Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: VIDEO: Veterans Share Favorite Sports Memories

What To Do With Chiefs DEs Tyson Jackson And Shaun Smith

Photo

It would appear that Kansas City Chiefs DE Tyson Jackson will be returning from injury on Oct. 10 when the Chiefs head to Indianapolis to play the Colts. His initial injury was reported as a sprained MCL which usually only keeps players out a couple of weeks.

For Jackson, I'm wondering if his job will be there when he gets back.

DE Shaun Smith has been filling in for him and, frankly, been a more disruptive force than Jackson.

3-4 defensive ends are tough to judge because there's not a great way to statistically analyze them. Tackles and sacks are important but they can do their job even without tackles or sacks.

If my eye test matters (it doesn't), then Smith has been a better performer over two games than Jackson has. He's making more plays in the backfield and generally getting noticed more than Jackson.

So when Jackson returns will his starting job come along with it?

This problem is both good and bad. It's good because you have a guy like Shaun Smith who was expected to play a limited role and is now trying to force himself into the starting job. It's bad because, well, Jackson is the third overall pick and we shouldn't be having this conversation.

Maybe the coaches see something I don't and Jackson returns to the starting lineup. Or maybe Smith takes the job. The Chiefs will have a couple of weeks to decide before they hit Indy.

Comment 128 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

At this point

Keep Smith as starter and rotate Jackson in. Let Jackson earn his starting job back.

by golfbard on Sep 28, 2010 11:20 AM CDT reply actions   2 recs

agreed

maybe if we had started 0-3 i’d say let him continue to develop, but right now we need our best players in

by 03eltond on Sep 28, 2010 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yep.

The worst thing that could have happened to T-jack is his absense being unnoticed. It was.

CREATE. COACH. CONQUER! Check out the new FREE baseball MMO -- coming soon!
Two Out Rally, BASEBALL MMORPG | Facebook | @2OutRally

by Justin Bopp on Sep 28, 2010 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

I noticed it in the Browns game.

I think playing at home provides a spark. I think Jackson should be rotated in and out until his limp is gone. But, ultimately, it should be his job. He earned another chance with the way he played against the Chargers.

by SupremeChief on Sep 28, 2010 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

HE STARTS

I think TJ was making progress prior to his injury and because of that, he starts. Of course, it also depends on how he practices but I would imagine Romeo would like to have him back in the rotation.

Just keep matriculatin' the ball down the field, boys.

by KCnDC on Sep 28, 2010 11:21 AM CDT reply actions  

Based on your first line you would think Haley posted this ;)

Just kidding.. but yea also no need to rush him right back in.

by golfbard on Sep 28, 2010 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'd say start Jackson

And have Smith rotate as the NT and DE. Jackson played well the first week.

Predictions:
This year IS be better.
oh, and...
Todd Haley doesn't give a damn about your fantasy team.

by jmcgoblue on Sep 28, 2010 11:22 AM CDT reply actions  

Yeah, Smith has looked good

But no better than TJax did before he went out hurt. Jackson was playing several levels above what he was last year and should only get better.

Chiefs - back in the playoffs in 2011.

by TRSChief on Sep 28, 2010 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

agreed with both TRS and jmc

it’s Jackson’s job, and Smith was actually playing better at NT in game one than he did at DE

Arrowhead Pride: a place to intelligently discuss pros and cons of things that aren’t likely to actually happen, and things of which we have zero control or input

by stagdsp on Sep 28, 2010 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah. I see more hay being made with Smith in the swing role.

The subtext, here, imo, is that Magee isn’t yet the designated swing player.

Jackson’s a little more mobile in space, and more likely to create pressure and/or block a pass if the offense throws on 1st/2nd down.

But it’s a tough call. The mental part of Smith’s game is virtually flawless. He REALLY understands the job description, and surprised me with his ability to contain two pretty mobile QBs in back-to-back games. As far as run-stout, I’d put him a notch ABOVE Jackson.

"I ain't lyin' 'bout nothin'."
"Oh? So what exactly are you lying about?"

by hmills110 on Sep 29, 2010 7:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

From Kalo's post...

Jackson was tearing it up against SD before he got hurt.

Let me find it…

I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.

by MNchiefsfan on Sep 28, 2010 11:22 AM CDT reply actions  

Found it

This sounds like a guy I want back in the starting lineup for us.

Smith’s been good, but we know what we have in him. Plus, with him on the bench we can rotate him at DE and NT and keep both fresh.

