Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Amateur Mathematics Of Linsanity

The Tyler Thigpen conundrum

As an odd day in itself, I'm sitting at work actually doing work for once when I take a break to check out what's happened in Chiefs world, and low and behold I see Tyler Thigpen trade rumors. It got me thinking back to last season when he was forced to play QB for one of the worst teams in the league, with one of the worst defenses of all time, and did, well, good enough to be an option for the guy who took Tom Brady in fantasy football.

Thigpen didn't win us any games, sure. But he sure as hell didn't lose any for the Chiefs either. He did what he had to do to move the chains, and score points field goals touchdowns, which for our Edwards coached team, was rare.

So why would the Chiefs want to trade him?

Star-divide


We all know Tyler is no pro-style first string quarterback. He's more like the poor-man's Mike Vick, only without the prison stint, marijuana use, and underground dog-fighting rings. The guy is just a damn natural athlete who can run, catch, and throw: He's the new prototype wildcat player.

Haley is talking about how they're going to have to scrap to win games. Gailey showed his ingenuity for making things happen, and Thigpen showed he could improvise enough to move the chains and score points. On a team that's admittedly going to struggle according to the head coach, why move a guy who can bring another dimension to your offense while stealing time from the opposition wondering "what the hell are they going to do when this guy is in there?" Seems to me to be a bit short-sighted.

That makes me worry a little bit about Haley and how he wants to run this team. I see it as a little Herm-like stubborness offensively. You work with what you have, not what you want, right? Well the Chiefs don't seem to have a pro-style capable offense as evidenced by last season, and it's not looking to get better immediately. So why move possibly the ONE guy that can completely change the scenery of your offensive strategy? Thigpen can play WR, RB, or QB. He can be all three at once. Two back set with Thigpen and Johnson? Direct snaps to Thigpen with Cassel in the shotgun? Thigpen lined up as a WR?

Now, I'm not saying there isn't a value in a trade where you can't pull the trigger, and I think Pioli is asking the right price for Thigpen. A 4th rounder wouldn't be unreasonable for a guy who for all intents and purposes can just flat out play. He doesn't do anything pretty, that's for sure, but the kid goes out and makes things happen to get the job done.

I'm not saying keep him as the 3rd or 4th quarterback here either. I'm saying some of the fat on the team that won't see much if any playing time could make the space on the roster for Thigpen to be an extra WR or RB on the official roster. Someone who's only going to see the field in a backup role maybe 5 times in the season (cough-Zach Thomas-cough) vs Thigpen who could actually play 5 times a half and help win would be an easy decision to me.

If I'm Pioli, I don't trade him for anything less than a 4th rounder. And that 4th rounder better be a damn fine player when I draft them.

Poll
So AP faithful, do you trade Thigpen?
Yes, for whatever compensation we can get (Doritos?)
14 votes
Yes, but only for a 7-5th round pick
5 votes
Yes, but only for a 4th rounder or above (Pioli's area of asking price)
129 votes
Absolutely not. What would I do with my Thigpen jersey?
47 votes

195 votes | Poll has closed

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.

Comment 81 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Thigpen can help us win games....

I just don’t think his chaotic play is the ideal scheme to win championships. Before answering the poll question you have to ask yourself whether you want a few more wins this year or a playoff berth the year after ( and perhaps the year after, and after, etc.)

If Cassel is who we think he might be he needs the experience this year, even if he doesn’t bring us extra wins that Thigpen might be able to conjure up. An improved and experienced Cassel for next year is better than an over-achieving Thigpen this year.

Matriculating – Verb; To trickle in thunderous fashion, to be chaotically methodical in a choreographed motion forward.

by SoCalChief on Aug 26, 2009 10:06 PM CDT reply actions  

Don't think I was saying Thigpen should be QB1

because I wasn’t. He could be the “emergency QB” or whatever it’s called, but be on the roster as a WR, HB, RB, TE, whatever. I just don’t see how you don’t keep this guy around and use him in whatever capacity possible to put you in a position to win games on offense.

And like I said, I’d probably trade him for a 4th or higher just because that ROI is so damn high.

by IISaiNtII on Aug 26, 2009 10:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Less than mediocre...

That’s what comes to mind when I consider Thigpen in a roll other than QB. Also, there has been much discussion about the precious few roster spots we have come opening day.

As a back up ( or emergency QB) you can’t have a guy step on the field who is 180 degrees from what the rest of the team is accustom too. The back up should be running the same offense the starter is, getting himself valuable experience along the way.

Matriculating – Verb; To trickle in thunderous fashion, to be chaotically methodical in a choreographed motion forward.

by SoCalChief on Aug 26, 2009 10:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

At what cost?

Who from the 53 man roster are you going to cut to keep 4 QB’s? Face it cuts are coming, and Thigpen is not going to be a Chiefs QB. Get what we can for him and keep real dept on the roster. I like Thigpen but at this point every player we want to add or just keep means someone gets cut. I do not see how you keep Thigpen and 52 others and expect to win.

is it me? or isn't about time the Lamar Hunt trophy belonged to His team?

