Former Chiefs Defensive Coordinator Gunther Cunningham vs. The Patriot Way
From the FanPosts. Nice work. Edited the title. -Primetime
Gunther Cunningham was raving about his new defense in Detroit after their recent mini-camp. Some of his statements got me thinking. While most of the blame for our terrible defense was laid on Herm Edwards and as Head Coach he should have had the blame, you have to wonder to what extent Gunther screwed this team up.
When Gunther left Kansas City he immediately blamed Herm's defensive scheme for a majority of our problems.
"I've gone through three years of playing zone defenses because I was loyal to (head coach) Herm Edwards and that's what he wanted,'' Cunningham said. "People here in town knew I was different than that. My idea is to put a lot of pressure on the quarterback, it always has been and always will be.
Joe Posanski turned the light on Gunther's attempt to CYA with the scheme argument.
This was despite the fact that the two years before Herm arrived, Cunningham’s defenses finished 31st and 25th in total defense. They weren’t playing zone then — the head coach was Dick Vermeil. and he would let his defensive coordinators do whatever the heck they wanted. Half the time, Vermeil didn’t even know the Chiefs had a defense (and half the time, he was right).
So if Gunther's defenses stunk no matter what schemes he was running, could it be that it was his evaluation of talent that caused the problems?
Remember Junior Savii? Gunther loved his size. Remember when Gunther gave Carl his wish list of Free Agents (Kendrell Bell, Carlos Hall, Ty Law, etc.)? Granted Derrick Thomas, Dale Carter, Neil Smith and the mid 90's defenses succeeded with Gunther at the helm and we all loved those defenses but what do the statistics say?
I thought I would compare Gunther's years with KC (Head Coach and DC) versus the Scott Pioli player personnel years in New England.
Year Points Rank Yards Rank W-L
1995 1 2 13-3
1996 11 18 9-7
1997 1 11 13-3
1998 22 9 7-9
1999 13 14 9-7
2000 19 18 7-9
2004 29 31 7-9
2005 16 25 10-6
2006 11 16 9-7
2007 14 13 4-12
2008 29 31 2-14
Average 15 17 90 - 86
Gunther's defenses over his 11 years were middle of the road. Sure they created a lot of pressure and turnovers most of the time but after his first three years as DC (where he would have inherited most of the talent) his defenses became middle of the league.
Compare these numbers with Pioli's numbers in New England. Granted Bill Belichick ran the defenses but Pioli helped provide the talent. At worst, Pioli learned under Belichick and at best was a partner in the process.
Year Points Rank Yards Rand W-L
2000 17 20 5-11
2001 6 24 11-5
2002 17 23 9-7
2003 1 7 14-2
2004 2 9 14-2
2005 17 26 10-6
2006 2 6 12-4
2007 4 4 16-0
2008 8 10 11-5
Average 8 14 102-42
The New England Defenses for those 9 years have been in the top quarter of the league for scoring defenses. "The Patriot Way" of determining roles and finding the best talent for those roles has shown a lot greater success than falling in love with measurables (i.e. Eric Warfield, Junior Savii, William Bartee, etc). I think that once you have some success with these "measurable" types, you begin believing that you can make it happen all the time.
When you are spoiled with a Derrick Thomas, Neil Smith, Dale Carter then you want to start seeing their attributes in your other drafts. That's why Carl and Gun and whoever the head coach was thought they could draft a big safety and move them to corner.
I guess the question becomes: Would you rather try the Patriot Way of fitting talent to the scheme or go back to the day when Gunther was making these types of statements about Chief's players:
"I'll look at the tape at times and I'll confuse Julian Peterson with Dizon, " Cunningham said.
"Now, one is 6-foot-4, and the other guy is 5-foot-11, but with the way they bend and the way they run, they're very much alike. When you sit in the back of the room watching a tape, if you confuse that, well that shows you what kind of athlete Jordan is."
