Last Minute Chiefs Offensive Preview: It Might be a Bumpy Ride
Yesterday, I commented on the Chiefs' defense. They're on the right track and I think they'll be surprisingly decent. Great? Probably not. Decent? Maybe. Be forewarned that I don't have the same glowing reviews about the offense.
The Good:
Todd Haley. Can we end there? Haley will make this offense better. He's a bright young mind, he knows how to make a system fit his players' talents, and he knows how to get the most out of his players. That's one of the reasons I believe Pioli made the right decision when he fired Chan Gailey, although many would argue that it should have been done sooner. Gailey will get hired again and will do well wherever he lands, but he wasn't really a great fit for Haley's offense.
I also like the decision to go after Matt Cassel, even if that meant sacrificing a 2nd round pick and a long-term contract. I've heard many critics complain that Cassel is just as unproven as a Matt Stafford or a Mark Sanchez, and that's simply not true. I'm not going to pretend that his first season of success with an ultra-talented team is a predictor of future success. The place where Cassel is proven where Stafford and Sanchez are not is in the mental aspect of the game. That's not just talking about smart quarterbacks making good decisions. That's talking about a quarterback playing with his head screwed on straight.
We know Cassel can handle the pressure of playing in the NFL (let alone in a tough football market like New England). We know that he is committed to the game and has a "Brady-like" work ethic. We know that he has the confidence to shake off a bad performance. Those sound like fluffy comments, but think about how many ultra-talented quarterbacks have failed because they couldn't do some of those things. How many young quarterbacks have failed because they couldn't handle the boo-birds and critical media stories, and instead started pressing on every play? How many young quarterbacks have failed because they were just plain unlikeable? How many young quarterbacks have failed because they put a social life above a football life, a restaurant over an offseason workout program, an XBox over a film room? When you think about your quarterback, to use a popular movie reference, is he a guy who puts the bare minimum amount of flair on his jersey? These are questions you don't have to ask about Cassel. Not to say that either Sanchez or Stafford are bad kids. These are questions that are asked of any young quarterback.
The Bad:
Here's news that Chiefs fans already know, will deny to the death, but probably understand beneath the surface: the 2009 Chiefs offense is not going to be very good. The offensive line is patchwork, Dwayne Bowe is the only receiver worth throwing to, and who knows what to expect out of the running game.
I mentioned yesterday that Pioli treated the offense like a second-class citizen in comparison to the defense and I stand by that statement. I agree with his decision to build the defense first. That's what he's good at and I would rather have a dominant defense than a dominant offense, but here's something to consider. If a Defensive Lineman blows his assignment, the offense can break through for a big play. It sucks, but you live, learn, and move on. If an Offensive Lineman blows his assignment, Cassel could end up on a stretcher. The Chiefs did a great job of bringing in and securing Matt Cassel. You would think they would place a higher priority on keeping him safe.
And yet, the Chiefs used the first three draft picks on defense and showed pretty much no urgency in free agency to at least bring in some bodies to compete for a starting position. I credit Pioli for showing some urgency late in the preseason, though. The good news is that the offensive line was at least upgraded to serviceable due to some last minute moves (trading for Ndukwe/Alleman) and some good fortune (snagging O'Callaghan off the waiver wire). Maybe the Chiefs also bring in John Runyan, which could vastly improve the line. So in Pioli's defense, he got it right eventually, but it should have been a bigger priority sooner and we can't pretend that the right side of the line is anything better than adequate at its very best. I trust and hope that Pioli's learned that lesson, so it's not something to dwell on.
I also don't understand Pioli's logic for keeping a lot of insurance at quarterback, but not keeping any insurance for the guys that protect the quarterback. The Chiefs don't have a true backup left tackle on the roster. Their solution is to switch over Ndukwe in case Albert falls to injury. Really? So the guy protecting Cassel's backside could potentially be a guy who is playing out of position? Sure, they have Barry Richardson on the practice squad, but they risked him not clearing the waiver wire and, much more importantly, if Albert gets injured during any games, the Chiefs can't activate him until after the game. Why not keep a roster spot open for Herb Taylor or Barry Richardson in case of an in-game emergency? It doesn't make much sense to me.
