Wade Smith was the Best Value on the Kansas City Chiefs Offensive Line
In addition to our Greatest Chiefs and Keep or Cut series, we're starting another this morning: Best Value by Position.
What's that you ask? I'm going to examine each position group's players and compare their 2009 salaries to their stats. I'm judging value to mean the most impact for the least amount of money, or the "best deal" if you will. And of course, there will be a vote on who is the best value by each position group.
Today, we have the Kansas City Chiefs offensive line.
Wade Smith would is at the top of the best value list for me. He only made $875,330 in '09 and played in all sixteen games. He didn't start as many games as some other players did but we all know Smith is our utility offensive linemen. He plays center, guard and tackle. His ability to step and play different positions when players get injured is just absolutely huge in my opinion.
My second pick for best value on the o-line is C Rudy Niswanger. He started all sixteen games for the Chiefs and came in at just under $100,000 per start. He also only had two sacks allowed and four penalties. The penalty number isn't especially impressive until you compare it to some of the Chiefs' other o-linemen.
After the jump, I've taken each Chiefs offensive linemen and listed their:
- Games played and games started;
- 2009 total salary (this includes signing bonuses and other bonuses);
- Penalties committed; and,
- Sacks allowed.
Check out the stats after the jump and let us know who you think the best value on the Chiefs' offensive line is. Who do we get the most from at the least amount of cost? Remember, this isn't only about money. If you feel like Brian Waters and his $4.1 million dollar salary was a good value, then by all means make an argument.
LT Branden Albert
- Played in 14 games (14 starts)
- $3,598,950 ($257,067 per start)
- 10 penalties
- 9 sacks allowed
G Mike Goff
- Played in 8 games (7 starts)
- $1,700,000 ($242,857 per start)
- 1 penalty
- 3.5 sacks allowed
G Andy Alleman
- Played in 9 games (3 starts)
- $466,240 ($155,413 per start)
- 1 penalty
- 1.5 sacks allowed
T Ikechuku Ndukwe
- Played in 12 games (3 starts)
- $466,240 ($155,413 per start)
- 2 penalties
- 1.5 sacks allowed
C Rudy Niswanger
- Played in 16 games (16 starts)
- $1,550,330 ($96,895 per start)
- 4 penalties
- 2 sacks allowed
T Ryan O'Callaghan
- Played in 14 games (12 starts)
- $655,330 ($54,610 per start)
- 2 penalties
- 4 sacks allowed
G/C/T Wade Smith
- Played in 16 games (9 starts)
- $875,330 ($97,258 per start)
- 2 penalties
- 4 sacks allowed
LG Brian Waters
- $4,100,000 ($273,333 per start)
- Played in 15 games (15 starts)
- 8 penalties
- 1.5 sacks allowed
T Colin Brown
- $463,800
- Placed on IR before the season
0 recs |
21 comments
|
Comments
Wow! I guess Goff would make the worst value list. That's awful.
It will be interesting to see if any of these no namers devlop under better tutilage. I’m sure I spelled that wrong.
by krayfish on Jan 14, 2010 7:50 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I pick O’call because before he got here B.Richarson sucked a## but I think he could pretty much be a started at RT unless we get someone else
I LOVE MY CHIEFS
by kcchiefsfan515 on Jan 14, 2010 7:50 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Now I realize
I left off Barry Richardson for some reason. I don’t think he would have made the top spot anyway.
Founded Arrowhead Pride 7/26/2006
Please read our community rules, netiquette rules and our technical overview before commenting.
by Chris Thorman on Jan 14, 2010 7:53 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'd like to see his stats anyway
Could you add him to the list now?
"If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then give up. There's no use in being a damn fool about it." ---W.C. Fields
by Big Chief on Jan 14, 2010 3:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Its all good
but damn did albert do some bad but the last game against the donkeys he looked pretty good lets hope he can keep that going!
I LOVE MY CHIEFS
by kcchiefsfan515 on Jan 14, 2010 7:55 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
There's going to be a LOT of movement again this offseason I imagine.
This is going to be a super exciting offseason. It’s going to be great!
by krayfish on Jan 14, 2010 7:56 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
How
If I may ask theres not too many FA out there What the draft??
I LOVE MY CHIEFS
by kcchiefsfan515 on Jan 14, 2010 8:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
There may not be too many FA's available
but the ones who ARE available could REALLY help this team. And we have a coaching staff who has a connection to these players as well.
