The Catalyst: Chiefs Offensive Line Is The Crux Of The Problem
Photo via David Eulitt of the Kansas City Star
From the FanPosts -Joel
"It was Haley's flingin' flarnin' play-callin! He ran too much! If he didn't run, we coulda gotten back into it, fling-flarn it!"
"Cassel can't make the big throws! He's no better than Brodie!"
"LJ can't run worth a lick! Bench him!"
"That defense can't give up that many yards! Period! Our defense is terrible!"
Come along with me after the jump and I'll reveal how the only people in the firing line today should be the five guys up front, and the effect that created in yesterday's debacle.
Everything yesterday can be brought back to the offensive line. All of it. The whole damn debacle. It really, honestly, truly is all their fault.
This isn't to say that the other units played well. They didn't. Good lord they didn't. When our punter, who gets more playing time than some running backs in the league has a bad day? It's one of those days. But as we watch the disastrous fallout and we all turn to our own coping mechanisms, I'm brought back continually to the simple fact. The offensive line screwed us yesterday. And everything fell apart from that point forward.
And oh, the bargaining mechanisms are varied.
Denial: "It was just a bad day. We're not really THAT bad." (There's only about three people that feel this way. They were fans in the late 70's, early 80's.)
Anger: "FIRE THE COACH! HE HASN'T DONE ANYTHING! TRADE CASSEL! HE STINKS! FIRE THE WHOLE DEFENSE! FIRE PIOLI! FIRE CLARK HUNT! FIRE THE FLING FLARNIN GOVERNMENT!" (This comprises about 60% of both the Chiefs' fanbase and the greater Kansas City metroplex this morning.)
Bargaining: "As long as we eventually win a Super Bowl, I'm willing to put up with this. For a while. Maybe."
Depression: "Hey look! The Royals are on..."
Acceptance: "We suck." (About 30% of the fanbase is here. Unfortunately, this 30% feels the need to say it every thirty seconds. "Hey, did you know we suck? Because we suck. Quit fooling yourselves, I'm the only person that's being honest here. We suck. No, that touchdown pass was not good. It sucked! I heard the news today, oh boy, and we sucked. " I feel like it's that weather dude on ABC that spends an hour interrupting programming to tell you the same damn storm cell is where it was five minutes ago.)
We all want answers. This fanbase is dying for a win. DYING. I know the popular movement is to not mention Herm, but I swear, I'll only mention him in this context. We went so long, the fanbase has been reduced to a hunger-starved refugee wandering the desert. When we entered the desert, we wanted a Super Bowl. No more one-and-done playoff appearances. No more wild cards. And we didn't care if we had to cross the desert to get there. We wanted a championship.
Then we got to the desert, and it was dryer than we thought it would be. It was hot. And muggy. And there were scorpions. And cliche storms that would spin you till you were nauseous. And we've been in this desert so long that now we just want water. We don't care if we get to where we were going. We just want water and food and a bed. A nice, comfy 10-6 season and a first round ejection by Indianapolis. We can't remember why we came to the damn desert in the first place.
And so people are angry, and upset, and depressed. And those are all natural reactions. i can't blame anyone for wanting Haley fired today. I'm willing to give him a year, just like I gave Edwards, just like I'll give our next coach. But the miserable existence of this franchise means I can understand the disgust everyone's feeling. But if you want to talk about yesterday's game, not the season, not the team, but yesterday's game, it all comes down to the line. All of it. Let me explain.
Yesterday the Chiefs faced an opponent that is, quite simply, the perfect counter to us. You don't have to be a perfect counter to us to beat us as badly as they did, but it helps. We have a 3-4 defense? Guess what. Philly's used 3-4 a ton over the last ten years, they know that scheme inside and out. Haley comes from the Parcells tree? Guess what? The Eagles staff has been running against those types of offenses in New York, Dallas, and in Philly for just as long of a time. But what really killed us is the staple of Philadelphia's entire system. Blitzing.
That team blitzes better than any team in the NFL. Better than the Steelers. Better than the Ravens. The Eagles have been known since Andy Reid took over, to bring the house, every down, as much as they can. The entire objective is to kill the quarterback. Not rattle. Not pressure. Kill. And against most teams, it means that it's a danger the offense has to contend with, and there will be sacks, and you have to push them off of you by getting a block from your line long enough to start hitting some receivers.
Well, our offensive line is the worst in the league. Hands down. No questions asked. And what that meant yesterday was that our offense had half the time those other teams had, which was only about four seconds. And you saw it from the beginning. If Cassel dropped back to pass, he had someone in his face, immediately. Someone pushing past our guards, and then a blitzer rushing the gap. Cassel was sacked from the very first possession, and that set the tone. And Philly, in typical Eagles fashion, kept it up all day. They never backed off, never let up, never sat down in zone. They just kept bringing it. Because they knew it would work.
Now, I think LJ's done as much as anyone. I think he runs with no heart, I think he runs as if he's already falling down, I think he's a malcontent and no longer effective. But the Eagles' blitz package meant that there was simply nowhere for him to go. If you get a single solid block against that blitz technique, you can break five to eight yards. LJ never got one. Charles had the speed to break outside, but then we'd hold to wipe it out. So there goes the running game. Victim 1.
Cassel couldn't hit anyone, because he didn't have time. At all. Nevermind the fact that his best receiver wasn't playing, which contributed to the disaster, you need speed guys with hands to catch slant routes off that blitz. None of our receivers have that kind of ability. And if they did, it wouldn't matter, because Cassel usually had to start avoiding the rush as soon as he took the snap. The passing game: Victim 2.
Our defense looked horrible at times. But look at TOP. Look at how many drives we had. Our defense came up with a handful of stops yesterday. This defense is not 'good.' But it's capable. But if you make it to where every three plays, they have to go back out there, they're going to give up yardage. You cannot depend on this defense to win you football games. It's got to be both sides of the ball. And with no offense due to our terrible o-line, the defense was hung out to dry, and gave up more than 30 points. Again. Victim 3.
Haley is being roasted today. "He quit." I never got that from the game. I got this. "If I sell out on offense trying to get us back in it, Cassel's going to get killed. I can't throw the ball because he'll get killed and it'll get picked off. My only option is to run the ball and try and wear down the defense, because right now, we're outmatched."
You can talk all you want about fighting like champions, or playing like men, or heart, or guts, or whatever. None of that will change the fact that yesterday at every position, the guy in green was stronger, faster, smarter, more experienced, and more talented than his opponent. But even then, we would have had a chance, just like we had a chance the previous two weeks. But the offensive line, against that blitz, failed miserably.
