60/40 Split For Chiefs RBs Jamaal Charles And Thomas Jones?
Now that the Kansas City Chiefs have signed Thomas Jones, the question becomes how much he'll play.
Chiefs head coach Todd Haley has questioned Charles' ability to shoulder the load at just about every stop along the way. And at each stop thus far, Charles has proven he can handle it (and handle it well, I might add).
With Charles in the mix, it's a risky move taking him off the field. He's one of the fastest backs in the league and has the ability to break one at any time so taking him off the field isn't always the best situation.
According to SI's Peter King, look for a 60/40 split on Charles and Jones heading into 2010.
I like Thomas Jones, supremely motivated, at $3 million in 2010. And let's be clear about this: Jamaal Charles needs a hard-charging challenger to his job. If both men are healthy for 16 games and playing at the optimum, Charles gets 60 percent of the carries, maybe 260 in all. But Todd Haley is playing the best guy, and Jones will push Charles hard to be that guy.
From everything I've read and heard about Jones, he wont' be swayed by the perception that he's the No. 2 guy in town. He willingly took a smaller load during the 2009 playoffs because the Jets wanted to get Shonn Greene more involved.
My guess -- and this is just a guess -- is that if both players are healthy, that split will be closer to 50/50. With LJ last year, Haley wanted to pound the rock again and again. Now that he's got a player in LJ's likeness, I think he will want to try that again but with a shorter leash if it doesn't work out ala LJ.
52 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
51/49
either one can carry the ball, we just have to not wear Charles down. Jones is going to be serviceable for us but hopefully after 2 years JC is ready to take the rock full time and pound away.
Regardless of who the Chiefs pick at #5 overall, Whitlock will call it the worst pick in the history of the Chiefs. Heres to hoping that #5 pick runs Whitlock out of town.....
I hope it's not 50/50
JC needs those carries. He is a threat to go all the way on any given handoff.
Thomas Jones, I think, should just be in for short yardage, goal line, and to give JC a breather.
I would say if we carry the ball as a team 35 times it would be. JC-20 TJ-10 3rd string/FB-5
"Its going to be a challenge, its going to feel like forever, and there will be difficulties. But we will emerge on the other side of it stronger than we were when we entered." ~ Sudden
by Matt_Grbac on Mar 15, 2010 10:00 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
we ran alot of trick plays last year
remember Castilles throw/interception, and JC’s flea flicker. I could see this year a more traditional run set with Jones like you said on short yardage and goalline, and JC tearing it up the field.
Regardless of who the Chiefs pick at #5 overall, Whitlock will call it the worst pick in the history of the Chiefs. Heres to hoping that #5 pick runs Whitlock out of town.....
It would be nice to get them both on the field at the SAME TIME.
Like a Mr. Inside/Mr. Outside thing, except both can go inside or outside! I believe we have the top RB team heading into 2010.
Cry Havoc! And let slip the Chiefs Defense of War!!!
Yep, I see that happening frequently throughout the season. It gives us flexability.
I would love to see JC motioned out, sent deep and just see if anyone can keep up with him…. He’s gotta be able to catch it though.
Fact. Bears eat beets. Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica.
by BigRedChief on Mar 15, 2010 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions
He has decent hands I believe.
He had a long reception this past year against the Chargers I want to say…
Cry Havoc! And let slip the Chiefs Defense of War!!!
by nateforchiefs on Mar 15, 2010 10:17 AM CDT up reply actions
I would like to see them take a shot deep with him on the 1st few downs of the game.
Fact. Bears eat beets. Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica.
by BigRedChief on Mar 15, 2010 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions
If they're BOTH on the field
Fake a hand off to TJ inside and then a swing pass to JC, or have him running a straight route splitting the safetys.
Cry Havoc! And let slip the Chiefs Defense of War!!!
by nateforchiefs on Mar 15, 2010 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions
or send him deep and toss it to the reciever who is undoubtably open.
Fact. Bears eat beets. Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica.
by BigRedChief on Mar 15, 2010 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions
How about send them both out on swing route from the backfield?
