Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: Coverage of the 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing'

Chiefs GM Scott Pioli's Seven Draft Day Criteria

From the FanPosts. Bumped up the time to now. -Chris

Cd1fee6fa5c3deb5d1c6e9_large_medium

Kansas City Chiefs GM Scott Pioli (via Truveo.com)

It seems to me that many of us on AP have not picked up on our Genius GM's draft philosophy.

Arguments abound in our posts and comments as to why we would like this player or that player at a certain pick, mostly having to do with our first three picks. Many of our arguments would be moot if we would simply remind ourselves of Pioli's draft philosophy.

I think we are kidding ourselves though if we think, with our thousands of different opinions and beliefs, that we can ever agree on who the pick might be and actually get it right very often. After all, Pioli, the coaches and the scouts argue all the time about which players will be better for the team before they finally come to settle on which names go where on their draft board. 

From a Pre-Draft Q & A session with Kansas City Chiefs GM Pioli and Coach Haley on April 16, 2009, I have concluded that Mr. Pioli uses seven key criteria when choosing his draft picks

Understand that some of Pioli's answers may be a bit cloudy, as we know he is very secretive about his future picks and doesn't want to let any cats out of his bag. However, "The Don" (I use that term affectionately) Pioli clearly reveals his philosophy of who will be his choice at a given spot in the draft.

Enjoy...(Interview content via the Mothership)

Star-divide

1. Pioli will draft players who are intelligent, have a strong work ethic and have healthy work habits. In other words, they are players who live, eat, breathe, sleep, and die football 24-7.

One question in the interview dealt with how prepared they felt for the '09 draft and part of Pioli's answer I think is helpful in terms of understanding his initial thought process. He said that initially it's important to understand who Todd Haley is as head coach and the kind of players that fit his coaching style. Understanding...

What type of players (Coach Haley) needs and wants means having a lot of common values not only in performance but in makeup, because the most important part is the intelligence, work ethic and work habits (of the player).

2. Pioli will draft players who fit subjectively within "the right 53" mold. 

"Do you still stand by your statement that the right 53 players doesn't necessarily mean the most athletic 53 players?" To this Pioli responded:

The best 53 players don’t necessarily mean the most skilled, the most athletic or the most talented. I think it is something we are trying to address this off-season in terms of veteran players that we brought in who are proven winners, guys that we know have a certain work ethic and a certain makeup. When we make decisions on players, whether it is in the draft, free-agency or trades, however we acquire players, we want to get the right players that fit Todd’s leadership style and our collective belief in work ethic and the overall makeup of the players. 

3. Pioli will draft players who meet the criteria: a) they have the ability to perform at a high level and b) they play a position of deepest need on the team.

"Do you draft players based upon ability or team need?" To which Pioli responded:

I have always felt that it is a combination of those two things. Some teams do things based purely on need, other teams do it based on what they think is the best player available. I think it is a combination of those two things. You have to take into account who’s the best player available and also what your needs are. I’ll go back to a situation years ago: on our roster we had a certain position that we had a large number of players and we kept passing a player up that we felt was the best player available. We also felt we had a strong number of players at that particular position but there comes a point in time where you have to mesh those two things together and do a combination of best player and needs.

4. Sometimes Pioli picks a player who has great ability or presents a great value to the team even if he is not in a position of greatest need.

Does Pioli select on need or BPA (depending upon) if he picks early or late?

It’s weighted differently at whatever point in time you’re making a pick. You have to take into account what your needs are on the team but you can’t ignore...a certain player who’s a tremendous value or has tremendous ability. So, whether it’s the third pick or the 23rd pick or the 33rd pick you need to take both things into account.

5. Players who score high in the "intangibles" trump guys who simply score well in combine events or at their pro days.

On the question of how valuable the "intangibles" are when making his selection...

That’s why we don’t allow the scouts to call them intangibles because things like leadership, things like toughness, things that are referred to as intangibles are very, very tangible elements of who the player is and who the person is. These guys are not robots and not just height, weight, speed.

6. Pioli always keeps an open mind when offers to trade picks arise, but he doesn't jump at every opportunity just because it presents itself. He listens to trade offers only if it provides him the opportunity to grab a specific player that he wants, but wouldn't be able to pick otherwise. He exercises patience when offers arise.

How willing is Pioli to trade a pick?