I’m a Chiefs fan Dammit and I’m damn proud of it!

by KC Fanatic on Aug 26, 2009 10:24 PM CDT reply actions  

Why keep

someone like Zach Thomas around or someone like Bobby Engram rather than Thigpen? Someone who’s here for depth alone, and not going to contribute in a way that Thigpen could.

Is the 6th or 7th WR really going to have that much more upside than Thigpen? Or the 7th or 8th LB? The designated special teamer not named McGraw?

by IISaiNtII on Aug 26, 2009 10:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

And I'm not saying

DON’T trade him. There’s a right price for every player. I think Pioli has the right price in mind. But I think he could help more than those bottom rung players who won’t see the field much, if at all, during the season.

by IISaiNtII on Aug 26, 2009 10:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

The "right price" is dynamic and subjective...

If in the best case scenario we could get a 5th round and we hold out for a 4th round that never materializes then we have made a poor decision.

Thigpen is fun to watch and a talented player, he’s just wrong for the new-look Chiefs. Get something now or cut him later, that’s what its going to come down to.

Matriculating – Verb; To trickle in thunderous fashion, to be chaotically methodical in a choreographed motion forward.

by SoCalChief on Aug 26, 2009 10:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

word is

Jax is offering a 5th, Pioli wants a 3rd…..we may be able to meet in the middle at 4 but its doubtful.

by the way what did we trade for the 2 OL from Miami?

by KCCheeze on Aug 26, 2009 10:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not heard yet

I’m guessing it’s conditional on playing time though.

by IISaiNtII on Aug 26, 2009 10:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

The consensus

between fans bloggers and sports writers is that it’s a fifth. But nothings official yet

Time is a great teacher... unfortunately it kills all it's pupils.

by 808NaNz808 on Aug 27, 2009 3:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

and that's where I disagree

I am not saying he should stay on as a QB. Fact is, it doesn’t matter what he’s listed as on the roster to me. He can make things happen, and that’s the kind of jack of all trades person I think this team needs on the field as much as they can get them out there. Pioli loves versatile players, I hear. Well, theres one on the team.

Nothing he does is pretty, mechanically sound, but he gets the job done when it counts.

by IISaiNtII on Aug 26, 2009 10:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

"Jack of all trades" =

Master of none.

Let the Romans live in Rome.

Matriculating – Verb; To trickle in thunderous fashion, to be chaotically methodical in a choreographed motion forward.

by SoCalChief on Aug 26, 2009 10:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

difference is

a 6 or 7 WR or 7-8 LB has more of a chance to be on the field than a 4th QB…whether it is on offense or special teams

by KCCheeze on Aug 26, 2009 10:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

This is a good question (and post!)

I was thinking that the Chiefs are probably telling these teams that we are going to keep 4 QBs, so if you want Thigpen you have to pony up. What other leverage would they have?

But it is fascinating that we would so quickly be willing to part with a guy who kept it interesting last year. I am not as big a Thigpen fan as others though. I respect what he did, and he shows potential. But in my limited view, I just don’t see him having the kind of accuracy to really excel and take us to a SB someday. He would seem to be more valuable currently as a backup and/or a Wildcat QB. With the solid play of Guitz, he is expendable.

by TheQ on Aug 26, 2009 10:32 PM CDT reply actions  

I was leaning more towards

keeping him in the wildcat role, not on the roster as a QB. Put him in as a WR/RB on goal line situations, direct snap him the ball with Cassel in the shotgun, you have two guys who can throw the ball, hand it off, or run it in. Confusing a defense is the way to score points in the NFL, and unless you’re the 2007 Patriots, teams don’t generally score a whole lot of points.

by IISaiNtII on Aug 26, 2009 10:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

He is an exciting runner

But it doesn’t seem like Haley is all that interested in finding way to use him like that. It would seem that by him coming into the game 2nd this Saturday, they are showcasing him for whoever. Would Pioli make a mistake by letting him go? We just don’t know yet.

by TheQ on Aug 26, 2009 10:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

See, that's what makes me sad

Yeah, he’s not the best looking guy out there. But he can do it. Haley is coming off to me very much like Edwards did. “we’re gonna do things this way dammit. Larry, run into their asses!”

It didn’t work last year, and I’m wiling to bet it won’t work that well this year either. If their choice is trade him or cut him, definitely trade him.

by IISaiNtII on Aug 26, 2009 10:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

No kidding

Surely they feel he is too valuable to cut. If they have talked to multiple teams about him, at the very least I can see them keeping 4 QBs on the roster until some other team needs one due to injury, and the asking price would be right.

by TheQ on Aug 26, 2009 10:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think you're exactly right, Q.

Similar thoughts have been expressed on the “competing” Thigpen thread. It took a few highlight reels linked to from that other thread that jarred me into the realization that Pioli can carry out the threat of just holding onto Thigpen if the deal ain’t right. Price today is a 4th-rounder. Price in midseason for a team that lost a couple linemen (and a couple QBs as a result) could easily be a 3rd-rounder, or a conditional pick that could go even higher, if Thiggie played lights out and carried a struggling team to an impressive finish. That scenario would be great, only I’d have to admit to feeling sorry for him when his new team lost in the conference championship to the Chiefs.

