Chiefs Coach's Comments Revive Talk of Quarterback Controversy
Greetings from somewhere in Oklahoma on my way to Austin, TX for the first official Arrowhead Pride wedding (Chris, not me). I was traveling yesterday and, wouldn't you know it, the folks in the media tell me the Chiefs quarterback controversy has been resurrected.
No, no a new starter hasn't been named. It'll be Matt Cassel vs. the Philadelphia Eagles on Sunday. And, just to be clear, I'm going to steal a line from Josh Looney this morning to set myself up: "If you don’t read anything else in this blog today, read this next sentence. There is not a quarterback controversy in Kansas City."
But, it wouldn't be a Kansas City Chiefs football season without a little quarterback controversy, would it? There was the Gannon vs. Grbac decision in the late '90s (Decision? Depending on who you ask, there wasn't much of a decision and Gannon was flat-out the better option.). Then there was the Green vs. Huard situation in '06 that, um, well let's just skip that.
The 2009 version of this controversy is, of course, Matt Cassel vs. Brodie Croyle. We didn't hear much of anything about Croyle legitimately pushing Cassel until Kent Babb's Tweet heard 'round the world when he wondered whether the former Alabama QB was giving the $63 million man a run for his money. That was the first time we really started to pay attention to this. Prior to this, if you were like me, the thought really hadn't entered your mind.
Fast forward about five weeks and the same questions are beginning to crop up. This question from a reporter yesterday wouldn't be asked any other time unless there was a controversy brewin':
Q: Do you feel you are generally on the same page as far as the starting quarterback with Scott Pioli?
What they're trying to get at here is whether Cassel is truly the best option or if he truly has the contract that necessitates him to be the starting quarterback. The problem is that Todd Haley has demonstrated that he will play the best player, regardless of hype and money. The examples he cited yesterday in response to reporters:
- Jets: Vinnie Testaverde over Glenn Foley
- Cowboys: Tony Romo over Drew Bledsoe
- Cardinals: Kurt Warner over Matt Leinart
"Those are decisions you’ve got to make as a coach," Haley said. "As a head coach you take the brunt of the criticism or the accolades. You’ve got to ultimately do what you think gives your team the best chance to win. If that means another quarterback being in there other than Matt Cassel then…."
(The KCChiefs.com transcripts leaves off the last part "...then sign me up." )
He trailed off but I can help finish what he was getting at, "If that means another quarterback being in there other than Matt Cassel then...we'll make the switch because I'm fully aware that my future with the Chiefs is based off of wins and not the name on the back of the quarterback's jersey."
Personally, I love the competition being created in Kansas City. It's so simple yet makes so much sense. You're going to pushed to perform at a higher level when there's a guy behind you nipping at your heels. Hell, that's true in my job, why not in the job of a professional athlete? Ultimately, though, I'm not jumping from the Cassel ship. In the long run, he's a better option than Croyle in my estimation (and the stats back that up).
Bill Williamson of ESPN.com said that, while visiting Chiefs camp over the summer, he got the same impression.
"When I visited the Chiefs’ training camp in August, Haley praised Cassel," Williamson recalls. "He said he loves how committed to the game Cassel is and how he think he can become a special player. No matter what the talk is in Kansas City, I do not expect a change. And it does happen anytime soon, it would not be the right move for the Chiefs."
I think we've all seen and heard enough from Haley to know that he's the same guy every day. If he was asked this question in March, days after the trade for Cassel, he would say the same thing. If he was asked this question after OTAs, when Cassel was described by Babb as "the most accurate passer the Chiefs have had in a long time", he would say the same thing.
And now that we've finally got some game footage to go on, I don't expect him to change his answer.
1 recs |
12 comments
|
Comments
sounds about right
i will say though that even in those examples, the higher contract guy was given plenty of time and opportunities to improve before ceding to the lesser paid player. i think. im sure ill be told if im wrong on that.
he was injured. injured bad.
by troy145 on Sep 23, 2009 8:20 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
dumb
not having this conversation.
Cassel is the guy. period.
if he’s hurt, Croyle is the guy.
