Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ryder Hesjedal Wins Giro d'Italia

Aaron Curry To The Raiders

Photo

Remember a few years ago when we were all arguing who the Kansas City Chiefs should select in the 2009 NFL draft? A popular guy for KC fans (including myself) to talk about was LB Aaron Curry, who ultimately went fourth in the draft, one spot behind the Chiefs, who selected DE Tyson Jackson.

Today, Curry has been traded, and he's coming to the AFC West.

Jay Glazer of FOXSports.com reports that the Seahawks have traded Curry to the Oakland Raiders for two draft picks -- one in 2012 and another in 2013. The Raiders don't have a second, third or fourth round pick in the 2012 NFL draft. 

UPDATE 4:37 p.m. ET:  Chris Mortensen of ESPN reports that the Seahawks will get a seventh-rounder from the Raiders in 2012, and a conditional mid-round pick in 2013. 

Comment 136 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Huh. Guess they're trying to speed up that defense

I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.

by MNchiefsfan on Oct 12, 2011 3:47 PM CDT reply actions  

Problem there is again Philly

spending all that on a Man to Man cover corner, and putting him in zone %95+ of the time

by GracieKal on Oct 12, 2011 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

its also not a type of zone scheme that fits him

Team Pioli/Haley. Decade of the Chiefs.
Team Colquitt

by SDChief on Oct 12, 2011 3:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

Its also a horrible defense in general

Juan Castillo is just bad.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Oct 12, 2011 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Awseome pass rush ,sorry linebackers,overrated in the secondary

Maybe they suck because they didn’t add a lb in free agency

Just tell it to call you Billie!

by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Oct 12, 2011 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Probably

Reid just avoids LBs like they’re the plague for some reason.

Their Safeties are pretty horrible too.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Oct 12, 2011 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

He was their defensive captain after Dawkins left

but the torn ACL a few years ago and concussions made him “a risk” to keep I guess. I honestly don’t know how he’s doing in Arizona.

Your eyes tell you more than any statistics can.

by kc_radrh8r on Oct 12, 2011 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

not much

14 tackles (9 solo)1 pass def. 11th on the team

Just tell it to call you Billie!

by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Oct 12, 2011 5:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

I caught some of their game vs the Vikings

I’m surprised they have 14 tackles as a team!

Your eyes tell you more than any statistics can.

by kc_radrh8r on Oct 12, 2011 5:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think he'll do good

I don’t think he’s played bad in Seattle, just hasn’t lived up to the potential/hype.

But also SEA has been asking him to do stuff that is outside of his skill set.

Watching the KC vs IND game right now and just had the thought, Chiefs should’ve gotten him and put him where Sabby plays, and where McGraw played when we had Berry… UPGRADE

by GracieKal on Oct 12, 2011 3:52 PM CDT reply actions  

Whaaa?

Curry fits best as a 4-3 OLB, and he’s just bad in coverage. They regularly tried him at covering tight ends and he failed miserably.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Oct 12, 2011 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

I remember last year

he kept on yelling and you could hear him over everything. Even when they were down a million points in the game against the Chiefs. He kept on celebrationg over every little thing. He was in the area of a tackle he would yell. Annoying.

by Chiefsfan85 on Oct 12, 2011 3:54 PM CDT reply actions  

Yea I still remember him tackling Charles after a 7+ yard run

And the guy stood up howling like he just made a tackle for a ten yard loss.

Check out my blog on software development:
http://www.turnleafdesign.com/

by Scaryclouds on Oct 12, 2011 4:38 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

He also completely whiffed on a tackle after Thomas Jones received a short pass over the middle.

Any good LB would have destroyed Jones there in that vulnerable position.

Aaron Curry is the first Seahawk since Walter Jones to have a legitimate shot at Hall of Fame induction - John Morgan

by Fearless Frog on Oct 12, 2011 4:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

He celebrated routine tackles (even ones after the first down was achieved) like he made a goal-line stop at the Super Bowl.

Aaron Curry is the first Seahawk since Walter Jones to have a legitimate shot at Hall of Fame induction - John Morgan

by Fearless Frog on Oct 12, 2011 4:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

I look at it this way

Curry is a liability in coverage and against the run, but is solid at getting to the passer. Kamerion Wimbley anybody?