Let Cassell pick his target, the safetys will place close to guard against that and then have Chambers go deep. Its pick your poison at that point.
Cry Havoc! And let slip the Chiefs Defense of War!!!
by nateforchiefs on Mar 15, 2010 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions
I think our offense will be fun to watch next year.
Fact. Bears eat beets. Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica.
by BigRedChief on Mar 15, 2010 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions
Agreed. Now if only our D can be bearable to watch next year.
Cry Havoc! And let slip the Chiefs Defense of War!!!
by nateforchiefs on Mar 15, 2010 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions
If we take Berry and maybe Cody I think it will be.
Fact. Bears eat beets. Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica.
by BigRedChief on Mar 15, 2010 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions
Man
Cassel would hold the ball like 3 minutes trying to decide who to throw to…lol
"Its going to be a challenge, its going to feel like forever, and there will be difficulties. But we will emerge on the other side of it stronger than we were when we entered." ~ Sudden
by Matt_Grbac on Mar 15, 2010 10:27 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I think it will be purely a situational thing....
I don’t think they will go into any game saying “We better get JC his 15-20 touches and TJ his 10-15.” I think it will go more like “Well we will start out JC on the first series and if he can get it going early then we stick with it but if he is starting slow then we put TJ in to see what he can grind out.” The great thing is that now we have the tools to make ADJUSTMENTS and change gameplans if needed.
Fact. Bears eat beets. Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica.
Agreed 100%
"Its going to be a challenge, its going to feel like forever, and there will be difficulties. But we will emerge on the other side of it stronger than we were when we entered." ~ Sudden
by Matt_Grbac on Mar 15, 2010 10:16 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I agree
I think JC can hit 100 yds on less than 15 carries in most games. That’s great, but it doesn’t give Haley the option to eat up the clock on offense like he’d want. We have to be able to wear defenses out and that’s why TJ will probably receive a majority of the carries this year. (Not to mention the fact that we want JC to be around for several years) It’s not about who Haley likes better, it’s about better time management and keeping opposing offenses off the field.
agree
if we can get our cake and eat it too
"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 15, 2010 7:15 PM CDT up reply actions
Short yardage
I think you utilize Charles thoughout and use Jones in short yardage situations. I think Weis will be very creative with both running backs.
Why would you want to put the stigma of "short yardage back" on Jones?
He is very capable of picking up yardage from anywhere and at anytime.
Fact. Bears eat beets. Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica.
by BigRedChief on Mar 15, 2010 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions
When Charles is busting out big gains every time he touches the ball, Haley's going to have a hard time taking him out..
Especially if Jones is struggling. 60/40 split suggests alternating drives, which I doubt will happen.
And also when Charles is struggling.
Fact. Bears eat beets. Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica.
by BigRedChief on Mar 15, 2010 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions
60/40 sounds right
…but look for a lot of same backfield with Charles split out wide
The reason Haley was trying to pounf LJ so much
was because he knew the offense was terrible. I think they were still learning all their passing routes and stuff and it was easier and less risky to just try to run and hop eLJ could catch some of his old magic. Also the line was terrible and every time Cassel dropped back he nearly got killed, especially early on.
I think with a better team and players Haley will open up the offense a little more.
Please help send my girlfriend to Broadway! Visit http://magonbroadway.blogspot.com/
Yeah the line was terrible but so was LJ, he lost his ability to "find" the hole and with that line it was doomsday for him.
Fact. Bears eat beets. Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica.
by BigRedChief on Mar 15, 2010 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions
Your right
Haley is known for wide open air attacks. Getting the ball down the field as fast as possible.
Pounding LJ was totally out of character for Haley. It says he did it out of necessity rather than preference.
We won’t see a pounding run game with Weis or Haley anytime soon.
"Its going to be a challenge, its going to feel like forever, and there will be difficulties. But we will emerge on the other side of it stronger than we were when we entered." ~ Sudden
by Matt_Grbac on Mar 15, 2010 10:26 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I think its 60/40 right now
I think Charles will get the 60%. But by all means, football is a game of who is competing. If Jones runs off the big ones and gets the yards, i wouldnt be surprised to see 80/20 Jones. I mean look what he did last year. *note: Jets OLine.
