If You Can't Beat Them...Zone Them
If you can't beat them...zone them.
That is to say, zone block them.
When Larry Johnson touted the ball for Kansas City the offensive line was asked to do more "drive" blocks: Man on man, lock them up, and drive them back.
In the last quarter of the season the Chiefs started doing more zone blocking for Jamaal Charles. Charles, a speedster with good vision, seemed to thrive with the addition of more zone schemes. Jamaal looked better, the line looked better...heck, the whole offense looked better.
So what where the Chiefs trying to do in the last quarter of the season? What was the line being asked to do in the zone blocking schemes?
This post will review the basic tenants of the zone block and attempt to shed a little light on what the Chiefs were doing different in the last quarter of the season in regard to line play.
In the zone block the offensive lineman is usually asked to "reach" or "scoop" the next defender over. So, if the play is going to the right...the offensive lineman attempts to reach one defender to his right.
This type of blocking requires a lot of athleticism from the lineman. Each lineman, especially the guards and center, need to be quick enough to scoop the defender next to them. When successful, these blocks can create an open lane for a fast back with vision. Pic Source
Frequently, two offensive lineman engage one defender. One lineman is responsible for "setting the block" while the other lineman, the one attempting the reach block, scoops the defender (or replaces his colleague's block). This can be seen in the diagram to the right. After the center (in this diagram) sets the block, he moves to the next defender over: In this case a linebacker at the second level.
Many times the guard, in this diagram, may not get the DT scooped. But that is ok. That's because the back, who is fast and has vision, reads just that...and bam, he cuts back. The guard, if he does not get his guy reached, is responsible for driving his defender where he wants to go. And if the backs reads it right...then that would be out of the play.
Now that we know more of what the line was being asked to do...lets move to the scouting report.
|
----------------------------------------------------------- Kansas City Chiefs Scouting Report - Line Play ----------------------------------------------------------- |
|
||||
The second half of the season started off with Haley & CO calling more zone blocking plays. This allowed the Chiefs newly found gem, Jamaal Charles, a chance to showcase his speed and cutback vision.
As the season progressed Haley slowly added to his scheme and as a result made the line play more complicated to read for defenders.
KC's progression:
- The KC offense starts running more zone stretch plays and draw plays.
More zone blocking was just what the doctor ordered. Jamaal thrived in it and the o-line was better at it. The offense improves.
- Haley then starts adding to the package by putting in zone plays that pull a guard opposite.
Like a draw play, this gets the LB reading zone one way while the Chiefs are going another. Many times all an NFL team needs is one step. Waters and Smith start pulling more and I start changing my grading chart to include pulls.
- The Chiefs incorporate more shifts in their pre-snap look. This reveals more of what the defense might be doing and sometimes dictates the defense the Chiefs will get.
At this point the Chiefs seem to be more confident in what the players have picked up from the new playbook. A noticeable shift in scheme starts to develop. It appears that the game plan has gone from basic and simplistic to more complicated and tactical.
- The Chiefs incorporate a zone stretch blocking scheme into their passing attack. In this series the line all zone one way (slide) and the running back (usually) goes the opposite direction to pick up the lone rusher left alone by the zoning of the line. All while the Chiefs are running a pass play.
Sometimes these new "dummy" blocks were run with the play action pass and sometimes just with a drop back pass. However they ran it, the Chiefs were able to create a second of hesitation in the defenders secondary because they would initially read, run. The Chiefs protection continues to improve by positing a seed of doubt in defenders minds.
- Chiefs add a "quick" draw to their plays. The O-Line takes one quick step back, like pass, then full speed ahead for the run block (drive block not draw block).
This is a nice wrinkle for the run game. The Chiefs o-line appears to be more successful with this type of drive block (that they used as a change-up). On the initial o-line step (which is backwards) the defender reads pass and gets into "rush" mode. This allows the line that little edge it needs to be more affective on the drive block.
With all this new line-play the Chiefs have the defenders thinking, "run...no pass...no draw...no left...no right." Now, after tapping into this indecision in the opposing defense, Kansas City's run game gets even better.
