Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: Coverage of the 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing'

Nose Tackle, Dexter McCluster and The Chiefs Future

Photo

It's the draft class that helped the team get over the top. It's one of the most impressive groups of rookies in the NFL this season. It's a sign that the Chiefs will only get better given the youth at various skill positions. And then there's that one second round choice.

Save for the selections of Eric Berry at the top of the draft and Jon Asamoah to beef up an aging offensive interior, most of the Chiefs draft probably came as a major surprise to those watching. The experts predicted Kansas City would address both lines with a possible left tackle to push Branden Albert and a nose tackle to complete the reinvention after earlier drafts brought ends like Glenn Dorsey and Tyson Jackson. Linebacker was also presumed to be addressed (and not in a Cameron Sheffield in the fifth sort of way).

Instead, the Chiefs went with athleticism across the board, surprising draft experts with both second round choices of RB/WR Dexter McCluster and cornerback Javier Arenas. Both instantly boosted the Chiefs athleticism on both sides of the ball and revamped the Chiefs return game in one quick round. Tight end Tony Moeaki became another surprising choice after Pioli moved up to grab him. The choices were instantly hailed by some -- like Rich Gosselin and Mike Mayock -- and the results of an AFC West division win proved Pioli was onto something that precious April weekend.

Star-divide

Personally, I'm still in love with the idea of McCluster's future with the team. His instincts and athleticism should eventually become what the Chiefs drafted him for, despite the pedestrian numbers in his first season (21 receptions, 209 receiving yards, 18 rushes for 71 yards). But I have to question whether it was the right pick at the time, especially after two recent games display the absolute need to control the middle of the interior line.

For those who saw the BCS national title game between Auburn and Oregon, the dominance of nose tackle Nick Fairley was truly something to behold and left little doubt that his name will be the first called for the Carolina Panthers at next April's draft. Oregon's high powered offense could never get moving because of Fairley's disruptive strength and penetration and served as a prime example of what a dominant interior lineman brings to the table.

The same can be said of the recent Chiefs-Ravens game, which we've broken down ad nauseum in here. However, it's worth noting once again the dominant play of Haloti Ngata and Kelly Gregg who consistently forced Matt Cassel to make throws and decisions under pressure. It's interior linemen like those who allow linebackers like Ed Reed and Terrell Suggs and a secondary with Ed Reed to take chances and make the game-changing plays.

The Chiefs knew this already heading into the 2010 draft. Ron Edwards had served as the answer before, and the Chiefs lone response was to sign future fullback Shaun Smith to bolster the position. When the Chiefs failed to grab someone in the draft to also provide relief in the middle, some wondered whether or not the draft would be a success. Ten wins later, and you have your answer.

Yet in the long term, I have to question whether that was the right move. The immediate results make any conjecture against the draft seem ridiculous, but given next season's slate of playoff-caliber opponents, the Chiefs are going to need an influx of talent, youth and depth along the defensive line -- specifically in the interior. With the time it usually takes defensive linemen to adjust and make good at the NFL level (those not named Suh), the Chiefs might have been better off drafting the future of the position last year.

The dazzle of a McCluster can sure tempt given the possibilities, but the physical nature of the teams left standing at this point serve as a reminder of the personnel it takes to win.

Comment 109 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'm not going to be one to question the McCluster pick

He can be a dynamic playmaker. My feeling is he was hampered by injury and by not having a defined role on the team. Everyone wanted a piece of his time. It’s a matter of do you want to be good at a lot of things, or great at a few? He has the athleticism and speed to be dominant in the NFL, he just lacks the savvy, I think that will come.
It’s also easy to second guess the pick, folks have been doing it for years. You could have taken Elway or Marino, you took Blackledge. I still think Scott and Todd went into the draft wanting to select for character and speed over positions of need. Face it, the 2009 Chiefs were slow as the 7 year itch and it was addressed in the draft. We can’t get where we want to be in one year, probably can’t in two, but I trust we will get there.

by Chief Willie Wildcat on Jan 15, 2011 9:07 AM CST reply actions  

As a team, we were slow like Christmas..

Speed was definitely a team need – still is in at least one or two positions (WR anyone?).

"We're making progress, that's the key thing." - Todd Haley

by chiefsfan62 on Jan 15, 2011 10:20 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Correction...

You could have taken Dan Marino, Jim Kelly or Tony Eason. You couldnt have taken Elway as he went 1st overall to the Colts and later traded to the Broncos who still picked higer than us.

Team Berry

by MasterBlaster7 on Jan 15, 2011 3:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Even though McCluster was slowed down...

due to the ankle injury and finished slow, I would say he made more of an overall impact for a rookie than any of the potential NT’s did for other teams.

Pioli was obviously looking for guys who could step-in right away and typically it takes 2-3 years for a lineman to start seeing any success. Dex was really starting to come on until the injury and I think an offseason of strength and conditioning is only going to make him better.

I look forward to seeing who we draft this year, as I’m sure Pioli has some thoughts on where he wants to upgrade that will probably surprise us.

by WesternChief on Jan 15, 2011 9:11 AM CST reply actions  

I don't think you can address every need in one offseason

also, good teams follow their draft board and don’t pick just to fill a need rather its best player available. I’m fine with the McCluster pick. You can’t teach speed. He’s a dynamic and versatile player that was slowed by an ankle injury. He was also just a rookie so let’s give him a chance.

by golfbard on Jan 15, 2011 9:13 AM CST reply actions  

Great post!

I have been thinking about our lack of pressure up the middle all year. How many times did a QB run up the middle after dropping back to pass or he saw the open dump off to the running back. We have outstanding pressure on the outside and I believe we would double our sack production if there was a constant force up the middle.

November 23, 2006. 1st and only trip to Arrowhead. That was a good day...

by florida chief on Jan 15, 2011 9:14 AM CST via mobile reply actions  

Double our sack production?