I also worry that Haley is becoming too possessive of the offense. I like Haley taking over offensive coordinator responsibilities, but why don't the Chiefs have a Quarterbacks Coach? The Chiefs have four young quarterbacks with limited NFL experience who could benefit from a good QBs Coach who can devote all of his time into making them better. I want a QBs coach who can spot a flaw in the quarterback the instance it happens. I want a QBs coach who can train the QBs to develop good habits, both fundamentally and mentally. And if you're going to keep Tyler Thigpen on the roster, which I like, you need a QBs coach who can commit to teaching him better mechanics, better footwork, and a better grasp of a pro-style offense.
When is Haley going to have time to do any of that? And for every moment he spends coaching quarterbacks, is that a moment that he should have instead spent on gameplanning or handling some other head coach responsibility? I think Haley underestimated how much work goes into being a head coach, not just on the football field, but off of it too. I'm surprised he didn't follow Whisenhunt's lead and hire a young offensive coordinator who would help prepare the gameplans, but not call any actual plays. Remember, that's how Haley got his job in Arizona. I'm doubly surprised that the Chiefs to this day do not have a Quarterbacks Coach.
I'm not terribly upset with the state of the Chiefs' offense now that they're making some moves to upgrade the offensive line. I do hope that they'll respond by adding some additional pieces to the offensive coaching staff. On the bright side, the Chiefs have a good, young quarterback with a good head on his shoulders, and given Haley's offensive mind, the offense will be a force in due time. I can handle the fact that the Chiefs' offense might limp through the 2009 season; I just hope that none of it comes at the expense of developing a guy Pioli seems to think is the quarterback of the future.
72 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm sure the first thing Pioli thought when he was hired was
“We gave up how many rushing yards last season? You’ve got to be fuckin’ kiddin me!”
It’s simple, unless we fixed the run defense, we’d be lucky as hell to win two games in 2009. That was absolutely the first priority.
Ryan Succop will be the kicker for the AFC in the 2011 Pro Bowl
it was a priority... and it looks like they may have gotten it fixed.
From what I can see… this team can run the ball, and stop the run.. that gives me reason for hope
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
True that
I agree with Yoon, the writer of the article. Build the D first. Especially when they gave up an average of 160 rushing yards a game. A mobile, durable QB (which Casssel is) should have be able to survive behind this JV offensive line. The awkward tackle that Cassel got against SEA was unfortunate, but it forced Pioli into panic mode, and he’s now trying to throw mud against the line and hop it sticks. It’s kind of funny that every fan has been screaming about the OL for the last 4 years, and Pioli walks in and mostly ignores it. I’m all for him trying to correct his mistake though. It’s nice to see he’s not like Carl Peterson, who would sit back and let his QB get killed.
by Red N Gold Beast on Sep 10, 2009 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions
Agreed with much of this, Jon
And yet, the Chiefs used the first three draft picks on defense and showed pretty much no urgency in free agency to at least bring in some bodies to compete for a starting position.
That’s the thing…if he had went offense with that then we’d be killing him for not addressing the defense. Let’s face it, this team was so devoid of talent last year that he couldn’t win.
Regarding bringing bodies in, I think Pioli would reference something along the lines of building a team for the next decade, and not one for the next 2-3 years. Start it in the draft.
Nice thoughts.
Could have gone O in the draft
and D in free agency. A lot more talent was available out there for the D.
by NJ Chiefs Fan on Sep 10, 2009 8:35 AM CDT up reply actions
My point is
That FA usually isn’t the way to go to overhaul a team (and we can both admit both sides needed to be overhauled)…besides, how many 3-4 personnel FAs can there be? I think defense in the draft was the right way to go, but I understand the argument for offensive line (and protecting the investment).
by Joel Thorman on Sep 10, 2009 8:38 AM CDT up reply actions
I didn't mention 3-4. =)
I really think 4-3/ 3-4 is six of one… Both have advantages and disadvantages. If that weren’t the case the trendy system wouldn’t swing back and forth.