Did anyone notice that Haley seemed to get better at calling the plays at the end of the season? At least that is what most casual observers that I talked to told me.
Well, that "better" play calling coincided with the increase in line-play complexity. In reality, Haley probably didn't go from a good play caller in Arizona to a moron in Kansas City. But he did go from a team in Kansas City that had limited line-play at the beginning of the season to a more complex one at the end of the season.
Games are won in the trenches...and Kansas City started looking better at the end of the season because they were winning more battles in those trenches.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.
82 comments
|
35 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
nice post
I noticed that towards the end of the year our offense improved, while it could have been the whole zone blocking and emergence of JC, i think alot of it had to do with the confidence of the players. They knew as we all did that the Bills, Browns, and even the Bengals were beatable, plus Haley said they had alot of their "best’ practices. Hopefully we can stick to this blocking scheme and continue to improve.
Warriors come out and play
Great post but
Draft day… Impossible 2 mess up? Well if it aint Coach Marty finally making an appearance somewhere. Where in the hizzel have you been?! Marty’s scouting for somebody, but who? The Chief’s cant blow this one. First hand view of players, talents, attitudes, and committment. How hard is that 2 spot:)? The Chiefs are looking for smart players, you know the Vrabel type. We might not draft who you all are thinking we’re gonna draft. All I’m saying is that if they got rid of Pollard, then he must didnt meet the "standards" they were looking for. We’re looking for a Polamalu, bone crusher with extreme intelligence and knowledge at his position. If you think that way, you know where we’re headed. This draft should be interesting, very, very interesting. I’m waiting on free agency to open up. I can almost guarantee there’s a player out there somewhere wanting to come here now. Weiss, Crennel, Pioli, Hailey. Its an all-star line up with our coaches. Goodtimes ARE comin!
curious why you c/p'd your post from another story (Chiefs Brass Joins Crennel ...) and just copy the whole thing HERE
not that it’s unimaginative or anything … I will say it makes NO sense in light of THIS post
ok, it’s unimaginitive AND it makes no sense in light of this post
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whilock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!
lol
Thanks, Im glad im not the only one confused.
the messiah did alot better toward the end of the season
The line looked a lot better plus gave cassel much better protection hopefully we use this type of blockin all season next year and watch the messiah run down everyones throat
FOUR F'S FIND UM FEEL UM FUGUM FORGET UM.
by sexassassin on Jan 19, 2010 10:22 AM CST via mobile reply actions
Great read as usual Bewsaf.
I always seam to learn something new each time I read your posts! Thanks!
So you think you are so important that no one can replace you? Put your finger in a bucket of water and pull it out. Does it leave a hole? Nope, just some ripples that eventually calm themselves!
by Fan of the Red And Gold on Jan 19, 2010 10:25 AM CST reply actions
Jamaal will be in the pro bowl next year
I know the coaches don’t care about stats and pro bowls. I can’t wait to see what Jamaal
does when he is the feature back for 16 games.
hopefully
just hope he can handle the whole season as the feature. i think we need a bruiser to go along with him
Definitely need a between-the-tackles guy.
"The first step to penetration... must not be lateral"
-Confucius
awesome stuff as always, Bews ... and rec'd
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
Whilock Rocks!
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!
Fantastic post, Bewsaf. Rec'd.
Love the diagram in the first post. I thought it was especially interesting how well we held off the NT’s in the last half of the year. Same principle as the diagram, but a bigger guy whose job is to fill that gap, yet we were able to zone block effectively. Shows a good grasp of the scheme as the season went along, and should be able to translate with a little less effort into next season.
Well done as always, thanks for teaching all of us a little something today. =)
"I don't know if I want to go to New York. They'll have to pay me a lot more money because I like it here in Kansas City." -- Roger Maris
Exactly why Casey Weigmann excelled
People wonder how he went from good with Vermiel to bad with Herm and then back to good in Denver last year (and a Pro Bowl) with Shanahan but back to poor this past season with McDaniels.
And lucky for Chiefs fans, most of the center prospects in this year’s draft are zone blockers…could possibly find a starter in round 3.
