Wait, Todd Haley Did Change the Chiefs Offense?
This post isn't meant to have much meat to it. It's just something I found interesting over the last week.
On the Wednesday before the Kansas City Chiefs season opener against the Baltimore Ravens, Todd Haley was asked how much the offense has changed since Chan Gailey was relieved of his duties and the head coach took over the playcalling duties.
"None, exactly what we ran in the third pre-season game is what you’ll see," Haley responded.
OK, what?
Sports talk radio shows were laughing about that one since we all had safely assumed the offense had changed quite a bit. Players, including Sean Ryan on the Chiefs Radio Network, talked about all the changes that Haley implemented when he took on the role of offensive coordinator.
Today, Haley was asked about the rust factor with Matt Cassel and shed some light on the offense that, according to him, hadn't changed at all since the third preseason game.
"We’ve made some pretty drastic changes around here offensively and that includes terminology and even though he was in the meetings it’s not quite the same when you’re out there and going through the huddle. I would say it set him back a little bit and he’s got to accelerate himself and study extra and put extra time in to catch up. But it’s a learning curve out there for everybody right now offensively."
[Emphasis mine] A week later and he lets it slip.
This post is just to demonstrate that coaches, especially Todd Haley, are well aware of the competitive advantages that a slip of the tongue can provide. Haley didn't want to tip off the Ravens to anything possible advantage and, like the decision to wait on Cassel until Sunday morning, wants the opponent to prepare for the unknown.
16 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
ha ha
off topic but over at PFT the emmitt “blowed out” was a popular comment, well…I was just watching ESPN, and Sterling Sharpe said the same thing blowed out, when talking about the panthers falcons game this weekend on playbook. dont think enough were watching to care or notice however.
I really liked the 3 man backfield formations
I think that formation with Thigpen in would give defenses all kinds of fits.
http://ajax-dj.mybrute.com
The way Haley was talking
He didn’t seem to rule that out. I got the impression that he had some specific packages for Thigpen.
by Joel Thorman on Sep 18, 2009 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions
Would you really want to see Thiggy pick up a block on Seymour?
Some would call that Sadistic :) little demonical laugh in background
Let's Kick some ASS in 09 or Die trying
by Steve_Chiefs on Sep 18, 2009 5:26 PM CDT up reply actions
Players on IR are still technically on the team. :)
http://ajax-dj.mybrute.com
by ChiefDJ on Sep 18, 2009 5:38 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
SO... are you saying
That Cassel maybe was held out against Baltimore due to vocabulary?
OR will be held out against Oakland?
Let's Kick some ASS in 09 or Die trying
Nope
Nothing to do with Cassel…just pointing out that last week Haley said nothing had changed with the offense when, in reality, it had.
by Joel Thorman on Sep 18, 2009 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions
I infered about Cassel's lack of playing it was injury, not lack of Vocabulary
to call the plays since the change in Offense
Let's Kick some ASS in 09 or Die trying
by Steve_Chiefs on Sep 18, 2009 5:24 PM CDT up reply actions
The same day Haley said not much would change...
There was an interview with LJ that said how different it would be. If the Chiefs can improve with Haleys offense as much as the Cards have sucked without Haleys offense we’ll be in good shape.
"Success is never ending, failure is never final."
When Haley said nothing had changed from the 3rd preseason game...
… he was being tongue-in-cheek. It’s one of those things that doesn’t translate if you just read it from a transcript, or even just hearing it on the radio.
The video of it was (and probably still is) up on the Chiefs’ site. He had a big grin when he said it. He was kidding.
of course he changed the offense
and the fact that he didn’t admit it initially is no surprise. Todd Haley is one hell of a boring interview.
How much CAN you really "change" the offense?
terminology yes, players yes, but when you get right down to it … it’s still a bunch of big guys up front trying to push other big guys out of the way so the littler guys can run with the ball
or big guys trying to block other big guys so the really little guy (if it’s Croyle) can throw the ball to some other guy
run, pass, block, tackle, kick … it’s football
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisiton!
Philosophy, Strategy, Scheme, Personel Packages
There is plenty that can change.
Check out some of the 3-4/4-3 posts here on AP and you’ll get an idea of how much all these things can change.
"The first step to penetration... must not be lateral"
-Confucius, in contrary to Glenn Dorsey lining up in the 2-tech

by 
























