On Sinking Ground
Anyone following my posts lately might have noticed one constant strand running through all of them: The belief that games are won in the trenches. It makes no sense for an engineer to build a house on sinking ground and NFL teams shouldn't construct offenses around mediocre offensive lines. Pic
Look no further than Kansas City's recent past for evidence of this philosophy.
Not to long ago Chief fans flocked to Kansas City games to tailgate, see old friends, have a good time, and cheer on their favorite players. If the stadium was rockin' then teams better not come a knockin'.
Opposing teams didn't like knocking at the KC door. They didn't like being in our house. And when the opposition did show up...they sure didn't leave happy.
This was our house, our backyard, our neighborhood. We rocked the house to the foundation every Sunday, a foundation that seemed forged by Zeus himself.
That foundation was the Kansas City Chiefs offensive line.
That's right. The Hogs, KC style: Willie Roaf, Brian Waters, Casey Wiegmann, Will Shields, John Tate.
The Chiefs were good because they had a great offensive line. We won the battle in the trenches. Yea, Green was accurate, Priest was agile, and Gonzalez had great hands. But we won because we had people like "Nasty".
Willie Roaf, nicknamed "Nasty" by his teammates, was a perennial pro-bowl player manning the left tackle position. We all can remember Willie hobbling up to the line of scrimmage like a wounded cow.
Then the ball was snapped. Hello Mr. Nasty! Willie Roaf
When that ball was snapped Nasty would absolutely maul defenders. He would lock onto you and drive you into the ground...you just got planted by an old man! Then Willie would hobble back to the huddle for the next call.
But that was not the only story going on each play. Brian Waters...Pro Bowl. Will Shields...Pro Bowl. Casey Wiegmann...great pulling center. John Tait...first round pick. This was no ordinary line.
Someone out there in Chiefs land got us started on this notion that the game was won in the trenches. Marty Maybe?
Marty Schottenheimer brought KC a taste of hope by forging a foundation of his own. He built his house upon the likes of John Alt (pro-bowl 92,93), Dave Szott (all-pro 97), Tim Grunhard (pro-bowl 99), and Will Shields (perennial pro-bowler). KC lined them up and moved them out.
This glimpse back into the Chiefs good years sheds light, I think, to the fact that the success KC has had over the recent past coincides with the great lineman we put on the field. When we had good lines...we had good teams.
Our current Kansas City Chiefs have come to a crossroads, a defining point on how their future will play out. What is Pioli going to do with the current state of the offensive line? Is mediocre going to be good enough? Is the answer simply coaching them up or do we need additional talent?
The Chiefs currently line up Brandon Albert LT (1st round pick, $3.5m), Brian Waters RG (pro-bowler, $4.1m), Rudy Niswanger C ($1.5m), Wade Smith RG ($875k), Ryan O'Callaghan RT ($655k). These lineman should be commended for the amount of work they did through the season to get to the point of being respectable. But is it enough? Do we have enough #1 picks on that line? Does Pioli need #1 picks to construct a a great line.
As I sat and watched the Jets vs Colts game this past weekend I started to appreciate what New York had done to get this far into the playoffs. Yea, their defense played great to get to this point (and you all know what I think about having game-changing defenders). But don't overlook that offensive line.
D'Brickashaw Fergusun LT (1st round pick, pro-bowl 09, $3.4m), Alan Faneca LG (1st round pick, perennial
pro-bowler, $7m), Nick Mangold C (1st round pick, pro-bowl 08,09, $730k), Brandon Moore RG ($384k [stud drive-blocker]), Damien Woody RT (1st round pick, pro-bowl 2002, $5.8m).
That's four #1 picks on that offensive line for the Jets. Now that is an organization that built it's house on solid ground in 2009.
Over the past three years...where was KC's house Built?
On Sinking Ground!
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.
96 comments
|
8 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yep.
We need more OL help. I wouldn’t be against getting Okung. Then again, I also think that good help can be found in rounds 2, 3 and 4.
Rest assured, Pioli is going to address the OL.
My sentiments are likely to be summed up with one of these 2 quotes:
"Shut the f--- up."- Matt Cassel
"WHAT THE F---?!?!"- Todd Haley
by Red N Gold Beast on Jan 26, 2010 10:09 AM CST reply actions
Rest assured, Pioli is going to address the OL
I said the same thing this time last year.
Ohhh Brett...One more year! One more year! One more year!