I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.

by MNchiefsfan on Sep 28, 2010 11:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

From Kalo's post.
As seen in the bullet points up above, Tyson was in rare form this week. Six gaps filled, four double teams, and a quarterback pressure on the positive side, with two free men on the negative side. Before his injury, he was causing all sorts of problems for the right side of San Diego’s offensive line. They couldn’t budge him off the line, and while he let two guys get to the second level, both of those plays he made up for it by stepping into the gap and making the tackle. He’ll be missed against Cleveland, as he looked every part of a stud strongside 3-4 defensive end this week. Keep that fire, Tyson!

Overall KPM: 12 Points

by saskwatch on Sep 28, 2010 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hey! You stole my thunder

By doing what I did, only much much better!

Now stop it!

I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.

by MNchiefsfan on Sep 28, 2010 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was going to say the same thinhg.

Jackson was playing out of his mind when he got hurt. Start Jackson, rotate Smith in.

by saskwatch on Sep 28, 2010 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Smith has been a disruptive force

A groin-grabbingly disruptive force.

The plan for their usage shouldn’t change after a couple of games.

by Offense of the 70s on Sep 28, 2010 11:25 AM CDT reply actions  

When Cox come onto the field

Smith gives him a big bear hug.

Yeah, I just wrote that.

by NJ Chiefs Fan on Sep 28, 2010 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

Rec

That was fantastic,

I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.

by MNchiefsfan on Sep 28, 2010 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hey...

at least Smith was able to grab two sacks…

2010 Chiefs are on the rise. This is the most excited I've been since 'Nam...

by kcchiefsfan72 on Sep 28, 2010 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

It doesn't matter who starts...

unless it matters to TJax or Nutcracker…I think both will benefit from the rotation that we will see…

TJax looked like a real contributor before he went out in the 4th quarter vs. SD…In fact, after game 1 he was the player I was most excited to watch again…It was night and day with his play from last season…

by OnlyKCFanNVA on Sep 28, 2010 11:25 AM CDT reply actions  

HaHa Nutcracker

TJax was making progress, now just have Smith show him how to grab opposing players junk and he may be unstoppable. Actually, it’s probably better to have TJax start so Smith can play DE and NT, he will still get a lot of snaps doing that where TJax can’t really move inside.

Insert witty yet thought provoking phrase here.

by Fozzyboyd on Sep 28, 2010 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

Actually, I bet T-Jax COULD move inside.

And with Smith on the field, swapping spots with Smith could complicate things more for the offense than the defense. Jackson could be a real disruptor up the gut, and the way Smith’s been playing, KC has the luxury of moving him outside.

"I ain't lyin' 'bout nothin'."
"Oh? So what exactly are you lying about?"

by hmills110 on Sep 29, 2010 7:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Start Smith

And save Charles for the right situations.

by sunny D on Sep 28, 2010 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

What?

I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.

by MNchiefsfan on Sep 28, 2010 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nice transition

We can now pull out all of the JC / TJ posts and replace the names with Smith and Jackson. And here I thought the bye week was going to be boring.

This space for rent.

by Druful on Sep 28, 2010 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes - Interchangeable

Search & replace combined with cut & paste will make it easier for our mobile users. ;)

by sunny D on Sep 28, 2010 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Switch to the 4-3.

If someone asks you if you want extra mayonnaise you have to say yes, cus that's part of it.
-Jared Allen

by JComp11 on Sep 28, 2010 11:29 AM CDT reply actions  

SORRY I FORGOT THE SARCASM FONT!!!!!

If someone asks you if you want extra mayonnaise you have to say yes, cus that's part of it.
-Jared Allen

by JComp11 on Sep 28, 2010 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Bring back junior siavvi

I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.

by MNchiefsfan on Sep 28, 2010 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Bring back Ryan Sims

Hey, if we are going to bring up disappointing D-lineman might as bring up the worst. Oh god, it makes me sad to think of how many draft picks we have used on them.

Insert witty yet thought provoking phrase here.

by Fozzyboyd on Sep 28, 2010 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't be afraid to run some 4-3, here and there.

And with Hali runnin’ 260, it’s not like their vanilla 4-man rush doesn’t amount to a 4-3. You don’t have to cheat Dorsey very far inside and Smith/Edwards very far to the left to have a 4-3. I can see just going BIG, with Gilberry at ROLB/RDE, with Hali the 5th man upfield from inside or outside.

These guys are getting comfortable enough with their roles to start playing some street ball, pretty soon. Need to see further developments from the rookie safeties before THAT happens, imo. Also, imo, we might just SEE those developments after the bye. They’re not far from being a real shutdown defense. Indy will be a great test.