No question. Otis Taylor should be in the Hall of Fame.

by hmills110 on Aug 28, 2009 12:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Damn right Haley is being stubborn

just like he was when Waters wanted a sit down. Haley could of respected the fact that he was a pro bowler, veteran, and proven leader. But Haley has been “stubborn” with his stance that everybody had to earn their way on the team. If Haley says we’re not going to run a gimmick offense then I’m fine with that. If the current players can’t win games with a traditional pro offense then I imagine Pioli will just continue to bring in new players until we find some that can win. I understand that we could use him in special creative ways to make a few plays, but if we come to rely on those to move the ball then we are no longer making progress towards our goal of developing a dependable offense capable of being a big time super bowl contender. If our offense was already there I’d be on board. But right now, our offense needs to focus on finding players who can help us pound the football and make consistant completions in the passing game not drawing up goofy wildcat formation, 2 QB, trick play stuff. The Bradley to Thigpen TD may of been the highlight of the season last year, it was exciting, but it didn’t make us a better club. Haley is trying to build this the right way “his way”. It probably won’t happen this year but I believe that because he is “stubborn” it will happen and we will get back to being one of the elite teams in the AFC.

Ten sacks in a season! For crying out loud that's what I used to average per game using DT in Tecmo Bowl!

by KCporkchop on Aug 26, 2009 10:37 PM CDT reply actions  

Why does it have to wait

for him to get his type of players? Why can’t he change his dynamic to what he has now and make changes as players come in? Wouldn’t that be a more sound philosophy?

by IISaiNtII on Aug 26, 2009 10:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Like I said

every play in a game or time in practice that they committ to what I’ll kindly refer to as “creative playcalling” is less time spent working on getting the running game fixed and the timing of the passing game down. How many times has he said they are going with the players that will do it his way. The “creative plays” apparently aren’t “his way”. We can debate wether that’s a good call on his part, but to say that makes him “Herm-like” is way off. Herm never held the players accountable to doing it how he wanted. Haley doesn’t give a crap who you are or what you’ve done last season if you won’t do it how he wants you’re gone and Pioli will get him a guy that will.

Ten sacks in a season! For crying out loud that's what I used to average per game using DT in Tecmo Bowl!

by KCporkchop on Aug 26, 2009 10:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why do you think Creative play calling isn't his thing

do you think he would show it in the preseason to show other teams what to expect during the season? No he is not going too give other teams anything.
He has been running a very basic offense this preseason, one reason is the team is not ready for anything more right now and another reason is teams will only have the preseason films to watch to game plan for us, so if he shows very little they will not know what to expect.

As Cassel said in a interview the other day he doesn’t even know what kind of offense they will be. We all can say Haley will do this but the truth is we have no idea, and we won’t till they start playing real games.

Herm is gone things are better with that one move!!

by bringbacktheglory on Aug 26, 2009 11:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

But right now, our offense needs to focus on finding players who can help us pound the football and make consistant completions in the passing game not drawing up goofy wildcat formation, 2 QB, trick play stuff. The Bradley to Thigpen TD may of been the highlight of the season last year, it was exciting, but it didn’t make us a better club.

I agree, good teams don’t have to use gimmick plays to win although great teams can use them to gain an edge.

We should be basing our whole offense around these plays as they aren’t consistent enough to win games. They will get a decent offense a TD when they really need it (cough) Steelers (cough), but you can’t bank on them working all the time. This isn’t college football. All the crazy plays in the world won’t help you win a title. It’s executing the 2 yard draw play on 3rd and 2 every time that gets you there.

by Fyzzle on Aug 27, 2009 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

shouldn’t…. gah

Is it Saturday yet?

by Fyzzle on Aug 27, 2009 12:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

+1

But I can see Thigpen’s value being higher if the o-line is struggling in short yardage and goal line. I’ve seen enough of Cassel and Croyle to believe that KC could still move the ball between the 20s very effectively, even if they had to go ArrowSpread to do it. In that scenario, I could see Thigpen coming onto the field in the red zone.

No question. Otis Taylor should be in the Hall of Fame.

by hmills110 on Aug 28, 2009 12:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Tyler Thipen couldnt play RB or WR. He isnt strong enough to deal with press coverage. He cant break tackles. That being said I still say keep him unless somene offers a 4th. Dont forget Matt Cassell ran almost the same offense last year in NE. You should really have a mind of your own instead of listening to the media. Thigpen haters say he cant run a pro style offense so the Chiefs had to change their offense. The pats did the same thing with cassell. In fact only cassell took more snaps from the shotgun then thiggy. Why keep guiterez over thigpen. yeah Guiterez had a good preseason game, cost us that game though t the end. Thigpen had a probowl caliber season. Brett Farve threw 22 tds, Thigpen threw 4 less in 4 games. His play works. We went from putting up 3 points a game to 24-30 all year. I bet if he went to Carolina, they would be dynamic. Thiggy Running behind that line checking it down to Stewart, Throwing to Smith. I hope he goes to Carolina. Im surprised that Miami doesnt want him but I guess they have white.

by dougritchey on Aug 26, 2009 11:04 PM CDT reply actions  

Hold on a sec.....