Superbowl Prediction - Colts 41 Saints 23
by craig in calgary on Jan 26, 2010 10:21 AM CST up reply actions
True, but:
Don’t you get the sense that our shortage of draft picks combined with the late hires kind of hog tied Pioli last year? I get the sense that he has a very good understanding of this teams needs now, and has a plan for this off season. I don’t think there’s a GM on the planet that would ignore an OL that nearly got said GM’s pet QB project killed. This OL will be greatly improved come September 2010
My sentiments are likely to be summed up with one of these 2 quotes:
"Shut the f--- up."- Matt Cassel
"WHAT THE F---?!?!"- Todd Haley
by Red N Gold Beast on Jan 26, 2010 10:36 AM CST up reply actions
I agree that the line will be addressed this offseason (We better not be wrong on this)
I however don’t agree that the late hire was the reason Pioli (arguably) had a shitty draft last year.
If Arrowhead Pride can do 1,000,000,000,000 mock drafts in an offseason, surely to hell Football Czar Pioli can make a big board with a couple Oline men on it in the 5 months he was on the job. I didn’t get the 3rd and 4th round picks last year, and I certainly don’t get them now. Those were perfect positions to draft interior linemen and if all goes well those picks (Magee and Washington) won’t see the field for the next 2-3 years.
Ohhh Brett...One more year! One more year! One more year!
Superbowl Prediction - Colts 41 Saints 23
by craig in calgary on Jan 26, 2010 10:45 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
rec'd and right on, craig! I've said the same thing for months ...
Pioli failed to do his homework last winter and it hurt us all year long … every AP fan knew we had a weak OL a year ago … hell, everyone in the NFL knew it, and that includes Pioli if he’s half the “genius” he’s made out to be
Pioli, in my mind, brought in the (wrong) cart (Cassel) before the horse (OL) … you build teams on the lines, and our OL was bad and going downhill a year ago (at least Herm had the sense and foresight to BEGIN addressing the OL)
5 months to look at tapes of 2008 and Pioli couldn’t see the need for OL? and he’s getting paid HOW MUCH to do WHAT???
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whilock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!
He didnt fail to do his homework
there was no o lineman that was worth getting last year. Also we had 53 holes to fill last year and how many draft picks to try and fill them with. Pioli filled in the ones he could on the defensive side, defense wins championships
by badassz1987 on Jan 26, 2010 12:57 PM CST up reply actions
really?
defense wins championships
tell that to Marty … or the Jets for that matter … you still have to outscore the other team in order to win games, or championships
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whilock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!
... except that he kinda did just that
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whilock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!
I agree
The 3rd and 4th rounders were head scratchers. I didn’t mean that Pioli wasn’t ready to draft. Let me use an example:
Pioli get’s hired on here in Feb. He sits down with Clark and has a talk about the team. Clark tells Pioli that the Offense was ranked around 20th and were serviceable given the right schemes and players, i.e., a mobile QB could survive. He then says that the D was ranked 30th and gave up an NFL worst ever 8 total sacks. Oh, yeah, and opposing teams averaged about 160 rushing yards a game. And, BTW, a safety and a CB lead the team in tackles.
Pioli says, well WTF is wrong with the DL?! They need to be leading team in tackles, or at least allowing the LBs to lead the team. And 8 F#*&%!@& sacks? WTF?! We can stop gap the OL with FA signings for now, but for the love of God, let’s draft some long term help for this pathetic excuse for a defense.
And that’s how Goff get’s added in FA and TJ and Magee get drafted.
I’m just saying, from an outside view where you didn’t get to watch the 2008 season first hand, I can see why Pioli would have acted the way he did in the free agency/draft. The D was by far the most broken looking part of this team, mostly because Herm and Gailey put lipstick on that OL pig by using Thigpen and the “Arrowspread”. We probably would have been better off in the long run if we had just lined QBs up behind an epically bad OL and let the stats tell the true story.
My sentiments are likely to be summed up with one of these 2 quotes:
"Shut the f--- up."- Matt Cassel
"WHAT THE F---?!?!"- Todd Haley
by Red N Gold Beast on Jan 26, 2010 11:07 AM CST up reply actions
Red N Gold
Rest assured, Pioli is going to address the OL.
until he proves otherwise, I’m not sure Pioli can address a letter …
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whilock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!
Until he proves otherwise:
He’s already proven in CLE, NYJ ans NE that he knows how to address problems on a football team. There’s a reason he was the most sought after GM of the decade. I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt since one year isn’t a very telling sample size.