If you want to see me angry, or demanding something? I do have one. We watched offensive linemen slip by us this offseason. That CANNOT happen again. We have to either sign, or trade for, the best available offensive lineman, and we have to draft the best available offensive lineman. They have all got to go. Albert I'm okay with staying. He had a terrible game yesterday. But he's shown enough positives. The rest of the crew, including Waters? GOT. TO. GO.
Yesterday was a lowpoint, even for us. And I've come to recognize I was wrong. I wanted us to draft Bowe. I wanted us to draft Dorsey. I wanted us to draft Curry, Jackson. We should have been drafting linemen. And now we're paying the price.
We're going to start winning again. It may not be till after the bye. But it's simply too unlikely to go 0-16. "THE LIONS DID IT!" but that was an outlier. Just as, and I really want people to start thinking about this, the Dolphins were. All this offseason, I heard constantly "Yes, you CAN turn around a team in one season! Look at the Dolphins! LOOK AT THE DOLPHINS OMG THEY WENT 0-15 THEN MADE THE PLAYOFFS, WE SHOULD BE THEM! BE THE DOLPHINS, DAMN IT!" And now, we see in fact, the Dolphins were a mirage. They're 0-3, and haven't been competitive in any of their games. That's worse than us. It is a process. It will take time. We've still got some desert to go. But the oasis is out there people. And we can't turn back now.
But it's time to leave the offensive linemen to die in the desert. They're only slowing us down.
SHAMELESS SELF-PROMOTION: Ridiculous Matt, AKA MAWK, is the author of ESPN-affiliate NBA blog Hardwood Paroxysm, and a contributing writer for AOL FanHouse and BusterSports.com.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.
32 recs |
112 comments
|
Comments
What a breath of fresh air
I’ll refer to this post every game until something is done with that line. As everyone already knows, the best defense is to keep the other teams offense OFF the field. But it starts with the Offensive line and what we have IS an “Offensive” line!
Winning begins with Attitude - 2009 Chiefs 12-4
by Lanier63 on Sep 28, 2009 9:25 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Probably the best column I've ever read about the chiefs
I want you to take Whitlocks place. This is a good article that actually inspired me and made me proud to be a Chief. You’re exactly right. Haley realized that if he threw the ball he’d just get his QB killed. I think starting O’Callaghan will be great, and hopefully Goff can go die and then Ndukwe can take his spot.
by TonylovesKC on Sep 28, 2009 7:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
NA
It’s like pointing at a guy wearing a yellow shirt, and saying “Look, he is wearing a yellow shirt!”
Half the reason the line “sucks” is because there is no element of surprise.
Teams know when we are running, and they know when we are passing.
by HaySoose on Sep 30, 2009 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol....
the handicap pic describes your thoughts perfectly.
Chiefs FTW
by The_IT_Guy on Sep 30, 2009 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes, yes it does.
Pretty sad that a handicap guy can form more of an opinion than The IT Guy. Wish I could just copy and paste others opinions on this board, but then i would just be normal and boring, like yourself.
I bet you work on a helpdesk. All guys who write IT in their name do.
by HaySoose on Sep 30, 2009 7:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Touche
Nice Hay Soose :)
Still I think that LJ can play a role on this team as he can catch and block better than in the past. Charles should get touches and Savage and Battle.
All have something to offer the 2009 Chiefs. The play calling needs to utilize all as if they were the same and then the LJ is running will fade as he beats your OLB with a 30 yd catch and run.
We Will kick at least 4 Teams Asses in 09
And Succop will be the Key in two of them.
" Think and talk positive football off the field." Hank Stram
by Steve_Chiefs on Sep 30, 2009 8:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Awesome write up Matt!
Rec this one guys! I agree with you 100%!
by tomahawk44 on Sep 28, 2009 9:27 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I like to think that if we had, say, a Lesean Mccoy in our backfield...
He’d be able to screwdrive threw a lot of those tackles at the line of scrimmage and pick up positive yardage. It also seems like LJ has lost a bit of his vision, as well. That, or more likely, his legs can’t seem to carry him to wherever his eyes are tellin em to go.
But, if he had a hole to run through we may not be having this conversation. So, gonna have to go with the OLine. But we still need a quicker, speeder feature back.
"The first step to penetration... must not be lateral"
-Confucius, in contrary to Glenn Dorsey lining up in the 2-tech
by ArrowSpread on Sep 28, 2009 9:28 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Charles Needs to Start
LJ would be a fine back on a good team with a solid offensive line that creates holes but the problem with LJ is he can’t “create” plays. He needs to get two steps toward the line to get momentum due to his body build (long legs, straight up runner).
Our line cannot provide that. His vision is also fading.
Charles may fumble but he makes guys miss- period. He has the speed to get to the corner. It is his time, just like it was LJ’s time when Priest went down. I like LJ, I do, but this team isn’t built for his fading skillset.
by Ryan in Nixa on Sep 28, 2009 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you on Charles
in matter of fact I made a post on it last night if you want to check it out its called “The Case for Jamaal Charles”
by tomahawk44 on Sep 28, 2009 9:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ll Check it out. I’ve noticed for some time, that LJ had lost a step or two but it wouldn’t be as glaring on a team with a strong offensive line. On this team it’s the elephant in the room.
by Ryan in Nixa on Sep 28, 2009 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well..
I know we have a crappy oline but Charles seems to make a lot more plays than LJ and they play with the same line I just think we need that speed in there hitting the hole
by tomahawk44 on Sep 28, 2009 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's Not Just "Hitting the Hole"
LJ can still “hit the hole”, the problem is there is rarely a hole with this line. There are small seams and perhaps a linebacker sitting in the hole, that’s why you need Charles in there to make guys miss. He makes the first guy miss,
LJ’s biggest failing in his nice career is the fact that if he doesnt have momentum going forward to drive through a guy he can’t make someone miss. it’s not his “fault”, it’s not a lack of effort, it’s the fact his longer frame and running style are not condusive to it. He is a north-south runner that has good top end speed in the secondary but he simply isn’t great laterally and with this line we need a lateral runner.
by Ryan in Nixa on Sep 28, 2009 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
LJ excels at using blockers on the move.
Battle also has this knack. Trouble is getting the ball and evading the blitzer so that the flying lead blockers can do their part.
No question. Otis Taylor should be in the Hall of Fame.
by hmills110 on Sep 28, 2009 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Our other RBs are more hit the hole and make people miss.
With a good/great O-Line, LJ and Battle could give teams nightmares with those slow-developing plays that a better O-Line could provide them.
No question. Otis Taylor should be in the Hall of Fame.
by hmills110 on Sep 28, 2009 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, the problem is LJ.