…OK were good, I checked his blog memberships, he’s not a Panthers fan moonlighting on the AP.

Matriculating – Verb; To trickle in thunderous fashion, to be chaotically methodical in a choreographed motion forward.

by SoCalChief on Aug 26, 2009 11:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

I know all about the offense Cassel ran

I did a post on that right after the Chiefs traded for his rights. I think Thigpen is durable enough to play several times in a game and take a few hits. He took some last year without much cause for concern.

by IISaiNtII on Aug 26, 2009 11:09 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

He did exceed everyone's expectations, no doubt

but to say he had a Pro Bowl caliber season is a stretch. Sometimes I think we tend to overate some of our players, well, because they play for the Chiefs.

by TheQ on Aug 26, 2009 11:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed we are all guilty of being homers at one time or another.

Pro bowl is a stretch but if they had one for rookies I would put him in, A guy who was a 3rd stringer with very few reps starts in 10 games and throws for more TD’s than i think it was 17 other starting QB’s in the league. his main downfall is his accuracy but he does know how to find the end zone.

Herm is gone things are better with that one move!!

by bringbacktheglory on Aug 27, 2009 12:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

True

He does have a certain knack for moving the ball. In the first preseason game, even though he was playing against scrubs, he took them right down the field to score. My biggest problem with him last year, besides the accuracy issue, which is a big one, was that he couldn’t get it done in the 4th quarter. Maybe some of that blame should be shared by his teamates, coaches, etc, but for all his moxie I would have thought he wouldn’t dissapear like that. I have to keep reminding myself that he is still learning.

by TheQ on Aug 27, 2009 12:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Whether you love or hate Thigpen...

Now is the time to make this move. He clearly is not the QB of the future here and wont be. So if we’re going to have him sitting on the bench anyway(because I guaratee Cassel gets at least two years worth of leash) then we might as well trade him when his value is at its peak. No use sitting on him and having his value go down.

"Success is never ending, failure is never final."

by GenericBrand on Aug 26, 2009 11:08 PM CDT reply actions  

We could all be one day talking about what a great football player is, but,

that will not be as a Chief. He’s a playmaker but not in a Haley style offense. He wants to burn defenses when they blitz not spread them out and run.

by fishhooks on Aug 26, 2009 11:40 PM CDT reply actions  

+1

Maybe nobody right NOW who wants to spend a 3rd-rounder, but I think there’s a better than 50-50 chance that there’ll be a team that gets painted into that corner by a shitty O-Line, and Thigpen has shown he can keep things interesting and put up 20+ points per game in very exciting fashion.

No question. Otis Taylor should be in the Hall of Fame.

by hmills110 on Aug 28, 2009 12:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

no way trade Thigpen

newbie here
I was in the minority that voted “no way”.
Thigpen reminds me a lot of Gannon and Rich proved what a mistake we made in keeping Bono. A good scraper like Thigpen could turn out to be a great QB if he is given the right supporting cast. No one QB on our roster has proved himself in Red yet other then Thigpen last year. If Castle doesn’t work out for whatever reason as our Franchise QB, Thigpen would be our next bext option.

by pioli fan, not sure haley on Aug 27, 2009 12:02 AM CDT reply actions  

You want to build aroud Thigpen;
A good scraper like Thigpen could turn out to be a great QB if he is given the right supporting cast.

or is he a backup;

If Castle doesn’t work out for whatever reason as our Franchise QB, Thigpen would be our next bext option.

Both quarterbacks require a different scheme and therefore somewhat different supporting cast, I just don’t think you can have it both ways. Remember what Mr. Miyagi said about the middle of the road;

Matriculating – Verb; To trickle in thunderous fashion, to be chaotically methodical in a choreographed motion forward.

by SoCalChief on Aug 27, 2009 12:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

BTW.....Welcome to the AP P.F.N.S.H.Y. !

Matriculating – Verb; To trickle in thunderous fashion, to be chaotically methodical in a choreographed motion forward.

by SoCalChief on Aug 27, 2009 12:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

Both QB's ran the spread last year.

Herm is gone things are better with that one move!!

by bringbacktheglory on Aug 27, 2009 12:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

You mean the "Spread"

Matriculating – Verb; To trickle in thunderous fashion, to be chaotically methodical in a choreographed motion forward.

by SoCalChief on Aug 27, 2009 12:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

or the "oh shit" scamble for you're life spread!

Matriculating – Verb; To trickle in thunderous fashion, to be chaotically methodical in a choreographed motion forward.

by SoCalChief on Aug 27, 2009 12:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

ours just looked like that because of our line.

And I was just saying NE ran the spread and Haley ran the spread in AZ. So don’t be surprised to see it this year.

Herm is gone things are better with that one move!!

by bringbacktheglory on Aug 27, 2009 8:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

More than 50% spread versus Vikes, I seem to recall.

I dunno, Pioli Fan. Gannon could uncork it, and Thigpen hasn’t shown as much of that.