My sentiments are likely to be summed up with one of these 2 quotes:
"Shut the f--- up."- Matt Cassel
"WHAT THE F---?!?!"- Todd Haley
by Red N Gold Beast on Jan 26, 2010 11:23 AM CST up reply actions
It might be interesting to compare the Pats OL
during their SB runs with Pioli and see what the make-up of their OL was. That might give us an idea as to where Pioli thinks the best value OL picks may reside.
by chiefsandcigars on Jan 26, 2010 10:17 AM CST reply actions
Here's NE's current line. MAnkins and Kaczur were added in 2005. I'm too lazy to look any further.
Matt Light- 2nd round
Logan Mankins – 1st round
Dan Koppen – 5th round
Stephen Neal- UDFA
Nick Kaczur – 3rd round.
This should give you an idea of how the OL will be addressed.
My sentiments are likely to be summed up with one of these 2 quotes:
"Shut the f--- up."- Matt Cassel
"WHAT THE F---?!?!"- Todd Haley
by Red N Gold Beast on Jan 26, 2010 10:25 AM CST up reply actions
Nice work
If we had to focus on one area that led to the Pats demise in the Super Bowl…what would it be?
Their o-line could not handle the front 4 for New York.
Maybe that should be a lesson learned for Pioli.
Bewsaf
Meh.
The Giants had a really, really, really good DL/front 7. I think it’s kind of hard to come to the conclusion that that OL was bad because they got beat by a DL that came to play the way those Giants did. It’s also kind of hard to argue that the Pats OL isn’t one of the best in the NFL.
With that said: I would really, really, really like to have a good to above average OL and a bad-ass, one-of-the-best-ever DL.
My sentiments are likely to be summed up with one of these 2 quotes:
"Shut the f--- up."- Matt Cassel
"WHAT THE F---?!?!"- Todd Haley
by Red N Gold Beast on Jan 26, 2010 10:42 AM CST up reply actions
try this on for size and see if it fits ...
if your OLine isn’t as good as the other team’s DLine (and LBs), your OLine will get beat
if your OLine gets beat, your QB ends up on his back or not enough time to read defenses and complete passes, and your RBs have noplace to run (noplace to hide … Martha Reeves and the Vandellas!)
really, it’s very, very basic stuff … for an Offense to excel, you need a superior OLine
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whilock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!
And if your:
DL isn’t as good as the other team’s OL, then your OL will get beat. And gain yardage/TDs at will.
It’s very, very basic stuff. One side of that ball can’t be ignored in favor of making a ridiculously superior offense (or defense). Both sides have to be good in order to win. Look at the 2003 Chiefs for evidence of this basic knowledge.
My sentiments are likely to be summed up with one of these 2 quotes:
"Shut the f--- up."- Matt Cassel
"WHAT THE F---?!?!"- Todd Haley
by Red N Gold Beast on Jan 26, 2010 11:30 AM CST up reply actions
Wow
That doesnt help much as far as identifying what rounds Pioli might target the OL. One thing that is good is that it appears he builds the OL from within the organization rather than through FA. It would make sense to me that an OL line gels faster when built from the inside rather than a patchwork of FA.
by chiefsandcigars on Jan 26, 2010 11:48 AM CST up reply actions
It's probably hard to tell what rounds he'll target
because he probably takes the best player available whenever he can. Before getting into a long debate over T-Jax and “the reach”, remember that Pioli/Bellichick similarly “reached” for a guy named Richard Seymour at the beginning of the Patriots rebuild. It remains to be seen whether or not Jackson will be another Seymour.
I think that Pioli picking guys that are the best available is why we see picks from different rounds securing spots on the OL. So, who knows what Pioli is going to do? He might take Okung. Or McClain, or Berry. Trying to nail down what the Chiefs will do in this draft is almost impossible.
My sentiments are likely to be summed up with one of these 2 quotes:
"Shut the f--- up."- Matt Cassel
"WHAT THE F---?!?!"- Todd Haley
by Red N Gold Beast on Jan 26, 2010 11:59 AM CST up reply actions
hen too ...
So, who knows what Pioli is going to do? He might take Okung. Or McClain, or Berry.
he might take Suh (if available) or Cody or “who? who the hell is HE???” for all we know
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whilock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!
After yesterday's weigh-in....
…. I doubt anyone’s taking Cody at 5 in the 1st round. I feel bad for the kid, that kind of obesity is seriously difficult to battle and he’s got a lot on the line. One of the draft boards I saw had a post that said Cody was > 400 lbs when he first came to Alabama, but if 370 is the best he can do after a couple of years in the top BCS program…. it won’t necessarily get any easier when he’s a pro. I think he’s too much of a risk for round one, or even early in round two.
I'd take him with the 2a pick.
It’s amazing what a couple of million dollars will do to fat cells.