Casey was a good zone blocker
could get to the second level
did some pulling out to the edge also…good lineman that did not get the kudos he probably deserved due to the hall of fame lineman around him.
Bewsaf
Bewsaf
I don’t know alot about the college prospects, are there any G/C in the draft who excelled in this zone scheme that will be available ronds 3 thru 5.
Sergio render is one that comes to mind
He’s projected as a 5th rounder, and has really looked good
You're either growing or you're dying, there ain't no third direction
-Big Tom Callahan
Zone vs Power blocking
Before the Donks tossed their DC this week, McDaniels announced that they were abandoning the zone blocking scheme for a power blocking scheme (guess that means two new playbooks). How many teams run Zone vs Power?
Thanks for the nice write-up!
-1 zone blocking team
Thanks for the info
I have not looked into it…but if you can think of a team that has a fast back that does a lot of cutbacks or runs outside a lot…then that might be a zone team.
Bewsaf
Pete Carroll in Seattle
has hired former Denver and Atlanta o-line coach Gibbs to work for him in some capacity…whether that be o-line coach or just an assistant of some sort I dont know…but regardless, he has the man who is possibly the best zone blocking coach the NFL has ever seen.
I wanted tackle help last year
because I loved Eugene Monroe’s footwork and wanted to move Albert inside to guard. This year however, I dont see a tackle who would be an improvement over Albert. Albert did some things in the Denver game that he hasnt done since college, such as pushing his man back into the 2nd level and then going to attack a linebacker after he had already taken his man out of the play.
Grain of salt:
Maybe the Denver D-Line wasn’t all that hot.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
And that Denver LB
who Albert handled out in space was Dumervil…you know, that guy who had the most sacks in the League ;)
Ryan Succop will be the kicker for the AFC in the 2011 Pro Bowl
by PVChiefsfan on Jan 20, 2010 11:55 AM CST up reply actions
Which OT?
Albert – great strides in balance and footwork at the end of the season (not lunging or leaning as much). Shows signs that he can do the job just fine…not a lock, yet. Do we “need a LT”…no.
O’Callaghan – Solid but not great. A great backup but at this point not someone you envision as a starting RT for 8 years. If he continues to improve, who knows. Do we “need a RT”…no. Not as much as we need more competition at RG (sorry Wade)
I think the line could use some more competition though. Some think that taking the OT high in the draft will improve the line overall because it will move some lineman around (like Albert to LG).
I think we can get some good competition in later rounds.
Bewsaf
+1
I think adding and moving players around will just slow the progress that they made in the last few weeks of this season. O’Call was the one I had the question about though.
I think you want dominant tackles.
O’Callaghan isn’t dominant. He’s good, though. Still would like somebody close to top-shelf at RT, and there’ll be that kind of player in the 2nd. Nothing about pushing Albert inside. Lots about throwing some of our tackle wannabe’s into the G mix. Richardson, Ndukwe, in particular, along with Colin Brown. All 3 guys have good feet for G, but so-so feet for NFL tackle. That’s why I keep saying RT might go farther towards our shared goals than just drafting a G. Better to have Gs who fell short of the measuring stick @ T, than Ts who fell short of the measuring stick @ T.
With all this talk of zone-blocking, are we sure that Haley continues with it or did he just resort to it, because 3/5 of the O-Line was gettin’ blown up, and he needed some subtlety to substitute for stout? Haley’s roots are not Z-B…
OTOH, Z-B might also make the GM’s job a little easier, same as 3-4 does on D-side. And Haley/Muir seemed to do a solid job of teaching the Z-B last season.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
I think zone blocking is a proven long term style of play...
Denver had great success with it for many years and now you see Kubiak doing well with it in Houston. I hope we stick with it.
by Chiefsfan1970 on Jan 19, 2010 4:18 PM CST up reply actions
With all this talk of zone-blocking, are we sure that Haley continues with it or did he just resort to it, because 3/5 of the O-Line was gettin’ blown up, and he needed some subtlety to substitute for stout? Haley’s roots are not Z-B…
Haley’s roots may not be in running a ZB scheme, but I believe he does have experience with it. Remember that ’Zona had a problem fielding a successful power run game, but they were successful the types of draws and zone-type plays that you run from that spread offense that require more zone blocking.
