Scott Pioli's Press Conference: Part One
The Scott Pioli press conference is still being transcribed by yours truly, but I at least wanted to get what I have so far out there for all of you to read. It's hard to get many questions in when there are so many striving to get a piece of the action, so the only direct question I was able to ask was the second one listed here about Weis and Crennel's involvement in the draft process. But here's the Part One of today's press conference:
Opening Remarks: Welcome to Indy. It's good to be back in Indy. People are complaining about the cold already. It's good to be back here. It's a great time to year to be here and it's also nice to be able to walk back here for the first time in I don't know how many years in Indy and not be cursed at by Colts fans. Obviously I'm making progress.
Q: Can you talk about the interest in resigning your own unrestricted free agents and, specifically, Chris Chambers, Mike Vrabel and Mike Brown?
A: We've had conversations with all of our players, including those three and some other restricted free agents, too. I don't know if you saw, but yesterday we got Matt Gutierrez and Kolby Smith done. We've had conversations with all of them, but we're talking to most of our free agent players and we want to keep some of them. That's a big part of free agency - not only going out and signing new guys, but it's trying to hold on to the ones you want to keep here as well.
Q: But particularly those three guys?
A: We've had conversations with a lot of our free agents. You know I don't get into specifics of who we talk to and what we talk to them about. Those are private conversations. That's a great way to start. [Laughs]
More after the jump:
Q: With the new coordinators -- Charlie Weis and Romeo Crennel -- how much of a role do they play in the draft process?A: All of our coaches have input on the draft process. Our coaches, our college director, our pro director including the coordinators. Something I've talked about here recently... we had a very good coaching staff last year. I think the dynamics have changed a little bit this year where we're now dealing with a couple new coaches that are coming from a system we've all worked in and they're looking for very similar players instead of the old system looking for players to adjust to the system, we're looking for the same type of players. And they'll be very involved in the whole process.
Q: To follow up on that, what made you bring Crennel back?
A: Well, we'd talked to Romeo a little bit last year and his personal situation had forced him where he wanted to stay out of coaching. We talked about it. We entertained it. This year came back around and any opportunity we have with our football team whether it be with the players or the coaches or the scouting staff -- in any way, we're going to do that. Romeo was available. Romeo wanted to be with us. It sounds like a good marriage:
Q: Tight end was always a position of depth for you in New England. Can you talk about this year's tight end crop and Jermaine Gresham a year after losing Tony Gonzalez?
A: It's a pretty strong tight end group. It's a pretty strong draft overall. It's a good group of players and the tight end position, there's a number of players that we'll be talking to that we've done a lot of work on. Tight end is definitely one of the many positions we need to get better at this year and improve the talent -- both the frontline talent and the depth.
Q: Are you putting more emphasis on the draft than ever before with the uncapped year coming up?
A: I don't think I've ever thought of it in that context. We put a lot of emphasis on the draft every year because I think it's one of the most efficient ways to improve your football team. You want to use every vehicle available to improve your football team -- unrestricted free agency, restricted free agency, the waiver wire, the draft. The core of your team and the youth of your team is through the draft, so that doesn't make any difference from any other year.
Q: How active do you imagine you'll be in free agency this year?
A: We were active last year. What happens is sometimes you try to be active and you don't always get deals done. We're going to try to improve our team and supplement the team with free agents this year as we did last year. So we will be involved with free agency, absolutely.
Q: What are you putting the most weight on at this combine -- the interview process, the workouts?
A: It seems to shift from year to year. There's this cat-and-mouse game that goes on, I think, between what we're trying to do and what the players are trying to do in terms of their preparation and the agents preparing them. The interviews used to be a very important part of this process. They're not as important because a lot of the players and agents have spent a lot of money and time preparing for every question under the sun, every circumstance and every stress level imaginable. So I don't think there's any one thing...
One of the most important things probably now is that you can get every one in one place and take a look at them physically and see what their health is like and conduct thorough physicals and have all of the doctors see them in one place. All of the other things have a degree of importance, but as this thing has changed, the players and the agents have taught themselves that they need to prepare for this event.
Q: Because of that, do you think there's less authenticity in the interviews?
A: It depends on the individual. There's a number of interviews where you get the authentic individual and you get the real person. Then there are ones that are scripted. That becomes a part of the process that you have to filter through and sift through as much of that as you can. Many other times of the year and the season are more important in getting to know the players and who they are. I don't think they're trying to be duplicitous in any way with intentional malice. They're trying to look good. That's their job.
65 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Huh?
We were active last year
Bobby Engram, Zack Thomas, Mike Goff…who am I forgetting?
"I've only been in love with a beer bottle and a mirror" - Sid Vicious.
by craig in calgary on Feb 25, 2010 2:54 PM CST reply actions
tons of players...