"Leave the gun. Take the cannoli."
"Mr. Pioli is a man who insists on hearing bad news immediately."
by Don Piolie's Consigliere on Jan 26, 2010 3:09 PM CST up reply actions
Maybe D-Bowe can help him lose some weight
"The way this works is you string together some good games, some good practices and you get momentum and you gain confidence," linebacker Mike Vrabel said. "It can be a real positive for your team. It builds on itself."
Yeah, I hear his grandma has a secret weight loss formula.
"Leave the gun. Take the cannoli."
"Mr. Pioli is a man who insists on hearing bad news immediately."
by Don Piolie's Consigliere on Jan 27, 2010 12:13 AM CST up reply actions
We don't have to have a dominate oline to win.
We need a steady one…I think we have a steady oline minus Niswanger. We could probably upgrade Center and RG in the draft but that’s it. Everyone else is steady.
We need defense. More than anything. We couldn’t stop anyone this past season. I don’t care if we score 100pts if the other team scores 101pts it won’t matter.
Our offense was pretty decent if you ask me….I know it was pathetic at times but we have a RB that teams fear now. We could use an upgrade at TE too.
We are not that far off…
Rolando McClain, Iupati or Render, JD Walton, Nate Allen, and maybe a Mardy Gilyard or Golden Tate and we are getting to the playoffs….especially if we can land Wilfork.
"Its going to be a challenge, its going to feel like forever, and there will be difficulties. But we will emerge on the other side of it stronger than we were when we entered." ~ Sudden
by Matt_Grbac on Jan 26, 2010 10:19 AM CST via mobile reply actions
I cannot agrue much with getting a good defense
the only team in the championship games that did not have a “great” QB was the team with a stud defense and four #1 picks on the offensive line.
Bewsaf
I think our oline is a Center and RG
Away from actually being pretty respectable. I mean they really came on at the end of the season…you don’t really wanna break what chemistry they have created with one another.
So I am hoping Pioli can maybe address Center and or RG in draft or FA…. And go mainly defense/st in the draft….the only exception is if a really talented WR like Tate, Gilyard or Blair White falls to us. And a good TE like Gonzalez, Peek, or Pitta.
"Its going to be a challenge, its going to feel like forever, and there will be difficulties. But we will emerge on the other side of it stronger than we were when we entered." ~ Sudden
by Matt_Grbac on Jan 26, 2010 10:34 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Aaron Hernandez not Gonalez...oops
"Its going to be a challenge, its going to feel like forever, and there will be difficulties. But we will emerge on the other side of it stronger than we were when we entered." ~ Sudden
by Matt_Grbac on Jan 26, 2010 10:36 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Matt ...C & RG from "respectable" ... ??? ... you forget LG is aging ...
and OL takes time to get it together, learn what it takes to play at this level, gel with the rest of the line, etc …
if you also realize that Waters is getting up there agewise … now you have 3 positions to upgrade … and I think for the FUTURE of the team we should get as many potential OL as we can (within reason) starting with our #5 pick (Okung) and yes, 2nd Round as well
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whilock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!
IMO,
This draft needs to produce a stud starting center, and a good replacement for Waters, and this OL will be average in 2010. Brian doesn’t have much time left here, and by learning from past mistakes we need to be proactive when players start to edge retirement age. That’s how dynasties are built: keep the ball rolling with depth so that you don’t have to take a “reloading” year.
My sentiments are likely to be summed up with one of these 2 quotes:
"Shut the f--- up."- Matt Cassel
"WHAT THE F---?!?!"- Todd Haley
by Red N Gold Beast on Jan 26, 2010 10:49 AM CST reply actions
Waters is a FA
How do we even know Waters will be a chief next year? Correct me if I am wrong, but I remember hearing that Waters hired an agent for the first time in his career. If you take that to account plus the fact that him a Haley don’t get along, we might see Waters walk this year……….
yes chiefn24 1/2...he did you may be right about him. I don't care either way
one more year would be cool but we need to replace him anyway. We’re rebuilding. There’s no rush.
Bews, I can't rec this one enough ... seems once is the limit and I want it like 1,000,000
absolutely, positively agree and then some … which is why I’ve wanted Okung and any other top OL we can get … right side, left side, in between, the more the merrier … 1st round, 2md and 3rd, get ’em all and start with Okung
seriously, that Roaf and Shields line … ohhhhhhhhhhh and could they pull … why did Green have so much time to throw and Holmes so many holes to run thru? the OL …
we need more NASSSSSSSSSSSSTY types … oh yeah
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whilock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!