Tell me, who’s on the board? I don’t know who is or who’s not. I don’t know who wants someone (and would) make an offer. Here’s what I know: when it’s our turn to pick, whenever that is, we’re going to know who we’re picking and we’re going to be ready. If there is an opportunity to make a trade we’ll listen. That’s an important thing. You have to take your time, be patient, not be reactive (but) think things through. (You don't think about what's) the best decision at that second, but long-term...Teams don’t necessarily just trade picks. They trade picks to get to players. That’s what I think is missed sometimes. Trades are made so teams can get to specific players.

7. Pioli doesn't put all his apples in his Draft basket. He knows that good players become available to him through various means.

On drafting good pass rushers in later rounds or finding them in FA:

We’re trying not to marry ourselves to one specific way. If you commit yourself mentally to not knowing all the vehicles and all the potential opportunities you may be missing something. You never know what the opportunities might be, what free agency might be from year to year. You never know who’s going to be cut and put out on the street. You might have an opportunity there. There’s opportunity everywhere.

How does this venture into the mind of an NFL Draft genius help you as you think about who the Chiefs might select on NFL Draft Weekend?

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.

Comment 66 comments  |  15 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Nicely put

How can you not trust this guy? Calm, Cool, and collected

We shouldn't be here. I can't be within 50 feet of a school......or a chucky cheese.

by BJ Kissel on Apr 3, 2010 1:22 AM CDT reply actions  

Yep. I still can't believe we got him...simply amazing.

Official Member: Eric Berry Fan Club
Tweet me @GiftNate
N. Gift

by giftedchiefsfan on Apr 3, 2010 1:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think he came to the Chiefs...

Because we had great ownership, and he saw a chance to turn around a franchise in the wrong direction, and show to people he can be one of the best GMs in the league. Whatever, I’m glad he’s here. :)

True Quotes:
"Charles In Charge"
"Defense Wins Championships"
"The Battle is Won and Lost in the Trenches"

With the 5th overall pick in the 2010 NFL Draft, the Kansas City Chiefs select, Rolando McClain, ILB, Alabama.

*Member of the unknown draft Rolando McClain fan club*

by KC Nate on Apr 3, 2010 1:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

clark should get a lot of credit, he sold him on us

and then gave him the keys

We shouldn't be here. I can't be within 50 feet of a school......or a chucky cheese.

by BJ Kissel on Apr 3, 2010 1:37 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

yea that too of course

True Quotes:
"Charles In Charge"
"Defense Wins Championships"
"The Battle is Won and Lost in the Trenches"

With the 5th overall pick in the 2010 NFL Draft, the Kansas City Chiefs select, Rolando McClain, ILB, Alabama.

*Member of the unknown draft Rolando McClain fan club*

by KC Nate on Apr 3, 2010 1:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

True,

But it wasn’t all about salary increases and promotions. Teams had been trying to steal Pioli away from the Pats for several years. There was something about the Chiefs that Pioli must have really liked and whatever that is, I like it too.

Don't blame me, I voted for content of character.

by paratrooper on Apr 3, 2010 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yup,

I’m looking forward to the future with Pioli in charge.

Do you know its been 16 years since we won our last playoff game?

Opinions are like A--holes, everyones got one.

by aPacificChief on Apr 3, 2010 6:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Excellent post and rec

I see a need picker and well thought out planner.
We have no idea on the reach aspect but you only usually get one player in 32 picks so I guess it is possible He would reach 30 spots if he can’t trade down or up if the need arises. Pioli will trade picks IMO

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Apr 3, 2010 1:33 AM CDT reply actions  

Honestly I hope the opportunity comes our way to trade down

(hope my fellow Kool-Aide drinkers don’t see that…I’ll be banished from the club) those extra picks will be invaluable to us this year.

Official Member: Eric Berry Fan Club
Tweet me @GiftNate
N. Gift

by giftedchiefsfan on Apr 3, 2010 2:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hope your right, I'd love that more than the actual selection....no I'm just kidding!

But I would be excited with the trade down.

Depending on who falls to us Cleveland, Seattle, Jacksonville, & San Francisco can make this draft quite interesting.

Opinions are like A--holes, everyones got one.

by aPacificChief on Apr 3, 2010 7:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yep Steve i believe your right.