Gunther Cunningham: I've confused Jordon Dizon with Julian Peterson on tape
I loved the 1995-1997 defenses but now I'm more of the opinion that those defenses were the result of having the right roster for the scheme. When Gunther, Carl and the like had to re-load they didn't have the eye for what would fit. They fell in love with the measurables and that can kill a team.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.
11 recs |
28 comments
|
Comments
Interesting work WC
The first three years of each regime says it all…
by Joel Thorman on May 6, 2009 2:39 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
By the way
I edited the title…a lot of these get picked up by various outlets (Sports Illustrated, Yahoo) so we need a title to match the quality of your work.
by Joel Thorman on May 6, 2009 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The first three years of each regime says it all…
Can you elaborate?
Marley will be walking soon...she could probably play Linebacker better than some of the guys we had.
by PVChiefsfan on May 6, 2009 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
NO!!
Haha…I mean that Pioil and co. inherited a poorer defense (shown in the first three years) and once they got their guys in there it became more successful.
Gunther got there and the first few years were excellent defenses (of players that he inherited) and then became to decline.
by Joel Thorman on May 6, 2009 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's what I thought you meant
just wanted to be sure…danke
Marley will be walking soon...she could probably play Linebacker better than some of the guys we had.
by PVChiefsfan on May 6, 2009 3:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent post, Western.
I don't have religion. I have Baduizm...and Billie Holiday...and Janet. Actually, just Janet.
by DThomasReigns on May 6, 2009 2:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
rec'd
this is amazing
Time is a great teacher... unfortunately it kills all it's pupils.
by 808NaNz808 on May 6, 2009 2:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Right?
Great idea…I’ve been pondering post ideas all week and WC just big timed us.
by Joel Thorman on May 6, 2009 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Football is about players not plays.
Good teams are talented teams. Coaching and scheme can help somewaht but if you lack talent you will struggle.
by saskwatch on May 6, 2009 2:47 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I have a question for Gunther
If you knew that you and Herm didn’t share the same defensive philosophy then why the hell did you stay on? You and Herm were not an ideal mix in the first place. Why didn’t you take a job with a different team? I don’t buy that “loyal to Herm” excuse at all. If you knew it wasn’t going to work then you should have gotten the hell out of there ASAP!
I don't have a girlfriend. I just know a lady who would be really mad if she heard me say that. -Mitch Hedberg
by mistamic on May 6, 2009 2:57 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I would guess after 4 years as DC
And 2 years as HC and another 4 as DC he was being paid well.
by Joel Thorman on May 7, 2009 9:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great post Western. One remarkable thing ...
Aside from 95 and 97, look at the Chiefs numbers – utter mediocrity, with no sign of fluctuation. Now look at the Pats numbers. The thing that stands out the most in my mind is this: the ability to add and subtract players to fit the scheme can turn a mediocre season into a great season the next year. Look at these numbers going from a bad D year (pts allowed ranking) to the following year …..
2000 #17
2001 #6
2002 #17
2003 #1
2005 #17
2006 #2
I don’t have the personnel changes in front of me, but I’d be willing to bet that there were significant changes to the D unit in the offseason between bad and good years. If this is true, then it’s more about the person in charge of selecting players. What does this mean for us? It means that even though we will most likely have up and down years, with a competent GM in place we will no longer be subject to the utter mediocrity that reigned over every year of the Peterson eon.
by Keyser Sose on May 6, 2009 3:04 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with Keyser
The Pats knew how to fix the holes in their defense when it dropped to the middle of the league in ranking. Looking at arrivals to the team would be interesting, and their stats as well. Were the mid-teen ranked defenses the same year as new key players arrived, or the year after? After all, it takes some players a year or two to learn the ropes of the NFL
by Sam D on May 6, 2009 3:23 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I wondered exactly the same thing.
But with the Pats penchant for adding older vets to fill leaky holes, I would speculate that the missing pieces were added the offseason right before the jump.
by Keyser Sose on May 6, 2009 3:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That would make for some interesting research.