Yep I think it will be completely situational.
Fact. Bears eat beets. Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica.
by BigRedChief on Mar 15, 2010 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions
Weis will have fun with this tandem
The team up of these two running backs will give defenses fits.
Igorash
That will be Key - Deception.
If JC and TJ are in the same backfield Weis needs to be creative with plays and looks. The defense would be loading up the box and Cassel could kill ’em.
I think it's going depend on the flow of the game.....and who we are playing.
The Hot man will stay in….. and the other will give him a rest…
Plus… there is nothing to says that could both be in the same back field as a option.
Way I see it...
Charles gets most of the work between the 20s, with TJ spelling, maybe coming in for some 3rd down situations. Maybe they split carries in the redzone, with TJ getting most of the goal line carries…. maybe a 70/30 split, depending on the situation?
I dunno… That’s how I’d do it.
"The first step to penetration... must not be lateral"
-Confucius
Makes sense
Though Charles was very effective in short yardage situations too…I hope Jones can be equally good.
Predictions:
This year will be better
He was effective in hitting those little creases
But I don’t think Charles is going to move the pile by sheer will alone. Need some weight behind those pads in those crunch situations where the back HAS to fall foward.
I’m just not so sure I trust Charles in those situations just yet. But it all depends on the type of plays called, as well. Haley could just as well run a stretch play on short yardage for Charles, which may be more unexpected, increasing the probability for success behind our smallish OLine.
"The first step to penetration... must not be lateral"
-Confucius
by ArrowSpread on Mar 15, 2010 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions
Charles is definately effective in short yardage situations.
It’s just that it seems that most of the time, he gets the short yardage, and about ten more, if not all the way to the endzone. The highlight video that was put up the other day showed at lease two of those. Chief’s lined up with 1-3 yards to go and he hauls off, is past the first down before anybody gets near him, and if they were lucky bring him down ten yards further.
Exactly what I’d do. About 70: 30, with Jones getting all work in short yardage and goal line. I would study tapes of How SD did it with LT and Turner when LT was in his prime and try to emulate that.
That sucks though
I’m planning on keeping JC in my FF league. I need those sixers.
For justice we must go to Don Pioli
15-20 for charles 10-16 for TJ
Scott Pioli will find a way to make NT the biggest offseason priority.
KC Will Trade Derrick Johnson
I like the idea of splitting him wide a bit more with jones in the game....two HB sets...should be interesting
Scott Pioli will find a way to make NT the biggest offseason priority.
KC Will Trade Derrick Johnson
how many years are left on JC's contract?
The reason I ask is that I feel that if we shackle him to 15 carries a game, in hopes of keeping him healthy for the future, he’ll want out of KC. He wants to be the man. He said he hopes to be the offensive player of the year. He wants carries. And using him in a 50-50 or even 60-40 type role doesn’t give him that. (last season, as a team we averaged 27 rushes per)
I hope he sees 18-22 carries every Sunday. He’s earned it. And we’ll be better off for it. Use TJ in short yardage, goal line, trick formations, and just to give JC an occasional rest. But to use TJ more than that stifles JC’s growth and ability to produce for us.
And a 18-22 carry a game usage is not going to overtax a player. That comes out to be 288-352 carries for the season. I think TJ averaged about 21 last year. (331 carries)
by Detroit Buckets on Mar 15, 2010 12:00 PM CDT reply actions
He should be a RFA after this season
most guys sign a 3 year deal if they aren’t 1st round picks.
Personally I think he’ll get as many carries as he can handle. The coaches want to keep their jobs too. ;)
Predictions:
This year will be better
Personnaly I would give him a nice extension to the contract right now
We have some money I think
"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 15, 2010 7:18 PM CDT up reply actions
I guess I don't see TJ being in LJs likenss
LJ = 6’ 1" and 230 lbs(probably more after a few chicken nuggets)
TJ = 5’ 10"(standing on a ladder) and 212 lbs(soaking wet).
