Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Please, Someone Make Bob Sapp Stop Already

Chiefs List Of Needs Is Long But Inside Linebacker Might Be Tops

Photo

Bob Gretz of BobGretz.com has been covering the Kansas City Chiefs and pro football for over 30 years which means he's just about seen it all. And after talking with Mr. Gretz a few times throughout the season and reading his work on BobGretz.com, it's fair to say the man knows football.

So, when he says the Chiefs number one priority this offseason should be addressing the linebackers, I listen.

Star-divide

Gretz was asked what the single most important position for the Chiefs to upgrade this offseason and said, "The Chiefs must improve their defense, especially their run defense and if they can’t find a big bouncer in the middle who can shut down the A gaps and flow to the B and C gaps then there’s going to be constant problems in handing the opponent’s run game."

The numbers back him up on this one. The Chiefs defense was 31st against the rush last season.

As for the number one inside linebacker in the draft? Rolando McClain out of Alabama, coached by Nick Saban, who is a former colleague of Mr. Scott Pioli.

Great player + position of need + familiarity = a Chiefs draft pick, right?

Not so fast at the fifth pick, Gretz says.

"He’s coming out of the Nick Saban defense and that’s always going to get teams like the Chiefs excited," Gretz writes. "If Pioli can make a deal and move out of No. 5 to say … No. 10, McClain would be perfect for a ticket to Kansas City."

However, Gretz also points out that it wouldn't be the first time the Chiefs GM "reached" for a player at the top of the draft.

Check out a lot more interesting insight on the Combine and other Chiefs draft related stuff over at BobGretz.com.

Comment 257 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

How much was your monthly stipend?

I sent two Raccoon pelts and a Gator skin.
Joel should be stylin in the gatro boots and the Racoon cap come Sept :)

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 8:05 PM CST up reply actions  

I respectfully disagree.

I think having a nose tackle is more important. Gotta build at the line first. Our linebackers are serviceable. Especially if DJ steps up.

by Vince D on Mar 7, 2010 8:01 PM CST reply actions  

The LB's are far from serviceable...

Especially the inside linebackers. Mays and Williams are both garbage.

Don't Fuccop Succop

by chicks_love_chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 8:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Williams and Mays are horrible, yes

We can’t bank on DJs “potential”. All he has shown us that he can have one good game in a contract year. That is all.

by Nick Britt on Mar 7, 2010 8:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Williams is serviceable and Mays needs to be a backup

DJ needs an Attitude adjustment.

Code RED

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 8:07 PM CST up reply actions   2 recs

Williams needs to be a back up, and Mays needs 2 more years of coaching before hes ready to back up anyone

DJ’s attitude is fine, but he can’t do his job as a QB spy/shallows coverage playmaker without a stay at home run stuffer standing next to him.
NT is a huge need for sure. ILB runstuffer/QB blitzer is ‘almost’ as big of a need. And since we don’t seem to be in a position to get the NT, I’ll take the ILB.

Safety is way way too deep in this draft to be falling in love with Berry

The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw

by Texas Chief on Mar 8, 2010 12:01 AM CST up reply actions  

Speak for yourself

McClain lover! ;)

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 8, 2010 12:02 AM CST up reply actions  

Tex, then it's settled ... Spoon!

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 8, 2010 12:28 AM CST up reply actions  

Id take anyone..and I mean ANYONE...

that could step onto the field, KNOW the playbook inside and out, read the o, call the plays, stuff the run in the middle at the line (not 7 yards past it) and rush the QB….

It doesnt have to be McClain. I just happen to believe that McClain stands head and shoulders above every other 34 ILB in the draft, especially as it pertains to Crennels system and style of 3-4

The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw

by Texas Chief on Mar 8, 2010 12:32 AM CST up reply actions  

I hear ya, Brother ... if that's who got, I wouldn't be upset

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 8, 2010 12:50 AM CST up reply actions  

But at the same time...

A good nosetackle that can push the pocket and take up blockers frees up those LBs to make more plays….same for the Defensive backs…with quicker pressure on the QB, the DB do not have to cover as long, which has been a huge problem in KC for yrs….

by KCinAZ on Mar 7, 2010 11:16 PM CST up reply actions  

exactly

wilfork, hampton ngata….
only reason the linebackers are so good.

add berry to run the D and it would be awesome u think?

by kcstevesportsfan on Mar 8, 2010 2:43 AM CST up reply actions  

i really dont wanna pass up on berry

argue with me all you want but berry is that good of a player and can make an impact like … sean taylor, ed reed, troy palamalu, etc. I also think that DJ can be alright. but one reason our ILBs played so poorly this season was because of our NT problem

You're a goddamn quarterback! You know what that means? It's the top spot, kid. It's the guy who takes the fall. It's the guy everybody's looking at first - the leader of a team - who will support you when they understand you. Who will break their ribs and their noses and their necks for you, because they believe. 'Cause you make them believe. That's a quarterback.
--- Any given sunday

Cassel can lead us.

by BEEf_CHIEF on Mar 7, 2010 8:04 PM CST reply actions  

I think Tyson Jackson at #3 was a bigger reach than McClain would be at #5

Just my opinion.

I do think ILB is a big need. Is it #1? I’m not sure. I would say NT and interior O-line (RG, C) are probably more pressing needs. Unfortunately, we are going to have to reach at #5 on somebody to fill those needs, unless Okung, Suh, or G. McCoy miraculously falls to #5.

Of course trading down will be our first choice. I think that is what most teams want to do, especially with a draft this deep — stockpile picks. Just like last year, I don’t forsee us finding any willing parties.

by Nick Britt on Mar 7, 2010 8:05 PM CST reply actions  

Anybody we pick is going to be a reach

I would just rather reach at a more critical position. If it was me I would take an OT, but I’d be fine taking a NT or LB

by KCinIL on Mar 7, 2010 8:06 PM CST via mobile reply actions   1 recs

NT

if resolved then ILB or Secondary or Okung

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 8:06 PM CST reply actions  

Hmmmm.

Well, If someone like Suh isn’t available, then McClain is the best choice, Odds are still in favor of Suh not being available, and remember, Verdict is still out on T Jax, and he was a three pick. McClain would be a great answer at a position we desperately NEED. Am I saying ignore NT, No, but…McClain would be more value for the buck, we could get more picks if we trade back, and there are still some very good NT’s that will be available at the later points in the draft (Ala Troup) On top of that, we could very easily trade out of five for, to the ten spot for a first and a second rounder. Troup is very likely going to be better than Ron Edwards.

by BetterRedThanDead on Mar 7, 2010 8:06 PM CST reply actions  

What about Linval Joseph

Good size and did like 44 rep’s, i think. I don’t know much about him, but he could be gotten in the 3rd or 4th round.

by CPT.Caveman on Mar 8, 2010 12:32 AM CST up reply actions  

BRTD ... I dunno about that ...

while I agree Suh will be gone, it’s your next line that I disagree with (slightly)

If someone like Suh isn’t available, then McClain is the best choice

the more I read about and think about Spoon, the more I like him … and Berry wouldn’t be a bad choice either …

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 8, 2010 12:55 AM CST up reply actions  

My only concern with Berry

Is that, while we need a safety, It would be sort of like getting a QB. Without a decent interior line, NT and ILB, a decent safety is sort of a moot point. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t hate Berry, or anything, just, It seems a better option to grab more picks and shore up our interior line first. Can anyone give me some more info on Spoon? I’d like to read up on him.

by BetterRedThanDead on Mar 8, 2010 2:37 AM CST up reply actions  

we need our troy p.

and a LOT BETTER NT to make the 3-4 work the way steelersdo it…

by kcstevesportsfan on Mar 8, 2010 2:46 AM CST up reply actions  

Go linebacker with 2a or 2b...

