Do We Already Have the Safety We Need?
Following todays performance and in the spirit of offseason fun let's take a 'different' look at the holes on our team and a 'creative' solution.
What we know:
1. The Chiefs run defense needs help
2. The run defense starts with the D-Line
3. The run defense ends with the LB's. (read further before you begin your reply)
4. Our NT isn't getting the job done
5. Our ILB/MLB isn't getting the job done.
6. Page needs some help at safetly that will be both a long term, and talented player
7. DJ has pass cover skills, big play ability, and youth
8. DJ likes to roam and hide and use his athletic ability to make plays.
9. DJ roams and hides way to much as a run stopper. He doesn't have gap dicipline.
What you should see comming by now:
As we look back at last season we see Glenn Dorsey, Tamba Hali, and Turk McBride all completely re-evaluated buy the coaching staff. They each, through scheme change or necessity, were moved to someplace else on the field outside of what was considered their natural position. Dorsey and Hali have both made marked improvements over the 2008 season playing in a new scheme in a new position. 2 out of 3 aint bad.
The biggest area of need for the Chiefs is right down the middle of the field. We're soft in the belly and consistently give up yards to both the inside run and the underneath passes and crossing routes. It's fairly obvious that we need to improve play at the NT spot in order to free our LB's up to make plays. IF the RB gets past the line then we need massive improvement with a gap protecting LB that is diciplined enough to stay in their gap and stop the run before it's already 4-6 yards down the field. A safety that can pass protect and put on big hits vs. runners would be nice, but if the safety is making the majority of the stops in the run game then we've already given up too many yards. In base defense the safety should not even be considered part of the run protection, rather just a last resort when all else has failed.
Against the middle pass and crossing routes were very weak at safety. Teams have burned the Chiefs all year by throwing the ball behind the LB's and in front of the safeties. We simply do not have the ball hawk defender in the backfield that makes a break on the ball and makes big plays. Page has been out with injury and we've marched a small batallion of guys in to try and play the position next to Brown all year long. We need Page back on the field, but Brown is not the long term solution for our team. What we want is a ball hawk player that can roam the backfield and make plays on the ball. That player has to have good accerleation (not necessairly top speed) and big play ability to interfere with the receivers and defend the pass in the middle.
With so many holes to fill, is it really out of the question for the Chief's to take a player like DJ (big play ability, ball hawk that makes things happen, shakey against the run, strong agaisnt the pass) and MOVE him to a different position. Given what we know about DJ's abilities and tendencies, doesn't he look to be much better suited to playing that roaming safety we so badly need? I believe it would give us a CHANCE to kill 2 birds with one stone:
Bird 1) A major flaw at run stopping ability at the LB position. A hole so big that DJ sits on the bench on obvious running downs because he simply cannot be trusted to play 'team defense' and 'gap protection'. He's GOING to fall back on his athletic ability and roam the field weather we like it or not. He's already proven this. It HURTS us in the running game, and puts a talented athlete on the bench.
Bird 2) A major hole at safety where we need a field roaming, ball hawk, big play making, pass defender in the middle.
If we moved DJ to the safety position and then concentrated our high draft picks (through trades or spending them) on NT, LB's, and OL would we be better off than we are now? Can DJ handle the safety position? Are we better off with DJ on the bench on running plays, another hole to fill because of it, and going after a safety early draft? What position do YOU think DJ's natural talents are better suited for? With a better NT, a true MLB run stuffer, and a new C and RT are we a good enough team that we can afford a 'struggling to learn' DJ for 1/2 a season at safety?
We need SOMETHING to talk about now that the off-season has officially started. Obviously I have my own opnions on each of those questions (and they would probably supprize you) but I prefer to hear what YOU think.
Let the offseason discussions begin:
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.
109 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hmm...
Putting DJ in a SS position is going to be a stretch. He is more of a roamer which is another reason why he rode the pine for a while but putting him in at safety is really trying to put a band-aid on a broken leg. Sure in the Baltimore game and this game his athletic ability has shown through in coverage but that was only within the first 5-7 yards of the line of scrimmage. Like it or not, DJ would be put in some major pass situations where he may be covering a Antonio Gates type TE or maybe a slot WR in some situations and teams will eat that up all day. Even if the coverage works, he STILL must improve in run support before anything else
by His Royal Greatness on Jan 3, 2010 9:15 PM CST reply actions
OLB
He belongs on the outside.He’s never been put in the right position on the right def.Cover 2 OLB,then cover 2 ILB,Now 3-4 ILB.He’s a DT type.Very athletic,can make game changing plays.So why the hell not use him that way.I think a 4-3 “D” will make a play for him & use him correctly.We will give up on a very good athelete & someone else will get the gravy.Pollard anyone?
John Soellner
I don't understand
.He’s never been put in the right position on the right def.Cover 2 OLB,then cover 2 ILB,Now 3-4 ILB.
What’s a Cover 2 OLB?
What’s a Cover 2 ILB?
I understad the 34 ILB comment, and DJ is lousy at that role. He’s not diciplined enough to pay gap protection.
.I think a 4-3 "D" will make a play for him & use him correctly
A 43 WHAT? MLB? Sam? Will?
He came from a 4-3 defense, and he wasn’t very good at that. He had the exact same issues: poor run defender that was always out of position.
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
Even WITH Jared Allen, the front 4 was suspect.
More solid play from the front 3 in this 3-4 will give ILB/OLB more predictability and freedom to freelance.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
You Don't Understand?Texas Chief
Did you ever watch DJ play?Did you not see that his biggest knock was against the run?Why?Because his atheleticism,& ability to blow up plays was what he was told to do.Give DJ the same role & you could see great things.How good you can be is directly related to where your talents are being used.If Haley & company want to change what he is good at then let him go & suceed somewhere else.Not that hard to understand.
John Soellner
Um, I understand just fine.
Try reading an entire thread before you comment. It makes for much better discussion.