I beleive our D is better than last year, but I beleive our D would have been better than last year if the only changes made were to draft Curry and get a DE through FA. Throw in some short term depth via FA or late in the draft, and that leaves you with high round picks for the O.
Water under the bridge, but it could have been done. It was possible to address both sides of the ball. I think it would have been better for this year, but who knows what’s better for the 5 years after that (Pioli, I hope).
by NJ Chiefs Fan on Sep 10, 2009 8:57 AM CDT up reply actions
He could have moved more quickly to address the line though. I think that's the issue.
It was no secret that there was a problem at RT. That should have been handled before camp started so, we would’nt be going into B-more with a line that has only been together for a week.
It’s like we are now cramming to get prepared for a big test.
by Chiefsfan1970 on Sep 10, 2009 8:44 AM CDT up reply actions
With what?
It’s still a business and they apparently decided the best avenue to take was waiting until after week one to sign a player so that in the event he gets cut you’re not entitled to guarantee his entire 2009 salary.
Bottomline: If a vested veteran is on the roster week one, and cut later in the season, the Chiefs owe him his entire 2009 salary. If he’s signed after week one, we’ll only owe him 4 weeks pay if he’s cut.
So, it’s a major advantage to to wait until after week one. That’s why Jon Runyan, Langston Walker and Levi Jones haven’t been touched thus far.
by Joel Thorman on Sep 10, 2009 8:46 AM CDT up reply actions
Especially when those vested veterans
Have injury issues. Levi Jones has a history of injuries and Jon Runyan is coming off of surgery, so if I were in Pioli’s shoes I wouldn’t be banking hundreds of thousands, or certainly not millions, on them staying healthy.
by Joel Thorman on Sep 10, 2009 8:48 AM CDT up reply actions
Some fans forget we have spent the least amount of money on players...
That is to say we are the way under the cap limit, farther than any team in the league…quit being such tight asses.
1970 is right we should have addressed at least the RT position before camp considering the two guys battling for the job BOTH lost. That was pretty obvious to any fan who watched the team last year, we needed a new RT.
Did we have to draft the RT of the future?…it would have been nice, but picking up even an average RT would have gone a long way in protecting our 63 million dollar investment.
Apparently I’m not the only one that thinks so…I am a little suprised that almost as many fans are dissapointed as approve of the players Pioli has picked up, and even more think he did a so-so job. I voted so-so, I’m not so much dissapointed because I’m sure it’s not easy getting top quality FA to come to a 2-14 team in the midwest (World class BBQ or not.)
by chicks_love_chiefs on Sep 10, 2009 9:22 AM CDT up reply actions
Uncapped year coming up.
It’s going to be totally awesome when Hunt and Pioli look like geniuses because they have shit tons of cash just waiting to be spent during the uncapped free agency. While other teams have to realease solid veterans because of contract cost issues, the Chiefs, who have continually been way under the cap for about 3 years now can start throwing money at big name players. Build for the future… save for it too.
by Red N Gold Beast on Sep 10, 2009 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions
That's why you don't sign anyone unless you are sure they will be able to help.
And lets face it, you don’t have to be Willie Roaf to be an upgrade over our current O-linemen.
by Chiefsfan1970 on Sep 10, 2009 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions
Really?
Who was out there in terms of OL earlier. There were no proven bodies. As it stands we have guys who are adaquate and might develop into more than adaquate.
Jerome
Love the optimism...
But common man, the right side of the line is FAR from adaquate. It’s borderline pathetic. Granted we might have two pro bowlers on the left side, but if teams cut throught the right side like butter what good does is a great left side?
by chicks_love_chiefs on Sep 10, 2009 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions
Yep.
And the defenses on our early schedule are going to exploit that in a big way. These guys are going to have to improve VERY quickly.
by Chiefsfan1970 on Sep 10, 2009 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions
Couldn't agree more.
Why not keep B.Rich? He won the RT spot outright IMO, and put Belcher or Walters on the Practice Squad. If you wanted O’Callaghan instead of H.Taylor that’s fine with me but Ndukwe at RT is scary.
I was surprised by those moves as well
but, I think it’s clear that they have a plan to bring in more help at OL.
It looks like Ndukwe and O’Callaghan for game 1… but they won’t be alone by game 2.