Someone like Brandon Spikes might be around at 2a. Or even look at trading up to bottom of first to grab him. We need to get value for the #5 pick, and it’s not there at ILB.

by Paxos on Mar 7, 2010 8:07 PM CST reply actions  

I agree

There are some solid 2nd Round LBs

Man crush on Eric Berry.

by SwimCoach on Mar 8, 2010 7:50 AM CST up reply actions  

Maybe Gretz thinks

McClain
Spikes
Cody

Which is possible

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 8:10 PM CST reply actions  

So o-line in the third?

No problem with any of these players, but the investment in Cassel has to be protected. I’m not saying we spend the #5 pick on the o-line, but help needs to come at some point.

by Paxos on Mar 7, 2010 8:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Unlike NT or RB and maybe WR I see no reason to double down on ILB

OT/OG and a Center should be sufficient and if Okung is there I would now take him and be quite happy. Let Muir and Weis do there thing and put the best line together possible.

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 8:31 PM CST up reply actions  

guards and centers can be picked up in later rounds

good ones at that. All we really need for the oline is a center anyway. the blocking is improving now that they are understanding the system and working together more.

by TDubb on Mar 7, 2010 9:22 PM CST up reply actions  

ILB

Is also the easier position on the field to fill.

"Success is never ending, failure is never final."

by GenericBrand on Mar 7, 2010 8:11 PM CST reply actions  

In the article Bob did put these down(which I assume his order of preference according to need.

“On defense they need a nose tackle, two inside linebackers, one outside linebacker, another cornerback and two safeties.”

Also I’ll listen to his opinion of Alabama LB’s that have been considered a reach by Chiefs fans.

Go Chiefs!!!!

by ravenhawk on Mar 7, 2010 8:26 PM CST reply actions  

Notice how Bob, rightfully, did not list LT in his list of 15 needs. Yet some want the Chiefs to draft a LT with #5, which would be crazy, IMO.

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 8:35 PM CST up reply actions  

Yep

Since he was talking about defense and all…

Don't Fuccop Succop

by chicks_love_chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 9:17 PM CST up reply actions  

He was talking about the entire team. 15 Positions of need in his judgment. LT not among them.

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 9:24 PM CST up reply actions  

Yep...

I don’t think too many people are saying that LT is one of the biggest positions of need, but rather that perhaps the best way to upgrade the O line would be by moving Albert to LG and drafting a stud LT.

Don't Fuccop Succop

by chicks_love_chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 9:27 PM CST up reply actions  

That’s a HUGE gamble, since Albert has already proven he can play LT in the NFL, and any incoming rookie hasn’t. And then you also have to hope Albert can play LG in the NFL. Why gamble so much, when you can draft the best or 2nd best Guard in the draft in round 2, plug him in, and you’re set, and you’ve also plugged anoyther hole in round 1 with the best S, ILB, or NT in the draft.

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 9:36 PM CST up reply actions  

That's okay...

If you want to settle for an average LT. I think after watching Roaf might have spoiled me, but I really value a dominate LT, and that aint Albert.

Don't Fuccop Succop

by chicks_love_chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 9:39 PM CST up reply actions  

yet

Tweet me @GiftNate
N. Gift

by giftedchiefsfan on Mar 7, 2010 9:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Haley disagrees, and so do I. I think Albert is already above average, and the way he closed the season, on his way to being a stellar LT. Albert is ALOT closer to being a dominant NFL LT that some college LT. Doubt if any of them become Roaf.

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 9:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Then I wonder why Haley was talking about Alberts "versatility" lately....

I’m not saying your wrong, but really you have no idea what Haley really thinks about the guy based on an off the cuff remmark he made months ago.

Don't Fuccop Succop

by chicks_love_chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 9:45 PM CST up reply actions  

I know he thinks he’s a core player, and that the sky’s the limit for him. And since he’s only played LT for him, I think it’s a fair assumption to think he means as a LT. But no one REALLY knows what Haley, or Pioli think, I agree with that.

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 9:49 PM CST up reply actions  

I like what I see in Albert

He’s progressing nicely…and the reason he didn’t come in dominant was because LT was a new position for him. I think we’ll like the maturity we see in him this coming season.

Tweet me @GiftNate
N. Gift

by giftedchiefsfan on Mar 7, 2010 9:45 PM CST up reply actions  

In that part he was talking first... offense, and then defense.

He actually went on about offense more in the paragraph… but I believe he thinks that defense is a major concern(probably most important).

Go Chiefs!!!!

by ravenhawk on Mar 7, 2010 10:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Would agree with Gretz

Basically Ron Edwards, Mays, Williams, DJ, Vrable, Carr, Brown, and McGraw shouldn’t all be starters on D. Perhaps a combination of a couple of thoes guys would be alright, but not all of them. These guys should all be candidates to be replaced. ( At least as starters)

Dorsey, Jackson, Hali, and Flowers might all be guys that should start, but the jury is still out on a couple of these guys even. (in particular Jackson.)

There is a reason they were 31st in the league in D.

Don't Fuccop Succop

by chicks_love_chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 8:43 PM CST up reply actions  

not brown

he’s past his prime. good coach, maybe. but not a starter.

by TDubb on Mar 7, 2010 9:23 PM CST up reply actions  

So just Brown needs to be replaced?

he alone made the D that bad?

Don't Fuccop Succop

by chicks_love_chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 9:28 PM CST up reply actions  

i was narrowing the list

i have my other reasons, but he was the biggest hole IMO

by TDubb on Mar 7, 2010 9:29 PM CST up reply actions  

draft is deep on defense

Plus if we are looking to upgrade the offense with guys like thomas jones or fargas, there needs to be help on the o-line in a big way.

by golfbard on Mar 7, 2010 8:33 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

please explain further

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 8:34 PM CST up reply actions  

yes we don't need to reach very far

I agree

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 8:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Oline needs to get better this year. No exceptions.

Do we have guys right now that can do that? Probably. But JC can make do with the zone blocking scheme they implemented late in the year. Fargas and Jones may need a little better blocking. And goal line is goal line. Zone blocking doesn’t work so well down there.

