Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Leandro Damiao Is Still Really Good

NFL Roster Cuts: Chiefs Bottom Of The Roster Position Battles (Defensive Edition)

Photo

We continue on looking at the bottom-of-the-roster position battles. We've already looked at the offense and here's a look at a couple of interesting battles on the defensive side of the ball at the bottom of the roster.

  • Third and fourth defensive ends: If the Chiefs keep four defensive ends, the starters, Glenn Dorsey and Tyson Jackson are guaranteed spots on the team and I think Wallace Gilberry is about as guaranteed as it gets. I think Shaun Smith, who started playing some defensive end a few weeks ago, has a spot on the roster. He can play nose tackle as well so that's a plus-one when it comes to versatility. That leaves Dion Gales and Alex Magee as the odd men out if four are kept.
  • Inside linebackers: The first four on the inside are locks: Corey Mays, Demorrio Williams, Derrick Johnson and Jovan Belcher. There's probably another spot (maybe two) for special teams. The remaining options are Justin Cole, David Herron and Cory Greenwood. Herron was on the team last year.
  • Fifth safety: Here are the safeties I think are locks: Eric Berry at strong safety and Jon McGraw and Kendrick Lewis at free safety. That's three locks and I think there are possibly two more spots open for backups and special teams. That leaves Reshard Langford (SS), DaJuan Morgan (SS) and Donald Washington (FS). This is a tough call since it's hard to judge their special teams ability. I'm going to guess Langford and Washington stay. They were both picked by this regime and I'm not sure they're ready to give up on them yet.

It'll be interesting to see how those defensive ends shake out because the Chiefs rotate them in and out somewhat frequently with Gilberry coming in on the nickel defense. After the first four, the inside linebacker job won't be that interesting as the next guy in that group would be playing almost exclusively special teams.

Comment 87 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

My guesses:

Gales is out. He just doesn’t do it, and struggled terribly last year when called upon. Magee’s not terribly better, but I think they’ll give the 2nd year guy another shot.

Cole is out. Greenwood’s been making plays this preseason, and Herron knows the system. Cole just seems like the odd guy out. That nullified TD from his holding penalty won’t help, either.

Morgan is out. It comes down to Morgan and Washington…and I think this regime will keep a guy that they drafted over one they didn’t.

"I don't know if I want to go to New York. They'll have to pay me a lot more money because I like it here in Kansas City." -- Roger Maris

by KaloPhoenix on Aug 31, 2010 12:43 PM CDT reply actions  

Agreed On Morgan

He’s done little to nothing since he was drafted to show he’ll develop into a decent starting player or good backup. Washington’s more attractive because he’s at least an unknown quantity. Morgan will get the axe. They were interested in getting rid of him last year as I recall but had no other options.

Moderator - Arrowhead Pride

by UCrawford on Aug 31, 2010 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

dangled him to Gunther in Detroit

and even then they didn’t bite.

The picture is a Chiefs pumpkin, yeah that is right a Chiefs pumpkin.

by jrcnc on Aug 31, 2010 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

maybe both?

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

thats what I was thinking

the only one of those 3 that I think have a shot at the team is Daniels

Chiefs Will

by tomahawk44 on Aug 31, 2010 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think Herron needs to go

he might be at the top of my list

too many mistakes, IMO

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 1:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah Herron will be gone

The picture is a Chiefs pumpkin, yeah that is right a Chiefs pumpkin.

by jrcnc on Aug 31, 2010 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Greenwood has two tackles on kickoff/punt returns that I saw

except both plays he got in the way of McCluster and Arenas. I still like the kid and think he deserves to stay, but he’s gotta do a better job of not getting in the way of our return guys.

...And as the roar of 80,000 red-clad great plains warriors fills the hallowed halls of Arrowhead, it will strike fear into the hearts of lesser men. For on that field, individual men toil for something greater than individual honors. They toil as brothers-in-arms, as 53 spirits striving towards a single purpose and driven by a single goal: The glory that comes with vanquishing your foes. They will achieve their birthright, they will be champions.

by Sudden on Aug 31, 2010 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

by getting in the way

is he getting pushed into our blockers or just posting up.

The picture is a Chiefs pumpkin, yeah that is right a Chiefs pumpkin.

by jrcnc on Aug 31, 2010 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

so who was he tackling if McCluster and Arenas were returning?

