Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: More Televised Winter Baseball, Please

Conflicting Details On Chris Chambers' Contract With The Chiefs

ESPN's Adam Schefter reported today the Kansas City Chiefs had agreed to terms with WR Chris Chambers. The details, according to Schefter, were three years with a total value of $15 million.

NFL Network's Michael Lombardi has some slightly different numbers, according to NFL.com.

NFL Network insider Michael Lombardi reported Monday that Chambers' three-year deal is valued at $12 million, with nearly $6 million guaranteed.

The guaranteed numbers mesh. Schefter reported that number at $5.9 million.

What's also interesting is that Lombardi's website, National Football Post, is reporting the Schefter numbers.

I'm not quite sure what the exact numbers are but Lombardi has been spot-on with quite a few major reports out of Kansas City so I may defer to him on this one. That's about $1 million cheaper per year so kudos Scott Pioli if that's the case.

Yeah it may not seem like a lot of money but it averages out to $1 million per year which is more than all but eight Chiefs players make.

Comment 58 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

As long as he’s signed, I dont care

by T-train61 on Mar 8, 2010 8:48 PM CST reply actions  

yep

either way, they are paying him about what he made last season… he played well enough not to get a pay cut, I think.

* KC now has the best coaching staff in the league
* Pioli will make at least one trade in the offseason, and 2 trades during the draft
* I'd prefer "lightning and lightning" as opposed to "lightning and thunder" when it comes to RBs
* 9-7 is a real possibility in 2010 IF the Chiefs get 4 new starters
* keep Albert at LT, upgrade the positions that NEED upgrading.C, RG, NT, S, LB

by stagdsp on Mar 8, 2010 8:54 PM CST up reply actions  

any word on TJ? Guess we didnt get him if its this late in the day?

by T-train61 on Mar 8, 2010 8:48 PM CST reply actions  

or hopefully

that means they’re hammering out a contract…

by KU2010 on Mar 8, 2010 8:51 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd be surprised

to hear anything before tomorrow when Fargas is scheduled to visit.

by bh13 on Mar 8, 2010 8:52 PM CST up reply actions  

My guess is that it is done... and he is a Chief.

There has not been any mention of him heading to any other place, like Wade Smith, and others have.

Go Chiefs!!!!

by ravenhawk on Mar 8, 2010 9:04 PM CST up reply actions  

true

But really you don’t hear about any of the 30 somethings RB’s making the rounds.

Don't Fuccop Succop

by chicks_love_chiefs on Mar 8, 2010 10:01 PM CST up reply actions  

I care

Not that I was upset, but I wAs surprised at the 5 million per year number considering that is what Burleson and Walter received.

by TonyG88 on Mar 8, 2010 8:59 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

Chambers is older

but he’s as good as those guys

You sometimes learn something everyday.

"We couldn't beat the Chiefs, but we damn near killed their horse."
-- Madden

by kabrink on Mar 8, 2010 9:06 PM CST up reply actions  

He's as good as Burleson

I’d rather have Walters.

Still, it’s a fine contract for the Chiefs, whichever #’s are accurate. The guaranteed money is what people need to focus on.

Will he be here for 3 years? Chances are, in the NFL, no.

by kcsno56 on Mar 9, 2010 8:31 AM CST up reply actions  

hes only making 5 or 6 garunteed

I really doubt he puts up the numbers to actually get the incentives

Chiefs 2010 big board-
Eric Berry
Dez Bryant
Taylor Mays
Rolando McClain
Russel Okung

by JrGrayson on Mar 8, 2010 9:37 PM CST up reply actions  

I could be mistaken

but I thought when Schefter announced it earlier he said it could be worth “up to” $15 mil

by badassz1987 on Mar 8, 2010 9:06 PM CST reply actions  

Bingo

the deal is for 12M-ish … with incentives based on production milestones increasing the value up towards 15M

by Detroit Buckets on Mar 8, 2010 9:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Soooooo....

Either way he made a shit ton of money. Good for him.

My sentiments are likely to be summed up with one of these 2 quotes:

"Shut the f--- up."- Matt Cassel
"WHAT THE F---?!?!"- Todd Haley

by Red N Gold Beast on Mar 8, 2010 9:08 PM CST reply actions  

Think he will keep up the level of play now that he got some money?

Winning isnt a matter of life and death, its more important than that.

by Pollard49 on Mar 8, 2010 9:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Who knows.

The guy has all the tools to be able to be Eddie Kennison version 2.0.

