Chiefs Need To Move Backward To Move Forward And Beat The Raiders
A win is a win. I get that. But there was something that just didn't feel right about the Chiefs' win against Buffalo on Sunday. I responded to the win the same way I responded to the Chiefs backing into the playoffs several years ago under Herm Edwards: "I'm really excited that things worked out for us in the end, but I just don't feel like we deserved it." I get that Buffalo is a better team than their record indicates, but if the Chiefs play like they did on Sunday and Oakland plays like they did on Sunday, I don't think the Chiefs walk out of Oakland with a win.
What's disconcerting is that the Chiefs we saw on Sunday are not the Chiefs we saw the weeks prior. In some cases, it is what it is. Our receivers are who they are. Our pass rushers outside of Hali are who they are. But in most cases, we've seen that the Chiefs are capable of better. That's great news, because the Chiefs can get back on track just by doing the things they have been doing.
And to me, this is a statement game. The Chiefs have proven to the world they are legit, but they need to step up and beat an ascending team. The Chiefs are once again a dominant force at Arrowhead; now they need to prove they can win a tough road game. I believe that if the Chiefs get back on track, they have a very good chance at beating Oakland.
Reduce Stupid Mistakes
35, 30, 40, 38, 35, 37, 92 (37), 50. Those numbers represent the total penalty yards the Chiefs had per game (in order of games played). Note that I have 37 in parenthesis for the Jacksonville game, since 55 of those yards came off of questionable Pass Interference penalties. The Chiefs got rung up for 50 yards in penalties against Buffalo, which is uncharacteristic for them.
The Chiefs can't afford to make these kinds of mistakes. It's not like we're talking about a team that is oozing with talent. It looks like the Chiefs are going to win a lot of close games and their advantage is that they're going to win by playing really tough, mistake-free football and they're not going to hand their opponent any kind of advantage. The Chiefs nearly shot themselves in the foot several times. They ran into the punter after a key stop and got tagged with a Roughing the Passer call later in the game. Both of those plays occurred on 3rd/4th down and extended drives that shouldn't have been extended. You can do that against the Bills and the Jaguars. You can't do that against the Raiders or the Titans.
Third Down Efficiency
I've talked about this for several weeks straight and I'll continue to harp on it because, to me, this is absolutely critical for the Chiefs. For the Chiefs to win games, they have to be efficient on third down. The Chiefs' gameplan is built around draining time off the clock and winning the Time of Possession battle. They aren't a vertical team like the Saints or the Colts nor should they be.
When you're not attacking vertically, your strategy is to chip away at the field. You love those makeable third and shorts. I would venture to say that the Chiefs would rather move the ball 50 yards on 9 plays than move the ball 50 yards on 1 play. The casual fan will suggest that 50 yards is 50 yards. That's simply not true. A team like the Saints loves the former approach because they have the firepower to consistently score points. The latter approach eats up more clock, wears out the defense, and keeps the defense fresh.
Against Houston and Jacksonville, the Chiefs were over 50% in 3rd down efficiency. Against Buffalo, they were at 27%. A 27% 3rd down efficiency rate aien't going to get the job done against a better team. Considering the kind of football team the Chiefs are, that absolutely has to improve.
Better Punting and Special Team Coverage
Joel pointed out earlier in the week that Dustin Colquitt looked pretty good on Sunday. After looking at his stat line, I was actually surprised that he had pinned that many punts within the 20. However, he also had 2 touchbacks. Maybe you can chalk that up to the wind. I don't know. But Colquitt, to me, isn't having even close to the outstanding season he had last year. When you look at his season stat line, he has the highest touchback percentage he's ever had and in only 6 games, he's only one touchback away from matching last year's levels. All the while, his seasonal net punt average is at 37.4-he hasn't finished a season below a 40 net since his rookie year.
And maybe a part of that is due to lackluster play in the coverage unit. The signing of Mark Simoneau leads me to wonder if Todd Haley is unhappy with his Special Teams play. Colquitt stepped up with some very nice punts when it mattered most, but we need to see more of that. We can't afford to continually give the opposing team 5-10 yards of advantage on a given punt.
Risky Game Time Decisions
On this point, I prefer to defer to the experts, so I'm not going to say that it's a problem per se. Haley and Weis are risk-takers. Couple that with whipping winds and I can understand why they'd be hesitant to kick a long field goal. Call me conservative, but in a close game, I think you take the points if you have a field goal within 40 yards and if it's anything longer than 4th and 1. And while I understand the desire to mix things up on 3rd/4th and short, I also wonder if they're trying to be too cute at times in those situations.