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

He got in McCluster and Arenas' way

Each one of them had a long return going and they ended up running into Greenwood as he got turned around by a blocker. Not a big deal, because he was making good blocks downfield and its hard as hell to get out of the way of a fast one like McCluster, but just something I had noticed.

...And as the roar of 80,000 red-clad great plains warriors fills the hallowed halls of Arrowhead, it will strike fear into the hearts of lesser men. For on that field, individual men toil for something greater than individual honors. They toil as brothers-in-arms, as 53 spirits striving towards a single purpose and driven by a single goal: The glory that comes with vanquishing your foes. They will achieve their birthright, they will be champions.

by Sudden on Aug 31, 2010 4:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

gotcha

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think they should keep Alex Magee around. I don’t know if they will but they should.

by squirrelmasterz on Aug 31, 2010 12:56 PM CDT reply actions  

I think they will

I think they keep 4 DE (Dorsey, Jackson, Gilberry, Magee), 1 NT (Edwards) and 1 DE/NT (Smith)

Lokey is the odd man out, as they’d prefer to keep Magee

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

If They Cut Mike Cox

Then Lokey is probably staying because they apparently see him as a DT/FB and that frees a roster spot for another position. Even though Lokey isn’t much of a DL.

Of course, Alex Magee hasn’t proven to be much of a DL.

Moderator - Arrowhead Pride

by UCrawford on Aug 31, 2010 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

I can't see anyway Lokey doesn't make the team

Lokey is part of a much needed NT rotation

And just as UCrawford just stated, they can also use him at FB too, freeing up another roster spot.

If the Chiefs win on MNF, I'm not changing my underwear until they lose
"I'm not superstitious. I'm a little-stitious"-Michael Scott

by FalconMF27 on Aug 31, 2010 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

I dont' think Lokey is going to be used as a FB very often

that was probably just a preseason experiment.

I think they keep Cox and Castille.

Lokey is being given a long look in the preseason, but I’m not sure he’s ready to play NT.

they’ll rotate Edwards and Smith, IMHO

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 1:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed

Seems to me putting him in there at FB was an attemtp to find some way to justify keeping him. I think they like Lokey, but it will come down to Lokey or Smith and I’d give the edge to Smith.

by Chiefs4Life on Aug 31, 2010 4:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Smith will stay yes

because he has been lining up DE and NT
I think it comes down to Gales and Lokey and that is a pretty close battle.

The picture is a Chiefs pumpkin, yeah that is right a Chiefs pumpkin.

by jrcnc on Aug 31, 2010 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

it's a numbers game, then

again,

Jackson, Dorsey, Magee, Gilberry, Smith, Edwards… that’s 6

add in Lokey or Gales, now you’re at 7, and probably have to carry less LBs, which hurts ST and team speed…

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 4:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

then maybe it will be Smith surprise cut

or even Magee, who knows but it sure will be interesting to watch!

The picture is a Chiefs pumpkin, yeah that is right a Chiefs pumpkin.

by jrcnc on Aug 31, 2010 4:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

it will be interesting for sure

and they always seem to find a way to surprise me (and prove me wrong in my predictions)

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 5:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Don't both still qualify for the PS

I don’t know that anybody is beating down our doors for either Lokey or Gales, so they should be relatively safe if we put them on the PS. Even then, it comes down to numbers; so only one is likely to stay.

by Chiefs4Life on Sep 1, 2010 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

DaJuan Morgan is gone.

This is his third year, and he still can’t find playing time. That said, I think I would trust Morgan more than Washington if one of the starters got hurt, but I know Pioli isn’t going to get rid of a 4th rounder after one season.

I’d really like to see Dion Gales stay, at least on the practice squad. I like him. I think we’ll keep 6 defensive linemen—Dorsey Edwards Jackson Gilberry Smith Magee.