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
What i dont understand is:
What is a cover 2 OLB? — I know what a Cover 2 is, and it has nothing what-so-ever to do with the LB’s
What is a cove2 2 ILB? — this could actually be a discussion if you were talking about a 43 cover 2 ILB. The fact that it’s a 43 cover 2 radically changes the responcibilities of the MLB, but you dont say what you mean.
When you say he’s moree suited to a 43— WHAT position in the 43 do you think he’s more suited for? WHY do you say that?
If you think he’s best suited as a 43 MLB (which I would argue against until I was blue in the face) then back it up by telling us why.
I don’t understand your thoughts, becasuse there are too many things left unsaid. It’s not an insult, it’s a question. I don’t understand what you are trying to say with your comment. I need you to expand your thoughts.
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
Please completely and totally ignore the "Um, I understand just fine" comment..
… totally my bad. I managed to read the WRONG name as teh poster of the comment. I didn’t realize it was you replying to my reply. Somehow i got the names / comments crossed and thought it was someone ELSES comment.
My bad, and my appologies.
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
by the way
there is no gravy with Pollard.
He reminds me of Roy Williams the ex-Dallas safety:
HARD hitter that is always trying to put in the big STICK, but lousy at wrapping up in the open field, and barely useable in a passing situation. Surely DJ is better at pass coverage than Pollard. He’s at least a ball hawk and an athlete.
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
I'll give you the ball hawk and athlete part.
But DJ is fast for a LB, and the problem with this d-backfield is its safeties are pretty much just fast LBs. You see the lack of speed in the LBs more clearly than I do. I see the lack of speed in the safety position.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
So would McClain as MLB help out the all around
Corey Mayes is fine as a Backup MLB but not a true Starter at the position
We Will kick at least 4 Teams Asses in 09. Almost there :)
And Succop will be the Key in two of them. Skins & Raiders! Pittsburgh Sweet!
" Think and talk positive football off the field." Hank Stram
by Steve_Chiefs on Jan 3, 2010 10:21 PM CST up reply actions
I can easily see upgrade taking place at ILB. Not sure 1st round is how to go about it.
In fact, I’ll always be dubious of 1st round LBs and RBs, when I see gaps on the perimeter and the trenches (both sides of the ball) still in fairly serious need of talent upgrade. I include SS/FS in “perimeter player,” same as I view the slot receiver as essentially another wideout. These guys are typically center-fielders, but need to be able to match up on the perimeter, without giving anything away with personnel groupings.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
Berry then Haden
Or maybe Okung then Cody
I really see the spots I posted about before, yet Carr was lit up:(
Makes me think
We Will kick at least 4 Teams Asses in 09. Almost there :)
And Succop will be the Key in two of them. Skins & Raiders! Pittsburgh Sweet!
" Think and talk positive football off the field." Hank Stram
by Steve_Chiefs on Jan 3, 2010 10:37 PM CST up reply actions
Yep. Carr was lit up.
You watch the way that the Jets D can flat SHUT YOU DOWN, and it all starts on the edge, where they just friggin’ single-up the best WRs in the league and bring the blitz.
CAN our guys do it? I suspect they could better than we’ve seen, only they’re not (apparently) coached-up to play it that way. But you watch Revis for the Jets, and you see him STILL stride-for-stride 40 yards down the field, when, for whatever reason, the blitz did NOT strike home.
I think Carr has the speed to pull this off, and the size to play big when the ball comes his way, but he still has some serious un-learning to do.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
Going off of today
Carr got destroyed all day. made a couple decent plays but that was it.
DJ looked like he is really starting to get this D and had a good game, decent against the run, and EXCELLENT against the pass. Belcher showed MORE improvment and looks to still have upside.
Dorsey is the man.
Cox is looking like a starting FB should.
I say next year starters, and returning Backups
QB Cassel, Croyle
HB Charles, ?, Williams
FB Cox (Castille?)
WR Bowe, Chambers, ? , ?, Copper
TE ?, Pope ,
LT Albert, ? On the roster
LG Waters, On the roster
C ?, ? Upgrade needed coaches might have a diff opinion.
RG ?, could be on roster or upgrade brought in.
RT ?, O’Call
The O-Line has been playing much better and the #1 need of this team is now WR on offense and TE then a starting Center and a #2 RB. Competition for the O-Line would finish off needs.
LE Dosey, Magee
NT ?, ? Edwards could return in reserve roll
RE Jackson, Gillberry
OLB Hali, ?
ILB Williams, Belcher
ILB DJ, Mays
OLB ? Studebaker If Vrabel comes back he starts or has open comp with Stud.
CB Flowers, Daniels, Washington
CB ?, Carr
FS ?, Page,
SS Brown, Langford
What I see as Defensive needs are a NT, a shutdown CB, a FS, an OLB to either start on the other side of Hali ro depth if Vrabel returns and another NT for depth if Edwards leaves.
That makes
WR C TE HB positions of MUST fill and WR and depth at O-Line optional or IF possible upgrade.
NT, FS, CB, positions that MUST be filled on D and NT, OLB as positions optional or IF possible upgrade.
You could probably make an argument
For Carr as FS… Much like Antrelle Rolle in ’Zona?
Dunno…
"The first step to penetration... must not be lateral"
-Confucius, in contrary to Glenn Dorsey lining up in the 2-tech
Either of our current starting corners have enough pure football player in 'em to play that role, imo.
Add another coverage ’back to the mix, and either Carr or Flowers could do spot duty at S, depending on the situation. I just like the idea of having more players who can cover manning the secondary. Gives you a lot more flexibility in the looks you can give and what you can do out of those looks. Polamalu is a case in point in PIT.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
I always though he was an outside linebacker
Why would we put him in the middle?
OU SUCKS!!!!!!
by TexasFight83 on Jan 3, 2010 10:40 PM CST up reply actions
WILB in the 3-4 is pretty much WOLB in the 4-3. Just put Tamba's hand in the dirt, 'n' squint yer eyes a little.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
No trade for DJ!!!!!!!!
Keep him he is a play maker it’s obvious!!!!!!
Isn't the kid we got from Philly supposed to be pretty good.