"I ain't lyin' 'bout nothin'."
"Oh? So what exactly are you lying about?"

by hmills110 on Sep 29, 2010 8:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

i say start smith and ease tjax into the game. no need to rush tjax

after and injury like that.

FOUR F'S FIND UM FEEL UM FUGUM FORGET UM.

by sexassassin on Sep 28, 2010 11:29 AM CDT reply actions  

Good call, if he's even a little hesitant

Hopefully, with the bye he’ll have had at least a week of full contact practice and be ready to go.

I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.

by MNchiefsfan on Sep 28, 2010 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yup.

"I ain't lyin' 'bout nothin'."
"Oh? So what exactly are you lying about?"

by hmills110 on Sep 29, 2010 8:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

you have to start Tyson Jackson

For the sole reason that smith can play NT at a disruptive level as well. With Tyson Jackson and Ron Edwards rotating and staying fresh, its almost not fair to opposong llinemen.

That said, in IND you have to go with the hot hand, whoever is performing better needs to be in more, IND’s hurry up offense won’t give us much opportunity to rotate

2010 predictions live by em die by em
- Chiefs do what they did last year and double their win total.. Good for a second place finish in the AFC West
-McCluster is considered for ROY, doesn't win it
- Arenas takes two to the house
- Carr becomes a legitimate corner
-Flowers gets jipped in Pro Bowl voting

by 808NaNz808 on Sep 28, 2010 11:33 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

It's not as MUCH to Indy's advantage to freeze the substitutions, though.

KC’s better-conditioned and it’s harder to catch them in an inferior personnel grouping.

That being said, might there be a timeout on D at some point, to make a situational substitution on a key 3rd down?

"I ain't lyin' 'bout nothin'."
"Oh? So what exactly are you lying about?"

by hmills110 on Sep 29, 2010 8:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Start TJax

Bring Smith in in relief. It works like our RB situation. The more fresh impact players you have the better off you’ll be

by RamX21 on Sep 28, 2010 11:33 AM CDT reply actions  

good problem to have

Jackson is the younger with a higher cieling, but frankly Smith has been the King of the Ball…its really a great problem for Romeo to have, his rotation is getting easier.

Old guys rule...yeah you might have youth and talent on your side...but I have time and treachery...

by The G on Sep 28, 2010 11:41 AM CDT reply actions  

Hey, somebody had to say it!

Seriously, I thought Jackson was noticeable in the first game. I remember thinking how much more of a factor he was in that game then what he had been. I agree with so many comments already, DL play is most effective when you have enough depth to have a quality rotation. They don’t tend to line up the same 3 or 4 guys and play them the whole game, so the question is more about whether or not adding TJax back into the rotation is better than the worst of the current rotation subs? I think that’s an obvious YES, so I only see this as a good thing.

by etp_stl on Sep 28, 2010 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hey, somebody had to say it!

Seriously, I thought Jackson was noticeable in the first game. I remember thinking how much more of a factor he was in that game then what he had been. I agree with so many comments already, DL play is most effective when you have enough depth to have a quality rotation. They don’t tend to line up the same 3 or 4 guys and play them the whole game, so the question is more about whether or not adding TJax back into the rotation is better than the worst of the current rotation subs? I think that’s an obvious YES, so I only see this as a good thing.

by etp_stl on Sep 28, 2010 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

The coaches have a big decision to make.

Shaun Smith has turned into an important part of our defense. Whether Jackson starts or not, Smith with see significant playing time. I have no doubt of that.

"The Hammer"

by G.L. on Sep 28, 2010 11:42 AM CDT reply actions  

Jax better vs Pass and Smith better vs Run

and since we’re playing indy i say Jax, but keep smith in the rotation heavily, He needs i think 40% of the D snaps at either position, I hope he is the primary rotation guy for both Jax and edwards cause he’s more effective than Toribio at nose

by irishking44 on Sep 28, 2010 11:43 AM CDT reply actions  

but then again Smith is the better bull rusher and Indy always has those kind of undersized finesse linemen

so maybe smith, but i’d feel more comfortable rotating smith in at DE and NT than Toribio and Gilberry (in run situations) or magee

by irishking44 on Sep 28, 2010 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Indy has gone with more of a power blocking line

Which is why we have Lilja in the first place.

They’ve changed things up since last season.

Chiefs - back in the playoffs in 2011.

by TRSChief on Sep 28, 2010 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

And early indications are that they're experiencing some growth pains.