So we would have almost 80 SACKS on the season if we would just have a bit more pressure up the middle? Yikes! Would that be an all-time record for sacks in a season??? :-)

"That was a good job. It wasn't pretty and we made it tougher than it had to be but that's alright. That's alright this time." - Todd Haley
Win pretty, win ugly, win easy, win tough, it doesn't matter

by FalconMF27 on Jan 15, 2011 9:21 AM CST up reply actions  

ha, yeah

They basically doubled their sack production the last 2 years, but it’s not gonna double in 2011

2008 10, 2009 22, 2010 38

It’s an overlooked area of improvement, but I think they have been getting decent pressure on the QB as of late.

Of course, more would be better

It's all about the gameplan

by stagdsp on Jan 15, 2011 2:03 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

I have to question
The Chiefs knew this already heading into the 2010 draft. Ron Edwards had served as the answer before, and the Chiefs lone response was to sign future fullback Shaun Smith to bolster the position.

To say that Pioli/Haley “knew” anything about how they felt about Ron Edwards after one year in the 3-4 system and that signing Smith wouldn’t have any impact on the improvement of our d-line is a stretch. I would guess that in viewing the game film this year, we might not see any draft picks made to bolster the d-line again! Considering how well our run defense was, and the fact that it was made pretty clear that Pioli/Haley felt that if they could improve the secondary (Berry, Arenas, Lewis), that more sacks would come from our current roster, which they did. (Granted they were mostly from one player, but regardless…). Pressure up the middle might not have been as present as it might have been if we had drafted a NT in the 2nd, but again, considering the run defense this year, it’s hard to fault what the team did.

The middle of both of our lines, Center and NT/ILB does need some improvement from depth and competition, but to have made the decision to go that direction over what they did in 2010 would have been a mistake, IMO.

"That was a good job. It wasn't pretty and we made it tougher than it had to be but that's alright. That's alright this time." - Todd Haley
Win pretty, win ugly, win easy, win tough, it doesn't matter

by FalconMF27 on Jan 15, 2011 9:19 AM CST reply actions  

Pressure up the middle might not have been as present as it might have been might have been present if we had drafted a NT in the 2nd,

"That was a good job. It wasn't pretty and we made it tougher than it had to be but that's alright. That's alright this time." - Todd Haley
Win pretty, win ugly, win easy, win tough, it doesn't matter

by FalconMF27 on Jan 15, 2011 9:30 AM CST up reply actions  

Which 2nd round or later NT would've helped us this year?

Cam Thomas didn’t sniff the field in SD, Cody was rotational, however, I believe he was injured the first part of the year. I just don’t think any of this years later round rookies would’ve helped us all that much along the d-line.

by WesternChief on Jan 15, 2011 9:53 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

are you kidding?

Lamarr Houston should have been a Pro Bowler for Oakland just a few picks later.

by Matt Conner on Jan 15, 2011 11:10 AM CST up reply actions  

So a barely 300 lbs. DT was going to fill our NT position???

"That was a good job. It wasn't pretty and we made it tougher than it had to be but that's alright. That's alright this time." - Todd Haley
Win pretty, win ugly, win easy, win tough, it doesn't matter

by FalconMF27 on Jan 15, 2011 11:27 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

nope

It's all about the gameplan

by stagdsp on Jan 15, 2011 2:04 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

You do realize how poor our run defense was right?

The last 10 games of the season, the Chiefs run defense was ranked 31st in the league…it got increasingly worse.

by Larryemcdaniel on Jan 15, 2011 10:38 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

You do realize...

That two games, @SD and Oakland run that last 10 game average WAY up, correct? I won’t say it got “worse”, I’ll say that a couple-few games all season weren’t good. Overall, the ENTIRE season, the run defense was much improved, and the massive change at NT that the author of this post suggests should have been made instead of drafting McCluster just doesn’t add up.

"That was a good job. It wasn't pretty and we made it tougher than it had to be but that's alright. That's alright this time." - Todd Haley
Win pretty, win ugly, win easy, win tough, it doesn't matter

by FalconMF27 on Jan 15, 2011 10:56 AM CST up reply actions  

ummm i never said we wernt improved

But facts are facts. I dont care that "@SD and Oakland" ran the average way up. I guess when Denver ran for over 200 and 150 yards on us in both games, that didnt run it up. KC gave up three 200 yard rushing games in the final 5 games of the season, and gave up 0 200 yard games in the beginning of the season. Like I said…in the final 8 games (8 not 10) the Chiefs were the 31st ranked rush defense i the NFL…

Im not saying a NT in round 2 would of fixed that. Im just saying we need a new NT. Ron Edwards isnt the answer and our run defense is wildly inconsistent.

by Larryemcdaniel on Jan 15, 2011 11:15 AM CST up reply actions  

What we really need is that "killer" instinct....

that you see on all the DOMINANT defensive lines. Our current attitude is like putting on a Hello Kitty band-aid on a sucking chest wound. We need what we saw in DJ at the Colts in week 5. Insane play. Mauling lines. Blowing up backfields.

Out.

by Chiefs Fanatic on Jan 15, 2011 11:03 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

agreed

I want bigger, more physical, nastier players.

by Larryemcdaniel on Jan 15, 2011 11:21 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

McReach

I don’t comment on this site for the people that are against me and think that I can’t do it. I comment for the people that have always believed in me. I comment for my family, for my wife, for my mother so it really comes down to that.

by HIV 2 Elway on Jan 15, 2011 9:26 AM CST via mobile reply actions  

Considering it can be argued that McCluster won us a game, a VERY important game at that, here's to hoping he can do it again in the future

"That was a good job. It wasn't pretty and we made it tougher than it had to be but that's alright. That's alright this time." - Todd Haley
Win pretty, win ugly, win easy, win tough, it doesn't matter

by FalconMF27 on Jan 15, 2011 9:31 AM CST up reply actions  

What would you be writing if Bowe hadn't busted out?

