Under the Radar Free Agent Possibilities: Offense
Everybody's talking about the same few free agents, and rightfully so, I s'pose. This year's FA class is as dull as my 8th grade graduation with a few who will go far and the rest just smart enough to move their tassels. So while we'll continue to read 10 posts per week about the possibility of Karlos Dansby or Vince Wilfork playing for the Chiefs, there's are actually a few other free agents under the radar worth taking a closer look. Our goal here: to examine (in two parts) some guys flying completely unnoticed who could round out the roster well.
It's worth noting before we get started that these guys will not be game-changers, so you shouldn't read this list for any saviors. Some might be special teamers or role players, important back-ups or locker room leaders. Either way, the best teams have quality through the entire roster and scouring the free agent wire for solid bargains and surprises is as important as drafting the right guy in April. With that said, here's some players who could possibly help the Chiefs on offense (defense coming tomorrow):
Chris Redman, QB
Age: 32
Former Team: Atlanta Falcons
Reason for Consideration: The Chiefs are already set at quarterback, so most of us don't think any movement is necessary. With Matt Cassel clearly set as the starting QB (no matter what you think, the second round pick and contractual investment guarantees Cassel another full season under center), any moves are only for clipboard holders. Brodie Croyle is a decent back-up who posted good mop-up stats last year in three games played and people still discuss his potential from time to time.
However, with Croyle's injury history and the unknown quantity of Matt Gutierrez, it might behoove (how's that for a word) Scott Pioli to maybe strengthen the back-up QB position a bit. And Redman would certainly do just that. The Louisville product is a longtime veteran who can handle himself in the huddle and at the position. He's had three seasons appearing in five games or more (to give him a bit of a rhythm) and it's clear he's able to step in quite well. In those seasons, he holds a 21/11 TD/INT ratio, including stronger completion percentages as he gets more experience. The Falcons should resign him, but if the Chiefs make a move at back-up, Redman's a nice name to consider.
More after the jump:
Keydrick Vincent, OGAge: 31
Former Team: Carolina Panthers
Reason for Consideration: The Chiefs absolutely need offensive line help, especially at the interior positions. We've been fooled before by the veteran guard acquisition, so this might be more of the same. But Vincent continues to play at a high level for the Panthers in the running game especially, and could be especially suited for the Chiefs future attack with Jamaal Charles.
Good tackles will have to help cover his lack of quickness in the passing game, so it's important the Chiefs continue to build their line with more talent. But Vincent's large frame (6'5", 325 lbs.) would become a strong asset inside and allow the versatility of Wade Smith to really find its value across the line as a back-up.
Chester Pitts, OT/OG
Age: 30
Former Team: Houston Texans
Reason for Consideration: This is the wild-card. In fact, it's less than that. Pitts' celebrated iron man career with the Texans (team record holder for most consecutive starts) fell to injury last year and microfracture surgery. Plus, he's definitely on the wrong side of his NFL career arc, so let's be honest about our expectations from the get-go. Still, someone with 100+ starts experience and the versatility to play smart football at both guard and tackle has to count for something. Guys like Kevin Mawae reveal the ability to continue to play good football well into their 30s with smart play and mastering technique. For a finesse blocker like Pitts, that's a real possibility to keep going.
Kassim Osgood, WR
Age: 29
Former Team: San Diego Chargers
Reason for Consideration: If we're going to sign any guy from this list, Osgood would be my choice. He made the Pro Bowl last year (and 2007 and 2008) as a special teamer. He's a great gunner on S/T and would immediately make the Chiefs much better in that area. However, on a team starved for receivers, Osgood can also make his name at that slot if given the chance, and on the loaded Chargers, that's just not going to happen.
In KC, however, Osgood could really stand tall - literally, given his 6'5" frame - and in college he was an absolute burner at San Diego State (second in nation with 108 catches). He's had limited success given the Chargers already had Antonio Gates, Malcolm Floyd, Vincent Jackson, Chris Chambers (in the past) among others vying for the ball on an offense that already centered itself around LaDanian Tomlinson. Here's hoping a chance to break out could really allow him to do so.
35 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
OSGOOD
I think he’d be a brilliant pick up… low risk, high reward.
Worst case scenario, you have a Pro Bowl special teamer…
best case scenario, you have a pro bowl special teamer who develops as a WR
* KC now has the best coaching staff in the league
* Pioli will make at least one trade in the offseason, and 2 trades during the draft
* I'd prefer "lightning and lightning" as opposed to "lightning and thunder" when it comes to RBs
* 9-7 is a real possibility in 2010 IF the Chiefs get 4 new starters
Yeah Id love to have Osgood
He will want that payday though. I have been reading the tweets between him and Cribbs on twiter and they have been talking about that money lol
Osgood, Sproles and Chambers all from the Chargers
i would be happy with that.
Regardless of who the Chiefs pick at #5 overall, Whitlock will call it the worst pick in the history of the Chiefs. Heres to hoping that #5 pick runs Whitlock out of town.....
at 29 the development for a WR is over
Don't Fuccop Succop
by chicks_love_chiefs on Feb 19, 2010 6:09 PM CST up reply actions
offense, buddy, offense :)
but, yeah, he’d be a good choice
* KC now has the best coaching staff in the league
* Pioli will make at least one trade in the offseason, and 2 trades during the draft
* I'd prefer "lightning and lightning" as opposed to "lightning and thunder" when it comes to RBs
* 9-7 is a real possibility in 2010 IF the Chiefs get 4 new starters
Today?