Running against San Diego isn’t saying much for your power game. The Bolts may find their stride up front, after McNeil arrives, assuming Vasquez decides to stay healthy. But so far, San Diego has pretty much the same problems up front that they had last year, imo. Rivers can make you overlook that fact, but the Chiefs weren’t afraid the Bolts were gonna ram the ball down their throats at the end of the monsoon game. All SD could do was throw the ball, and it gets REALLY HARD to throw the ball in the red zone.

"I ain't lyin' 'bout nothin'."
"Oh? So what exactly are you lying about?"

by hmills110 on Sep 29, 2010 8:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

You have to start Tyson

He is the top pick and he has way more potential then our very own physical dr.

You should not lose your starting gig after two games of injury! He was starting for a reason….he is our guy! Smith can fill in when he is needed.

"One of the teams asked me a running back question," McCluster said. "They said when you have the ball, do you focus on the guy who's in front of you or the next guy.

"I told them 99% of the time, I'm going to make that first guy miss. Then, I'm onto the next."

by Matt_Grbac on Sep 28, 2010 11:43 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

I would

But he may not understand a word I say…..wow I should not have said that!

"One of the teams asked me a running back question," McCluster said. "They said when you have the ball, do you focus on the guy who's in front of you or the next guy.

"I told them 99% of the time, I'm going to make that first guy miss. Then, I'm onto the next."

by Matt_Grbac on Sep 28, 2010 6:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Disagree, Matt_Grbac.

You have to earn your way back. That means outplaying the other guy on the practice field and outplaying him in regulation, because if Jackson suits up, he WILL get onto the field.

I think it likely that Jackson DOES win his job back in short order, judging by his effectiveness in Game 1 and the number of snaps they gave Dorsey and him in that game.

That being said, I bet they’re quicker to rotate Smith in at LDE than they were in Game 1, especially coming off the MCL.

"I ain't lyin' 'bout nothin'."
"Oh? So what exactly are you lying about?"

by hmills110 on Sep 29, 2010 8:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sounds like Marty balls

Put Grbac back in. I dont care if Gannon is the man. We are paying Grbac all this dough. Could of been a King Carl decision for all I know. Anyway this is much different. Both will see plenty of action if they are healthy. Seems si
ilar to the jones vs Charles debate. Right now it’s a good problem to have. Depth is one of the keys to victory

by paulredfish on Sep 28, 2010 2:50 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

For sure!!

"One of the teams asked me a running back question," McCluster said. "They said when you have the ball, do you focus on the guy who's in front of you or the next guy.

"I told them 99% of the time, I'm going to make that first guy miss. Then, I'm onto the next."

by Matt_Grbac on Sep 28, 2010 6:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yup.

"I ain't lyin' 'bout nothin'."
"Oh? So what exactly are you lying about?"

by hmills110 on Sep 29, 2010 8:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Its a good problem

If the defense wasn’t being effective enough now we have a guy who’s been playing pretty good who can rotate into two positions keeping everyone and himself fresh.

"Success is never ending, failure is never final."

by GenericBrand on Sep 28, 2010 11:44 AM CDT reply actions  

smiths versatility kind of hurts him in that sense

we can’t have him start and relieve Ron and Glenn effectively too

by irishking44 on Sep 28, 2010 11:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

Schlong Smith...

should be the one rotating…

Playoffs are a REAL possibility in 2010...just need few tweeks here and there.

by KCinAZ on Sep 28, 2010 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was impressed with Jackson

before he went out. Especially against the run, his edge stayed sealed. I would start jackson and have smith essentially be the depth DL.

by SillyHatDay on Sep 28, 2010 11:47 AM CDT reply actions  

yeah basically what ive been trying to say these last couple posts

Having Glenn, Ron, and TJax start with Smith being the main guy for all of them for relief IMHO more than makes up for the times we would probably get burned having Toribio, Magee and even gilberry (against the run)

by irishking44 on Sep 28, 2010 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

+1

I think his play just made Magee very expendable.

"Success is never ending, failure is never final."

by GenericBrand on Sep 28, 2010 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

-0.01

3rd-rounder with upside and great character… Unless Magee is failing to make progress (or worse, stinkin’ up the joint in practices), you give him another year or two in the system. Even if Magee was a genius pick, he might not really show the world what a genius you were, until late ’10 or even mid ’11. Might be a great complementary player, if a Wilfork falls in your lap, and Dorsey decides he needs to cash in to care for a sick relative more than he needs to be a Chief.