If it were I when Gannon was losing close games in relief of (Bono/Grbac – take your pick), I’d’ve DEFINITELY have switched to Gannon, and either fired Hackett or told Marty to leave him the hell alone.

Thigpen could beCOME Gannon, or even more, but he ain’t there, just yet.

That being said, I felt the same way you did, Pioli Fan before I saw Cassel and Thigpen in the preseason, when Cassel built on the lead he established in the first OTA (and I was unhappy that QB came before OL).

No question. Otis Taylor should be in the Hall of Fame.

by hmills110 on Aug 28, 2009 12:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

… meaning that I was still relatively unhappy with spending the money and the pick on QB, and wanted to just improve the team around Thigpen, starting with OL.

My thinking THEN was he’s shown he can survive being thrown to the wolves, so let’s throw him to the wolves AGAIN, and bring in a QB later on, after there’s some confidence the new guy will live to see the sun rise on Monday morning.. In general, I think it’s stupid to spend big on QB before you can protect him.

But Cassel’s TOUGH and MOBILE, so I started rationalizing a Cassel-Thigpen duo, since I’d figure they oughta go 2 deep in athletic QBs with this highly physical style of QB play. NOW, seeing Cassel’s clearly superior development, getting the QB first is high risk, but may be the best shot at high return SHORT term (i.e. 2009 season).

Blah blah blah. Let’s just hope that the gamble pays off better than going for 2 against San Diego, down 20-19.

No question. Otis Taylor should be in the Hall of Fame.

by hmills110 on Aug 28, 2009 12:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think we are on the same page

You have responded to a few of my comments saying that Cassel is better than Thigpen, and I agree, I have never said he was. Cassel went to a collage with good coaches, then went to a top team with good coaches and has had 4 years to learn from one of the best Qb’s in the league. Thigpen didn’t have any of those things,

I also agree that Thigpen is not better than the Gannon when he played for us, but Gannon had been in the league a while before he came here, What i did say if you look at Gannon when he first started Thigpen put up better numbers.

My main points have been Thigpen is better than Croyle Thigpen has played in only two more games than Croyle and has out scored him almost 4-1. Croyle has had two full off seasons with Herm trying to make him a starter and even when he was healthy hasn’t show he can play in the NFL in real games. Does look good in the off season though.

Sorry this was so long, but I do seem to think we agree on a lot of things i always like reading your comments.

Herm is gone things are better with that one move!!

by bringbacktheglory on Aug 28, 2009 8:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thx, bbtg

As I’ve said repeatedly, I fully expect Croyle to beat out Thigpen in training camp. I thought it likely Croyle could look better than CASSEL in limited contact drills. But I didn’t think he’d last long in regulation. It’s pretty hard to fault Haley for going by what he sees in camp. I still think, though, that if Croyle is tested under fire, the #3 QB will be on the field before long.

As for the comparison of the records, though, I’ve seen a lot of Heisman winners who were very good players crash and burn because they’d go high in the draft to the worst teams and lose their confidence, health, or both. This might be happening with Croyle (not that he won a Heisman or anything), and I’m open to the idea that the guy who can salvage SOMETHING out of a shitty situation isn’t necessarily the guy who can be consistent if the situation improves, and suddenly you’re a fundamentally sound team with an inconsistent QB.

And when I look at the mechanics of the two QBs and the accuracy, in a good situation, Croyle’s probably going to be more accurate. Not having enough info to make such a close call, I’m in wait-and-see mode.

And I’m HOPING that nobody (JAX) bites on Pioli’s offer and KC lets somebody other than Thigpen go, because Thigpen has the potential to be a great one.

Much respect.

No question. Otis Taylor should be in the Hall of Fame.

by hmills110 on Aug 28, 2009 3:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think Al Davis wants him....

Thiggy hasn’t been in enough trouble yet so he won’t fit the Raider image…Lol!

Dauntless!!

Matriculating – Verb; To trickle in thunderous fashion, to be chaotically methodical in a choreographed motion forward.

by SoCalChief on Aug 27, 2009 12:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thigpen to Oakland = Gannon to Oakland

Time is a great teacher... unfortunately it kills all it's pupils.

by 808NaNz808 on Aug 27, 2009 3:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

What's wrong with different?

I agree with those saying keep Thiggy! I have a few reasons so I’ll list them off. And no I don’t think he should be starting unless he is truly beating out the competition.

1. Intangibles – every team in every sport looks for these, whether it be certain plays, players or even the weather. Well for the Chiefs they have Tyler Thigpen. The man can pass, run and catch and take a hit. Could probably even drop kick a field goal if needed (Flutie). The wildcat or any other trick formations are not the future of the NFL, but last I checked points are points and that’s how you win the game. No one ever said you have to score in a traditional formation.

2. Knowledge – he knows the team, the players and the system. Aside from losing Tony G and gaining a couple of older WR, it’s the same offense with the same OC who according to Haley will be calling the plays. Yes he has a run mentality, but so did Vick, Culpepper, McNabb. And I think the reason he has that mentality is because he has no faith in his O line and rightfully so.