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
This reminds of Phinisee.
J. Phinisee won the punt returner job outright and then Peterson cut him and signed E.Drummond who fumbled the first punt of the season, the rest is history!
Oh my god
Drummond was truly horrible. Assuming he caught the ball, he seemed to look for the closest player on the opposing team and run directly to him.
by Scaryclouds on Sep 10, 2009 8:36 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
OMG Drummond was so terrible...
It was really hard to watch that slow mo-fo run vertically for 3 yards every time.
by chicks_love_chiefs on Sep 10, 2009 9:24 AM CDT up reply actions
Justin Phinisee
Memories! I also remember this.
by Joel Thorman on Sep 10, 2009 8:39 AM CDT up reply actions
Wow
I forgot all about him. Good call though. Drummond really stepped it up in the area of suck.
by TheScootness on Sep 10, 2009 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions
I don't think anyone is saying that
And I don’t think Jon is saying that.
On the flip side, I think it’s funny how people blow off every move made by the Chiefs as the right one because Pioli and Haley wouldn’t have a job unless they were deserving of it…
by Joel Thorman on Sep 10, 2009 8:44 AM CDT up reply actions
I just think we need to see how the team does in the regular season
before we start complaining or thinking something should have been done better. I think Pioli has done enough to earn our trust going into his first season and I like Haley’s approach and attitude. I can see a difference in how the players have responded. Polls like that are really not necessary before we’ve seen what this team can do this year. Is it just me or does this defense look a hell of a lot better than last year? If our fans were running the team you can be Tyson Jackson wouldn’t have been picked..
There is also something to be said about overpaying for stop-gap free agents
That’s not “building a foundation”. Cheap veteran leadership is another matter though. Seems like that’s the only move people would have to be advocating in criticizing at this point. “well we could have signed so-and-so” .. yeah whatever.
Stopgaps are okay, if that's exactly what they are
I agree with you on spending for the sake of spending. I think you’re talking about an entirely different story when you’re talking about stopgaps. I don’t agree with throwing a humongous contract at an average veteran. But I’m more than happy to throw a short-term, 1-3 year contract at an aging veteran who only needs to give you 1-2 years of service until you find a replacement. That’s even true for an injured veteran like Levi Jones. If we can get 8 games out of him, that’s still much better than 16 games with McIntosh.
It would be one thing if a stopgap was preventing a young, upside player from hitting the field. A guy you expect to improve and who might potentially improve to be a reliable starter. That’s not the case here. All our current options going into the preseason on the right side of the line were limited upside players.
The Chiefs knew their options going into the 2009 season on the right side of the line was pretty lousy. They had more than enough tape to justify that. And based on their recent flurry of activity, it’s safe to say that they understand that now. They had plenty of opportunity to get better without breaking the long-term bank—how hard is it to upgrade from a pile of crap?
I voted disappointed.
The problem I have I have about this issue with the offense is the fact that personnel-wise, we didn’t need an overhaul, just a tweak here and there, specifically on the line.
Other than the addition of Matt C., this offense hasn’t changed that much.
I have no problem with the personnel we have now, especially if we get Runyan. I just think it should have been done two months ago as opposed to now.
yeah...
it is somewhat concerning that the RT spot is still up in the air as the season begins… when it was pretty obvious that something had to happen.
I agree that a couple of tweaks were needed… another WR, RG and RT, and stability at QB…
- well, I guess the WR help was Engram, Copper and Lawrence … the jury is still out, but they have to be better than Jeff Webb and company
- RG… Goff, Alleman Ndukwe… jury is still out, but they have to be better than Jones was
- RT… O’Callaghan, Ndukwe and Runyan? Walker? Brown?… work in progress
- QB…. Cassel, when healthy, pretty much solves the QB issues, I think
The other tweak is the play calling, which should be good with Haley at the helm
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
Agreed
I LOVE the Cassel pickup. He is going to be great for us as well as the play calling. That’s all good.
As for the rest of it…we’ll see.
by Chiefsfan1970 on Sep 10, 2009 9:12 AM CDT up reply actions
Run game
You didn’t mention the strength of this offense… the running game.