We really had to have some play making ability on offense and it so happened the speedy Dex fit the bill. I think a NT is important to have, but other positions are just as important. In my opinion we need a RT as the primary need this coming season. Yes a NT and another wideout is something we have need for as well, but the RT spot is preeminent. If Roger Saffold was available last year we may not have seen Dexter on this team.

by dubld on Jan 15, 2011 9:40 AM CST reply actions  

I have to say a Center is more important than a RT, at this point

Only b/c our center position is in need of an heir apparent to Wiegmann, if he comes back at all! RT is at least decently filled by Richardson for the time being; while he needs to continue to develop his game and his maturity, but he’s under contract and isn’t a threat to retire. Center is the most significant need on the O-line

"That was a good job. It wasn't pretty and we made it tougher than it had to be but that's alright. That's alright this time." - Todd Haley
Win pretty, win ugly, win easy, win tough, it doesn't matter

by FalconMF27 on Jan 15, 2011 9:47 AM CST up reply actions  

rudy didn't even make the playoff active list. you really think they think very highly of him?

inactive at least part of the season and sign an old veteran who starts from day one……

I’d rather see this position addressed by a draft pick or another stop-gap center. and that stop-gap would/could be Brian Waters, if he is willing.

Albert, Asomoah, Waters, Lilja, Richardson

Not saying that’s what I want, but if Weigmann doesn’t come back, that’s better than Rudy.

Scott Pioli for President in 2012. Experience? If the current President doesn't need it, why does Pioli? Besides, Pioli has the blue collar work ethic with a white collar brain. He has humility. He is tough on security. He supports war on Sundays. And he makes sound, fiscally conservative decisions.

by chief Stevie_k on Jan 15, 2011 10:20 AM CST up reply actions  

I think that lineup is a year away

I think they will resign Wieg for another year. They might even take a late round flier on a C to see what he has. This would also give Asamoah another year to learn from two PB guards. You might see something like what happened in the 2010 draft. They had Asamoah way higher than where we selected him. If a Center falls to the 3rd round that they had as a 2nd round talent, he could very likely become a Chief.

by Raiderhater1 on Jan 15, 2011 10:47 AM CST up reply actions  

I could see that

However, I can’t see us taking a WR, OT, nor any LB at #21 either. I just think a top rated center who would be an early 2nd round pick anyway makes too much sense picking at #21. However, we are in prime placement to try to trade down, and if that possibility comes up and still get that center, bingo!

"That was a good job. It wasn't pretty and we made it tougher than it had to be but that's alright. That's alright this time." - Todd Haley
Win pretty, win ugly, win easy, win tough, it doesn't matter

by FalconMF27 on Jan 15, 2011 10:59 AM CST up reply actions  

I think the only Center

worthy of the 21st pick would be Pouncey. He is only going to be rated that high because of how his brother was this year as a Rook. I dont think he is as good as his brother though.
The rest of these guys would be lucky to get a 2nd round grade from a few teams.

by Raiderhater1 on Jan 15, 2011 11:04 AM CST up reply actions  

I like Wiesnewski alot

He fits in with mostly everything that Pioli/Haley preached last draft about character, leadership, etc. He’s the top rated zone-blocking center, very intelligent and athletic, and is getting a pretty high 2nd round grade.

"That was a good job. It wasn't pretty and we made it tougher than it had to be but that's alright. That's alright this time." - Todd Haley
Win pretty, win ugly, win easy, win tough, it doesn't matter

by FalconMF27 on Jan 15, 2011 11:09 AM CST up reply actions  

He

is pretty weak when compared to most centers. He really doesnt have a good push and would have a hard time vs most 3-4 NT or larger 4-3 DT. I would have J.D.Walton ranked higher than him this year. Walton fell to the 3rd last year.

by Raiderhater1 on Jan 15, 2011 11:19 AM CST up reply actions  

Dont get me wrong

I would love him sometime in the 3rd, even if we had to trade up to get a shot at him if he fell to the 75 pick range…

by Raiderhater1 on Jan 15, 2011 11:20 AM CST up reply actions  

Rudy is better now than any rookie we bring in for the center spot.

Our GM didn’t pay him a million plus so he could cut him this year. Rudy is OK, he just couldn’t keep the weight on all season.

by dubld on Jan 15, 2011 10:54 AM CST up reply actions  

Rudy couldn't beat out Wiegmann

I don’t expect them to have high expectations about Rudy taking over at Center just b/c the better player is retiring. Of course, maybe they just wanted Rudy to sit behind Wiegmann for a year before he’s handed the starting position, but since he WAS the starter in 2009, and took a back seat to Wiegmann in 2010, it’s hard to think that. And considering that Rudy is a free agent along with Wiegmann, hard to see both of them being resigned.

"That was a good job. It wasn't pretty and we made it tougher than it had to be but that's alright. That's alright this time." - Todd Haley
Win pretty, win ugly, win easy, win tough, it doesn't matter

by FalconMF27 on Jan 15, 2011 10:21 AM CST up reply actions  

In case Casey got hurt, I guess.

A million dollar insurance policy? Because Rudy didn’t get in a game all season, did he? If he was on the field at all…I missed it.

2010 was merely a glimpse of Chiefs to come...

by Scott B. on Jan 15, 2011 11:35 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree.

"If ifs mattered, everyone would be undefeated." Enite

by Enite on Jan 15, 2011 3:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Foundation

Seems they went for the fancy windows and roof shingles, before the foundation. Thats ok, it worked. This year the foundation ( O Line and D line ) will be poured.

by Masons on Jan 15, 2011 9:46 AM CST reply actions  

foundation is already there.

this analogy gets old (upamtn).

who says that the lines are the foundation? The foundation of a team is a solid roster.