He’s sort of making that transition here too. The run game failed miserably, and out of necessity Haley has been forced to conform more to a scheme that favors the personnel.
"The first step to penetration... must not be lateral"
-Confucius
I think they
did it due to last resort. But I think it made a lot of since when Charles showed what he could do in it.
That is a good question though. Do they want to stay with it?
Your right Haley/Muir did a good constructing a salvagable o-line out of a few journeyman.
Bewsaf
stay with it
for the love of God, don’t make the OL un-learn what you “done learned them”
:)
start from this level, and continue to build the line in the ZB image going forward
You're either growing or you're dying, there ain't no third direction
-Big Tom Callahan
Good read Bewsaf
I always enjoy your o-line breakdown. Do you think that zone blocking is more effective against a 3-4 def or a 4-3 def?
The very existence of flamethrowers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done."
George Carlin
Great post Bewsaf
Didn’t Colin Brown do nearly only Zone Blocking at Mizzou?
Get healthy man!
Will Ebners Hit Parade, Pain TV; Channel 32; All the time! (PDT)
by MarioVanPeebles Republic of China on Jan 19, 2010 12:16 PM CST reply actions
What little I saw of Brown, he didn't look athletic enough for NFL tackle.
I think if he’s pressed into duty at OT, it’ll be a lot like Damien McIntosh, who would’ve made a great G in the NFL, if everybody hadn’t thought he was the fulfillment of their T wishes.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
I need a mini Bewsaf
Keep him around on gameday so I can have a little info and insight when I need it. Rec’d
make mine...
…with purple Troll Doll hair and wearing ‘Mario’ like overalls.
And he’s gotta have he GI JOE kung-fu grip!
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
by Texas Chief on Jan 19, 2010 12:43 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Hmmm
…
thinking...Troll Dolls…Market the little kiddies who pester their parents until they get one.
Bewsaf
This is a nice wrinkle for the run game. The Chiefs o-line appears to be more successful with this type of drive block (that they used as a change-up). On the initial o-line step (which is backwards) the defender reads pass and gets into “rush” mode. This allows the line that little edge it needs to be more affective on the drive block.
I would think this scheme, with the defense being in pass rush mode, would allow for way more effective 2nd level blocking. The OLine can essentially usher the speed rushers on the edge completely out of the play with a little leverage and a push, then rushing upfield.
Kind of like how Albert was able to block three guys on the 56 yard run by JC in the Broncos game.
"The first step to penetration... must not be lateral"
-Confucius
Wow, just checked the highlights
Ther were a LOT of 2nd level blocks in that game.
"The first step to penetration... must not be lateral"
-Confucius
by ArrowSpread on Jan 19, 2010 12:35 PM CST up reply actions
With the draw
you can defiantly
usher the speed rushers on the edge completely out of the play with a little leverage and a push, then rushing upfield.
This “mini-draw” step influence the LBs more than the DL. Although I am sure the one step messed with the DLs run leverage.
The Chiefs used this change up drive block in Denver more of a straight ahead block than a draw (user the DE past you) block. But they did use both blocks, draw and mini-draw, in the Denver Game.
And your right…both types of blocks got the o-line to the second level.
Bewsaf
brew -
I would be happier than a two peckered pup if Alberts would solidify our left tackle. Hell any of the olineman for that matter. But, yeah, but : with a few players whose talent level is questionable their margin for error is miniscule. Do you think this is why it take a half of season to gell? That’s something that’s bothering me when I read that “they made strides later in the season”…. I think there are a lot of guys off the waiver wire that could play a NFL average game o-line if they could play every snap with their A+ game. That’s impossible though. But there is also another answer : get bigger more talented players.
I don’t know, enjoyed your post and wanted to comment.
Thanks for the comments tenacious rdc
I suppose better talent does have a steeper learning curve. The more average you are the more precise and consistent you must be in your tech.