"I ain't lyin' 'bout nothin'."
"Oh? So what exactly are you lying about?"

by hmills110 on Sep 29, 2010 8:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Is this really even a question?

After what Tyson showed the first game, if healthy he should definitely be inserted back into the starting lineup. Smith is a valuable backup who can take snaps at end and nose to keep these guys fresh.

by polodude017 on Sep 28, 2010 11:56 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Agreed

That Thorman guy is just trying to stir up controversy.

by sunny D on Sep 28, 2010 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Jackson Starts

Smith is more valuable than Jackson because he can rotate with Ron Edwards and Jackson. Keeping Edwards fresh is what separates this defense from last year’s. Edwards is a disruptive force when he’s not worn out by the end of the 3rd quarter.

by JayrodT on Sep 28, 2010 11:57 AM CDT reply actions  

Yep Edwards just played way too much last year.

And this year with Tiribio rotating in Edwards seems to be playing better as well.

"Success is never ending, failure is never final."

by GenericBrand on Sep 28, 2010 11:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Edwards got a sack for crying out loud

when was the last time any of us saw him have enough energy to actually even get into the backfield?

Ryan Succop will be the kicker for the AFC in the 2011 Pro Bowl

by PVChiefsfan on Sep 28, 2010 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

He FLEW in there too

I was impressed.

I love my wife, my kids, and the Chiefs. In that order. Except on game days.

by MNchiefsfan on Sep 28, 2010 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

He was way fast

I could not believe how fast he got to the QB on that sack, It was AWESOME!

I love it when a plan comes together!

by Spunky on Sep 28, 2010 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nice points, you guys.

Very nicely set up, it was. Play to hold the line all day long and then just shove your guy aside and shoot the gap. What impresses me the most is the footwork on our d-linemen. Keepin’ their feet, stayin’ in the play, and when the moment is ripe, make the explosive play.

"I ain't lyin' 'bout nothin'."
"Oh? So what exactly are you lying about?"

by hmills110 on Sep 29, 2010 8:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Doesn't matter who starts

Rotation rotation rotation! =)…this is gonna be 1 boring ass 2 weeks…damn you bye weeks! When did they change it from 2-1 bye?

by KCinIL on Sep 28, 2010 11:59 AM CDT reply actions  

I'm guessing that...

The Guards and Tackles around the league, and there nuts, are hopping the TJ gets his job back

by Stone Throwers on Sep 28, 2010 12:02 PM CDT reply actions  

Start jackson
  1. he was playing great before the injury, and he should have a higher ceiling than smith.
  2. smith can effectively spell the entire line, a fresh 4th quarter front 3 could be a big deal vs Peyton.
  3. its harder for nfl officials to see nut punches in the middle of the line if smith is playing nose tackle than it is if he is playing end, I want the penalties to continue to be on the other guys LOL.
    #4, with the video they have, Smith might be suspended a week anyways, who knows.

by Zimmy on Sep 28, 2010 12:04 PM CDT reply actions  

Saw this on a browns webpage

Said if Smith would like to protect his nuts and get out of the NFL suggested job for him

by bonesjackson on Sep 28, 2010 12:06 PM CDT reply actions  

If he is healthy, Tyson gets my vote.

If he is back to form, I thought he was doing better than Smith. That’s not to say that Smith was doing a bad job. Smith has been more than holding his own, and has been making good tackles on the runner, but has has not been pushing the pocket like Jackson was. Jackson was pushing the pocket so hard that he was opening huge holes for the LB to make plays. I agree with an earlier poster……this is a great problem to have.

by Enite on Sep 28, 2010 12:08 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Rec'd

1) The big IF TJ is healthy. The way Smith is playing, I would rather be over cautious, and make sure TJ is fully healthy, because our early bye, would like a healthy TJ for the long run.

2) The phrase “Smith has been more than holding his own.”

Dexter McCluster's 2010 "Broken Ankle" list:

9/13 vs SD, Mike Tolbert en route to 94-yard Punt Return for TD.
9/27 vs SF, Shawntae Spencer and Travis LaBoy en route to 31-yard TD catch and run.

by Carl C on Sep 28, 2010 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

T-jax over smith no doubt

Smith has been doing a great job, but Tyson was incredible in his first game. Tyson also has much more upside than Smith. By seasons end if Tyson continues his growth he is going to be a forced to be reckoned with.

Check out my blog on software development:
http://www.turnleafdesign.com/

by Scaryclouds on Sep 28, 2010 12:16 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Jackson playing out of control against SD.

He’s a first round pick that was living up to his potential in game 1, then got hurt. He’ll without a doubt be starting against the Colts.