I was excited to see Jackie Battle get the ball in these situations. Again, I like Haley's aggressiveness, so I don't want to say this is a problem. But I think there are more than a few people who wonder if the risks we took came close to costing the Chiefs the game on Sunday.
Quarterback Play
Now to inevitably open the can of worms. I really liked the progress we saw in Matt Cassel against Jacksonville and Houston. I thought he took a big step back on Sunday. It was great to see him piece together a brilliant Overtime drive to seal the game and I hope that's a momentum shifter for him. But prior to that drive, he's been shaky this season in the clutch. He had several opportunities in regulation and overtime to seal the game, but didn't. To me, the fundamental requirement in this system is that you make plays when you're asked to and you consistently convert on 3rd/4th downs. Big Ben and Brady operated in similar offenses very early in their careers. They were inconsistent at times, but when they needed a big play or a key 4th quarter drive, those guys were nails. Cassel's goal this week should be to focus on that third down efficiency and if asked to lead a late-game charge, to make some pretty big plays down the stretch.
Because here are a few things I'm sure of: 1) for the next few years, we're probably going to be involved with a lot of close games where one missed third down conversion or one failed 4th quarter drive could lose the game for us; 2) playoff teams like the Steelers and the Ravens are going to be a lot more difficult to move against in those situations; 3) a Quarterback can be "outclutched." Not only does our Quarterback need to step up in big situations; he also needs to step up even bigger than a clutch Quarterback on the opposite side of the fence. If we're squaring up against Big Ben in the playoffs and we're up by one score in the 4th quarter, we better be prepared to outduel Big Ben late in the game, because unlike Ryan Fitzpatrick, he's not going to squander opportunities.
So yeah, strange to say, but the Chiefs' best shot at beating Oakland is to move backward from the Bills game. They need to re-find that momentum they had going into the Bills game. I have no doubt that Todd Haley will get his team to do just that.
138 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
ESPN
On espn they said the raiders were gonna win because they play great man coverage and can put 8 men in the box so they’ll shut down our run game. Their full of shit!
by Dakota23 on Nov 5, 2010 9:12 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
What they fail to mention
is the 8 guys they will put in the box are big and slow. If we break to the outside and have our big, strong WR’s blocking that man coverage – things could get messy for the Raiders in a hurry.
I’m so excited for this game I can hardly wait…. I’m almost as jazzed as I was for opening night vs. SD.
by Ochophosphate on Nov 5, 2010 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions
this oakland game is a must win in my opinion
We lose there could be a huge momentum swing with all the afc west teams we lose this one chargers r getting back their starters raiders r some how putting up big points and denver well they r just falling apart. But this in my opinion is a statement game in the division
FOUR F'S FIND UM FEEL UM FUGUM FORGET UM.
by sexassassin on Nov 5, 2010 9:14 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
I wouldn't put it under the must win column yet
If the game was at home I would say it is a must win. The Raiders crowd will be load and scary in the black hole and we have a lot of young players. These young players haven’t played in a situation like this before. The win would be a HUGE win tho.
by groundedchevy on Nov 5, 2010 9:15 AM CDT up reply actions
I believe it is a must win game for exactly the reason you state.
They need to prove that they can win a tough game in a tough environment. This will be critical if they intend to win in the playoffs in years to come. What better way than getting pumped up for a divisional game that has major implications. Sounds like a playoff type feel to me. This game has come up at just the right time. Time for the Chiefs to prove they are who we think they are.
Dear Haters, F@&Y% U!!! Love always, THE CHIEFS!
So if they lose this "must win" game...
Does that mean their season is over? Does it mean they can’t win in the playoffs for years to come? I’m just trying to understand what you mean.
its not a MUST WIN
its a big game, yes. absolutely. every division game is. every game of the year is because there are only 16 games, unlike the other major sports, where 82 is the least. but its even bigger because these are the current top two teams in the AFC West. its by no means a deal-breaker game though.
Maybe I use must-win game and statement game interchangeably.
I think losing two games on the road already means they need to win this one to really show that they can win on the road. I see it as a must-win, where others will see it as a big game. Perhaps its more of a statement game. Perhaps this team doesn’t care about statements, other than the one their record and play says for them. Perhaps I just hate the Raiders and I think they need a good beating.
Dear Haters, F@&Y% U!!! Love always, THE CHIEFS!
I like what Chip Kelly said...
after Oregon beat USC. He was asked if that was a statement game. He looked at the interviewer funny and said he’s not about making statements, but about winning games.
word!
however, to the rest of the nation, that really was a statement win for that program. if they can beat oregon state, probably going to have them in the national champ game
i never saw it in the first place.
however, it doesnt make either of our comments any less true.
Agree that it is a must win. BUT, MUST WIN FOR RAIDERS!
