How Will The Kansas City Chiefs Handle Preseason Injuries?
Every team is taking its licks at this point in the preseason. Even some of Kansas City's fiercest rivals have found their own hearts beating fast and fingers crossed in the hopes that the injuries before them aren't that serious. With Denver, losing their best pass rusher (by far) in Elvis Dumervil looks like it will hurt them nearly all of 2010. For the Raiders, that feeling came swiftly last night as Jason Campbell bit the dust on a sack by 49ers linebacker Travis LaBoy.
But what about the Chiefs? At this point, how should the injuries suffered thus far affect the Chiefs coming into the regular season. It's impossible to fully know, given the mysterious nature of the severity of some (and the Chiefs' penchant for holding the cards close to the vest). But it doesn't hurt to try, right?
Maurice Leggett, DB
The hit was brutal in the fourth quarter of the Tampa Bay preseason game. For those who missed it, the collision with the Bucs' running back Kareem Huggins left Leggett requiring a stretcher to be carted off of the field. The team watched in horror as their teammate seemed to suffered what most NFL players fear the most -- some sort of spinal injury. The image, suffice to say, was difficult to watch.
The Chiefs drafted well to add to their defensive backfield this offseason and even having a veteran like Travis Daniels around can't hurt either. With rookies like Javier Arenas and Kendrick Lewis around, they might find a bit more playing time outside of special teams than they originally thought.
Chiefs Ability to Handle: A-
Cameron Sheffield, LB
After the helmet-to-helmet hit on Mike Bell, the Eagles running back, Sheffield appeared to have suffered the same fate as Maurice Leggett the previous week. Another Chiefs defensive player appeared to have suffered a major injury and the sense of deja vu originally had some fans feeling if some voodoo doll had been placed on the Chiefs defensive unit. However, the early news is positive as Sheffield was released from the hospital and Adam Schefter reports that he has movement in all his extremities.
That's great news for Sheffield and also what matters most. However, it still begs the question of what the Chiefs can expect on the field from Sheffield, if anything. The Chiefs maintained their linebacking corps from the previous season for the most part and Sheffield was the only new addition to a group that most identified as a key area of need going into the offseason. Thus, it's easy to see Sheffield's injury as a greater one -- even concerning Sheffield's learning curve -- as more difficult to take than Leggett.
While Sheffield might not have been on the field an incredible amount this season, it seemed he was bound to get some reps rotating in for some weathered veterans. Some had hopes that Sheffield could become a solid pass rushing prospect from the outside. For now, the Chiefs will have to wait and hope that others like Andy Studebaker can fill that void since the Chiefs didn't add much of anything else.
Chiefs Ability to Handle: B
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I might be inclined to make both those "grades" the same (B) ... if MoLeggs is gone any length of time the Secondary is definitely weakened
… I could see Studie picking up any slack for Sheff, and remember too Sheff is a rookie so I’d imagine less is expected of him this year
overall, though, my only real concern is the health and welfare of those two guys … I hope they both come back to the field soon, but if not it would be understandable … can be a brutal game out there
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
Come back, Jason!
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
by upamtn on Aug 29, 2010 12:14 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Sorry~
Although I am a fan of the chiefs~ and I support every player~ I cannot say that if MOLEGGS was gone for any length it would weaken our secondary! WHY??? Because I am NOT convinced that he is a player of that caliber that IT WOULD HURT us if he went down for a long time!
I REMEMBER LAST YEAR and WAS HOPING to SEE HIM PROVE ME WRONG, IM STILL HOPING to get that chance for him! GOD BLESS YA MOLEGGS~ I hope you prove me wrong!@
FIRST DOWN *DEXTER* on a desp. needed kansas city chiefs FIRST DOWN!
TY *BERRY* MUCH ill say as Berry Lays the wood on V. Jackson on MNF
by Kansan_Chief on Aug 29, 2010 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions
depth ... always need depth, especially a position where we have (most likely) 2 rookie starters
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
Come back, Jason!
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
yeah I sort of thought leggs would be cut in favor of d-wash getting more time to play both positions
Team Pioli/Haley. Decade of the Chiefs.
Team Colquitt
I remember William Bartee
being taken off the field on a cart in a similar fashion (in Denver if I remember correctly). Two weeks later he was playing again. I never want to assume or speculate on these types of things, but the memory of Bartee’s fast recovery gives me hope that these guys can do the same.
From just a gameplay standpoint, I'd be more worried about Leggett missing time.
Flowers and/or Carr are bound to miss a few plays some time or other, and Leggett is our backup corner. Arenas might get listed at #3 and he might shape up into a decent nickel, but he ain’t ready to handle the outside yet by a long shot. Leggett’s better than anybody else we have at the #1 and #2 CB spots except for Flowers and Carr.
Sheffield I’m looking forward to seeing play, but if it’s not a major injury, then he can use his time out of the game to practice some NFL pass rushing and get NFL strong. That could be real helpful for a small-school guy.
The path to Victory is made of losers.
I guess in your eyes Donald Washington
is dog crap. OHHHH you forgot about him. The Chiefs will be fine without Leggett.
by popparuss581 on Aug 29, 2010 10:59 PM CDT up reply actions
Nope, not dog crap,
just not quite as good as Leggett. The team isn’t divided into “starters” and “dog crap,” ya know. Plus, Washington has been playing safety (see, I do remember him). I think that’s what Matt overlooked a little when he talked about depth in the secondary. We are deep at some secondary positions, but not really at outside CB.
The path to Victory is made of losers.
Leggett would be the 1st sub CB, Daniels the 2nd, Arenas the 3rd, maybe even the 4th behind D-wash, IMO if Carr or Flowers were hurt. Arenas is the #1 nickle back, and the positions are pretty different in Pioli and Haley’s mind.
Yeah, that's how I see it.
I like Daniels, he makes plays, but I don’t know how he’d hold up for a whole game once receivers get used to him.
The path to Victory is made of losers.

by 


