Roaf is one of my favorate players
When defenders played against Roaf they just disappeared, gone.
I can still remember a game against the Ravens. The Ravens were talking smack the week before and the KC line just came out and snot bubbled them…it was great. The Chief just took the Ravens lunch and their wasn’t a damn thing they could do about it.
Bewsaf
by Bewsaf on Jan 26, 2010 11:48 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
That was great. I remember that game too
Ray “I jump on the pile of players after the play has been done for about 3 seconds then pound on my chest like a gorilla like I actaully did something” Lewis was talking smack all week and finished with something like 0 sacks, 0 tackles and 0 int.
Ohhh Brett...One more year! One more year! One more year!
Superbowl Prediction - Colts 41 Saints 23
by craig in calgary on Jan 26, 2010 11:53 AM CST up reply actions
I remember a camera shot
of him dejected on the bench. The Chiefs line dominated him so much they had the announcers talking about how Ray might be getting older.
Bewsaf
I seem to remember a mic'd up Ray Lewis complaining about double teams.
That was a great game.
My sentiments are likely to be summed up with one of these 2 quotes:
"Shut the f--- up."- Matt Cassel
"WHAT THE F---?!?!"- Todd Haley
by Red N Gold Beast on Jan 26, 2010 12:01 PM CST up reply actions
yeah, I felt soooooooooooooo sorry for poor Ray ...
well no, not really … damn that was one helluva game (and as convincing an argument as any to build a truly dominationg OLine)
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whilock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!
Ray Lewis may be aging...
But he still plays with the same firece mentality as always, even if he doesn’t make all the plays. He’s the QB of that defense and is one of the main reasons its been good for so long… Much like Peyton is for the Colts.
He deserves to celebrate every tackle his team makes. Loved the way we handed it to em, though :-)
"The first step to penetration... must not be lateral"
-Confucius
Without a doubt.
He’s a future Hall of Famer for sure. Too bad in this specific game he was playing against an OL that boasted at least 3 future HoF in Roaf, Shields and Waters. Not to mention a damn good RB in Holmes and a future HoF FB in Tony Richardson. That was just not Lewis’ day.
My sentiments are likely to be summed up with one of these 2 quotes:
"Shut the f--- up."- Matt Cassel
"WHAT THE F---?!?!"- Todd Haley
by Red N Gold Beast on Jan 27, 2010 12:07 PM CST up reply actions
rec'd for using the term "snot bubbled"
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whilock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!
I agree to a certain extent
Yes, it all starts in the trenches, but I don’t want us to take an OT in the first round this year. Why? Because I just don’t think Russel Okung is that great. Yeah I think he will be an above-average LT in this league, but not a great one. And if you are drafting a LT at #5 you want him to be a dominant, franchise LT that is going to be your bookend for the next 10+ years. Someone like Jake Long, Joe Thomas, etc. – guys that dominanted in college. I haven’t seen that from Okung, Campbell, or Davis.
Okung’s footwork is a little better than Branden Alberrt’s, but I think in the long-run I don’t see anything in Okung that says to me “this guy is going to be worth the #5 pick”. I didn’t see any OT in last year’s Draft that said that to me either.
I think Rolando McClain or Eric Berry would have a much bigger impact on our team than Okung would.
Yes we need interior lineman, but I think we are fine with Albert and O’Callaghan as the tackles. Waters can stay at LG unless we get Mankins. We need a new center and a new RG, that is for certain.
I just don’t think Russel Okung is that great.
Fair enough. If you don’t have a horse to pick…you don’t go for a pony (if you think Okung is a pony).
Bewsaf
I think Okung isn't a Top 5 pick
There are a few prospects I do like though at OT:
-Vladimir Ducasse – UMass
A developmental RG/RT prospect with limitless potential
/Selvish Capers – West Virginia
Very athletic, long arms, looks like a perfect fit for LT for a ZB team. Could be available when we pick in the 3rd round.
Ciron Black – LSU
Another RT/RG type with a lot of experience against top competition
--
These guys are all 2-3 rounders that I would really like us to take a look at.
