Madden NFL 10 Kansas City Chiefs Ratings - OUCH!

EA is not giving us a break this year, wow. Two glaring omissions would be Ryan Succop and Mike Brown. Hopefully these guys will be added with a patch, especially since both of them should be starters.

over 2 years ago augmental 7 comments 0 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

BS

Thigpen is a 66? He is at least a 75. Even in the new ratign system. I’d have made Cassel in the 85-87 range.

D-Bowe at 86 is pretty fair at this point, I think. That will be higher next year.

Tyson at 77 and Dorsey at 75 is straight up bull shit. They are top 5 picks. They should come standard as an 80 unless they were drafted by the Raiders.

D-Bowe, Mark Bradley, Bobby Engram and Turtle. Four Chiefs WRers. 4 Pro Bowlers.

by Patrick Allen on Jul 20, 2009 1:50 PM CDT reply actions

I agree, Thiggy’s rating is way too low and should be mid to high 70s. It’s tough to say about T Jack though but if he comes in and gets some sacks it will go higher. Dorsey hasn’t shown much so hopefully as the year progresses he will get a higher rating as well. I am surprised at Albert’s 84 rating I think he deserves to be an 88-89 overall. Colquitt only being a 78 is ridiculous to me.

by augmental on Jul 20, 2009 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions

Mid 70's

Yea Thiggys rating is complete BS. His rating was better on Madden 09. Even then he was more unknown than now and yet they drop his rating? EA is full of shit to be honest. Oh well I can always make a few tweaks to make it better.

"Larry Fitzgerald, move over because there's another young gun, and his name is Dwayne Bowe from Kansas City" - 2009 Cris Carter Hall of Fame WR

In Pioli We Trust! Right?

by KC Nate on Jul 20, 2009 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions

damn

well i think the ratings are shit anyway people dont play their team that they root for the play the high ranked team oh well i kick ass with the chiefs last year ill do it this year too because i can play any team and when not that i doi only play with the CHIEFS i pound the shit out of em with LJ!!!

by apachepride on Jul 20, 2009 1:58 PM CDT reply actions

Is Devard Darling #89 or #81? I thought he changed his number at some point but I can remember what the to/from numbers were. EA has it as #89 and the official roster says #81.

by augmental on Jul 20, 2009 2:08 PM CDT reply actions

Looks like EA screwed up he should be #81.

by augmental on Jul 20, 2009 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions

I dont have much of a problem with this...

and If I did it would be with Flowers being a 77, Colquitt being a 68, and Jamaal Charles being a 66. Actually i take that back Im disappointed with the rating of the secondary.

Lets not forget this team only won 6 games in the last 2 years.

Nothing from Nothing leads to... Your 2009 Kansas City Royals

by averagegatsby on Jul 20, 2009 3:08 PM CDT reply actions