3. Stats – we all know his stats. Aside from the win-lose record its pretty comparable to Cassel’s. Matt had a powerful O in N.E. and supposedly a great line yet he was sacked
the most in the NFL. How is he going to do here. Brodie has shown he can’t take a hit so he wouldn’t last. That leaves Thiggy who has proven he can play well and put up points behind a half ass line.

I know this is a lot of rambling but I’m sure it will get some arguments and that’s what I like.

by Chiefsfan_in_the_MileHigh on Aug 27, 2009 1:54 AM CDT reply actions  

....

They won’t trade him unless it is a very good deal. Just because “Gut” had a solid preseason game doesn’t mean anything. So if they don’t get a good deal for Thigpen then gut will be cut. Croyle will be injured so that leaves us with Cassel and Thigpen. The two best options in the first place.

by Chiefsfan85 on Aug 27, 2009 1:56 AM CDT reply actions  

Correction

I should have stated that " I don’t think he should start" not “should be starting.” I’m not from the hood and was taught proper grammar and I apologize.

by Chiefsfan_in_the_MileHigh on Aug 27, 2009 2:10 AM CDT reply actions  

So you don't want people to think you're from the hood

Bad form.

Lots of pretty intelligent people come from the hood.

"The first step to penetration... must not be lateral"
-Confucius, in contrary to Glenn Dorsey lining up in the 2-tech

by ArrowSpread on Aug 27, 2009 5:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

He’s just trying to fit in with us hoighty-toighty’s (as I check my hair in the storefront reflection).

I know you mean well, and want to do well, Chiefsfan_in_the_MileHigh.

Is it me, or are there a lot of Colorado Chiefs fans? I’m a KC native, currently residing in CO, myself.

No question. Otis Taylor should be in the Hall of Fame.

by hmills110 on Aug 28, 2009 12:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Who would have thought at the beginning of the off season

that during pre season Thiggy would be on the trade/ cutting block?

That being said. Haley doesn’t run gimmicks, never has never will. What he will run is smart plays with smart players. This requires a QB with vision and accuracy, a set of wide recievers that can spread the field, a HB that can take advantage of a confused defense, and an O line to hold it together. Thigpen doesn’t fit in. If we can get a pick and adress one of the aforementioned that are currently lacking (WR and OL) were doing the sensible thing

The Wildcat was a gimmick and I don’t expect to see much of it this year. Towards the end of last year teams were picking it apart and it slowly exited the NFL. The Wildcat can win you games early in the season but if your taking that non sense to playoffs don’t expect results because playoff caliber defenses (especially in the AFC) will take that formation on with solid play from the front 7.

I’d agree with a fourth for Thiggy, that would compensate for the Ndukwe and Allenman trade. I’d even take a fifth. But if we can get a third for a player we claimed off of waivers a year ago and who would have otherwise been either 3rd string or cut this year, that’s awesome value.

That said, Rosenfels, acquired as a backup whoi is much older than Thigpen, was traded to Minnesota for a fourth. Just something to consider

Time is a great teacher... unfortunately it kills all it's pupils.

by 808NaNz808 on Aug 27, 2009 3:16 AM CDT reply actions  

the wildcat is just another form of the gimmick plays

that have been around for as long as I can remember,
And also there were at least three more teams that were practicing the wild cant this off season.

Herm is gone things are better with that one move!!

by bringbacktheglory on Aug 27, 2009 7:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

The wildcant

has been practiced by every team every year. The Chargers did it with Tomlinson tossing TD passes. The Patriots did it with Vrabel catching TD passes in goal line situations. The flea flicker, hook and ladder, and the like are all gimmick plays. The point of a gimmick play is to catch a defense off gaurd and capitalize on their confusion. IF this offense is anything like the past, we may need some tricks to keep defenses honest.

by IISaiNtII on Aug 27, 2009 7:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with you (wild cant) should have been wildcat.

I should have had my coffee before trying to make a point. The post above mine said he didn’t think the wildcat would be seen much this year. I was trying to say that the wildcat is just a new name for something that has been around as long as I can remember.
 
Marty loved the trick plays, maybe you remember the defense guy we had that would come on offense and caught like 10 TD’ one year? I can’t remember his name for the life of me.

Herm is gone things are better with that one move!!

by bringbacktheglory on Aug 27, 2009 8:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sorry,

I misunderstood you.

There’s always gonna be hail mary type stuff (Bradley pass to Thigpen for a TD, who saw that one coming?) but having the option of having three guys on the field that can throw (Bradley, Thigpen, and the starting QB Cassel), many who can catch and many who can run just gives a guy more choices and makes defenses stay honest. Thigpen can scramble, lateral to Cassel to buy him time to throw and the receivers to get down the field and get open, or throw himself.

I don’t really see it as a gimmick play(s), but rather playing the guys you have intelligently.

by IISaiNtII on Aug 27, 2009 9:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agree that Thigpen should stay unless a 3rd rounder should be offered

The Chiefs need more ‘get ur done’ type players and Thigpen is one.
PR, slot WR, double QB backfields, holder on kicks, declared TE on red zone plays.
Thigpen uses his Brain and Body to get points and is durable to date.
Maybe he doesn’t fit the Pro-set O, but he does fit the Pioli/Haley desirables as a player.
Thus, someone is going to have to WOW them to pry him of the Chiefs roster.
I hope that Chan Gailey is really backing Thipen as a part of this years Offense :)

Let's Kick some ASS in 09 or Die trying

by Steve_Chiefs on Aug 27, 2009 7:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nicely said Steve

Herm is gone things are better with that one move!!

by bringbacktheglory on Aug 27, 2009 10:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wild-Cant?