I’m anxious to see what the additions of Thomas and Vrabel do for the Chiefs.
by WesternChief on May 6, 2009 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
In case someone didn't know this
the Patriots d-line is made up of three first round picks drafted in 2001, 2003, and 2004.
Marley will be walking soon...she could probably play Linebacker better than some of the guys we had.
by PVChiefsfan on May 6, 2009 5:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So is/was the Chiefs...kind of :)
Hali, Dorsey, Jackson
I don't have religion. I have Baduizm...and Billie Holiday...and Janet. Actually, just Janet.
by DThomasReigns on May 6, 2009 5:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hello! The only reason Gunther did anything was because of Marty
It was never Gunther’s schemes that worked. Regardless of his playoff record, Marty Schottenheimer was one hell of a coach and HE was the reason our defense was amazing. Look what he did in San Diego when he arrived. He rebuilt that team from the ground up. Gunther has never had the touch to run a defense — that’s why you see when Marty left, Gunther’s numbers fell off a cliff.
by KC_Dom on May 6, 2009 3:39 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
as did our win/loss record
Gunther only lasted 2 years as a head coach in KC and wasn’t a d-coordinator till he came back here from the Titans. He was the linebackers coach there but didn’t go any farther up their food chain. Makes you think.
by Eastcoastransplant on May 7, 2009 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
KC_Dom has a real point
I would love to see a post like this and compare Marty’s defensive numbers with whoever he had as coordinator to these guys. Say what you want about Marty and playoff success the man has built some great teams over the years.
Also do you have the corresponding offensive numbers with the defense. I am a firm believer that your offense and defense feed off of eachother, and are alot closer linked than alot of these posts show. Sure makes the defense looks better if your offense is moving the ball and scoring and getting field position. Hard on a defense when you are always 3 and out. Also ball control offenses (I mean effective ones not what we got from Herm) like them or not can play to your defense keeping the opposing offense off the field and out of sync.
Great post though, would love to see offensive numbers in there as well to take into consideration and complete the picture.
by Zimmy on May 6, 2009 4:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
would anyone love
to see Marty’s early def with Vermeil’s off. We would have been unstoppable. Just nice to think about.
by bringbacktheglory on May 6, 2009 4:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I blame Gun and Carl because Herm never wanted Gun to begin with
by FrankPitts on May 6, 2009 4:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Herm sucked
That is why the Jets we laughing all the way to the draft that they suckered Carl to give up a draft pic for Herm.
by bringbacktheglory on May 6, 2009 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let me ask, is it more with Gunther or Carl Peterson
Granted he (Gunther) may have had some direction in players picked, but ultimately I think Carl loaded him with a lot of dudes, not sure if that is more the fault of the coach or faulty scouting.
I think Gunther is a hell of a good DC (this coming from a Bronco fan), your analysis is interesting, but I think it comes down to two things, getting good players (Pats did that and Chiefs missed on a lot) and coaching (not sure if Gunther is that bad of a coach).
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
by Broncoman on May 6, 2009 7:06 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for stopping by
Good DCs don’t use personnel as an excuse, at least in my estimation.
And, yes, you’re right about Peterson. The responsibility (and credit) for any and all personnel moves fall at his feet. Gunther may have made recommendations but Peterson was the man signing off on everything.
by Joel Thorman on May 6, 2009 7:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It is Well Documented
That Carl gave his coaches almost “carte blanche” when it came to picking their players, both in the Draft and as Free Agents. In the end I am liable to blame both Carl and the Coaches in kind. It appears to me that Carl was too laid back when it came to player selection (the only well documented case of him going a different direction from a coach was Larry Johnson). So that leaves the Coaches largely responsible for their own selections and the poor performance of their sides of the ball…
by Skrappy on May 6, 2009 11:47 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















