that team in Cincinatti.

The head coach couldn’t take control, how was the QB supposed to?

"Hater" is a term used by weak-minded people in the face of legitimate criticism.

by JComp11 on Oct 18, 2011 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Seriously

Carson Palmer needs to complete his retirement paperwork tomorrow for the ultimate trolling.

by NotAGoodName on Oct 18, 2011 9:37 AM CDT reply actions  

We got Cassel for a 2nd

Is Palmer that much better? I know Cassel isn’t that great but Palmer?

by Chiefs3188 on Oct 18, 2011 9:39 AM CDT reply actions  

didnt we get cassel and vrabel for a second or how did we end up with vrabel

by chiefsfan on Oct 18, 2011 9:42 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

correct...both for a 2nd.

What's the difference between jelly and jam?

by WestonK on Oct 18, 2011 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Woah...

let’s not get crazy.

What's the difference between jelly and jam?

by WestonK on Oct 18, 2011 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

i agree 100%

2010 AFC WEST CHAMPION KANSASSS CITY CHIEFFFFFSSSSSS

by Bleedzredngold on Oct 18, 2011 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Who is the smart team in this deal?

Has to go to Cinci for knowing some team was going to be desperate before week six. Took a lot for me to say that.

"We couldn't beat the Chiefs, but we damn near killed their horse"
John Madden 1975 Chiefs-42 Raiders-10

by Chiefs_40 on Oct 18, 2011 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes they are!

Cincy already looks to have their QB of thr future in Dalton and a young, strong core of receivers. With another 1st rounder next year and a possible one the year after. They could be a force to deal with for a long time!

by LocoGonzo on Oct 18, 2011 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

That was also a move during the offseason

During the season, when team’s are desperate, you can demand more

Standing on the corner in a white Godfather hat. He drives a long black gangster Cadillac. He can steal a broads mind, man, in three or four minutes. It’s not how long you talk, brother, it’s what you put in it.

by HIV 2 Elway on Oct 18, 2011 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ooops.

Didn’t see your comment. I pretty much said the same thing. My bad.

"We couldn't beat the Chiefs, but we damn near killed their horse"
John Madden 1975 Chiefs-42 Raiders-10

by Chiefs_40 on Oct 18, 2011 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think Cambell is gonna be pissed

Only those who attempt the absurd will achieve the impossible.
Escher, M.C.

by motrepip on Oct 18, 2011 9:39 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Wow, I hope he plays this weekend.

Palmer was a pick-six machine last year.

by FreshPhillyD23 on Oct 18, 2011 9:41 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

How is Oakland going to fit him under the cap.

They will be responsible for over half of his $11 million, and were they not right up against the cap all ready?

Do they have to cut somebody to make room, r can they rework enough deals to stay under? This could get interesting.

The views expressed by craig in calgary do not necessarily represent the views of all Canadians.

by saskwatch on Oct 18, 2011 9:41 AM CDT reply actions  

Never know!

Could be some people may get released. If Palmer does good it could be Campbell.

by LocoGonzo on Oct 18, 2011 11:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Negotiation with the Raiders...

Raiders: We’ll give you a 6th round pick for Palmer.
Bengals: Well, I don’t…
Radiers: OK! OK! TWO FIRST ROUNDERS!
Bengals: Uh…ok?

What's the difference between jelly and jam?

by WestonK on Oct 18, 2011 9:43 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

wow

Everyone is looking at me cause I just laughed outoud to this one Hahaha

by kcchiefsfan on Oct 18, 2011 9:57 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

yeah me too, funny

Come at me bro, and I will throw a 2 yard screen pass to my running back, come at me bro.

by Kblomfiee on Oct 18, 2011 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ok, Ok, two first rounders...ha ha

Come at me bro, and I will throw a 2 yard screen pass to my running back, come at me bro.

by Kblomfiee on Oct 18, 2011 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

And not one pick less.

"We couldn't beat the Chiefs, but we damn near killed their horse"
John Madden 1975 Chiefs-42 Raiders-10

by Chiefs_40 on Oct 18, 2011 10:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hats off to the Cinci "brass"

A first round pick for a retired player? A guy who refuses to play?

That’s some kinda’ sweet deal.