Is that a Freudian slip?

Dauntlessly Matriculating

by SoCalChief on Aug 27, 2009 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well put, Nanz.

The worse the O-Line, though, the more I’d want Thiggy around, and the O-Line is still unproven. So he has enough value to the Chiefs as a potential contributor to hold out for a better-than-5th-round draft pick, imho, even though the best outcome for KC is a 4th-rounder, now, or a 4th-or-better during the season, to some team that’s in a bind (and there’s always at least one, it seems).

No question. Otis Taylor should be in the Hall of Fame.

by hmills110 on Aug 28, 2009 12:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

Man what's wrong with you negative people??

Comeon now!! You know who you are. Bill Parcells was stubborn. Jimmy Johnson was stubborn. Belichek is so stubborn, even mules get annoyed by him.
Would you complainers prefer to have the relaxed, non-stubborn Herm Edwards regime back?
How can you say we don’t have a “Pro style capable offense”?? We HAVEN"T seen any true offense yet. It’s preseason. It’s a glamorized practice session.
Who shows their hand in preseason??? Nobody!

We have no idea what our offense or defense can do yet, and we won’t until season kicks off. Either way, there’s no need to be all crazy discouraged towards Haley and Pioli. I bet you’d all sing a different tune if they said " Oh ok the fans don’t want us here. we quit..we’ll go to a city that appreciates us". Then we hired Carl and Herm back.

Comeon guys and gals. Try to look on the bright side. People said the same thing when Tony G got traded. But he would have been traded if he was 25 and in his prime. Unless we had money to burn and were super deep in all positions and could afford to keep a luxury tight end like Tony he would have been traded at any point in his career under Pioli and Haley. Why? Because Haley’s offensive schemes don’t utilize tight ends very much. So to have a high paid superstar TE wouldn’t make much sense. It would make more sense to use his trade value to get the receiving corp and O-Line we need. Same here with Thiggy.

Your points on Thiggy are true enough from your viewpoint. But does Thiggy fit in with the offensive schemes Haley intends to use here?? That’s the biggest question.
Who cares if he could be a wildcat option or a scrambler on his feet if that’s not how Haley’s going to run his offense.

A 500 hp Evinrude is a powerhouse and a fast piece of equipment..but it’s not practical if your going canoeing. So it doesn’t matter at all what Thig’s strong points are if they don’t fit in with our offensive scheme. Haley just may not want that type of QB here. Period. It’s not an insult to Thig or a stupid move on our part by any means. Jared Allen is case in point.

He is head and shoulders above any player we have currently, when it comes to sacking the QB…but ONLY in a 4-3 scheme. You could argue about his stats and his ability all day long and you’de be correct, but only within the scheme that utilizes his particular skill set. He wouldn’t be a good fit for a speedy 3-4 hybrid.
So we need to keep things in perspective. We don’t know the big picture. We need to have a little faith and be supportive of our new leadership. Let’s not damn them before they even get a chance to play one season game…please!!

by krayfish on Aug 27, 2009 7:29 AM CDT reply actions  

It's not negativity

it’s the ability to see a pattern ermerging. I’m not condemning Haley because I think he’s head and shoulders above H.E. in the coaching ability. I NEVER liked Herm’s hiring. The standard, vanilla crap you see in preseason is a glimpse into what you can expect the starters to look like the first few games until either things come together, or they fall apart. I’m not making any judgements on what’s going to happen, only remembering back 3 years ago when the same things were said by another head coach… “We’re gonna hit em in the mouth. We’re going to be a smart football team. We’re gonna play smash-mouth football.”

How’d that work out again? There’s obvious differences between the preparation and the turnover in players with Haley and Pioli, which is a good thing to me. They’re willing to make corrections where it’s needed.

The focus of this post was to think about how Thigpen can help the team, not about the coaching staff.

by IISaiNtII on Aug 27, 2009 7:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Wow give us some good info on the Chiefs then since you and Haley are so close

because the rest of us have no idea what offense we are going to run, even Cassel said it in an interview the other day he didn’t know. like you said he isn’t going to show his hand in preseason, so we won’t know until the start of the season.

As far as the TG statement it’s the same as people saying we would be a running team because he didn’t do it in AZ, well that has been proved wrong( now we just need the O-line to help with that). So the same goes with TG, not very many teams have a TE like TG so of course they wouldn’t use a TE very much.

Herm is gone things are better with that one move!!

by bringbacktheglory on Aug 27, 2009 8:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Great comments, krayfish.