Charles to the 20... 10... TOUCHDOWN! KANSAS CITY!

by Falcon58 on Mar 7, 2010 9:13 PM CST up reply actions  

zone blocking

correct me if Im wrong but hasn’t jones ran behind zone blocking before?

8-8 is possible in 2010 and it wont take breaking the bank on 2nd tear free agents getting lucrative contracts because the free agent pool is so weak this year!

by Chieffan_Toby on Mar 7, 2010 9:16 PM CST up reply actions  

O Line yes, LT no. As Bob said, we need help at G and C, and those should be addressed, starting with round 2.

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 8:36 PM CST up reply actions  

We were going to address that I think

in a big way suggests that Thomas and Fargas would need more than what Charles was able to run behind.

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 8:38 PM CST up reply actions  

if we do get Okung and put him at LT, then Albert moves to LG and that side of the line is solid for a decade

that’s my reasoning on Okung … yes we can get other OLine on round 2 … we can also get NT or S in round 2 as well

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 8:38 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Nate Allen and Terrence Cody

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 8:48 PM CST up reply actions  

But we already have a solid, young LT, and it would be foolish, IMO, to draft another one who “may” be as good as Albert, and start moving guys around. Albert excelling at LG is hardly a sure thing, but we already know he has the ability to do so at LT because he already has. It would be a whole lot smarter, IMO, to draft a Guard in round 2, and have him team with Albert to be solid for a decade, and draft a real need, like Berry, McClain, or Dan Williams in round 1.

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 8:48 PM CST up reply actions  

dablue ... I won't argue with ya on that ... though McClain kind of bothers me a bit ...

Berry I’d be very happy with …

and Steve, no thank you on Cody

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 8:50 PM CST up reply actions  

He is a mother loving pound or two of NT :)

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 8:55 PM CST up reply actions  

After the combines, Berry has definitely moved ahead of McClain on my list. But they are both waaaaaaaay ahead of LT, which isn’t even on my(or Gretz’s) list, and hopefully not on Pioli’s either.

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 9:10 PM CST up reply actions  

dablue - serious question for you here ...

your honest opinion on any given highly rated OT playing either RT or OG?

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 9:22 PM CST up reply actions  

Don’t know. It varies with each person. Albert is athletic, with good feet, and those types excel at LT. Guard and RT is usually is a different body type than he has now. More road grader, bulkier types. He’s never played on the right side, and I know McIntosh was bad at LT, but HORRIBLE at RT. Point is, we know Albert can be a very good, maybe even great(Haley thinks sky’s the limit) LT in the NFL, and you don’t move such a young guy out of that position, for a “maybe” at LT, and a “maybe” that he can play another position. We have enough real needs that can be filled at #5 to not start such an experiment.

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 9:30 PM CST up reply actions  

If Okung was there Albert and Okung could battle it out for awhile

loser battles O’Callahan, losers moves to swing tackle or RG.
Can all be handled in preseason line is stronger.
We would still need that Center/Guard candidate.
Pouncey or another to do the same thing from the inside out.
Niswanger vs Center candidate. Loser moves to guard battle and
in the end we have some serious depth on the o-line for years.

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 8:53 PM CST up reply actions  

if we got Okung, Albert can indeed move to LG as that's where he played in college

that anchors the left side … blind side … for a decade

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 9:27 PM CST up reply actions  

But he’s a natural NFL LT. What he played in college isn’t as relevant as what he’s played, and done well at, in the NFL. The only reason you would ever move a young LT to another position is if he couldn’t play LT( likeGallery)

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 9:32 PM CST up reply actions  

you mean the way a young Brian Waters was moved from C to G?

and drafted out of college as a TE if I recall

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 9:35 PM CST up reply actions  

Brian Waters was moved around because he was a failure, and they, and he were trying to salvage an NFL career, which they did when he moved to G. He also put on tons of weight from college. None of that applies to Albert because he’s a very good prospect at LT already, who has shown flashes of excellence there.
By that logic, we should move Waters to TE, since he played it in college??

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 9:40 PM CST up reply actions  

It's a different position

Tackles aren’t tackles just because they’re the “biggest and best” linemen on a team, necessarily, but because they match the physical skill-set demanded by that position.

Playing tackle is much more about your feet and ability to set quickly and move laterally. Having great feet is somewhat wasted at guard, because you don’t have to mirror or kick slide in such a wide area. Playing guard is more about “playing in a phone booth” and, in some cases, being athletic enough to pull/trap/scoop/etc. You can have average feet and good knee bend and technique and be a great guard, but not a tackle.

by alakan81 on Mar 7, 2010 9:39 PM CST up reply actions  

or perhaps a upgrade at RT over O'Call?

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 9:49 PM CST up reply actions  

hey...anyone we bring in at virtually any position

who could challenge for the starting job or take it outright will make a difference for the team. I like O’Cal personally. In fact the whole O’line improved drastically toward the end of the season; though it was far from perfect. Obviously with the voids there now we must fill them and challenge those starters. However the powers that be can get it done, I’ll be happy with.

Tweet me @GiftNate
N. Gift

by giftedchiefsfan on Mar 7, 2010 10:07 PM CST up reply actions  

aye

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 10:08 PM CST up reply actions  

true except ... we do a lot of zone blocking (and I assume Weis will also want to pull and shift some)

so that said … someone with the size, strength and athleticism of Okung or Campbell could play either position … no? Campbell, for example, a VERY strong dude and yet can move as well … that wouldn’t be a major upgrade?

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 9:48 PM CST up reply actions  

A major upgrade over Albert???? Not in any way, shape, or form, IMO. And you don’t draft any other OL position at #5 except LT, and we don’t need one. And we don’t know if any of those guys, or Albert, could play another position in the NFL, but it’s moot because you don’t draft another OL position that high.
Campbell has bust written all over him, IMO. Was a mediocre player on tape, and shined at the combine. an Al Davis special. Okung will probably be a very good LT in the NFL, but we already have a guy that’s better now, and at least as good going forward.

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 9:54 PM CST up reply actions  

I meant major upgrade for the OLine in general ...

and I think Campbell likely COULD play LG … or RT for that matter

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 10:01 PM CST up reply actions  

I don’t think moving Albert off LT and playing a rookie at LT would be an upgrade at all, more of a downgrade and “maybe” equality in a couple of years IF the rookie works out and Albert can play a different position. I’d rather keep Albert where he’s proven he can play in the NFL, and draft the other positions with players that have played those positions, and project to those positions.
I don’t want any part of Campbell. boom or bust.

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 10:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Generally speaking, guys that are "high cut", tall (6'5" or 6'6"+) with long arms and legs

Don’t play at guard, no matter how athletic, strong, and talented they are.