BOOM!

by 808NaNz808 on Oct 12, 2011 3:54 PM CDT reply actions  

Seahawk fans say he's great against the run, particularly when it comes to setting the edge

This has been a decided weakness for the Raiders with Quentin Groves back there at OLB.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Oct 12, 2011 4:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

No he's a liability at getting to the passer too.

Aaron Curry is the first Seahawk since Walter Jones to have a legitimate shot at Hall of Fame induction - John Morgan

by Fearless Frog on Oct 12, 2011 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I've heard that he's been thoroughly disappointing.

Do you think it’s a skill set thing? A work ethic thing? General lack of effort? Misuse in a scheme?

We Don't Hear The Hate

by TRSChief on Oct 12, 2011 4:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

A combination of many things

New regime change and Curry being dumb as a box of rocks are a couple.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Oct 12, 2011 4:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Skill set.

Apparently he has a fine work ethic (although I have seen him take snaps off in games), but he’s just a terrible pass rusher. He wasn’t a good one in college either (only 9 sacks in 4 years starting), which made him a pretty awful choice for a top 5 pick.

Aaron Curry is the first Seahawk since Walter Jones to have a legitimate shot at Hall of Fame induction - John Morgan

by Fearless Frog on Oct 12, 2011 4:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

He's not a liability getting to the passer

Where he’s a liability is shedding blocks, just dreadful.

He’d be a horrible fit for the Chiefs I’m glad we didn’t go after him.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Oct 12, 2011 4:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

No, trust me, he's a liability at getting to the passer.

 I’ve watched every snap he’s played. His idea of pass rush is is trying to go right around or bull rush a tackle, and he fails at both. One time he had a clear shot at Jay Cutler untouched last year and completely whiffed on the sack.

Aaron Curry is the first Seahawk since Walter Jones to have a legitimate shot at Hall of Fame induction - John Morgan

by Fearless Frog on Oct 12, 2011 4:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Like I said, he can't shed blocks to save his life

But he is relentless as a pass rusher.

Sure he’s only got a couple moves at this point, but he’s shown improvement every year.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Oct 12, 2011 4:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

No he hasn't.

He had 3.5 sacks last year, against the likes of Derek Anderson, Alex Smith, and Jay Cutler. In all cases he was either untouched our the QB took a bad sack.

Aaron Curry is the first Seahawk since Walter Jones to have a legitimate shot at Hall of Fame induction - John Morgan

by Fearless Frog on Oct 12, 2011 5:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Did you see Justin Houston this last weekend

Didn’t see him shed any blocks, but he was still a relentless pass rusher that disrupted Painters painting of our defense.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Oct 13, 2011 9:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

Did I say Curry was Houston in any shape or form?

Just because I used one game by Houston as an example in a comparison doesn’t mean Curry=Houston.

Against the Colts, Houston wasn’t getting off blockers. But he was relentless time and time again pressuring the QB through his blocker. This is what I mean, just because you can’t get off blocks doesn’t mean you lack pass rush. They’re mutually exclusive of each other.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Oct 13, 2011 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sounds like

Kawika Mitchell

Your eyes tell you more than any statistics can.

by kc_radrh8r on Oct 12, 2011 5:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

ok. Jackson officially outlasts curry on his first team

and jackson is actually playing well now….go figure

Team Pioli/Haley. Decade of the Chiefs.
Team Colquitt

by SDChief on Oct 12, 2011 3:58 PM CDT reply actions  

Played well last year too

Do we go fetal and beg for mercy? Or do we pick up that broken piece of pipe laying on the ground and come up swinging? I choose pipe.
Sober (again) since January 10th, 2011.

by nateforchiefs on Oct 12, 2011 6:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

The problem is you have to pay his contract too.

I imagine it is a pretty big number considering where he was drafted.

The views expressed by craig in calgary do not necessarily represent the views of all Canadians.

by saskwatch on Oct 12, 2011 6:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes, Curry's contract was definitely an obscene albatross. He was being paid more than most QBs.