I think Cole is in trouble. That hold on the kickoff return was a killer. That’s something the coaches will remember.

by Vince D on Aug 31, 2010 1:08 PM CDT reply actions  

agreed on all counts

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

ILBs and S

Keep 4 ILB (DJ, Belcher, Mays, WIlliams)

Keep 4 S (Berry, McGraw, Lewis, Washington)

The other spots would be special teams guys, so it depends on whom they like in those roles… I’d be rooting for Cory Greenwood and Reshard Langford

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 1:11 PM CDT reply actions  

OLB needs to be in the mix

for whether or not we keep a 5th ILB. With Vrable’s ability to move inside they may decide to keep 5 OLB’s and 4 ILB’s. Vrable, Hali, Studebaker and Shefield are locks and they may want to keep Walters also.

by ICTChief on Aug 31, 2010 1:12 PM CDT reply actions  

good point

I think they keep all 5 OLBs, especially considering Vrabel does play inside on Nickel packages

I think Sheffield and Walters both make it (unless Sheffield is unable to play, and goes on IR)

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree on Shefield..

although I’m thinking he may on be put on PUP so they can re-evaluate him mid season.

by ICTChief on Aug 31, 2010 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

per recent conversations

they might not be able to do that

something about they have to be on PUP before the training camp starts

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

haha, good one NJ :)

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Actaully it'll be interesting if he does decide to sign his tender

It would put the Chiefs in a tough spot. If they release him he’ll be getting his way, and if they don’t he’s taking away a roster spot?

Predictions:
This year will be better

by jmcgoblue on Aug 31, 2010 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'll be surprised if he doesn't sign shortly after the roster is finalized

It’s the only leverage he has left, to try and force the Chief’s hands.

by dablueguy on Sep 1, 2010 10:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think the only way that Page signs

is if there’s a prior agreement to an immediate sign-and-trade scenario.

Other than that happening, I think Page sits until after the week 10 cutoff date.

Chiefs - back in the playoffs in 2011.

by TRSChief on Aug 31, 2010 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why wouldn't he just sign his tender and take the choice of getting $1.6m for being inactive

or being released & going to a team he wants to play for?

Predictions:
This year will be better

by jmcgoblue on Aug 31, 2010 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

other than the fact that he'd get fined every day he didn't show up for practice?

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

^^^^ this

Chiefs - back in the playoffs in 2011.

by TRSChief on Aug 31, 2010 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

agreed, TRS ... seems that's the most likely scenario

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
Come back, Jason!
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Aug 31, 2010 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think Corey Mays could be cut

he hasn’t been especially impressive in the preseason and I think Jovan Belcher should take over for him. Maybe leaves a spot for Greenwood or Herron to develop/play special teams. Just throwing it out therre

by ChiefMizzou09 on Aug 31, 2010 1:25 PM CDT reply actions  

interesting thought

I don’t think Herron has much upside, but Cory Greenwood very well might…

But, I think they like Mays well enough to keep him, and maybe give Greenwood a PS spot

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

agreed

I doubt Mays gets the boot for some reason. Greenwood with the position switch and all they are probably going to try to keep him on the PS.

The picture is a Chiefs pumpkin, yeah that is right a Chiefs pumpkin.

by jrcnc on Aug 31, 2010 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

I mean cory Greenwood, from Canada

not Bobby Greenwood, who now plays RT

I think Bobby gets cut outright.

Cory has some potential, and as people say, would go back to Canada instead of sitting on the PS

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

gotcha

I was actually talking about the Bobby, just didn’t think they would give up on RT help unless they snag someone else from the waiver wire.

The picture is a Chiefs pumpkin, yeah that is right a Chiefs pumpkin.

by jrcnc on Aug 31, 2010 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm still not sold

on Greenwood immediately heading back to Canada if he’s not on the 53-man roster. He would make more in Canada this year, but his chance of making an active roster next year or in year 3 means he’d make more money in the long run to stick around the NFL. I think he can become a very good LB, but it will take a year or two to develop him.

by Chiefs4Life on Aug 31, 2010 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think Mays is cut

Unless someone surprising shakes free from another team.

by bh13 on Aug 31, 2010 5:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think we should be penciling Lokey in at FB...

after his one play on the goal line. That could have easily been any other fattie lead blocking.

Politics aside, Obama would of better been served, buying 5 "new" football teams.

by HIV 2 Elway on Aug 31, 2010 1:33 PM CDT reply actions  

I still think he makes the team though

even if it isn’t as a FB.

The picture is a Chiefs pumpkin, yeah that is right a Chiefs pumpkin.

by jrcnc on Aug 31, 2010 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not sure...