Let’s face it Philly’s draft track record is stellar. Especially on defense.
that's what I was hoping this post was about
I keep hearing good things about him. KC grabbed him off their PS so they could own his rights this offseason.
I’d keep DJ at his current position, and keep pushing him to be better.
I’d try Langford at SS this offeseason… IF he is as good as we think he can be…
next season’s DBs could be
Langford/Brown at SS
Page/ Berry? at FS
Flowers, Carr at CB
Nickle back could be Washington, Leggett, Daniels or a rookie… whoever wins, but you’d hope for Washington, since KC has a draft pick invested, and he’s so physically gifted.
LBs
Hali, DJ, draft pick?, Vrabel/Draft pick
keep belcher and mays as depth and ST-ers
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
* Stats are for losers
Thanks Stag. That's what I was hoping too...
I was obviously way off base though.
by Chiefsfan1970 on Jan 4, 2010 10:46 AM CST up reply actions
Im not very familiar with him...
… fill us all in. What do you know about him?
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
I would probably beckon Stag for that. He seems to know more about him than I do.
But, My understanding is that he is a big athletic Safety with tons of speed and a high penchant for recognizing plays quickly and reacting. Supposed to be a guy who does well against the run but, excels in coverage.
by Chiefsfan1970 on Jan 4, 2010 10:55 AM CST up reply actions
http://www.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=940128
Vanderbilt head coach Bobby Johnson said on Sunday. “He was tremendous here, both on and off the field. Reshard Langford is one of those guys you build winning teams around.”
The four-year Commodore starter registered 169 solo tackles over his career at Vanderbilt as well as 247 total stops. The two-time defensive captain also picked off 11 passes during his career in Nashville, including one he returned for a 42-yard touchdown against Tennessee in 2008. He broke up 19 other passes as well in his career.
A native of Tanner, Alabama, Langford was considered one of the SEC’s most consistent safeties and one of the league’s most feared hitters.
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
* Stats are for losers
he's 6'1" 215lbs, ran as fast as 4.56 40
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
* Stats are for losers
04/27/2009 – The Eagles added to their roster Monday, signing nine rookie free agents. Reshard Langford…A four-year starting safety at Vanderbilt, posted 247 tackles (16 for a loss) and eight interceptions. Was a two-year captain at Tanner HS in Tanner, AL, as a running back and safety, earning first-team All-State honors in his senior season. Born 2/6/86. – Philadelphiaeagles.com
02/07/2009 – PRO POTENTIAL: SS Reshard Langford brings durability, dependability and toughness to the table, having made every start (48) for which he was eligible in his college career. A hard hitter and a smart player, Langford could be a late round pick or a good pickup as a free agent.
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
* Stats are for losers
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/518975
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
* Stats are for losers
Man, Rec when I saw you posted and still Rec on the thought
a 240 lb SS
Makes me think of Tiger Tanks, Do you propose everydown SS or a some SS and LB mix. What do the other premier SS’s measure at the 6’3 is fine but 240 lbs?
We need to find that sweet spot for DJ to excel. Maybe occasionally at ROLB for pure Rush, Predator that should keep DJ concentrated.
We Will kick at least 4 Teams Asses in 09. Almost there :)
And Succop will be the Key in two of them. Skins & Raiders! Pittsburgh Sweet!
" Think and talk positive football off the field." Hank Stram
Or just let him be what he is
a good nickle LB. Covering backs and TEs. He’d get burnt deep repeatedly playing safety.
This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.
by KCSatchmo on Jan 3, 2010 9:44 PM CST up reply actions
The Tiger Tank was an abysmal failure.
Too heavy to maneuver very well – always bogged down in the mud. Over-engineered in some respects, and always breaking down, in need of premium parts that couldn’t be easily replaced. Look for a different simile to make your case. :o)
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
Im not saying he should stay at 240lbs, heh
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
With Johnson,
I think putting him at SS is definately not the best of ideas, though, outside the box. Honestly, I think DJ needs to be groomed and needs to sit at Mike Vrabel’s feet and learn how to properly play OLB opposite Hali. He’d be better suited there, and could learn from Vrabel’s leadership. I think that we need to focus on either a SS or a NT in the draft, so, Either Berry, or maybe someone like Suh. Honestly, I think we should go after Berry, considering the strength of NT that will be available in the offseason. Just sayin’ Anyway, Peace.
by BetterRedThanDead on Jan 3, 2010 9:52 PM CST reply actions
The announcers today was commenting
on how he turned into a RB after the INT he had…Burned a couple guys…..240 LB converted to RB…least you know he wont shy away from contact…..
Im totally kidding BTW
That's not as crazy as putting him at SS.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
Why is putting him a SS crazy?
C’mon hmills, yer one of my favorite posters on AP. You do a great job of not bowing down to anyone and sticking to your guns. So go ahead…BLAST me. Get the discussion rolling. WHY is it a crazy thought?
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
Heh. See below. Not so much a refutation as a statement of my own impressions.
In the above, I was just trying to give KCinAZ props for thinking outside of the box (even if the idea was planted in his head by Dick Enberg after the first Pick- 6).
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
And I gave it serious thought.
Sarcasm font might’ve helped me, there. DJ fits my general criteria for RB measurables: Good hands, tough, and faster than ’most any LB. Close enough to give such remarks serious consideration – more serious consideration than DJ at SS, which, to my twisted mind, is an even bigger reach.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
Also still waiting on your evaluation of Carr
We Will kick at least 4 Teams Asses in 09. Almost there :)
And Succop will be the Key in two of them. Skins & Raiders! Pittsburgh Sweet!
" Think and talk positive football off the field." Hank Stram
by Steve_Chiefs on Jan 3, 2010 10:15 PM CST up reply actions
Haven't I given it numerous times?
Now I REALLY feel like a teacher.
I tole youze guys dis stuff a zillion times, and now youze tell me I never tolt cha.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
I am learning
I want Cover corners we have zero I think
Flowers is good but small, Carr is adequate but needs to turn his head.