The Chiefs were def active…just didnt hit on many
by Larryemcdaniel on Feb 25, 2010 2:55 PM CST up reply actions
ashlie lele whatever his name is, bobby wade,amani toomer,
I LOVE MY CHIEFS
by kcchiefsfan515 on Feb 25, 2010 2:58 PM CST up reply actions
"you try to be active and you don't always get deals done"
His definition obviously includes talking to players that may not wind up signing with your team. cough Haynesworth*cough*
This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.
by KCSatchmo on Feb 25, 2010 3:01 PM CST up reply actions
Monty Beisal, Corey Mays, Travis Daniels, 2 guys off the Pats practice squad, mike brown
Draft prediction top 10 - 1. Bradford 2. Suh (Chiefs trade up) 3. McCoy 4. Claussen (trade Campbell to Carolina, trade for J Brown) 5. Okung (Detroit) 6. Berry 7. Hayden 8. Campbell 9. Davis (Bills trade for Vick) 10. Morgan (Jags draft Tebow in 2nd round) 2/23/09
by I_Bleed_Red. on Feb 25, 2010 3:01 PM CST up reply actions
ohh...
and don’t forget about Sean Ryan or that shitty center from Cinci. Didn’t we sign some other TE as well?
Draft prediction top 10 - 1. Bradford 2. Suh (Chiefs trade up) 3. McCoy 4. Claussen (trade Campbell to Carolina, trade for J Brown) 5. Okung (Detroit) 6. Berry 7. Hayden 8. Campbell 9. Davis (Bills trade for Vick) 10. Morgan (Jags draft Tebow in 2nd round) 2/23/09
by I_Bleed_Red. on Feb 25, 2010 3:08 PM CST up reply actions
The next sentence is the key:
What happens is sometimes you try to be active and you don’t always get deals done.
The Chiefs were the most active in FA heading into training camp
Numbers wise.
by Joel Thorman on Feb 25, 2010 3:02 PM CST up reply actions
Ya but
As per the names the last 6-7 posters mentioned, I’d rather be alot less active
If being active means signing Engram, Thomas, Goff, Lelie, Wade, Toomer, Beisel, Mays, Daniels, Brown and a bunch of Patriots practice squad scrubs, I’d rather not be active.
"I've only been in love with a beer bottle and a mirror" - Sid Vicious.
by craig in calgary on Feb 25, 2010 3:05 PM CST up reply actions
I don't get it
what does it hurt to take a look at guys just as long as you don’t invest much?
This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.
by KCSatchmo on Feb 25, 2010 3:06 PM CST up reply actions
But what good did it do?
His words:
We’re going to try to improve our team and supplement the team with free agents this year as we did last year
What he did “last year” didn’t improve our team any (via free agency)
"I've only been in love with a beer bottle and a mirror" - Sid Vicious.
by craig in calgary on Feb 25, 2010 3:10 PM CST up reply actions
But how can you approve if you dont take chances?
Just b/c you sign a big player doesnt mean your going to improve ..
Chambers and O'Cal
were both FAs.
This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.
by KCSatchmo on Feb 25, 2010 3:11 PM CST up reply actions
If you're only willing to look at slam dunk sure fire guys
you wind up not looking at anybody.
This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.
by KCSatchmo on Feb 25, 2010 3:12 PM CST up reply actions
*nobody
This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.
by KCSatchmo on Feb 25, 2010 3:13 PM CST up reply actions
Geez.
Everyone jump down my throat.
The question was how active he was going to be in free agency this year. Chambers O’Call and whatnot were cuts during the season, not during free agency.
If he’s going to pick up scrubs all offseason looking for gold, fine, go nuts. I just was saying the list I posted above contributed next to nothing to the 2009 Chiefs.
"I've only been in love with a beer bottle and a mirror" - Sid Vicious.
by craig in calgary on Feb 25, 2010 3:17 PM CST up reply actions
Nobody is jumping down your throat
Just wondering what harm was done. It’s not like we dumped multi year contacts on these guys like Kendrell Bell…Napolean Harris…Sackintosh..etc etc etc.
we turned over a bunch of stones and found 2 gems (Chambers and O’Cal)
A good ST player who unfortunately had to start (Mays)
and a good backup who wound up starting when everyones mancrush pissed off teh staff and got cut (Brown)
This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.
by KCSatchmo on Feb 25, 2010 3:20 PM CST up reply actions
Well who were they supposed to get?
It was pretty slim pickings last year. Not sure what great FA’s they didn’t land that would have been difference makers unless they wanted to pay $100 million to an underachieving Albert Haynesworth.
Top of my head...