I am rooting for the guy… BUT… if it comes down to him or Magee, as I kinda think it does…

do they like him enough to dump a 3rd round pick?

doubt it

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

which sucks

because if he has played better than Magee, shit can Magee. But everyone knows Im not to high on him anyways so Im pulling for Gales or Lokey.

The picture is a Chiefs pumpkin, yeah that is right a Chiefs pumpkin.

by jrcnc on Aug 31, 2010 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lokey and Gales

are both practice squad eligible Magee is not so, I think they will keep him and put either Lokey or Gales (or both) on the practice squad.

by ICTChief on Aug 31, 2010 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

interesting I didn't know those two were eligible

hopefully they pass through waivers.

The picture is a Chiefs pumpkin, yeah that is right a Chiefs pumpkin.

by jrcnc on Aug 31, 2010 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think they keep 7 D-linemen

Politics aside, Obama would of better been served, buying 5 "new" football teams.

by HIV 2 Elway on Aug 31, 2010 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jackson, Magee, Dorsey, Edwards, Gilberry, Smith AND Lokey?

that would probably leave them a little light on LBs, though…

the 53 man limit is pretty restrictive

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 1:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Gales > Lokey

Politics aside, Obama would of better been served, buying 5 "new" football teams.

by HIV 2 Elway on Aug 31, 2010 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lokey>Gales

The picture is a Chiefs pumpkin, yeah that is right a Chiefs pumpkin.

by jrcnc on Aug 31, 2010 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lokey>Gales = Magee

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Peter Griffen > Homer Simpson

Joe Theismann:"Nobody in football should be called a genius. A genius is a guy like Norman Einstein."

by THE_TRUTH on Aug 31, 2010 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

disagree on that

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Homer Simpson>Peter Griffen=Lisa Simpson>Meg Griffen + Stewie Griffen>Maggie Simpson

Solve for Stewie Griffen.

To make a bad day worse, spend it wishing for the impossible.

I've had the same dream every night this week. I think it means that the spring season flopped and my subconscious has gone into reruns.

by chiefsandcigars on Aug 31, 2010 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

+Beefcake

To make a bad day worse, spend it wishing for the impossible.

I've had the same dream every night this week. I think it means that the spring season flopped and my subconscious has gone into reruns.

by chiefsandcigars on Aug 31, 2010 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lokey>Gales>Greenwood>shake-weight>Magee

The picture is a Chiefs pumpkin, yeah that is right a Chiefs pumpkin.

by jrcnc on Aug 31, 2010 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rec'd for showing your work

Chiefs - back in the playoffs in 2011.

by TRSChief on Aug 31, 2010 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

agreed

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

One thing good about this thread

…it’s gotten to the point where we can’t decide who to cut to get to 53 players.

 I remember when we couldn’t decide “who was worse to cut” and get to 53.

I think this year it’s made it a bit more difficult to decide compared to the last few years.

Joe Theismann:"Nobody in football should be called a genius. A genius is a guy like Norman Einstein."

by THE_TRUTH on Aug 31, 2010 1:42 PM CDT reply actions   2 recs

absolutely

hopefully, it’s even harder next year

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Gales stays

He is better than Smith, Lokey, and Magee. Just watch the tapes. He is huge and can draw double teams. Magee doesnt draw doubles.

Gales has the favor of someone or he wouldnt still be here. He paid his dues on PS last year. He is one of the 53!

"One of the teams asked me a running back question," McCluster said. "They said when you have the ball, do you focus on the guy who's in front of you or the next guy.

"I told them 99% of the time, I'm going to make that first guy miss. Then, I'm onto the next."

by Matt_Grbac on Aug 31, 2010 6:07 PM CDT reply actions  

I love your loyalty, Matty

I’d say Magee/Lokey getting cut would be the most likely scenario that would result in Gales on the 53.

Smith seemed to draw double teams as well, and can play NT or DE, so I think he makes it for sure

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 6:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sweet...glad you got my back Stag!

Magee and Lokey need more seasoning….IMO

Smith and Gales have big bodies to eat up Olinemen for lunch…..plus they can play any position of the front 3…..great versatility.

"One of the teams asked me a running back question," McCluster said. "They said when you have the ball, do you focus on the guy who's in front of you or the next guy.