He won’t hit the hole period. He gives up and is slow. He has no heart and won’t even try to get yards. If there isn’t a big hole he will just fall down at the line of scrimmage.
by TonylovesKC on Sep 28, 2009 7:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cant forget the D-line either....
Other than short signs of encouragement, the d-line to include our prize pick t. jackson looks as if their moving in slow motion. Everyone else is bigger and stronger, and we still give up the 3rd and longs. I dont think Haley knew how much work was really facing him coming her , maybe its too much for a 1st year coach…
by Sea of RED on Sep 28, 2009 9:35 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Jackson is a rookie DE
Like Dorsey of last year he needs playing time and experience. Don’t write him or MaGee off yet.
by mcclanahanman on Sep 28, 2009 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
the D line didn’t look bad.
The ILB play was pretty bad, along with the S.
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
by stagdsp on Sep 28, 2009 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The D line looked like shit...
no penetration…no pressure….nothing…they looked like shit.
Don't Fuccop Succop
by chicks_love_chiefs on Sep 28, 2009 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The D-line isn’t supposed to get pressure in the 3-4, they’re supposed to suck up blocks which is what they’re doing, Hali and Vrabel are supposed to get it done in the pass rush, the OLBs take care of the pass rush, the ilb’s take care of the run game and coverage, the D-line sucks up blocks so those linebackers can run free.
Did you not see Tyler getting triple teamed and double teamed all game? He’s doing his job, Dorsey is Getting doubled, he’s doing his job, Jackson has been getting single but he’s getting chipped, that’s 3 to five linemen/ and/or a FB/TE blocking the D line.
Left Tackles have been handling Hali our guy who’s supposed to get penetration and pressure. Vrabel hasn’t been getting there consistantly but he’s more likely to be back in coverage than Hali. We haven’t been blitzing, the chiefs are sitting back in a zone on most of the plays I’ve seen.
If the guys who are supposed to get pressure aren’t getting it done and you’re not blitzing how are you supposed to get pressure, if there’s no pressure there’s no sacks and your DB’s look like shit.
by mcclanahanman on Sep 30, 2009 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tyler has been decent, but he lost his starting job? Might not have been as dominating as everyone has been saying?
And honestly Dorsey isn’t really drawing double team that often. Dorsey and Jackson have both been man handled by whoever has gone up against them.
Don't Fuccop Succop
by chicks_love_chiefs on Sep 30, 2009 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe it's not too much for a 1st year coach
but just too much to fix in one year. i seriously doubt that if we had a different coach we’d be any better off then we are now. we’d still be bitching about the sames problems only we would be complaining that the proven coach we brought in might be losing his edge.
by Leaf on Sep 28, 2009 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jackson
What can you expect from him when he’s on the field all the time? I think he’s doing alright for a rookie and for having to always be on the field.
Sure our defense needs improvement, but the O-line is EASILY the worst part of this team.
by hawkrew on Sep 28, 2009 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I honestly am not looking for water. I was looking for water by the end of last year.
We are so bad, that any win we put together will be a fluke. We will not win by skill, talent, strength, speed or intelligence.
It will be by luck or misfortune by the other team.
Honestly I could care less about a win.
I want a winning team. I want a team that gasp might win 2 or 3 in a row, not in a season.
And no, I dont have the answers. I dont know what it will take to get us there. There are enough people who seem content to think they know everything involved with this team that we’re paying to find the answers, and it appears they’d rather be yelling at someone or not signing someone than to figure it out.
I blame everyone in this situation but Clark Hunt. He made 2 moves that we were physicked about, I dont think he could have known they would have been misplaced as they were.
But when 2 of the more “genius” people at the position in management, can mismanage this situation this bad, I dont see how you can not expect better, from them and the players.
For all we hear about shrewd evaluators, how could they not have seen our O-line was this bad all offseason?
I am more disgusted now with the Chiefs than I was last year, and that is alot, at least we could blame it on Herm before, and we still can to an extent, but its a whole new crew, and same result.
To Pioli-
Dorsey came into camp out of shape, he has sucked so far this preseason-
SHOP HIM AROUND!!!
LOOK FOR A GOOD YOUNG RT FOR DORSEY!!!
DO IT NOW!!!
by dbowechiefs09 on Sep 28, 2009 9:40 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Fluke....
Who cares if we win by flukes, I will take a win any flukin’ way we can get one! And when those flukin wins start stringing together, it will be a flukin’ season!!
by dragon6172 on Sep 28, 2009 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
when you practicaly purge the entire team
it takes time to repair itself. most of these guys have never played with each other before. you just don’t start playing as a team over night. it also doesn’t help that we play several of the best teams right out of the gate. it is sad that you are ore disgusted with the chiefs than last year. not because the team is any worse, but because you give up so easily. i’m more disgusted with the chiefs fans this year then i am with the team. we all knew this was going to happen. we talk about it in depth during the off season. some had a more optimistic view for the team (myself included), but we all said virtually the same things. this was going to be an ugly season, there were going to be growing pains, and the only game we even had a chance to win in the 6 was oakland. so why is everyone acting so flippen surprised. why is it that once the pain that we knew was coming starts everyone is so bent out of shape. everyone is acting like a bunch of teenage girls. “how dare i put my trust is this team. i should have never trusted pioli and haley.” i mean, seriously guys…AHHHH i better end this before i say something that gets me banned.
by Leaf on Sep 28, 2009 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Almost all
I would like to mark all the statements except Cassel, He has no time to look downfield because he running for his life every play.
by Digital on Sep 28, 2009 9:41 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with all but Cassel...and is it too late to ask Gailey back?
by FrankPitts on Sep 28, 2009 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boy this should get some conversation started
Gailey wasnt fired, but rather “de-moted” from his position as OC. Not many people have heard much from him since. What are the chances, this was all done to cover up some type of surgery or personal problems he had to take care of, and then he’ll be reinstated to his position soon? Just sayin :)
Winning begins with Attitude - 2009 Chiefs 12-4
by Lanier63 on Sep 28, 2009 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
God, I hope so.
Seriously.
Haley clearly can’t do both jobs and do them both well. Either get someone else to call the Offensive plays or give Haley that job full time and bring in someone else to be the Head Coach.
by JacinB on Sep 28, 2009 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Doubtful
I find it highly unlikely that there is some conspiracy going on with Gailey. I also find it just as unlikely that he comes back as OC.
But think about it, he is still getting paid a good amount of money, what’s the rush to find another job? Especially right now, where I doubt a lot of teams are looking for new coaches, both NFL or college.
by hawkrew on Sep 28, 2009 3:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
funny but...