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
by stagdsp on Sep 23, 2009 8:37 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
This is silly
Cassell is the QB. He is leaps and bounds ahead of Brokie. It’s for Brokie’s own good he’s not out there being turned to jello again. The Raiders would have killed him if he was in—
by Ren on Sep 23, 2009 9:08 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Comparisons
I remember the Vinny Testaverde and Glenn Foley situation very, very well. Glenn Foley was probably the most similar to Tyler Thigpen of the QBs on this staff. He was this redhead guy with a lot of mobility, but very spastic in the pocket. I lead the team to a lot of 3 and outs. In fact Parcell’s first game as coach of the Jets was eerily similar to Haley’s first game as coach of the Chiefs. I do remember that much. I don’t remember what team they played, but the team held the ball for 40 mins to the Jets’s 20mins and everyone said the Jets defense sucked.
Enter Vinny Testaverde. He wasn’t spectacular, but he was a veteran QB that most of their fans, on a fan site like this one, didn’t want to give a chance to, because they felt he already had a career full of chances, and squandered them all.
But, Testaverde came in, and moved the chains, and that second game, the Jets had the 40 to 20 minute advantage, and they won (that’s the major difference). The defense looked brilliant. And another 11 wins later…
There really isn’t a scenario in there that is similar to Cassell and Croyle,mentioned above. Certainly not Bledsoe vs. Romo. I guess Warner vs Leinart would be the most similar, but not really. And I’d have to say Cassel was Warner, in that case.
This is all ridiculous, because Cassel is the much better QB here. But, if they are still winless after 3 more games, I could see Haley benching Cassel just to shake things up. It’s not going to accomplish anything, because Croyle is not a better option, but those guys straight from the Parcells coaching tree will try ANYTHING to stop negative momentum, no matter how odd.
by jcru on Sep 23, 2009 9:16 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Stop by the University of Tulsa Joel!
-Robbie
by Chiefsfan2012 on Sep 23, 2009 9:34 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
No comment
I refuse to even talk about this topic. As others have more eloquently stated, there is NO controversy. Cassel is our guy…
On another note though, hopefully you’re not typing these things while you’re driving. That would be very bad ju-ju! :)
"Every day is an evaluation and if you’re not out there how can we depend on you? If you’re out there and you don’t know what to do, how can we depend on you?" Accountability -- Haley-style...
by Chief_Elmo on Sep 23, 2009 9:37 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Haley's just trying to push Cassel
It was obvious. You can’t be discouraged by the way that Cassel played on Sunday as much as you really think he could have done better.
by jonnyu on Sep 23, 2009 10:41 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I dislike the "controversy" spin.
Fact is, if Cassel doesn’t win, his job isn’t safe. Nor should it be.
No question. Otis Taylor should be in the Hall of Fame.
by hmills110 on Sep 23, 2009 10:50 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
thats not fair
if cassel gives us a chance to win but receiver negate it wish drops, or the line wont block, or the RBs wont hit their holes, or the defense cant hold anyone, than it’d be silly to pin that on to cassel
he was injured. injured bad.
by troy145 on Sep 23, 2009 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think Haley is the type
who allows QB controversies. Did he have one in Arizona when he switched from Leinert to Warner? Maybe among the fans, but I don’t recall the team getting caught up in it. Despite what the fans and press say, it’s only a controversy if the Head Coach can’t decide who he wants to play. That means KC hasn’t had a QB controversy since Mackovic was coach, trying to decide between Bill Kenney and Todd Blackledge. You can talk about Grbac vs. Gannon, but Marty never showed any indication he was going to switch. To me that’s not a QB controversy, that’s just fans bitching the way fans usually do.
by Big Chief on Sep 23, 2009 11:41 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
This is such a joke
Matt Cassel is our QB. Brodie Croyle is a decent backup, but until that Baltimore game he has been god awful. He’s insanely inconsistent, and not even close to as good as Cassel. End of story.
Matt Verderame
by Flowers24 on Sep 23, 2009 1:28 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Matt Cassel will only be benched
If he starts going Jake Delhomme on our asses. As long as he doesn’t put up consistent 4 INT games, he’ll be fine. Even if they go 0-16, the job is Cassel’s. This is just nonsense. People love drama, so they try to create it out of NOTHING.
Penn State to Kansas City...Always a winning combination.
by YNinja on Sep 23, 2009 11:11 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