"I told them 99% of the time, I'm going to make that first guy miss. Then, I'm onto the next."

by Matt_Grbac on Aug 31, 2010 6:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

were you just giddy when Gales got that sack?

he really showed some fire and heart there

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 6:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

I loved his celebration

I love seeing the excitement come out of players, especially guys fighting for a job.

by bh13 on Aug 31, 2010 6:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

I haven't watched him enough to have much of an opinion on him to be honest

I think it will come down to whether he’s eligible for the practice squad or not. If he is, I could see them going with Magee/Lokey to start the year, then bring him up if one of them doesn’t play well/gets hurt.

by bh13 on Aug 31, 2010 6:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think Lokey could be eli
http://www.arrowheadpride.com/2010/8/24/1648313/nfl-practice-squad-explained-rules

Have no prior Accrued Seasons in the NFL (An accrued season is six or more games on the active roster);
Have one prior Accrued Season in which the player was on the 45-man active roster for no more than 8 games; and,
Have been on the practice squad with a particular team no more than 2 prior seasons unless the team never had their active roster go below 53 players during the two years the player served on the practice squad. If that is the case, the player is eligible for a third practice squad season.

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 6:39 PM CDT reply actions  

List of Chiefs eligible for the practice squad (not including ones that obviously make the 53)
Bates, Jackie CB
Langford, Reshard S
Price, Ricky S

Russell, John LB
Walters, Pierre LB

Gales, Dion DE/NT

Harris, Darryl LT
Greenwood, Bobby RT
Brown, Colin RT

Slate, Cody TE

Palko, Tyler QB
Stull, Bill QB

Williams, Javarris RB
Moore, Kestahn RB

Tucker, Verran WR


Somebody check my homework, did I miss anyone?

by Aesthetist on Aug 24, 2010 4:27 PM CDT reply actions

You can add
Cory Greenwood and Justin Cole to that list.

by ICTChief on Aug 24, 2010 4:36 PM CDT up reply actions

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 6:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

I guess it depends on how they decide the two seasons part
Have been on the practice squad with a particular team no more than 2 prior seasons

http://www.kcchiefs.com/team/roster/Derek-Lokey/031dc929-cd84-404e-bc9d-ce801477106f

Saw action in two games in 2009 after spending three weeks on the club’s practice squad … Former rookie free agent spent the first 15 weeks of the 2008 season on the club’s practice squad before being promoted to the 53-man active roster for the final two games of the year

If just being on the practice squad at all is the determining factor, Lokey’s not eligible. If they have to be on the PS for a certain number of weeks for it to count, it’s possible since he only spent 3 weeks there last year.

by bh13 on Aug 31, 2010 6:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

interesting

I would guess Lokey isn’t eligible, but we’ll see

this should be the most exciting Chiefs team in years! Most major needs filled with playmakers, and the league's best coaching staff... 10-6 a possibility?

by stagdsp on Aug 31, 2010 7:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog! Follow us on Facebook and on Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Calabaloo_small
Reviewing AP's Predictions For The Chiefs 2011 Season
Small
Some clarity on Peyton's injury
Crennelgatoradebathposterizedrough_small
Brian Daboll: Another Perspective
Dxmcc_copy_small
Why Drafting Robert Griffin Is Not Optional For The Kansas City Chiefs

Recent FanPosts

Small
Expectations for SB under Cassel/Orton
Winning_me_small
Chief Concern
Small
Trade Scenario with DT Glenn Dorsey
Nfl_u_okoye_200_small
Kansas City=Elite Defense?
Supernova1007_small
Triplettes
Dbs_oak_991_10_23_11_small
What Stanford Routt-Chiefs Visit Means
Small
What if.........
Small
Whats Your Opinion ?
Small
Former Players

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

23247_617116905_1805_n_small Chris Thorman

Headshot_small Joel Thorman

Editors

Matt_ssv_pic_small_small Matt Conner

Stag_20silhouette_small stagdsp

288-chiefstexans0944_sp_8-15-09_jfs woodman212

Lips-rhps_small upamtn

Contributors

Small Jon Yoon

Kc_ny_small NJ Chiefs Fan

Phoenix_by_melen_small KaloPhoenix

N1358340181_30185582_5800_small Flowers24

Dirkness_small HisDirkness

Cassel_small Steve_in_RI