Maybe Pendergast is not the answer at DB coach either
We Will kick at least 4 Teams Asses in 09. Almost there :)
And Succop will be the Key in two of them. Skins & Raiders! Pittsburgh Sweet!
" Think and talk positive football off the field." Hank Stram
by Steve_Chiefs on Jan 3, 2010 10:24 PM CST up reply actions
Not a bad summary.
I am also dubious of the DB coaching. We’ll see how the younger guys develop, but if the coaches were gettin’ it done, and the talent scouts had their shit together, it seems to me we’d’ve seen more of Donald Washington from the midseason point, onwards.
Both Carr and Flowers have a problem gettin’ their head turned around – I suspect it correlates with the plays on which they know they do not have safety help over the top. Without the safety over the top, I think they’re both terrified of losing contact with the WR (with good reason). But that’s how they were trained in college and in their rookie seasons. Add to that the fact that they have zero confidence of the pass rush striking home very quickly, so they have no inner sense of when they ought to be lookin’ for the ball.
That Gaffney clown might have been an object lesson for Carr, though. He’s a bastard about not telegraphing the ball in the air. I think Carr’s been working on reading cues from the receivers as to when he should get his head around, and that bastard Gaffney was shrewd about it.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
Explains Chambers eating us up
he is great at giving the wrong reads to CB’s
We Will kick at least 4 Teams Asses in 09. Almost there :)
And Succop will be the Key in two of them. Skins & Raiders! Pittsburgh Sweet!
" Think and talk positive football off the field." Hank Stram
by Steve_Chiefs on Jan 3, 2010 10:42 PM CST up reply actions
Yes, and he pulled one of those off, today.
And shot down my repeated criticism of his poor catching fundamentals.
I still think he doesn’t always go after the ball at its highest point and win the jump-ball, when the defender has the same chance at it he does. But he’s really good at disguising when the ball’s coming, so he makes catches some other receivers wouldn’t. I still think that when the DB sees it coming and contests the catch, Chambers could do a better job of snatching the ball at its highest point, but he’s not as bad at it as I have said REPEATEDLY here on AP.
Hey! This crow ain’t all that bad, with a little Worcesterhire ‘n’ pepper.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
Told ya Gaffney wasn't bad!
Good thoughts throughout.
And sometimes giving up the one thing makes the offense 1-D.
And then you start seeing things like, oh I dunno, pick-6’s from your MLB.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
Carr is fine
He was getting picked on a lot today, but a lot of it was due to the fact that we had zero pass rush.
When we did get pressure on Orton, Carr played well.
Pressure up front (and NOT just from your front 7) is key.
KC could also bring more DB blitzes from more angles if they had one (or two) more great coverage ‘backs to mix it up with. Then they could blitz the corners more often, with a safety rolling to the hot route in the area the blitzing corner is coming from. Greater speed at S makes that sort of thing happen. It also creates uncertainty when you bring that S up in press coverage, because he’s likely to blitz from that position, but, if he can cover, the offense ends up rolling its protections to his side, when the blitz doesn’t come.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
The donks were holding on nearly every play.
Our front 3 would be MUCH better if we could get the refs to call a fucking hold every once in a while.
BTW: Hali OWNS Clady! We will reap the benefits of that matchup for many years to com.
by Chiefsfan1970 on Jan 4, 2010 12:20 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Hali might be vulnerable when that mountain wants to run-block.
But yeah, Hali’s a lot quicker than Clady. That being said, Orton had a lot of time on a lot of plays.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
he did have plenty of time... too much time
again, mills, I kept seeing KC’s blitzes being poorly disguised and easily picked up.
even when they send everyone… they start cheating up, and the offense has plenty of time to pick up their assignments.
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
* Stats are for losers
No argument, here, although they also show it and then drop back.
Disguise or no, there aren’t enough guys winnin’ their matchups. Also there’s a lack of coordination – bad habits from Cunningham’s era perhaps – where it’s every man for himself, and there aren’t enough lunchbucket types like Mike Brown, who’ll take a blocker out of the way of the guys they know are comin’ behind ’em.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
I was pretty impressed
With the double-moves Hali put on Clady… He’s really taking to the coaching, it seems.
"The first step to penetration... must not be lateral"
-Confucius, in contrary to Glenn Dorsey lining up in the 2-tech
Orton did have time but...
Their guys up front were BLATANTLY holding Dorsey and Edwards on almost every play. I made a point to watch the line play very closely when I was watching the game. It was REAL bad! Turning our guys around, slamming them on the ground, tackling them. All the holding that I saw was taking place outside of their jersey #s which, if I understand the rules, that IS holding. The refs just let it happen.
This isn’t the first time I have noticed this. Our opponents ALWAYS get the calls. ALWAYS! If our line had played like that yesterday, we would have set a new NFL record for holding penalties. It was ridiculous.
by Chiefsfan1970 on Jan 4, 2010 2:43 PM CST up reply actions
Hali has been held as much as any player in the league this year
if not more… seems like he gets put in a choke hold or held on every other pass play.
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
* Stats are for losers
I assume an Arm-Bar must be legal
Rule 49. " Think and talk positive football off the field." Hank Stram
I disagree, Texas Chief.
I think he’ll improve as the NT upgrade (and LDE upgrade) ensues.
I think NT is the main thing that set him back. I think WOLB is a good spot for him, once the pieces are in place. He’s not playing the game under the conditions he was trained for in the offseason.
I think he was also set back by nagging, minor injuries throughout the offseason and early part of this season. Under Haley, unlike Schottenheimer, staying healthy is part of being a complete player. Being hurt isn’t a Golden Ticket back into the starting lineup. You have to earn your way back. Nobody’s keepin’ your spot warm for you. The guy who takes your place now has the inside track on your job.