Even though the line got better…I don’t think the Chiefs will stop short and not try and upgrade and/or bring in good or better competition to replace what is there or drive those that are there to go to the next level.
Bewsaf
Good Post, rec'd
Sometimes it’s good to know what went right with the Chiefs as opposed to what always goes wrong. Thnaks, Bewsaf.
Excellent, Bewsaf
Very informative… and Rec’d
John
"Gentlemen! You can't fight in here. This is the War Room!"
I was impressed by how well Albert turned his season around in the second half.
I know the whole line started playing better and probably has a lot to do with defenders having to respect Charles and not just pin their ears back and rush Cassell all day. I’m very confident still in Albert at LT.
Out of curiosity Bewsaf who do you see as the best Zone Blocking prospects in this draft?
The first 3 picks of the draft will be defense. Pioli loves him some defense.
As a follow on would you want a big bruiser back or a back similar to Charles to run behind the ZB line
Rec, great write up, again Bewsaf :)
"For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius." Scott "Young Frankenstein" Pioli
by Steve_Chiefs on Jan 19, 2010 4:50 PM CST up reply actions
I don't think you need to bring in a big bruiser
Shonne Greene, Fred Jackson, Derrick Ward…
All those guys can run between the tackles and have quick enough feet to cut back. And they can catch out of the backfield. I think that’s type of back would be most complimentary to the type of scheme we’re trying to run.
"The first step to penetration... must not be lateral"
-Confucius
As a compliment to Charles
I think we need a little more meat. Someone with good vision that can also make the reads..but a good change of pace.
Bewsaf
I will just comment
on who I think is athletic enough to be considered a zone blocker type.
Albert
Niswanger (suprise!…but at guard not center)
Waters (time is ticking…a move to center would help)
Wade (atheletic enough to zone but still needs more lead in his shorts)
O’Callaghan (I don’t think of him when I think of a zone blocker)
Bewsaf
Thanks
I was going to post and ask someone to explain the differences in the run schemes. Great post.
Another interesting post, Bewsaf, rec'd
This reminds me of when Joe Delaney started to shine. The Chiefs O lineman began talking about how they were changing techniques to use a “shield block” because Joe was through holes so quick it was more important to give him an opening than to try and sustain a block by driving a guy up field. I don’t know if the whole scheme was really around then, but they did change their system.
Do you think that Haley wanted to go to Zone blocking all season, or did he just use it because of having Charles? I think he may have wanted to use it all along because It would explain why he pushed some of them down more in weight to get them more athletic.
"If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then give up. There's no use in being a damn fool about it." ---W.C. Fields
That is a good observation
I am not sure what Haley want from the start. On the one hand, we have what you pointed out. On the other hand we have the pick up of lineman from Miami (who are more drive blockers) and the pick up of O’Callaghan (which is more of a drive blocker).
However, at the point of picking up those lineman…the line had gotten to the point where we needed anyone who was just a little better regardless of what type of blocker one might think of them as being.
Bewsaf
In The Zone
It’s hard to say what Haley had in mind and when.
There are advantages to Zone Blocking which fit the disastrous situation we had by week 8. One advantage is that ZB can make up for your linemen being overpowered by superior brute force. It is in effect a double team method where you take advantage of the brief period directly after the snap when your blockers outnumber the defenders (most of the time).
It’s also very simple and a moron can fully understand the full premise of it (and variations thereof) with about 30 minutes of chalkboard and 30 minutes of walk-thru.
Of course to get it to work takes lots of practice and teamwork. Especially when facing a defense which uses lots of looks, shifts, stunts, zone blitzes and the like. Simple as it is you can still have your O-Line get skunked on a play with 5 big guys standing around afterward pointing fingers at each other arguing about who was supposed to who’s “man.”
Looks like they got pretty good at it by week 17 and ironcally against the Donks who were masters of it for years (they are abandoning it from what I’ve heard).
This post proves Haley made the right choice on being OC for the season
Haley being OC for the season put a year ahead instead of a year behind if Chan would have stayed OC.

by 


