"Reach for new elevation; and see just how high we can go. Full blown determination; will take us further than we know. My own anticipation; keeps the fire from burning out, It's time for domination... no one can ever take us down" - Pillar - "For the Love of the Game"

by Red N Gold Beast on Sep 28, 2010 12:17 PM CDT reply actions  

I was thinking about this right after both the Cleveland and the Niners game.

Smith is definitely taking over that spot as far as play ability and disruption. But Jackson has shown improvment. I’m not so sure its a bad thing for Jackson to take a backseat and ease into this position. He’s doing better than last year, so he’s getting it.

What would it hurt to limit him a little behind Smith and keep the guy in there that gives us the best chance to win right now?

Jackson has not played like Smth thus far thats for sure. Smith has been lights out.

by krayfish on Sep 28, 2010 12:20 PM CDT reply actions  

Didn't you watch the SD game?

Jackson was tearing it up before he got hurt… he put up 6 tackles through 3 quarters.

I’m guessing that by this:

Jackson has not played like Smth thus far thats for sure
you’re referring to the fondling that’s been going on?

"Reach for new elevation; and see just how high we can go. Full blown determination; will take us further than we know. My own anticipation; keeps the fire from burning out, It's time for domination... no one can ever take us down" - Pillar - "For the Love of the Game"

by Red N Gold Beast on Sep 28, 2010 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think SD has that great an OL.

But I agree with what was said above: Jackson pushes the pocket more. One of the reasons SD stayed in that monsoon game so long was KC’s failure to get to Rivers before Rivers could do something with the ball. Manning is very similar to Rivers (but more likeable, somehow). Execution in pass rush AND coverage will have to be at their very best to get Manning off the field.

"I ain't lyin' 'bout nothin'."
"Oh? So what exactly are you lying about?"

by hmills110 on Sep 29, 2010 8:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

I really agree. The front three have developed some chemistry over the last two weeks and

I would prefer to start Smith and then work Jackson in slowly, but even in the second series and then the coaches will decide from there based on how the game is progressing. Also, I sure wouldn’t want to see Jackson get injured again so they should take it easy.

by jcox31mc on Sep 28, 2010 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Being cautious with the injury is a good reason to ease Jackson in off the bench.

But if he has no ill effects in another week, with trainers, doctors and T-Jax in agreement, go ahead and start him. I think he gives the Chiefs their best chance of causing Manning problems from the get-go.

I DO think Manning’s more vulnerable to pressure than we’re used to seeing.

My big concern is that Indy may be able to stuff the box all day long, without KC having a legit aerial threat to punish them for it.

"I ain't lyin' 'bout nothin'."
"Oh? So what exactly are you lying about?"

by hmills110 on Sep 29, 2010 8:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

I beg to disagree Kray.

I love what Smith has been doing, but again I believe that Tyson was more dominant than Smith has been. Edwards has been playing better than he played in that 1st game also, but even with that, the line that I saw against the Chargers was dominant like I haven’t seen for a while. He was caving the pocket against better competition in my opinion. I do like Smith though.

by Enite on Sep 28, 2010 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jackson plays one position... Smith plays three.

Ergo, Jackson starts, and Smith rotates in where he’s needed.

I don’t think this is a difficult question at all.

by Tarkus on Sep 28, 2010 12:28 PM CDT reply actions  

Good point. Beyond that, the Chiefs were playing lights-out with Jackson in Game 1.

"I ain't lyin' 'bout nothin'."
"Oh? So what exactly are you lying about?"

by hmills110 on Sep 29, 2010 8:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

Everyone's hit the nail on the head.

Tyson was dominant against SD until hurt. The Smith/Edwards combo was dominant against SD until hurt. Toribio does not look like the answer to give Edwards some much needed rest. Smith has played well, but had a few key mistakes against Cleveland. Also, he’s been on the field almost as much as Dorsey.

Tyson should be fresh, let him start and hope that he didn’t lose the fire he had in Week 1. Have Smith rotate with he and Edwards, and have a nice fresh group of players.

