The Chiefs, acting in their best business interest, have told Waters they will consider that option as long as the right opportunity to upgrade their team (read acceptable compensation) becomes available.

Is this true? I haven’t read or heard about this…has anyone else? If so, where was this published or who said this? All that I’ve heard was that players don’t dictate business decisions and they wouldn’t respond to such demands.

our two best players (Tony Gonzalez & Brian Waters) and win more than 2 games, then we’re in good hands

Arizona has no interest in losing him. Interesting to note, though, that, when asked, Haley’s said that if he weren’t locked up in Arizona, he’d fight to bring him to KC. Rather than a first overture, though, I think it’s simply that the Cards have no intention of losing him, and I think they’ll work out a deal. Same with Waters, except he already has a contract that he hasn’t complained about.

Tempest in a teapot until/unless proven otherwise.

telling waters go get a deal somewhere and if its a good trade we will consider it. WHich is no sweat of piolis asss water would get what he wants and we would get what we want more valued younger players.

I would unlock the hold on Boldin by simply calling them up and saying * I will give you Waters and a 2nd rounder ( tony g’s 2nd ) for your Boldin **

• I would think this would unlock the grip by quite a bit by Arizona *

or maybe im stuck in a fatasy world where my team was never 2-14, who knows!