I think we all assume that PIoli/Haley will have long-time, talented chiefs at every position for years to come. How do we know that Pioli will ever (somewhat) permanently address every position?
Maybe every year he’ll bring in journeymen centers and nose tackles and linebackers. Not saying he will, just saying he might. I think we all dream that he’ll have a couple more amazing drafts and then we’ll have 15 year, pro bowl caliber starters at every position and then we’ll just stock depth players and draft picks.

Scott Pioli for President in 2012. Experience? If the current President doesn't need it, why does Pioli? Besides, Pioli has the blue collar work ethic with a white collar brain. He has humility. He is tough on security. He supports war on Sundays. And he makes sound, fiscally conservative decisions.

by chief Stevie_k on Jan 15, 2011 10:29 AM CST up reply actions  

Everything works off the lines. IMO

To run you need a o line. To pass you need time ,O line. To stop the run you need a d line, to stop the pass you need a pass rush D line. Of course you need a supporting cast, but the team with the best combo of the two will win.

by Masons on Jan 15, 2011 12:58 PM CST up reply actions  

#1 rushing team. Cassel's sacks cut in half from 2009. 3,000 passing yards. hmmm....

KC’s defensive line was pretty adequate. about a step below KC’s offensive line.

Like I said, I think we mistakenly think Pioli is going to have 5 pro bowl caliber offensive lineman playing for KC for 15 years and 3 defensive linemen doing the same.

again, I’m not saying KC doesn’t need to make upgrades on the line, but the foundation is indeed there. but it can always be strengthened. at this point, it is just about temporary fixes when needed.

Scott Pioli for President in 2012. Experience? If the current President doesn't need it, why does Pioli? Besides, Pioli has the blue collar work ethic with a white collar brain. He has humility. He is tough on security. He supports war on Sundays. And he makes sound, fiscally conservative decisions.

by chief Stevie_k on Jan 15, 2011 7:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Where were those lines when we really needed them?

I’ll give you the improvement this year. But lets not get crazy. 3000 yards is nice but its not what it use to be. Charlie had Cassel get rid of ball quicker and Bowe decided to hold on to some balls. Lets not forget who the Chiefs played this year.
You are right it can always be strengthened and i believe this will happen in the draft.

by Masons on Jan 15, 2011 9:24 PM CST up reply actions  

3000 yards isn't what it used to be? It is on a running-based team! I think all of us would be thrilled

to even think about Cassel getting 3,000 yards this year.

Of course Charlie had Cassel get rid of the ball quicker. The guy actually had more sacks in NE. Thus, I’ve spent 2 years defending the offensive line. the numbers show that sacks have piled up wherever Cassel was. I’m not saying the offensive line was great when Cassel got here, but Cassel definitely didn’t help them out until this year. They took a lot of heat for a previous weakness in his game. And that weakness showed itself at times.

That said, at least half of 2010-11’s sacks came from blitzes. schematic issue rather than talent issue. Some were coverage sacks, as Bowe was blanketed and Cassel hasn’t quite developed the ability to progress thru his receivers. Some will say he doesn’t have time, but I’ll continue to argue against that.

Scott Pioli for President in 2012. Experience? If the current President doesn't need it, why does Pioli? Besides, Pioli has the blue collar work ethic with a white collar brain. He has humility. He is tough on security. He supports war on Sundays. And he makes sound, fiscally conservative decisions.

by chief Stevie_k on Jan 16, 2011 12:40 AM CST up reply actions  

Chicken or the egg

I guess, that is what it comes down to. Line not pass protecting / backs not picking up blitzes or receivers not getting open. Blame can go to a lot of places.
Maybe Cassel just isn’t that good under pressure.

by Masons on Jan 16, 2011 8:51 AM CST up reply actions  

I was fine with the McCluster pick

I have never had a problem with the McCluster pick. He will be a dynamic playmaker for this team, just needs to find a place in our offense. I’d like to see him used more in the wildcat, in which he was lethal for Ole’ Miss in college.

I always questioned the pick of Arenas, when there was a mammoth NT by the name of Terrence Cody still on the draft board. I will always compare those two players through out their careers. I personally think it would have been easier to find a nickel corner / return man later in the draft. I seem to recall a forced fumble by Cody in the playoffs, what did Arenas do in that game???

by chiefn25 on Jan 15, 2011 9:48 AM CST reply actions  

Wildcat is a thing of the past.

If KC goes and gets a legit number 2 WR, McCluster can consentrate on KR and Slot WR. I think that is what they intended to use him as then Chambers took a huge dump on the field. It kinda ruined the gameplan going into the season. Chambers really let Haley down, so he let him know that. Pioli will let him know that before the season by cutting him.

by Raiderhater1 on Jan 15, 2011 10:49 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree that I wanted Cody too, but

I trust Pioli when it comes to evaluation. NE (Pioli) is the best at knowing who can do what and for how long. They take guys you have never heard of and so called washed up players and make them pro bowlers. Then they know the perfect time to get rid of people. I believe that they noticed something about Cody that turned them off. They obviously just didn’t want him as they had 3 chances to get him.

"If ifs mattered, everyone would be undefeated." Enite

by Enite on Jan 15, 2011 3:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Look at History

Pioli history shows no inhibition about drafting interior DL high in the draft.

Could it be that he evaluated “The Big 3” that were available last year and decided with all the other teams switching to 3-4 that he would let them overpay for inferior talent? Some one here brighter than me can figure out if any of the NT"s drafted last year had any impact this year—I belive not.

The Chiefs could not plug all the holes last year, but did a very commendable job of buying some time and picking up FA’s like my favorite full back.. If our first 3 picks this year are C, NT, & WR—in no particular order, then that will be fine.

by SinceMG on Jan 15, 2011 9:49 AM CST reply actions  

Agreed

Dan Williams, Terrance Cody, Torrell Troup, Linval Joseph, Terrance Cody, not really blowing the hair back

"That was a good job. It wasn't pretty and we made it tougher than it had to be but that's alright. That's alright this time." - Todd Haley
Win pretty, win ugly, win easy, win tough, it doesn't matter

by FalconMF27 on Jan 15, 2011 9:55 AM CST up reply actions  

Troup

I really believe Troup was their target in round 2 and he just got taken right before they were picking at 50.

by Bsketbal52 on Jan 15, 2011 10:29 AM CST up reply actions  

i agree

He went much earlier than people predicted.

by Larryemcdaniel on Jan 15, 2011 10:45 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

yep

It’s obvious that Cody and Thomas weren’t even on the Chiefs draft board.