For Chiefs a win will set up their play off run. For Raiders a loss will set up a desperate series of TRUE MUST GAMES for balance their season.
"You talkin' to me? You TALKIN' to me ?" - Travis Bickle
Yeah...
At worst, the Chiefs still lead the AFC West, with a pretty favorable schedule coming up.
It’s a “love to win” not a “must win”…
the schedules...
The Raiders upcoming schedule is pretty brutal too. Next 4 weeks… Bye, At Pitt, Home vs. Miami, and then at SD. They could easily go 0-3 and in the next 4 weeks after KC.
San Diego has @ Houston, home vs. Denver, @ indi, Home vs the Raiders, and then home vs. KC. what do you think? 2-3? 3-2?
KC has @ devner, arizona, @ seattle, denver, @ san diego.
i think it favors kc.
I agree that it is a "must win" game, but not it teams of this seasons playoffs or future success.
This is a “must win” game if this team is to take that next BIG step in their “Transition to becoming a ‘Good Team’”.
‘Good Teams’ win games against division rivals…
…The Chiefs are 1-0 against division rivals (Chargers) so far and for the Chiefs to stay above .500 they “must win” this game.
‘Good Teams’ win on the road…
…The Chiefs are 1-2 on the road so far and “must win” this game just to get to playing .500 football on the road.
‘Good Teams’ win more games then they lose…
…For the first quarter this season they won more games then they lost (3-1). After three games in the second quarter this season they are a winning team (2-1) but “must win” this game to get above the .500 mark for the second quarter.
If the Chiefs lose they will have a 5-2 record while Oakland will sport a 5-3 record; still good for number 1 in the AFC West. If we lose this game we can easily bounce back and still make it to the playoffs this season.
After seven games this season the Chiefs already have more wins (5-2) then last year (4-12) and only getting better. The future is getting brighter in Kansas City even if the Chiefs lose a game on the road against a divisional rival.
Nice catch...sorry about that.
If the Chiefs lose they will have a 5-3 record while the Raider will still only be 5-4 (.5 a game back).
Nice article Jon
and I agree with most points (especially the third down conversions)
I will bring up this one point on which we disagree
Call me conservative, but in a close game, I think you take the points if you have a field goal within 40 yards and if it’s anything longer than 4th and 1.
Don’t you mean “I think you TRY to take the points”? =)
Ryan Succop will be the kicker for the AFC in the 2011 Pro Bowl
I have to agree with Yoon
I believe we win the Colts game if we don’t kick the onside and take the points to tie the game. If the game is tied or you can tie the game early kick the FG!
by groundedchevy on Nov 5, 2010 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions
My point was that the way Jon worded it, it sounds like Haley is choosing not to take three points, which is not true. He is choosing not to TRY for three points.
Ryan Succop will be the kicker for the AFC in the 2011 Pro Bowl
Ok...
Regardless this is minor details….most kickers don’t miss FG under 35 yards in the NFL…even if they do you have a higher percentage of getting points by kicking then going for it…
by groundedchevy on Nov 5, 2010 5:21 PM CDT up reply actions
Last Sunday, they kicked the winner from pretty close in, and they STILL aimed at the right goalpost.
Bad enough what the wind does to the passing game, but it’s easy to say the kick was a sure thing on your laptop.
It seemed like the wind wasn't as strong at the beginning of the game
Or at least I didn’t think so being in the nose bleeds….at the same time tho I didn’t say anything about a sure thing…I said we had a higher percentage to get points…I don’t think you can argue with that…
by groundedchevy on Nov 8, 2010 9:31 PM CST up reply actions
We should make a prediction thread. I'm interested in seeing if fans think this will be close or a blowout.
Most Raiders fans (obviously) think this will be a blowout. No shocker there.
I eat nails for breakfast, tacks for snacks, and I sh*t nickel.
I hate to say it...
I think they’re in trouble this week. They are playing like a balloon losing air slowly. Most of this I believe centers around their inability to move the ball with the passing game. They have yet to fall behind by 7+ points in a game and once they do the Cassell warts are really going to show. They are headed in the right direction – but I would be shocked if they won this game. The Raiders are rolling and the Chiefs are surviving – not a good mix.
Special Teams
haven’t been so “special” since the opening game. I think this team needs plays to spark their emotion as well. I think they will need to break a return or two to have a shot this week.
Keeping perspective...improvement is 6 wins, but I think 8 is attainable.
Well, the Faders have rolled over the Broncos and Seattle……let’s see if they are for real. Just three weeks ago they lose to San Fran; they have momentum, but just how good are they ? THis game will say something about both the Chiefs and the RAiders; Let’s hope our running game is clicking in the 1st quarter, and that CharlieW has a very good game plan.
by chiefsfan4ever on Nov 5, 2010 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions
By GaryChiefs: If the Chiefs fall behind by 7+, it's likely because Cassel's already shown some warts.