DJ still needs to have a bettr grasp of where his help is and what his job is, but another solid coverage back and better pass rush will help his game immensely, giving him more of the clear-cut situations on which he thrives. NT and another coverage back will help the pass rush on 1st and 2nd and the coverage back, alone, will help on 3rd. Makes it a whole lot dicier for offenses to predict where the blitz is coming from and what to do when it does come.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
So you would resign him if possible
We Will kick at least 4 Teams Asses in 09. Almost there :)
And Succop will be the Key in two of them. Skins & Raiders! Pittsburgh Sweet!
" Think and talk positive football off the field." Hank Stram
by Steve_Chiefs on Jan 3, 2010 10:17 PM CST up reply actions
Oh yeah. He just gets better with another year and better athletes around him.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
On further review: The Re-Sign him question.
It depends on what his demands were, Steve. As a former 1st-rounder, he may have an inflated opinion of his value.
I’d rather tear up contracts and pay a young guy more than his rookie contract if he out-performs it, than overpay for a guy whose asking price is more the product of a mistake in the 1st round, than his actual value. Rather get my LBs in the 2nd-3rd-4th and give ’em early raises and try to keep as many players at a decent level.
Guys at or near minimum and the guys up near the top are the ones who stand out as “bad” on first approximation. I generally would prefer to see fewer guys in the middle gettin’ punked and fewer guys at the top. Having some outliers at either end is probably inevitable, but I think the best team-building looks more bell-shaped and less bi-modal. Get the lunchbucket types to play their hearts out for you and spend extra time in the film room on their own, to give you every possible (invisible) edge.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
Well what is the contract worth then
I have an idea the vet minimum is 1 or 1.5 Million a year, total guess.
If the CBA is worked out he will get more IMO from another team and a longer contract to make it look right. Do you see DJ as a LJ type? I think LJ had some bargaining position and then physically declined, DJ has years left in his tank if we can get him to play to potential. I don’t know :)
Rule 49. " Think and talk positive football off the field." Hank Stram
Am I the only one that realizes this?
DJ will be a Chief next year. He is going to be a RFA because of no salary cap. You tender him the top tender at I think around 2 million per year and no one is going to give you a 1st and a 3rd for him.
Time is also a good teacher
I think Haley is doing the right thing. This guy has loads of talent but has a lot to learn before he can play for a Todd Haley coached team. Being in position is more important than the opportunity to make big plays and they are not completely exclusive of course.
In a few more years, if we keep him at nickel and on the team (and I think we should), I think he will grow into a wiser more controlled linebacker who has big play threats but still stays in position and does his job as a run defender.
Time is a great teacher.
NT that allows the LB to worry more about being beaten to the edge than filling in the middle would be great help.
I’ll add that both DEs were pretty new to this, comin’ in, too.
A lot of those plays DJ overran, on a team with a more disciplined (and powerful) front 3, and he’d’ve been successful at setting the edge, for the inside help to mop up, with ease.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
But yeah, I've seen numerous times when it seemed that DJ wasn't grokking the team concept and his role therein.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
I think...
if we signed K Dansby (very possible even with the CBA complications), draft T Cody in the 1st, draft Angerer (ILB, Iowa) in the 3rd, and trade back into the 3rd to get Rolle (SS, Florida St) it would solve all the problems you listed. We could use the 2nd rounders to improve the offense with an offensive lineman and a WR. Like Iupati and Gilyard. Hopefully, we can trade down.
can we keep this discussion about DJ, the current holes on the team and what positions were best suited to go after?
I’m NOT trying in any way to insult you, or bitch at you or anything like that. You just happen to be the first one to spin the topic to “what we should do in the draft” and specifically start talking about WHO we should draft in WHICH round and how we should TRADE BACK INTO some other round etc etc…
I’d LOVE to hear your thoughts about the players we have on the team, and what holes we need to fill. I just don’t want to see this become yet another arguemtn about who we should draft in what round, and how we should trade our picks, and which exact guys we should pick with which picks (like any of us actually know at this point who’s gonna be around in the 2nd, 3rd, 5th or whatever round).
What do you think about DJ? What position should he be playing, and why? What position groups are worth us going after in the FA or the draft? (just position groups). DO we have a safety on the team that can fill the role? A LB? a NT?
Seriously, I do want to hear what your thoughts are. I just don’t want to ready yet another thread hijacked by mock draft thoughts.
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
by Texas Chief on Jan 3, 2010 10:31 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
My bad, my bad...
I thought it was relevent to the holes listed in the post, and I was giving my solution. I meant to imply that DJ isn’t in the picture. He is a rich man’s Bobby Carpenter. A talented LB with skills that don’t translate to an every down player. He would be a tweener at safety and it wouldn’t work. His skill set allows for lateral movements that a LB a needs, but he lacks the agility of a DB.
by I_Bleed_Red. on Jan 3, 2010 10:38 PM CST up reply actions
You don't think he could play Vrabels Spot?
if Vrabelleaves we have a hole, Studebaker could but..
We Will kick at least 4 Teams Asses in 09. Almost there :)
And Succop will be the Key in two of them. Skins & Raiders! Pittsburgh Sweet!
" Think and talk positive football off the field." Hank Stram
by Steve_Chiefs on Jan 3, 2010 10:40 PM CST up reply actions
No...
because DJ can’t shed blocks. I don’t see how he his going to get to the QB on a consistent basis. Not to mention he would be responsilbe for run containment on the strong side and he was a disaster at that in the 4-3.
by I_Bleed_Red. on Jan 3, 2010 10:43 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Now that'sa comment I can agree with
Counting on DJ to contain the edge in the run game is an exercise in futility. He’ll be too busy playing 5 yards off the line trying to hide behind the DE so he can POP into the passing lane and pick off a ball.
Every time he DOES manage to pick off a ball it makes him look really really good, but the 8 times he gives up the edge and play ends up being a run through that gap is the reason he’s sitting on the bench.
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
I'm not prepared to pass judgement on that one, Tex.
I think there’s enough uncertainty, due to d-line play, that it’s tough to judge. I think the LBs are being asked to mop up in very dicey situations – There’s not a whole lot they can consistently rely upon from the front 3. Yeah, officially, he’s responsible for the middle, but there are certain things he ought to be able to count on, based on the line calls in the d huddle and pre-snap adjustments. There is zero predictability, right now, mainly because there’s zero expectation that the front 3 are neutralizing 5 blockers. Hell, half the time, they’re failing to tie up 3 blockers!