It's all about the gameplan

by stagdsp on Jan 15, 2011 2:06 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

We'll never know

The people who do aren’t talking and probably won’t, but I think the Chief’s probably thought it was safe to overdraft him at 2b or 3.

by Kane on Jan 15, 2011 11:18 AM CST up reply actions  

terrance cody twice....is that a fat joke?

Scott Pioli for President in 2012. Experience? If the current President doesn't need it, why does Pioli? Besides, Pioli has the blue collar work ethic with a white collar brain. He has humility. He is tough on security. He supports war on Sundays. And he makes sound, fiscally conservative decisions.

by chief Stevie_k on Jan 15, 2011 10:31 AM CST up reply actions  

LOL, accident, but a fat joke works too :-)

"That was a good job. It wasn't pretty and we made it tougher than it had to be but that's alright. That's alright this time." - Todd Haley
Win pretty, win ugly, win easy, win tough, it doesn't matter

by FalconMF27 on Jan 15, 2011 10:57 AM CST up reply actions  

Could you imagine

Cody showing up to camp at 380 lbs… Haley would have blown a frickin gasket!

by Raiderhater1 on Jan 15, 2011 10:58 AM CST up reply actions  

I thought maybe you were saying that he was twice the disappointment.

I can see how that could be misunderstood as a fat joke.

FA/Draft Wish List:
#2 WR
Pass Rushing OLB
Back-up or Developmental QB
True NT
Depth

by Falcon58 on Jan 15, 2011 11:33 AM CST up reply actions  

he didn't give up pursuit on charles

and almost killed him.

say what you want about cody, but I like him, and would still take him.

Scott Pioli for President in 2012. Experience? If the current President doesn't need it, why does Pioli? Besides, Pioli has the blue collar work ethic with a white collar brain. He has humility. He is tough on security. He supports war on Sundays. And he makes sound, fiscally conservative decisions.

by chief Stevie_k on Jan 15, 2011 7:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Agreed.

upgrading our team speed and leadership (all the picks that were College Captains) were major factors in us going from 4-12 to 10-6. We will need another great offseason to maintain this level of wins since our schedule got a lot more difficult.

by WesternChief on Jan 15, 2011 9:56 AM CST up reply actions  

Crennel

I would trust a guy who made his mark in the NFL as a DL coach. If he looked at all of those guys and didnt like them at the spot we were picking then I am fine with that. I cant believe for one second that Pioli wouldnt listen to him if Crennel thought one of them was a steal at their selection.

by Raiderhater1 on Jan 15, 2011 10:53 AM CST up reply actions  

I hope

we don’t have to take a DL that high. for 10 years the Chiefs have taken DL high and we have had little to show for it.

by Knocknheads on Jan 16, 2011 3:02 PM CST up reply actions  

of course, Pioli would have taken a NT

IF there was one that was a good fit, in the right place in the draft.

But, as much as we like to 2nd guess, there wasn’t a “gaping hole” at NT. Ron and Shaun held it down pretty well, overall.

Anyone who thinks McCluster wasn’t a need is kidding themselves. This team was terribly slow and the return game was aweful (remember Wade/Lawrence)

I like the Dex, I would have liked a NToTF, but I think we’ll get one this year.

It's all about the gameplan

by stagdsp on Jan 15, 2011 10:02 AM CST via mobile reply actions  

Between O'callaghan and Richardson,

I think they felt that the position was in decent shape.
As for WR, the majority of them had little effect this year. I point to golden tate as an example.

by Flower_Power on Jan 15, 2011 11:04 AM CST up reply actions  

They did

he was called Chambers… They didnt give him that contract and expect the type of year or effort he gave!

by Raiderhater1 on Jan 15, 2011 11:05 AM CST up reply actions  

Yup.

Chambers is on his way out. Mediocre season at best.

by Flower_Power on Jan 15, 2011 11:11 AM CST up reply actions  

I like McCluster, but agree he was probably not the right pick

Part time WR / part time RB / Part time KR or
Full time NT.
IMO I think full time NT would have been better.

by grid_iron on Jan 15, 2011 10:27 AM CST reply actions  

If Dex "lights it up" in Year #2...some of you will have some words to eat.

And I have a feeling he will. McCluster is a fairly unique type of player. Not really a RB…not exactly a WR. But, shows flashes of some magic when he has the ball in his hands.

I think they’re still trying to figure out exactly how to use the guy. Add to that, he was a Rookie after all. And had a pretty major injury that kept him out of 4-5 games…and possibly kept him from being 100% the rest of the way.

I predict that this time next year, Dex will be seen as a brilliant pick…not a “reach”, a “luxury”, or simply “wrong pick”.

Just my $.02.

Chiefs will.

10 + wins in 2010. Chiefs SHOCK the NFL!!! Mark it down.

by Scott B. on Jan 15, 2011 10:54 AM CST reply actions  

I like Dex

I was pulling for others to be drafted, and Dex was surely unexpected, but I’m fine with the pick. I trust pioli. I love that the team got fastet. It was painful watching old slow vets take the field for KC. I do hope we beef up the trenches and LB core now. I want us to become bigger and more physical, like the Patriots were.

by Larryemcdaniel on Jan 15, 2011 10:58 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Bigger and more physical

Might go against the zone-blocking regiment. I think someone said above that the thought that all zone-blocking linemen have to be under 300 lbs. might be outdated, but from last season of seeing the conditioning, weight problems the team went through and the push to get players to certain playing weights, it’s hard to dispute that lighter, faster, more athletic linemen is what Pioli/Haley are targeting. However, after getting dominated in the trenches against some key opponents, maybe that will change their thoughts.