Aaron Curry is the first Seahawk since Walter Jones to have a legitimate shot at Hall of Fame induction - John Morgan

by Fearless Frog on Oct 12, 2011 8:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

If the raiders gave up their 1st round pick next year for him I am going to lmfao.

by CWil03 on Oct 12, 2011 4:03 PM CDT reply actions  

Nah just a 7th and a conditional in 2013

And he might not even re-sign with the Raiders, a steal if he pans out in anyway.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Oct 12, 2011 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Do they even have a 1st round pick next year

Didn’t they trade away their 1st for the next 5 years for Seymour or something?

by Ochophosphate on Oct 12, 2011 4:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

But they

are going to get 3 draft picks for losing Gallery, Nnamdi, and Miller

by AZDiamond75 on Oct 12, 2011 4:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Meh not much

They didn’t sign big contracts, and aren’t playing at a level that will take them to the Pro Bowl or make them All-Pros.

T

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Oct 12, 2011 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

I bet they get

a third, fourth, and a fifth….they are all starters.

by AZDiamond75 on Oct 12, 2011 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

That doesn't matter

Comp picks are based off of contracts and post-season accolades.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Oct 12, 2011 4:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Right

Like I said they will get a 3rd, 4th, and a 5th.

by AZDiamond75 on Oct 12, 2011 4:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why?

Cheap Contracts and from their play currently a lack of post-season accolades doesn’t bode to well for them getting those picks.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Oct 13, 2011 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Besides

They don’t need much…they have a good front 7, and a nice explosive offense…they can use their picks on basically depth…and their first rounder on a DB or LB.

by AZDiamond75 on Oct 12, 2011 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Their LBs aren't that good

Curry will help, but they’re below average at this point.

They still need help at WR, and the OL/QB could use an upgrade. Corner definitely needs an upgrade as does Safety.

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Oct 12, 2011 4:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

They have

good young WRs and a good young OL…I thik they’ll target DBs and ILBs. People on here are saying they don’t have any picks….they’ll have 6. They haven’t lost a game in the AFC West in over a year…I hate them, but they are fast and physical.

by AZDiamond75 on Oct 12, 2011 5:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

yes

chiefs should get some to for losing Smith and Edwards

Just tell it to call you Billie!

by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Oct 12, 2011 4:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

No

We signed McClain, Siler, Gregg, and Breaston. We gained more then we lost, so no we won’t.

by AZDiamond75 on Oct 12, 2011 5:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

chiefs got one last year(Powe)

 And they added a lot more than they lost in 2010

Just tell it to call you Billie!

by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Oct 12, 2011 5:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's a formula that

 only the NFL knows…basically it comes down to if you gained more then you lost then you get none…I would say signing Breaston, Gregg, and McClain is more then Edwards and Smith.

by AZDiamond75 on Oct 12, 2011 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Here is what I know

In 2010 we added Jones.Lilja,Wiegman,Shaun Smith,andJerhme Urban.The only players we lost were Jason Babin(wish we had him back) and Wade Smith and remember ,Babin wasn’t a starter for us.He was a late season addition. We got 3 starters 1 psudo starter for 2 backups when they were here in 2009.If we use that model then we should get at least1 pick.We also lost Kevin Curtis who is on IR with the Titans and Vrabel retired .I think that factors in,we also lost,Brodie Croyle,Rudy Neiswenger and Maurice Leggette ,although none made a final roster

And ultimately , that is what confuses me.Do they factor in players signed away,but didn’t make a final roster?That i’m not sure about but,I would think not.

Just tell it to call you Billie!

by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Oct 12, 2011 5:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ok this is strange

The only FA NFL.com has us losing is Wade Smith, and it has us signing none…so I guess it matters if they were offered contracts or not. Here is an explanation from NFL.com

Compensatory free agents are determined by a formula based on salary, playing time and postseason honors. The formula was developed by the NFL Management Council. Not every free agent lost or signed by a club is covered by this formula.

by AZDiamond75 on Oct 12, 2011 6:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

So you're right lol

Sounds like it’s determined in a secret meeting by a chosen clandestine council . How ever many smoke puffs rise up to the sky is how many picks we get.That is weird

Just tell it to call you Billie!

by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Oct 12, 2011 6:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ha ha....Yeah

I’ve read from other reporters that nobody knows the exact formula. I guess the only FAs that count are only UFAs that are offered contracts by their teams…or in Nnamdi’s case, voided his contract.

by AZDiamond75 on Oct 12, 2011 6:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

We found the formula.