It’s just the wrong body type. Especially if you want to utilize them in a zone blocking scheme where you need to get low and push guys with lower centers of gravity out to make a cutback lane.

by alakan81 on Mar 7, 2010 10:05 PM CST up reply actions  

fair enough, ty

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 10:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Of course

As has been noted many times, Albert played guard in college and he’s not exactly short.

Sometimes just depends on scheme.

by alakan81 on Mar 7, 2010 10:08 PM CST up reply actions  

there ya go ...

and a Campbell, for example, might be an upgrade at RT if not LT …

and as you and others have noted: Haley talked about Albert’s versatility … and … we have no idea what Weis will want, ultimately … and/or how much he’ll be in Pioli’s ear

plus, a good deal of it will likely be based on who’s available … not to mention possible trades that you have to factor in

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 10:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Would you draft a RT at #5?? Or a Guard???

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 10:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Maybe Center

Campbell may be able to play center…remember Don Mosebar from Oakland years ago? He was 6’9" and well cut like Campbell. He moved from being an All American T at USC to C as a pro. Powell’s quickness may be an asset if he is able to learn the C position.

Just saying there are options with a guy like that…you can’t teach speed and quickness very often. Heck, he may make a good blocking TE!!!

Tweet me @GiftNate
N. Gift

by giftedchiefsfan on Mar 7, 2010 10:18 PM CST up reply actions  

ha!
he may make a good blocking TE

do we have any?

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 10:21 PM CST up reply actions  

Albert played Guard in College because Ferguson and Monroe couldn’t, and he was versatile enough to do it. But he projected to an NFL LT based on size and skill set. Could he play guard in the NFL? Maybe, but when you have a kid that can play LT in the NFL, you don’t move him off it.

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 10:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Although with Campbell's quickness and speed

he would make a good pulling guard IF

He figures out a way to get those long legs to bend when he stays home.

Tweet me @GiftNate
N. Gift

by giftedchiefsfan on Mar 7, 2010 10:10 PM CST up reply actions  

one thing about Campbell: he *IS* strong

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 10:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Not piling on here, my brain just recalls things in random spurts

One of the things about Campbell that they kept mentioning is his lack of physicality in run blocking, which is a problem at either right tackle or any inside position.

by alakan81 on Mar 7, 2010 10:16 PM CST up reply actions  

So was Tank Tyler and Vernon Ghoulston, who may be the defensive equivalent of Campbell. workout warrior, amazing measurables, but a football player????

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 10:21 PM CST up reply actions  

Hey, this is the NFL

Being able to play football is purely optional.

by alakan81 on Mar 7, 2010 10:22 PM CST up reply actions  

I wouldn't say they're mutually exclusive

You can be a workout warrior AND a football player

by alakan81 on Mar 7, 2010 10:24 PM CST up reply actions  

Tony "Gym Rat" Gonzalez

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 10:35 PM CST up reply actions  

He’s also a good player. Ghoulston, so far isn’t, and Campbell, in college, wasn’t particularly.

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 10:25 PM CST up reply actions  

how about this guy in 2nd round ... move to G

Anthony Davis 6’6, 330 pounds Rutgers
Davis made a smooth transition from guard to tackle last season, starting 11 games and earning all-conference honors. One of the top recruits in school history, Davis is a very good run blocker thanks to his frame that is powerful throughout. Against the pass rush, he does well redirecting rushers to the far outside

Walter Football updated Feb. 28, 2010
Davis is a massive blocker with some athleticism. He’s an intriguing prospect. Anthony Davis’ 21 bench press reps weren’t a big deal because he was considered more of an athletic tackle. However, Davis didn’t exactly look too athletic on Saturday, running a 5.35 and looking stiff in the drills. Bryan Bulaga could be ahead of him

slow but strong, fairly typical G and good vs run … just a thought

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 10:27 PM CST up reply actions  

Certainly sounds like a better fit than

Campbell. Just depends on who is looking at him at tackle in the first round possibly.

by alakan81 on Mar 7, 2010 10:30 PM CST up reply actions  

I could live with that

1 Berry (S) or Spoon (LB)
2a Davis (G)
2b ??? (Defense)

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 10:34 PM CST up reply actions  

Spoon with our first pick?

the guy is a 43 OLB, just like DJ. No thanks to spoon at 5.

Don't blame me, I voted for content of character.

by paratrooper on Mar 8, 2010 7:12 AM CST up reply actions  

my thought is along those lines...

draft okung, give BA one more year at LT. put okung at RT which i believe he played in college for a few years. if we dont see improvement in BA, we have okung to move to LT in his second season. BA takes LG or moves to RT.

still, i dont think we should draft okung but if it happened, thats what i would want to see.

by MountainManMike on Mar 7, 2010 11:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Albert played LG in college ... I could see Campbell at RT ... or Anthony Davis at LG

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 8, 2010 12:25 AM CST up reply actions  

i agree with this strategy

One pick solves two positions if you go LT in rd 1. Get a NT and safety in rd 2 as u said.

by golfbard on Mar 7, 2010 8:50 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

No, it only solves one position, because there is a LT in place

Drafting Okung with the 5th pick and moving Albert inside is essentially taking a guard at that spot unless you believe Okung is leaps and bounds above Albert.

Draft a guard in round 2 or 3 and you’ve addressed the same issue for a fraction of the value.

The biggest question is do you think Okung is an All-Pro LT or is he just a good tackle that’s available.

by RedNose on Mar 7, 2010 9:28 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

to be honest, there are two guys I think that could be all world LTs

the following excerpts are from mockingthedraft (updated back in Oct) and from waltersfootball (updated a week ago)

Russell Okung | 6’5, 300 pounds | Oklahoma State
What makes Okung good is his initial first step and an excellent kick slide. In the running game, Okung finishes off his blocks really well

Walter Football updated Feb. 28, 2010
Lions would be wise to draft him No. 2 overall. But regardless of what happens there, Okung is not making it past the Chiefs at No. 5

Bruce Campbell | 6’7, 310 pounds | Maryland
Campbell is a natural left tackle who might be the most athletic offensive lineman in the class. He has good length to handle speed rushers and is a better run blocker than most think

Walter Football updated Feb. 28, 2010
Bruce Campbell is officially a “great player.” Campbell ran a 4.85 at the Combine, which unquestionably got Al Davis’ attention. It’ll be a huge upset if Campbell isn’t drafted No. 8 overall

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 9:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Okung looks decent to me. But I don't see him being significantly better than Albert.

I haven’t seen Campbell at all, but all anyone is saying is that he’s a freak but the tape on him isn’t great. The next Tony Mandarich?

by RedNose on Mar 7, 2010 9:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Campbell is a monster!

Did you see him standing next to J. Looney in the interview? My goodness!
He’s fast, quick feet and a near perfect human specimen…not much body fat.

However, I haven’t seen any game film on him….so wouldn’t know how good Campbell really is.

Tweet me @GiftNate
N. Gift

by giftedchiefsfan on Mar 7, 2010 9:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Well, hopefully, at least

He’s not on da Juice like Mandarich was.

