Haley's Demanding Workouts Will Make the Chiefs a Better Team
By now, most people have heard Todd Haley is a no-nonsense guy. We saw this last year during the Cardinals Super Bowl run when Haley was arguing with star wide receiver Anquan Boldin on the sideline.
We heard about his combative nature from the media when he was hired as head coach in February, and we saw this again when Pro Bowl guard Brian Waters had a bumpy first meeting with his new head coach.
Brandon Albert saw Haley's no-nonsense approach as soon as he got to Kansas City this year.
"The first day I got here," Albert said on Sunday, "when I weighed in, he said, 'Oh, no, no, no, no.' "
Albert weighed in at 341 pounds that day in March, about 25 pounds heavier than his listed weight last year during an impressive rookie season in which he made the switch from guard to tackle, and did it quite well.
Haley made his presence felt right away for Albert when his new head coach gave him another big goal and asked him to drop more than 35 pounds to a playing weight of 305 for the upcoming season.
The now svelte left tackle has dropped almost 30 pounds since then and is working hard with his newly hired nutritionist to drop even more.
Albert's not the only player who hit the buffet line too many times in the offseason.
"Dwayne's another one who probably let himself go too far in the offseason," Todd Haley said during an interview, "so it's been a long road back when you're trying to lose 20-25 pounds."
The Chiefs are already looking like a new team.
"Physically, conditionally, strength-wise, we look like a different group of players for the most part," Haley says. "We've lost 338 pounds, which is a significant amount of weight."
Haley figures the average weight loss for an NFL team during offseason workouts is between 125 and 150 pounds.
Maintaining proper weight can be crucial to a successful season. Brandon Albert says he knows the extra weight he was carrying around last year may have contributed to his nagging injuries last year, and maybe even the team's appalling record of 2-14.
The lack of conditioning could have led to many of the team's losses last year. The Chiefs had a lead in the fourth quarter in numerous games, only to fall apart and give up the lead late in the game.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.
0 recs |
24 comments
Comments
It isn't just a matter of weight loss. I think that the conditioning regime
that they have is just as important. That does two things, builds muscle and promotes team work and comradeship. Several players from last years team have made statements about how much different it is from last year.
They have become a much healthier and stronger team because of it.
Yeah, let's just keep matriculatin' the ball down the field, boys! ...
Order your Arrowhead Pride Wolf Pack T-shirt at ARROWHEAD ATTITUDE
by oldchiefsfan on Jun 18, 2009 10:01 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It was SO painfully obvious how out of shape they were last year
guys were dropping like flies because of injuries EVERY series! It was like a some comedy that wasn’t funny because it was real.
by jonnyu on Jun 18, 2009 11:23 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
AGREED
I very much agree with both of you guys. Thanks for the comments.
by KU2010 on Jun 18, 2009 11:51 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
You're the same author as the Bleacher Report article like this, right?
Just wanted to make sure there was no post stealing :)
by Joel Thorman on Jun 18, 2009 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes Sir
I am Indeed the same author as the Bleacher Report article, I appreciate you guys look out for post stealing.
by KU2010 on Jun 19, 2009 6:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No problem
Maybe mention that in the post next time and link back to your article. Everyone loves traffic :)
by Joel Thorman on Jun 19, 2009 4:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Two glaring downfalls of last year,
especially in the 4th quarter with the game on the line, was conditioning and depth at defense and both have been addressed this offseason. The team, on both sides of the ball, always looked fatigued at the end of the game and too many times in Herm conference he was saying he had guys on the field(on defense) that normally wouldnt/shouldnt be because he had no choice. These things two things alone will make us better.
by GenericBrand on Jun 18, 2009 1:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Herm's idea of conditioning was jogging along and just chatting
Thanks Coach Haley. The team is finally getting into the shape they need to be in.
Oh and on a side note, I heard before that the 2005 New York Jets squad had suffered the largest number of injuries in a regular season. Ever. I can’t the stats anywhere but I remember hearing about it on the radio. Who was the head coach of 2005 NY Jets? Hmmm….
I don't have a girlfriend. I just know a lady who would be really mad if she heard me say that. -Mitch Hedberg
by mistamic on Jun 18, 2009 4:13 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think it was Mangini in NYJ.
Fired and then hired by the Browns, IIRC.
by hmills110 on Jun 18, 2009 5:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is no coincidence. And...
When we played the Chargers at SD last year, Herm went for two instead of kicking the field goal and going into OT and…well, you know the rest. He said after the game that he was not able to put the defense back on the field because if we lost the coin toss, he was afraid they could not get it done.
If our team had been in better shape, we could have kicked the FG, taken the game into OT and had a good chance to win that game.
FUCKIN HERM!!!!
by Chiefsfan1970 on Jun 18, 2009 4:47 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
+100000
Peterson knew he messed up big time when he hired Herm, that is why he left.
Herm is gone things are better with that one move!!
by bringbacktheglory on Jun 18, 2009 11:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Peterson was fired and now wields his power over a kids football league.
Yeah, let's just keep matriculatin' the ball down the field, boys! ...
Order your Arrowhead Pride Wolf Pack T-shirt at ARROWHEAD ATTITUDE
by oldchiefsfan on Jun 19, 2009 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow!
Someone actually voted “NO”
Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!
by Buck'O on Jun 18, 2009 5:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Tank Tyler voted from Oklahoma Joes BBQ
Let's Kick some ASS in 09 or Die trying
by Steve_Chiefs on Jun 18, 2009 5:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Conditioning is part of it.
But I think the depth comments are at least as important. They’ll be bigger and deeper in the big bodies, and they won’t be using ’tweeners as wide bodies. Instead, their ’tweeners will be switched to oversized LB. ’Tweener on the d-line will mean DT-DE hybrid, and not DE-LB hybrid.
Also not mentioned is just the discipline and football awareness. That’s pretty big, especially at 2-minute warning time, in BOTH halves. The intense conditioning and subsequent marching orders will bring more players ready for situational training and practice.
by hmills110 on Jun 18, 2009 5:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
If Bowe really does get down to the playing weight Haley wants
he could have quite the year. The thinner he is the higher he can jump, and the faster he’ll be…imagine if the opposing CB had to actually consider Bowe getting behind him – that quick slant would be open ALL day.
Marley will be walking soon...she could probably play Linebacker better than some of the guys we had.
by PVChiefsfan on Jun 18, 2009 7:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
If Bowe really does get down...
…would that mean he’d run routes longer than 7 yards? That’d be cool w/me…his #‘s last year looked fine, but I didn’t see the plays like the TD catch against the Vikes in his rookie season.
by Special K on Jun 18, 2009 11:09 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Lighter is a misnomer. That's why I voted "No."
The D will actually be BIGGER than last season. And even with Albert trimming-down, the addition of Goff and Brown is definitely a commitment to BIG, too.
Otherwise, I agree with the strength-and-conditioning deal.
by hmills110 on Jun 19, 2009 3:47 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
