Offer your UFA’s you don’t want a insulting low ball money figure.And then if they sign with another team you get a draft pick.

Just tell it to call you Billie!

by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Oct 12, 2011 6:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, it's a bizarre way of doing things.

Just when I think I’ve got a grasp on how it works, a pick is / isn’t awarded that goes completely in the face of what I thought – then it’s back to the drawing board.

We Don't Hear The Hate

by TRSChief on Oct 13, 2011 9:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well we signed

Jones, Urban and Smith. Can’t remember who we lost

by AZDiamond75 on Oct 12, 2011 5:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Chiefs fans should be ecstatic.

Curry is the most easily exploitable liability I have ever seen. He bites on every playfake imaginable, plus has putrid coverage “skills”.

Aaron Curry is the first Seahawk since Walter Jones to have a legitimate shot at Hall of Fame induction - John Morgan

by Fearless Frog on Oct 12, 2011 4:23 PM CDT reply actions  

well It will be nice to see the radiers

not have any draft picks.. the poster child of building a team through Free Agents

by Bigcherokeechief on Oct 12, 2011 4:28 PM CDT reply actions  

Cassel’s on NFL network right now, if anyone’s interested.

"Hater" is a term used by weak-minded people in the face of legitimate criticism.

by JComp11 on Oct 12, 2011 4:45 PM CDT reply actions  

GOOD dude

In my opinion toughest QB in the league.Wish he had a stronger arm and saw the field better.

Just tell it to call you Billie!

by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Oct 12, 2011 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'd settle for him just having better pocket awareness and sliding around in the pocket as it shifts

If he could lock that down, he’d be a lot more consistent I think. The rest would just be gravy.

We Don't Hear The Hate

by TRSChief on Oct 13, 2011 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Na thats how he celebrates actually getting on the field now

I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Alameda Ta’amu NT/DE 2012 Draftee

by BAMFSpecialOps on Oct 12, 2011 5:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

BOYSSSSSSSSSSS IM HEREEEEEEEEEEEE

oh.. wait the play is over?

oh.. wait the play is over?DAMMMMMMMMMMMM back to the bench..

I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Alameda Ta’amu NT/DE 2012 Draftee

by BAMFSpecialOps on Oct 12, 2011 5:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Doesn't say much for Curry's upside.

Trading a number one pick for a ham sandwich and an RC? Wow. Seattle saw no potential there.

by BinSC on Oct 12, 2011 4:55 PM CDT reply actions  

Pete Carrol

also shipped off Lawrence Jackson for close to nothing. I’d guess this is more a testament to Pete wanting to clear out anyone he doesnt want more so than Curry only being worth a 7th rounder…not that I’m saying he’d be much higher though.

Your eyes tell you more than any statistics can.

by kc_radrh8r on Oct 12, 2011 5:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

So Pete is really just Herm Edwards in a costume?

I guess Merm took off the Josh McDanials mask and put on a Pete Carol mask. It’s all so clear now. I feel so sorry for the Seahawk fans. Which franchise will Herm attack next?

RUN DEXTER RUN!!!!

by ARROWHEADSHANE on Oct 12, 2011 5:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lawrence Jackson was terrible.

It isn’t hard to look marginally better than awful with a D-Line as strong as Detroit’s.

Aaron Curry is the first Seahawk since Walter Jones to have a legitimate shot at Hall of Fame induction - John Morgan

by Fearless Frog on Oct 12, 2011 5:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Seattle has no clue either though.

Pete Carol can be a rah rah guy all he wants, but when it comes right down to it, he doesn’t have what it takes to be an NFL Head Coach. This is just history repeating itself.
Overpay for Charlie Whiteherst, oops….Overpay for T. Jackson, ooops… trade away a potential star LB, ooooooops.
It’s a matter of time before he’s back in the college ranks again. What a Yutz.

RUN DEXTER RUN!!!!

by ARROWHEADSHANE on Oct 12, 2011 5:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Potential star LB?

Curry was a ruinous liability on our defense every time he was on the field.

Aaron Curry is the first Seahawk since Walter Jones to have a legitimate shot at Hall of Fame induction - John Morgan

by Fearless Frog on Oct 12, 2011 5:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

I see frog isn't number one on the Aaron Curry fan club.