But i can tell you this I’m already happy with what he has done right now, and that’s before we draft, this team in already heading towards a Super-Bowl win IMO.

by CPT.Caveman on Apr 3, 2010 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Cavey, I think most of us are happy so far ... mainly because he seems be doing something rather than nothing

unlike a year ago when he pretty much did nothing because HIS scouts weren’t in place in all the departments, so instead of listening to Herm’s guys 9who actually did have a clue) he just … well, not sure what he did up to draft day, but it wasn’t a lot (IMNSHO)

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Apr 3, 2010 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

He did seem lost. But,

I’m thinking that it wasn’t so much mistrust of Herm’s college scouts. I think he didn’t feel like he had enough personal knowledge of the Chiefs roster to trust himself to draft need. And he wasn’t gonna trust guys on the inside of a bad team to tell him what the needs were… That could be why he went with such obvious 3-4 guys for the first two picks, and a total BPA type pick in the fourth. I think this year we’ll see picks that fit more neatly into the holes in the roster.

The path to Victory is made of losers.

by Brsrkr on Apr 4, 2010 12:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

Great post

When I look at the points you’ve presented, especially the first one, I can’t help but think Rolando McClain will be our pick. Everything I’ve heard about him shows that he fits the right 53 mold perfectly and he seems to have the qualities Pioli wants. But whatever does happen, it’s nice to know that we’re in good hands.

Official Member of the Draft Chuck Berry Fanclub

"What the world needs is more geniuses with humility, there are so few of us left."

by Aperture on Apr 3, 2010 1:43 AM CDT reply actions  

I think I would only be disappointed with a LT at #5

I think Mr Pioli knows this and doesn’t want to disappoint me…lol

Official Member: Eric Berry Fan Club
Tweet me @GiftNate
N. Gift

by giftedchiefsfan on Apr 3, 2010 2:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

The only LT I would want would be Okung, and even then I wouldn't be too crazy about it

Bulaga and the rest would all probably be mid to late first round talent in any other draft

Official Member of the Draft Chuck Berry Fanclub

"What the world needs is more geniuses with humility, there are so few of us left."

by Aperture on Apr 3, 2010 2:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

This is a great post

Nice work.

Founded Arrowhead Pride 7/26/2006

Please read our community rules, netiquette rules and our technical overview before commenting.

by Chris Thorman on Apr 3, 2010 7:49 AM CDT reply actions  

Still up? you in India again?

Sucks being over here in the Pacific, nobody still awake.

Opinions are like A--holes, everyones got one.

by aPacificChief on Apr 3, 2010 7:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Nah

Woke up about 6:30 this morning. Took the dog, started laundry…Now I’m drinking coffee on the couch. Great morning :)

What time is it there?

Founded Arrowhead Pride 7/26/2006

Please read our community rules, netiquette rules and our technical overview before commenting.

by Chris Thorman on Apr 3, 2010 7:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hey Happy Easter....its 11 pm Saturday evening

The kicking and screaming are in bed fast asleep. Just the wife and I getting ready for Easter sunday.

Opinions are like A--holes, everyones got one.

by aPacificChief on Apr 3, 2010 8:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

You the man Chris

It’s six 6:00 in the morning here in Oregon and all I plan to get done is some quality AP time

by tdbowe on Apr 3, 2010 8:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Mrs. Arrowhead Pride has been taken care of a lot of house work as of late

It’s the least I can do.

Founded Arrowhead Pride 7/26/2006

Please read our community rules, netiquette rules and our technical overview before commenting.

by Chris Thorman on Apr 3, 2010 8:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Front page love! Congrats Gifted!

Nice write up!

Opinions are like A--holes, everyones got one.

by aPacificChief on Apr 3, 2010 7:50 AM CDT reply actions  

*bows*

Official Member: Eric Berry Fan Club
Tweet me @GiftNate
N. Gift

by giftedchiefsfan on Apr 5, 2010 9:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

This article says

McClain and Berry all the way. To me, those 2 players fit all the above.

by Larryemcdaniel on Apr 3, 2010 8:50 AM CDT reply actions  

If we were to trade down

it would probably be because Clausen is still on the board. I’m thinking we could trade with Cleveland, Buffalo, Jacksonville, etc. since they’ll be afraid Seattle will snatch Clausen at 6. We could get an extra 3rd (or possibly 2nd if we play enough hardball) and trade down just a few picks.