I was actually hoping the start of our whole season was some sort conspiracy….like we blow the first few games so everyone thinks we suck the most & talk a bunch of crap, then suddenly in the next game we actually show up & play. Then we dominate the AFC West and move on in to soar passed the playoffs & into the Big game & taking home the trophy.
You know….like a sleeper team! A pool shark who starts out playing shitty until someone antes up some huge bet only to see the shark unleash & dominate the table.
Oh please…..let my fantasy come true!
by HeatherChiefsLvr on Oct 5, 2009 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
AND get better draft position...hmmmm
Don't forget to be an AP-vangelist...Tell A Friend...
by woodman212 on Oct 7, 2009 1:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, the offensive line is terrible...
..but we have really got to cut down the number of times we’re slow getting in play calls. Should never, ever, ever happen with a professional league. It’s happening several times a game. Let’s be honest – Haley is struggling with all of his duties. I think the lack of an offensive coordinator continues to be visible. Is that our number one problem? No, far from it. But… it’s something a team shouldn’t even have to think about.
I initially put us at 6-10 this year, but that was with an expectation that we would stop making critical mistakes. I don’t know that I can see any more than 4 wins at this point. There are two main problems:
1) The big, obvious one – the offensive line.
2) The defensive line has been below average, but shows some promise.
Doug Gottlieb is not a football expert by any stretch but he made a point going into week one which I thought was valid:
As an outsider, you can’t always tell which teams will be great in football, but you can tell which teams will be bad: if your offensive line can’t block anybody and your defensive line is easily blocked, you’re going to be bad.
One of the teams he singled out as an example was the Chiefs. I didn’t want to agree with him, but I’m afraid that I do.
by u2nspenserfan on Sep 28, 2009 9:59 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i agree
taking to long in the play calling. completely forgot about that.
i was thinking we’d hit the .500 mark but its not looking that way.
Proud Supporter of Tyler Thigpen.
by nfamous209 on Sep 28, 2009 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Honestly
I’m less worried about the d-line and more worried about the coverage in the middle. It’s horrifying.
The line in a 3-4 really is just mean to contain the gaps and let the linebacker get through.
Predictions.
1. Tank Tyler will end up surprising everyone and be the anchor of our line.
"...Said he couldn't go on the American way"
by Jux on Sep 28, 2009 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, but...
they’re not even doing that consistently. And if they are a good D-Line, even in a 3-4 defense, they should consistently get pressure on passing downs.
It all boils down to this: we’re a bad football team. Our offensive line can’t block seemingly for run or pass. Cassel hasn’t looked great at all times, but has spent a fair amount of time running for his life, which will make any quarterback look bad. Larry Johnson seems to be running hard again, but he’s getting swarmed behind or at the line much too often. Our offense needs an outlet receiver like Tony and we don’t really have one. Our defense is lacking playmakers at most every position but cornerback. Our D-Line struggles occasionally to just fill gaps, and often doesn’t get much push.
If we can shore up the offensive line, it can go a long way toward hiding several of these flaws. So far it appears we have two solid starters (Albert and Waters) and three guys who should be emergency backups.
by u2nspenserfan on Sep 28, 2009 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
blame the line
last year and this year. last year second thigpen got the ball he had d-linemen and backers in his face. same w/ cassel and croyle. i still think cassel had a few chances to throw something good and didnt. also play calling sucked ass. honestly running the ball on 2nd and 26 when u have no offensive line to help with the run. i dont care if ur adrian peterson u aint doin crap with our offensive line.
yesterdays game was play calling as well as offensive line. mostly the line.
Proud Supporter of Tyler Thigpen.
by nfamous209 on Sep 28, 2009 9:59 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
oh
ive never seen brian waters get penalized before. but this is like 2 games in a row he gets called for holding. kinda wierd. he still holding a grudge with hailey or what?
Proud Supporter of Tyler Thigpen.
by nfamous209 on Sep 28, 2009 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think so.
One of the announcers mentioned that Waters insisted they stay in pads on Friday because they had too much work to do. Haley had offered to let them practice out of pads. Sounds like Waters is stepping up, in practice anyway.
I also don’t agree with giving a pass to the defense because the OL is so bad. They are getting beat early in games, not just late when they are tired. In the 90’s we had anemic offenses and the defense was always on the field, but that was our strength. We won many games because the defense scored. That excuse has kind of run its course at this point.
I remember Dawson to Taylor, Kenney to Carson, and Blackledge catching the snap in his facemask. Seen it all...
by BinSC on Sep 28, 2009 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But
they held the eagles to a three and out on the first possession and had a few stops along the way. I’m not saying they played well, they didn’t, our coverage across the middle is abysmal and Brown is worse than Pollard (and I hated Pollard). But if the offense had at least let them catch their breath, we might have at least been within two scores.
http://hardwoodparoxysm.com
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 28, 2009 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would just point to the TE.
He was leading the NFL (I think) coming into the game. We have struggled with TE’s already, and we still didn’t have a competent plan to cover him. If you tell a team you are going to throw to someone and then do it at will, they just aren’t any good. The OL didn’t have anything to do with that. I understand catching their breath, but isn’t conditioning suppose to be a strength now?
I’m not sure Brown is worse than Pollard, but I think both Pollard and Page were over hyped by the past regime. That is quite obvious now.
I remember Dawson to Taylor, Kenney to Carson, and Blackledge catching the snap in his facemask. Seen it all...
by BinSC on Sep 28, 2009 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess my central point
is that the offensive line failed MORE than the other units, and helped contribute to their failures.
So if the offensive line is a -10, and the defensive line is a -5 and the secondary is a -7, if you remove the offensive line to a 0, you only get the defensive line at a -2, and the secondary at a -4. We still lose, but we lose by less.
http://hardwoodparoxysm.com
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 28, 2009 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Too much math for me.
I guess a loss by less is better? Holy crap, is that what it’s come to. Man we are really bad…
I remember Dawson to Taylor, Kenney to Carson, and Blackledge catching the snap in his facemask. Seen it all...
by BinSC on Sep 28, 2009 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
we are that bad.
http://hardwoodparoxysm.com
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 28, 2009 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
its so embarassing
Our Offensive Line is plain out embarassing for any chiefs fan. Went from an all pro-bowl line to the worst line in the NFL. IM SHOCKED that we didnt address the line with FA, or in the Draft.. Everyone, even todd haley knew our line was Crap hmm.. lets see how many sacks we had against us last season.. And yet they still go out and waste picks on our D-Line which is because of our 3-4 Personel Switch. damn we have 4 first round picks now up front, and where has that gotten us? Absolutely nowhere at the moment. Jackson, Dorsey, Hali, and DJ and yet we get no pressure, so why draft D-linemen? they take 2-3 seasons to mold into a decent player anyways… Offensive linemen are for sure things pretty much 90 % of the time coming out of the first 2 rounds.. So im puzzled. this line needs a complete Overhaul, even get Rid of Brian Waters.. hes getting old, slow and banged up.. and his energy levels have declined dramatically, Everynight ill be dreaming of a Godly O-line FA signing or trade
by klear on Sep 28, 2009 10:04 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The biggest problem was timing.