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
Agreed
We’ve been over this topic before and I would like to see what the addition of a solid NT would do for our linebackers that need the freedom to operate in space without having to take on an unchecked o-lineman…….makes for an easier time getting to the RB or TE/WR in the middle of the field without a big ass o-lineman in your facemask all the time.
by Hail2DaChiefs on Jan 3, 2010 11:16 PM CST up reply actions
Watching Edwards yesterday - not on purpose - just saw the d-line getting good push
and Edwards getting some penetration, here and there. I am not so certain that Denver’s O-Line is as good as advertised. There appear to be several tiers of trench play around the league, and, despite all our bitchin’, it looks to me like the Chiefs took some forward steps in the last year, overall. Still aren’t there, as the Ravens, Cowboys, Bengals, and others showed, but causing real problems for teams with weaknesses up front, like the Steelers.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
that was against the tiny casey...!
by kcstevesportsfan on Jan 4, 2010 12:27 PM CST up reply actions
I had that thought, too. Like maybe Wiegmann isn't all that against the 3-4.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
On the money, IBR.
I’m looking for an Eric Norwood type to be more of a beast of a rush LB to come in and push Hali, Studebaker and Vrabel. I can see another very good season from Vrabel splitting time (likely starting) at SILB, if that happens. I think he’s not in his best position, considering his intelligence, size, and HIS inability to shed blocks when he’s heads-up on TE or RT. If there’s one guy on the current D (other than DJ and Flowers) that I’d LOVE to see being given more options and more space to exercise them, it’s Vrabel, and I think lining up a few yards off the ball, and disguising his intentions, he’d be the turd in many an offense’s punchbowl.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
And overall about the post
I have thought about this before and give props on the post and idea, but in my opinion DJ is a bit to slow to cover anyone besides a tight end down the field. He also misses too many tackles and as a safety and the last line of defense, making tackles changes the scores of games.
He is fine where he is, he just needs to keep trying to improve and stop doing things “his way”. He needs to think on benefiting the team by fitting into a system and stop being such a wild card.
Is Vrabel as athletic and gifted as DJ? Of course not, but you know what you are getting. A guy who makes tackles and stays in his gaps. When DJ can stay in his gaps half as often as Vrable he can start playing more downs. And I think he IS improving in that regard.
Ok, so now that a few people have CHimed in, let me answer my own questions.
I told you my answers might supprize you:
If we moved DJ to the safety position and then concentrated our high draft picks (through trades or spending them) on NT, LB’s, and OL would we be better off than we are now?
Yes, we would be better off than we are now, simply because we went after a true 34 NT that could better plug the center. That by itself isn’t enough to fix our run woes, but add to that taking DJ OUT of the picture in the run game would be enough to make us better.
Can DJ handle the safety position?
Not really. He certainly has the ball hawking skills to be in the right place. He does an ok job of reading the play when he can hide behind great big linemen and disappear in order to POP out make a play on the ball. BUT, he doesn’t really have the straight line speed to run in coverage with a slot receiver, and he doesn’t have the hip tackling ability to wrap up a big TE. He also really doesn’t specialize in ‘covering’ someone, so much as he just has the instincts to be in the right place to break things up. He is no more of a long term solution than Mike Brown is at safety.
Are we better off with DJ on the bench on running plays, another hole to fill because of it, and going after a safety early draft?
No, not really. Although we certainly do need a SPEEDY safety that can cover in space and make plays on the ball, a NT in the middle of the field would make a much bigger impact on our defense. If there is an anchor in the middle of the field that can plug up one of the A gaps and put pressure on the middle of the pocket then our remaining LB’s would be more ‘free’. It would actually allow us to play our two 34 ILB in a more traditional role, assuming that we replace ONE of them with a true run stopper.
What position do YOU think DJ’s natural talents are better suited for?
34 ILB, but only in a traditional role. The majority of the time when you look at any 34 ILB team you will see a pattern emerge. ONE of the ILB is very strong at doing exactly what DJ does: spying the QB and making plays ont he ball. Playing a bit of mirror coverage and challenging receivers in the center shallows. The OTHER ILB is usually someone that is very very very diciplined to ‘gap protect’ run defense. As a team the 2 guys work together handing off their assignemnts to whoever is better suited for the role depending on the offensive alignment. This requires 2 things: 1) that the 2 players communicate WELL and play together long enough to know when to help each other, and 2) Each of the members of the ILB team to stay true to THEIR role. The ‘stay at home’ run stuffer cannot be a player that personal ego above team defense. He’s not going to get all the credit or the gaudy numbers, but without him staying in the gap the whole system falls apart.
With a better NT, a true MLB run stuffer, and a new C and RT are we a good enough team that we can afford a ‘struggling to learn’ DJ for 1/2 a season at safety?
Actually, yes. With a better NT and a true MLB run stuffer we don’t even need DJ to learn for 1/2 a season. We could just leave him right where he is as the ‘coverage spy’ member of the ILB team. What he would have to learn would be how best to work with his partner to hand off the responcibilites based on the offensive alignment. Even WITHOUT going out to get a top talent safety the defense would be markedly improved. Just adding a true NT and getting SOMEONE on the field that can play a ‘team defense stay at home’ LB role would , imo, result in a massive improvemnt to our defense. Page and McGraw/Brown could handle the safety duties assuming that we could stop the run and not give up everything shallow in the middle. An athletic safety wouldn’t hurt us any, but IMO it’s the least important of the 3 major holes we have up the middle of our defense.
So what the hell was the point of the safety post you ask?