For all the press given to the pass blocking struggles, the OL quietly has done a pretty good job blocking for the running game, and that should continue to improve.
LJ is poised for a good year, I hate to admit… and Charles will make some big plays this year.
I think this is clearly an offense that will live and die by the running game, and early indications seem to be that they CAN run the football. They’ll get stuffed on a few runs, but they’ll break some long runs at other times.
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
Re: Run game
Good point about the run game. I do think our running game might improve. O’Callaghan isn’t a great pass protector, but he is a decent run blocker. One of the ways to protect Matt Cassel is to give him a good running game to lean on—that’s how Ryan and Flacco saw most of their success. Personally, I think that the strength of our pass protection is going to force us to go shotgun more often than not, so I’m not entirely sure that LJ will be the difference maker. But I think that this offense could be a great fit for Jamaal Charles.
Agreed
Wouldn’t be surprised at all to see the shotgun/cutback type running we saw last year. Go with what works until we can get the pass protection fixed.
by TheScootness on Sep 10, 2009 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions
They have a big test to start out so, I hope you are right.
If we can run against Baltimore, I will feel GREAT about the run game. If we can’t run effectively, it doesn’t mean much because we won’t be facing that defense every week.
Good way of looking at it
No reason to panic if the run game doesn’t produce against Baltimore. But if it does somehow….definitely a reason for optimism IMO.
by TheScootness on Sep 10, 2009 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions
Very well written post, and I like a lot of what you said.
I don’t want to sound like a ass but the “in Pioli we trust” gets me mad every time I see it, our owner was one of the main men that made the NFL what is is today. Yes we have NE people and we are doing some things the NE way but we are still KC. When Pioli was first hired that phrase was said around here but people put a stop to it fairly quickly.
We have to deal with the media comparing us to NE all the time, it has been nice to have this place with true Chiefs fans and true Chief pride that don’t copy the NE fans.
Chief fans are the best in the league and that has been proved by being a smaller market but we have still made Arrowhead a place that intimidates other teams. We have had a few dark years but there is light, like my name says it’s time to bring back the glory days of the Chiefs.
Herm is gone things are better with that one move!!
by bringbacktheglory on Sep 10, 2009 9:06 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
PLUS
one hundred, thousand, trillion!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Rec’d
Great players dont win championships.....Great TEAMS win championships
" In Pioli we trust"
Kind of pisses me off too. He has done good things but, not every move has been great. I will take a wait and see approach on both Pioli and Haley. So far they are doing a fine job but, then again, the season hasn’t started yet.
You won't want to blindly support anybody - nobody's perfect
I think he earned enough accolades in his career though to deserve our support going into this season. Some people are going as far as saying he’s no better than Carl Peterson and it’s Belechick that was the true genius. Such statements anger me dearly.
I wasn't knocking Pioli.
I think for the most part he has did a good job.
I just don’t like the “in Pioli we trust” phrase, that is taken from the NE fans and IMO we are better than that.
Herm is gone things are better with that one move!!
by bringbacktheglory on Sep 10, 2009 9:20 AM CDT up reply actions
I dont really like "In Pioli We Trust"
It reminds me of how we blindly believed Bush and (at first) supported bullshit wars..
I don’t really mind the NE comparisons….wtf why not? I’d love for the Chiefs to be the dominant team for the next 10 years. I hate to say it but the Pats have done more since 01 than the Chiefs have ever done.
by chicks_love_chiefs on Sep 10, 2009 9:29 AM CDT up reply actions
don't get me started about Obamacare either..
I’m a libertarian though so what do I know.
the libertarians are the only ones worth listening to
everyone else just ignores the people and plays the game
it helps that they actually have knowledge and believe in the constitution
so if you cant tell, I am one too (libertarian)
by chiefsandcigars on Sep 10, 2009 9:58 AM CDT up reply actions
Thats a problem if you think only one party is worth listening to.
I tend to listen to all major political parties, its much easier to sift through the crap when you know all the different points of views. Im an independent, i don’t follow party lines i follow my convictions.