Herm was fired late, Pioli was hired later, and Haley couldn’t be hired until after the Super Bowl. He then had to assemble a staff of spare part coaches, and then they looked for players. Too late. Too much to do and not enough time to do it.
I would expect better progress on FA’s next year and I also expect a big turnover in the coaching staff. Haley had to hire whoever was available. Remember, they want Romeo Crennel as the defensive coordinator, not Clancy. Will be interesting to see if they get him.
I remember Dawson to Taylor, Kenney to Carson, and Blackledge catching the snap in his facemask. Seen it all...
by BinSC on Sep 28, 2009 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lets face it
our line wne t down hill fast beginning with the departure of Tait. They held their own for a couple of years until Roaf suddenly retired. Then Will Shields, and not once was serious consideration given to the O line through the draft of free agency. Peterson, Vermeil and Herm were more responsible than Pioli/Haley for this problem. We just have to see our way through it and find an answer once and for all.
Winning begins with Attitude - 2009 Chiefs 12-4
by Lanier63 on Sep 28, 2009 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Got me thinking, here
Yes, it does take 2-3 seasons to mold D Line and often LB’s into the players they need to become. And yes ,O Line can often come straight in and be pretty close to what they’re going to be.
It makes sense in a long term strategic view, the route that’s been taken so far.
Get the D Line (Tyson, for example) now. Get him developing.
Next season’s draft we start getting O Line, who are more plug’n’play.
By the time the D guys are hitting their stride, we’ve patched up the holes in the O Line and suddenly we’re a legit team.
The painful part of that development strategy is us being awful this season and maybe next, depending on just how deft Pioli and Co. are at talent evaluation and maneuvering around to sign the right people.
And with the ‘old vet’ signings we’ve had, I think there’s an understanding there that those guys are there to be capable (but not necessarily good) stopgaps for a rebuilding season, and provide some leadership / growth to the young talent we already have in place. These vets will be replaced over the next season or two as more roster moves are made.
I’m no qualified expert on these matters, but it looks like the front office are sowing the seeds first, that take the longest to grow. So that when the positions that are quicker to develop are filled, we’ll have a team that’s solid all the way through.
I hope I’m not wrong.
Chiefs - back in the playoffs in 2011.
by TRSChief on Sep 28, 2009 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions 4 recs
nice thought
it makes perfect sense in the long term strategic view. it’s like in chess and you are setting up a strike. the first pieces you move obviously are the ones that will take more moves to be in position. if done correctly all your pieces attack at the same time. i’m not saying this is what pioli is doing, because i obviously can’t speak for him, but if he is the mastermind everyone thought he was, then i expect that this would be his type of thinking.
by Leaf on Sep 28, 2009 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Best analysis I have seen of the plan in quite awhile Rec
We Will kick at least 4 Teams Asses in 09
And Succop will be the Key in two of them.
" Think and talk positive football off the field." Hank Stram
by Steve_Chiefs on Sep 28, 2009 4:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're right and...
There were some mistakes made in the offseason that have really throttled this organization in the near term. We didn’t have to draft O-line. We had the money and there was some available talent and we just didn’t go for it. There were some WR’s that also could have been had. Pioli has proven to be VERY good at signing guys for the short term contract. He just seems to have a problem with names that fly a bit ABOVE the radar. We could have done better this year. If we build confidence now, it will pay huge dividends over the next several years. We missed the boat.
Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!
by Buck'O on Sep 28, 2009 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Finally!
Im glad to see someone else who can understand what the front office might be trying to do.
To add to what you said about a long term strategy:
You draft , or trade for in our case, a QB ahead of your o-line.
it usually takes a couple years for a QB to completely grasp the offense.
by KC_MO on Sep 30, 2009 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We also have the Worst Center in the NFL
^———
by klear on Sep 28, 2009 10:07 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I still dont understand why we didnt sell our souls to get Pashos?
by MasterBlaster7 on Sep 28, 2009 10:16 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
We Tried
But Pashos was content to go somewhere else for LESS money, just so he wouldn’t have to play for the Chiefs.
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
by Texas Chief on Sep 28, 2009 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
who says the chiefs even wanted him?
Not sure he was the answer…
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
by stagdsp on Sep 28, 2009 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Succinct. To the Point. Absolutely the TRUTH. Rec'd
This has to be the best post I’ve read in a while. The evidence is overwhelming. the deterioration of this team has a direct relationship with the breakdown and breakup of the O-line. Until this situation is addressed, we will fail to achieve.
One other thing. How could our bright new shiny coaching staff fail to recognize this? Does anybody doubt that if we had spent our first three draft choices on Olinemen that we’d be better off now? Jackson hasnt been an upgrade. Cassell hasn’t been an upgrade from Thiggy or Croyls. The Dlineman in the third round hasn’t gotten on the field enough to be considered at all. This season is a waste of time. Here’s hoping that we spend our first and out two second round picks on Oline. We almost have to.
by Ozarks on Sep 28, 2009 10:43 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think the line of thought was something like this
They didn’t get hired in time to really get a grip on the FA situation, so they missed out on the slim top options. From there, I honestly think the thought process was something like this.
“We’d rather be HORRIBLE this year in pursuit of being great in the future, rather than finding a stop-gap and dealing with mediocrity that we’ve committed to financially long-term.”
The problem is that most fans in KC are not prepared to be HORRIBLE anymore. We want to be decent, and we want to be decent now.
http://hardwoodparoxysm.com
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 28, 2009 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Offensive line
Yesterday’s game did much to highlight the poor line. Too many instances where no Eagle was touched. Haley needs to beging integrating the back-ups since they can’t do much worse than what we witnessed yesterday. There is nothing else the staff can do at this time unless they begin passing on traditional running downs and use misdirection plays to throw the defenses off a little. Playcalling is an awful lot of the problem as well. The line is bad, but the coaches have to try something to help them.
by chief66 on Sep 28, 2009 10:57 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
TOTALLY AWESOME POST
And my favorite quote from it:
“We’ve still got some desert to go. But the oasis is out there people. And we can’t turn back now.