Great as the running game is, I think they’ll need the completions to score.
Can't say that I agree that the Buffalo game is concerning
Every team has off days, this was one for KC. KC was dominant through 55+ minutes of regulation, and they were a D-Bowe drop in the end zone; a DJ Interception; a better 4th down call, and an elbow stopping a few inches sooner from winning the game 27-3.
Predictions:
This year IS be better.
oh, and...
Todd Haley doesn't give a damn about your fantasy team.
i agree blue
In fact I’ll go one further and say we dodged a bullet against the bills, they are going to win games soon, I’m just glad it wasn’t against us. They put up 30+ against a great baltimore D and we held them to ten, and we were a toss up call from holding them to 3. Also it’s damn near impossible to run for 270 yards in a game and not score a rushing td, that won’t happen often. I think Sunday was two tough teams in a brawl and we ended on the lucky side, I don’t think it’s any indication of how this Sunday will go. The Raiders have capitalized early in the last two games on opponents negative plays and turnovers, the Chiefs won’t offer them that so we’ll see how they do in a tight game. My hunch is they will choke.
by just a guy on Nov 5, 2010 9:43 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I was thinking the exact same thing regarding the Raiders
KC isn’t going to play the same game as Denver & Seattle…we aren’t giving them easy points with careless turnovers & poor penalties. Personally, I think KC wins by 10+.
Predictions:
This year IS be better.
oh, and...
Todd Haley doesn't give a damn about your fantasy team.
thats a whole lot
of ifs. namely, 4. they were also only ONE if away from losing that game 13-10.
I agree that it's a lot of 'ifs', and they absolutly were close to losing the game
My point is that KC dominated the game in every way but on the scoreboard, so I don’t see the game as a cause for alarm. It would be much more concerning if Buffalo had been moving the ball at will through the game & we were lucky to win. In fact I wouldn’t be terribly crushed even if we lost the game, because the team played well overall.
Predictions:
This year IS be better.
oh, and...
Todd Haley doesn't give a damn about your fantasy team.
on the contrary..
“My point is that KC dominated the game in every way but on the scoreboard”
I dont know about you, but winners and losers are only determined by who’s ahead “on the scoreboard.”
Fortunately, we were ahead "on the scoreboard" at the end of OT.
Chiefs - back in the playoffs in 2011.
if that is the case then we've been ahead on the scoreboard 5 of 7 times
So again, no need for alarm.
by just a guy on Nov 5, 2010 11:51 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
agreed, however,
his arguement was that we were only 4 “ifs” away from a 27-3 win. my arguement was that we were also only 1 “if” away from losing 13-10. my arguement about the scoreboard is this. games are not won by accumulating the most yards. or by getting the most turnovers. yes, i agree that those things help in a huge way, however, “not dominating on the board” is cause for concern, or alarm as you put it, when you do in fact dominate those other things, as the chiefs did.
Good teams win even when the other guys get more lucky breaks.
But the margin of victory is very small in the NFL. Pulling out the win when Buffalo threatened so many times to end it says a lot for the Chiefs.
On Colquitt,
does anyone know where the average position on t he field KC is punting from compared to last year? KC is moving the ball so well this year that I am certain he is kicking from the 50 or closer much more than he was last year. It is easier to boom a fifty yarder from the 35 and kill it inside the 20 than to pooch it into a corner inside the 5. That is bound to affect Dustin’s stats.
I think that is a big piece of the equation. Definitely Something I've noticed...
Us getting a couple first downs usually has Dustin punting from around the 50 or Our 40. Not as easy to boom a 55 yarder while trying to keep it out of the endzone.
Dexter McCluster's 2010 "Broken Ankle" list:
9/13 vs SD, Mike Tolbert en route to 94-yard Punt Return for TD.
9/27 vs SF, Shawntae Spencer and Travis LaBoy en route to 31-yard TD catch and run.
10/24 vs JAC, Aaron Kampman 2 yards in the backfield en route to 13 yard run.
Everyone
Has “off days”, last Sunday was ours. I’m pretty sure the issues were addressed this week at practice and through film.
The Raiders are due for a loss after the two blowouts they delivered…Luck?
I think everyone can agree, we are a better all around team. If we aren’t, we will lose. The better team will be the victor.(Chiefs!)
"having off days"
is a loser’s way of making himself feel better about a bad performance.
by brand0n84 on Nov 5, 2010 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
+1
RUN DEXTER RUN!!!!
