Previewing the Kansas City Chiefs 2009 Schedule: Week 7
via NBC Sports Media
I caught up with John over at Bolts from the Blue and asked him a few questions about the Kansas City Chiefs week seven matchup with the San Diego Chargers.
We talked about LaDainian Tomlinson, stopping Philip Rivers and Shawne Merriman. John also talked a little bit about the Chargers originally switching to the 3-4. In short, there's not a good chance things will work to perfection in year one unless you have several key parts in place.
Many thanks to John. Complete question and answers are after the jump.
Is LaDainian Tomlinson on the decline? If so, will the Chargers beef up Darren Sproles' role in the offense?
My response to this question cannot be taken as the response of our fanbase. These are issues that we're very torn on. I'll answer them separately, because they're equally important issues.
LT - Technically, LT began his downfall last year. He posted career lows in carries and yards, as well as the lowest number of rushing TDs and the lowest yards per carry since his rookie season. However, I'm of the belief that this has more to do with him having tired legs than anything else.
Although he started his career by juking people out of their shoes, he's has developed into a very smart runner who I think can be successful again if he can have some of the load taken away from him and remains healthy.
Sproles - Major point of contention between Chargers fans. I'm of the belief that Sproles numbers where stay exactly where they are. Around 60 carries and more than 30 receptions for the season keeps him fresh during punt and kick returns. Increasing his load, as everyone saw with Devin Hester last season (and Dante Hall in the past), will make the Chargers return game less dynamic.
I think Darren Sproles showed in his only start, against Pittsburgh in the playoffs last season, that he's not fit to be a starter in the league.
My belief, or perhaps I should say my hope, is that 50-100 of LT's carries are given to the Chargers rookie RB Gartrell Johnson. He's a power running back cut from the same cloth as Stephen Jackson. If they use him effectively (allowing LT to take a series off every so often, pounding the ball in the 4th quarter, short yardage situations), he'll make the running game better and the "three headed monster" will be healthy going into the postseason.
If you're the Chiefs defense, what do you stop first?
The passing game. You have to get a pass-rush on Rivers. If you can't do that, you can't beat the Chargers in 2009. There's nothing else you can focus on.
Philip can manage fine without a running game, and he spreads the ball out enough that you can't focus on one receiver with your secondary. He's patient and he's smart. You won't force him to make a mistake unless you he's throwing with Chiefs hanging off of him. If I'm a defensive coordinator, I'm playing basic Cover 2 over the top and bringing heat with the linebackers.
If you can get him to the ground, he has issues with fumbling the ball.
What do you expect out of Shawne Merriman this year? Is he the focal point of the defense?
Merriman makes the defense go. However, I have no idea how to answer your question. If his knee is 100%, I expect at least 14 sacks from him.
Ron Rivera, in his first offseason as the defensive coordinator of a 3-4 defense, seems to be brewing up some insanity that will make the second question impossible for me to answer. The initial word out is that instead of your basic 3-4 setup, Ron is planning on running out a defense that plays with three pass rushing linebackers (Merriman, Phillips, English) and one inside linebacker (except on obvious passing downs).
Also, nobody has any idea who is playing defensive end in place of the departed Igor Olshansky, if anybody.
If I was a defensive coordinator right now, I'd start with slowing down defensive tackle Jamal Williams and then I'd focus on Merriman. If you can't stop Jamal from blowing through the middle of the line, you don't stand a chance.
The Chiefs are switching to the 3-4 defense this season. What was it like when the Chargers originally switched to the 3-4?
Crazy. I wrote an article about first-year 3-4 defenses here. Most teams actually get worse in their first seasons in the system.
The Chargers were lucky enough, that season, to find an outside linebacker that was a good pass rusher (but never knew it) in Steve Foley. He went from a mediocre outside linebacker with the Bengals to a 10-sack star with the Chargers, and the team went from 4-12 to 12-4.
It's different now, just five years later, because the Chiefs have players that have played in and against a lot of 3-4 defenses. I think the Chargers were the second or third team to run it full-time, so the first season was filled with missed assignments and silly mistakes.
It takes a few years before you have the right guy in every slot, but the most important spots are ones that the Chargers had filled that year. Donnie Edwards was the smart "coverage" middle linebacker, Steve Foley was the pass rushing outside linebacker, and Jamal Williams was the dominant nose tackle that took up two (or three) blockers.
