Ranking the AFC West Running Backs
Bill Williamson has put up his ratings of RB's in the AFC West over at espn.com. Of course Charles ranking isn't that much of a surprise and we know Jones can carry the ball. However, it really emphasizes how dangerous our rushing attack will be next year, especially when McCluster joins them both on the field.
about 2 years ago
Jawookie
6 comments
1 recs |
Comments
Great article from a Chief's fan Point-of-view and I completely agree on Charles and
Jones. Then add McCluster, maybe best group in NFL.
its not fair
the way they can use all those backs for runs and passes which will free up bowe chambers and our TE to go to work the possiblities are endless !
What I love about this ranking
Is other then the clueless Raider fan who actually think Bush stands a chance at being the best RB in the division, there is no one else arguing about our backs being ranker #1 and #2.
"Success is never ending, failure is never final."
I'm a fan of Bush too
don’t know about rankings, but I think Bush has the possibility of being a 1500 yard back. Adding a legitimate QB doesn’t hurt either.
The Chiefs will finish .500 or better in 2010.



