At this position, I’d be delighted to take Bulaga or McClain (as opposed to distraught to take them at 5). Do you all agree? How plausible is this?

by Chief TigerGator on Apr 3, 2010 9:41 AM CDT reply actions  

Please no Bulaga

I’m becoming militantly against any LT idea in 1st Rd. I think I’ll lose it if they pick one. We don’t need one. Read No. 3 and 4 again.

No 3: LT is not an area of deep need.
No 4: None of the LTs available are such an amazing talent OR value to trump No 3.

New body. Same soul.

by kabrink on Apr 3, 2010 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree 100%

"It doesn't matter what you do in Life only that you do it the best you can. "

by sgthall on Apr 3, 2010 5:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

A dominant OL is a dominant OL.

On a team with KC’s salary situation, the reach is of less importance than is the significant upgrade to the position group, as a whole, and Bulaga might just be seen as the greatest upgrade to the group as a whole. Something folks may overlook is the flexibility a Bulaga would give them up front.

This is NOT saying I’m displeased with Albert at ALL. I just think that a dominant RT with proven LT abilities puts to rest (m)any questions about the position group.

I’m not saying I’m stuck on Bulaga, either. When you talk about a position GROUP needing help, it doesn’t automatically mean you have to take the BPA at PON, either. As Kabrink says, below, LT in the 1st round this year is something I’m not very high on. I’m not “militant” about it, though, because I believe a smart system approach will defy most folks’ understanding of the optimal at specific points, but still be the surest path to fielding a contending TEAM.

Most mocks I see, folks are always looking for the highest probability of getting a starter with each and every pick, and are dismissive of redundant picks or players with less flash than the players THEY love. But most of those mocks end up being dependent on most or ALL the picks panning out exactly as intended (a house of cards), and even 80% probability of success at every point leaves you at a mere (.8)(.8)(.8) = 51.2% after 3 picks and 40.96% after 4 picks. So you’re putting together a mock that’s a coin flip or worse in terms of achieving the kind of progress you want to be making.

by hmills110 on Apr 3, 2010 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Damn Math :)

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Apr 3, 2010 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

you KNOW he's right, though

morning, Steve

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Apr 3, 2010 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just the result was not what I was hoping for :)

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Apr 3, 2010 3:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

agreed

and .8 for some of those 3rd or 4th round picks is kinda high

Member of the Eric Berry Fan Club
Snap the fucking ball Brodie!

by jakethesnake27 on Apr 3, 2010 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's why I like "great IQ (and intangibles), good athlete" LB picks further down.

Boosts your probability of getting somebody EFFECTIVE from a team play standpoint with that pick, whereas nothing less than a GREAT athlete can get it done man-on-man on the edge or blocking on the edge on the other side of the ball. So I’d be accused of reaching all the time, trying to get the BEST CBs, WRs, OTs, and DE/OLBs, and passing over the highly touted RBs, QBs, LBs…

by hmills110 on Apr 3, 2010 3:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

agree with you mostly

My only disagreement with you in our posts above is simply the isolated case of this year’s No 5 pick. I just don’t think it makes sense to pick a LT with that pick this year. We already have a new Rd 1 guy at LT. I realize you are saying Baluga can be depth or RT but that undermines the value argument. I still think we can get depth later and I know you also agree with that.

New body. Same soul.

by kabrink on Apr 3, 2010 3:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

I've argued against the T pick with our #5, as well.

But I can see arguments for it, from a system standpoint, and a slightly different definition of “value,” which weights versatility higher. Bulaga would be a monster RT or RG, and would allow the Chiefs to maybe carry more DBs or WRs or LBs or ??? while THOSE position groups are being sorted out. But as a general principle, top 5 picks are for clear-cut franchise LTs, of which there might be NONE in this draft.

Bulaga would be a reach, but if that reach stays healthy and plays lights-out wherever he’s playing, that lays a foundation for focusing the microscope on other position groups.

Personally, I see early 2nd as likely to produce a lineman with all the measurables, good intangibles, and good feet. As in another thread, someone like Maurkice Pouncey would give KC a C for the future AND be able to come right in and play RG.

Blah blah blah. Personally, I feel that Pioli can probably find group upgrade on OL and DL by waiting until later, depending on how the other teams make their selections. This is another layer of the Pioli onion. He has his board AND he’s looking where others are likely to go, and he reacts to where they’ve gone, for instance, keeping a close eye on what the teams ahead are doing in the draft, and where they are most likely to be looking to scrape the barrel on the waiver wire – and more importantly, where they are NOT going to be active on the wire, so he’ll have his pick of the also-rans, where they’re likely to do the most good for his team.