Can we get off this "Suck4Luck" bullshit? Actually WANTING us to lose? Seriously...WTF???

by Scott B. on Oct 18, 2011 9:43 AM CDT reply actions  

Great move for us

Raiders are stuck w what they got for years now. Dude is not good anymore. Not in football shape turnover machine and a hit away from IR. 2 1rst rounders? Atta boy Raiders!

by KCinIL on Oct 18, 2011 9:46 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

How many Raiders executives does it take on draft day?

None. They don’t have any picks left…)

In Todd We Trust!

by MahiMike on Oct 18, 2011 9:47 AM CDT reply actions  

This is out of control I do not mind this at all. Palmer is getting up there in age and who knows if he is still effective. The Raiders have to take on all of his contract and oh yeah, GIVING UP 2 1st ROUNDERS!! Well that conditional 1st round pick depends on his performance.

by danmang on Oct 18, 2011 9:52 AM CDT reply actions  

2 First round picks

That is a good thing. He is good, but not that good.

by MTChiefFan on Oct 18, 2011 9:52 AM CDT reply actions  

Can we get two firsts for Cassel?

Can we get off this "Suck4Luck" bullshit? Actually WANTING us to lose? Seriously...WTF???

by Scott B. on Oct 18, 2011 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

Only the Raiders

would give a 1st round pick for Palmer. Al’s smiling somewhere.

by Fidelis86 on Oct 18, 2011 9:53 AM CDT reply actions  

@AdamSchefter Adam Schefter

Carson Palmer to the Raiders now official. Compensation expected to be a 1 in 2012 and a conditional 1 in 2013.

ROOT with your heart.
ANALYZE with your head.

by THE_TRUTH on Oct 18, 2011 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

This is a terribe trade

I think 1 first round pick for Palmer is too much. Guy is shot as his arm is not nearly what it was. He should have had Tommy John surgery.

by golfbard on Oct 18, 2011 9:58 AM CDT reply actions  

Not sure how yall could think this is good for us.

a) Number 1 goal is to stop the running game so added personel is needed in the box
b) Now have a QB who can take the top off the secondary, and speedy WR’s
c) Our secondary has been prone to give up big plays in the passing game

I don’t like this 1 bit.

by craig in calgary on Oct 18, 2011 10:00 AM CDT reply actions  

That makes 2 of us.

I thought that Oakland was going to be a problem with Campbell, and this is much more problematic.

The views expressed by craig in calgary do not necessarily represent the views of all Canadians.

by saskwatch on Oct 18, 2011 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

Palmer's arm is shot

You have to see him for what he is now, not what he was. He’s not the same QB.

by golfbard on Oct 18, 2011 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

He hasn't been that QB since the steeper playoff game

No need to worry. A statue that throws to the other team as much as his.

by KCinIL on Oct 18, 2011 10:02 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

A first and maybe another first?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Gotta love the incredibly stupid trades our division makes. Mike Brown’s ass got real lucky.

by The_Bernard_Pollard_Rule on Oct 18, 2011 10:03 AM CDT reply actions  

They have an awesome team though

Physical tough defense….a CONSISTENT top ranked rushing game, and now if Palmer works out they have a top tier qb. I don’t like it. Although I do kiinda like that they gave up a f and another conditional #1.

Come at me bro, and I will throw a 2 yard screen pass to my running back, come at me bro.

by Kblomfiee on Oct 18, 2011 10:03 AM CDT reply actions  

Who knows what the 2nd 1 is worth

…maybe it is a Superbowl birth?

Stupid Raiders, going and trading their picks to make a Superbowl team. Grumblegrumblegrumble

by craig in calgary on Oct 18, 2011 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yep, Palmer is definitely the guy to trade your future on.

I mean look at his track record. Brady 2.0.

What's the difference between jelly and jam?

by WestonK on Oct 18, 2011 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

I didn't say that it WILL happen

I just don’t know what the trigger is for the second 1st rounder

by craig in calgary on Oct 18, 2011 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Bet it's how much he plays

And maybe getting to the playoffs

by KCinIL on Oct 18, 2011 10:16 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

You really think theyre SB contenders?

They’re not winning it this year, I think we can all agree. After this year they have no money or draft picks to better their team. Terrible move. Drew Bledsoe 2.0. I couldn’t love this move any more, for us :)

by KCinIL on Oct 18, 2011 10:12 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Heck I don't think Palmer will have to play top-tier football himself for the Raiders to win the AFC West.

Just take care of the football and hand it off to one of their RBs and they will be in good shape.