I doubt that Pioli and Haley would have wanted to keep him around if they thought that he was going to turn into a parasite after he got a contract. And, he gets to play SD twice a year. No doubt he’s looking forward to sticking it to them, and will definitely want to help take the division title from them.

My sentiments are likely to be summed up with one of these 2 quotes:

"Shut the f--- up."- Matt Cassel
"WHAT THE F---?!?!"- Todd Haley

by Red N Gold Beast on Mar 8, 2010 9:34 PM CST up reply actions  

The one play

that stood out to me with Chris Chambers was that slant route against Pittsburgh in OT, remember that? If we get that player back than all we need is Bowe to step up and whichever draft pick to make an impact…

Winning isnt a matter of life and death, its more important than that.

by Pollard49 on Mar 8, 2010 9:42 PM CST reply actions  

What does it matter?

We needed to re-sign him…and we did.

Since I don’t have to sign his paycheck…I could give a rat’s ass what he makes.

by Scott B. on Mar 8, 2010 9:49 PM CST reply actions  

+1

Draft prediction top 10 - 1. Bradford 2. Suh (Chiefs trade up) 3. McCoy 4. Claussen (trade Campbell to Carolina, trade for J Brown) 5. Okung (Detroit) 6. Berry 7. Haden 8. Campbell 9. Davis (Bills trade for Vick) 10. Morgan (Jags draft Tebow in 2nd round) 2/23/09 --> This will probably not happen, I was smoking crack at the time. Please Disregard.

by I_Bleed_Red. on Mar 8, 2010 9:56 PM CST up reply actions  

I dont care what he makes either

But I do give a rats ass if he earns it.

Winning isnt a matter of life and death, its more important than that.

by Pollard49 on Mar 8, 2010 10:13 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

rec'd

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 8, 2010 10:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Very true

Unfortunately, a signed contract does not guarantee production of equal proportion.

by Scott B. on Mar 8, 2010 10:23 PM CST up reply actions  

they should change that!

Winning isnt a matter of life and death, its more important than that.

by Pollard49 on Mar 8, 2010 10:24 PM CST up reply actions  

Your idea...

So get on it. And good luck with that.

by Scott B. on Mar 8, 2010 10:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Ill hollar at Goodell later, too busy workin atm!

Winning isnt a matter of life and death, its more important than that.

by Pollard49 on Mar 8, 2010 10:27 PM CST up reply actions  

I believe schefter

Once again we need to stop being cheap and quit trying to save money our low payroll is rediculus. he deserves the money that schefter reported anyway

by Swilk15 on Mar 8, 2010 10:16 PM CST reply actions  

He deserves it for last year I agree...

All Im sayin is i hope he keeps it consistent. His history shows he can slip off once he gets paid. I just dont wanna be stuck with another vet who wont play for his check. Tired of that personally.

Winning isnt a matter of life and death, its more important than that.

by Pollard49 on Mar 8, 2010 10:23 PM CST up reply actions  

SUPER REC, +1,000,000

Completely agree… they make millions playing a childhood game. couldnt put it better.

Winning isnt a matter of life and death, its more important than that.

by Pollard49 on Mar 8, 2010 10:25 PM CST up reply actions  

ty Pollard

as a teacher myself it’s been a grip of mine for awhile … not Chambers personally, of course … and it goes to all sports AND most forms of entertainment: music, movies, etc … not the average band playing in some bar, but the big names who make bazillions off records and concerts, and the superstar actors who rake it in for every movie

it’s a societal issue: we value entertainment more than we value the things that we truly need (policemen, firemen, teachers, nurses, soldiers) or those who do the most work for the least wages (factory workers, the guys who haul trash and garbage for minimum wage, etc)

thanks for understanding

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 8, 2010 10:29 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

I understand you point, also.

It’s a fucked up system…no doubt. Priorities are all out of whack, for sure.

However, people like you and I didn’t create the malfunction.

by Scott B. on Mar 8, 2010 10:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Oh man, no need.

Half of my moms side is workin for the city in one way or another, whether its a policeman/woman, firefighter teachers etc… They do the things we truly need like you said, if we didnt have those things, than where would we be…. I dont wanna know. And I for one would be making them a little more wealthy for their sacrifices and time.

Winning isnt a matter of life and death, its more important than that.

by Pollard49 on Mar 8, 2010 10:34 PM CST up reply actions  

Well Said!