"I don't know if I want to go to New York. They'll have to pay me a lot more money because I like it here in Kansas City." -- Roger Maris

by KaloPhoenix on Sep 28, 2010 12:36 PM CDT reply actions  

Very true

Smith’s ability to play mutliple positions will help keep the entire line fresh. Regularly rotating in Gilberry, Smith, and Magee should help us get some pressure on Manning. Actually, I think those three would make one heck of a nickel package D-line.

by Chiefs4Life on Sep 28, 2010 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Its gotta be Jackson

He played on a sloppy wet field , so comparing the play of them is kind of unfair to TJ….the rotation is better this with him starting as well. Smiths role of backing up both positions is perfect IMO…

Playoffs are a REAL possibility in 2010...just need few tweeks here and there.

by KCinAZ on Sep 28, 2010 12:45 PM CDT reply actions  

Definitely, definitely, definitely Jackson

Not to shortchange what Shaun Smith did against San Fran and Cleveland, but also recognize that he did it against two below average Tackles whereas Jackson did it against a pretty good one.

Jackson looked like an absolute beast against San Diego. I think he clearly gets the benefit of the doubt.

by Jon Yoon on Sep 28, 2010 12:51 PM CDT reply actions  

Teach Jackson how to grab nutz.

well. seriously it can’t be that hard. Jaskson will start. Smith has earned a role on the team as a back up DL for all three spots. And not just a – coes in when someone gets hurt guy- but a regular rotation guy.

by tenacious rdc on Sep 28, 2010 12:58 PM CDT reply actions  

What's the old saying?

rotation, rotation, rotation…

2010 Chiefs are on the rise. This is the most excited I've been since 'Nam...

by kcchiefsfan72 on Sep 28, 2010 1:01 PM CDT reply actions  

Can T. Jackson...

grab a sac or two to encourage Unsportsmanlike Conduct? If so…Let him have the spot back, but let him understand it is his spot to lose…

by ChiefsatWar on Sep 28, 2010 1:07 PM CDT reply actions  

I thought Jackson was playing like an absolute BEAST before he got hurt

so I’m not sure how you’re justifying that Smith is playing better unless you’re going back to preseason. If that’s the case, I don’t think it’s a valid comparison. I’m assuming TJack will start and take the job back from Smith. I think Smith’s ability to back up both positions makes him a very valuable (and involved) backup. The bad news is really for Magee. He’s going to have to step up his game or he’s going to be out on the street.

The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made. ~ Groucho Marx

by Big Chief on Sep 28, 2010 1:48 PM CDT reply actions  

I'd show more patience with the 3rd-round d-lineman.

"I ain't lyin' 'bout nothin'."
"Oh? So what exactly are you lying about?"

by hmills110 on Sep 29, 2010 8:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jackson is probably the more skilled of the two

and for that reason if his is fully back he should be starting. I think that Smith’s impact has been much more on the attitude side. He has brought back the nasty attitude that this defense needs. He is the first guy out there trying to get the crowd going and he must be a real nightmare for the other team to listen to talk all game. Both guys are incredibly valuable for the success of this team going forward.

Jamie freakin Wright, nuff said.

by Gantz9 on Sep 28, 2010 1:52 PM CDT reply actions  

Jackson was looking pretty nasty when he was out there as well.

I remember him barking while towering over opposing players after tackling them. I love it.

by Enite on Sep 28, 2010 1:54 PM CDT reply actions  

Lots of jokes about Smith's actions

but we may not have to worry about who starts as I believe Smith will get a 1 game suspension now thta there is video footage of the 2nd allegation. Or will he just get fined? I’d find that hard to believe. I know things happen in the pile but the dick grabbing is odd to me. I was bothered by it during the Clev game. Then to hear it again. Smith’s antics could hinder this squad eventually and that profile does not fit the “right 53” so I’m concerned about his future playing as we need his depth but not his antics.

Mr J
KC Chiefs Fan

by Mr J on Sep 28, 2010 2:30 PM CDT reply actions  

Jackson is Lazy!

I would start Smith and rotate Jackson in. That lazy piece of Cattle Dung Jackson needs motivation and I would make him in earn it. Got to motivate him somehow, 60 million has made him lazy!

by BigRatt on Sep 28, 2010 2:32 PM CDT reply actions  

lazy?

Hows that?

Mr J
KC Chiefs Fan

by Mr J on Sep 28, 2010 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Erm, did you watch the SD game?

Chiefs - back in the playoffs in 2011.

by TRSChief on Sep 28, 2010 9:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

uh yeah

one of tjack’s best games ever. You obviously dont care for the guy. I think its his demeanor that gets to people. he comes off quiet ans soft. Yet he was great in Sd game. As i see below, others agree

Mr J
KC Chiefs Fan

by Mr J on Sep 29, 2010 12:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

That has to be a reply fail.

I was asking BigRatt if he watched, not you. Look again at who the reply is to.