"That was a good job. It wasn't pretty and we made it tougher than it had to be but that's alright. That's alright this time." - Todd Haley
Win pretty, win ugly, win easy, win tough, it doesn't matter

by FalconMF27 on Jan 15, 2011 11:02 AM CST up reply actions  

No no no

They pushed players who were out of condition and way over weight to drop weight. Albert was 340 and needed to be at 315 to have some agility. The zone scheme does not require smaller linemen. Bigger linemen does not go against the regiment. Its all about having flexible hips, knee bend-ability, being athletic enough to pull, having balance and being comfortable in space. It has nothing to do with weight/height measurements. We pursued Weigman and Lilja, not for their weight but because they were quality guys who would push our current starters down the depth chart. Haley made guys lose weight because the team was undisciplined, slow, and fat. A guy like Maurkice Pouncey is scheme versatile. If we had drafted him, he would of excelled in our zone scheme. He is a fantastic athlete, and sits at 6’4" 310lbs.

by Larryemcdaniel on Jan 15, 2011 11:20 AM CST up reply actions  

Athletic usually means lighter when discussing linemen

That’s just the way it is. I’m not disputing the thought of players that go against that norm, such as pounced possibly, but its rare enough that when talking about power blocking v. zone-blocking requiring lots of pulling, great footwork and agility to get to the 2nd level, that usually requires lighter weight. To call a player “scheme versatile” is pretty risky, especially with blocking schemes, unless u have seen the player in both schemes, which is rare for prospects in the draft

"That was a good job. It wasn't pretty and we made it tougher than it had to be but that's alright. That's alright this time." - Todd Haley
Win pretty, win ugly, win easy, win tough, it doesn't matter

by FalconMF27 on Jan 15, 2011 11:34 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Besides

Compare:
average weight for starting O-linemen:
KC – 306
Wash-304
Houston-305

Pitt – 329
Balt – 317
Oak – 316

Looking at 10+ lbs. per linemen comparing power blocking to zone blocking. Weight is definitely a factor

"That was a good job. It wasn't pretty and we made it tougher than it had to be but that's alright. That's alright this time." - Todd Haley
Win pretty, win ugly, win easy, win tough, it doesn't matter

by FalconMF27 on Jan 15, 2011 11:54 AM CST up reply actions  

Oakland I believe runs a zone blocking scheme.

R-E-S-T-E-C-P! Find out what ya mean to me.. R-E-S-C-E-T-P! ... 10-6 motha@$#%!! You know how'ta spell it!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hK6J_zw29RY (mild cursing. ahem.)

by ArrowSpread on Jan 15, 2011 4:07 PM CST up reply actions  

re-read

no one is saying that Dex won’t be good — or at least I wasn’t. I said above i believe he will turn out well in time, but i also believe that NT is as big of a need outside of QB as you can find. And we never properly addressed that need enough to stand up to larger opponents.

by Matt Conner on Jan 15, 2011 11:14 AM CST up reply actions  

True

It’s just that when you have needs at pretty much every position, like we did last year…it’s basically impossible to fill them all at once. Especially through the draft.

My hope is (if all remains the same on the CBA thing)…that a 10-6 Playoff team will be more attractive to FA’s than a 4-12 bottom feeder was. And that really good players will see KC as a team they would like to come play for.

Chiefs will.

10 + wins in 2010. Chiefs SHOCK the NFL!!! Mark it down.

by Scott B. on Jan 15, 2011 11:21 AM CST up reply actions  

totally agree...thats the problem with all the second guessing...we never made a luxory pick...

some same mccluster and arenas were…but no…not with the lack of team speed…

and others say fans dont see the team has holes because they made t he playoffs…this is also not true….fans just saw holes get FILLED for once rapidly…if we are able tofill as many holes as we did last year there are good odds that this team will be tough to beat next season

Team Pioli/Haley. Decade of the Chiefs.
Team Colquitt

by SDChief on Jan 15, 2011 1:00 PM CST up reply actions  

kid needs some Roids

he took hits like a champion this season, but that won’t last long. he needs some girth.

by Knocknheads on Jan 16, 2011 3:04 PM CST up reply actions  

McCluster as a #3, not a 2.5

Terrance Cody may have been a better pick in hindsight but I don’t think McCluster was a bad one.

We probably won’t see as much production out of McCluster as we would want until we fix the second receiver position. McCluster is a great in the slot for speed mis-matches, but if there is a quick linebacker on him for a short route or a safety on him for a deep one, he doesn’t have the size to compete for the ball in man-to-man coverage. The way the Ravens were able to take Bowe out of the game was with one CB and S help over the top. That leaves them plenty of d-backs and linebackers to cover both McCluster and Moeaki.

A #2 receiver forces the defense to play their safeties more honestly. They’ll have to do a lot more genuine cover-2’s and cover-3’s to protect the whole field instead of just rolling zone coverage/deep zones over the top of Bowe. That, in turn, makes more pass defense play further down the field, opening more holes in zones underneath and making whoever is covering McCluster play off a little to compensate for his speed or play up on him and potentially get burned. It also increases the probability that Cassel can formation shift into mis-matches for McCluster.

That #2 WR, in what I envision, could bolster McCluster’s efficacy if he were at least 6’0" or taller, had a decent vertical, and enough speed to occasionally burn a guy in man-to-man coverage. We basically need a dude who can make a defense pay for leaving him on an island so they have to be comprehensive with safety zone coverage. Obviously, this season Chambers couldn’t fill that role.

by hornetchiefsfan on Jan 15, 2011 11:03 AM CST reply actions  

There was an awful lot of questions about cody, though...