The views expressed by craig in calgary do not necessarily represent the views of all Canadians.

by saskwatch on Oct 12, 2011 6:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

He's probably the only Seahawk fan in this thread so I give his opinion more credit than most here

Do we go fetal and beg for mercy? Or do we pick up that broken piece of pipe laying on the ground and come up swinging? I choose pipe.
Sober (again) since January 10th, 2011.

by nateforchiefs on Oct 12, 2011 6:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

I feel like a lot of players need good coaching...

especially in the early part of their career or it ruins them. Early in their career is a big time for development. You get to a point where you can’t teach an old dog new tricks. I feel like Curry hasn’t really had good coaches in Seattle while he has been there. Fortunately for Curry, he is still young enough to develop.

Live Adventure!

by MountainManMike on Oct 12, 2011 11:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's false.

Curry’s had great coaching, and its reflected in the fact that all of Seattle’s other LBs are all well-coached and quality players.

Curry himself is to blame for being total garbage.

Aaron Curry is the first Seahawk since Walter Jones to have a legitimate shot at Hall of Fame induction - John Morgan

by Fearless Frog on Oct 13, 2011 1:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'd have done this

they stole him. The main thing i want in a jack ILB is speed and block shed ability.

by SillyHatDay on Oct 12, 2011 5:05 PM CDT reply actions  

We will get him next year in the draft

his name is Burfict out of ASU…check him out…nasty…brings the lumber like Ray Ray

by AZDiamond75 on Oct 12, 2011 5:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Phillip Rivers, Knowshon Moreno, Tim Tebow and Darren McFadden would say "fuck this" and retire.

They’d come to the conclusion that they like walking, breathing and eating without the assistance of a feeding tube.

by Tomahawk29 on Oct 12, 2011 5:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

And...nvm

Nicknames I have coined:

Jamaal Charles = 'Haley's Comet'
Shaun Smith = 'Big Nasty'
Kelly Gregg = 'Old Gregg'

by Nick Britt on Oct 12, 2011 5:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well Curry has zero block shed ability

So yeah…

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Oct 13, 2011 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

OVER RATED

  That is all that needs to be said about Curry, he couldnt even shine on a bad team consistently.

    I hope KC fans learn a valuable lesson here, do not place all your hopes on a prospect out of college.

   Oakland might light a fire underneath Curry they have a better DL in my opinion. That always helps a LB.

by Sinny on Oct 12, 2011 5:49 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

He is still worth a look for a 7th round pick.

Aaron Curry for Shane Bannon ,I’ll take that any day of the week.

Just tell it to call you Billie!

by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Oct 12, 2011 6:22 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Crazy

The Raiders now have my two favorite LB’ers to come out in the last few years. Rolando McClain and Aaron Curry. Someone in the Raiders front office has the same taste in talent that I do…..crap!

How long should you try? Until.
- Jim Rohn

by Matt_Grbac on Oct 12, 2011 7:10 PM CDT reply actions  

I'm not sure if that is a compliment to them

or an insult to yourself..

J/k of course

I don't start arguments, I provoke thinking. -Me
Alameda Ta’amu NT/DE 2012 Draftee

by BAMFSpecialOps on Oct 12, 2011 9:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Raiders are building a team to win now!

 I keep hearing how the Raiders sign players for to much money. They better enjoy it before their window closes. Were still trying to rebuild after our window closed when Vermeil was the Coach.

by rdlvegas85 on Oct 12, 2011 10:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

People - please stop saying "He's worth a 7th rounder, wish we got him."

PLEASE READ THE ARTICLE AGAIN – THEY GOT TWO PICKS FOR HIM. A 7th next year AND a MID ROUND conditional in 2013.

Sorry for yelling, just frustrating. They paid more than you guys keep saying. And sounds like he’s not worth it at all. Quite a shame for one of the most hyped players by many folks on here for our NO. 1 2009 pick. Whew, that was close. Thank the gods.