This post seems to me....
to be a backdoor draft post. Correct me if I’m wrong but I read the thesis to be “draft o-line in the first round”. I would disagree with that. Using the author’s own example of a great KC Chief’s line, we can see an alternate strategy to building a dominate O-line. Roaf, former 1st rnd pick of New Orleans acquired through FA . Roaf was coming off a bad injury and was considered a risky pick by KC. KC gambled and won. Waters, UDFA acquired off waivers from Dallas. Actually entered the NFL at another position (TE as I recall). KC gambled and won. Weigmann, FA acquisition who began in Indy where entered as an UDFA. He also bounced through Chi and the Jets. He was considered too small to ever be a dominating center. KC gambled and won. Shields, 3rd round pick of KC. Medium risk. John Tait, 1st round pick of KC. Low risk. So, three of the fab five were FAs. Both tackles were firsts, one which KC got through a risky FA move. One 3rd round pick with average risk and two absolute long shots. The present line already has spent a high pick on a LT. KC still has Waters. There are a good many developmental linemen on the roster. O-line is very deep in this years draft. All this brings me to my conclusion, I’ll be disappointed if KC spends the #5 on a tackle.
The Chiefs have a lot of holes
so, for me, saying the Chiefs “must” do ‘x’ in round one of the draft might be a little inflexible.
After saying that…healthy QB’s are very valuable. The O-line keeps the QB healthy and is the most important position in constructing a good offense (of course, IMO).
Bewsaf
that's so true ...
healthy QB’s are very valuable
just ask Brodie Croyle …
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whilock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!
Not so many glaring holes offensively as the season progressed...
except perhaps at wideout. There is a very deep draft for lineman as well as number of pretty good FA linemen. IMHO, biggest need is a real NT, but that can be addressed through FA as well. Next is a toss-up between MLB and WR. With the head coach being coming from the offensive side of the ball, I think KC might surprise everyone again and draft someone like Dez Bryant, not my personal pick, just a guess at what might go down. Everything, however, hinges on what happens in early March.
Nothing against Dez
but I hope not.
I guess it would depend on what each of us defines as a “hole”. Does serviceable count as a “hole”.
The line and WR need some work just to get to 8-8. TE, fullback, and a second tailback upgrade is needed to get beyond.
But you cannot do it all in one year. Which is why I hope fans don’t get upset when Pioli does not go “their way” first.
Bewsaf
I feel better about a Dez than a Benn
but I still think Alexander would be better than either of them.
Sorta Biased :)
"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli
by Steve_Chiefs on Jan 26, 2010 7:50 PM CST up reply actions
Uh yes
Sorta hiding out today :)
"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli
by Steve_Chiefs on Jan 26, 2010 9:59 PM CST up reply actions
This post seems to me….to be a backdoor draft post.
I like coming in the back door….Uhhh…that didn’t sound right.
Bewsaf
does you wife know?
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whilock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!
First of all...Bewsaf my boy...as always and without exception, another remarkable post
thank your for the memories.
Second. As to whether we should beef up one side of the team or build evenly, and whether or not we need a dominant O line to win let me add this;
STOP selling this team short. Stop it!! Right now!! EVeryone. Of course we cannot fix all the holes this offseason. Of course not. Of course we can’t. Anymore than we can guarantee if we drafted a QB to school behind Cassel that he would turn into the next Peyton. But why wouldn’t you want the best?? Dream big people. We’re building from scratch with the best GM available and two superstud coaches on OC and DC.
Of course we want a SUPERIOR O line. Of course we want a superior Defense. Of course we want the very best QB in the NFL to be ours. If you don’t want that, your in the wrong sport men. I"m over hearing people selling out before we even get started.
I don’t EVER want to hear the words “He’ll do fine” or “serviceable” “good game manager” “at least he doesn’t turn the ball over a lot”. BULLSHIT!!
STOP IT NOW!! This is our beloved Chiefs here. Aren’t you all SICK and tired of settling?? Where has it gotten us so far? When have you seen us in a SB? When have you seen us in an AFC Championship? How about a F*N playoff game for God sake’s.
Everyone, stop now. Take a look in the mirror and ask youself why you don’t WANT the very best TEAM in the NFL?? A COMPLETE team. Not one side or the other. Not on offense. Not on defense. Not at QB especially. Not at receiving position. Not at RB. NOWHERE. If you want to win SB’s PLURAL. If you don’t want to be a Dilfer led Ravens team then STOP asking for it. Start asking for a Peyton clone to find his way here.
Start asking for the same caliber players and talent that Bewsaf mentions in his post. Start asking for a Jerry Rice equivelant to end up here. We got Charles. Isn’t it exciting? Why would you, any of you not want that kind of electric play from all side’s of the ball?? Are we so beat down that we have forgotten what hope is? Do we feel like we don’t deserve to dream that big? I can’t answer that for you. But I’m over it. I’m over a bunch of whiney fans who hate it when you suggest that we could do better at a position on our team. If you want the same results year after year here, then do nothing. Don’t change your thinking. Or you could try a different way and see what happens.