But it’s time to leave the offensive linemen to die in the desert. They’re only slowing us down.”
About the Chiefs: I'd rather be a realist than a pessimist
by Red N Gold Beast on Sep 28, 2009 11:14 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
OK
I don’t know if anyone else saw this but when Cassel had time to throw he was looking at the rush not at his receivers.
Yes the O-line stinks but with Philadelphia blitzing we should have been throwing behind the rush, when they’re bringing 8 guys someone is wide open. Three steps and throw, not five steps and freak out. Cassel is still in love with holding the ball too long.
Niswanger may stink as a center why hasn’t he taken Goff’s place at RG? I’m sure Alleman, could bring the same ineffectiveness at the center position and I’d rather have a young guy that sucks playing than an old guy that sucks. Open up the competition at RT.
Now our D line sucks………I saw Tank Tyler getting triple teamed, Dorsey doubled, Jackson started out getting doubled then released to one man and Hali couldn’t beat his tackle. Hali didn’t get it done at all in one on one against a pro-bowl left tackle. The other 3 guys were sucking up their blocks for the most part but Hali’s rush isn’t getting it done. The defensive line is sucking up blockers that’s their job, it’s the OLB’s job to make the sacks he’s not doing it. Our soft zone behind a four man rush got picked apart. I’ll almost guarantee that we take a NT in round 1 or round 2 next year and Edwards gets the axe.
We were throwing a four man rush on a lot of downs. With Tyler, Dorsey, and Jackson sucking up blocks why weren’t we blitzing more?
rounds one through 3 I feel should go NT, RT, OLB, and C, I don’t care which order. If Colin Brown worked out at RG in the offseason, maybe he’ll be our starting RG next year, Niswanger might make a nice guard, Richardson might. I expect a WR in rounds 1-3 though probably one of our second round picks.
Am I writing this team off already this season, no. At the skill positions KC has the talent to get it done. Baltimore and Philadelphia are both superbowl contenders and handed us our asses and we’re writing this team off already……
We found a way to lose to Oakland Will we do that in every winnable game, I doubt it. Cassel needs to quit watching tape on Warner and work on emulating him, DROP BACK AND THROW THE BALL, not drop back staring at the pass rush. If this line doesn’t improve we’re going to be depending on the short throws and our wr’s ability and athleticism to break tackles.
If Gonzo was here this year we might be 2-1 instead of 0-3. Who cares, this team is growing and being molded, once the scheme is tweaked to fit the players we’ll pull out a few W’s. We’re still 5 or 6 starters away from being a play off team, but those things take time.
by mcclanahanman on Sep 28, 2009 11:18 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
I agree with what your
saying but if we take a NT in round 1 or 2 I’ll be fucking pissed, we drafted 2 Dline with Jackson and Magee we better address the Oline Quick.
I still dont understand letting go of Herb he was a Good backup LT and I thought could of been our RT
Great players dont win championships.....Great TEAMS win championships
by DT58forever on Sep 28, 2009 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And this is a supprize?
Hali didn’t get it done at all in one on one against a pro-bowl left tackle. The other 3 guys were sucking up their blocks for the most part but Hali’s rush isn’t getting it done. The defensive line is sucking up blockers that’s their job, it’s the OLB’s job to make the sacks he’s not doing it
The writing for Hali has been on the wall for YEARS. Heali has been a bust as a first rounder since the day he joined the team. WHY are people so in love with this guy. He didn’t produce as a DE, and he’s not going to all of a sudden produce as an OLB.
I implore you to WATCH Hali play. You only have to watch ONE thing to see that he’s not gonna make it as the “key blitzer”. Watch his hips. He simply cannot turn his hips to change direction or compensate for a block. All the defender has to do is hip check Hali. THey don’t have to hit him hard, they just have to make contact. Hali’s hips get turned outside and he goes around the pocket on a long path to the QB. He simply CANNOT spin his hips back inside to adjust. He doesn’t have the ability.
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
by Texas Chief on Sep 28, 2009 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Too many hats for Haley?
The Eagles blitz well and in a variety of ways. How do you overcome that? The offensive coordinator needs to put in extra time game planning in order to prepare for it, then take the time needed to make sure the players know how to execute that strategy.
So what was our offensive coordinator doing this week? Also handling the media duties, overseeing the practice plans for the entire team, helping coach the QBs, meeting with the team’s GM and handling other head coaching responsibilities.
The o-line got beat physically and new players are in order. And I don’t doubt the effort of our offensive coordinator. But I have to wonder if the Chiefs are getting cheated out of adequate game preparation time by our offensive coordinator.
by sunny D on Sep 28, 2009 11:18 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't know if there was anything he could do.
Again, the way to beat that blitz? Run screen plays and quick slants.
Well, we tried the screen plays, and they got blown up time and time again because we couldn’t block and they read it every time. We couldn’t run the slant because our receivers couldn’t get separation.
I really feel like the O-line put Haley in a position where he was handcuffed while he was being flogged.
http://hardwoodparoxysm.com
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 28, 2009 11:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If screens and quick slants are all you try against the blitz, they can cover that.
You also just need to strap it on and beat someone over top, even if it’s a quick timing pass, and just let your WR go up and get it.
No question. Otis Taylor should be in the Hall of Fame.
by hmills110 on Sep 28, 2009 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lets not
forget we didnt have Bowe they had no one to key on our offense except Cassel he was the only “threat”
Great players dont win championships.....Great TEAMS win championships
by DT58forever on Sep 28, 2009 11:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no time
If you try a three step drop and just bomb it, you’ve got two problems.
1. No time for the route to develop so a higher probability of the coverage being tighter.
2. With no route development, you’re essentially running a go-route, which means if that safety is sitting in zone, it’s going to be a lob pass, which allows them to cover ground to recover, so you’ve got two guys on you.
Those problems lead to turnovers, which we all agree CANNOT happen. Additionally, we don’t have the speed or height or vertical at WR to go with jump balls. If we had Bowe, maybe. He’s good at jump balls. But we didn’t.
Otherwise, you’re talking about trying to wait for the route to develop to heave a long one, which means standing in the pocket while you get obliterated.
http://hardwoodparoxysm.com
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 28, 2009 11:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good points.
Except Bradley did pretty good on that timing route in the EZ yesterday. Possibly the only bright spot of the day.
But that’s the thing about beating the blitz. You have to have some sort of WR matchup edge, or you’re kaput. They can send the house on the blitz and sit on routes.