You’re the only person other than myself who’s made the “luxury TE” comment regarding Tony’s early years. The thing was King Carl just HAD to squeeze. HAD to put the Franchise tag on him and DEMAND EVERYTHING to which he was entitled, rather than take a 2nd-round pick and get some cap relief for REAL positions of need. Hell, teach a LB off the street to block, if you have to, but don’t have all that coin in a TE, when the team is bleeding to death elsewhere on the roster.

Very nice turn of phrase, there, too.

Agree on the Jared Allen 4-3 thing.

In fact, you’re talking like I do, (except you have style and wit)

I’d disagree slightly with the “Thigpen isn’t a good fit.” The only reason he’s not a good fit is his apparent stage of development. He’s a project player who can make some things happen when all other bets are off, while he’s still developing. I think that right now, the Chiefs would PREFER to have the draft pick, and asking a 4th right now is about right, and contemplating the likelihood of a 3rd later on.

I don’t think APers are overly critical at this stage, although I did see an “unacceptable” float by (and remarked on it). But even the most critical of those comments were leavened with expressions of relief and relative satisfaction with the new outfit. But part of the fun of being here is talking out loud about things that don’t make sense to you, and why. A goodly percentage of the time, these obviously unsupportable critiques crop up in FACT, later on, so when Nanz or ||Saint|| lay it down, I definitely pay attention.

AP is more about telling it like it is, even when you don’t like what the team is doing. So don’t be too tough on the criticizers.

No question. Otis Taylor should be in the Hall of Fame.

by hmills110 on Aug 28, 2009 1:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

JA

Jared was traded before the move to 3-4? Also… he’d be my predator in this scheme! (hali is looking pretty good tho methinks)

by DuctTapeMessiah on Aug 27, 2009 7:51 AM CDT reply actions  

RE

doh meant to RE: krayfish, sorry :><

by DuctTapeMessiah on Aug 27, 2009 7:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thiggy

Like his Moxi. Hate his competion % and mechanics. He is a luxury we can’t afford.
We don’t have the depth to keep 4 QB’s

David Logue

by dklogue1 on Aug 27, 2009 12:20 PM CDT reply actions  

So you would rather have a back-up

that has been injured since high school and looks good moving down the field but can’t score a TD?
Thigpen has out scored Croyle almost 4 to 1 in TD’s with only 3 more starts.

Herm is gone things are better with that one move!!

by bringbacktheglory on Aug 27, 2009 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Then don't keep him as a QB.

Why is no one getting this? It’s not just you dk, it’s most of the people who have commented.

He doesn’t have to be listed as a QB, in fact, I’d prefer him NOT to be because of certain NFL rules about the QB rotation. Barring a 3rd or 4th round pick for him, I’d rather keep him and USE him than trade him away.

I saw where Herms pride got us last season with the “we’re going to be a running team” philosophy. Not that much has changed in personnel (until the roster cuts come, who knows for sure though) since then, yet. As far as I’m concerned, it would be stupid to NOT use Thigpen’s evasiveness several times per game, and throw him out as a decoy on a few other plays.

by IISaiNtII on Aug 27, 2009 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

we understand

what you are saying. problem is no matter what position we list him as…he takes up a rostrer spot…

we cannot afford to have 4 on the roster even if you call him a WR…we need those epots for players who are going to be on the field and take more snaps

by KCCheeze on Aug 27, 2009 6:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Watching the Jax Phili game

it looks like the jags may be willing to offer up a better offer after looking at the shots their QB’s are taking

by KCCheeze on Aug 27, 2009 6:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Problem is

I don’t see many of these backup guys playing… especially when Haley is talking about using starting defenders on special teams. Next season, definitely a different story.

All I can say is I hope my concerns and doubts are wrong.

by IISaiNtII on Aug 28, 2009 7:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog! Follow us on Facebook and on Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Some clarity on Peyton's injury
Crennelgatoradebathposterizedrough_small
Brian Daboll: Another Perspective
Dxmcc_copy_small
Why Drafting Robert Griffin Is Not Optional For The Kansas City Chiefs
Stag_20silhouette_small
Weekly Official AP Mock-tastic Thread 1/31-2/6 Post-Senior-Bowl-edition

Recent FanPosts

Small
Whats Your Opinion ?
Small
Former Players
Okoye_small
Setting the Trenches: Offensive Line
Small
The Three Most WTF Moments of the Chiefs Season
Chiefs_logo_small
Need some help, KC trip
9aaaa629560faa267f0a91faca7f420d-getty-135962716_small
Ben Grubbs.
Small
2012 Free Agency & Draft Predictions
Tobias_small
Options At Quarterback for 2012
Small
Nation Wide Mock Draft
Images_small
Flowers vs Carr: 1 vs 2??

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

23247_617116905_1805_n_small Chris Thorman

Headshot_small Joel Thorman

Editors

288-chiefstexans0944_sp_8-15-09_jfs woodman212

Matt_ssv_pic_small_small Matt Conner

Stag_20silhouette_small stagdsp

Lips-rhps_small upamtn

Contributors

Kc_ny_small NJ Chiefs Fan

Phoenix_by_melen_small KaloPhoenix

N1358340181_30185582_5800_small Flowers24

Small Jon Yoon

Dirkness_small HisDirkness

Cassel_small Steve_in_RI