Draft prediction top 10 - 1. Bradford 2. Suh (Chiefs trade up) 3. McCoy 4. Claussen (trade Campbell to Carolina, trade for J Brown) 5. Okung (Detroit) 6. Berry 7. Haden 8. Campbell 9. Davis (Bills trade for Vick) 10. Morgan (Jags draft Tebow in 2nd round) 2/23/09 --> This will probably not happen, I was smoking crack at the time. Please Disregard.

by I_Bleed_Red. on Mar 8, 2010 11:51 PM CST up reply actions  

The Point Where People Go Off-Track On This Argument

Is that they start thinking that markets rewarding value is the same as markets rewarding merit. And markets don’t reward merit, except coincidentally…they’re value based. Football players are well-compensated because they have rare skill sets that we’re willing to pay a lot of money to watch because it brings us joy. Teachers don’t bring that kind of value, except to individual students (although I’d also argue that part of the reason they’re so poorly compensated is because the government runs education like it does everything else…badly).

Moderator - Arrowhead Pride

by UCrawford on Mar 14, 2010 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

woah calm down

Dude i just want the chiefs to spend money like other teams out there and overpay someone i dont care if its a backup i want someone overpayed for once. i didnt say anything about afganistan

by Swilk15 on Mar 8, 2010 10:28 PM CST up reply actions  

Swik, not a blast towards you by ANY means ... you're cool

… and so am I …

hell, I'm like THE coolest Dude on all of AP

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 8, 2010 10:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Ok, I'm bored so I'll play devil's advocate with you

Sure, I’m fine with these guys making that much money because that’s what they are able to command in a free market system. Now, I’d have to be crazy to argue that being a Wide Receiver for the Kansas City Chiefs is more important than being a teacher, doctor, soldier etc., but as no one has yet figured out a good way to charge money to watch elementary school math classes or colonoscopies, we’re just going to have to accept that it is more profitable.

We could pay professional football players teacher-level salaries, but then the team owners would just get even richer. Is being a team owner more important than being a teacher? Of course not, so we pay them teacher salaries too. So then where does the money go, because I’m not going to stop watching sports, and I’d wager that neither is upamtn. We could give it all to the government to redistribute to the people as they see fit, but at that point money is really only changing hands symbolically and we’ve either moved to a radically socialist or proto-communist society.

And hey, maybe that’s the answer, and it’s not football that’s the problem, it’s capitalism – but until someone else defends that statement, I’m going to go ahead and take the position that either of the aforementioned systems is untenable when compared to free market capitalism, and thus I’m prepared to live with Chris Chamber’s new contract hanging over my conscience.

by MtHammer on Mar 8, 2010 10:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Some of those words were too big and important for me...

so ill just give you this….. =-)

Winning isnt a matter of life and death, its more important than that.

by Pollard49 on Mar 8, 2010 10:42 PM CST up reply actions  

How about this...

Why don’t we pay players a reasonable wage? Then, maybe regular working people could once again afford to take their family to games once in awhile. Stadiums would be full again…and life would be good. Less “business” and a lot more “game” would work very well for me.

Owners pay the players…but the players make the owners money…and blah, blah, blah. Which came first….the chicken or the egg? Who knows? But, this I do know…It got out of hand a long time ago.

by Scott B. on Mar 8, 2010 10:51 PM CST up reply actions  

The only result of that

Would be for the owners to dissolve their teams and find something more profitable to do.

And the players would either find different careers or go and play in countries where their earnings aren’t seized through govt coercion.

by alakan81 on Mar 9, 2010 12:13 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

wow Hammer ... way to take one for the team!

although, I can definitely see a market for Professional Colonoscopies in some circles … twisted but yeah, I can see that …

the idea of “Proto-Socialism” does have an appeal … and I do think there are MAJOR issues with a purely Caplitalistic economy … which of course we do not have by any means (ie, ours is not a “pure” system)

the biggest fallacy in your argument is the very fact that we DON’T have a true “market economy” … everything is so hopelessly tied together that even those on fixed incomes are adversely affected by what Chambers and others earn make … until all that gets untangled, it’s never going to be a “pure” system

fun to debate, though

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 8, 2010 10:54 PM CST up reply actions  

I disagree

While nobody is that much more important than you or me, they are more talented. So guys it comes down to supply and demand. When you are 1 of 1,000 people that are able to make it to the NFL which make hundreds of millions of dollars a year you my friend have what they want therefore you are paid to make plays and put people in the seats and sell jerseys and $8.00 beer.
Ask yourself if you were able to do what only the top .001 percent of the country could do at a high level, and were in high demand with people bidding for your services don’t you think you would be making millions also?

by ZachMartin2 on Mar 8, 2010 11:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Total BS!

