The Kansas City Chiefs waived LS Thomas Gafford, WR C.J. Jones, DT T.J. Jackson and LB Darrell Robertson on Friday. Gafford played in nine games as Kansas City’s long snapper in 2008, while Jackson saw duty in four games for the Chiefs a year ago.
over 2 years ago
TheScootness
16 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
Darrell Robertson?
God damn you Andy Studebaker
by KansasCityShuffle on Jun 19, 2009 1:48 PM CDT reply actions
So does this make Purdum officially our new long-snapper?
Officially, we need depth @ NT & WR
by KansasCityShuffle on Jun 19, 2009 1:50 PM CDT reply actions
I think that's a safe assumption
he’s somewhat of a local kid… glad to see him win the job!
I’d say depth at ILB might be an issue as well
Nah
ZT, DJ, DeMorrio – I think thats pretty solid. For a reserve Corey Mays isn’t bad either
by KansasCityShuffle on Jun 19, 2009 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions
could be...
but, who knows what the new regime is thinking
I thought Robertson would be an impact player at LB
by KansasCityShuffle Mi trade u another Lol to replace one Nah any comments ( ? )
Tell your girls good night !
by 65tosspowertrap on Jun 24, 2009 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions
strange
they have cut several guys that I thought could earn jobs during training camp.
Haley and Pioli must have clearly seen something they didnt’ like, or something that couldn’t be improved upon.
We’ll see if this means that they will sign some other FA… or if guys on the roster have earned their keep already.
I hope this means FA signings are imminent
by KansasCityShuffle on Jun 19, 2009 2:13 PM CDT reply actions
Probably not.
I don’t think so. We’ll probably see a number of our draft choices signed. We are currently limited to 80 signed players and I think we have 85 on the roster. As soon as they start getting contracts with the drafted players they have to cut somebody.
Current roster
Current roster is at 81 so expect at least one more cut before training camp.
I bet there will be more...
they are not done with the roster changes… though I bet there will be more surprises.
someone else we all think will be important to the team will be cut
someone else we’ve never heard of will be signed
seems to be the Pioli way
They will add somebody.
Why cut it down to 81 when you could just cut it down to 80? Why would you wait to cut one more guy? We’re gonna add a player or two so they can do another round of cuts.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