President - Team Colquitt Fan Club - est. July 29, 2010
by ARROWHEADSHANE on Nov 5, 2010 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions
When Peyton Manning has an off day
it’s 25 for 35, 2 TDs, 1 INT, 299 yards
RUN DEXTER RUN!!!!
President - Team Colquitt Fan Club - est. July 29, 2010
by ARROWHEADSHANE on Nov 5, 2010 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions
Really?
So him passing for less than 250 yards on us and no TD’s …
I just had a revelation. By Shane’s logic, Peyton Manning is a loser! o.O
Chiefs - back in the playoffs in 2011.
i think,
he’s saying that even manning’s off day is still pretty damn good.
And what I was saying is that his off day was worse than that.
His off day wasn’t really that good at all. (Thanks, Romeo and our D guys!)
Chiefs - back in the playoffs in 2011.
wrong
When manning has an off day he throws fo zero td’s against the chiefs. His off day still equaled a win, as did our off day against buffalo.
by just a guy on Nov 5, 2010 9:56 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
this is true, however,
the colts are 5-2 (i think, without verifying it at all), which is a far cry from 7-0, 8-0, 9-0 starts that we have become accustomed to with the colts. its still good, just not as good. and they have been playing a lot more tight games than in the past. maybe a sign of decent?
Heh. "Descent."
I’ve felt San Diego and Indy have been declining for a long time. This might be the first time their mutual fall brings them in under the rising Chiefs. But I’ll believe it when I see it.
agreed.
simply stating that everyone wants to attribute last week to “having an off day.” did kc play their best, no. did they deserve to win, maybe. did they do just barely enough in order TO win, yes. is that all that really matters, absolutely. however, dont tell me if they had lost that game that “having an off day” would have been an acceptablel answer to anyone other than their mothers.
"Deserve" to win?
I’ve seen that a couple of times. Yes, as a matter of fact they did deserve to win. They had more points. To me the “off” portion of the day was the play calling and nothing more. I wondered why we even threw it once while watching. Passing was our drive killer in most cases. I think Charlie out thought himself.
Keeping perspective...improvement is 6 wins, but I think 8 is attainable.
the last time i checked,
the offensive coordinator, or whoever the playcaller is, is part of the organization. whether he outthought himself or not, buffalo stopped kc a lot. and kc has more than enough talent that they should have converted a lot of those to continue the drive. i, too, thought they should have kept running, but theres a reason weis is the coordinator and we are not.
You're right the chiefs suck.
They shouldn’t even show up for the game. I mean, if they can’t even blowout the bills..how can they beat anyone.
by fishhooks on Nov 5, 2010 11:12 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
no one said that at all.
simply stated that calling it an off game is nothing more than an excuse. they didnt play as well. its that simple. sugar coating it is for your mother.
I thought not playing as well as we could have is the very definition of an off game? o.O
Chiefs - back in the playoffs in 2011.
wheres the proof its not an "off game"
if you consider that an off game, how do you figure that? the statistics are there the same as all year long.
I'd say converting something along the lines of 27% (I forget the exact number)
Counts as an off game?
We can and often do perform better than that. We didn’t vs BUF. Sounds like an off game to me.
Chiefs - back in the playoffs in 2011.
sort of..
vs the chargers, the chiefs converted 1 of 11 3rd downs, thats 9%.
vs the colts, the chiefs converted 1 of 10 3rd downs, thats 10%.
vs the bills, the chiefs converted 4 of 15 3rd downs, thats 27%.
as you can see, in 3 of the 7 games they’ve played this year, they have been less than 30%. almost half of time, they fall below 30% on 3rd down. not good.
hell,
one could even argue that it was all that far “off.” Their season average this year is like 34%, which is like 24th in the league or something, i didnt look it up. they’ve had two games in which they were WORSE than this game, so no, i wouldnt say they were really having an “off game” when it comes to 3rd down.
The San Diego and Buffalo games were terrible conditions for passing.
Even so, the Chiefs have looked pretty pathetic on 3rd down more often than not… by far. Even after getting 8 or 9 yards on 1st down. Maybe they ought to dial up more of those first down play calls on 2nd and 3rd, ay?
no kidding
Telling someone that their word or phrase is not appropriate when you’re saying the exact same thing is silly. Off game isn’t any more an excuse than played bad. They are both subjective in fact, to some win = played well.
by just a guy on Nov 5, 2010 12:05 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
i didnt say the same thing he said.
he said this was an “off game.” i’m not saying that. at all. do i think they didnt play well, yes i do. do i think they’re better, probably so. however, its nothing more than an excuse. saying its an “off game” is nothing more than making “playing bad” sound better. its an excuse for the team’s play that only someone’s mother will accept as a reason for it. maybe, they aint as good as some people think. that 3rd down stat he tried using to justify his “off game” just isnt a justification when they’ve been far worse twice previously this year already.