Main reason I’d be OK with Bulaga, even as a reach, though, is my sense of the startiing quality of our tackles, and the depth behind them. I’m more convinced that Albert will get it done than many are, but Chiefs look paper-thin behind O’Callaghan and him, and I’m totally OK with a 1st-rounder at least pushing them.

by hmills110 on Apr 4, 2010 8:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Mills I agree

Yet Pioli has looked at
Okung
Bulaga
Iupati
Pouncey

Saffold
Ducasse

Seems he might but not that he would. I see some serious line talent sitting out there in RFA’s we could get or maybe Pioli sees a RT will get waived.

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Apr 4, 2010 9:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

the Ravens Gaither seems a no-brainer

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Apr 4, 2010 9:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

You're being unfair to the mocks.

They’re limited to one pick (except for the ones that ramble), so of course they’re going to list their most preferred player. You don’t PLAN to draft the second or third best guy that you think might be available, that’s like giving up. Mocks are about HOPE, man! Why are you killing my hope, man?!

Actually, you’re talking about a big board instead of a mock. On the big board in my head, there are about a half dozen players in front of a right tackle.

The path to Victory is made of losers.

by Brsrkr on Apr 4, 2010 12:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

I like McClain or Berry, but none of those criteria mentioned anything about not taking a specific position with a top 5 pick.

That being said, I think that McClain is our pick if we can’t trade down. Actually, I really hope we do trade down and still get him.

by Reno_Chief on Apr 3, 2010 10:26 AM CDT reply actions  

Why didn't Pioli apply those ideas in last year's draft?

The philosophy sounds right, but it must be applied

I expect Pioli will do much better this year now that he knows the team better

With 3 picks in the top 50 and plenty of needs and depth at those positions, I expect things to go well

The input of Romeo and Charlie will also help

He’s always open. He catches a lot of balls. He’s un-guardable, no matter how old he is

by WarWolf on Apr 3, 2010 12:22 PM CDT reply actions  

He absolutely did. Best player available at an extreme position of need. That was Tyson Jackson. He was, BY FAR, the best player at 5 Tech DE and we had Zero guys at that position. Curry was next on the list, but it was questionable whether he was a 3-4 LB, and we had options at 3-4 ILB.

by dablueguy on Apr 3, 2010 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

a post a few weeks ago by Jon Yoon stated that Pioli apparantly didn't trust or bother listening to the "leftover" scouts from Herm's regime

which is a shame, really … he might have gotten some very good advice had he done so

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Apr 3, 2010 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Pioli should listen to guys he’s familiar with and trusts.

by dablueguy on Apr 3, 2010 12:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

We’re trying not to marry ourselves to one specific way. If you commit yourself mentally to not knowing all the vehicles and all the potential opportunities you may be missing something. You never know what the opportunities might be, what free agency might be from year to year. You never know who’s going to be cut and put out on the street. You might have an opportunity there. There’s opportunity everywhere.

Recall how Pioli was fairly passive on OL and WR while other teams were very aggressive at those groups in the early rounds. As I’ve said, before, the waiver wire was where he picked up Chambers and Lance Long, plus he spent a 6th-rounder, as it turned out, to get Alleman and Ndukwe, a pair of pretty darn good, field-tested interior linemen.

The best generals are strong where the opponent is weak, and avoid battle where the opponent is weak. Being where the other teams are NOT is a great system approach to obtaining the best values. This approach doesn’t produce a huge number of big splashes, but somehow, invisibly, the team is better overall than a more direct, head-to-head approach (that makes more sense to those who judge by superficial appearances) will be.

by hmills110 on Apr 3, 2010 1:11 PM CDT reply actions  

He also brought in Lelie, Toomer, Engram, Wade, ...

Did these pan out? No. But the point is, Pioli gave himself numerous inexpensive opportunities to get ALL of them in for a look. If any DID pan out, what a coup! When they didn’t, it didn’t set back the entire organization.

by hmills110 on Apr 3, 2010 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

agreed

simply blows me away how Pioli has built improvement into this team in so many ways and yet we still have the lowest payroll in the NFL. Amazing…simply amazing.