But, yes, the consensus has been that he’s got “Looks like Tarzan, Plays Like Jane” disease.

by alakan81 on Mar 7, 2010 9:41 PM CST up reply actions  

We got that guy

Barry Richardson

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 10:36 PM CST up reply actions  

yeah but..

With Albert at Tackle and Water’s at guard the left side is already solid.
The problems start at Center and move to the Right. That plan would fix what ins’t broke, and leave broken what needs fixing

The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw

by Texas Chief on Mar 8, 2010 12:07 AM CST up reply actions  

Thank you TC.

I seriously do not understand this kind of logic.

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 8, 2010 12:08 AM CST up reply actions  

solid for a year or so, but Waters is not getting younger. last I looked ...

… pretty much any improvement on the OLine is … well … an improvement

I’d be happy with a 2a OLine pick … Anthony Davis of Rutgers, for example, would make a fine LG

then we can still get Berry or Spoon in 1st Round … and a NT with 2b

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 8, 2010 12:22 AM CST up reply actions  

Id be happy with improvement to our O-Line too

But the higher rounders need to be used to fix whats broken…the Center, RG and RT….

We can get later round projects to coach up for a couple years behind Waters if you think he has that left. I see no point in blowing the wad of a high draft pick on a position we don’t have an immediate NEED for, when we have so many immediate NEEDS to fill.

The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw

by Texas Chief on Mar 8, 2010 12:28 AM CST up reply actions  

Spoon

upamtn u sure like spoon… guess I need to do my research on him.

8-8 is possible in 2010 and it wont take breaking the bank on 2nd tear free agents getting lucrative contracts because the free agent pool is so weak this year!

by Chieffan_Toby on Mar 8, 2010 2:35 AM CST up reply actions  

wow ... interesting stuff, ty Joel

however, some of our respected colleagues here on AP (hrmills for one) will argue that (on Defense) the priorities are Secondary-NT and that LB is down the list (his argument is that a shutdown DLine and shutdown Secondary makes the LB corps far less important, and that does stand to reason

plus, as many of us also know, we need OLine improvement as well … obviously we can’t get ALL our weaknesses addressed at one time (though we’d all love to) … sure, I’d love to get Suh AND Berry AND Okung AND a few others … it just isn’t gonna happen

I wouldn’t be upset with Berry as first pick, though I’d rather have Okung … face it, there are a LOT of guys in this draft who, if they pan out, would help us this year … I can see 3 or even 4 starters coming out of a draft this deep and talented (and with a smart trade down from the #5 slot, even another ontop of that)

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 8:35 PM CST reply actions  

Yes

and due to you and Mills and many more I can see a plan for any of the top picks. All will help us in 2010 and beyond. I have grown comfortable numb on the plan for the Chiefs. As many have stated I was a novice Football fan before AP. Now I watch Line play and not just the ESPN hilite shots. I know 3-4 and 4-3 and stunts and blitzes, Shallows MY God what a great Chess match Football is.

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 8:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Steve, now I'm wondering if this LB thing from Gretz isn't part of some Chiefs "misinformation" plan designed to make OTHER teams THINK we want LBs

… hey, ya never know!

yah, so many good players out there this year, I think Pioli could throw darts at a list on the wall and hit at least a couple that would help us … of course, that’s also because we have so many places where damn near anyone is an upgrade

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 8:48 PM CST up reply actions  

If you are looking at clues, and I would caution against reading too much into things, consider this. Gretz mentioned several players as impressive but didn’t mention McClain. He only spoke about McClain when specifically asked about him. When he did, he praised McClain as much as the others.

Merlinnj

by merlinnj on Mar 7, 2010 8:55 PM CST up reply actions  

I have been around Gretz ohh 25 years or so

Gretz has the inside sources but he is a reporter first and has been for oh 20+ years.

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 8:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Oh, btw. your email is still not working. Do they have IT people in the middle of the country? lol (j/k)

Merlinnj

by merlinnj on Mar 7, 2010 9:05 PM CST up reply actions  

My IT dept is superb

It is very tough transition to Active Directory from where we are coming from.
Give me a call in my right now if possible in my info block

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 9:08 PM CST up reply actions  

HAD inside sources. Since Pioli came, he is on the outside and as clueless as to what Pioli is going to do as the rest of us.

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 9:08 PM CST up reply actions  

I really am beginning to think Pioli is not going ILB at #5

it is possible (upamtn) that Weatherspoon or Spikes falls to that 2b spot.
would would much better fit the salary structure of an ILB.

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 9:04 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd love Spoon

so long as we get OLine at 2A … sure

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 9:24 PM CST up reply actions  

just an FYI on Spoon

from walterfootball, updated 3/2

Weatherspoon is unquestionably the top linebacker in this class after Rolando McClain.

now, he is OLB … think that’s a huge concern? I don’t …

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 9:44 PM CST up reply actions  

I know

this is going to sound stupid but maybe we need herm Edwards to come in and help us ace this draft!

I LOVE MY CHIEFS

by kcchiefsfan515 on Mar 7, 2010 10:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Special Consultant - Defense

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 10:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Here's a fun fact for ya

I was reading a book today written by Ron Vanderlinden, who has been the linebackers coach at Penn State since 2001. The book is about the base defenses that they use there, the Eagle and the Stack, which for lack of a longer explanation are sortof a hybrid 4-4/3-4 look with one-gap principles in the front 7.

Anyway, one of the positions is the “rush end”, which he notes Tamba Hali was an All-American playing. But the interesting thing is that it’s not a pure d-end position, as they sometimes have the rush end play from a two-pt stance and even drop out to cover the flat in some situations. Sound familiar?

Just thought that was pretty interesting.

by alakan81 on Mar 7, 2010 8:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Sounds like the Falcon

Nice info.

Charles to the 20... 10... TOUCHDOWN! KANSAS CITY!

by Falcon58 on Mar 7, 2010 9:21 PM CST up reply actions  

+1

8-8 is possible in 2010 and it wont take breaking the bank on 2nd tear free agents getting lucrative contracts because the free agent pool is so weak this year!

by Chieffan_Toby on Mar 7, 2010 9:13 PM CST up reply actions  

If we go ILB we should go Weatherspoon

If we’re gonna reach let’s go with weatherspoon from mu. Or Mt. Cody after all mcclain wouldn’t be anything without him in front of him. Spikes would be good too. We should trade up and get Suh, or Berry.

by ChiefDailyBaked on Mar 7, 2010 9:06 PM CST reply actions  

we won't need to trade up to get Berry ... not the way things look right now

that, of course, could change

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 9:26 PM CST up reply actions  

If berry makes it past TB, I think he’ll be there for us.

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 10:44 PM CST up reply actions  

No, not McClain

We need Hithard McRunfast.

Being smart is overrated.

by alakan81 on Mar 7, 2010 9:10 PM CST reply actions  

Im not so down on Demorrio.