The Raiders beat
the Donkeys and noodle arm Orton who have NO run game. They beat Seattle who has no run game and whose starting QB went out with a concussion. Remember what Arian Foster did to the Raiders? Or any team that can run? I don’t care about their past two wins…Even a blind pig will find an acorn every once in a while. Nnamdi has a bum ankle, Miller was on crutches, DHB is a scrub and can’t catch a ball with Flowers on him and if Romeo can get our D to stop Peyton from throwing a TD, I think we can handle Jason Campbell. I can’t stand the Raiders or even thinking for a second that they win. I will puke in the spot I stand if they beat us. GO CHIEFS
He confused Pigs and Acorns...
With Sean Smith and Nuts
It’s forgivable…lol
RUN DEXTER RUN!!!!
President - Team Colquitt Fan Club - est. July 29, 2010
by ARROWHEADSHANE on Nov 5, 2010 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I know...
RUN DEXTER RUN!!!!
President - Team Colquitt Fan Club - est. July 29, 2010
by ARROWHEADSHANE on Nov 5, 2010 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions
If I could give one word of advice to a single Chiefs player this week...
It would be “Nutcracker” and Shawn Smith.
Dear Haters, F@&Y% U!!! Love always, THE CHIEFS!
by Falcon58 on Nov 5, 2010 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
+1!!!
LMAO. I had forgotten about that completely. Funny.
RUN DEXTER RUN!!!!
President - Team Colquitt Fan Club - est. July 29, 2010
by ARROWHEADSHANE on Nov 5, 2010 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions
Not a great football movie, but definitely a funny one. Thanks.
Dear Haters, F@&Y% U!!! Love always, THE CHIEFS!
You fail to mention...
Michael Bush and Darren McFadden. Those guys are the reason Campbell has looked good. How do you propose to belittle their efforts the way you seem to write off all the other playmakers for the Raiders?
RUN DEXTER RUN!!!!
President - Team Colquitt Fan Club - est. July 29, 2010
by ARROWHEADSHANE on Nov 5, 2010 9:47 AM CDT up reply actions
lmao.
but can I get a real answer?
RUN DEXTER RUN!!!!
President - Team Colquitt Fan Club - est. July 29, 2010
by ARROWHEADSHANE on Nov 5, 2010 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions
Look
I know the Raiders have some play makers and they played two good games. I understand that. However, I don’t think they were the quality of teams the Chiefs are. I’m not some football expert by any means but I can’t stand the Raiders and there for will give them no credit for anything. Guess its just the homer in me.
That's the answer I was looking for!
I’ll drink to that! It’s 5 O’clock somewhere.
RUN DEXTER RUN!!!!
President - Team Colquitt Fan Club - est. July 29, 2010
by ARROWHEADSHANE on Nov 5, 2010 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions
Nope...
my bad. (hangs head in shame)
RUN DEXTER RUN!!!!
President - Team Colquitt Fan Club - est. July 29, 2010
by ARROWHEADSHANE on Nov 5, 2010 9:58 AM CDT up reply actions
How about this...
I’ve watched some of those game highlights. The Raiders have had a lot of balls bounce their way… literally. Luck don’t last forever.
Dear Haters, F@&Y% U!!! Love always, THE CHIEFS!
Yeah. It was unreal.
But then again…that dead quail that Fitzpatrick drop right into Berry’s hands last week?…Just Sayin’ …. we don’t win without that little stroke of luck.
RUN DEXTER RUN!!!!
President - Team Colquitt Fan Club - est. July 29, 2010
by ARROWHEADSHANE on Nov 5, 2010 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions
Not fair
When that play happened I saw Smith making little pincher motions with his hands at Fitzpatrick. Being a Harvard graduate, he obviously was worried with “ball” security
by JCharlesFan on Nov 5, 2010 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Not to belittle their efforts in the run game...
…but they are second in rushing offense to who? Thats right, the Kansas City Chiefs.
The difference is on Defense. Chiefs are 7th in the NFL allowing 96.4 y/g while the Raiders are 26th against the run allowing 127.4 y/g.
Everyone Underestimates McCluster's Effect
What we were missing last week was that one “little” thing that sets the defense back on it’s heels and opens things up for us. Dexter does that and we are again going to be without his threat this week. He is a much bigger factor that we all give him credit for being. This will be our toughest game yet.
RUN DEXTER RUN!!!!