His weight was an issue, and character was also in there. I don’t particularly think he made Pioli’s list.

by Flower_Power on Jan 15, 2011 11:06 AM CST up reply actions  

True

I only say he could’ve been good cause he seems to be playing well. Quick feet, lots of strength and size….but he was also nicknamed “cheeseburger” in his first few days with the Ravens and took almost as long as Haynesworth to pass his conditioning test.

by hornetchiefsfan on Jan 15, 2011 11:13 AM CST up reply actions  

yeah. IMO cody was too big of a risk. I liked a few of the other options but thats ok.

I think we HAVE to find a NT somewhere somehow

maybe it ends up being S.Rogers

Team Pioli/Haley. Decade of the Chiefs.
Team Colquitt

by SDChief on Jan 15, 2011 1:03 PM CST up reply actions  

dex is fast

but he isnt quick. He really cant make people miss in the open field, hes had what seems like hundreds of chances to get past a guy but he either fumbles or gets ankle tackled. Sometimes he’ll have space down the field on a route, but drop the pass. Also he isnt strong. His weaknesses just strongly outweigh his strengths. In our offense I think Golden Tate would have been the more feasible pick at slot. The reason why im so dissapointed with Dex is…he was the most hyped rookie wideout during the offseason. But Dex Bryant, Mike Williams, and a bunch of other receivers made immediate game changing impact on their teams and besides one return, he did not make much of an impact. I hope he’ll have Desean Jackson esque offseason progression. We strongly need it or thats just another hole to fill.

Also getting a true #2 WR could open things up.

by JC25FoMVP on Jan 15, 2011 11:44 AM CST reply actions  

This is incorrect!

I would put McCluster’s quickness over his speed any day. Go watch his college highlights.

by bamachief5558 on Jan 15, 2011 1:46 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

agreed

He’s way quicker than he is fast.

It's all about the gameplan

by stagdsp on Jan 15, 2011 2:08 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Yes we've all seen his college highlights.

Now I could count the amount of people hes gotten past in the nfl with one hand. College doesnt matter

by JC25FoMVP on Jan 16, 2011 11:38 AM CST up reply actions  

Well there hasn't been a terribly large sample size for him in the pros, has there?

 And I was only recommending the highlights in case you hadn’t gotten much of a chance to watch what he does. I haven’t seen many of his NFL snaps because I live in Alabama and I had the opportunity to see only 4 games and an overtime this year (SD, Indy, Oakland OT, Titans, Oakland@Arrowhead).

However, I did watch him quite often in SEC matchups his last couple years at Ole Miss.

I’m just saying, that little dude’s quickness is his best attribute over his speed.

by bamachief5558 on Jan 16, 2011 6:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Wow.

"If ifs mattered, everyone would be undefeated." Enite

by Enite on Jan 15, 2011 3:43 PM CST up reply actions  

making people miss is not something players usually learn

DMC didn’t show the ability to begin with so it’s not looking good.

by Home skillet on Jan 15, 2011 12:46 PM CST reply actions  

not true, he showed the ability to make people miss...he just lost a little bit of speed with that injury

listen I still wanted a NT…I still WANT a NT….but…mccluster is pretty dynamic, I just hope hes not a one trick pony as I sort of noticed that he has one good “cut” move and then it gets repeated over and over

Team Pioli/Haley. Decade of the Chiefs.
Team Colquitt

by SDChief on Jan 15, 2011 12:56 PM CST up reply actions  

was a tough year for dex, and yes I wanted A NT more than anything for our D not named eric berry.

however..

if the blocking units can settle down….mccluster can still be a weapon

I still look at it this way…we won the afc west by 1 game over SD…we beat SD thanks to a punt return by mccluster. If he makes 1-2 of the plays per year at the right time….that right there is enough to justify the draft pick

I also believe teams wont be able to be prepared for the reverse etc w/ mccluster when we have a 2nd reciever opposite bowe.

Team Pioli/Haley. Decade of the Chiefs.
Team Colquitt

by SDChief on Jan 15, 2011 12:54 PM CST reply actions  

Not to mention

The fact that teams started to not even kick to him on the Kickoffs. If they start having the up guys pick up the squib kick, we start with the ball on the 35 or so… That is really good starting position.

by Raiderhater1 on Jan 15, 2011 12:56 PM CST up reply actions  

right. teams were scared even with poor return numbers. many fail to understand what it takes to put together a good return unit

its about the same as putting together a good D

it takes 2 years to gel

we really missed langford etc

Team Pioli/Haley. Decade of the Chiefs.
Team Colquitt

by SDChief on Jan 15, 2011 12:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Matt, nice write-up as always ... great comments throughout here by all

it’s always “easy” to look back an say “maybe if …” and wonder, but that’s not possible to go back and change … I wondered myself at the time, and have since (given the limited production we’ve seen from Dex, his limited use by Haley, et al) could we have done better adding to the line, O or D … at this point, looking back, I’d have to say yes

I’ve always felt that the game is won or lost in the trenches, along the line … and as you noted, Matt, the Ravens with Ngata (and other teams this past year) have proven that with ease … I’m a firm believer in finding and drafting young talent for the line, either side, both sides … we have Asamoah waiting in the wings, and perhaps one or two others (Darryl Harris, maybe?) but the fact is we need more … Smith was (I thought) originally signed to be “the answer” at NT but ended up playing DT as much or more than the center of the line, and that’s worrisome … we need that prototypical NT and more athletes at SOLB aand SILB who can cover as well as stuff the run

on offense we need the linemen for the future … C and RT very soon, and I’d imagine (at least hope) that those OLine and DLine needs are addressed in the upcoming FA and Draft … if not, things could be looking difficult, because while talent like Dex is nice, the team must find a way to utilize that talent, and a QB who’s running for his life or flat on his is unable to find even the fastest of athletes

Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award (I'd like to thank my producer, my director, all of my wonderful fans ... )
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
Come back, Jason!
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Jan 15, 2011 1:01 PM CST reply actions  

mccluster/arenas on returns also lets us use our weapon more often in colquitt with better starting field position leading to coffin corner punts

didnt happen asmuch this year

but it will make a huge difference…we still need more team speed as is

Team Pioli/Haley. Decade of the Chiefs.
Team Colquitt

by SDChief on Jan 15, 2011 1:01 PM CST reply actions  

I agree we need a NT and with the idea that a great one can change a game(even though Fairley isn't a NT and Auburn dont run a 3-4).