I would disagree that he shouldnt be a starter. He’s more then capable as an ILB in a 3-4. I think people instantly think about the Ray Lewis’ and Patrick Willis’ of the league and have too high of expectations. I do agree however that we need a new starting ILB whoever it is to play alongside DWill.

"Success is never ending, failure is never final."

by GenericBrand on Mar 7, 2010 9:16 PM CST reply actions  

Demorrio would be fine

If he could get someone reliable next to him that is also big and physical enough to take on guards and fullbacks and allow Williams a chance to make a tackle behind, at, or close to the line of scrimmage.

That’s one of those “invisible” stats. It just says 100 tackles, it doesn’t say where they happened and that’s incredibly important.

by alakan81 on Mar 7, 2010 9:32 PM CST up reply actions  

Agreed, Sort of.

Demorrio is a little light both in physique and playing style to be lined up inside with guys like DJ and Mays.

Even if he had a Channing Crowder type beside him, I still don’t like him as much more than a Nickel LB on a good defense.

As a sub and special teamer though, I think he’s ideal.

by RedNose on Mar 7, 2010 9:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Agree with you unfortunately we are a few players away from having a good defense

by karkz86 on Mar 7, 2010 9:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Well, yes, he's not ideal by any stretch

But he can at least be counted on to put his hat on the man with the ball. And to me, that’s about the best thing you do as an inside linebacker.

by alakan81 on Mar 7, 2010 9:46 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd say

“if” we could trade down, I’d take either a NT like Dan Williams, or WR Dez Bryant with the 1st. With the additional 2nd rounder I’d use it on Spikes if he’s there. We could possibly snag Ducasse and Cam Thomas that way. Plus Myron Rolle would be a steal in the 4th so we’d have at least one solid Safety.

Thomas Jones and the Lombardi, DO IT!

by shotty on Mar 7, 2010 9:53 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't think it will be all that difficult to find an upgrade

If Studebaker can step up, or if a good OLB is drafted in round 2 or 3 to man the strong outside spot, Vrabel could move in to an inside spot, which would make the unit a lot more sturdy. His best days in NE he was playing both positions, but a lot more ILB if I recall correctly.

Anyway, my point is even with all the needs we have, I think that an upgrade over DW isn’t a difficult task, but he’s by no means a disaster if they have to use him as a starter next season.

by RedNose on Mar 7, 2010 9:54 PM CST up reply actions  

The Sudenator

played well when he filled in for Vrabel. I’ve heard he’s not honed his pass rushing skills yet though.

Tweet me @GiftNate
N. Gift

by giftedchiefsfan on Mar 7, 2010 10:12 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree

I think Demorrio and Brandon Spikes would be more than adequate in the middle.

I think they’d be helped a bunch if we can get Mount Cody to play in the middle as well. All linebackers are helped by good Dline play

by KU2010 on Mar 7, 2010 9:56 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Completely agree

We seem to want DJ to stay so he’s probably a starter next year. But a guy like Rolando next to him could definitely help, not only DJ but the entire D. He gets everyone in position to make the play, one reason why Alabama D was so good this year.

by Green-Monster on Mar 7, 2010 10:04 PM CST reply actions  

rather have Spoon than McClain ... just my opinion

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 10:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Cody and McClain

Those guys are overrated. It was all that other talent around them.

by alakan81 on Mar 7, 2010 10:06 PM CST up reply actions  

BERRY, HUGHES, GILYARD, TROUP!

Im disliking McClain more and more. Yes he’s smart, high football IQ, etc…but he is slow, and doesnt attack. He is a read, react, and wait LB. He doesnt blow up plays like Ray Lewis, P Willis to name a few.

by Larryemcdaniel on Mar 7, 2010 10:15 PM CST reply actions  

You do NOT take a safety with the 5th pick either, say no to Berry

… you see how dumb making ‘positional’ rules for draft picks is?
You know what the #1 position for highest bust rate as a top 10 pick is…all time?

Quarterback.

So that means no one should ever take a QB with a top 5 pick either, right?

The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw

by Texas Chief on Mar 8, 2010 12:11 AM CST up reply actions  

booo

you’ve never seen Berry play.

Man crush on Eric Berry.

by SwimCoach on Mar 8, 2010 7:51 AM CST up reply actions  

ummmmmmmmm ... you don't? and why, pray tell, don't you take an ILB with 5th pick?

I mean, if that’s your biggest need and there’s a concensus on a given ILB being worth it … why not?

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 8, 2010 12:19 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree with you there,

id take a ILB at 5 if he has some freak skills and the smarts to start and make an impact from day one.
I think at 5 we have to take the type of talent that you wont be able to find later in the draft. I know Pioli has a tendacy to “reach” but if i were a GM, id take a ILB or S if i thought they were elite and head ans shoulders above the rest of the class.

Don't blame me, I voted for content of character.

by paratrooper on Mar 8, 2010 7:27 AM CST up reply actions  

I dont think Dan Williams makes it past us.

Remember… This year, there are 14 that’s right, 1 4 teams running a 3-4. And I don’t think there are more than 4-5 NT in the league! The crop of LBs is extremely deep. From what I’ve seen, you can find very productive starters in the middle round at OLB/ILB. Perhaps not pro-bowlers but better talent than what we currently have. Same goes for FS. Actually there are a few guys coming out listed as FS but will end up playing SS due to their size and range.
 If you take a step back and look at it from a broader perspective: a domimant NT makes Dorsey look like the best in his draft class and TJ look like the #3 pick. If that happens up front, imagine what it will due for the LBs.

by Lokrath on Mar 7, 2010 10:25 PM CST reply actions  

Agreed

I’d like to see us get a NT, just not with 5th pick, idealy if we could move down I would love this move but that is fantasy land. I just don’t know if Dan Williams is all the great to be picked with #5, but now that I think about it Vince Wilfork was picked #24, so……………………

by Chiefs3188 on Mar 7, 2010 10:39 PM CST up reply actions  

NT is our biggest need

First and foremost, we address the NT position. LB’s are nice just like WR’s are nice on O. Finish the line and then go there.

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 10:38 PM CST reply actions  

ok, and if both Suh and McCoy are gone ... do you suggest we reach for Williams?

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 10:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Why would drafting a position of extreme need like NT be a “reach”, but drafting a luxury position like LT not be a “reach”? If Williams is rated a top 10 player, and the unquestioned best NT in the draft, I would be more than fine with him, if Berry’s gone, and McClain runs slow at his workout.

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 10:43 PM CST up reply actions  

well, Williams is NOT rated Top 10 to my knowledge ... and since when is LT a luxury?

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 10:44 PM CST up reply actions  

When you already have a young one that you drafted in round 1, 2 years ago, and is playing well.
Williams, if he makes it past us, won’t make it past all 3 of Buffalo at #9, Denver at #11, or Miami at #12, so to say he’s be an extreme reach at #5 is accurate, IMO.