President - Team Colquitt Fan Club - est. July 29, 2010
Nice post Mr. Yoon
I like to think the Haley/Weis gameplanning is responsible for getting all conservative with the Bills. We saw that early in the season with Dago and Cleveland. One due to weather (Dago) and the other (Cleveland) due to the type of team they were expected to be. In this game I expect to see some early passes on the first couple of downs. Run pass run or pass run run. Just to mix up our tendencies for this important game. Cassel is being reined in for some reason – poor pass pro and turnovers come to mind. Defensively I expect McGraw to play more for a couple of reasons. He is more of a strong safety who can step up to fill holes, leaving Berry to play centerfield. Also his experience in reading the run game will be invaluable.
Not to hi-jack this thread but,
did anyone hear Haley this morning on Mike and Mike? what was said?
ah!
you snake! bouncin around on me. thanks!
Hey pot...this is the kettle...
You’re black. lol
RUN DEXTER RUN!!!!
President - Team Colquitt Fan Club - est. July 29, 2010
by ARROWHEADSHANE on Nov 5, 2010 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions
lol.
aren’t all kettles?
RUN DEXTER RUN!!!!
President - Team Colquitt Fan Club - est. July 29, 2010
by ARROWHEADSHANE on Nov 5, 2010 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions
i heard him say "that was a big win for us"
Then my office manager called and talked to me for twenty minutes.
I hope that helps. :)
by just a guy on Nov 5, 2010 10:01 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Work interupted
your Chiefs coverage? That’s BS.
Keeping perspective...improvement is 6 wins, but I think 8 is attainable.
i live in Saint louis
Everytime there is something regarding the chiefs on, someone calls and interrupts, it is B.S. I should probably quit.
by just a guy on Nov 5, 2010 11:48 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Your office manager
is a Nazi, or maybe worse…. Raiders Fan?
RUN DEXTER RUN!!!!
President - Team Colquitt Fan Club - est. July 29, 2010
by ARROWHEADSHANE on Nov 5, 2010 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions
Hitler died.....
Al Davis hasn’t been as courteous…..
Dexter McCluster's 2010 "Broken Ankle" list:
9/13 vs SD, Mike Tolbert en route to 94-yard Punt Return for TD.
9/27 vs SF, Shawntae Spencer and Travis LaBoy en route to 31-yard TD catch and run.
10/24 vs JAC, Aaron Kampman 2 yards in the backfield en route to 13 yard run.
do the chiefs
really want him dead? with him out of the way, you never know. careful what you wish for.
Decent point....
….Maybe they’d hire Carl Peterson…..
Dexter McCluster's 2010 "Broken Ankle" list:
9/13 vs SD, Mike Tolbert en route to 94-yard Punt Return for TD.
9/27 vs SF, Shawntae Spencer and Travis LaBoy en route to 31-yard TD catch and run.
10/24 vs JAC, Aaron Kampman 2 yards in the backfield en route to 13 yard run.
he's a moron, but a hell of a nice guy
when KC hosted denver on thanksgiving night a while back, i was at that game. afterwards, we went to george bretts for drinks. peterson and his squeeze came in there. we were all hammered and still in our chiefs gear. he came over and asked if we were at the game. of course we told him, and that was an amazing win. late INT by the chiefs sealed it. so he bought our entire group of like 16 guys drinks for over an hour.
Then they'd be good in the regular season, especially at home, but never win in the playoffs.
I don’t think even King Carl would take a job with Chokeland though.
Dear Haters, F@&Y% U!!! Love always, THE CHIEFS!
Not a must win
And I love the pic and yeah as far as ESPN goes I’ve never heard so much shit come out of one mouth, ESPN hardly ever gives any KC team credit when its due anyway
by Supersexy on Nov 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
That's why...
Mike Golic picked the Chiefs, and had Todd Haley on Mike and Mike. And 3 out of 5 experts on First Take picked the Chiefs, even though they’re underdogs. Just think when they start giving them credit!
any kc team?
given that they dont give the chiefs any credit yeah, but the royals havent been due any credit in a LONG time. outside of that, well, who gives a shit bout soccer…
On NFL Network
I’ve never seen so many faggots vote for the Raiders. Can’t remember who voted for what but not too many people is picking KC. Also we’re underdogs, which means alot of people will bet against us. I’ll be glad to see a blind fan lose thier money because they are ignorant.
Chiefs start 4-0. Yes the colts lose to us.
Cassel will be our QBotF. The hate needs to stop NOW
Motivation is a fire from within, if someone else lights it, chances are it will burn briefly
by CasselKiLLer on Nov 5, 2010 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions
Nice bit of thoughtful analysis.
Of the five factors: Three have been done to death and are either an easy fix or little can be done to help situation in the short run. COACHING OUT OF BOX-Just get back in the BOX. QB EFFECTIVENESS- We have what we have and are getting the most we can expect and You have to admit that Cassel has delivered when he has been asked (Allowed) to produce at crunch time. PUNTING is often dependent on bounce of ball.