— Well, to try and get a discussion going. Lately it seems to be a foregone conclusion that what we really need is a safety. I just don’t happen to agree with that assessment. In the past under a 43 alignment the thing we never had was an ‘all around’ MLB that could play the pass across 40 yards wide and 15 yards deep while ALSO playing the run stuffer up the middle. The BEST thing about shifting to the 34 is that you no longer NEED that player. The 43 cover 2 REQUIRES that ONE amazing player at MLB in order to function. The 34 does not. The 34 gives you the freedom to break up that responcibility and do it with 2 players. 1 a spy/pass player, and the other a run stuffer/pass rusher. However, the 34 REQUIRES that special guy at NT that can plug the gap and push the pocket.
6 on one hand, 1/2 dozen on the other. For better or worse we’ve switched to a 34 defense. Our biggest need is NOT at safety. A NT and a RUN STUFFING ILB that can play the opposite A gap + the B are the biggest needs. A playmaker safety would be a nice add on, but a play maker LB is just as good if the other pieces are in place and we already HAVE a playmaker LB on the roster. He just needs a true NT and Run stuffer to allow him to do his job. Williams/Mays have not shown that they fit the bill as a selfless gap protect run stuffer, and neither has Edwards.
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
by Texas Chief on Jan 3, 2010 11:22 PM CST reply actions 2 recs
rec
We Will kick at least 4 Teams Asses in 09. Almost there :)
And Succop will be the Key in two of them. Skins & Raiders! Pittsburgh Sweet!
" Think and talk positive football off the field." Hank Stram
I think Mays and Williams have shown they are decent, but not big playmakers
I also think they lack the speed for covering the entire field. But if we’re going to have big LBs like Pittsburgh that can take on blockers effectively, then getting a fast SS that can read and fill is critical. NT, ILB, SS, FS – I don’t know that one position is more important than another. Our entire defensive center is soft and we need players to come in, even if Page comes back full strength at FS. I assume that will be a focus of our draft and FA time. It’s the biggest need on this team right now, even more than a top O lineman, though I expect to see action there as well as WR.
-"A man may be a fool and not know it, but not if he is married." - H.L. Mencken
I think a Rush LB for the strongside, maybe swapping back and forth with Tamba, makes sense.
Then, assuming he returns, Mike Vrabel looks like a very good answer at that SILB position, next to DJ. He’s the one guy who seems to totally understand the situation, and who’s wily enough to disguise his intentions.
I can see an Eric Norwood in the draft, and maybe a FA or two being added to the mix. I’m hopeful for Dion Gales as Rush OLB, in deference to Matt Grbac, but my eyes tell me he’s a ’tweener with big LB size and slow DL speed.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
Oh, and rec'ed, btw.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
DJ
Yes, He made two huge plays today, and one huge play in week one. He lacks discipline in his drops, & occasionally gets too deep. He gave up a TD against the Steelers when he dropped so deep he was in the safety’s way on an underneath pass to a RB. This has been his MO all his career so far. Since he WAS going to be a FA until CBA isssue, he’s now a RFA. I’d like to see us tender him a “soft” offer, which would call for a 3rd round pick as compensation. Hopefully, someone would decide he’s worth a #3. I agree w/ ILB, NT, & S. Shore up the middle. As for Carr, perhaps he’ll be pushed by Washington next yr.
I think DJ is getting better
IN his assignments and Belcher along with him I think you give us a GOOD NT and the LBs look alot better and I think with Williams Mays Belcher and DJ in similar roles as they had this year with the chemistry built of a season together and a good NT in front of them we have a solid front and with DJ athletic ability and Belchers upside we could already have a couple key pieces to a long term solution and would rather we target the NT, FS/SS as Brown can play either better at SS, and CB along with comp at OLB.
And get us some help at WR to complement Bowe and Chambers who need to come back. Copper finally got a chance after pre-season drops and made the most of it so atleast 2 WR spots open. #1/3 caliber needed.
If we can’t get a NT in FA witch should be #1 goal then we take CODY out of neccesity just like the Jackson pick last year.
That was a nice confidence-builder for Copper (I mean "Cooper," which is what EVERY broadcaster calls him!)
He’ll have to catch quite a few more, before they start getting his moniker right.
I see him as another Mark Bradley. His production on ST will give him some more opportunities to contribute as a dual-role player, but not at all sure he ever becomes a consistent target as part of regular offense.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
Our needs complete team
top to bottom in order with 1st rd option for each
NT Cody not the player I would take
FS Berry after the Bowl game not as diciplined in coverage as I first thought kind of risky.
WR Bryant Is a Baller not much of a risk will be an impact player
CB Robinson Another Baller will be good
C None here 2nd rd Weisnewski, Walton
TE None
HB Spiller to early for a #2 back.
Nobody really stands out to me as must have players. I would like to see 1st rd pick go to Anthony Davis LT Rutgers Mcshay has him comming to KC aswell now so thet just makes me want him more. That would move Albert to LG and leave the option open for Waters to go to Center or RG. Having Davis and Albert on the Left side would be great and I could easily see Charles setting NFL records behind them.
It seems weird even to me with what our needs our But I would LOVE to see Davis in the first and Iupati at G in the second. I see both players as future Pro-Bowl Lineman and we would have a great Run Blocking O-Line that could control the clock and the line of scrimmage.
The key to this route would be to get NT and WR taken care of in FA for best case. Even without a WR in FA I see alot of talent at the position falling to the later rounds ala Johnny Knox this year.
seriously
does every thread have to turn into a mock draft?
Can’t we just discuss the players on the team and the position groupings for what they are?
I know, I’m a broken record, but so are posts and comments lately.
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
by Texas Chief on Jan 4, 2010 12:24 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
Can we ban mock drafts?
I think I am going to start flagging them.
by Nick Britt on Jan 4, 2010 3:27 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Since we are talking players who are currently on the roster...
Didn’t we JUST get a Safety from Philly’s practice squad? I haven’t seen him play but, I have heard VERY good things about him. Philly is usually VERY good on draft day. Is it possible that he is our Safety of the future and that we will likely pass on Berry to maybe get some help in the trenches?
by Chiefsfan1970 on Jan 4, 2010 10:00 AM CST up reply actions
Falling to #5, it's more likely that Berry's out of the discussion - almost a relief.