CHIEFS DYNASTY – we’re kind of a big deal

by kabrink on Oct 12, 2011 9:50 PM CDT reply actions  

ok a 7th and mayde at most a 5th for the 4th over all pick

He was traded for a reason,I get it and I was never a big fan of his. But that isn’t that much to give up and he was a high pick for a reason.Most 5th -7th rounders don’t make the team,also it’s 1 this draft and 1 in next years draft.If it becomes a 5th then that means he performed well.Maybe Romeo could have gotten something out of him.After all,he made Tyson Jackson look decent. So,why couldn’t he do it for a guy playing out of position?

Just tell it to call you Billie!

by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Oct 12, 2011 10:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

by my definition

I would call a mid round conditional pick to be a 3, 4, or 5 depending on his performance. I think you’re way off base of “mid round” by saying “at most a 5th”. Not to mention a huge contract as others have said. I’m just saying the guy is not coming “practically free” as some people seem to be characterizing this trade.

Maybe the guy DOES pan out, I have no idea. But, it sure doesn’t look good. And, I hope he does NOT pan out because it’s the Raiders.

CHIEFS DYNASTY – we’re kind of a big deal

by kabrink on Oct 12, 2011 11:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

ESPN reports at most a 4th round pick in 2013.

Like I said ,if it goes up to a 4th it means he has performed making it a good trade.As far as his contract goes, he’s in his 3rd year of a 5 year deal.Don’t quote me on this ,but I imagine it was front loaded(most are so players won’t ‘’mail it in’’ at the end) so it probably isn’t as much as you think.In fact , I would bet he made most of his guaranteed money.And besides,when a player gets traded (i.e Matt Cassel) a restructured contract is usually hammered out and Curry at this point doesn’t have much leverage.

Just tell it to call you Billie!

by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Oct 12, 2011 11:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

AP sez

a conditional 5th in 2013.

by Kane on Oct 13, 2011 6:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well, Cassel had the franchise tag at the time he was traded

So his contract situation was a completely different animal than with Curry.

But a restructure would almost have to be mandatory I’d think with Curry. You just can’t soak up his contract for what he’s going to (not) produce.

We Don't Hear The Hate

by TRSChief on Oct 13, 2011 9:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

Seatle already restructured his deal

Just read the article again so,Oakland is off the hook for a lot of money.

Just tell it to call you Billie!

by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Oct 13, 2011 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Trade deadline is Tuesday

Maybe we can get a Santonio Holmes for a 5th rounder type deal.

Just tell it to call you Billie!

by saints_chiefsfan1979 on Oct 13, 2011 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah but Curry's contract supposedly ends this year

And if they don’t re-sign him I don’t think they have to give up that 2013 pick

Me and Matt Cassel just - you up, dog!

by ChiefWarPaint on Oct 13, 2011 9:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

I understand he hasn't played well but my first reaction when I saw what they gave up was...

THATS IT???

He could end up doing nothing but it seems like a really good gamble by the raiders.

by Lucasjr5 on Oct 13, 2011 1:05 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog! Follow us on Facebook and on Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Chiefs OTA's: Some Real Football News
Dscn3246_3_small
Worst Case Scenario
Lips-rhps_small
Translating Coachspeak (Humor & Satire)

Recent FanPosts

Supernova1007_small
What Does it Take?
Ford-mustang-gt-2011-wallpaper-02_small
Hope
New_kc_helm_small
Scott Pioli: Genuine Mastermind Part 1 - Quarterbacks
Dirtyhippy_small
The Epic Battle of Pittsburgh(Game 9 preview)
Spit_small
A Unique Look At Elite QB's and Ricky Stanzi
309look_small
Cassel, can the chiefs get a ring on his back?
Small
Trade McCluster...
Supernova1007_small
A New 3-4 team in the NFL
Supernova1007_small
Fashionistas

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Ct_fb_small Chris Thorman

Headshot_small Joel Thorman

Editors

288-chiefstexans0944_sp_8-15-09_jfs woodman212

Matt_ssv_pic_small_small Matt Conner

Stag_20silhouette_small stagdsp

Lips-rhps_small upamtn

Contributors

Kc_ny_small NJ Chiefs Fan

Phoenix_by_melen_small KaloPhoenix

N1358340181_30185582_5800_small Flowers24

Small Jon Yoon

Dirkness_small HisDirkness

Dscn3246_3_small MNchiefsfan

Cassel_small Steve_in_RI