Vince Wilfork, drafted by Pioli, coached by Crennel for 1 season.
Karlos Dansby, buddies with Haley, coached by Pendergast who may or may not be on staff.
Say we land 1 of those guys..it gives us more options in the draft. For instance, we need a Safety. We sign Wilfork, and Eric Berry is off the board. So we draft Rolando McClain 1st, and Myron Rolle or Nate Allen in round 2. That gives us another 2nd rounder to spend on the OL, opening more possibilities to spend the 3rd rounder on.
Or, we get Dansby. We can go after Berry and if hes off the board, we may trade down. I dont think Pioli wants to draft a Tackle. People say Okung/Davis/Buluga and I dont see it happening. If we are able to trade down, depending how far down we move, I could see us going after Earl Thomas, Mike Lupati, Dan Williams, or maybe someone else who I cant think of right now.
Either way, if we pick up 1 or both of those guys in FA, its going to make the draft that much sweeter. The less holes we have to fill heading into the draft, the better. Another player worth mentioning coming up on FA is Stephen Neal, RG from NE.
by Petey14 on Jan 14, 2010 11:49 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Rudy Niswanger also had many bad snaps...
that diminishes his value
by ravenhawk on Jan 14, 2010 7:59 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
O'Call had similar numbers to Wade
but averages less per start than anyone. Had he started and played in more games, those numbers maybe have gone up, but his average per start would have still gone down. For VALUE, he was a solid addition and a possible long-term starter with more development. I think he was one of the best waiver/PS pick-ups Pioli made this year (Chambers would be the best)
by chiefsandcigars on Jan 14, 2010 8:03 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I voted O'Call
The key to the improvement of the O-line toward the end of the season (both in terms of pass protection and run game) was stability. Granted injuries played a role, but what really seemed to turn the corner was O’Call nailing down RT after several weeks of musical chairs. Interesting how many penalties that Waters and Albert had – is this a sign of decline on waters part, and a position change for albert? I say keep o’call at RT, move albert to guard and spend pick no 1 on LT
by paxi on Jan 14, 2010 8:19 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
+1
being outside he had to be quicker dealing with better pass rushers.
by Helmets on Jan 14, 2010 8:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm on the O'Callaghan bandwagon.
He’s young and very coachable. The right side of the line drastically improved after O’Callaghan got his feet wet and started to play with some confidence. Unless the Chiefs get a real bargain in the draft at RT I say O’Callaghan probably starts there next season. I see a very promising career ahead for O’Callaghan. Good bargain this year.
by G.L. on Jan 14, 2010 8:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Brian Waters..no doubt
Waters got a bad rap this yr…..I guess many of you have forgotten just how many Pro-bowls this man has been to. He is the leader of that line. I believe he over compensated a lot this yr due to the constant shuffling and weak play of others. This was one of his worst yrs statistically, but i think that comes from knowing he is gonna have to maybe help out the guy next to him, trying to get a good jump. There is no doubt in my mind that Waters is still the best player on the O-Line.. With better players around him, his play will return to Pro Bowl status.
by KCinAZ on Jan 14, 2010 8:43 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Gotta be O'Callaghan
A total bargain for a right tackle who played darn well, probably cemented his spot at RT and reportedly has a real mean streak. We could be watching this guy for a decade.
Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable. Mark Twain
by Chiefho on Jan 14, 2010 9:43 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Who the hell voted for Goff!?!?!
Goff, Alleman, and Ndukwe were not a good start for Pioli on building us a line
I don't want no Yo-Yos
by CaptainPoopDeck on Jan 14, 2010 9:44 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Two points:
I am not on the budget plan when it comes to line play.
Number of snaps played is more important than games played or games started. How about cost per snap, penalty frequency per # snaps, sack frequency per # snaps? Those would be better measures IMO.
Merlinnj
by merlinnj on Jan 14, 2010 10:19 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I went with Wade
because without his versatility I think we would have had even more problems on the line this year. Plus I made a comment several weeks ago talking about his value. But I would have no problem with picking O’C either. He came in and solidified a position that has been trouble for the Chiefs for years, like since Tail left for Chicago.
"If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then give up. There's no use in being a damn fool about it." ---W.C. Fields
by Big Chief on Jan 14, 2010 3:04 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 
