Matt Birk or Jason Brown, Bart Scott, Brian Dawkins, Vernon Carey…Igor Olshansky
Chiefs have been really cheap the last 7 years
I’ll have a fan post up in the next few days with proof. As a season ticket holder, it’s depressing.
yeah they might of been active
but only a few helped out
You're a goddamn quarterback! You know what that means? It's the top spot, kid. It's the guy who takes the fall. It's the guy everybody's looking at first - the leader of a team - who will support you when they understand you. Who will break their ribs and their noses and their necks for you, because they believe. 'Cause you make them believe. That's a quarterback.
--- Any given sunday
Cassel can lead us.
I knew it
We WILL draft a TE…. I would hope for Aaron Hernandez from Florida…..I cant wait for the draft!!
"Its going to be a challenge, its going to feel like forever, and there will be difficulties. But we will emerge on the other side of it stronger than we were when we entered." ~ Sudden
+1 on Hernandez, he is really good
But… I would really like to have Gresham
by readANDgold58 on Feb 25, 2010 3:03 PM CST up reply actions
I don't want 6'3" TE
He better be 6’5-6’6’ and can block and catch.
Doesnt matter
Lots of good TE at 6’3
"Its going to be a challenge, its going to feel like forever, and there will be difficulties. But we will emerge on the other side of it stronger than we were when we entered." ~ Sudden
Dallas Clark is 6'3 and he's alright
"I've only been in love with a beer bottle and a mirror" - Sid Vicious.
by craig in calgary on Feb 25, 2010 3:06 PM CST up reply actions
Actually
Dustin Keller 6’2
Dallas Clark 6’3
Owen Daniels 6’3
Chris Cooley 6’3
Aaron is actually 6’2 but is the same size as Dustin Keller
"Its going to be a challenge, its going to feel like forever, and there will be difficulties. But we will emerge on the other side of it stronger than we were when we entered." ~ Sudden
Did you not read
Tight end is definitely one of the many positions we need to get better at this year and improve the talent — both the frontline talent and the depth.
"Its going to be a challenge, its going to feel like forever, and there will be difficulties. But we will emerge on the other side of it stronger than we were when we entered." ~ Sudden
Doesn't necessarily mean through the draft though.
Don’t get your hopes up too high. He may get someone from FA or a trade.
no
pioli likes to draft them
"Its going to be a challenge, its going to feel like forever, and there will be difficulties. But we will emerge on the other side of it stronger than we were when we entered." ~ Sudden
He would and did
2004 – Ben Watson
2005 – Andy Stokes
2006 – David Thomas
This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.
by KCSatchmo on Feb 25, 2010 3:25 PM CST up reply actions
He also rated
as a 2nd rounder. Don’t think many of us would be to happy taking a TE in the 2nd. 3rd maybe, 4th or later would be great.
He wont go in 2nd
but i would spend a 3 on him
"Its going to be a challenge, its going to feel like forever, and there will be difficulties. But we will emerge on the other side of it stronger than we were when we entered." ~ Sudden
Please wit till the 5th to take a TE.
we have more critical needs then to use a 2nd or 3rd rounder on a TE. There are several TE and we should be able to get someone like Quarless or Byham in the 5th. Peek would be nice but I think he goes before the 5th.
i think if we can get a good enought tight end id be ok with the 2nd rd
but he would have to be pretty damn good
You're a goddamn quarterback! You know what that means? It's the top spot, kid. It's the guy who takes the fall. It's the guy everybody's looking at first - the leader of a team - who will support you when they understand you. Who will break their ribs and their noses and their necks for you, because they believe. 'Cause you make them believe. That's a quarterback.
--- Any given sunday
Cassel can lead us.
No Joke!
God I love this site. Facts, Conjecture, LOTR references. Always got something I can read to make my cube less soul crushing for the 8 hr’s I have to be here.
by BucktheFroncos on Feb 25, 2010 3:13 PM CST up reply actions
Do your employers worry about your production during the combine and draft? lol jk
"Its going to be a challenge, its going to feel like forever, and there will be difficulties. But we will emerge on the other side of it stronger than we were when we entered." ~ Sudden
Rec Matt
good read and now on to the 2nd part :)
"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 25, 2010 6:17 PM CST up reply actions
You know what
reading the COMMENTS of this post irritated the crap out of me for a couple of reasons.
We were active last year. What happens is sometimes you try to be active and you don’t always get deals done.
Alot of you picked apart those sentences and claimed we “werent active in FA” and we “did nothing to improve the team”
Let me requote..
We were active last year. What happens is sometimes you try to be active and you don’t always get deals done.
We dont hear about every player we try to bring to KC. I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again. 1 call to an agent, agent talks to player, agent calls KC back and says “My client has 0 interest in playing for your team”. Not EVERYTHING makes it to the media despite what many of you may think.