I hate it when people say that.

That is like saying: “That doctor is overpaid because he makes 250k a year and he loves his job.”

Deserve: “To have earned or merited; to be worthy to have; To reward, to give in return for service”

They do deserve that paycheck. The amount is so much because there are not a lot of people that can do what they do. This is not a communist country where everyone gets paid the same amount. Its no difference from movie stars, bands, CEOs, doctors, etc.

The fact they love their jobs and that their job is a game has nothing to do with anything. If they don’t deserve the money the owners wouldn’t pay it. They have worked their asses off and have the unique physical gifts. They get paid for a unique service they provide.

The reason policemen, firemen, teachers, etc. don’t make that much is because they are easily replaceable. Its the same reason the guy at Burger King makes $7 an hour instead of 5 million.

by davidv on Mar 9, 2010 2:00 AM CST up reply actions  

I love how...

people are talking about how pro football players don’t deserve their salaries on a website where hundreds of people visit every day to talk about football players. If you want to know why Chris Chambers commands his salary…. look in the mirror.

OU SUCKS!!!!!!

by TexasFight83 on Mar 9, 2010 2:16 AM CST up reply actions   2 recs

But yes they deserve to be payed bro since the NFL is the most popular thing going in this country, and its because of the players.

by Swilk15 on Mar 8, 2010 10:30 PM CST reply actions  

where do u recommend that all of the money that is made in the NFL goes then if the players shouldnt make that much? i mean im going into teaching too but i dont think it should go to teachers that didnt work for it lol

by Swilk15 on Mar 8, 2010 10:34 PM CST reply actions  

And I dont think it is so much

make or break em S-dub, but cmon man, Julius Peppers, past his prime or real close to it, 90 million?!?!?! cant take a couple mill off of that? lol

Winning isnt a matter of life and death, its more important than that.

by Pollard49 on Mar 8, 2010 10:36 PM CST up reply actions  

yea obviously i wouldnt want to pay julious peppers that much but u know what i mean, i want to see that we are trying to compete lol

by Swilk15 on Mar 8, 2010 10:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Pollard ... some years ago when ARod signed that insane contract with the Yankees for what, $250 Mil, I did some fast math ...

… and figured out that was roughly the salary of 100 teachers for 100 years (at a low rate of $25k/year)

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 8, 2010 11:01 PM CST up reply actions  

i wonder if his experience

was used in signing him. I think its a great sign. He has the skill to play plus he is a veteran with playoff experience. He will on the field and an asset in the locker room

Great moments are born from great opportunity.

by muwxman on Mar 8, 2010 11:08 PM CST reply actions  

Unless you are in the Chiefs' front office. Does it really matter?

We got our only long ball receiver back for a good chunk of money. Great signing. Glad that we go Chris Chambers back.

by ChiefsFan90s on Mar 8, 2010 11:59 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog! Follow us on Facebook and on Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Calabaloo_small
Reviewing AP's Predictions For The Chiefs 2011 Season
Small
Some clarity on Peyton's injury
Crennelgatoradebathposterizedrough_small
Brian Daboll: Another Perspective
Dxmcc_copy_small
Why Drafting Robert Griffin Is Not Optional For The Kansas City Chiefs

Recent FanPosts

Small
What if.........
Small
Whats Your Opinion ?
Small
Former Players
Okoye_small
Setting the Trenches: Offensive Line
Small
The Three Most WTF Moments of the Chiefs Season
Chiefs_logo_small
Need some help, KC trip
9aaaa629560faa267f0a91faca7f420d-getty-135962716_small
Ben Grubbs.
Small
2012 Free Agency & Draft Predictions
Tobias_small
Options At Quarterback for 2012

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

23247_617116905_1805_n_small Chris Thorman

Headshot_small Joel Thorman

Editors

288-chiefstexans0944_sp_8-15-09_jfs woodman212

Matt_ssv_pic_small_small Matt Conner

Stag_20silhouette_small stagdsp

Lips-rhps_small upamtn

Contributors

Kc_ny_small NJ Chiefs Fan

Phoenix_by_melen_small KaloPhoenix

N1358340181_30185582_5800_small Flowers24

Small Jon Yoon

Dirkness_small HisDirkness

Cassel_small Steve_in_RI