Official Member: Eric Berry Fan Club
Tweet me @GiftNate
N. Gift

by giftedchiefsfan on Apr 5, 2010 9:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

agreed, mills ... Pioli is NOT just all about BPA, something too many seem to think is the case

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Apr 3, 2010 1:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sun Tsu was a Sissy

… a true warrior would dive right in, damn the torpedos and full speed ahead blah blah blah

… after stocking up on necessities such as Jack Daniels, Guinness, chips, dip …

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Apr 3, 2010 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

New body. Same soul.

by kabrink on Apr 3, 2010 3:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

well done, kabrink

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Apr 3, 2010 4:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Or like the Famous Union General Joe Hooker

who tended to bring more important things along

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Apr 3, 2010 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

aye, you catch on fast

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Apr 3, 2010 4:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

I want

A “Stonewall” front 3 Defensive Line

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Apr 3, 2010 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

thank you, Gen Jackson

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Apr 3, 2010 5:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

What about Positional Value...

in the 1st round, specifically in the top 5? There is simply no way Pioli drafts an ILB or S with the 5th pick. He is going to go OT or NT. My guess is Dan Williams.

Call me Red or IBR for short

by I_Bleed_Red. on Apr 3, 2010 2:11 PM CDT reply actions  

under number 3 there

he was talking about Tom Brady. I saw an interview he did one time and he said that same thing but included his name

by RamX21 on Apr 3, 2010 2:18 PM CDT reply actions  

I won't be upset

If we draft McClain. But Berry has to be the guy. After reading this post, it all points towards Berry being the man for the Chiefs.

"The greater the struggle, the more glorious the triumph"

Eric Berry counted to infinity -- twice.

by SwimCoach on Apr 5, 2010 9:07 AM CDT reply actions  

I sure would like to think so...McClain does fit too I'll have to admit.

BTW…can we get 2 more recs plz? Need to keep this post on Front Page don’t you guys think?

Official Member: Eric Berry Fan Club
Tweet me @GiftNate
N. Gift

by giftedchiefsfan on Apr 5, 2010 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

Great Post! Recommended

I was a fan of Pioli before he came to KC. Now, I’m an even bigger fan. Building a winning team takes time and patience and Pioli knows what it takes to build a consistent winner. His picks are rarely the “sexy” picks but no one can argue that New England has been a consistent winner for the past decade. A lot of folks questioned the TJ pick at number 3. His numbers aren’t staggering but if you compare his stats to those of Vince Wilfolk (21st pick 2004), who many would argue is a pretty darn good foundation of the Patriot success, TJ’s first year was pretty consistent with that of Wilfolk.

Next weekend is going to be exciting to say the least and, unless we pick Tebow with #5, I can’t say I’m going to complain with the name announced by Mr. Goodell come selection time for the Chiefs!

Just keep matriculatin' the ball down the field, boys.

by KCnDC on Apr 13, 2010 11:03 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog! Follow us on Facebook and on Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Chiefs OTA's: Some Real Football News
Dscn3246_3_small
Worst Case Scenario
Lips-rhps_small
Translating Coachspeak (Humor & Satire)

Recent FanPosts

Supernova1007_small
What Does it Take?
Ford-mustang-gt-2011-wallpaper-02_small
Hope
New_kc_helm_small
Scott Pioli: Genuine Mastermind Part 1 - Quarterbacks
Dirtyhippy_small
The Epic Battle of Pittsburgh(Game 9 preview)
Spit_small
A Unique Look At Elite QB's and Ricky Stanzi
309look_small
Cassel, can the chiefs get a ring on his back?
Small
Trade McCluster...
Supernova1007_small
A New 3-4 team in the NFL
Supernova1007_small
Fashionistas

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Ct_fb_small Chris Thorman

Headshot_small Joel Thorman

Editors

288-chiefstexans0944_sp_8-15-09_jfs woodman212

Matt_ssv_pic_small_small Matt Conner

Stag_20silhouette_small stagdsp

Lips-rhps_small upamtn

Contributors

Kc_ny_small NJ Chiefs Fan

Phoenix_by_melen_small KaloPhoenix

N1358340181_30185582_5800_small Flowers24

Small Jon Yoon

Dirkness_small HisDirkness

Dscn3246_3_small MNchiefsfan

Cassel_small Steve_in_RI