Looking back at that draft it appears there really wasn’t a great one available anyway. I think we scored on those two picks for the long term and we’ll have more drafts and free agency periods to get the right guy at NT.

"Success is never ending, failure is never final."

by GenericBrand on Jan 15, 2011 2:06 PM CST reply actions  

Sadly,

2009 was our chance to grab a NT that was worthy of a top 10 pick in BJ Raji. We went for TJax and I haven’t given up on him yet, but I agree, there wasn’t a great prospect last year to me.

Snap the f*cking ball, Brodie.

by scottbwalters on Jan 16, 2011 2:05 AM CST up reply actions  

McCluster is a good pick...this is all hind sight 20/20 + dream scinereo

I think McCluster will still pan out. I bet he is worked into more plays next year.

anyways, this is my dream scinereo

Free agent moves

NT….. Holoti Nagata…at any frickin price if he falls from the ravens
OLB…Lamar Woodley….Kinda like geting a proven Von Miller with experience
WR…Breaston….If Larry Fitz is available this year all bets are off..trade a 1st and 3rd

draft
1st ….Jake Locker….if he falls…I know its controversial..but we need to be grooming a QB
2nd…Wisinwiski….trade up with the 2nd and 3rd…and maybe a 5th pick

let the scouts work magic on the 4th-7th picks.

I think a pull like that would be AWESOME…maybe better than last years draft/pick up

The most controversial is the QB…I think Cassel is the right rebuilding QB but not the franchise QB a Super Bowl bound team needs.

The up side with the Locker pick is this…if Cassel performs next year….and Locker turns out to be the real deal….You might be able to get a 1st outa Cassel then plug Locker in for the next year….The Locker deal is the only move that might..might net us another 1st round pick in 2012 if Cassel has a banner year.

Team Berry

by MasterBlaster7 on Jan 15, 2011 3:26 PM CST reply actions  

You cant give a QB more than that when building a Super Bowl team

I dont know why the Cassel apologist always jump all over me.

I have never called for Cassels immediate replacement.

I have always said we need a potential franchise QB to be groomed so as to hedge or bets on Cassel for the next few years.

To get a QB ready you should really groom him at least a year. Lets say Cassel doesnt pan out in 2013…then we get a QB in 2014 (I guarantee not the caliber of Locker)…groom him in the 2014 season…then play him in 2015 for his rookie outing….its a LONG lead time.

Team Berry

by MasterBlaster7 on Jan 15, 2011 4:44 PM CST reply actions  

It just isn't going to happen.

They’ve given the keys to Cassel, he’s getting the opportunity to lead the team for the foreseeable future. And yes, you do need a QB to groom, but on a team like KC where there are needs everywhere, you don’t use up a 1st rounder on a QB when you have a firm starter in place. They will likely try to get a developmental QB in the late rounds or bring someone in (Alex Smith anyone?) to work out and be ready to step in for injuries.

Its not being a Cassel apologist to think its crazy to use a 1st rounder on QB next year. Its just being realistic and logical.

Snap the f*cking ball, Brodie.

by scottbwalters on Jan 16, 2011 2:09 AM CST up reply actions  

You know who was realistic and logical?

Marty Schottenheimer….think about that for a bit.

Team Berry

by MasterBlaster7 on Jan 16, 2011 8:10 PM CST up reply actions  

Our line play was OK

That doesn’t mean it couldn’t be better. I still say we need line help, both sides, and linebacker and WR could use some help,. too.

DMC wasn’t a bad pick, but maybe we coulda done better there.

But the team across the board could stand to get better in 2011

Needs for 2010:
O-line
D-line
Linebacker
Safety

by Bleedingredandgold on Jan 15, 2011 9:44 PM CST reply actions  

I dont if we have been watching the same games fellas

but DMC does not make people miss. The phrase “make people miss” is for someone who does it on a consistent basis. Not he jukes a guy or breaks a tackle every 8 games. Eric Berry has broken more tackles and juked more people than McCluster this season.

by JC25FoMVP on Jan 16, 2011 2:07 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog! Follow us on Facebook and on Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Chiefs OTA's: Some Real Football News
Dscn3246_3_small
Worst Case Scenario
Lips-rhps_small
Translating Coachspeak (Humor & Satire)

Recent FanPosts

Supernova1007_small
What Does it Take?
Ford-mustang-gt-2011-wallpaper-02_small
Hope
New_kc_helm_small
Scott Pioli: Genuine Mastermind Part 1 - Quarterbacks
Dirtyhippy_small
The Epic Battle of Pittsburgh(Game 9 preview)
Spit_small
A Unique Look At Elite QB's and Ricky Stanzi
309look_small
Cassel, can the chiefs get a ring on his back?
Small
Trade McCluster...
Supernova1007_small
A New 3-4 team in the NFL
Supernova1007_small
Fashionistas

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Ct_fb_small Chris Thorman

Headshot_small Joel Thorman

Editors

288-chiefstexans0944_sp_8-15-09_jfs woodman212

Matt_ssv_pic_small_small Matt Conner

Stag_20silhouette_small stagdsp

Lips-rhps_small upamtn

Contributors

Kc_ny_small NJ Chiefs Fan

Phoenix_by_melen_small KaloPhoenix

N1358340181_30185582_5800_small Flowers24

Small Jon Yoon

Dirkness_small HisDirkness

Dscn3246_3_small MNchiefsfan

Cassel_small Steve_in_RI