If you have those pieces, you'll be alright in the first year.
***
Many thanks to John over at Bolts from the Blue for answering these questions. My prediction for this game: Chargers 24 Chiefs 14
0 recs |
16 comments
|
Comments
By this game,
If the combos of LJ/Charles and LT/Sproles are hitting on all cylinders, I think this has the potential to be one of the best games of the year. A really good, knock down-drag out fight. Should be interesting!
Inifinite Diversity In Infinite Combinations
by carthagechief on Jul 29, 2009 12:12 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
"You have to get a pass-rush on Rivers. If you can't do that, you can't beat the Chargers in 2009."
Thats strange. I couldve sworn we had no pass rush last year and really shouldve won both games against the Chargers.
"Success is never ending, failure is never final."
by GenericBrand on Jul 29, 2009 12:26 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Actually...
Funny enough, the Chargers only gave up 25 sacks last year and the Chiefs only got 10. But the Chiefs sacked Rivers 5 times. So yeah, I’d say that’s true.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Jul 30, 2009 1:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
True story...
It was all Bowe IMO
Virtus En Arduo
by carthagechief on Jul 29, 2009 12:31 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'll take this interview with a grain of salt
Great that he contributed and he was very fair and gracious, but I’m a San Diego local and I can tell you that this team is not as good as he illustrates. LT is going to be solid, but he’s touched on some other things that are going to make life challenging for Chargers fans. Igor being gone is going to hurt far worse on defense than anyone here (San Diego) realizes. I also strongly disagree on his point about getting a pass rush on Rivers. I think if you shut down Gates then you rattle Rivers. Solid zone coverage on the WR’s should take care of the rest. This team is not as good as everyone thinks they are.
Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!
by Buck'O on Jul 29, 2009 12:43 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Good by affiliation?
I totally agree with what you said and I think some of perception of how good they are is because you first compare them to their division rivals. Compared to KC, Oakland and Denver they look ok but compared to the other upper echelon teams in the league the perception changes for me.
"Success is never ending, failure is never final."
by GenericBrand on Jul 29, 2009 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Watched 'em against Pitt in Jan.
They looked pretty good, even in losing.
I was also one who looked at the loss of Olshansky as a loss, but some Bolts fans think he was on the decline and this Cesaire guy is going to make all the difference in the world.
by hmills110 on Jul 29, 2009 3:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Those people are idiots
The fact is that Cesaire is just as good as Olshansky at a fraction of the price.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Jul 29, 2009 8:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have to laugh when people talk about the Chargers being so good.
6 of their 8 wins came against the (Raiders) big accomplishment there, (Chiefs) Two games they won but should have lost. 1 game from Denver when Denver had fell apart. and 1 game from Tampa Bay when they had fallen apart. Only 1 team they beat last year still have the same coach, if you include the Raiders that changed coaches mid season last year, the rest have new coaches this year.
Herm is gone things are better with that one move!!
by bringbacktheglory on Jul 29, 2009 1:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Give the Charger's credit
They’ve lost some good players and LT has lost a step but I still think they’ll win the division. I think their weakest point is coaching so it’ll be fun and I particulary like watching Sproles. He’s a dynamic player if used correctly – not an every down RB but put him in to give LT a breather, have him catching passes out of the back field or even receiver and always have him as the returner on punts or kick-offs. I agree, I think both of these games will be exciting and get split with wins at home.
by RatsoReily on Jul 29, 2009 4:45 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I give them credit
for having amassed an incredible amount of talent and missing their opportunity to win it all. The Chiefs should be competitive with them.
Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!
by Buck'O on Jul 29, 2009 5:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Chargers will not win the division
I’m going w/ Chiefs or Raiders(Yea I said it)
THAT'S GOOD FOR A KANSAS CITY CHIEFS "FIRST DOWN"
by I_AM_NINJA_2 on Jul 30, 2009 10:31 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Shut your dirt mouth.
I don’t want to hear anymore of this raider speak.
"...Said he couldn't go on the American way"
by Jux on Jul 31, 2009 9:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
we beat the colts and patriots last year...
2 of the upper echelon teams… so there is no question we are one of the best in the AFC… we do have some holes, just like every other team does… but they are minor. Our upside is scary if merriman, cromartie, tomlinson, rivers, gates all play to potential.
by truheeyo on Jul 30, 2009 1:53 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