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 10:46 PM CST up reply actions  

no worries ... Okung won't fall to us anyway

neither will Suh or McCoy, sadly

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 10:48 PM CST up reply actions  

I just hope they don’t take Belaga then. I have nothing at all against Okung, and if we needed a LT, I’d want him.

by dablueguy on Mar 7, 2010 10:50 PM CST up reply actions  

Agreed

Or Dez for that matter

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 10:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Mayock Big Board

Mayock has Dan Williams rated above McClain, I don’t know how much faith I put in this but NT is the biggest need so if we are talking about reaching for McClain why not just “reach” for Willaims

by Chiefs3188 on Mar 7, 2010 10:51 PM CST up reply actions  

If we did take him

I can’t say that I’d bitch a whole lot.

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 10:52 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd go for Williams ahead of McClain right now ...

… and damn near anyone ahead of Bryant

yes, that includes Steve (just not at NT)

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 10:53 PM CST up reply actions  

You'll have to make a post for that one

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 10:55 PM CST up reply actions  

sure thing ... see if you can get a pic

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 10:56 PM CST up reply actions  

OK

Now go for it!

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 11:01 PM CST up reply actions  

funny, I thought he's be taller

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 11:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Where are my ears?

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 11:05 PM CST up reply actions  

you don;'t NEED ears, you're a QB ...

… now SNAP THE F***ING BALL, OK?

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 11:07 PM CST up reply actions  

what

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 11:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Apparently...

You’re better suited to play QB than you are NT ;)

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 11:08 PM CST up reply actions  

My wife won't let me throw the deep ball anymore

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 11:10 PM CST up reply actions  

damn Steve ... I didn't know you ever COULD go "deep"

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 11:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Once back in '79

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 11:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Buck, on second thought, I think we should send Steve in with kray

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 11:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Yes

just like this…

Perfect!

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 11:13 PM CST up reply actions  

As long as Kray Ain't riding on my back

seems he might be a crop kind.
I hate crops and switches

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 11:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Steve, just promise one thing ...

if you and kray DO go to Pioli with our wish list, just promise that you won’t make an ass of yourself … ok?

thanks, Bro, we luvya!

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 11:17 PM CST up reply actions  

By George!

I think he’s got it!

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 11:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Well I might but

Kray wanted to steal Arrowhead in the back of his car! Who is exactly going to be the brains of this operation?

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 11:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Joel

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 11:21 PM CST up reply actions  

Well...

I thought you were the ass and Kray was the mouth. Hmmm… I’m not sure where that leaves the brain.

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 11:23 PM CST up reply actions  

No

I say we take Berry and then draft a big’ol fat dude in the second and then another in the fourth or fifth actually. :)

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 10:43 PM CST up reply actions  

I have officially withdrawn my name from consideration for NT

plus 250 at going to cut it anyway :)

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 10:44 PM CST up reply actions  

TMI Steve

Hahaha! Now some wise-ass is gonna post a non-football thread asking how much we all weigh and what our favorite thing to grill is!

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 10:48 PM CST up reply actions  

and Buck, shame on you ... I mean, really, how DARE you ...

argue with Gretz and question his knowledge, that's like questioning Pioli and what exactly ARE your qualifications to qustion the wisdom and experience of me or krayfish or Lanier or Satch who's still waiting on his side dishes ...

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 10:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Screw Gretz!

Screw all the draft experts. I’m an AP member and even though we don’t always agree, we know more than they do.

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 10:44 PM CST up reply actions  

oh yeah, we do, don't we

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 10:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Yes

consensus says AP rocks

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 10:46 PM CST up reply actions  

awesome! now all we have to do is take our always on target opinions to Pioli

… for that I nominate … krayfish!

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 10:47 PM CST up reply actions  

YES!

Our stand-up ambassador from Florida! Here here!

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 10:50 PM CST up reply actions  

and Lanier to make a "video"

kray: Mr Pioli, my name is …
Pioli: get out!
kray: but Sir, my name is …
Pioli: are you deaf, son? I said get out … now GO!
kray: but Mr Pioli, I represent Arrowhead Pride and we have a list of …
Pioli: I don’t care if you represent the Pope and have the secret recipe for KFC
kray: but SIr, we want the BEST players for our team and we think you should
Pioli: kid, what the hell have you been smoking?
kray: my suit, Mr Pioli, but that’s not the point, you see we have a list of …
Pioli: SECURITY!

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 11:00 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

We should have

“Alaskan Thunder F#@k” embroidered across the back

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 11:04 PM CST up reply actions   2 recs

can't ... type ... laffing ... too ... hard ...

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 11:05 PM CST up reply actions  

I can see him now

Kicking in the front door at One Arrowhead Drive! Hehe!

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 11:10 PM CST up reply actions  

Is that his Motorcycle Club?

Tampa Bay Chapter

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 11:09 PM CST up reply actions  

Buck ... YOU explain it to him

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 11:10 PM CST up reply actions  

'ere... 'ere

pass it to the left!

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 11:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Look north

see Alaskan81’s comment about fibers. ;)

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 11:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Anyone think of this?

1st Dan Williams
2nd Golden Tate
2nd Brandon Spikes
3rd Thadieous Gibson

That would fill alot of needs. NT, OLB, ILB, Slot WR, PR, and gadget play guy…lol I’m still for Berry, Hughes, Gilyard, Troup

by Larryemcdaniel on Mar 7, 2010 11:03 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

What the fuck did I miss.

Yeah...but we beat the donkeys like a rented mule.

by Idahochief on Mar 7, 2010 11:23 PM CST reply actions  

Steve ... look! Idaho has you in his tagline!

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 11:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Hey!

Nice one!

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 11:26 PM CST up reply actions  

For lack of an open thread

Steve, upamtn and I just parked it here :)

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 11:25 PM CST up reply actions  

hahaha

seems it is tag and I got the tail :)

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 11:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Touche!

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 11:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Is anyone else bummed that Clark didn't leave the keys to the checkbook with Pioli

with the explicit directions to buy every free agent on the market? After all it is uncapped and if we prevented all of the other teams from getting these awesome players we should surely win at least one more game.

Yeah...but we beat the donkeys like a rented mule.

by Idahochief on Mar 7, 2010 11:43 PM CST reply actions  

Actually no

I have to say I’m the kinda guy who believes that it’s a marathon and not a sprint. Carl’s perpetual FA merry-go-round got on my nerves. Building through the draft is the way I always wanted to see it done and now that we’re doing just that, sure, it’s frustratingly slow, but I can see the promise of it. I still think it’s the right way to build for a consistently strong, long-term future. I’m down for another year or two if it means we contend year after year beyond that. Carl didn’t stand a chance of ever accomplishing that.

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 11:49 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Damn you sarcasm font.

You failed me once again. Now take a lap around the field while dragging Peterson by his nut sack.