Adding a PS player from Philly isn’t exactly Earth-shattering. If he were THAT good, Philly would’ve done more to protect him. He’s a developmental player with upside. His addition says to me that the Chiefs are going to have some serious competition in training camp in the secondary. But his (quoting from others) 4.56 speed makes him more of a Gunther Cunningham Donnie Edwards kind of guy, to my mind.
If Berry’s still there at #5, I’d almost bet that KC would take him.
With a year under the “Haley System,” I don’t think Berry’s essential. More like, they’re prepared to add speed and see what OTAs and training camp tell them about the plethora of DBs we’re likely to see.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
I appreciate your feelings on this, Tex.
It’s almost inevitable that the draft and FA will factor into this discussion, but it’s also kinda refreshing that your foot’s on the brake pedal.
I will say THIS about draft/FA:
Focus in the draft: Trenches, DB, WR, rush LB.
Focus in FA: NT, ILB, RB
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
I did that to even with team HOLES to fill and then talked about why and how to fix it
as I see DJ and Belcher as our starters next year unless Dansby is brought in then I see Dansby and DJ as starters. Now it is the OFF SEASON and trades FA and roster moves are what to ORDER sry man its whats for dinner and Chief fans want a better product to buy!!!
Yes, I know it's the offseason...
…but there are 10 different mock draft threads a day where everyone tells the rest of us what we should be picking in the draft. They go as far as to tells us about how we should break it down by round, and what we should trade up or down to get etc etc…
What’s missing is ANY kind of break down of the players they are asking for, any type of pro and con to skill sets, any in depth discussion of WHY we need ‘X’ position group in the first place, any discussion of the skill sets or lack there-of of the players currently on the roster, any statistical exploration of players on the roster or those available in the draft/free agency, or in general any type of actual discussion beyond…..“Here’s who we should draft and in what rounds: …XXX….XXX….XXX….XXX”
Mock Drafts are all well and good, but FIRST write up a researched anyalsis of the current team to highlight the NEEDS. Tell us why those are the needs and which are the most important. THEN move on to a discussion of the various players available at whatever position group you have decided to focus on. THEN tell us your pick out of the available players and WHY. Match their skill sets to our needs and back it up with either thoughful commentary or statistical anyalsis.
We don’t any more lists of 7 players and comments like: We should get X player because he’s really good and we need a new X. — That’s the stuff that I’m just plain sick of reading. If it were one or two threads a day I would understand, but day after day I watch a well thought out article that could generate some nice in depth discussion BURRIED under various "What i think we need, My Mock Draft, Who We Should Draft etc etc type posts that offer almost noghing beyond a list of 7 – 10players and a couple of lines of text. Nothing about those posts invites discussion or debate. They could ALL be titled “The Same thing you just read in the last 20 threads, only re-arranged in 1 or 2 places with no thought provoking discussion what-so-ever”
KC— I’m NOT meaning to pick on YOU, or your post. I LIKE where you are starting on this second comment.
as I see DJ and Belcher as our starters next year unless Dansby is brought in then I see Dansby and DJ as starters
… is the BEGINING of a discussion that would warrent some attention. WHY Dansby? What makes him better than belcher? Why DJ? Why should he stay on the field? What do you see in either players game that makes you think they can do the job? Can they compliment each other, or are they the same type of players? Who fits best in our scheme? What are the pros and cons of one player over another? Do you have any research or statistical data to back up your thoughts? Can you present a case for your opnion and CHALLENGE me to shoot holes in it? Give me something to discuss.
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
by Texas Chief on Jan 4, 2010 10:26 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
I'm also tired of all the mocks
Last year, I was reading AP all the time after the season and there were enough mock drafts to make ones head spin like a top. None of them were even remotely close what actually happened. Not one single person thought we were going to pick T-Jax with our 1st. Not one! The rest of the picks were the same way. There was not a single one of the Chiefs draft picks last year that anyone predicted from AP.
I have an idea. Why don’t we all just see what happens in free agency and then, when the draft get’s closer, we can start talking about what the Chiefs will do with a better understanding of the direction of the team…
Just a thought.
by Chiefsfan1970 on Jan 4, 2010 10:50 AM CST up reply actions
Another rec. There's actually a Mock Draft Blog Here on SBNation that would be much more appropriate.
Heh. Just saw the Tim Castille pick. Hated it, but my buttons were bustin’ at the way our QB just plowed through the interference/block and buried the guy with the ball. OUR QB’S a FOOTBALL PLAYER, and not just a fragile specialist.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
yeah, it was a good hit by Cassel
he’s no “nancy”
Castille should have never thrown that pass… but you see that sometimes when you give a RB a chance to throw a pass… they get all excited “like jo-jo the idiot circus boy with my new pet” (Tommy Boy misquote, there)
They are so excited to get to throw a pass, they just chunk it up for grabs… not good unless your guy is WIDE open, which he clearly wasn’t.
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
* Stats are for losers
I don't expect Castille to make any profound reads.
He might just be going on how many unblocked defenders are in his face for the decision to throw or not, but with the general expectation that the misdirection DID work, and Cassel’s all alone, like Thiggie on HIS TD reception.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
Wow - I was just wondering the same thing - DJ at SS
I don’t know if he has the skills (actually, the speed) but I haven’t seen him improving at LB. He’s a good athlete – maybe it would be worth a look. I don’t think he has it in him to be a good LB because he doesn’t like taking on blockers. That was the knock on him coming out of college – that he shied away from contact. He evidently hasn’t changed in that. Interesting post – rec’d.
-"A man may be a fool and not know it, but not if he is married." - H.L. Mencken
It's sad that a good post with good discussion is about to disappear off the front page in 18 hours.
Rec’d, TC. Good to have you making posts again.
"I don't know if I want to go to New York. They'll have to pay me a lot more money because I like it here in Kansas City." -- Roger Maris
Yup. I'll throw my rec into the hat.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.

by 



