TJ is tough but he is no punishing runner like LJ could be in his prime. In addition, TJ is now well over 30 and will not be looking to dish out, rather he will be avoiding direct contact where possible. These two will not qualify as thunder and lightening, probably more like the quick and the almost dead. TJ was never a finesse back to begin with so he is a North South runner more than Charles. That is it. He is not like the BUS who could bang on guys with his size.
Thank you!
I mentioned this before the TJ signing. I really wanted a BIG power runner that could plow through people on 3rd and short and in goal line scenarios to compliment JC. TJ is simply not that guy at all. And like you pointed out TJ is not the big back people keep trying to portray him to be, using the LJ comparison. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if JC comes into camp this season weighing more than TJ. He’s had a year to add muscle since the last weigh-in. And truth be told, prior to the last 2 seasons behind a great O-line, TJ has struggled to punch it in for 6 his entire career.
by Detroit Buckets on Mar 15, 2010 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions
We can get that guy real cheapin the 5th or possibly on our roster already
Seems Pioli could sign a Thunder anytime he wants to if he wants to.
"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 15, 2010 7:20 PM CDT up reply actions
The 2 RB sets will also increase the pass protection massively.
After they get used to guarding TJ & JC on swing passes, short options and runs, then we work in the play action passes, and the fake handoffs where the RB will actually stay back and pass protect while the WR burn down field and get open over the top on single coverage.
Cassel gets all day in the pocket and the WR’s have all day to get open. Booyeah.
by Your_Moms_Boyfriend on Mar 15, 2010 12:12 PM CDT reply actions
Carry split ratios are like mock drafts
They are purely speculation until you are looking at past game stats. I think Weis will find the best way to manage their use, both for the short term and long term.
As we noticed at the end last season, there are two ways to wear a defense down. You can pound them in inside (happen to us alot) and you can make them run sideline to sideline, which also affects how far they can straight penetrate in to the backfield before over-pursuing and getting torched by Charles in Charge. (as we did the last half of the season). I think we have the guys to do a little of both. Jones isn’t the biggest guy, but he undeniable is a very physical runner that makes a lot of contact. We are all starting to see what Charles is.
So maybe we put Charles out, make them running sideline to sideline every play, then tag in Jones to spell and beat them up a little, then go back to Charles and just start burning them up.
Meh, what do I know though…
Member of the Eric Berry Fan Club
by jakethesnake27 on Mar 15, 2010 12:24 PM CDT reply actions
I say 65-35
JC needs more carries because he is explosive almost every play. The more he touches the ball the higher chance he hauls in a big run. TJ would be a good third down option and goal line runner. Of course he can still come in on some first down situations to mix it up a little. Either way, we have one hell of a backfield that I can’t wait to see in action.
Jamaal Charles...Enough said.
I say run 65-35. Especially if we dont draft a slot in the first 3 rounds
Give Jones 13-15 carries, Give Charles 15-25 carries, Smith 2-6 carries.
You know how you dont drop passes or throw picks……You dont pass the football!!!
Which with a Lilja pick up that we can hear sometime before 24 comes on, might make not passing possible
70/30 - 80-20
put jones in as a 3rd and 2 guy, blocker, and decoy. As someone said earlier, Jones is really too small to be a thunder back for us, and that’s why I was not a fan is signing him. Also, I think the people who say Charles can’t be an every down back are just wrong. He has absolutely proven that he can be an every down back AND field kicks (though I dont endorse continuing to do this). After he busts through a hole and jets for 70 yards, he might need a breather for a few plays, and this is where Jones comes in as a rusher. Otherwise, let Charles carry the load like he’s proven he’s capable of.
70/30
I would start the game with Jones and pound it.He isnt the biggest but he is a very stong and powerful running back.Then switch to Charles at the end of a game to slash a wore down D.I love Charles as the whole package but at that size he needs to be used at the right times.If you think Charles can take 30 touches a game your crazy,that or you dont care how long he playes.I would want to make sure Charles got 10-15 touches,maybe 8 runs and 5 passes.If we get behind in a game his touches can go up as needed.

by 
