And if they have a safety or two sitting deep to prevent that, they’ve limited themselves on whom they can send on the blitz. You seem to be talking about a team with 13 or 14 defenders. I know it seems that way when the KC offense is on the field…
No question. Otis Taylor should be in the Hall of Fame.
by hmills110 on Sep 28, 2009 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
From what I saw
they were using either two LBs, or one LB and one safety, leaving the other safety in zone, or man if we went 4 wide.
I even remember us going five wide early and it resulting in a near sack and incompletion. That’s the biggest FU the Eagles could give. Blitzing when you’re five wide means they know they have nothing to worry about because they can reach you faster than you can throw.
http://hardwoodparoxysm.com
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 28, 2009 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with a lot of what you say...
and God knows I want a new line all together, but I can not find it in me to blame the O-line for stupid missed arm tackles in the secondary.
by dragon6172 on Sep 28, 2009 11:19 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
They didn't make them from the get-go
Remember, we got a fair share of stops. The one, terrible Desean Jackson play? yes, that was horrible. That was a combination of linebacker, corner, and safety blown coverage. But all in all, one of the things I’ve liked most about this year is that we tackle better. We’re not always in position, but we’ve been tackling better. That defense ran out of gas.
http://hardwoodparoxysm.com
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 28, 2009 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Failure in execution, on that Jackson play.
The LB was just a tick too late, but he was definitely playing to break that pass up, from the instant the ball was snapped. Good anticipation/preparation – just didn’t get there quickly enough. Still need to get a more convincing jam on the receivers.
No question. Otis Taylor should be in the Hall of Fame.
by hmills110 on Sep 28, 2009 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
why does Pendergast have so few votes?
has anyone seen the coverage he has our guys play? I mean, seriously!
by jonnyu on Sep 28, 2009 11:24 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
and you spelled desert correctly...which is one of the most misspelled words in the English language.
Good post…I pretty much agree with you except I’m not buying the Cassel was hurried crap. No one was more hurried in their career then Elway…(he was the most sacked QB in history by the way)…and this year Rodgers and Favre are leading all QB’s in sacks and hurries and they don’t suck because of it.
And no one has to run for his life more than Roethlisberger….but he still manages to be a top 5 QB every year despite it.
Good is good all the time not when it’s easy. Cassel needs to find the inner strength to excel in tough times as do all NFL players.
by krayfish on Sep 28, 2009 11:28 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
First off
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/desert
Desert. Not dessert. We’re not asking for ice cream.
Second, there’s a difference between the pocket breaking down and the QB having to scramble, a la Ben, Elway, Rodgers, and a LB being in your face on every single down, which is what we say yesterday.
Third, “inner strength”? Really? Come on, now. These guys are professionals. This comes down to ability, technique, and gameplanning, not “heart” and “will.” This isn’t a Disney flick.
Cassel made the right throws yesterday. Our line never gave him an opportunity to even scramble.
http://hardwoodparoxysm.com
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 28, 2009 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
wait, i'm confused
is the desert muggy? i thought it was dry.
Oh, sorry, was that not the point of this post? I must be on overload…
by thehulk on Sep 28, 2009 11:34 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
my bad
mixing metaphors.
http://hardwoodparoxysm.com
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 28, 2009 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My favorite part of the article
Haley is being roasted today. “He quit.” I never got that from the game. I got this. “If I sell out on offense trying to get us back in it, Cassel’s going to get killed. I can’t throw the ball because he’ll get killed and it’ll get picked off. My only option is to run the ball and try and wear down the defense, because right now, we’re outmatched.”
This is exactly what I was thinking when watching the game…well watching it until they took it off and put the damned Jets on.
by Kristospherein on Sep 28, 2009 11:46 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That's why I felt they were premature in going after a big $$$ QB.
I’ll tell ya, though. Watching the Sunday night game, where Indy scorched the Cards, gave me a different perspective on the Chiefs blowout, earlier in the day. I went a little easier on Haley in my mind, at least, after watching Whisenhunt and his crew face much the same situation – and I don’t think Arizona is a bad team.
I really liked Indy gettin’ after it with the blitz. A run/pass blitz. Love it.
No question. Otis Taylor should be in the Hall of Fame.
by hmills110 on Sep 28, 2009 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I apologize,
but I just cannot sit there any more on sundays and watch another loss. We have done it for years now, and it is not getting better. It is getting really hard to watch the games because I have very little hope left. I am always very optimistic, and the first to defend the chiefs to my friends, but I have seen very little to this point to make me think that better days are close by. I have loved these chiefs for decades now, and have seen bad teams before, but this, to me, is the worst. Maybe I am just extremely frustrated, just like most of you are, but I am finding it very hard to swallow this season so far. The little hope I have left still says, “there is always next week” but reality says it won’t be any different. Not trying to make anyone mad, just venting a little.
by dr. kill 4 on Sep 28, 2009 12:04 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
My brother calls every sunday evening ...
…and we discuss the game …amd then we get to the Chiefs. I’m tired of lying to him and lying to myself.
by FrankPitts on Sep 28, 2009 12:17 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Thank you for nailing it.
You stated what I have been thinking since last year. We HAVE to get our offensive line squared away first. Having a weak offense is much worse than having a weak defense or special teams. The dependencies are much greater. At least with a weak defense we could cover by out scoring our opponents with a high powered offense (2003 anyone?) , or special teams could crank off a kick return for a TD.
Everything cascades from how well or poorly the offensive line performs. We are spending too much time picking apart the skill positions as if they were the problems. They are the symptoms of the problem, not the cause of the problem. When the Qb has 3 seconds to drop, find a reciever and throw an accurate pass, or there are no holes to run though, of course they are going to look bad. So would Payton Manning and Adrian Peterson.
Yes, we can use upgrades at the skill positions, but they are not the root of the ineptitude we have seen.
Same for coaching. Haley has made mistakes in game calling and his ego needs to be reigned in, but give him the line Uncle Dick and Al Saunders had, and suddenly he is a genius.
Again, great job on the post.
by Spruce on Sep 28, 2009 12:20 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Well played, sir
Well played indeed.
Chiefs - back in the playoffs in 2011.
by TRSChief on Sep 28, 2009 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lord willing...
Don't forget to be an AP-vangelist...Tell A Friend...
by woodman212 on Sep 29, 2009 5:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great Post Matt...
this needs to be recd so all the frequenters to this site can read it
by Pontiaclvr on Sep 28, 2009 1:17 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I disagree with the last option
It has recently been shown that pulling out is as effective as using a condom (and much more fun). That answer should be revised to say:
The line. If they were contraceptives, they’d be “oh shit I shouldn’t have drank so much last night, hope she Summer’s Eve’d it”
Predictions for 2009:
LJ runs for 1800 yards
Bowe in the pro bowl
Chiefs D finishes in the top 10 in points allowed
Chiefs 10-6
by bonesjackson on Sep 28, 2009 1:46 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Pulling out is not an option for those of us
who have trouble getting in :) 22 years of marriage and its a rarity…lol
Winning begins with Attitude - 2009 Chiefs 12-4
by Lanier63 on Sep 28, 2009 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This isn't news. Not even close.