Of course we want a far superior O line here as Up’s says. but I want the leagues’ best defense as well. And I want the best QB in the league wearing red and gold. I want the best coaches. Who would have DREAMED we would end up with Weis and Crennel? No one?? Why not?? Because it seems like we KC fans have forgotten how to dream for great & phenomenol things for our team here.
by krayfish on Jan 26, 2010 12:49 PM CST reply actions 3 recs
Any comment I might have would ruin your nice post
so…………...(silence)
Bewsaf
by Bewsaf on Jan 26, 2010 12:54 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
well to clarify...I am listening to people arguing about how come we can or can't do this or that
because you can’t fix it all in one offseason. SO??? Fix whatever you can get based on who’s available and dream big. someone’s got to have the best team across the board. It might as well be us someday. It ain’t happenin’ this year anyway.
I love your passion for the Chiefs
It is a great thing. This second comment is what the discussion is about. Fixing what you can with the players who will come in next season. Some feel it is a safety, others LB and on and on. They are peoples opinions that is all. What everyone wants is to bring in a player who is going to make those around him better. That is all you can ask for because we are not going to get 22 pro-bowlers overnight as you have said yourself, but there is no reason to replace a player who is good enough until some of the other depleted areas of the team are corrected first. That is all anyone is trying to get accross. Sorry if it upsets you. It is just reality thats all.
rec'd kray ... and you are right on
yeah I’ve been pushing for OLine because I see it as a huge need AND one that needs to be redone not JUST for THIS year, but for years to come, and that takes time (not to mention damn good players) …
do I want a dominant defense? hell yeah … a Manning clone at QB? you betcha! the best coaches and special teams? hell yeah …
I’m a greedy bastard and, like you, I want it ALL … and I want it RIGHT NOW
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whilock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!
me too. That's why I keep beating it in people's heads in here that we are REBUILDING..
it’s okay to dream. This is the only time we can dream. Because everything is unknown. New coaches again. After this draft, new players again. comeon man. Let’s want the very best here. Let’s hope and pray that every time we turn around another player is our next surprise player like Jamaal Charles. A breakout game changer.
and we need to draft smart like Bewsaf said. WHich I feel we will. We have lot’s of picks to work with and even some expendable players to hang out as trade bait with the lack of CBA, making our guys even more valuable.
If you want an O-line right now....
Then you don’t want to draft O-line. You want KC to hit on a FA.
I am not sure
how productive that could be this year with the way the league is with the collective bargaining.
- picks usually come in right away and start though. Not sure about the rate of starting with #2s and o-line.
Bewsaf
Not true.
Branden Albert. Joe Thomas. Jake Long. Michael Oher. Ryan Clady. Those are all first round picks off the top of my head. All of those guys came in and contributed immediately, all of them starting all 16 games of their rookie season (as far as I know; barring injury, etc.).
2nd round OL:
Chilo Rachal (SF) started the last 6 games of his rookie year. Matt Light (NE) stared 12 of 14 played. Mike Pollak (IND) started 13 games. Aaron Sears (TB) started 16 games. Justin Blalock (ATL) started 14.
There tends to be a drop off in games started for guys from the 3rd round. They’ll generally start maybe half a season at most.
Point being, drafting OL can still produce immediate effects. Look at the dominant OLs in the game right now: NE, IND, NYJ, BAL, MIN, etc. All of those teams’ OLs are built through the draft, with one, or maybe two at the most, free agents holding spots on the OL. Drafting is more often than not THE PROVEN way to build a contender quality OL.
My sentiments are likely to be summed up with one of these 2 quotes:
"Shut the f--- up."- Matt Cassel
"WHAT THE F---?!?!"- Todd Haley
by Red N Gold Beast on Jan 26, 2010 7:20 PM CST up reply actions
The interior guys usually the better Center prospects at Center or Guard are
good bets to start right away successfully also. See Buffalo this year Both Guards were rookies and played well.
"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli
by Steve_Chiefs on Jan 26, 2010 7:53 PM CST up reply actions
Alex Mack just owned Edwards in the game they set the rushing
record. I believe he was a late first round pick.
"Leave the gun. Take the cannoli."
"Mr. Pioli is a man who insists on hearing bad news immediately."
by Don Piolie's Consigliere on Jan 27, 2010 12:26 AM CST up reply actions
I want to nail home one of your points,
The Jets just came one game away from the Superbowl with a rookie quarterback, tailback, Braylen Edwards and Brad Smith. Their D was stout but without that o-line they would have sucked so bad the Toilet Bowl would have looked good.