*When we blitz, have the LB's do a KC Strip. Do this in remembrance of DT.
*Dear David Glass, as a lifelong Royals fan, I beg you to please sell the team. You have always been the problem; you will never be the solution.

by mistamic on Oct 18, 2011 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Nobody has mentioned

what a freakin genius Brown in Cincy is. Didn’t back down to player demands and then potentially gets 2 first round picks for a guy who is on a downward path in his career. Brilliant!

2010 = The beginning of a dynasty

by ChiefWildcat on Oct 18, 2011 10:08 AM CDT reply actions  

Guy is a horrible owner.

He got so effing lucky. Only a ginger and the Faider’s Organization could have saved his sorry ass.

by The_Bernard_Pollard_Rule on Oct 18, 2011 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

This doesn’t change anything. He’s an idiot who got lucky.

"Hater" is a term used by weak-minded people in the face of legitimate criticism.

by JComp11 on Oct 18, 2011 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Oh I know

the guy is an idiot. That’s what makes this so funny. If Brown is an idiot, what does that make the Raider’s? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

2010 = The beginning of a dynasty

by ChiefWildcat on Oct 18, 2011 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

For the Raiders...good player, bad trade

Maybe Palmer can help in Pryor’s development

Standing on the corner in a white Godfather hat. He drives a long black gangster Cadillac. He can steal a broads mind, man, in three or four minutes. It’s not how long you talk, brother, it’s what you put in it.

by HIV 2 Elway on Oct 18, 2011 10:09 AM CDT reply actions  

Those “conditions” for that 2nd conditional pick better be pretty hefty.

"Hater" is a term used by weak-minded people in the face of legitimate criticism.

by JComp11 on Oct 18, 2011 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

"good player, bad trade"

Exactly.

Can we get off this "Suck4Luck" bullshit? Actually WANTING us to lose? Seriously...WTF???

by Scott B. on Oct 18, 2011 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

Honestly the best the raiders could hopefore

They have already won to many games to be in the “Luck” sweepstakes, And really, of all the QB’s out there, that is the one that might be able to step in and get it done.

The other trades that have left them nearly draftless for the next couple of years is the real problem

by Bigcherokeechief on Oct 18, 2011 10:55 AM CDT reply actions  

So

What are they gonna do when he breaks his collarbone, trade away their 2014 and 2015 1st round picks for mcnabb?
Yes please!

#58 will always be king!

by gochiefsgo on Oct 18, 2011 12:37 PM CDT reply actions  

and you cant blame this one on Al Davis

That was not a joke btw. I think this goes to show that Al Davis wasn’t necessarily the one leading every dumbass move. Who in there right mind would trade 2 1st round picks for a washed up avg at best QB especially when he’s like 33 yrs old????

by JC25FoMVP on Oct 18, 2011 1:44 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

and you cant blame this one on Al Davis

That was not a joke btw. I think this goes to show that Al Davis wasn’t necessarily the one leading every dumbass move. Who in there right mind would trade 2 1st round picks for a washed up avg at best QB especially when he’s like 33 yrs old????

by JC25FoMVP on Oct 18, 2011 1:44 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog! Follow us on Facebook and on Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Chiefs OTA's: Some Real Football News
Dscn3246_3_small
Worst Case Scenario
Lips-rhps_small
Translating Coachspeak (Humor & Satire)

Recent FanPosts

Supernova1007_small
What Does it Take?
Ford-mustang-gt-2011-wallpaper-02_small
Hope
New_kc_helm_small
Scott Pioli: Genuine Mastermind Part 1 - Quarterbacks
Dirtyhippy_small
The Epic Battle of Pittsburgh(Game 9 preview)
Spit_small
A Unique Look At Elite QB's and Ricky Stanzi
309look_small
Cassel, can the chiefs get a ring on his back?
Small
Trade McCluster...
Supernova1007_small
A New 3-4 team in the NFL
Supernova1007_small
Fashionistas

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Ct_fb_small Chris Thorman

Headshot_small Joel Thorman

Editors

288-chiefstexans0944_sp_8-15-09_jfs woodman212

Matt_ssv_pic_small_small Matt Conner

Stag_20silhouette_small stagdsp

Lips-rhps_small upamtn

Contributors

Kc_ny_small NJ Chiefs Fan

Phoenix_by_melen_small KaloPhoenix

N1358340181_30185582_5800_small Flowers24

Small Jon Yoon

Dirkness_small HisDirkness

Dscn3246_3_small MNchiefsfan

Cassel_small Steve_in_RI