Seriously..the quality of the players brought in may not have been great. Goff being the worst of them. But I dont think Goff was much worse than Jones was the year before. Goff came in, helped mentor some of those interior linemen and Wade Smith really played well when he stepped in. Yeah, he had his bad games, bad plays and everything. But he WAS an improvement over both Goff and Jones. I’m not saying Smith doesnt need to be upgraded..but Smith is better than he was and I believe Goff has alot to do with that.
Engram didnt work out well. O’Call worked out great, IMO. Who cares? MOST of those guys were signed to short term, cheap deals. We had PLENTY of money to spend last year..but offering more money than a player is worth just to bring him to KC isnt a great idea either.
Somebody up there was talkin about “Spending some real money to outbid a team for a player”. He was talking about last year how we didnt try to outbid a team for Jason Brown who ended up becoming the highest paid C in the league. WHY would we do that and throw too much money into 1 player. Thats less money that could be put into other players who are actually worth every dime. I’m not saying Brown doesnt deserve his money..I’m just saying we’ve been at a point where our OL was stacked and yes..it gave us a great offense but how many playoff games did we win?
My main point was..none of us know what happens in Pioli’s office, on Pioli’s calls, or anything like that. We dont hear about every call, every rejection. Sometimes, players just DONT want to play for certain teams. Maybe they have other wants/needs aside from money.
As far as team improvements, I know that we won 4 games compared to 2, had ALOT of changes on both sides of the ball, and are in a good position heading into next season. I know we had some “improvements” that didnt work out but we had a couple that did. I’d be thrilled to find 2 more good starters in FA this year. That combined with the draft + coaching changes and a year in the system for existing players..I’d say we’ve definitely improved since Haley/Pioli have been here.
To those who think that Pioli “wasnt active” or didnt “improve the team” What do you expect? Do you want Pioli to provide you a list of players he tried to get and a reason why he was unable to get them?
by Petey14 on Feb 25, 2010 8:29 PM CST reply actions 3 recs
Yes
I would like to see the list. Of course I don’t expect too.
The Chiefs have been ridiculously cheap when it comes to player salaries over the last 7 years. I’ll have a fanpost with proof about it coming soon.
Forgive me for not assuming that the Chiefs made an effort to sign non-dirt-cheap FA’s, when we didn’t, you know, actually sign one.
And please, explain to me WTF is wrong with outbidding someone for a high quality young FA OL? Please? You know, someone always has to outbid someone else, that’s the way it works, why shouldn’t the Chiefs outbid the F8cking Rams?
It absolutely floors me when I hear Chiefs fans say things like "WHY would we do that and throw too much money into 1 player." Uhh…because we spend less on salaries than practically any other team! That’s why. We also have a GAPING hole at Center.
I’ll save the rest for my fanpost, but you know, when the Hunt’s pocket however much they pocket, you don’t personally see any of the remainder of what they didn’t spend on Jason Brown. Just looking at his case in particular, for example, maybe Clark made $50 mil last year, and if he had signed Brown, he’d have made $38. Sorry, I’m not getting any tissue out for him.
And please, PLEASE, don’t bring up a cap. We haven’t sniffed a cap in YEARS….ugggh, fanpost coming, sorry couldn’t wait.
Sorry, this should’ve been a reply. Oops.
Yes
I would like to see the list. Of course I don’t expect too.
The Chiefs have been ridiculously cheap when it comes to player salaries over the last 7 years. I’ll have a fanpost with proof about it coming soon.
Forgive me for not assuming that the Chiefs made an effort to sign non-dirt-cheap FA’s, when we didn’t, you know, actually sign one.
And please, explain to me WTF is wrong with outbidding someone for a high quality young FA OL? Please? You know, someone always has to outbid someone else, that’s the way it works, why shouldn’t the Chiefs outbid the F8cking Rams?
It absolutely floors me when I hear Chiefs fans say things like “WHY would we do that and throw too much money into 1 player.” Uhh…because we spend less on salaries than practically any other team! That’s why. We also have a GAPING hole at Center.
I’ll save the rest for my fanpost, but you know, when the Hunt’s pocket however much they pocket, you don’t personally see any of the remainder of what they didn’t spend on Jason Brown. Just looking at his case in particular, for example, maybe Clark made $50 mil last year, and if he had signed Brown, he’d have made $38. Sorry, I’m not getting any tissue out for him.
And please, PLEASE, don’t bring up a cap. We haven’t sniffed a cap in YEARS….ugggh, fanpost coming, sorry couldn’t wait.

by 

