We got a ways to go before anybody can say who the Chiefs will be drafting. Were in a real tough spot we may not be able to get a real dominant olineman in a thin draft class (if the combine doesn’t create some surprises). But for sure this year we have to pick up at least a couple pieces of the puzzle this year at the very least.
by tenacious rdc on Jan 26, 2010 2:05 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Perfect +1 rec'd...patience people is right. This is a complete rebuild from the coaches to the scheme's to the players.
I expect us to rebound very nicely this year, but nothing spectacular. Just marked improvement. Even if we get the best players possible, they will take time to develop. The point is to keep getting the right pieces to the puzzle each and every chance we get.
by the way Bewsaf..how about a little gratitude friend?
without my comments you would only end up with 312 comments not 314. And you would only get 96 rec’s not 97. So I’m a game changer. I am the SIZZLE!!
For what its worth..
I got to talk with Todd McShay this weekend and he said we are 100% going with an OL at 5.
No the purple dude is Steve_Chiefs!! He's an oomfa loomfa...
Cause he’s got the golden ticket…… la la la la
Damn Kray it was Kazoo
Your brain has fossilized :)
"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli
by Steve_Chiefs on Jan 26, 2010 4:56 PM CST up reply actions
I think your probably right, I hope if thats the case
that he is as good as other people say he is and not as average as some people around here say he is. If we go Okung in the first, do we shift the line over or do we move Albert over to rt? I still want a starting guard though. We have to fix the O line and finish the D line this year no matter what. If thats through the draft or FA it has to be fixed this year.
"Leave the gun. Take the cannoli."
"Mr. Pioli is a man who insists on hearing bad news immediately."
by Don Piolie's Consigliere on Jan 26, 2010 3:02 PM CST up reply actions
This would make absolutely no sense to me
there is no o lineman in the draft that is projected to be better than Albert so this would just be a wasted pick
I didn't know that the OL draft prospects were measured by Branden Alberts.
Do they look at a LT and say “well…. he’s better than KC’s LT Branden Albert, so he should be a top 14 pick”?
My sentiments are likely to be summed up with one of these 2 quotes:
"Shut the f--- up."- Matt Cassel
"WHAT THE F---?!?!"- Todd Haley
by Red N Gold Beast on Jan 26, 2010 7:31 PM CST up reply actions
Man, that's something I would say RNG....hee hee....you are learning quickly.
Now egg him on until you justify calling him a retart. Then, when Joel asks you about the whole thing, you blame it on Jcomp. I do it all the time.
I had a retart post once that got deleted.
I’m kind of glad. It was one of those “open mouth, insert foot” kind of posts. Now I reserve the term retart for only the most vile of evil doers.
My sentiments are likely to be summed up with one of these 2 quotes:
"Shut the f--- up."- Matt Cassel
"WHAT THE F---?!?!"- Todd Haley
by Red N Gold Beast on Jan 27, 2010 11:47 AM CST up reply actions
I just read back thru my comments and I dont see anywhere
in my comments where I said anything like that. We already have Albert at LT so if there is not an o lineman in the draft that is better than him to put at LT then picking an o lineman with the 5th pick would be a wasted pick imo
I was just teasing dude.
I was playing off your comment:
“there is no o lineman in the draft that is projected to be better than Albert so this would just be a wasted pick”
I’m just joking around with the fact that Okung is projected to be a pretty darn good LT, at least by some “experts”. Albert is playing out of his original position at LG, and has played OK at LT. He’s not the best LT in the league though, so drafting a natural LT and developing him could be a viable move.
My sentiments are likely to be summed up with one of these 2 quotes:
"Shut the f--- up."- Matt Cassel
"WHAT THE F---?!?!"- Todd Haley
by Red N Gold Beast on Jan 27, 2010 11:53 AM CST up reply actions
I figured you were
just caught me on a bad day is all
by badassz1987 on Jan 27, 2010 12:17 PM CST up reply actions
I am not sure that I myself would consider it a "wasted pick"
but getting a top notched something else, you insert defender, and picking up some o-line later would be another good way of going about it.
Bewsaf
I don't think it would be a wasted pick either.
I’m not saying I want to draft Okung at #5, I’m leaning Berry or McClain if we can’t trade down and pick up some more picks. But I think it would be hard for Pioli to lay off a starting LT. Outside of QB, 34NT, thats as hard a poisition to get as there is and it would help us.
"Leave the gun. Take the cannoli."
"Mr. Pioli is a man who insists on hearing bad news immediately."
by Don Piolie's Consigliere on Jan 27, 2010 12:40 AM CST up reply actions

by 




