Check out my blog on software development:
http://www.turnleafdesign.com/
by Scaryclouds on Feb 19, 2010 3:23 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
I want Gollum. He's got that ring thingy. Which makes it difficult to tackle him.
He is ugly and had razor sharp teeth. He’s a bit of a whiner, but who isn’t in today’s middle earth market. He once played hobbit in his younger years, so he’s versatile. He draws a lot of attention for a small guy. And after his trip to the “fires” of mordor, he is a burner.
Not much of a team player unless you have his “precious” in your posession, but hey, nobody’s perfect.
by krayfish on Feb 19, 2010 1:42 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
who?
* KC now has the best coaching staff in the league
* Pioli will make at least one trade in the offseason, and 2 trades during the draft
* I'd prefer "lightning and lightning" as opposed to "lightning and thunder" when it comes to RBs
* 9-7 is a real possibility in 2010 IF the Chiefs get 4 new starters
Stag how could you miss that reference buddy? :)
ring, ugly, invisible (to hit), hobbit, precious.
hah
Kray – you crack my shyte up.
by Eastcoastransplant on Feb 19, 2010 1:53 PM CST up reply actions
not a fan of that stuff...
* KC now has the best coaching staff in the league
* Pioli will make at least one trade in the offseason, and 2 trades during the draft
* I'd prefer "lightning and lightning" as opposed to "lightning and thunder" when it comes to RBs
* 9-7 is a real possibility in 2010 IF the Chiefs get 4 new starters
Good Post Matt
A lot of people (including myself) look at only getting big name free agents, but as Sir Pioli and Sir Haley have said in the past it is a team of 53. The right 53……and yes I said Sir because they will be knighted if they bring us a SB!!!!
Kray, I thought you said
that you weren’t going to settle for “just a player”. Gollum ain’t all that. He’s easily fooled, and then sulks when the coach benches him. Dare to be great!
We are building a fighting force of extwaordinary magnitude.
Did you write this in 2006?
Chargers already had Antonio Gates, Malcolm Floyd, Vincent Jackson, Chris Chambers (in the past) among others vying for the ball on an offense that already centered itself around LaDanian Tomlinson
Their offense hasn’t been centered around LDT for a couple years now.
"I've only been in love with a beer bottle and a mirror" - Sid Vicious.
by craig in calgary on Feb 19, 2010 2:27 PM CST reply actions
um
Osgood has been with the Chargers for some time. He’s 29. The reason he hasn’t been a featured receiver on that time could be because of talent, but we wouldn’t know because they’ve been focused on LT all through that time until the last couple years when they’ve been so deep with receivers. Read the whole thing.
Where's the Under the Radar NT I was hoping to read about???!!!
Or can’t you get those guys under a radar? That’s the main guy I want to get in FA, a guy who can be a good starter for a year or two while we develop a rookie 2nd or 3rd rounder. The others are interesting and may bring good value.
"If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then give up. There's no use in being a damn fool about it." ---W.C. Fields
DOH!! Missed that!
"If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then give up. There's no use in being a damn fool about it." ---W.C. Fields
Ya know what they say
The best offense is a good defense
"If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then give up. There's no use in being a damn fool about it." ---W.C. Fields
There isn't an under the radar NT
because a good NT blots out the radar.
Air Cassel - approved for takeoff
Always in motion is the future.
-- Yoda
good "under the radar" guys :)
but, yeah… one or both would be nice
* KC now has the best coaching staff in the league
* Pioli will make at least one trade in the offseason, and 2 trades during the draft
* I'd prefer "lightning and lightning" as opposed to "lightning and thunder" when it comes to RBs
* 9-7 is a real possibility in 2010 IF the Chiefs get 4 new starters
HMMM
How about Justin Griffith FB Seattle, he’d be an instant upgrade over Mike Cox except for the announcing.
Chester Taylor 3rd down back from Minnesota.
I’d like to see Watson in KC as much as anyone else, but Alge Crumpler from Tenn is losing his down the seam push, but he still has reliable hands and is still a very solid blocker.
Let Stephen Neal go to MMA we don’t need Mike Goff chapter 2.
Malcolm Floyd
isn’t he also a free agent. I heard that the chargers wouldn’t have the dough to sign him a while back. I don’t know if that is still the case but he would be an excellent pickup over osgood. I would still take osgood though.
by Dbezzan on Feb 19, 2010 5:04 PM CST via mobile reply actions
All these young players have really done us good the last few years....
I get sick of hearing so much about age. I do realize its a factor, but I think we put too much decision on it. We need football players who can play football. If young players won championships then the youngest team in the nfl should win the Super bowl every year. Most players don’t start making an impact at the NFL level until 2-4 years in the league. Most teams do not get rid of these players if they are good(plus many are still under rookie contract). Therefore most of your FA are going be so called “old.” We know they are older…..we should be talking about if they can play or not.
by groundedchevy on Feb 20, 2010 9:06 AM CST up reply actions

by 

