Chiefs - back in the playoffs in 2011.

by TRSChief on Sep 29, 2010 8:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Mr J

As a former Semi Pro player. I can tell you squeezing the old nads on the bottom of the pile screws with the dudes mind. In the back of his mind it does create a little fear, its a great way to get an edge! I love IT!!

by BigRatt on Sep 28, 2010 2:34 PM CDT reply actions  

may explain why you never went pro

I hate when guys get on this site and tell us they played high school ball or “semi pro”.

Mr J
KC Chiefs Fan

by Mr J on Sep 29, 2010 1:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

He's right on this point, though

The pile is kind of a no-man’s land.

It’s not 100% anything-goes, but it’s damn close. That’s been the way of football since football came to be.

The trenches are not for the faint of heart.

Chiefs - back in the playoffs in 2011.

by TRSChief on Sep 29, 2010 8:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't understand.

I remember people being excited about Jackson’s performance against the Chargers. It wasn’t just the fans either. I even remember the media talking about it. What happened to that?

by KCMizzou on Sep 28, 2010 2:44 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Whatever people see most recent, they remember

Tyson WAS better in his half than Shaun has been since, but that doesn’t add controversy. This does, so they’re putting it out there.

by dablueguy on Sep 28, 2010 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think it's more about the fact that the D didn't crack.

They played very well with Jackson sidelined, and Smith did a solid job.

"I ain't lyin' 'bout nothin'."
"Oh? So what exactly are you lying about?"

by hmills110 on Sep 29, 2010 8:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Chargers = Dorsey!

Dorsey was the beast in the Charger game. Jackson played better than normal, but for the most part he just strikes me as the type of guy who does the least amount to get by. He already has his money and the only thing left to motivate him and teach him that he has to bring it every down is to give Smith the starting nod and make Jackson earn his spot. That in my mind is the only to teach him something. Smith in my mind has outplayed Jackson by far.. As Joel said he is definately been more disruptive in the backfield which is something that Jackson just doesn’t do. His MO was stopping the run which at times he gets pushed plum out of play.

by BigRatt on Sep 28, 2010 2:49 PM CDT reply actions  

You should go back and watch the SD game

I replayed it once just to see the line play and I couldn’t believe how TJax was ALWAYS around the ball. And his blockers were not able to move him at all. He was incredible for that half he played. I think if he plays like that the rest of the year there’s going to be a lot of talk about how Pioli was right in his pick.

The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made. ~ Groucho Marx

by Big Chief on Sep 28, 2010 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Tyson Played better in his half a game than Shaun has since

Shaun has played great, but Tyson was beastly. And there is so much room to grow. Tyson is on the verge of becoming the best 5 Tech in the NFL. Let him continue to do so. Also, starting Tyson allows Shaun to go back to his best role, filling in at both DE and NT, keeping everybody fresh, without any drop in play, and in some cases(NT) an increase in play.

by dablueguy on Sep 28, 2010 2:56 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

REMEMBER

Smith can play both ends, and they have experimented with Dorsey at NT. There may be a time where we see all three with Dorsey on the nose.

Different formations different matchup, which is what Crennell is all about. My MVP

by Mark in Ga. on Sep 28, 2010 5:23 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog! Follow us on Facebook and on Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Chiefs OTA's: Some Real Football News
Dscn3246_3_small
Worst Case Scenario
Lips-rhps_small
Translating Coachspeak (Humor & Satire)

Recent FanPosts

Supernova1007_small
What Does it Take?
Ford-mustang-gt-2011-wallpaper-02_small
Hope
New_kc_helm_small
Scott Pioli: Genuine Mastermind Part 1 - Quarterbacks
Dirtyhippy_small
The Epic Battle of Pittsburgh(Game 9 preview)
Spit_small
A Unique Look At Elite QB's and Ricky Stanzi
309look_small
Cassel, can the chiefs get a ring on his back?
Small
Trade McCluster...
Supernova1007_small
A New 3-4 team in the NFL
Supernova1007_small
Fashionistas

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Ct_fb_small Chris Thorman

Headshot_small Joel Thorman

Editors

288-chiefstexans0944_sp_8-15-09_jfs woodman212

Matt_ssv_pic_small_small Matt Conner

Stag_20silhouette_small stagdsp

Lips-rhps_small upamtn

Contributors

Kc_ny_small NJ Chiefs Fan

Phoenix_by_melen_small KaloPhoenix

N1358340181_30185582_5800_small Flowers24

Small Jon Yoon

Dirkness_small HisDirkness

Dscn3246_3_small MNchiefsfan

Cassel_small Steve_in_RI