Don't blame me, I voted for content of character.
by paratrooper on Sep 10, 2009 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions
I have tried to listen to everyone
but I am so sick of politicians. Both of the major parties speak out of both sides of their mouths all the time. There are libertarians that do the same thing!! You are right to suggest to listen to them all, but they are mostly liars and cheaters. Once you believe one is a liar or cheater, you tend to pay less attention to what they have to say after they have established that kind of character.
by chiefsandcigars on Sep 11, 2009 8:41 AM CDT up reply actions
Afghanistan is a "bullshit" war?
That’s news to me. It seems that all the people who are bitching about following Bush blindly have done the exact same thing with Obama. Now people are starting to open up thier eyes and see Obama is not the savior that he was portrayed to be. I guess he is doing a good job if you believe his record spending is hope and change that you can believe in…..
Don’t get me started on obamacare either or on the American Recovery Act. Unemployment is creeping to 10 percent….tick tock tick tock.
Don't blame me, I voted for content of character.
by paratrooper on Sep 10, 2009 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I love how liberals argue.
Bring some facts that show Obama>Bush, Don’t just say it. Back your argument with some substance.
Don’t automatically assume that i am a Bush fan just because I think Obama is a joke. As a matter of fact, I strongly disagreed with Bush on most of his policies, so don’t try to pigeon hole someone. Now if you would like to have a informed and intellegent debate over the current state of our country im all for it. But please bring more firepower than Obama is better than bush because i said so kind of stuff.
Don't blame me, I voted for content of character.
by paratrooper on Sep 10, 2009 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions
To me
its sounds kinda gay…..this isnt a mob this is The Kansas City Chiefs baby!!!! we need to give him a chief name……I cant think of anything catchy right now we will call you “one who builds dynasty” or “running wolf” lol jk but seriously somebody think of something
Great players dont win championships.....Great TEAMS win championships
by DT58forever on Sep 10, 2009 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions
I don't think there's any doubt Pioli runs this team unlike anything we've ever seen
He’s not afraid to send you packing (something tells me King Carl wouldn’t have cut Sackintosh – Pollard) makes moves and this link should get everybody pumped for the regular season!! : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfSfK0AMWlc
Too much second guessing. There are so many things that we are not aware of
that are big factors. Pioli obviously knows what he’s doing, when the best time is to spend the money, and when not to, etc. Any negative input is just that. It’s fine for all of us to have our opinions, but to be second guessing at this point, really isn’t very productive.
Stop whining about the "In Pioli we Trust" comments
And be glad we got him. You should be thankful. Christ. It’s just a show of gratitude and support/appreciation. Get over it.
We don't really have much of a choice, do we?
by Chiefsfan1970 on Sep 10, 2009 9:41 AM CDT up reply actions
So you get upset because I don't want to steal a phrase from NE fans?
Please read what I wrote before you get all pissy, I never said I didn’t trust or support Pioli.
Herm is gone things are better with that one move!!
by bringbacktheglory on Sep 10, 2009 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions
Looking back
When Pioli and Haley were brought in, just before the draft no matter where you looked the Chiefs greatest need was the Defense, mainly the line. Go back and look at the post from the draft and before we were all more worried about the defense. While I do agree the offensive line was a known problem, I think Pioli and Haley both were thinking draft defense and get veteran help for the offensive line. Both sides take time to develop the rookies and at the time of the draft with the switch from the 4-3 to the 3-4 that we really didn’t have the players for it made sense to go the direction they did. Both Pioli and Haley knew that Cassel would need protection and I believe that they were looking for someone proven to protect the QB rather than going for a rookie and hope that he develops. As I have said a few times, I do not thing Pioli and Haley are done with the roster I believe we will be looking to up grade every position all the way up to the trade dead line this season and every season here after.
Pioli and Haley are taking the steps, No we won’t wow anyone this season or even next season. However I think after that the Chiefs should be expected to be in the playoffs and even be a Super Bowl contender. It is not going to happen overnight and if it did could it be maintained? Only time will tell.
is it me? or isn't about time the Lamar Hunt trophy belonged to His team?
I’m a Chiefs fan Dammit and I’m damn proud of it!
Pick your poison.