Huh. O-line play is limiting the Chiefs’ ability to run and to pass. Huh. Who’da thunk? And here I thought Cassel was solving all the Chief’s problems. Perhaps that explains why Cassel hasn’t exactly looked like an upgrade over Croyle. In fact, after three games so far, I think it looks more Cassel should be backup to Croyle. Certainly, scoring 24 points against the Ravens seems a bit more impressive than scoring 10 against the Raiders. You think KC might have beaten the Raiders with Croyle building on his Week One success, instead of bringing in Cassel before he was even fully recovered? I sure do.
No offense, folks, but I’m not drinking the Kool-Aid. If Croyle had spent the last two years in Cassel’s position (learning behind Brady, stepping into a contending team with a decent O-line), it would be Croyle who was the anointed savior getting signed for big bucks and Cassel who was being derided as “hick” and “fragile”. Line play wins championships. QBs aren’t injury-prone, the line in front of them is. Right now, Mike freaking Vick isn’t mobile enough to survive behind this line. A couple of years back, right after Croyle went down with a season-ending injury, I read someone on this very site suggest that his mother could have knocked Brodie out for the season. As it happens, I agree. I don’t think this line could have blocked his mother for three straight plays.
Bottom line: the Chiefs sent good money after bad. Signing free-agent skill players will never make up for a team whose core is weak. Those of you who think Cassel is something special, just remember what line he’s playing behind. You’ll be seeing Croyle as a starter before the halfway point of the season, when Cassel gets a knee blown out, and don’t be surprised if the first W of the year happens with “Brokie” slinging the spheroid.
by rco3 on Sep 28, 2009 2:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
dont forget how we got here
I remember a few years ago, AFTER the nfl draft, Roaf decided to retire. It was bad timing and I thought it was rude of him to drop a bomb like that on a franchise that grabbed him from Saints after his injury and pay him top dollar. Then the following year, Will Shields did the exact same thing! I’m pretty sure they both retired AFTER the draft. This posed a dilemma. We were unable to draft young talent. We grabbed Fatintosh! This has been a problem for about 5 years now. And our 4 qb’s have paid the price! Trent went down the first game of the year that Roaf didn’t play! Huard and Brodie both got beat down. I have a lot of respect for Huard! He was immobile as they come and he showed more heart than Brodie. But, regrdless, they both had no protection. And last year Thigpen was running for his life and now Cassel could be the next victim. So here we are. And after 5 years we have Brandon Albert to show for it. A college right guard playing Left tackle. This scares me. He would be a stud at Guard or Right tackle.
David Janssen
KC Chiefs Fan
by Mr J on Sep 28, 2009 3:27 PM CDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
I'm just sayin,
this seems pretty fox news-ish.
I hate potatoes because yada yada yada.
Poll
Potatoes suck.
Potatoes don’t suck.
You guys are better than this.
by just a guy on Sep 28, 2009 5:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Is this English?
Please explain your words and meanings.
http://hardwoodparoxysm.com
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 28, 2009 8:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
As always, just fantastic work.
However, one minor quibble. I’m sure it’s been brought up, but hell if I’m going to navigate AP commetns.
The Dolphins should have beat the colts. They were, at the very least, quite freakin’ competitive in the game. So, that’s unfair and incorrect. But other than that, right on. Spot freakin’ on.
by rockchalk on Sep 29, 2009 12:52 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Right On!
Best article I’ve read lately! I agree 100% our O-Line needs to be taken out and put out of their misery. I read recently that were looking at picking up one of the Packers injured liners, and I just cringe! We’re stuck now pickin at the scraps – we need to do just as you say, draft, trade and/or pay whatever it takes to bring some studs in yesterday!
by DieHardKC63 on Sep 29, 2009 10:36 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I have got a fever and the only perscription is more OL!!!
whe weren’t awesome cause we had priets.. we were awesome cause we had shields, waters, roaf, wigman(?)
by KC Masterpiece on Oct 1, 2009 10:23 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Welcome to my world
I have been calling this for a long time now.
The game starts and ends with the offensive line. Yes, I am biased, I played every position on the O line when I did play.
That doesn’t change the fact that without an oak solid O line, you have no offense.
I admit, I will be the first to praise my boys on the O line. I am also the first to walk up and call them out when they don’t get it done. The guys we are continually tossing into this line just cannot cut it. This Line has been gutted from one of the best in the league to a juco scrimmage team.
I only get frustrated when the Chiefs don’t do well. I take it personal when our own O line doesn’t step up and OWN that line.
Thanks for seeing things from my side of the ball.
Big Bear
by bigbearomaha on Oct 9, 2009 8:47 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I dont think this post was good at all....
No offense but this seems more like a rant to me. I think weve heard enough of these lately.
by darwithabar on Oct 11, 2009 1:00 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
aww geee
Truth hurt?
So, if it’s a blind eyed hurrah for losing, and good hearted " we’ll get em next time" it’s a post, if it tells the truth about the pathetic form this team is continuing on, then it’s a rant.
Not all of life, or football games, is going to be sunshine and roses. got to take the good with the bad.
This teams overall performance is abysmal. There’s no sugar coating it.
Dos that mean I am abandoning my team? Oh heck no. it means that I am disgusted with their performance, or lack of it and i don’t want to see em go out like this. Lying to myself and others isn’t going to change that.
Look at tonights game for a great example.
The O line was pathetic. might as well have put the cheerleaders in uniform and put them on the line, they would have played better. Where was the blocking? What happened to the run? Where do we look to see who just flat out isn’t performing?
This sorry excuse of wussie O Line. That’s who.
Direct comment tot the KC O Line players:
Have you no self respect at all anymore? Where are your heads, certainly not in the game. It is a position of honor to walk onto that field and make sure the backs can do their job because you are taking care of yours.
They play as if they have no cojones left.
The worse part is, the players in the backfield that might have a chance at getting some points scored and doing their jobs can’t because our offensive line is only offensive to their own team.
if this post seems vitriolic, I guess it is. At the same time, I am not being dishonest either. and that is just sad.
Big Bear
by bigbearomaha on Oct 11, 2009 5:59 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 






