Two factors that must swing back in our favor are: PENALTIES; We have started to commit avoidable mistakes at key times and get hurt by the results. The ill effects have been aggrevated by timing and where and when they have occured. ( Oakland will help out here as they can be counted on to balance out any shortcomings we exhibit in this area.) The MAIN key factor in Oakland Game will be 3rd DOWN EFFICIENCY: We can’t continue to expect 3rd and short. With 8 and 9 cramming the line o scrimmage we will see more 3rd and 9’s and 3rd and 10’s. We have to find a way to complete passes over and between LBs.
"You talkin' to me? You TALKIN' to me ?" - Travis Bickle
Yes I'm a homer
But if these teams are so ‘evenly matched’ on talent then it come down to coaching. Do I really need to get into it?
30-17 KC
Hugh Jackson has been a pretty good coordinator for them
And I’ve been underwhelmed by Weis. Still, Hugh Jackson vs. Romeo Crennel, I’ll take Crennel every day of the week and twice on Sundays.
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -Gandhi.
Our Box of Chocolates
Our the team problem we have thus far is consistency. This team on a game to game basis really is like a box of chocolates. You never know what the hell you are going to get performance wise. Sometimes the passing game is there, other times its invisible. Sometimes we have a pass defense, other times not so much, etc.
We are a much improved team; howevever, we will become a good team when we can do things on a consistent basis, such as the consistency we get from our run game. We will need a consistent performance from all of our components on Sunday. You can do it Chiefs, play sound and play smart.
Or performance Weis?
Offensive playcalling has been a head scratcher all season, yet we are 5-2. Some would argue we could be 7-0. Who knows. But yes, I agree, we are a much improved team in a very short time. That scares me, because it makes me think that if we don’t play perfect ball, eventually our weaknesses will finally be exploited. The passing game is number one on the list. Just because we don’t rely on it, doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be functional for those times when we need it. I think our balance in YPG should be 66/34 in favor of running. I’m not sure if our numbers bear that out, but we need to be able to go vertical occassionally to keep every defense we face honest.
Dear Haters, F@&Y% U!!! Love always, THE CHIEFS!
Last year
Cassel threw two interceptions in our loss to them at their house. (Huff) Both of them in the red zone.
Bottom line Up Front
Keys to a win:
1. Time of Possession
2. Clock Management
3. Stick to the Run until they stop it. (Raiders are ranked 26th in Rushing Defense)
4. Play sound Defense (KC not biting on the PAP)
how about...
dont turn the damn ball over.
We haven't turned the ball over much except on downs.
But I agree.
Dear Haters, F@&Y% U!!! Love always, THE CHIEFS!
In both wins over Denver and Seatle
Oakland had the ball 20 minutes more than both teams. As you know neither Denver nor Seattle has a running game. Denver – 53yds rushing and Seattle 47 rushing yards (Rbacks only) That alone tells you both teams went with the pass.
A look at both Defenses
Rushing Defense
KC – 7th Oak – 26th
Passing Defense
KC – 23rd Oak 5th
STATS? blah blah blah.....
Stats dont matter this week it’s Raider week and this is war. We need to go in there and dominate at the point of attack (line of scrimmage) on offense and defense. We have to control the ball on offense, eat the clock. and on defense stop the run and put big pressure on the feeble jason cambell forcing into his typical interception mode. This week please fall on the fumble, we were 0-3 on fumble recoveries. Get it done. We will HAVE to rush more than 3 on passing downs, we get no pressure with 3.
need to take things with a grain of salt…denver and seattle are on their way down. They DO NOT run the ball. Seattle had 3 rushing yards at the first half. Then being down, they abandoned the run. So take this stat, and flush it.
Running back Darren McFadden is healthy and playing like a top-5 draft pick, and the defense has figured out how to stop the run, limiting opponents to 75 or fewer yards in each of the past two games.
Unclear
I guess I was inclear in my post. I continue to read that the Raiders will dominate the ground game and the number of points they have scored in the last two games. Both Denver and Seatle abandon the run and went to the air. Results were Raiders controlled the clock with the run, opposing defense was tired and thus could not stop the run. Enough said. I have a lot of confidence the Chiefs will continue to do a great job against the run. It will be a great game Sunday.
Its going to be a great game
Both teams are relevant again. This fact alone will make this a hard-fought game. Each side is going to pumped more they would be for any other team.
This game scares me a little just b/c it is on the road and, as much as I hate to admit it, the Raiders are playing well, for the most part this season. This game should be close no matter who wins. Should be decided by 7 or less.

by 

