This team was full of holes last year and there was no way we could have fixed both sides of the ball in one offseason. Our D was god awful last year, while our O was average at best. In a perfect world we could have drafted and signed enough quality players to complete our roster. But thats just not the case. If our D has a big turn around and decent showing this year, you can bet that Pioli and crew will be looking at upgrading the O through the draft next offseason. Rome wasn’t built in a day. Lets have a little patience.
Don't blame me, I voted for content of character.
Pick your poison. But... place your priorities
I agree that you can’t do all things at once. The only reason I took issue was that the offensive line’s job is to keep your quarterback off of a stretcher. If you have problems on your defensive line, it makes it painful to watch, but that’s about it. If you have problems on your offensive line, you could lose your quarterback.
The Chiefs bought a fancy car when they brought in Cassel. But they’re playing without insurance right now.
I think they did place thier priorities.
Our D was the laughing stock of the league last year. Pioli had to of cringed when he watched our D on tape. Im sure he watched plenty of tape on the O and decided that we can do some things there but with out any D we have no chance of winning any games this year.
Cassel will be fine. We won’t be taking 5 and 7 step drops all the time. We will be a run first offense. Screens and draws will be used to slow down the pass rush and after we force the D to stay honest we will take our shots downfield IMO. This is not going to be the 08 Cards O.
Don't blame me, I voted for content of character.
by paratrooper on Sep 10, 2009 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions
Rome wasn't build in a day but the 08 Dolphins were...
It’s not fair to expect Pioli to fill evey hole with an all pro, but it’s not unreasonable to except him to at least address every hole on the team.
by chicks_love_chiefs on Sep 10, 2009 10:11 AM CDT reply actions
It seems to me
that Pioli did address every position on the team. I can not think of one position that he did not bring in somebody to look at. Just because there is a week link somewhere doesn’t mean we can fix it buy throwing money at a big name vet. Throwing money around barely ever solves any problems. Look at our schools and our economy if you need any proof that overspending rarely works.
Don't blame me, I voted for content of character.
by paratrooper on Sep 10, 2009 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions
Hell
you can look around the NFL and see it doesn’t work. How good are the Skins or Cowboys? They spend a crap load of money and where has that got them recently?
Don't blame me, I voted for content of character.
by paratrooper on Sep 10, 2009 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions
.......and the 09 Dolphins will probably fall....they sure won't be 11-5
Pioli has addressed every hole on the team and has improved all aspects, except TE.
Agree
The 08 dolphins also benefited from a relatively new offense, the wildcat, and will probably be 1 year wonders
Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes; after that, who cares?! He's a mile away and you've got his shoes!
by SuperTurtle on Sep 10, 2009 10:44 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Pioli has addressed some holes but...
To say he’s addressed the OL is a bold faced lie. TE, WR, FB are others that could and should have been addressed.
by chicks_love_chiefs on Sep 10, 2009 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions
How is it a bold faced lie?
Several additions have been made to the OL. Hell, we are looking at Runyon right now.
This isn’t Madden. You can’t just go sign all the guys with ratings of 90+ and trade away all of your draft picks to fill your rostor. Things take time.
Don't blame me, I voted for content of character.
by paratrooper on Sep 10, 2009 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions
The issue is that when you have a bunch of “50’s”, it’s not hard to bring in at least a “60” as a stopgap solution. Again, I have no problem going with a “50” at receiver or linebacker or safety. I have a big problem going with “50s” on a player who is responsible for protecting the quarterback.
The point most people are making is that they’re starting to finally make the right decisions on the o-line, but why did it take so long? As it stands, even if they sign Runyan, he’s not going to be prepared for the Ravens game. Our offensive line was set back for a few games because we didn’t act quick enough to solve those problems until the last minute.
What players
should we have went after early in the offseason? Who was availible and willing to come to KC?
Don't blame me, I voted for content of character.
by paratrooper on Sep 10, 2009 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions
I Hope Cassel can RUN!!!!!!!!
If he can’t scramble and slide when it is time he is gonna get killed. Pioli should have done something with the O-line. It looks terrible.

by 



