Yeah...but we beat the donkeys like a rented mule.

by Idahochief on Mar 7, 2010 11:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Ahahaha

Apparently I’m a bit drunk and slow!

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 11:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Jebus man...

its a school night.

Yeah...but we beat the donkeys like a rented mule.

by Idahochief on Mar 7, 2010 11:53 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm fairly well trained

:) j/k

I don’t have to work until 1:00pm tomorrow

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 11:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Thats cool

People in Idaho party on thursday night so they aren’t hungover for the weekend. Do not attempt to conduct buisness in Idaho on friday since they are hungover,surely, and completely focused on the weekend.

Yeah...but we beat the donkeys like a rented mule.

by Idahochief on Mar 7, 2010 11:58 PM CST up reply actions  

What another nightmare

I haven’t been in school for 30 years and one pops up every once in a while.

Homework OMG

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 11:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Your still relatively young.

Dropping out in the 3rd grade put you at 38 according to my calculations.

Yeah...but we beat the donkeys like a rented mule.

by Idahochief on Mar 8, 2010 12:00 AM CST up reply actions  

Nice one!

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 8, 2010 12:02 AM CST up reply actions  

Agreed

CP didn’t have the patience. What he did was appease and appeal to the crowd. A true Showman and it almost worked if he could have pulled a QB out of the Hat.

  I can wait. On the process to do its work. Anyone that has ever served knows Patience is about the only way to get through it.

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 11:54 PM CST up reply actions  

The sad part is

there’s still a ton of Chiefs fans who expect the high profile FA signings every year.

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 11:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Pavlovian?

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 7, 2010 11:57 PM CST up reply actions  

worse ... some of the FAs they want are downright scary ...

… all I have to say now, though, is two words: Orlando Pace

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 11:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah

I’m still reeling over Julius Peppers this year! My Gawd! Seriously? or Haynesworth last year? C’mon! I’d much rather draft and develop any day!

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 8, 2010 12:00 AM CST up reply actions  

All the...

I hate Dorsey and T-Jax is a bust talk is incredible!

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 8, 2010 12:01 AM CST up reply actions  

Exactly what I'm talking about!

But people are still mad we didn’t go for it.

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 8, 2010 12:04 AM CST up reply actions  

Free agents are a bigger risk than draft picks.

The guy has proven himself in the nfl so he should be a sure thing. Problem is he was working his ass off for a paycheck and now that it is cashed, it is time to retire.

Yeah...but we beat the donkeys like a rented mule.

by Idahochief on Mar 8, 2010 12:08 AM CST up reply actions  

The other thing that gets me

is how many people are down for giving up draft picks for another team’s RFA’s. C’mon! Build through the draft already!

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 8, 2010 12:09 AM CST up reply actions  

now yer talkin' Brother!

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 8, 2010 12:13 AM CST up reply actions  

oh yeah ... some of the "proposed trades" I've seen ...

… “and we ONLY give up a 2nd Round draft pick and DBowe” for … Antonio Bryant? please!

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 8, 2010 12:11 AM CST up reply actions  

rec'd and agree 100%

been saying that for awhile now …

I think it’s a societal problem in that we all want “instant gratification” for just about everything … the I WANT IT ALL & I WANT IT RIGHT NOW syndrome

I would FAR prefer a slow, gradual but effective rebuild that goes on and on and on … within a couple of years, you’re really only replacing one or two “key” players instead of 4 or 5 or 6 like we need to now (more than that, really, but hey … )

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 7, 2010 11:54 PM CST reply actions  

Yeah

In the mean-time, I have a bunch of fun watching some of our AP brethren jump off a cliff when we don’t get the $100million man!

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 7, 2010 11:59 PM CST up reply actions  

maybe this will convince a few of them ...

Emmit Smith (Cardinals)
Ahman Green (Texans)
Jeff Garcia (Browns)
David Boston (Chargers)
Andre Rison (Browns)
Larry Brown (Raiders)
Javon Walker (Raiders)
Adam Archuleta (Skins)
Dale Carter (Broncos)
Scott Mitchell (Lions)
Orlando Pace (Bears)

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 8, 2010 12:09 AM CST up reply actions  

Well played!

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 8, 2010 12:10 AM CST up reply actions  

What is, match the super star free agent with the team that he fleeced on his way to retirement.

How about fans that suffer from free agent dilusions for 500 alex.

Yeah...but we beat the donkeys like a rented mule.

by Idahochief on Mar 8, 2010 12:14 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm sorry, you didn't phrase your answer in the form of a question :)

"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whitlock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!

by upamtn on Mar 8, 2010 12:16 AM CST up reply actions  

Doh!

Yeah...but we beat the donkeys like a rented mule.

by Idahochief on Mar 8, 2010 12:17 AM CST up reply actions  

carry on

my wayward sons

And please be kind to the Ass :)
Goodnight

"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli

by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 8, 2010 12:03 AM CST up reply actions  

G'night JohnBoy!

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 8, 2010 12:04 AM CST up reply actions  

Sadly fellers...

I must bid you all adieu. It’s time I hit the hay.

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Mar 8, 2010 12:12 AM CST reply actions  

chiefs draft

chiefs should trade down with buffalo, cleveland or denver. take mcclain with first then mount cody with first second. imagine the improvement to our front seven. then adress offense line with other second. then take jordan shipley in third round. but mcclain is definitly the one they should be trying to get with first pick

by trentchiefsfan on Mar 9, 2010 4:28 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog! Follow us on Facebook and on Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Some clarity on Peyton's injury
Crennelgatoradebathposterizedrough_small
Brian Daboll: Another Perspective
Dxmcc_copy_small
Why Drafting Robert Griffin Is Not Optional For The Kansas City Chiefs
Stag_20silhouette_small
Weekly Official AP Mock-tastic Thread 1/31-2/6 Post-Senior-Bowl-edition

Recent FanPosts

Small
Whats Your Opinion ?
Small
Former Players
Okoye_small
Setting the Trenches: Offensive Line
Small
The Three Most WTF Moments of the Chiefs Season
Chiefs_logo_small
Need some help, KC trip
9aaaa629560faa267f0a91faca7f420d-getty-135962716_small
Ben Grubbs.
Small
2012 Free Agency & Draft Predictions
Tobias_small
Options At Quarterback for 2012
Small
Nation Wide Mock Draft
Images_small
Flowers vs Carr: 1 vs 2??

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

23247_617116905_1805_n_small Chris Thorman

Headshot_small Joel Thorman

Editors

288-chiefstexans0944_sp_8-15-09_jfs woodman212

Matt_ssv_pic_small_small Matt Conner

Stag_20silhouette_small stagdsp

Lips-rhps_small upamtn

Contributors

Kc_ny_small NJ Chiefs Fan

Phoenix_by_melen_small KaloPhoenix

N1358340181_30185582_5800_small Flowers24

Small Jon Yoon

Dirkness_small HisDirkness

Cassel_small Steve_in_RI