Jaguars at Chiefs Week 7 Refocused

Has any one seen "Mike Cox?" - Read the article, you'll get it

over 1 year ago cpa913 5 comments 0 recs |

Comments

So we rush for 200+ yard against them

and he trashes our FB as a poor lead blocker? Everything I have heard about Mike Cox has been positive since he took over for Castille. Did I miss something or is this just another poorly informed blogger?

To make a bad day worse, spend it wishing for the impossible.

I've had the same dream every night this week. I think it means that the spring season flopped and my subconscious has gone into reruns.

by chiefsandcigars on Oct 28, 2010 3:54 PM CDT reply actions

They look at every play of every game

and assign a score to each player for how they played that particular play. This is the site that projected us to win the Division in the pre-season, and everyone thought they were a joke.

If they say Cox had a bad game, I’ve got to believe them.

by cpa913 on Oct 28, 2010 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions

well, I'm not a PFF fan

I don’t trust their word as “law”

but, I did see Cox make a couple of good blocks, and miss a couple…

overall, though… when the Chiefs put up 200yds rushing, the OL, TE, FB and WR are all probably doing a pretty good job blocking

It's all about the gameplan

by stagdsp on Oct 28, 2010 4:54 PM CDT up reply actions

Someone on some thread(I know vague but I'm too lazy to look it up)

Posted stats(yards per carry if I’m remembering right) with Mike Cox in the game as opposed to him not being in the game and the stats with him in were significantly better.

"Success is never ending, failure is never final."

by GenericBrand on Oct 28, 2010 6:32 PM CDT up reply actions

I think this is one of the better analysis.

Just because we ran good doesn’t mean the FB played well. I find this very interesting. I wish I wouldn’t have deleted the game so I could have checked them out.

I am curious if the coaches seen the same thing, maybe Castille is back in?

The views expressed by craig in calgary do not necessarily represent the views of all Canadians.

by saskwatch on Oct 28, 2010 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions